Regarding Best approach

Hi ,
We have a fact table in which 34 merge where there with 34 different dimensional table to update the 34 different facts.So we are hitting the fact table 34 times with 34 different dimesional table.So What is the best approach to hit once and update the 34 facts in single hit.Kindly give your suggestions/best approach..

We have a fact table in which 34 merge where there with 34 different dimensional table to update the 34 different facts.Are you talking about 34 fact tables, or
So we are hitting the fact table 34 times with 34 different dimesional table.A single FACT table getting updated 34 times?
So What is the best approach to hit once and update the 34 facts in single hit.Kindly give your suggestions/best approach..First question is why are you updating?
Why cant you fill the keys during INSERT ?
The normal/best practice is to populate the keys during INSERT. Do an outer join on all the dimensions when you select data from the source to find out the keys..

Similar Messages

  • COST CENTER CHANGES FOR OPEN PO REQUIRE BEST APPROACH HOW TO DO IT

    Dear All,
    we are changing the cost center for open PO's kindly tell us the best approach how to do it for all open PO's line items for open PO's are 4000.
    we will totally block the old PO's and change the PO's with NO GR and IR immediately, but what and how to do for if there are GR, IR, or one of them their. and also what if IR and GR differences are thier, kindly provide all the best possible approaches.
    below are the scenarios.
    Open PO without GR/IR
    Open PO only with GR
    Open PO only with IR
    Open PO with IR/GR without difference
    Open PO with IR/GR with differences
    Service entry sheet
    kindly provide me all the best approaches to achieve this task. keep in mind beside reversal of GR or IR any other approach.
    qsm sap
    Edited by: qsm sap on Feb 15, 2010 12:08 PM

    Hi,
    Open PO without GR/IR
    Open PO only with GR
    Make Acct assigment as changeable at time of IR in SPRO for Acct Assigmet 'K' ...so that u can change the cost Center while doing MIRO. if u do not want to go with mass change.
    Service entry sheet
    You can change Cost center while Doing SES. No issue
    for others... reverse the IR as one option.
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • COST CENTER CHNAGES FOR OPEN PO"S BEST APPROACH

    Dear All,
    we are changing the cost center for open PO's kindly tell us the best approach how to do it for all open PO's line items for open PO's are 4000.
    we will totally block the old PO's and change the PO's with NO GR and IR immediately, but what and how to do for if there are GR, IR, or one of them their. and also what if IR and GR differences are thier, kindly provide all the best possible approaches.
    below are the scenarios.
    Open PO without GR/IR                    
    Open PO only with GR                    
    Open PO only with IR                    
    Open PO with IR/GR without difference          
    Open PO with IR/GR with differences          
    Service entry sheet
    kindly provide me all the best approaches to achieve this task.
    qsm sap

    Hi,
    Open PO without GR/IR
    Open PO only with GR
    Make Acct assigment as changeable at time of IR in SPRO for Acct Assigmet 'K' ...so that u can change the cost Center while doing MIRO. if u do not want to go with mass change.
    Service entry sheet
    You can change Cost center while Doing SES. No issue
    for others... reverse the IR as one option.
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 Upgrade - Best Approach?

    Hi,
    We have to upgrade R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0
    We have to do th DB, Unicode and R/3 upgrade. I want to know what are the best approaches available and what risks are associated iwth each approach.
    We have been considering the following approaches (but need to understand the risk for each approach).
    1) DB and Unicode in 1st and then R/3 upgrade after 2-3 months
    I want to understand that if we have about 700 Include Program changing as part of unicode conversion, how much of the functional testing is required fore this.
    2) DB in 1st step and then Unicode and R/3 together after 2-3 months
    Does it makes sense to combine Unicode and R/3 as both require similar testing? Is it possible to do it in 1 weekend with minimum downtime. We have about 2 tera bytes of data and will be using 2 systems fdor import and export during unicode conversion
    3) DB and R/3 in 1st step and then Unicode much later
    We had discussion with SAP and they say there is a disclaimer on not doing Unicode. But I also understand that this disclaimer does not apply if we are on single code page. Can someone please let us know if this is correct and also if doing Unicode later will have any key challenges apart from certain language character not being available.
    We are on single code pages 1100 and data base size is about 2 tera bytes
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul
    regarding your 'Unicode doubt"' some ideas:
    1) The Upgrade Master Guide SAP ERP 6.0 and the Master Guide SAP ERP 6.0 include introductory information. Among other, these guides reference the SAP Service Marketplace-location http://service.sap.com/unicode@sap.
    2) In Unicode@SAP can you find several (content-mighty) FAQs
    Conclusion from the FAQ: First of all your strategy needs to follow your busienss model (which we can not see from here):
    Example. The "Upgrade to mySAP ERP 2005"-FAQ includes interesting remarks in section "DO CUSTOMERS NEED TO CONVERT TO A UNICODE-COMPLIANT ENVIRONMENT?"
    "...The Unicode conversion depends on the customer situation....
    ... - If your organization runs a single code page system prior to the upgrade to mySAP ERP 2005, then the use of Unicode is not mandatory. ..... However, using Unicode is recommended if the system is deployed globally to facilitate interfaces and connections.
    - If your organization uses Multiple Display Multiple Processing (MDMP) .... the use of Unicode is mandatory for the mySAP ERP 2005 upgrade....."
    In the Technical Unicode FAQ you read under "What are the advantages of Unicode ...", that "Proper usage of JAVA is only possible with Unicode systems (for example, ESS/MSS or interfaces to Enterprise Portal). ....
    => Depending on the fact if your systems support global processes, or depending on your use of Java Applications, your strategy might need to look different
    3) In particular in view of your 3rd option, I recommend you to take a look into these FAQs, if not already done.
    Remark: mySAP ERP 2005 is the former name of the application, which is named SAP ERP 6.0, now
    regards, and HTH, Andreas R

  • Best approach for IDOC - JDBC scenario

    Hi,
    In my scenarion I am creating sales order(ORDERS04) in R/3 system and which need to be replicated in a SQL Server system. I am sending the order to XI as an IDoc and want to use JDBC for sending data to SQL Server. I need to insert data in two tables(header & details). Is it possible without BPM?  Or what is the best approach for this?
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Yes, this is possible without the BPM.
    Just create the Corresponding Datatype for the insertion.
    if the records to be inserted are different, then there wil be 2 different datatypes ( one for header and one for detail).
    Do a mutlimapping, where your Source is mapped into the header and details datatype and then send using the JDBC sender adapter.
    For the strucutre of your Datatype for insertion , just check this link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7e/5df96381ec72468a00815dd80f8b63/content.htm
    To access any Database from XI, you will have to install the corresponding Driver on your XI server.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3867a582-0401-0010-6cbf-9644e49f1a10
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Best approach to "migrate" from BEX reports to Webi reports ?

    Hello,
    i have read lots of documents regarding best practices on how to built webi reports and universes on top of BW.
    But i can't find any document about best approach, not in performance way of thinking but in best way of using reports.
    i mean: when end users are coming from bex reports (where they can drill down through hierarhies and use free filters ) to webi reports (where layout is quite beatiful and user can change it easely), this is not the same way of consuming reports.
    I come from BO world and are new on reporting on top of BW.
    for me webi is good for quite static layout reporting where data is clear and available.of course you can have prompts for interactivy and more accurate reporting.  Drill down is just a functionality but is not the real purpose of the report tool.
    So ,according to me there is a gap between both tools (BEX and WEBI) but end users are the same.
    So i 'm wondering if you have any feedback for the best approach to build webi reports where end users are coming from bex reporting.
    And how to choose between prompts, drill-down (with available filters on top of the window), fold/unfold and input controls or just having diffrent levels of hierarchies in the table/ section/ breaks but without drill down (because if you drill down, report begins weird with diffrent levels) ...?
    So , if you have any feedback , advise....
    thanks in advance,
    Rgds,

    Hi,
      WEBI don't replace BEX reports, is for different audience, in fact BEX is for OLAP reports and analysis.
      You can find some answer in this page
    [FAQ: The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI & Business Objects Roadmap|FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap [original link is broken]|FAQ]
    spercific for What is the future of the BEx Query Designer? you can read here
    [FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap [original link is broken]#section11] and here [FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap [original link is broken]#section3]
      The idea is to use the rigth tool for the rigth job.
      You can find more information here [http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/edw], [http://www.sap.com/solutions/sapbusinessobjects/index.epx], [http://www.sap.com/solutions/sapbusinessobjects/newsevents/index.epx], [http://www.sap.com/community/flash/BusinessIntelligenceAGuideforMidsizeCompanies.pdf]
    I hope this help you.
    Best regards.

  • Best approach -To create RTF template having more than 50 tables.

    Hi All,
    Need your help.I am new to BI publisher. Currently we are using BIP 11g.
    I want to develop.rtf template having lots of layout and images.
    Data is coming from different tables (example : pulling from around 40 tables). When i tried to pull data from 5 tables by joining tables. It takes more time using data model in BI publisher 11g saved in xml and used in word doc.
    Could you please suggest best approach  weather i need to develop .rtf template via data model or query to generate a report.
    Also please suggest / guide me .
    Regards & Thanks in advance.

    it's very specific requirements
    first of all it's relate to logic behind
    as example 50 tables are related ? or 50 independent tables ? or may be 5 related and another independent ?
    based on relation of tables you create sql statement(s)
    how many sql statement(s) you'll have lead to identify ways to get data, as example, by package or trigger etc
    kim size of resulting select statement(s)
    if size say 1mb it's must be fast to get report but for 1000mb it can consume many time
    also kim what time it's not only to select data but to merge data and template
    looks like experimenting and knowing full logic of report is only ways to get needed output in projection of data and time

  • Best approach to add Z custom field to IC Agent Inbox search and results view

    Hi Experts,
    We are having a requirement to add a Z custom field to IC Agent Inbox search and results view. I got multiple forums and ideas, but looking for the best approach for handling this. I am sure, you experts, would have already done this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Siva

    Hi Sivakumar,
    AET is the best way by far to create a custom field in this area. It is easy and simple.
    Also, field once added in one business object it can be used at different objects as well.
    There is also a demo available for AET on sdn.
    Please let me know if any more help is required.
    Thanks,
    Bhushan

  • Best approach for RFC call from Adapter module

    What is the best approach for making a RFC call from a <b>reciever</b> file adapter module?
    1. JCo
    2. Is it possible to make use of MappingLookupAPI classes to achieve this or those run in the mapping runtime environment only?
    3. Any other way?
    Has anybody ever tried this? Any pointers????
    Regards,
    Amol

    Hi ,
    The JCo lookup is internally the same as the Jco call. the only difference being you are not hardcoding the system related data in the code. So its easier to maintain during transportation.
    Also the JCO lookup code is more readable.
    Regards
    Vijaya

  • Best approach with jsp

    hi,
    i have a scenario that's sending data from jsp.
    i have two options, soap and client java proxy.
    what is best approach for this?,  becasue jsp is calling java which contains coding to call webservice,  so this is similar with client java proxy.
    if you are me,  what is the best?  soap or cleint java proxy?  eventually, soap also proxy.
    please guide me what is big point?  i do not want to get you with basically different point that i know that client java proxy is ejb. soap is wsdl...
    thanks & regards;
    ogawa
    null

    Hi,
    As you already have a J2EE application ( a JSP ), i would suggest that you use Java Proxies for the same to integrate with XI. Proxies allow you to have a better perfromance and so, I would suggest to go with Java Proxies.
    For Java proxies this how to guide would help,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7d4db211-0d01-0010-1e8e-9b07fc2113ab
    Regards
    Bhavesh

  • Best approach for sending SMS through workflow

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario where in I have to send SMS as a part of an escalation workflow process.I wanted to ask to the forum as to what is the best approach to send sms from workflow.The information regarding the users and the numbers is to come from a table.So how do I integrating the workflow with the SMS.
    I am stuck with this problem and need urgent help with this..Any help would be sincerely appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Narsingh

    Hi Narsingh Panigrahi,
    Have you checked this function module as i suggested previously.
    Function Module--TELEPHONE_FROM_TO
    Since configuration is not done in our system i cant test this function module
    In this function module they have used this table TSP01
    The fields are
    RQTELELAN--country
    RQTELENUMTelecommunications partnerfrom
    RQTELENUMETelecommunications partnerto
    Function Module--TELEPHONE_FROM_TO
    In this function module they have used this table TSP01
    The fields are
    RQTELELAN--country
    RQTELENUMTelecommunications partnerfrom
    RQTELENUMETelecommunications partnerto
    When you are entering the telephone number you have give prefix country code ( for US it is 011) and at the end of the number you have to give the to country code that is ( for IN it is 91).
    Try this and let me know.
    Regards,
    Balaji E.

  • Best approach for handling a Repair business

    Hi All,
    A company provides Repair Services for various branded Products. The manufacturers send their Products for repair along with replacement Parts. The repaired Products are despatched back to the Original Manufacturer with details of Repair (nature of repair, Parts consumed etc.,). The Products are serialized and hence repair details has to be provided for each Unit of the Product.
    After repair, Labour and / or Material Charges (billing) are claimed with the Manufacturer (the company may also use some of their own Parts for repair). Actual cost incurred for Repair is also to be determined.
    Following metrics are to be taken care of:
    Technician’s Performance in terms of no of units repaired per day, % Yield (Out of 100 Units, recovery is 80) Technician wise, Cost of Repair – Actual cost incurred for Repair / No of Units repaired
    What would be the best approach to handle the above scenario in SAP R/3 v 4.7 ?
    Request feedback.
    Thanks.
    Raj

    Hi Raj,
               the steps for reparis process is as follows
    1.Repair order process
    2.Technical check and reparis processing
    3.outbound delivery and billing
    Repair order process
    1.create the sales order type RAS-repari/service and include the service product and serviceable material over there and save the order
    2. open the sales order in change mode go to menu sales document and deliver change the delivery type to LR i.e return delivery
    3. assign serial number for the serviceable materials
    the path is go to extras-->serial numbers assign and save
    4. go to VL02N and post the goods reciept that means we are taking the goods in to our stores. Then check IQ03 thr which we can display serial number master record and verify.
    Technical check and reparis processing
    1. open sales order in change mode and here we will recognize how the returns were posted
    go to item view-->repair tab in recieved field you can observe the recieved items
    2. below that Business decision: start repair
    you will get the repari procedure these things we can set it in customization.
    the path is sales and distributionsalessales documentscustomer services-returns and repari procedure--define repair procedure
    we have to assign repair procedure to item category
    so that whenever you will put the material through item category we will get our own repair procedure.
    then in the business decision
    we can select how many u want to repair and how many u want to do outbound and how many u want to scrap for scrap items uhave to issue credit memo after this save the sales order
    open sales order in change mode go to editdisplay criteria-all items
    double click on the item sothat you can see the smorder i.e. service order (which gets generated automatically) which we will assign in requirement class.
    Then go to service order confirm the operations and techo the order
    then last step is
    outbound delivery and billing
    we have to send the repaired device back
    go to va02
    and see as soon as we techo the order an outbound delivery is created in repari tab. Perfrom outbound delivery i.e. salesdocument--deliver(need ot remove default delivery type) and save.
    create transfer order and goods issue is posted.
    then go to DP90
    billing request process individually
    give your sales document number
    press save billing request
    then go to sales document billing
    invoice will get generated save it
    settle the service order to sales order thr kO88 and settle the repair order thr VA88
    still if you have any doubts mail me and reward me with points if it is useful to you
    Regards
    Satish

  • Best approach for multi-team/multi-projects.

    Hi,
    I'm looking for the best approach to handle multi-teams/multi-projects scenario. We have 20 development groups and over 300 products. Each products on it's own Schedule.
    Product X can be assign to Group A, but at some point, it can be assign to Group B.
    We are currently using TFS 2012, but will be upgrading to 2013 soon.
    Based on many reading, we are thinking to create only one Team Projects to ease management.
    In it, we will create a team for each development group, but we will not create an associated area path with the name of the team.
    - Group A
    - Group B
    - Group C
    Than, we will create an Area for each product.
    - Product X
    - Product Y
    - Product Z
    and, we will create multi-level of iterations to match each Schedule.
    - Product X
       - Release 1
          - Sprint 1
          - Sprint 2
    - Product Y
        - Release 1
           -Sprint 1
        - Release 2
           -Sprint 1
    The main issue, we have with this approach is that we can't use the Backlog or the Task Board effectivelly, as there is no way to filter per areas and iterations.
    Reading "How do I change the underlying query for the task board (and backlog board) on TFS Preview", this doen't seam to be possible in TFS 2012.
    In TFS 2013, "The Agile Portfolio Management: Using TFS to support backlogs across multiple teams" was introduced. Will this help to solve the problem?
    We would create a management team for each development group.
    We would create an agile team with an associated area for each product.
    The only thing that I couldn't find in the documentation is how to re-assign an agile team to another management team. Is this possible?
    Also can each agile team have their specific itérations, if so will it roll up properly to the management team?
    Regards
    SYSOTI
    PS: Sorry couldn't post the links of the quoted text as I get the message: Body text cannot contain images or links until we are able to verify your account. ;-(

    Hi SYSOTI,
    Based on your description, seems the area path is not configured properly hence you can't use the Backlog or the Task Board effectivelly.
    From the
    Agile Portfolio Management: Using TFS to support backlogs across multiple teams, the area path is set as agile team which is a consist of team members but not a product name. For you scenario, you can set the area path name as your product name to
    identify the associate products for work items.  And the groups you mentioned for products in the team projects are sub-group of contributors.
    Seems there is no need to create a management team for each development group since management team might be in a higher level to view the progress for all of the work across the agile teams. Certianly, you can create multiple management teams, but the management
    teams will be able to view works for all agile teams. 
    If you have multiple teams and products, you can create a team project for each product if the products don't have much relationship. However, it's OK to manage the projects for multiple products in the same team project. And working within a single team
    project also have benifits, you ccan check this
    blog for more information.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Best approach-several infotypes requested to be extracted/modeled in SAP BI

    Hello Gurus!
    The business wants to pull the data from about 150 HR infotypes (including 9-series) into SAP BI. The requirement has been blessed and it is a go (maybe the total number might increase over 150 but not decrease)!! The main premise behind such a requirement is to be able to create ad-hoc reports from BI (relatively quickly) on these tables.
    Now, has anyone of you heard of such a requirement - if so, what is 'best practice' here? Do we just blindly keep modeling/creating 150 DSOs' in BI or is there a better way to do this? Can we atleast reduce the work load of creating models for all these infotypes, somehow? (maybe create views, etc.?)
    Any kind of response is appreciated. Thank you in advance. Points await sensible responses.
    Regards,
    Pranav.

    Personally, I'd say the best approach for this would be not to extract the Infotypes at all and use Crystal Reports to generate ad-hoc queries directly against the Infotypes in your R3/ECC environment. This would eliminate the need to extract and maintain all of that data in BW and unless you have SAP Business Objects Enterprise installed on top of SAP BW, "relatively quick" ad-hoc queries in BW is not what I would call a common theme (BEx Analyzer, which is what I'm assuming is your reporting UI solution for this, isn't exactly user-friendly).
    If you must bring all of these Infotypes in SAP BW, creating views of Infotype data may be your best bet. It would definitely reduce the number of repositories on your BW environment, thereby reducing your maintenance time and costs.

  • Best approach for transition to IFRS from US GAAP

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I have gone through some of SAP presentations and also 2 EcoHub sessions on IFRS.
    I understand the SAP's suggestion to use of Parallel ledger as best approach.
    Can any one clear below my queries?
    1.  Assuming current SAP system is in ECC 6.0 with classical ledger and we are trying to migrate to SAP GL.  It is suggested to migrate to SAP GL first (lets say by 2010) and plan for adopting IFRS as one of parallel ledger (Non Leading) as a separate project (lets say from 2012).  For the years 2012 & 2013 we will have reporting both in US GAAP & IFRS. Till here it is clear. I am not sure how we can drop reporting in US GAAP from 2014 when it is set as leader ledger while migrating to SAP GL.
    Is there a way to migrate the IFRS non leading ledger as Leading ledger by 2014 and deactivate 0L - US GAAP ledger from 2014?
    2. Although I understand the reporting in IFRS can happen prospectively from 2012 onwards, I am not sure how to build the open balances as of 2012. For E.g., how to get the current book values of Fixed Assets as per IFRS principles.
    3. Is it advisable to migrate to SAP GL with leading ledger as IFRS directly and marking one of non leading ledger for US GAAP reporting? And how to drop posting in US GAAP non leading ledger from 2014 onwards?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Som

    Duplicate post

Maybe you are looking for