Referance of Original Production Order while creating Rework Order

Dear Guru,
We create rework Production Order by T.Code- CO01 with rework order Type. But i want to give the referance of Production Order for which Rework Production is being created.
Please guide me.
Regards,
Sanjay Sahoo

Dear Sanjay,
For this you have to create the rework order using CO07 (without material production order).if not using AFS SAP.
then go to Header and under Settlement rule assign the production order with that rework order.
Regards
Nitin

Similar Messages

Significance of IBase, Component and Product ID while creating Change Reque

Hello,
When we create a change request via SOLMAN_WORK_CENTER, we are supposed to provide values for
1) IBase
2) Component
3) Product ID
Ibase can be defined as the way SAP differentiates in a multiple system (APO, CRM, ECC) environment, the corresponding environment.
The values corresponding to IBase can be obtained via IB51,52 and 53 tcodes.
Can the value for IBase obtained via SMSY t code also?
What does component and Product ID signify?
Where can we get values for Component and Product ID?
Is Product ID the same as value we get from menu Option System->Status->Installation Number
Is it necessary to provide all 3 values (i.e. IBase, Component , Product ID) while creating change request?
If Not, how will SolMan identify which system the change should point to?
Or only value for Ibase is enough?
Thanks,
Vikas

Ibase can be defined as the way SAP differentiates in a multiple system (APO, CRM, ECC) environment, the corresponding environment.
The values corresponding to IBase can be obtained via IB51,52 and 53 tcodes.
Can the value for IBase obtained via SMSY t code also?
No
What does component and Product ID signify?
Product ID is not mandatory. I actually hide it in the CRMD_ORDER screen.
Where can we get values for Component and Product ID?
Is Product ID the same as value we get from menu Option System->Status->Installation Number
Component - IB52 as you already mentioned
Product ID - in a customizing table, I've seen it once but can't remember where honestly. As stated, I don't bother with the field
Is it necessary to provide all 3 values (i.e. IBase, Component , Product ID) while creating change request?
The iBase and component are mandatory, odd thing is if you enter the component without entering 1 in the iBase, SolMan will fill the 1 in for you.
If Not, how will SolMan identify which system the change should point to?
By the logical components assigned to your maintenance project. You can actually have transports for more than one production assigned to your change document. For instance you could have a BI and ECC transport assigned to the sane change document. Your tak list will have the dev, testing and production systems for each logical component assigned.
Or only value for Ibase is enough?
I was having this discussion with someone the other day. Since the logical components assigned to the mianteance project really determines what systems you can create transports for, what is the value of the component field? Best I could determine was when you use the Logon on to System action, it points to the one listed in the component field only. other than that, I'm not sure.

Co- Product Error while creating a production order

Hi,
While performing the Co-Products Approtionment at the time of creation of Production order..
we are facing a problem regarding cost apportionment I have crated a Source Structure and the cost element is assigned to that Source Structure but still iam facing this issue
kindly help me out.
the error msg is
Debit with cost element 9460404 cannot be settled.
Message no. KD549
Diagnosis
Costs/revenues exist for cost/revenue element 9460404. This cost/revenue element was given source assignment 40 in the source structure (-> settlement rule for sender -> parameters). However, there is no distribution rule with settlement type FUL for this source assignment or the total of the percentages for the rules is less than 100.
Note:
Full settlement settles all the costs and revenues which have occurred up to the settlement period and have not already been settled. In the case of periodic settlement, you can configure the settlement profile so that all the costs occurring in the settlement period are settled, or if an amount less than 100% can be settled.
Procedure
Maintain the distribution rules for source assignment 40 and settlement type FUL or use periodic settlement to settle less than 100%. Change the settlement profile for the sender as necessary.
Change settlement profile
Note:
Cost and revenue elements receive source assignment " " if you have not entered a source structure in the settlement rule parameters.

Hi Krishna Murthy I went through the note but i couldnt recive a big help from that note.
I will explain the step by step process that i have done.
I am attaching the Screen shots of the issue.
1. For co-products I have created a source structure and Sec. Cost Elements were assigned in the source structure.
2. The source structure was assigned in the Material Master for co-products equally distrubuting the amount between 2 materials.
3. When we are trying to create a production order the error was displayed but the costs was getting calculated properly.
4. When I was settling the production order the same error was getting displayed.
I have tried various methods to resolve it.
1. I have created a periodic settlement rule and tried to settle but it didnt work
2. I have assigned the source structure in the settlement profile this also didnt work.

Rework Production Order not able to confirm and no cost calculation

Hi Guys,
During rework production order confirmation system giving error message as below:
[Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001
Message no. GLT2001
Diagnosis
The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category. You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
The following error occurred for the document you entered:
Item category 01001 in accounting transaction 0000, variant 0001 is no allowed.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
Procedure for System Administration]
This error relating to New G/L split functionality such as the document type and G/L accounts document type. Doc type is using as same as normal production order and normal production order confirmations and other activities are posted successfully. Iu2019m in a puzzle, regards to this behavior of rework order?
Back ground for rework order:
Rework order was created through trigger points.
Rework order doesn't have any material, it has to pick and settle to original production order; the same was defined at re-work order settlement.
Rework order not doing any cost calculations at production order level itu2019s giving a message as below:
Object was not costed
Message no. CK060
Diagnosis
The system could not find any entries that are relevant to costing.
System Response
The system did not cost the object.
Procedure
Check whether the following objects should be flagged as relevant to costing:
- Items in the BOM
- Display BOM
- Operations in the routing
- Control key in the routing
1. Look at the message log.
2. Check whether a quantity was specified in the confirmation.
Will some one throw some light to come out from this situation and what I missed out and what need to be maintained exactly Plz.
Thanks in advanceu2026Vyas

Hi Mangalraj,
Have check the BOM & Routing for Parent production order costing check box is for both. Coming to rework order doesn't have any material, though it has pulled the some material cost from parent production order. The same can see at production order costs>analysis, but where as costs>itemization not able to see and mesage issued like: object was not costed.
as early mentioned, confirmation level same error.
Hope this may give some idea on this case, thanks for your time on this.
Looking forward some light.
Thanks...Vyas

Production Order settlement issue

Hi ,
We are planning to do re-work . We want to capture the labor activties for the order. Is it possible to settle the labor activties only for the order settlement ?
Thanks
Nic

Hi Nick,
From a business stand point you have two options to follow:
1. settle the costs to the original Production order
2. Settle the costs to seperate cost center
for both cases, you need to have seperate Production Order type. Because the settlement paratment are different from regular production order type.
So please use seperate Production order type with settlement profile being settlement to Cost Center.
Hope this will solve your issue
Best Regards
Surya

Settlement in production order

Dear firends,
I have a settlement rule in the reprocess production order. where it settles the order cost to the original production order. It 100% works fine.
there is a cost element which collects all the cost on the order.
Can i ignore one cost element from it.
Please advice.

Hi,
Thanks alot for your help.
my consern is this
72204     Stock Transfer Fnished Goods          0.00     0.06-     0.06-          USD
72204     Stock Transfer Fnished Goods          0.00     576.11     576.11          USD
100     Reprocess order settlement     1380100     0.00     620.24-     620.24-          USD
90091     Lab Testing     QUALITY/M00013     0.15     0.00     0.15-     100.00-     USD
               0.15     44.19-     44.34-          USD
90010     Machine Cost Preperation     KNITTING/M00003     0.00     1.43     1.43          USD
90060     Finishing MachineCost Stenter     FINISHING/M00007     0.00     42.76     42.76          USD
Finishing Prod Cost               0.00     44.19     44.19          USD
               0.15     0.00     0.15-          USD
to my cost elsement 100, I want to ignore the cost of 72204 cost.
How can i do this.
PubuduS

Error in BDC using 'N' mode while creating production order

Hi,
I am trying to create a production order ( transaction CO01 ) by using a BDC. I just have to fill the header details, components , assign the component to operation , save and exit. When I am running the BDC in 'A' or 'E' mode, it works fine. The 'E' mode doesnt stop anywhere and successfully creates the production order . But when I change the mode to 'N', it throws an error "No batch input data for the screen SAPLCOKO1 0115". I am using Call transaction in BDC to create the production order. What could be the issue? Can someone throw some light?
Thanks,
Suganya

Hi Suganya,
I guess that Chandra Madapati is right. I also faced the same issue for another transaction.
If you want to disable the batch input (sy-binpt), you can use the addition OPTIONS FROM in call transaction statement.
It refers to the structure CTU_PARAMS in ABAP dictionary and contains the following components:
Component
Meaning
DISMODE
Processing mode for batch input processing. Values as for the MODE addition.
UPMODE
Processing mode for batch input processing. Values as for the UPDATE addition.
CATTMODE
CATT mode for batch input processing. CATT means Computer Aided Testtool. While batch input is mostly used for data transfer, CATT processes are to be viewed as more complex transactions, since they are reusable tests. Values: " " (no CATT mode), "N" (CATT without single screen control), "A" (CATT with single screen control).
DEFSIZE
Selection as to whether the screens of the called transaction are displayed in the standard screen size. Values "X" (standard size), " " (current size).
RACOMMIT
Selection as to whether the COMMIT WORK statement terminates batch input processing or not. Values: " " (COMMIT WORK terminates processing), "X" ( COMMIT WORK does not terminate processing).
NOBINPT
Selection for the symbol field sy-binpt. Values: " " (sy-binpt contains in the called transaction "X"), "X" (sy-binpt contains in the called transaction " ").
NOBIEND
Selection for the system field sy-binpt. Values: " " (sy-binpt contains "X" after the end of the batch input data in the called transsaction ) "X" (sy-binpt contains " " after the end of the batch input data in the called transaction).
In this, if you give NOBINPT as 'X', the system field sy-binpt becomes disabled. You can also set the processing mode and update mode using DISMODE and UPMODE respectively.
Thanks & Regards,
T. Prasanna Kumar

Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
Let me give you a brief background.
This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
Supply area is created for WM location.
Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
Following are the settings which I have already checked:
1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
Thanks

Hi Mike,
I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
1.
System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
2.
There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
3.
Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
Regards,
Csaba

Error while creating Production order without BOM

Hi Guys,
While creating production order without a BOM i am getting the following error in the error log.
Error: BOM for material xxxxxx does not contain any valid items
Message no. CO636
Kindly help.
Regards,
Sid

Dear customer,
could you check in the master data screen of the order if one BOM has been selected?
please coudl you check your customizing the following transactions:
OPJM
OPJI
what do you have in 'BOM slection field' MRP4 view of the header material?
Please check if with this info you can find the missing data to explode the BOM
regards
Maria

Error while creating planned order in product view

I am getting following error when I try to create planned order for a product in a Location manually in product view using /SAPAPO/RRP5.
Error occurred while creating order
Message no. /SAPAPO/RRP251
I checked the product and resource. Everything looks good.
Block is available in the resource WMP1_2041_001 for characteristics specified in planned order.
Product master and PDS look good.
In the planning log, I see the following error message.
Plan explosion failed for product LBRA1050-661 in location 2041
Message no. /SAPAPO/RRP718
I have not found SAP notes for above error.
Can you pl let me know what this is due to?
Thanks,
Srini

Srini,
The message was created as a result of several notes, such as 1582997. There are others.
The implication is that you have an invalid source somewhere in your BOM. Maybe a bad component part, maybe a bad transportation lane, maybe an invalid BOM, or maybe a bad PPM/PDS.
If you can't find the problem using logical troubleshooting steps, have one of your programmers debug. Have him put breakpoints in FM /SAPAPO/RRP_PLORD_CREATE . If you are particularly lucky, you will find a developer that understands German, because all the internal comments in this FM are in German.
Best regards,
DB49

Error while creating Production Order

HI Experts,
While creating a production order for a material with planning stratagy 82, I am getting an error saying "Error occured in number assignment for object" AUF_PLAN.
Can you pls tell me what was the exact problem!!
Regards
Prasanna

Prasanna,
Just a basic doubt, when you are saying that the material is assigned with Planning strategy "82", what is the need to create a Production Order manually? I am not sure whether this has an effect at all...but lets try.
Remove the strategy from Material Master MRP 3 view and then try creating the Production Order with Order type PP04, as you were trying earlier. This is just to see whether is this something related to Order type definations or Assembly Processing.
You also try creating a sales order, when the planning strategy "82" is still exists is the material master to see whether production order is getting created automatically by system.
Please let us know the feedback on the above
Regards,
Prasobh

Error message while creating production order with KMAT material strategy25

Hi PP Gurus I am running variant configuration cycle...Strategy 25, Custermer Req KEK (KMAT Matrl)
Sales order & MRP Picked the components correctly as per the dependencies
written. So Planned order generated against sale order.
When I tried to convert planned order to Production order...I am getting the
below error message..
Error Message:
You cannot make an assignment to make-to-order stock Message no. CO684
Diagnosis The component cannot be allocated to an individual stock because
make-to-order production and engineer-to-order production cannot be executed
with this order.
A possible cause is that you are trying to create an order with reference to a
sales-order/project, where an account assignment to a sales order/project is not
allowed in the settlement profile that is assigned to the chosen order type.
This is inconsistant.
System response The following responses are possible:
Order processing is cancelled.
The system resets the special stock indicator back to the original value.
Procedure Choose another order type.
I used order type with SD1 as settelement profile.
OVZG: default 046, settlement profile = SD1
OPJH: Settlement profile = SD1
Plz through some light on this if u have worked on Variant Configuration/MTO
settlements.
Question:
1) Is creation of production order with KMAT material supported by SAP?
2) If yes, why the above error occurs?
Waiting for Ur reply
With Best Regards

Dear R.Brahmankar,
I have check on the note, but it is not relevant to ecc6. The current system default setting is :
Standrad setting for reqt class 046
Special Stock E
Acct Assgt Cat. M
Valuation M
Settlmt Profile SD1
However if I change the Acct Assgt Cat. from M to E. It resolve the problem. I would like to know is this the right solution?
Config in Acct Assgt M
Consumption Posting = E
Config in Acct Assgt E
Consumption Posting = ' '
In F1 key of Consumption Posting field it shown following:
To flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, enter an "E" (settlement via sales order).
If you do not wish to flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying, do not enter anything.
Dependencies
If you are working with nonvaluated sales order stock, always flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying.
If you are working with valuated sales order stock:
In the case of complex make-to-order production, flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
In the case of sales-order-related mass production, do not flag the sales order item as cost- and revenue-carrying
Should we change to E?
Regards,
Ong

Serial number error while creating the production order

Hello frds,
I am getting the following error while creating the production order.
"Item 000000 requires exactly 100 serial numbers for the asset".
If i give 100 serial numbers in the order, the error is solved. But i do not want to assign 100 serial numbers, i want to assign only 2 numbers.
I have tried using the new serial number profile also, but it is giving same error.
Kindly guide.
Regards,
Narendra Bora

Dear Narendra
Select the serial number profile and go to serialization procedure and set the ser. usage status 02 - Optional as below.
Procd Procedure description Ser.Usage
PPRL PP order release 02
since the serail number creation is optional for order relase this will allow you to relase with out error and with serail number assigned in partial.
Regards
Soundar

Bins problem while creating goods receipt for production order.

Hi All,
          I am facing a problem with selection of bins while creating goods receipt for production order in transaction MB31 and MBBE.
The order of filling bins is with respect to storage Unit not by document no, Please suggest something.
The scene is like that.
The bins are not filled in the proper sequence, the system checks for the empty bins and filled those later on.
like this,.
Typ StorageBin SC SS    Stock Avail.st BUn GR Date    DocumentNo Storage Unit         Time
SLoc Batch      Re IA PutawayS Pick qty Cert. No.
VN1 106A088                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739297 1005721391           10:00:59
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 107B076                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739298 1005721392           10:01:01
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 108B076                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739299 1005721393           10:01:04
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 109A077                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739300 1005721394           10:01:06
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 110B079                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739301 1005721395           10:01:08
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 106B088                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739302 1005721403           10:01:11
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 123B158                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739303 1005721389           10:01:13
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 124A160                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739304 1005721390           10:01:15
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 118A133                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739305 1005721396           10:01:17
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 119A128                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739306 1005721397           10:01:20
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 120B162                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739307 1005721398           10:01:22
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 121B159                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739308 1005721399           10:01:24
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 122B159                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739309 1005721400           10:01:26
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 123B159                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739310 1005721401           10:01:29
100 0001020069            60        0
VN1 124B160                 0        0 CS 01/25/2010    4739311 1005721402           10:01:31
100 0001020069            60        0
Thnks you,
Anmol.
Edited by: anmol112 on Jan 25, 2010 10:34 PM

no replay, clossing threat.

Price error message while creating production order- Urgent

In past i was getting warning message of 'No price could be determined for material/batch and Plant" message no CK 465 at the time of saving the production order after creation but now it has stopped even though there is no price in material amster.
I changed the configuration to Error message (TC: OPR4_PPCO) and it works but why not for warning message?
Thanks

Please confirm where i should check for Activity price?
But then why we are able to get error message.
Reexplain:
Creating a production order which do not have standard cost in material master.
While saving, getting a error message'No price could be determined.......'
Now changing the message to Warning through configuration using TC: OPR4_PPCO
Now again creating the production order and saving
Expectation to have same message as warning but not getting anything.
Thanks
Edited by: vineet garg on May 1, 2008 12:14 AM

Referance of Original Production Order while creating Rework Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for