Reconcil FI and CO

Hi all,
How to Reconcilation the FI profit and CO Profit?
is there any specific T.code for this?
Thanks in advance.
Soma

The CO & FI can be often OFF due several obvious reasons. For e.g. you initially post an expense in FI & Cost center(X) in CO,after that you transferred the expense from Cost center (X) to Cost center(Y), then this doesn't effect FI since it's an activity within CO only. This results in FI & CO mismatch, where in FI the cost center is still (X),whereas in CO it's (Y).
Now, to have FI & CO in sink, you should activate the FI/CO Reconciliation ledger & at every month end close you should execute the reconciliation posting (Transaction code KALC).
Once, you maintain this reconciliation, your FI & CO will always be in sink.
Regarding the comparison of profit from FI & CO , you could compare the standard reports for FI profit & CO profit.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Reconcilation BOM and WIP to GL

Hi,
Can any one of you please tell me how to reconcile BOM and WIP to GL
Regards
Swetha

Nothing flows directly from BOM to GL.
The work order requirements are created based on the BOM.
When the work order transactions are done (such as wip component issue, wip completion, backflush etc.), records are created in mtl_material_transactions.
Then at month end (or several times during the month), you transfer transactions to GL (either in Summary or in Detail based on the setup on the Organization parameters screen).
That creates records in the GL Interface table.
Then you run the Journal Import program. That actually posts the entries to the GL.
See http://docs.oracle.com/cd/A60725_05/html/comnls/us/cst/invmfg01.htm for some overview.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Reconcile credit and debit

hi
in AR abc super user responsibility-transactions ,then in tools -View accounting form we r able to see the credit and debit entry fields
also there is another 2 fields showing total debit and total credit
i wanted to create a report where the client wants to reconcile debit and credit ie he wants net amount=debit-credit
this is the outpt i got from system -last query
TRX_CLASS_NAME       TRX_NUMBER_DISPLAYED   TRX_DATE           DOC_SEQUENCE_NAME      ENTERED_DR   ENTERED_CR
Invoice                            2006-340-S               12/31/2006                   AR_OPEN_INV            387.69
   Invoice                           2006-340-S              12/31/2006                        AR_OPEN_INV                               387.69
when i do entered_dr -entered_cr in the query tht column appears blank as the credit and debit are in different rows
is it possible to get the net amount for each invoice ie for 2006-340-S the net amount should be zero
kindly guide
thanking n advance

hi
this is the query tht was used to generate the output
SELECT
        l1.meaning trx_class_name,
       ct.trx_number trx_number_displayed,
       ct.trx_date trx_date,
       fd.NAME doc_sequence_name,
       TO_NUMBER (DECODE (ctlgd.account_class,
                          'REC', DECODE (SIGN (NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)),
                                         -1, NULL,
                                         NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)
                          DECODE (SIGN (NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)),
                                  -1, -NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0),
                                  NULL
                 ) entered_dr,
       TO_NUMBER (DECODE (ctlgd.account_class,
                          'REC', DECODE (SIGN (NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)),
                                         -1, -NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0),
                                         NULL
                          DECODE (SIGN (NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)),
                                  -1, NULL,
                                  NVL (ctlgd.amount, 0)
                 ) entered_cr
FROM ra_customer_trx_all ct,
       ra_customer_trx_lines_all ctl,
       ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all ctlgd,
       ra_customer_trx_lines_all ctl2,
       ar_vat_tax_all avt,
       mtl_units_of_measure muom,
       ra_rules rr,
       ra_salesreps_all s,
       ra_cust_trx_types_all ctt,
       gl_daily_conversion_types glct,
       hz_cust_site_uses_all su,
       hz_cust_accounts cust_acct,
       hz_parties party,
       ra_batch_sources_all bs,
       fnd_document_sequences fd,
       ar_lookups l6,
       ar_lookups l2,
       ar_lookups l5,
       ar_lookups l4,
       ar_lookups l1,
       ar_lookups l3
WHERE l6.lookup_code = 'DETAIL_LINE'
   AND l6.lookup_type = 'VIEW_ACCOUNTING'
   AND l5.lookup_code = 'LINE'
   AND l5.lookup_type = 'VIEW_ACCOUNTING'
   AND l3.lookup_type =
          DECODE (ctlgd.collected_tax_ccid,
                  NULL, 'AUTOGL_TYPE',
                  'DISTRIBUTION_SOURCE_TYPE'
   AND l3.lookup_code =
          DECODE (ctlgd.collected_tax_ccid,
                  NULL, NVL (ctlgd.account_class, 'REV'),
                  'DEFERRED_TAX'
   AND s.salesrep_id(+) = ctlgd.cust_trx_line_salesrep_id
   AND /* Outer join workaround(ORA-1417): Since we cannot outer join to another table for the org_id, the following is decode is used */ NVL
                                                                                                                                            (ct.org_id,
                                                                                                                                             -99
                                                                                                                                            ) =
                                                                                                                                            DECODE
                                                                                                                                               (s.salesrep_id,
                                                                                                                                                NULL, NVL
                                                                                                                                                   (ct.org_id,
                                                                                                                                                    -99
                                                                                                                                                NVL
                                                                                                                                                   (s.org_id,
                                                                                                                                                    -99
   AND avt.vat_tax_id(+) = ctl.vat_tax_id
   AND NVL (avt.org_id(+), -99) = NVL (ctl.org_id, -99)
   AND muom.uom_code(+) = ctl.uom_code
   AND rr.rule_id(+) = ctl.accounting_rule_id
   AND l4.lookup_code = DECODE (ctlgd.posting_control_id, -3, 'N', 'Y')
   AND l4.lookup_type = 'YES/NO'
   AND l2.lookup_code(+) = ctl.line_type
   AND l2.lookup_type(+) = 'STD_LINE_TYPE'
   AND ct.doc_sequence_id = fd.doc_sequence_id(+)
   AND l1.lookup_code = ctt.TYPE
   AND l1.lookup_type = 'INV/CM'
   AND ct.cust_trx_type_id = ctt.cust_trx_type_id
   AND NVL (ct.org_id, -99) = NVL (ctt.org_id, -99)
   AND ct.exchange_rate_type = glct.conversion_type(+)
   AND ct.bill_to_site_use_id = su.site_use_id
   AND ct.bill_to_customer_id = cust_acct.cust_account_id
   AND cust_acct.party_id = party.party_id
   AND ct.batch_source_id = bs.batch_source_id
   AND NVL (ct.org_id, -99) = NVL (bs.org_id, -99)
   AND ctl.link_to_cust_trx_line_id = ctl2.customer_trx_line_id(+)
   AND NVL (ctl.org_id, -99) = NVL (ctl2.org_id(+), -99)
   AND ctlgd.customer_trx_line_id = ctl.customer_trx_line_id(+)
   AND NVL (ctlgd.org_id, -99) = NVL (ctl.org_id(+), -99)
   AND ctlgd.account_set_flag = 'N'
   AND ct.customer_trx_id = ctlgd.customer_trx_id
   AND NVL (ct.org_id, -99) = NVL (ctlgd.org_id, -99)i see this ctlgd.amount is used to calcualate entered_cr and entered_dr ,and there by it appears in two diffrent rows.
kindly guide

How to Reconcile ARE3 and ARE1 document

Dear All
We are bringing goods from factory to our warehouse using STO - here we issue ARE3
We are issuing Invoice from warehouse to customer - here we issue ARE1 (Multiple ARE1 can be done against single ARE3 and vice-versa)
Please guide how to reconcile ARE3 and ARE1 document.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Animesh

Hi
Check these T codes
J1IANX18
Pro Forma of Running Bond Account Pro Forma of Running Bond Account
J1IANX19
Export of Excisable Goods Export of Excisable Goods
J1IARE_AGE
Aging Analysis for ARE Documents Aging Analysis for ARE Documents
regards
Prashanth

Error in reconcilation Function - Job "Reconcile roles and privileges"

SAP NW 7.0 SP2 Patch 3
Roles contain Privileges
Help file says: "If you are using roles and privileges, you will need to perform a reconciliation of the roles/privileges assigned to the users in the identity store after the roles are modified. "
Job imported as described.
When I let the job run on the ID-Store, for each entry, the following error message occurs:
runFunctionsInString($FUNCTION.reconcile( MSKEY )$$) got exception
org.mozilla.javascript.NotAFunctionException: reconcile( MSKEY )
...where MSKEY is, of course, the MSKEY of the entry.
If I let run the job with the Windows-Dispatcher and as a VB-script, it produces no error; however, in the output file, there are a lot of Messages like
"!ERROR: Invalid use of Null"
Only some entries (of Type MX_PERSON) show the "Priviliege added: (...)" output. But the job does not add the Privileges assigend to the role, as it should.
So, I would suggest that one redefines the SQL-Query of the Job so that it runs only on MX_PERSONS. But then, still, in my case, it does nothing.
Has anyone better experiences with the Job?
Edited by: Thomas P. Felder on Sep 25, 2008 10:32 AM

The job when imported by default uses java runtime engine but the script is written in vbscript syntax so you have to change the engine or the script syntax.
When you did your select statement did you use SELECT DISTINCT. That will also cause errors. I do not narrow the entry type to MX_PERSON.
I'm installing the patch now; I will see if I get any errors.

Reconcile Account and attributes

Reconcile provides the following output is there a way to configure IDM to also display attribute reconciliation data?
Account Index search results
|Resource Account Name|Resource Name|Situation|Owner|
My DB Table has a role column that I wish to reconcile against the users OU in Active Directory . We also have an extended attribute (SYS_ROLE) which was populated with the value of ADs OU. I am able to reconcile the users in my DB Table against IDM.
I would like to also reconcile the (DB TABLE)EMP_ROLE against the (IDM) SYS_ ROLE, Which would essentially show inconsistencies with AD and my DB table by showing me the inconsistencies with IDM and my DB table.
User accounts already exist and I am not looking to load from the DB table.
I have specified Reconciled Account Attributes in my Reconciliation Policy and have looked at defining an Account Index Report (does not allow the filter by attribute recon results)
Is there a way to accomplish this type of attribute reconciliation AND view the results/create csv?
Example data
AD OUs
cn=UserA,ou=Temp,ou=User Accounts,dc=example
cn=UserB,ou=Perm,ou=User Accounts,dc=example
cn=UserC,ou=Depro,ou=User Accounts,dc=example
DB Table
|EMP_ID|EMP ROLE|
|userA| Temp|
|UserB|Perm|
|UserC|Depro|
IDM Reposatory
|ACCOUNT_ID|SYS ROLE|
|userA| Temp|
|UserB|Perm|
|UserC|Depro|

HI,
To reconcile, FI with Costing based CO-PA, you can try report KEAT. If you are especially, trying to reconcile COGS (referring your posts in other threads), then you won't find any link to CO-PA document, as there is no posting to Costing based CO-PA at the time of PGI. Consider, building a Custom report using table VBFA (SD document flow), to find out documents which are not billed yet, but delivered. There are some standard SD reports to find out outstanding/pending SD documents:
VL06O     Review outbound deliveries for Goods Issue
VF04     Billing due list
VFX3     List of blocked billing documents
Periodically, business users should make sure they run these reports and clear pending/outstanding items to the extent possible. If any of the Deliveries are not billed, then your custom report should list out such pending documents to help in reconciliation.
Hope this helps.

Reconciling payroll and GL

Hi ,
We have transferred june 2010 payroll to GL. After posting to GL we see the credit and debit are not equal. how can we troubleshoot this.

Hello Rudra,
In relation to this reconcilliation issue, please refer to the following
blog and carefully follow the steps outlined there.
Afterwards if the issue is not resolved please provide us details of
your findings and workings as per the blog.
Year-End-Closing in Asset Accounting (best practices)
Also the ledger scenario in your company code should have set up a
smiliar looking to this:
AREA     TEXT            POST TO GL                             LEDGER
01       Local GAAP     1 (Real time)                            0L
05       abcdefg         3 (Depreciation only)                    L2
33       DELTA AREA      5 or 6 (APC only or Only APC directly)   L2
Please can you check again in your system if your ledger scenario is
set up like above example putting your attention to the posting
indicator of each area involved in the matter.
With this setting you assure that postings into non-ledger L2 are
exactly and only the ones that you would expect.
Hope this helps
Ray
Edited by: Raymond Moynihan on Oct 11, 2011 6:42 PM

How to reconcile iCloud and the moved mobile account?

I signed iCloud with my apple account (long ago) then today moved my mobileme.com and then got 2 accounts with nothing on iCloud, everything is on the migrated me account.
How can I get my data back to my iCloud acount?

What worked for me was to go into System Preferences, MobileMe pane and sign out, this was after I did the "Move to iCloud" thing.
After a little time, the iCloud showed everything as expected.
I think the servers are still slow.

Vendor aging - Unreconciled postings also shows in reconciled postings

Dear all,
Suppose we have open ap invoices which appears in unreconciled transactions which is ok,
Why it is also showing in reconciled transactions ?
Jeyakanthan

What is result for checking & un-checking?
Display vendor with zero balance
Display Reconciled transactions
Consider Reconciliation Date in Vendor aging report of By Journal Posting tab ?
Is this in relation to the Aging report (AR / AP) ?
If it is then:
"Display vendor with zero balance":
If you have a Customer BP Code, and you post an AR invoice for $ 1000.
Then you create manually (not using the 'copy to' or 'copy from' feature) a AR Credit Memo for $ 1000, the BP code will show a balance of 0 (zero). However, the AR Invoice and AR Credit Memo has not been internal reconciled together. The BP code is just zero balance because of mathematical calculation (+1000 then -1000).
If you CHECK the "Display vendor with zero balance" chec kbox, SAP B1's Aging report will display this type of BP and its transaction. If you dont check it, SAP B1's Aging report will not show it in the Aging.
Display Reconciled transactions:
If you check this box, all transactions that have been reconciled by SAP B1 will also be shown.
For example, you post an AR invoice for $ 3000.
Then you create using the 'copy to' or 'copy from' feature a AR Credit Memo for $ 3000, the BP code will show a balance of 0 (zero). Both AR Invoice and AR Credit Memo will be reconciled together and the document status will become close. Both of these AR Invoice and AR Credit Memo will show up in the Aging if you check this box.

Un reconciled transaction report

Hi all,
When we run BRS report we will get reconciled transaction and Unreconciled transactions report
Under Unreconciled transaction we will get a headings and values as follows
Open in Book after dates       xxxxxx                                      Open in bank after date     xxxxxx
Bank's Closing Balance             xxxxxx                       Book's Closing Balance             xxxxxx
Transaction in bank after date xxxxxx                       Transaction in book after date xxxxxx
Total in book for checking         xxxxxx                       Total in bank for checking         xxxxxx
If some one can explain, it will be a grate help
SBO version 2005 B
Kind regards
Rashid

Hi,
Thanks for your reply , in the following scenario i need some clarification
VALUE DATE : 31.03.09
                                                                  Unreconciled Transactions
Total credits in Books   : Rs. 123,335.94                                    Total Debit in Bank : Rs. 174,048.00
Total open in Books      : Rs. -123,335.94                                   Total Credit in Bank: Rs. 357,395.00
Total Open in Bank:   Rs. 184,347.00
Open in books after date :    (4,364,249.01)                                 Open in Bank After date : 7,506,301.09
Bank`s closing Balance            : 5,266,069.84                  Book`s closing balance          :  (2,326,264.66)
Transactions in Bank after date : 2,402,915.24                  Transaction in books after date : (2,181,982.30)
Total in books for checking       : 3,181,400.13                    Total in bank for checking        :   3,181,400.13
Balance as per Bank :   5,266,069.84
Balance as per SAP   : -2,326,982.30
Differences                    7,593,052.14
How can i get the list of unreconciled transactions in bank book and bank ledger matching with the above difference.
TIA
Kind regards
Rashid
Edited by: Muhammed Rashid on Sep 10, 2009 10:09 AM

ICR Process 2 - Parallel Recon by Trading Partner (TP) and TP Profit Center

Experts,
At my current implementation, I would like to reconcile accounts (Process 2) by trading partner, and also by trading partner profit center, essentially reconciling the same data for a period in two different ways. Instead of reconciling data the first way and then backing up the period, and reconciling the second in ICR; is it possible to run two different special reconciliation ledgers for Process two and use one to reconcile with a set of rules for trading partner and the second to reconcile with a set of rules for trading partner profit center? It appears I could create a reconciliation process 4 in the FBIC010 & FBRC7 and assign a secondary special ledger to it, but how would ICR know to look for the right recon ledger when you run FBICA2 and FBICR2?
Does anyone have experience and can chime in on this scenario?
Please Advise
Thanks!
John Scime

I needed to update the field movement in the reconcilation ledger.
The hierarchy with TP PC is showing up now but some documents are not appearing in the reconciliation display. I am going to delete the transactional data index tables and post fresh. I think that will solve the display issue as it has in the past.
I am using two sets one for all Intercompany Accoutns in the reconcilation ledger, and another for all profit centers. I am matching the sets against themselves for the object groups (ie compare all accounts against all accounts...all PC against all PC)
Is there anythign i should investigate Link[Take at the InterCo PC Recon Here|http://img717.imageshack.us/i/26681721.png/]
Link[Look at the Accounts Recon Here|http://img443.imageshack.us/i/85219511.png/]
Thanks,
John Scime
Edited by: John Scime on Jul 14, 2010 6:25 PM

Reconcile Subcontract Challan

Hi Guys,
I want to Renconcile the Challan which Posted Completed thru J1IF13.I want to do a Reconcilation the Challan Which already Reconcile Partlly and Posted Completed.
I thought Once Challan is Posted Completed,system will not allow to make any changes inb challan.Is there any way to Reconcile the Challan which has already Posted as completed ie: Reverse the GR and GI.
Regards
Sathish

Hi,
According to my knowledge u cannot reconcile challan which is already completed.
Bcoz when u complete the challan ,it indicates that the liabilities for that challan are finished for further postings.
Regards,
Satpal

Reconcilation procedure

hi friends
can anybody pls come up with
what is "<b>reconcilation</b>" and <b>standard procedure</b> to do reconcilation
thanks in advance
venkat

Reconcilation is the process of comparing the data after it is transferred to the BW system with the source system. The procedure to do reconcilation is either you can check the data in the souce system table(is SE16 tcode) also you can compare using extract checker RSA3 to compare the records.
check this doc
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
Check these threads,
Re: Reconciliation
Reconciliation procedure
Hope it helps.
Regards.

Reconcil. acct is missing in master record, correct master record

Dear Experts,
i created the intercompany billing document.
but it has not generated any accounting document.
it is giving the error Reconcil. acct is missing in master record, correct master record.
In my customer master record i have filled up reconcil acct.
and now if i want to made any changes in that i am not able to do that.
so now what can be the alternate solution for that.

hello, friend.
you mentioned that the field for recon account (company code view) has been greyed out in change mode? it is possible your FI has set this field as display only (text control) while in change mode. please check with your FI consultant and if so, the field should be made modifiable so you can make changes.
if this is not possible, then cancelling the intercompany transaction becomes a likely option.
please post feedback again.

Email has stopped working and cannot be re-setup; 'Activation failed' and 'Security of the connection cannot be verified' errors

The blackberry stopped receiving email as of Dec 22. it does reeive Registration messages from blackberry. The browser still works. I contacted the provider and the network is functioning correctly. I have deleted the email setup several times and set it up again; I have removed the battery and restarted and reset up the email. This involves a hotmail.ca account. During email setup it checks for update and indicates the mailbox is set up and then it wants to reconcile contacts and that is when the Activation Failed; an error was encountered when sending the activation transmission notice appears. When I use the browser to go to hotmail.ca and login, I can see all my email up to date and then an error message pops up indicating, Server Certificate Warning and when I select Details; it inidcaes untrusted certificate; unable to determine certificate's origin; when I view the certificate it identifies X h.live.com Untrusted Certificate Chain; Stale Chain Status etc... It's like the hotmail.ca or live.com is corrupted...how do I fix it. The only thing I have not doe is to use the Security tool to Wipe email. Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated.

The infofmation in this link should help you:
Unable to integrate or send from a Sympatico or Bell Aliant email account on the BlackBerry 10 smar...
I know the link speaks specifically of BlackBerry10 devices, but use the settings to see if they help you. Your path to the email setup > Advanced settings may be different.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Reconcil FI and CO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for