Reducing the times

I am keen to know the following information and how can we reduce the times without affecting realiability..
1) How long do the messages take to reach IE from AE and what is the idle time in Java queues? Which parameter can be increased (Java Sendqueue) and what is the upper limit without affecting reliability?
2) How long do the messages spend in queues or in transit on ABAP stack? Which parameters can changed to decrease the idle time and what is the upper limits for a given resources (DIA, memory etc). (Inbound queues, balancing and whatelse?)..
3) How long do the messages spend in outbound queues or in transit to receiver AE(java)? Which parameters affect this? (outbound queue size & concurrency and what else?)
4) What is the idle time on the receiver java AE queues and what parameters can changed to decrease the idle time without causing HTTP errors? (receive queue size and what else.. java scheduler time?)

Oh ... well ... if we are going in that direction ....
be the big cheese, sweep in, wave your hands around a lot, get everyone running around and leave. Renders will be done when you arrive for your next session.
In all seriousness, Randy is right - sleep is way underrated a means of getting work done!
x

Similar Messages

Reducing the time interval in file Adpt to write a flat file at a location

Hi All,
I hav a scenario where i hav to write a flat file (XXX.txt) to a location. b4 doing that, i hav to check whether XXX.txt already exists or not. If it doesn't exists then i hav to write the XXX.txt file there. if it already exists, then i hav to wait until that xxx.txt file gets deleted.
In the receiver file adapter v hav an option file construction mode = create which does the same thing. but the problem here is it is taking too long (more than 5 min) which is not at all acceptable in my case (it is ok if it takes 1 min).
Is there any way to reduce the time interval using the same option?
Or do we hav any work around solution for acheiving the same scenario?
any help wud b appreciated.
Thnx in Adv.
Anil

Anil
As far as my knowledge goes I think it is not possible because we are not going to do anything from our end. XI is doing processing and creating a file for you. But you might be sending a large file at a time. So you have to improve the performance in your scenario. You check this urls on how to improve performance in XI:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70ada5ef-0201-0010-1f8b-c935e444b0ad
Improving performence in XI
Maximum Permitted File Size in XI
---Satish

Web report for opening it takes long time how to reduce the time?

HI Experts,
I created report using webi. For next time while opening it takes more time. How to reduce the time.

Hi Manikandan,
There could be multiple reason behind the bad performance.
1. Are you using supported JVM version to run Webi reports?
2. Do the reports contain prompts? Are the LOVs set to "Automatic refresh before use"? If yes, uncheck it.
3. How many queries do the report has? Can you run the queries one by one and check which query is taking much time?
4. If it based on relational database, copy and run it against the database directly and check how much time it takes. If more, you may have to fix the issue at database level like using temporary tables, indices, etc.
5. Also check if there are firewalls or proxy server between client and server communication. if yes, try to refresh the report directly on BO server and check.
6. Check if there is any hinderance between BO server and Database server communcation.
Hope it will help.
Regards,
Yuvraj

How to reduce the time for each clips up to 0,04 seconds?

Hi, I'm trying to realize my first time laps. I've need to reduce the time for each clips up to 0,04 seconds, but it seems that the minimum time is 0,1 second. There's a solution?

And use a zip file. Many people can't open RARs.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

How to reduce the time..?

Hi All,
this statement below is taking lot of time how can i reduce the time ....?
cheers
sundeep
select * from zausfu where vbeln in so_vbeln
                    AND wadat_ist IN so_wadat
                    AND aland IN so_eland
                    AND vsbed IN so_vsbed
                    AND vsart IN so_vsart
                    AND sdabw = sdabw_wert.
tab-aland = zausfu-aland.
tab-vbeln = zausfu-vbeln.
tab-wadat = zausfu-wadat_ist.
tab-vsart = zausfu-vsart.
tab-sdabw = zausfu-sdabw.
IF sdabw_wert = 'A'.
    tab-flag = 'X'.
ENDIF.
   anz_datensaetze = anz_datensaetze + 1.
append tab.
endselect.

Hi Sundeep,
Please use the below code, might be it will reduce the time for u r program.
Types Declaration
types: begin of ty_zausfu,
       aland type zausfu-aland,
       vbeln type zausfu-vbeln,
       wadat type zausfu-wadat_ist,
       vsart type zausfu-vsart,
       sdabw type zausfu-sdabw,
       end of ty_zausfu.
types: begin of ty_tab,
       aland type zausfu-aland,
       vbeln type zausfu-vbeln,
       wadat type zausfu-wadat_ist,
       vsart type zausfu-vsart,
       sdabw type zausfu-sdabw,
       flag(1)
       end of ty_tab.
Internal Table Declaration
data: it_zausfu type standard table of ty_zausfu initial size 0,
        it_tab type standard table of ty_tab initial size 0.
Workarea Declaration
data: is_zausfu type ty_zausfu,
        is_tab type ty_tab.
Data Declaration
      anz_datensaetze type i.
Data Read from Tables
select aland vbeln wadat_ist vsart sdabw from zausfu
into table it_zausfu
where vbeln in so_vbeln
AND wadat_ist IN so_wadat
AND aland IN so_eland
AND vsbed IN so_vsbed
AND vsart IN so_vsart
AND sdabw = sdabw_wert.
describe table it_zausfu lines anz_datensaetze.
      loop at it_zausfu into is_zausfu.
      move-corresponding is_zausfu to is_tab.
      if sdabw_wert = 'A'.
        is_tab-flag = 'X'.
      endif.
      append is_tab to it_tab.
      clear: is_zausfu, is_tab.
      endloop.
Please reward points, if it is ok.
Regards,
Subbarao

How can I reduce the time between songs to zero for seemless mixing

Hi, Ive only just got my 5th generation Ipod and was wondering if its possible to reduce the time gap between songs to zero. I.E a lot of Cd's and albums I have are mixed so it doesnt seem there is a pause between each song but when I put the cd's onto my ipod there is still a pause.
For example I have a 2 many djs album which is heavily mixed with a new song every 30 seconds so it is a bit of a nuisance if there is a pause every 30 seconds.

Your question gets asked on a daily basis, and has been answered many times. If you search for 'gapless playback' you'll see how just how many people inquire about this.
In short... the iPod does not support gapless playback.
If you want to eliminate the gaps, one workaround is to join the individual tracks together, and play them as one single track. You can do this by reimporting the CD into iTunes using the 'Join CD Tracks' feature.
See Step 3 in this article:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93079
If you'd like to send feedback to Apple to ask that they include gapless playback as a feature in future revisions of the iPod firmware, you can do so on this feedback page.

Reducing the time for a call to go to voicemail

I want to reduce the time time it takes for a call to go to voicemail. Currently the setting in Tools-Options-Calls-Voice Messages is 15 seconds. How can I reduce the time.

Yes there is a way to set up the default number of "time" not rings. Default is 20sec I have mine at 30sec (max)
Voicemail No-Answer Length
check to see vm number *#61#
Cing 61*1areacodevmnumber*1130#
First Dial *#61# to see your voice mail number (this is the number that the phone fowards the call to when there is no answer) write it down including area code
Then dial 611(VOICEMAIL NUMBER)1130# then dial or send
There should be no spaces and make sure you enter the number correctly (ie) 61*13235552323*1130# then you should see a comfirmation.

Reducing the time in Queues- IE

Hi all,
My problem is ,for picking the message from the sender queue-> IE->Receiver queue ,to pick the message from the sender queue and place in the Integration engine much time is wasted.Is there any way to decrease this time.
Kindly let me know.
Thanks,
Srini

HI
During connection establishment, the operating system must keep requests in a queue. This parameter specifies the maximum number of requests that can have this status at any one time.
If the network queue is full, the system rejects any additional connection requests without notifying the sender.
Operating System Restrictions
This parameter is handled differently by different operating systems. The maximum value for 4.2 BSD was 5. Todayu2019s systems support various values. If the operating systemu2019s maximum value is exceeded, the operating system reduces the parameter value to the maximum supported value. See also the description of operating system call listen() , Parameter backlog .
Value Range Unit Default Setting
5 - 1024 Integer 512
Note: reward points if solution found helpfull
Regards
Chandrakanth.k

How to reduce the time of compiling in FPGA?

I wrote some code for PID control by using FPGA .But only if a little change is in the code,i have to recompile the code .It takes about 15 minutes per time. It is time-consuming and terrible.
Could anyone have the good way to fix the problem?
Thanks

Unfortunately, when you compile for the actual hardware, you are generating a custom application for an entire FPGA which takes time. To reduce the design cycle, use the development features for executing your code on the desktop to quickly find functional issues. After that, you can simulate the code with Xilinx ISIM or Mentors ModelSim to find cycle-level timing issues. At that point, the code should be ready for deployment and hopefully will work on the first compile for hardware.

Can i reduce the time in startEditingTimer()?

hi group,
In startEditingTimer(),it is taking default 1800 miliseconds to start the editing again.
Can i reduce this time.?
if any help would be highly appreciated and thanks in advance.
thank u...
shalinipriya.

hi group,
the startEditingTimer() which is in DefaultTreeCellEditor class.
it will take 1800 miliseconds again to start the editor.
Can i reduce that 1800 to 100 miliseconds.?
How i can do that?
urgent please...
thank u...
Shalinipriya.

How do I reduce the time from the detection of a input threshold to changing the output?

Hi,
I am using LabWindows 8.1 and a PXI-4461 with Vista (home) on a 2.81 GHz Dual Core Processor. I wrote code to do the following:
(1) output a ramp, input a signal concurrently (precise sychronization of these two is not important at this point)
(2) if the input signal rises above 0.5 V, hold the output constant for 2 seconds, while continuing the input
(3) finish the ramp
More info: I do a continuous sampling, with 4 samples per Write, to do the output. The input is read and analyzed with RegisterEveryNSamples (where N = 4). The communication between the tasks is through a global variable "trap," which is set to 1 when threshold is reached. I achieve holding the output constant by stopping the task (maintain existing value = true), and then restarting after the pause. At 40kHz and 4 samples per Write, the limit imposed by the discrete data blocks would be 0.1 msec, but in fact I am getting delays of about 2.5 msec. My write buffer is 120x4 samples, just so that there is space for me to write. I do need to save the input data after the
acquisition, preferably the whole sweep, but most importantly the data
while the output is held constant.
So my questions are:
(a) Does it really take 2 ms to stop a task? When I put in "Timer()" functions as below, I get a difference of 0.002, which is of course limited to the resolution of the Timer() function. Returning from a function (the EveryN callback) should not take that long, right?
(b) Can you suggest any better ways of doing this?
/*****begin excerpt *****/
DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxRegisterEveryNSamplesEvent(inputTaskHandle,DAQmx_Val_Acquired_Into_Buffer,4 ,0,EveryNCallback,NULL));
DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxWriteAnalogF64(outputTaskHandle,480,0,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel,outData,&written, NULL));
DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxStartTask(inputTaskHandle));
DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxStartTask(outputTaskHandle));
 for (count =120;count<10000; count++)
 if (trap==0) {
 DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxWriteAnalogF64(gTaskHandle,4,0,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel,&outData[count*sampsToWrite],&written,NULL));
 } else {
 DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxStopTask(outputTaskHandle));
 time2 = Timer();
 done = 1;
 ProcessDrawEvents();
 ProcessSystemEvents();
 Delay (2.0);
 trap = 0;
 count++;
 DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxWriteAnalogF64(outputTaskHandle,480,0,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel,&outData[count*4],&written,NULL));
 count = count+119;
 DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxStartTask(outputTaskHandle));
/*****end excerpt *****/
int32 CVICALLBACK EveryNCallback(TaskHandle taskHandle, int32 everyNsamplesEventType, uInt32 nSamples,void *callbackData)
 DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxReadAnalogF64(taskHandle,nSamples,10.0,DAQmx_Val_GroupByScanNumber,&readData[inCount*nSamples],nSamples,&numRead,NULL));
 if (trap == 0 && done == 0) {
 for (i=0; i<nSamples; i++) {
 if (readData[inCount*nSamples+i] > 0.5) {
 trap = 1;
 time1 = Timer();
 break;
 } else done = 1;
 inCount++;
Error:
 return 0;
I would appreciate any help or advice! Thanks. (Sorry about oddities in the code.)

There are a number of applictations like Carbonite, Aperture, Entourage, VM Fusion, Parellels, etc that treat any change to the application as a complete change to application's database.
So, if you make one small email change in Entourage for example, the entire database is backed up on the next pass. As you might imagine, this can fill up a Time Capsule very quickly.
Suggest that you download a utility like BackupLoupe to find out exactly what is being backed up on each pass. Then you can exclude that item from backups if you wish.
http://soma-zone.com/BackupLoupe/

How to reduce the time of a loop

Hello,
I have a VI how generate and acquire signals via a NI-USB device.
I have lighted a bit my VI because the rest of the calculation doesn't increase the time spend in the loop. (I acquire 8 signals and i do 2 PID in the real VI)
So, the VI is made for read two hall sensor of a motor and tell me in wich position is the motor (Motor is a stepper with 20step per 360°). But I think that my VI only count from 0 to 19 ..
I have tried to decrease the values of both DAQ but then the sine wave doesn't look like sine.. The loop run at 200ms/iteration
If anyone know how to run it faster it would be great
thanks
Max
Attachments:
Loop_time.vi ‏181 KB

And use a zip file. Many people can't open RARs.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

How to reduce the time of publication in the swf from the fla in Adobe Flash Professional CS5.5?

My fla-file (27mB) is graphic resources to a project, split into pieces is very problematic.Publication time on my computer is 4 minutes. I tried setting "preferance / publish cache" - not result.

Yes Arial will always export lightning quick.
Compress movie was a chance that you used some bitmaps that might have agressive compression. Oh well.
You copied 120 symbols and received good results. Great! Try copying half your library and do the same. Soon you will find out which item is causing this gigantic halt.
Over a decade ago it took my old P4 about 5 minutes to export a movie I was making and I never knew why. It always ran very cruddy in one specific area too. I finally took a look inside one vector that was insanely complex and huge (like 3000x3000 size 8 years ago is HUGE). It was being scaled down to 5% of its size to fit on screen haha. I simply exported it to a bitmap and all of a sudden everything was fixed. Lots of these things happen. You just need to find out what part of your library is causing issues. So I'd keep copying more and more symbols while exporting until all of a sudden you copy, export and it takes forever. Then you know what the culprit is.
In my experience the 2 things that have ALWAYS caused a ridiculos amount of time to export is audio and fonts with all glyphs exported.

Reducing the time for select query

Hi
Please advise why the query is taking too much time to execute when the cost involved in the joins is less.
Here is the explain plan for the same
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 4989 | 984K| | 295K (1)| 00:59:09 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 4989 | 984K| 2120K| 295K (1)| 00:59:09 |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 984K| | 12975 (1)| 00:02:36 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 862K| | 11943 (1)| 00:02:24 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf | 993 | 22839 | | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 750K| | 11925 (1)| 00:02:24 |
|* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf453 | 145 | 2465 | | 7 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 4989 | 667K| | 11917 (1)| 00:02:24 |
|* 9 | INDEX SKIP SCAN | tedy_ehf33 | 4987 | 116K| | 4992 (1)| 00:01:00 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| tedy_7nl | 43367 | 4785K| | 6925 (1)| 00:01:24 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hfeei | 89616 | 2187K| | 1032 (1)| 00:00:13 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | tedy_hf455 | 2 | 32 | | 113 (0)| 00:00:02 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because the cost is internally calculated by the Cost Based Optimizer using the data available when parsing the query (tables, columns, constraints, cardinalities, etc...). If you feed it bad information (stale statistics, not using NOT NULL constraints, check constraints, foreign key constraints, etc..) it chooses inappropriate access methods.
Based on what you've posted, not much help is possible.
When your query takes too long ...
and
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
Will get you started on providing meaningful information with which we can help you.

How can I reduce the time it takes to save and close my TIF files?

It takes me six clicks to save my manipulated files to tif and close them. Isn't there a way of setting the tif settings so that it doesn't prompt you for them each time?

OK, let me back up a bit and make sure I'm thinking correctly about what I've done. I'll answer Shane's questions here, too.
The video clips were shot on a Panasonic PV-GS500. They are DV Movies - DV/DVCPRO - NTSC. I brought them into iMovie, then I stored them on my desktop and transferred one of them into my FCP project, which is on the external drive I mentioned above. The wav file from the H4n is also stored on my desktop, though I imported it into the project.
Is my project still referencing the original video and audio clips from my desktop? I can see how that would slow things down.

Reducing the times

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for