Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.

Dear All,
How would i be able to get to know the evaluation path used by organisational structure to display the structure. What i found in tcode : ppome is that it is showing evaluation but not path name. I want to know the reference path name which it is using.
Thanks,
Raj

Hi
Check the Report:
RHINFAW0 - Infotype reporting.
Regards,
Sreeram

Similar Messages

Querry regarding Evaluation path in org management

Hi Experts,
I need to configure an evaluation path as follows.
1. A manager M1 belongs to org unit O1. He manages Org unit O2.
2. Org unit O2 reports to O1. similarly O3 also reports to O1.
3. Now I need to develop a evaluation path in which, M1 should have visibility to all employees from both O2 and O3 in his MSS..
I have tried out many combinations with A002 and B002 relationships. but it not working.
So could you help me to build this evaluation path.
Thanks
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
As per your existing relationships, 02 and 03 both reports to 01 org. unit..
M1 belongs to 01, and 02 Reports to 01.
So I think you should create a relationship like the following.
1) Either M1 has to manage 03 (A012)
or
2) 02 has to Reports to 01 (A002 b/w the org.units)
I think any one of the above relationships must exist..
Otherwise, M1 cannot view all the employees from 03 in MSS, Since He is no more related with Org. unit 03.

Evaluation path in Organizational Management

Hi everyone ,
Can anyone explain me what is the Evaluation path in Organizational Management?
Thanks in advance.

Hi.
Evaluation paths represents a chain of relationships between object types.
By specifying the several objects and relationships the evaluation path will analyse your organization structure and retrieve the several objects included on it.
You can maintain evaluation paths on img -> Personnel Management ->Organisation Management-> Basic Settings-> Maintain Evaluation Paths
Using SAP documentation to be more precise:
An evaluation path is an instruction to the system which determines which object types and relationship(s) are to be included in an evaluation of your organizational plan.
One or more relationships are then used as "Navigation paths" for evaluating structural information in your organizational plan (relating to the organizational or reporting structures) or matrix organization. The sequence of the relationships included in the evaluation path is decisive in how the results of the evaluation are displayed.
Example
Evaluation path "Staff assignments along organizational structure" (SBESX):
No. Object type A/B Relationship Priority Type rel. object Skip
010 O B 003         *             S
020 S A 008         *             P
030 O B 002         *             O
For more information on priorities, see also: Priority
First of all in this evaluation path, the positions assigned (S) to an organizational unit (O) are determined, then, the holder (P) assigned to each position is determined. As well as this, the next organizational unit down in the organizational structure is determined, the above procedure then takes place for this organizational unit. This procedure is repeated for all further subordinate organizational units.
In the "Skip" field, you specify that a particular relationship is to be included in the evaluation path, but that the last object type in this relationship is not to be displayed.
So, if the skip field were selected in the first line of the above example, this would mean that the organizational units and persons would be displayed, but not the positions that the persons occupy.
Activities
1. Check the evaluation paths in the SAP standard system.
2. Create your own evaluation paths. These must be alphanumeric and have a- maximum of eight digits. They must begin with the letter "Z".
Further notes
Each relationship is defined by its short name ("A002", for example) and the evaluation text as an evaluation path and can not, therefore, be changed. You can change the evaluation text but not the short name of other evaluation paths.
Create new evaluation paths, if you have defined new objects and want to carry out evaluations for them in conjunction with object types that already exist. You also need new evaluation paths if you are modifying existing evaluation paths, by selecting a "Skip" field, for example. Copy the evaluation path into the customer name space (beginning with "Y" or "Z") and enter an evaluation path.
Regards,
Pedro

Evaluation path - accessing of the direct employees by the manager.

Hello Experts,
I need to configure the evaluation path , using which the managers can access all the direct employees.
Can u all please help me with this.
It would be really helpful if u could suggest some documents to refer.
Your answers will definitely be awarded.
Thanks and Regards,
Pooja Dev

Hi...
you can creat the evalution path in IMG -> PM -> PA -> OM -> Basing setting -> evalution paths..
1. select the evaluation path and make the relationship between the objects..
2. test this in easy access under geneeral structures..
but if u want to assing that evaluation path to spcefic user, then u need to user structureal authorisation..
which is different from general authorisation management..
Best Regards
Samson

Evaluation path

Dear All,
What is the significance of evaluation path, how it affects in org structure.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
Without the Evaluation Path, you can't view the structure of the Organization. It determines the relationship chain exist between the objects. Evaluation path is mandatory for Structural authorization, you can restrict the object depth and also to whom you are providing authorization.
Good Luck
Om

Evaluation Paths and Reports relating om

Hi,
How can we create external object types in om.
How can we create the Evaluation Paths and what is relevance of table T7771 and T 777E.
what are the reports specific to Om .

External objects we just need to Assign
Ex-Cost Centre and Holder of the psotion
Cost Centre we assign
and hodler of the position will get when we hire an employe
regarding Evaluation path Check the tcode PPSC
and give the Evaluation path which u want to see by assigning the various paths between different objects
RHXEXI00 --> Existing Organizational Units
RHXSTR01--> Organizational Structure with Positions
RHXSTR02 --> Organizational Structure with Persons
RHXEXI02 --> Existing Jobs
RHXEXI03 --> Existing Positions
Check the reports u can go to SAP East Acess and OM reports to view std reprots
Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 18, 2009 1:22 PM

Evaluation Path in OM

Basic OM question -- what is the concept of Evaluation Path? Please help me with some information on the concept of Evaluation Path

Hi,
following links may give you some hints of use and maintain evaluation paths:
Using:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/c5/e4b2bb453d11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Maintaining:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/c5/e4b2c8453d11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Bernd

MRS own organisational structure?

We have the following problem:
We want to implement the MRS 700 with linkage to HR(HCM) for ressources. The MRS uses the organisational structure with planversion active, currently in standard. We are using it already for HR and don't want to have two structures in one planversion.
I heard that it should be possible to create a MRS specific structure with MRS elements. (Saw it in a presentation sheet from SAP). It was included in the PPOME or a transaction very similar to it.
The question is:
How can I activate it to create an independant organisational strucutre? Someone told me about a new objecttype. If I need it, how must it be set up?
Is there another way to divide the structures i.e. a different planversion? How can it be realised?
Thanks for any help with this issue!

Hi Sunitha,
Implementation starts from designing the Org structure. This is a part of the busienss process study. It resembles the org hirearchy and how you map it in SAP in a real scenario.
As far as FI is concerned, generally accepted org structure would be to first determine the company code. This co code is a legal entity wherein the accounting data is captured and consolidated for external reporting. As part of this there are various parameters that need to be customized.
Secondly, Controlling is purely for internal MIS. When you study the business process of a particular org, you need to identify the business areas for which the management would want reports to be generated for internal purposes. As a process you then determine the cost centers / profit centers / segments to map those areas in SAP.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
p.k

OM evaluation path showing chief position and subordinates

Hi experts, is there any standard OM evaluation path showing the reporting structure in Org chart like this?
                 OU
                   I
                Chief
          _____I_____
          I                 I
    Position         Position
if there is no standard evaluation path, do I need to create extra relationship like S A002 Chief to every position??
What else solution would you suggest??
Many thanks!!

Your drawing (and last message) indicates a relationship between O and "Chief" and between "Chief" and S (Position). As others have mentioned, this is not SAP standard - and to me it doesn't make sense either. The chief position (A12 relationship) and the regular positions (A003 relationship) all belong to the same org.units don't they?
For your need you would actually have to create your own "Chief" object type, make your own relations and your own evaluation paths. I would strongly advise against this. What is the business need for this requirement?
In PPOME you can move the manager (chief) position so it is the first position in the in the Org.Unit. This will give a better visual of the org.sturcture. Also, check the priority field in the relationship, and check the documentation for this.
Hope this is of some help.

Regarding role resolution using evaluation paths in workflow

hi all,
Could anybody guide me on the steps needed to configure role resolution using evaluation paths in workflow. IF u could provide me with a sample it would be great.
Thanks in advance,
steve

Hi Steve,
Why dont you check the Standard rule 168. I am sure, that will give you some idea of Agent Determination. I mean, please refer the SWX_GET_MANGER function module.
In this,you can see RH_STRUC_GET is the function module that determines the required Agent/related Org Object using the Evaluation path(see the parameter - ACT_WEGID), here they have used SAP_TAGT.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Raja Sekhar

Evaluation Path for Position to Position Reporting Structure

Hello Everyone,
We currently have a position to position reporting structure in place. WIth this being said, not every supervisor in our organization is the chief of a team. I am trying to create an evaluation path that will look at a position, then go up to get the positions report to position (but not go up any further), then go down to get the positions that report to the supervisor. This will allow us to start with a position, then return all the positions that the report to position has. In essence this will allow us to start with a position and get the team (though we don't have an org unit for the team). I am trying to do this for the Team Calendar in ESS.
Below is what I have. The problem is with the depth, if I enter a 2, then it is not getting the lateral positions, but if I enter a 3, then it goes up to another level and gets an additional supervisor (which I do not want).
S     A     002     Reports (line) to     2     S
S     B     002     Is line supervisor of     1     S
S     A     008     Holder     3     P
Has anyone developed and Evaluation Path that does this (gets a positions team without having an org unit) and can offer assistance?
Best Regards,
Scott

My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
S A 002 Reports (line) or
S B 002 Is line supervisor
but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
say you have four levels why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
      2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
      3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

Hi all,
I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
Thank you and best regards,
Anna

Hi Anna,
You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
Hope it helps!
Regards,
SR

Regarding Customized evaluation path in OM

Hi experts,
This is Prasanna. i have created customized relationship as "HAS TALENTED PARTICIPANT" and evaluation path as "AZTI".i have assined this relationship between two object types that are D(course type) and P(person). In PP01 transaction i tried to save the record using this relationship.but there i am getting one issue that is showing below
"ERROR WHILE ADDING".
my evaluation path and relation ship showed successfully in ALLOWED RELATIONSHIP option.please help me to rectify this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
M.L.Prasanna

Hi Prasanna,
Please check whether your custom relationship has been maintained for object type or not for which you need to maintain this relationship.
Path to check:- SPRO > PM > OM > Data model enhancement > Relationship maintenancee > Maintain relationship > Allowed relationship
Revert for further clarification.
Regards,
Purnima

PCH LDB issue using Evaluation path

Hello,
I have a custom program which uses PCH LDB and runs for positions. The program works fine when I input Position IDs.
When I run with org.unit + evaluation path (O-O-S), the program runs forever. When I checked in debug the program is creating duplicate entries in the output internal table.
As per my analysis, this issue is happening only for org.units having positions more than 600. After processing 599 positions, the standard program sets the INDEX to 0 and resume the processing from 1st position resulting in infinite loop.
Can anyone please help me out in this?
Thank you.
Praveen.

thanks for the reply.
I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

Evaluation paths in MSS

Hi
Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
Any thoughts would be helpful.
-JT

Hello Raj,
you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
- AUTHC: R
- INFTY: 0001
- PERSA: *
- PERSG: *
- PERSK: *
- SUBTY: *
- VDSK1: *
If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
- Planversion: 01 (most likely)
- Object Type: O
- Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
- Status Vector: 12
- Depth: 0
- Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
Thats it
regards
Markus

Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for