Record results per Product, not per inspection characteristic

Dear,
Is is possible, in transaction QE51N to record results per product (or serial number) rather than per characteristic?
Today, I can only see a result recording per characteristic. For example: for inspection characteristic 1, I enter all the results for each product, then I go to inspection characteristic 2, etc. I would like to enter my results per products, i.e. for product 1: enter results for inspection characteristic 1, 2, ..., and then do the same for product 2, etc.
Is that possible?
Regards,

NehSAP wrote:
What are the parameters you entering to execute QE51N? I believe you are ececuting this transaction for chara not inspection lot or material. Make sure you are not entering MIC in intial screen throgh variant.
>
> If you execute QE51N for particular one lot then you can see all assigned MIC to that lot in transaction output & you can record them one by one.
>
That is what I do. I execute the transaction for one particular inspection lot. However, when I enter into the record results screen for this particular inspection lot, I first have to "enter" into one of the master inspection characteristic, and then start recording per product (or serial number). What I would like to have is to "enter" into one product (or serial number), and for this particular product, enter all the master inspection characteristics I have previously defined.
If you still don't see what I mean, can you give me your e-mail so that I can attach an image
Oh yes, and by the way, is it possible to execute the transaction qe51n based on the criteria "production order" instead of on the criteria "inspection lot" or "plant" or whatever. I know that you change it in the layout, but I really can't find the production order on the "hidden fields"
Regards,
Edited by: MrFitch on Nov 8, 2011 9:11 AM

Similar Messages

Inspection record results

when i save the inspection resord resilts notification number is created. after creation the notification i need to change the same notification. so which user exit its stored or how to change the notification while saveing the inspection record results
Moderator message: only one thread per issue, please.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Aug 24, 2011 3:36 PM

NehSAP wrote:
What are the parameters you entering to execute QE51N? I believe you are ececuting this transaction for chara not inspection lot or material. Make sure you are not entering MIC in intial screen throgh variant.
>
> If you execute QE51N for particular one lot then you can see all assigned MIC to that lot in transaction output & you can record them one by one.
>
That is what I do. I execute the transaction for one particular inspection lot. However, when I enter into the record results screen for this particular inspection lot, I first have to "enter" into one of the master inspection characteristic, and then start recording per product (or serial number). What I would like to have is to "enter" into one product (or serial number), and for this particular product, enter all the master inspection characteristics I have previously defined.
If you still don't see what I mean, can you give me your e-mail so that I can attach an image
Oh yes, and by the way, is it possible to execute the transaction qe51n based on the criteria "production order" instead of on the criteria "inspection lot" or "plant" or whatever. I know that you change it in the layout, but I really can't find the production order on the "hidden fields"
Regards,
Edited by: MrFitch on Nov 8, 2011 9:11 AM

Inspect and Inspected field in Record Results:Characteristic overview

hi,
Can any one explain me the Inspect and Inspected field in Record Results:Characteristic overview screen. How the sample size is determined in Inspected field during lot creation.
Muthamil

Dear Muthamil
This fully depends on the sampling procedure you choose. for eg if you choose 100% sampling procedure and you have lot quantity of 10 items
Then inspect will be 10 and inspected will be 10.
SAP gives the definition for INSPECT as - Predefined sample size that has to be inspected for an inspection characteristic or a partial sample.
For each inspection plan characteristic you define the amount by which the inspected sample size in the 'Insp.ed' field can deviate from the to-be-inspected sample size in the 'Inspect' field. If a characteristic (partial sample ) is closed the system checks whether the required sample size is adhered to. The characteristic (partial sample) can only be closed if this is the case.
But for Scope not fixed, larger , smaller scope the inspected field chages based on the result recording
SAP gives the definition for INSPECTED as - Number of sample units that have been inspected for a characteristic or a partial sample.
Hope this explains
Regards
Gajesh

Reg: When trying for [Record Set Per Message] Payload not generating MONI

Hi,
Can you please change the value of FCC parameters from
Record Set Per Message:: 1
Key Field Value: KF
Key Field Type: Case Sensitive
Record Set Per Message:: 1
Key Field Value: K01
Key Field Type: Case Sensitive
Regards,
Chandra

Hi,
If you want to split file according to Record set per message, check below settings with your configuration.
Ex file:
Amarsrinivas,Eli,4444,XYZ,3
Sachin,Tendulkar,29564,ABC,9
Ajay,Jadeja,5555,PQR,5
*IR PART*
See this is the Outbound Data type I have created::
*ADT_Record_Outbound     Complex Type     *
Record                            Element           0..unbounded(This is used for if Record set per message more then one.Structure Occurance.Not the message type)
First_Name            Element       xsd:strin     1
Last_Name            Element     xsd:string     1
EMP_ID                            Element     xsd:string     1
Project_Status            Element     xsd:string     1
Experience            Element     xsd:string     1
THis is the Inboudn Data type I have created::
ADT_Record_Inbound
*ADT_Record_Inbound     Complex Type     *
Record                    Element      0..unbounded(This is used for if Record set per message more then one.Structure Occurance.Not the message type.One to one mapping done)
FullName     Element     xsd:string     1
Global_ID     Element     xsd:string     1
Project     Element     xsd:string     1
IT_Exp     Element     xsd:string     1
This is the Mapping I have done.....
ForSource Message TYpe I kep Occurancs as 1
For Target Message Type as I kept Occurances as 1
ID Part::
CONTENT CONVERSION PARAMETERS::
Document Name:: AMT_Record_Outbound
Document Namespace:: http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Document Offset::
RecordSet Name::Record
RecordSet Structure: ---:Record,*
Recordset Sequence,* ::: Assensding
Record Set Per Message:: (As you required)(According to that target file and message will create)(If you mention 2 each 2 structure one message will flow in SXMB_MONI)
Key Field Value:
Key Field Type: Case Sensitive
Record.fieldSeparator= ,
Record.endSeparator= nl
Record.fieldNames= First_Name,Last_Name,EMP_ID,Project_Status,Experience
ignoreRecordsetName= true
Regards,
Prakasu.M

Search Preferences: Where is Results per page information stored?

I need to update the "Results per page" information for all users, and have been trying to find the field in the database. How is it stored??

Yannick -
Thank you for the reply. Do you know which table is used in OID? Basically why I need to do this is we hire many new employees every week and create accounts in AD. We sync AD -> OID but the people who create the new users never inform me that they have been created so they never get a default group assigned. This causes them to go to the 'Portal Builder' page when they login to the portal.
To fix this issue Im writing a powershell script to automatically update the default group of all employees that do not have a default group assigned. Do you know if a better method I can accomplish this for bulk OID records automatically? I'm very much open new/better ideas this was the best method I could think of currently.
Thanks again.

Prevent entering result recording after the production order closed.

Hi QM Gurus,
I want to prevent entering the result recording (we used inspection point) after the corresponding production order was closed.
Please help.
Cheers,
Sun

hi all,
Enhancement QEEM0015 is only used for individual result, it can not be used for summerized result.
Enhancement QEEM0011 is the right one for my case.
It works before the system valuates the inspectoin characteristics' result for both individual and summerized result.
Thanks all for your help.
Regards,
Sun

File content conversion record set per message

Dear All,
Problem:- File is of huge size because of which file content conversion is taking longer time and is failing.
File format:-
Header
Detail
Detail
Header
Detail
Detail
Detail
Detail
Header
Detail
Detail
Trailer
Trailer has total count of all detail record,header record and there are few checks as well as wrt other fields.
We need to do all the above validation on the file and if it successful it shud process it otherwise alert shud be raised.
As a step:-
I have used record set per message for splitting up the file because of huge size this functionality is working fine but because of spitting of file i am not able to do trailer validation as XI is creating multiple records with different message ID's
Is any other approch which will help to achieve both Spliting as well as validation
chirag

Chirag,
simplest scenario I can think of is splitting the 2 reqs.
1. create 2 folders, one for "in process" files and other for "validated" files.
2. create 2 scenarios:
2.1. your current sender system to in process folder (whatever to File).
=> In this you just do the validation, without FCC. You could create a simple module for that or even do it at mapping runtime, as you said (mapping may be easier to handle errors), and throw a runtime exception (which will eventually trigger an alert).
=> At the end, only files that go successfully throug the validation will be located in the "In Process" folder.
2.2. do a simple file to file scenario (from "In Process" to "Validated" folder), this time executing FCC & splitting messages if necessary.
Of course, this will only work if the module/mapping is able to process the large file anyway (hopefully yes, since it will still be a flat file and not XML yet).
BR,
Henrique.

BUG: Record Limit per Document doesn't work for PDF in CS4 - does it work in CS5?

Hey all - I'm attempting to export 100 data merged documents to pdf. I know i can use "Record Limit per Document" set to 1 to create 100 InDesign files, which isn't what i want to do. When you select "Export to PDF" in the data merge window, the "record limit per document" option exists, but no matter what, it will always create one giant pdf file - it will NOT separate into 100 different pdf files. This is a bug in CS4.
I am wondering if the bug has been fixed in CS5 or if there is a workaround in CS4 to generate the pdfs.
All I found is this ancient thread in which people say the only workaround is to batch convert the pdf files later, and then degenerates into unrelated discussion:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/1110826

g'day there
has there been any follow-up to this or workarounds?
i constantly have VDP jobs which have tens of thousands of records, but the chaps printing it only want the PDFs in lots of 500 or so. being able to do ONE merge which splits the merge into bite-size PDFs for our printing section would be preferable to making them through the dialog box in the appropriate lots.
colly

Google Advanced Search only displays 10 Results per page in Firefox 3.6.10

In Google Advanced Search, choose any value for Results per page greater than 10 and do a search. When using Firefox 3.6.10, only 10 results are displayed on each page of results. 10 results per page is the Google default, and the Results per page selection apparently has no effect.
This problem also happens in Google Chrome 6.0.472.63.
The Results per page feature of Google Advanced Search is working properly in other browsers, such as Safari 4.1.2 on a PowerPC Mac and IE 7.0.5730.13 and IE 6.0.2900.5512.xpsp3_gdr.100427-1636 on a PC running Windows XP

Google recently made some changes to the Google search site with the addition of Instant search and that made the setting of the number of results in the Google settings to stop working. 
 
If Instant search is enabled on the [http://www.google.com/preferences?hl=en Google Search settings] page (link at the top right) then you only get 10 results. 
You have to disable instant search and reload the result page and then set the number of results to your preferred choice. 
It may not work if you make both changes at the same time. 
 
There is a link directly to the right of the Google search field on the Google results page. 
That is a button with a drop down list: Instant is On/Off.

How do I know quiz results per question using Javascript

We have some quizzes in Captivate and we would like to extract quiz results per question so that we know which question the user did correct and which one was incorrect. The requirement is that we do not want to code inside Captivate as the Captivate movies are provided by the users, so all code needs to be done would be in Javascript on the HTML page.
Any ideas are welcome.
Thank you
Kirmani

Have a look at Jim Leichliter's blog site. Lately he published a video course about using JS in Captivate, that could be useful.
http://captivatedev.com/2014/01/02/javascript-video-series-adobe-captivate-7/
Lilybiri

Override content by search Web Part's limit of 50 results per page

Hello ,
Happy New year 2015.
SharePoint 2013 search webPart renders a maximum of 50 search results per page and it
is not possible to change this hardwired limit by configuring the web part.
If i set it to greater than 50, it throws an error.
How to override this limit of 50 so that i display all result in the same page ( no need to pagination).
I look for a client side solution if possible.
Note : i have applied the solution proposed by Matt
Stark int this work around Blog and i set the limit to 700 but the webPart still get it limit number 50 in stead
of 700.
in my display template , i see that ctx.ClientControl.get_numberOfItems()=700 and in my html i see only 50 items per page.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks

Hi PiingPoint,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to show more than 50 results in a page in core search web part.
The "Results Per Page" maximum value 50 is hard-code in OOB Search Core Results Web Part by design, so it could only return maximum 50 items per page, when"Result Per Page" value is larger than 50, it will display default 10 items
per page.
It's for end user experience and performance. Webpart is mostly used as a portion of a page view which users won't want to scroll too much, its not considered to be a good end user experience. Additionally beyond a point we would need
to consider performance aspects to display thousands of items on web page views, hence a maximum value of 50 items without paging has been made available by design to take care of these aspects.
If you want to show more than 50 results per page, you need to develop a custom core search web part to do it.
Best Regards,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

View Interaction Record as per user

Hi All,
I want to view all the interaction record as per the user. Let me clear about this.
I hv configure the agent inbox profile and assign the quick search to it. But still I am not getting the interaction record as p[er the user. I f I log in In some user name Ex:-xxx I should see only the interaction record under user XXX. Can anybody let me know the answer.
Thanx
Chinmaya

Hello Chinmaya.
Well, that depends on your business logic.
I only had implementation scenarios, where users had the need to consult it's customer historic interactions. So in this case, it doesn't matter who was the user that treated a past interaction record... they are free to view it, as long they belong to the same group responsible.
In your scenario, you just want to be available a search for the interaction records created by the logged user, or restrict all possible searches to documents created by the logged user?
Kind regards.

IProcurement Search Results Per Page

Hi to All,
Was looking for a profile option that controls the search results per page. We know there is the iProcurement section that a user can set the search results per page. But we are looking for a global profile option.
In researching this option within ML found the following profile: POR: Result Set Size. But this profile doesnt change the results per page.
Does anyone have thoughts on what the correct profile is or why the POR: Result Set Size is not working as expected.
Thanks

Hi,
Thanks for your response. In Robohelp 8 there are no options for hiding the search results per page feature while generating the output. Can you please guide me. I tried removing the content from the output by commenting out the followig code from the whform.htm file. However, the text box showing 10 remains. I cannot remove that. Can you suggest?
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page" ;
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page";
if (window.gbWhForm)
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SHOWTOC);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SHOWIDX);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SHOWFTS);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SHOWGLO);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SEARCHTHIS);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_BACKUPSEARCH);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_HILITESEARCH);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_GETSEARCHSTR);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SETSYNSTR);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_GETMAXRSLT);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_SETNUMRSLT);
RegisterListener2(this, WH_MSG_GETNUMRSLT);
gfunLookUp = ftsLookup;
gfunInit = null;
gstrFormName = "FtsInputForm"
gsTitle = "Type in the word(s) to search for:";
gsTitle = "Type in the word(s) to search for:";
gsHiliteSearchTitle = "Highlight search results";
gsHiliteSearchTitle = "Highlight search results";
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page" ;
gsMaxSearchTitle = "Search results per page";
setGoImage1("wht_go.gif");
setBackgroundcolor("White");

Show results per unique identifier

Dear community,
I have stranded on something I am not sure how to figure it out.
What I want is a page which contains an empty report and a LOV. When I select something from the LOV (which is a primary key), the empty report should be filled with the information stored/related to the LOV selection.
That possible. because I could not find or get any examples for this.
Explanation:
I have a page 1.
I have a region in page 1.
I have a report in page 1.
I have a LOV item in page 1.
When LOV item selection is pressed the report should be filled with tabledata linked to the lov selection.
Thank you!

"What I need on page 1 is that I want to all results per student.
I figured out it could be done while having 1 LOV and a report based on a table ( this report automatically shows all data out of the table, which not a real problem ).
But when I select a student out of the LOV, the report should update with only the results of that student."
Let's say your LOV page item is P1_STUDENT and your Primary Key column on the table is STUDENT_ID.
Your query then would be
Select column1, 2, 3,....
FROM Student_Table
WHERE STUDENT_ID = :P1_STUDENT OR :P1_STUDENT IS NULL
This is where your "select list item fits into the query's Where Clause"So, following the previous advice to have your P1_STUDENT LOV item submit the page when it is changed by the user, your report will run and data will be selected based on its new value and the new report details will be generated.
The - OR :P1_STUDENT IS NULL - allows the report to initially run and select all rows for all student ID's

Need Help Urgently For Displaying RESULTS PER PAGE

i am comiling a serch engine throgh JSDK servlets and using a personal Oracle database. i currently have over 2000 records and when they are returned they are all being returned in one big table. i am trying to get the servlet to display so many results per page, for example 30 per page. I am at a loss on how to do this and have tried a number of methods, i urgently need to find a way of doing this as it is for a Major school project. I hope someone can help me i would be extremly greatful if someone could. Please
Thanks

Hello --
One way to do this would be something like this:
1. Start out with a page where filtering parameters could be entered, submit to the servlet with a starting position of 0.
2. Grab all the rows from the oracle database, toss them in an array.
3. Draw items in a table from the starting position to the number of entries per page from the array.
4. Put a Previous and Next button on the results page to submit back to the servlet in step 2 where the starting position is the current position - number of results per page for previous, next is the has a starting position of current position + number of results per page. You'll want to do range checking, etc on this.
The key trick is to ask one servlet to do steps 2-4. I've used hidden variables on the form with some javascript to set the new starting parameter for previous and next. You could assemble a URL in javascript also.
There are probably slicker ways to do this, but for 2000 rows, it should probably work well enough.
Good luck.
Donn

Record results per Product, not per inspection characteristic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for