Reg: Workitem forwarding issue in SC workflow

Hi,
     I have a problem in Shopping cart workflow.
When I try to forward the work item, the system is allowing me to forward it to only one person.
     I have two options. Please help me to achieve any of the two options.
Option1 : To forward it to list of users
Option2 : To forward it to an org.unit.
     For the first option, I dont have to facility to add two or more users.
     For the second option, I need to enable the search facility to search for org.units.
     Please help me to achieve any of this two options.
With Thanks and Regards
Ravishankar Vembu.

Hi,
Option1 : To forward it to list of users
To forward it to list of users. say for example 5 users.
in SU01d, the email should be common e mail
test at the rate of usa.com for all the 5 users
.So when you are forwarding the email to test at the rate of usa.com it will go to all the 5 users.
Please try it will work
G.Ganesh Kumar

Similar Messages

  • Reg: Workitem forwarding issue in SC workflow to a org unit

    Hi,
         I have a problem in Shopping cart workflow.
    When I try to forward the work item, the system is allowing me to forward it to only one person.
         I have two options. Please help me to achieve any of the two options.
    Option1 : To forward it to list of users
    Option2 : To forward it to an org.unit.
         For the first option, I dont have to facility to add two or more users.
         For the second option, I need to enable the search facility to search for org.units or convert this search into a collectiv search.
         Please help me to achieve any of this two options.
    With Thanks and Regards
    Ravishankar Vembu.
    Edited by: ravishankar vembu on Oct 30, 2008 1:58 PM

    Hi,
    Option1 : To forward it to list of users
    To forward it to list of users. say for example 5 users.
    in SU01d, the email should be common e mail
    test at the rate of usa.com for all the 5 users
    .So when you are forwarding the email to test at the rate of usa.com it will go to all the 5 users.
    Please try it will work
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Workitem forwarding issue

    Some of the end user in PRD is unable to forward his pending leave request (WI) to their manager, instead of workitem going
    to their manager's inbox it goes to their own inbox. When I checked in the workflow log the error message shows "User ABCD is not a dialog user: Not possible to forward". But user ABCD ( To whom it has to be forwarded) is a dialog user (checked in SU01d). User is forwarding the workitem through a custom service that uses FM :SAP_WAPI_FORWARD_WORKITEM. But when we ( support team) forward the workitem by using same FM, we are able to forward it.
    It seems the issue is related to missing authorization but unable to find out what authorization is missing. No result  in
    su53.

    SAP_WAPI_FORWARD_WORKITEM is RFC Funtion module.
    Henace they are facing issue in forwarding.
    But at the same time..if you are trying to forward..its like a normal FM.
    so please check the RFC destination...

  • WorkItems forwarding issues in shopping cart approvals

    A Deputy Manager tried to forward a workitem to a Review Officer who he has just forwarded a different workitem to, but could not find the same Review Officer in the list any longer.
    Can any one help me in fixing this issue
    Agukab

    hi,
    it is not clear of what is the real problem.
    can you please be a bit clear  of the issue and i will be able to help you.
    regards

  • Workitem forwarding

    Hi All,
    I searched threads regarding workitem forwarding, but cldnt get one related to my issue.
    This WF is related to archiving invoice.
    On scanning of invoice, WF triggers, sends workitem to AP,
    AP executes workitem, screen is in edit mode. Due to some discrepancey, AP routes it to User1.
    User1 receives workitem, executes it, now the same screen shd b in display mode with just 2 fields enabled.
    My question is,
    is there such a standard WF available similar to my case?
    can a workitem forwarded from one user which was on edit mode, changed to display mode with just 2 fields enabled for the next user ?
    Thanks,
    Aditya

    Hi Aditya,
    There is no such workflow to satisfy your requirement. But I did the same thing in my workflow.
    There is one field wi_forw_by into the table SWWWIHEAD, if you forward the workitem to another user then this field will be X. Based on this flag you can disable or enable the screen fields which you want.
    Please give reward point if it is useful.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prashant Raichurkar

  • Home Hub 3 Port Forwarding Issue - Question to BT

    Question to BT
    Hello i have recently joined BT Infinity and have hit the issue of the Port Forwarding not working. My HH3 is on the following version of software. Will this version automatically upgrade to the latest version of firmware and will this fix my port forwarding issue?
    As i work in IT (Cisco Network Eng) i need to be able to access several devices/services at home and this is a real pain for me. If you think that this could drag on as some posts have indicated could you please let me know and i will either get a draytek or throw in a cisco 1841.
    Thank you
    Dean.
    Current firmware:
    V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B
    Last updated:
    Unknown

    requiem wrote:
    Question to BT
    Hello i have recently joined BT Infinity and have hit the issue of the Port Forwarding not working. My HH3 is on the following version of software. Will this version automatically upgrade to the latest version of firmware and will this fix my port forwarding issue?.........
    Thank you
    Dean.
    Current firmware:
    V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B
    Last updated:
    Unknown
    Hi Dean
    By the look of it you've got the type B version of the HH3 with current firmware.
    From http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/13073
    The latest versions of the firmware are:
    BT Home Hub 3 – Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.57.1.3 (Type A) or V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B
    Please Click On any Text in Blue as that automatically links to information.
    PC (NDEGR)

  • Issue Transporting Business workflow from one System to Another

    Hi All,
    As there are many limitations in Import/Export of Workflow I'm going for a Transport of Workflow from one sytem to another.
    There are some query's reagrding transporting of the Business Workflow through Transport Request.
    1)   How can get the Transport Request no. of the Workflow to be transported? (As there are no direct versions displayed from  menu).
    2)   If there are any dependent objects first how to find the dependent objects lof workflow like if  any data element, Domain, Table, Structure (if these objects are used in your WF definition or may be BOR method), Function module, function group BOR, Rule, WF template, task and Task assignment  ?
    3) How to get Transport Request no. of such dependent objects specifically The Task,Rule , WF template etc.?
    4) I have object Type ZBUS2081 related to it how can i get its TR ?
    Please describe as I'm new to workflow.
    Please identify if there can be some issues after transporting workflow .
    Regards,
    Ujjwal

    Hi Ujjwal,
    Please find the below hint's.
    1. Regarding the objects included in the Transport request check the Tables - E070*.
    2. For dependent objects, you should check the workflow template. You have to check all the Task's and in the task go to
       utilities ---> Object directory entry --> Lock overview . Here you can see the request. It will show you the current request for    the Task.
    3. To get the TR for Business object, Go to basic data ---> Transport data --> Here you can see the Request ID for the business object.
    Thanks,
    Viji.

  • Urgent: Issue in Automatic workflow Customizing.

    hi,
    Can someone please help me with this issue in Automatic workflow customizing ( SWU3)
    When I try to execute the step
    Maintain Runtime Environment > Schedule Background Jobs with missed deadlines
    I get the error message saying
    "Output Device "" not known"
    Can someone help me how to resolve this? This is very urgent for me.
    Regards,
    Sam K

    The guidelines tell you not use the word urgent in your message title, so please don't. Personally I  try to not answer such questions until at least one day has passed, giving you some time to cool off and perhaps solve the problem on your own.
    I can't recall seing this message myself, but my guess is that either your user or the user WF-BATCH (if the job is being scheduled with that user) has a default printer (output device) that is not defined in the system.

  • Agent determination issue in a workflow

    Greetings everyone!
    I'm configuring some business scenario with the help of a business workflow in SAP CRM 7.0 I'm using activity step and want to determine agents using standard SAP rule 10000162 ("Employees for responsible org. unit"). I've tested the rule outside of the workflow and it's working fine, but  in workflow it fails to determine an agent.
    In a log I see following errors:
    Agent determination for step '0000000023' failed;
    Result of agent resolution does not agree with agents of task;
    I've made some tests depending on what assignment task has:
    1. When it is a general task, work item was created for a workflow initiator even though rule failed to determine an agent.
    2. When it is a task with general forwarding with assigned position(s), which rule will never determine, work item was created for holder(s) of that position(s).
    3. When it is a task with general forwarding with no assignments, workflow could not determine an agent as expected.
    I've also debugged functional module for that rule and it determines appropriate agent but then do some check with the help of RH_TASK_AGENT_CHECK function and returns an error.
    Can someone help me with this problem? Is it some standard expected behavior or not?
    Maybe something wrong with the org. plan?
    All answers are appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Alex.

    Hello Rick and Eddie.
    I've tried to assign user directly instead of position to a task with no help. I get the same result.
    I've tried to set a task as a general task and made the rule to fail if there is no resolution and it fails.
    I've tried to assign position or user directly to activity in a workflow and it does work but that's not what I need in my scenario.
    As I said earlier I've tried to debug that rule invoked from a workflow. I will post some screenshots for you.
    I set a task as a general task and assigned rule 10000162 (ABBR="PARTNER_1", Name="Employees for responsible org. unit") to activity step in a workflow and here is what I get:
    1. Function CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 gets called by the rule and resp. sales org. unit is passed there ([screenshot1|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug1.png])
    2. Next function CRM_ORGUNIT_GETEMPLOYEES gets called passing id of a resp. sales org.unit without a type.
    3. Next RH_STRUC_GET gets called and returns result table with position and central person for that position ([screenshot2|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug2.png])
    4. In the end of CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 function only central person in inserted to the actor_tab ([screenshot3|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug3.png])
    5. After CRM_ORGMAN_ORGOBJECTS_FIND_2 ends we appear in a RH_GET_ACTORS function where we can see that agent check is performed if act_task is not initial. I assume that check is not performed if we do a simulation of a rule ([screenshot4|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug4.png])
    6. Then RH_TASK_AGENT_CHECK function gets called for every record in a actor_tab. In out particular case it's one record. ([screenshot5|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug5.png])
    7. Inside that function checks act_wi_id (activity work item id?) if it's initial and get exluded agents. It is initial in my case ([screenshot6|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug6.png])
    8. Then function tries to read table with keys equal to type and id of found agent and errors there, perhaps because there is no record in that table ([screenshot7|http://www.picdrop.net/?v=debug7.png])
    That error results in overall agent determination failure.
    Hope this screenshots will help to identify a problem.
    Why read table results in an error and because of that all rule fails?
    Regards,
    Alex.

  • Quantum Gateway Port Forwarding issues

    This post can be removed.... the port forwarding worked once I set it up under "Advanced Settings -> Network Settings ->Port Forwarding" instead of "Firewall -> Port Forwarding"
    Hello,
    I am having an issue setting up port forwarding.  I have made several attempts to make port forward TCP 8096, but it continues not to work.  I had it working with no problems at my with my old router before we moved so I know it's not an issue with my computer firewall or antivirus and MediaBrowser is working fine on the local network. Is anyone else experiencing Port Forwarding issues?  Also when will DMZ be enabled on this gateway?
    Any help would be apprciated. I'm trying to setup MediaBrowser so I can schedule recordings when i'm not at home.
    Thanks!
    Armyb77
    This post can be removed

    See kayster contribution here.
    SYNOLOGY DS214 - Remote access via BT Home Hub
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • Post Moved Mac Port Forwarding Issues

    Post Moved to Other BB Queries http://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/Mac-Port-Forwarding-issues/td-p/550779
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

    Does this help...?
    http://community.bt.com/t5/Other-BB-Queries/Port-forwarding-and-Loopback-DO-work-YMMV/m-p/538328

  • WRTU54G-TM Port Forward issues, DHCP server disabled but still gives out addresses

    I've seen other posts about port-forwarding issues.  I've had to hard-reset the device twice in 2 months to clear this up.
    One issue that I can't figure out at all is that the DHCP server gives out addresses when it is set to disabled.  This is a problem because it gives out the public DNS servers, which will not resolve addresses on my LAN.  Anyone else seen this?
    Anyone had success putting this router behind a better one and still getting the phone SIM to register and work? 

    Have you tried to upgrade the firmware on your Router?
    Click Download  the latest firmware for your Router and save the Firmware file on your Desktop. 
    Once you Download the firmware for your Router, Now you need to login to the Router setup page and click on the "Administration" tab and below click on "Firmware Upgrade" and then click on the Browse Button and select the firmware file and click on Upgrade. 
    Once the firmware is upgraded successfully then you need to Reset your Router and Re-configure all the settings on your Router from scratch. 

  • Iplanet/Servlet Forwarding Issue/Question

    Scenario:
    A directory is protected using Iplanet web server access control (Iplanet Directory Server). User accesses the directory and enters valid user name and password. User is authenticated OK. The file is then posted to a servlet which does a forward to another page in the same directory. The page is not displayed due to a problem with authentication. Code to forward is as follows:
    getServletConfig().getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher(response.encodeURL(pageName)).forward(request,response);
    I check request.getUserPrincipal().getName() and
    request.getRemoteUser(). The first returns the username that iWS is running under, the second returns
    null. Is there a correct way of doing this to avoid the forward from failing.

    requiem wrote:
    Question to BT
    Hello i have recently joined BT Infinity and have hit the issue of the Port Forwarding not working. My HH3 is on the following version of software. Will this version automatically upgrade to the latest version of firmware and will this fix my port forwarding issue?.........
    Thank you
    Dean.
    Current firmware:
    V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B
    Last updated:
    Unknown
    Hi Dean
    By the look of it you've got the type B version of the HH3 with current firmware.
    From http://bt.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/13073
    The latest versions of the firmware are:
    BT Home Hub 3 – Software version 4.7.5.1.83.8.57.1.3 (Type A) or V100R001C01B031SP09_L_B
    Please Click On any Text in Blue as that automatically links to information.
    PC (NDEGR)

  • Weird CSS forwarding Issue

    Hi all.
    I am having some weird forwarding issue using a pair of 11503 CSS (Box-to-box redundancy).
    Here is my L3 network topology:
    Internet
    |
    | CP FW-1 |
    |
    |
    |6500-Sup720|
    |
    |
    | CSS 11503 |
    |
    |
    |
    Client
    I have drawn only one device because redundancy is achieved via HSRP on 6500, Active/Standby on CSS.
    Moreover, L2 connectivity is provided by 2 4507 (CSS are connected 1 x 4500 on different vlans), connected to the 6500 via gigabit fiber connections.
    A LDAP server is located on the internet and when the client tries to issue an LDAP query, it could take up to 2 minutes to have the reply back (20 seconds in the best cases). If I move the L3 on the 4500 or the 6500, the request takes form 1 to 2 seconds to complete.
    We have tried both CSS, both 4500, both 6500, different clients with the same results. We upgraded the WebNS to the latest release (7.50.004). We changed physical cables, physical ports on CSS and switches, moved clients on other vlans on CSS, 4500 and 6500 and the results are always the same.
    Neither errors on CSS interfaces, nor on 4500 interfaces, nor on 6500 interfaces.
    I captured traffic via snoop on the Sun Client, and also with monitoring session on catalyst 4500, and when the CSS is routing, I can see lots of duplicate acks, tcp out of sequence, retransmissions which disappear when routing is performed by 6500 or 4500.
    I was wondering if there is anything connected to the L3 1500 bytes size of every frames (the query produces an output of about 600k). We are at the L3 MTU limit... We also tried with ftp, but in that case everything was fine also with CSS. It looks like there something ldap related at least. The ldap query is a normal query, tcp port 389. The command come and go very well, the actual data transfer produces all the crappy tcp output (retransmission, lost segments ecc...).
    I am very confused, CSS is not balancing, it's only forwarding traffic.
    Sorry for my long post, any help will be really appreciated!
    Regards
    Massimo Magnani.

    From your statements i understand that you want to know how to load balance using CSS. Content rules are where the CSS's load balancing features are customized, virtual IP address are defined, and where the actual servers (called services) are bound to that virtual IP address. Content rules allow you to specify load balancing types, sticky methods, port specific Virtual IP addresses, and a host of other features Refer to the following URL to understand how CSS load balancing works and how CSS load balancing can be configured.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a008009438d.shtml

  • Approval Workflow Forwarding issue

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing a unique problem. We are using SRM5.0 with ECC6.0 as backend. We have a n-step BADI workflow implemented for approval of shopping carts. Let us say, I created a shopping cart which is to be approved by X and then by Y. Now, if the approver X forwards this approval mail (either from SAP inbox or from his external mail id) to another user Z, then on complete approval, the approval preview in the shopping cart shows only user Y as the approver of the SC. Neither user X nor Z are shown as approver nor does it show that Z has approved the shopping cart.
    Why is this happening? Is this a SAP-standard procedure?  How do I correct this such that the shopping cart shows that user Z has approved it?
    Could anyone please throw some light on this issue? Will be really grateful...
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ancy

    Hi,
      Once the SC is approved by Z and Y, the approval preview must be display both approvers.. if this is not happen.. then check the OSS note.. what is your SP Level?

Maybe you are looking for