Regarding fringe calculation
Hi...
What is fringe calculation...?? In my company we are using zt.code for that... "ZFGT0024"... When I execute this T.code... It is asking "company code group"... "What is the meaning of company code group....... and when I used already existed groups... it is saying no data is available... How can we post transaction by using this company code group....
It's very urgent to me....
plz... kindly... solve my problem...
Hi,
Fringe Benefit is one type of taxation.
company code group is the Main Company Name....check with that group.
normally Fringe Benefit will be applicable in the Company Level..
try to do...i will check for more information
Edited by: divya p on Jul 15, 2008 4:42 PM
Similar Messages
-
Hi.. gurus.,
My client wants to execute fringe calculation report by using zt.code... zfgt0024., while I'm executing this... System is asking "COMPANY CODE GROUP", period and fiscal year...
In my client there are some already created COMPANY CODE GROUPS are there., if I use any one of them,, sys displays "no data available",
How can post transactions for that..... and what is company code group...
plz..... kindly solve my problem......
thanks you..Hi,
Fringe Benefit is one type of taxation.
company code group is the Main Company Name....check with that group.
normally Fringe Benefit will be applicable in the Company Level..
try to do...i will check for more information
Edited by: divya p on Jul 15, 2008 4:42 PM -
Regarding vat calculating wrongly in miro
hi,
Issue:Reg: Miro Tax Differences
Tax Codes showing the small differences while doing the MIRO transactions. In all
the three tax codes Vat and Cst shows correctly in the purchase order
levels whereas while doing the Miro transactions the VAT and CST will not
calculate correctly.
As per Bill As per System Calculations
Total Bill Basic Amount 72016 72016 Diff
ExciseR.off 7419 7419 7417.66
Vat @ 5% 3972 3982.49
Total Bill Value 83407 83417.49 10.49
see the vat @ 5% in system it is showing 10.40 rs more in miro. Tax code used is VM(input 10.30% cenvat+5% vat),Condition type used is JVRD, tax procedure used is taxinn
Po details
material Qty Amount
20 301 44548
30 101 16968
40 100 10500
If any details required please revert back
Regards
BadriHi,
check following path
in SPRO-Gene rel-Logistic-ax on goods Movement-India-BASIC SETTING-DETERMINATION OF EXCISE DUTY-CONDITION BASE EXCISE DETERMINATION-CLASSIFY CONDITION TYPE
here check your Vat and CSt condition type is there or not,it should be there .
Regards
Kailas ugale -
Need help regarding complex calculation using Max value and limiting data after Max date in MDX
I am working on a bit complex calculated measure in SSAS cube script mode.
Scenario /Data Set
Date
A
B
C
A+B
5/29/2014
Null
34
Null
34
6/30/2014
Null
23
45
68
7/15/2014
25
-25
Null
0
8/20/2014
-34
Null
Null
-34
9/30/2014
25
Null
60
25
10/15/2014
45
-45
Null
0
11/20/2014
7
8
Null
15
a) Need to capture latest non-null value of Column C based on date
with above example it should be 60 as of 9/30/2014
b) Need to capture column A+B for all dates.
c) Add values from column (A+B) only after latest date which is after 9/30/2014.
with above example it's last 2 rows and sum is 15
d) Finally add value from step a and step c. which means the calc measure value should be = 75
I need to perform all this logic in MDX. I was able to successfully get step a and b in separate calc measure, however i am not sure how to limit the scope based on certain date criteria. In this case it's, date> Max date(9/30/2014) . Also how should
i add calculated members and regular members?
I was able to get max value of C based on date and max date to limit the scope.
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[LatestC] AS
TAIL(
NONEMPTY(
[Date].[Date].CHILDREN*[Measures].[C]),1).ITEM(0) ,visible=1;
CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[MaxDateofC] AS
TAIL(
NONEMPTY(
[Date].[Date].CHILDREN,[Measures].[C]),1).ITEM(0).MemberValue ,visible=1;
Please help with Scope statement to limit the aggregation of A+B for dates > MaxDateofC? Also further how to add this aggregation value to LatestC calc measure?
Thank YouHi Peddi,
I gave TRUNC to both of the dates. But still the same issue. I think the problem is in returning the BolbDomain.
return blobDomain;
} catch (XDOException xdoe) {
System.out.println("Exception in XDO :");
throw new OAException("Exception in XDO : "+xdoe.getMessage());
catch (SQLException sqle) {
System.out.println("Exception in SQL :");
throw new OAException("SQL Exception : "+sqle.getMessage());
catch (OAException e) {
System.out.println("Exception in OA :");
throw new OAException("Unexpected Error :: " +e.getMessage());
Thanks and Regards,
Myvizhi -
Error when creating GL accounts regarding interest calculation
Dear colleagues
When I create a GL account the system comes up with the sequent error message Field "Date of last interest run" contains an entry, although it is hidden. It is strange cause we are not using this functionality and as the message says we have this field hidden int the account group. We have installed the baseline package and i was wondering if there is any customizing point where the interest calculation functionality is activated or decativated (like global company code parameters). Your help will be appreciated,
Kind regards
MarcHi
The same is maintained in GL master.Pls unhide the field and check the entries in the master
Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
Regarding depreciation calculation
Hi experts,
1. Can i assign two depreciation methods for one asset, is it possible.
For ex : Machinery for first 6 months can assign SLM 5%
for next 6 months can assign WLM 2%
2. if i want to maintain Multiple percentages for one asset in year, then what are steps need to be follow.
Thanks & regards
vinod.Create/change the required depreciation key in AFAMA and assign it to your asset.
Check below link on calculation methods for Dep Key.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/4f/71dd6b448011d189f00000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards,
GK -
Isseu regarding MRP calculation.
Hi Gurus,
We have MTS scenario with strategy 10 ,requirement type LSF , in MD61 PIR are present from 01 /01/2011 till today , but when i check in MD04 only requirments from 01/04/2011 are taken into consideration ( for LSF requirment after 01/04 system is showing -ve qty and plan order are generated for these independent requirement ) , i want to know why PIR from 01/04/2011 are taken into account and why older PIR are not considered.
Current stock is 0 and planning time fence in 30 days and planning horizon is 100 days,, please help me understand why older demands are not taken for calculations.
Thank you,Hi.
I assume you have run the MRP with the processing key NETPL (Net Change in Planning Horizon). And as you have define planning horizon 100 Days that's why system is taking the requirement for only 100 days. If you want to have total requirement have to consider use MRP processing key NETCH (Net Change in Total Horizon).
Regards
Vivek -
Regarding Percentile Calculation
hi Experts,
plz help me is there any function module for calculating percentile or tell me formula for percentile calculationI would not rely on XI built in arithmetic functions as they are extremely inaccurate. Write your own UDF and use Java classes such as double or BigDecimal depending on use.
Yoni -
Hai regarding excise calculation h cess
hai this is swamy ragariding excise system not caluating the higher education cess 1 % not diplay in j1iin screen what is the in puts plz give the details . and we are mainatine condtion record and all from sd side it is calcluating in pricing also but it is not diaplay in j1iin screen plz give the answer man thanks
Hi,
Did u activate the AT1 indicator for your excise registration.
Regards,
Murali -
Hi Experts,
My problem is i have a start date and either the no of weeks or no of months will be entered dynamically based on this value i.e take for eg. 10 months is entered then i have to calculate the stock for 10 months
and display
1st month 2nd Month 3rd month...
stock au ..... stock quan... stock............
can you help me out .... please its very urgent kindly help
if possible give me a sample program....
Message was edited by:
MADHANGI SAMRAJFind the difference between two days in days, months and years
* Type in two date and find the difference between the two dates in
* days, months and years.
REPORT ZDATEDIFF.
DATA: EDAYS LIKE VTBBEWE-ATAGE,
EMONTHS LIKE VTBBEWE-ATAGE,
EYEARS LIKE VTBBEWE-ATAGE.
PARAMETERS: FROMDATE LIKE VTBBEWE-DBERVON,
TODATE LIKE VTBBEWE-DBERBIS DEFAULT SY-DATUM.
call function 'FIMA_DAYS_AND_MONTHS_AND_YEARS'
exporting
i_date_from = FROMDATE
i_date_to = TODATE
* I_FLG_SEPARATE = ' '
IMPORTING
E_DAYS = EDAYS
E_MONTHS = EMONTHS
E_YEARS = EYEARS.
WRITE:/ 'Difference in Days ', EDAYS.
WRITE:/ 'Difference in Months ', EMONTHS.
WRITE:/ 'Difference in Years ', EYEARS.
INITIALIZATION.
FROMDATE = SY-DATUM - 60.
reward points if it is usefull ...
Girish -
Hi,
Our Environment is Essbase 11.1.2.2 and working on Essbase EAS and Shared Services components.One of our user tried to run the Cal Script of one Application and faced this error.
Dynamic Calc processor cannot lock more than [100] ESM blocks during the calculation, please increase CalcLockBlock setting and then retry(a small data cache setting could also cause this problem, please check the data cache size setting).
I have done some Google and found that we need to add something in Essbase.cfg file like below.
1012704 Dynamic Calc processor cannot lock more than number ESM blocks during the calculation, please increase CalcLockBlock setting and then retry (a small data cache setting could also cause this problem, please check the data cache size setting).
Possible Problems
Analytic Services could not lock enough blocks to perform the calculation.
Possible Solutions
Increase the number of blocks that Analytic Services can allocate for a calculation:
Set the maximum number of blocks that Analytic Services can allocate to at least 500.
If you do not have an $ARBORPATH/bin/essbase.cfg file on the server computer, create one using a text editor.
In the essbase.cfg file on the server computer, set CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH to 500.
Stop and restart Analytic Server.
Add the SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH command to the beginning of the calculation script.
Set the data cache large enough to hold all the blocks specified in the CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH setting.
Determine the block size.
Set the data catche size.
Actually in our Server Config file(essbase.cfg) we dont have below data added.
CalcLockBlockHigh 2000
CalcLockBlockDefault 200
CalcLockBlocklow 50
So my doubt is if we edit the Essbase.cfg file and add the above settings and restart the services will it work? and if so why should we change the Server config file if the problem is with one application Cal Script. Please guide me how to proceed.
Regards,
NaveenYour calculation needs to hold more blocks in memory than your current set up allows.
From the docs (quoting so I don't have to write it, not to be a smarta***:
CALCLOCKBLOCK specifies the number of blocks that can be fixed at each level of the SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH | DEFAULT | LOW calculation script command.
When a block is calculated, Essbase fixes (gets addressability to) the block along with the blocks containing its children. Essbase calculates the block and then releases it along with the blocks containing its children. By default, Essbase allows up to 100 blocks to be fixed concurrently when calculating a block. This is sufficient for most database calculations. However, you may want to set a number higher than 100 if you are consolidating very large numbers of children in a formula calculation. This ensures that Essbase can fix all the required blocks when calculating a data block and that performance will not be impaired.
Example
If the essbase.cfg file contains the following settings:
CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH 500 CALCLOCKBLOCKDEFAULT 200 CALCLOCKBLOCKLOW 50
then you can use the following SET LOCKBLOCK setting commands in a calculation script:
SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH;
means that Essbase can fix up to 500 data blocks when calculating one block.
Support doc is saying to change your config file so those settings can be made available for any calc script to use.
On a side note, if this was working previously and now isn't then it is worth investigating if this is simply due to standard growth or a recent change that has made an unexpected significant impact. -
In MIRO excise not getting calculated
Dear Users,
I have an issue regarding tax calculation in MIRO,I have maintained tax code in PO and in analysis all the conditions are showing exact value as maintained. But in MIRO these excise duty's are not getting calculated, even i checked all the master data like J1ID and also the tax conditions, please provide your suggestions.
ThanksHi,
Check if EXYEAR is same as what is updated in J_1IEXCDTL table.
If not then that is the reason why excise values are not updated in J_1IGRXREF table.
Now the table should be updated with excise values only then the same will flow in MIRO.
Regards,
Brinda -
MIRO: Changes in tax calculation
Dear Experts,
My requirement is regarding tax calculations (Basic Excise Duty, Edu. cess, Higher Edu. Cess) in MIRO transaction. We calculate all these duties in this transaction with a taxed code which is based on fixed percentages for combination of tax code and condition record. We manually capture and post all these duties in J1IEX transaction based on the given percentages like 12% , 2%, 1%. The requirement is like, in some cases the user will have to capture and post duties in J1IEX transaction not based on the fixed percentages 12%,2%,1%. These duties could be any figures as provided by the dealer/supplier. As these duties are not based on the fixed percentages, we cannot define a combination of tax code and condition record to be used in MIRO transaction. In this case, the tax/duty calculated in MIRO transaction should get matched with figures already posted in J1IEX transaction. Is there any configuration which could do so.
Someone please shade light on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Aniruddha MahalleDear Anirudha,
If the user has entered the excise values manually means ZERO tax code is used in PO, then while entering the details in J1IEX the user has to check the MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab. When the MRP indicator is ticked in J1IEX then when the user enters MIRO on checking the calculate tax code and using the zero tax code(Tax code which is used in PO) the tax values are automatically calculated.
Many threads are already available in SCN.
Role of MRP Indicator regarding Excise Part in GR or in J1IEX
Excise Duty Pass on Scenario
Regards,
Bhanu -
Doubt Regarding Statistics Collection in 10g
Hello,
Me Jr Dba i have a doubt regarding statistics calculation in 10g.As we know that if we set
the initilization parameter STATISTICS_LEVEL=Typical then AOS(Automatic Optimizer staistics) calculate the statistics for the tables, whose blocks are greater then 10% changed from the last calculation.Here my doubt is since already statistics are gathered,
is there any necessity for us to gather the statistics manually by using
DBMS_STATS.GATHER to see the tables or system statistics.
Can u plz assist me on the above
Regards,
VamsiHi,
Please see here,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/stats.htm#i41448
If the table/s are changing very frequently than its better to gather the stats manually.This would lead teh volatile table coming up into the stats job again and again.
For the system stats and data dictionary stats,they are not collected by default.So there is no choice but to gather them manually.
Aman.... -
Hi Friends
In One My client i have following problem regarding
excise calculation
Basically in import purchase.Excise calculation(Duty, Cess,ED cess) is done asper goverment rule.This Calculation is depends on Assesalbe value .
Actaul cost price for product is diffrent.
on cost price again vat calculation is done .
When sale of this item is done only excsie calculation is passe d to customer .and selling price is again deffrent.on selling price vat calcultion is done.
how do i handel this sceanerio in Business on how i link particular purchse to particular sale.
Pls help as early as possibleSachin,
The ED and others should be calculated on Assessable Value. But the Vat should be calculated on unit price.
I hope this is the scenario.
In A/R or AP document, there is a field called assessable value. you should activate this in thru form settings.
The Tax formula for ED should be like this: The Base Amount should be set as Assessable Value.
For Vat base amount you should give the formula as Qty*Price + ED Amount.
You can get these formulaes in SBO Demo Company itself. Hope u understood this.
If the Unit Price includes ED credit, You have to create a UDF for capturing the Base amount and link it to the tax formulae. The Unit Price filed should be assigned formatted search for Unit Price Less ED Amount.
Still if u r not understanding please mail me to [email protected]
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I flash a BIOS upgrade.
A have a MS-7360 P35 Neo motherboards. The BIOS is AMIBIOS A7360IMS V1.1 052107 Over time, I have had several minor faults, advising that they may be the result of some mismatch between BIOS and hardware. So, having done this with other machines earl
-
My MacBook pro mid 2012 doesn't seem to have a "save as" function, so I can't seem to save multiple page pdf's together after moving thumbnails into the sidebar. It only saves the first page. I do have a 2008 version of Microsoft Office installed to
-
Hi friends Im working on Standard SRM PO smartforms BBP_PO. Since standard form does not have fileds like PRODUCT CATEGORY , MATERIAL NUMBER , PRODUCT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION , MFG NAME , PART NUMBER , Ive to customize stand. Form. My question i
-
For selection parameter the default date should be of the previous month.
Hi all, In my selection-screen what i want is for the selection parameter "Selection period month" the default value to be the previous month. For example today is 24.09.2008 so the default value of this field has to be 200808 instead of 200809 toda
-
Userexit in MM02 transaction?
Hi, I want to modify the value of MVKE-PRODH ( Product hierarchy field present in Sales-org data 2 view). This userexit/BADI should get triggered on Save of MM02. Thanks & Regards, Navneeth K.