Regarding vat calculating wrongly in miro
hi,
Issue:Reg: Miro Tax Differences
Tax Codes showing the small differences while doing the MIRO transactions. In all
the three tax codes Vat and Cst shows correctly in the purchase order
levels whereas while doing the Miro transactions the VAT and CST will not
calculate correctly.
As per Bill As per System Calculations
Total Bill Basic Amount 72016 72016 Diff
ExciseR.off 7419 7419 7417.66
Vat @ 5% 3972 3982.49
Total Bill Value 83407 83417.49 10.49
see the vat @ 5% in system it is showing 10.40 rs more in miro. Tax code used is VM(input 10.30% cenvat+5% vat),Condition type used is JVRD, tax procedure used is taxinn
Po details
material Qty Amount
20 301 44548
30 101 16968
40 100 10500
If any details required please revert back
Regards
Badri
Hi,
check following path
in SPRO-Gene rel-Logistic-ax on goods Movement-India-BASIC SETTING-DETERMINATION OF EXCISE DUTY-CONDITION BASE EXCISE DETERMINATION-CLASSIFY CONDITION TYPE
here check your Vat and CSt condition type is there or not,it should be there .
Regards
Kailas ugale
Similar Messages
-
Asset po vat calculation problem in MIRO
Hi
when user create asset po ,do MIGO ( GRN is nonvaluvated) and then MIRO
while simulating miro,vat not flowing correctly as in po value its differnt from Po value
BUT,..
When i remove GR base tick from Po and do,MIGO and MIRO,its calculating correctly
why so,any solution ,
Regards
Kailas ugaleHi sir,
Check account assignment - 'A' settings 'GR non valuated' is not ticked ?
YES its ticked
Whether any excise calculations were involved before VAT
No excise
Regards
Kailas ugale -
Problem in VAT Calculation @ the time of MIRO
Dear All,
We are using the Tax Procedure TAXINN.
When we create a LIV document with ref to a PO using the transaction MIRO & when I check the calculate tax button, the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data is more than the amount which is displayed in the taxes tab.
For Ex:
Created a PO with the following details.
Total Qty in PO - 10
Base Price - 1000/qty.
BED - 14% - 1400.00
ECS - 2% - 28.00
VAT - 4% - (4% on 11428) - 457.12
So my total Tax = 1885.12 (Including Excise & VAT).
Now when I create a MIRO document the tax amount which gets calculated when I check the Calculate button is 1885.12 (Same as above) in the Taxes tab of MIRO.
But the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data tab is 1,942.24
Also when I simulated the MIRO entrys the VAT amount which was simulated was - 514.24 & not 457.12 as in PO.
Can anyone please advice on the reason for this mismatch in VAT calculation during the time of MIRO?
Is there any specific settings for VAT in TAXINN ??
Note :
The Excise & VAT are calculated correctly during the time of PO creation. Also I havent maintained any additional VAT condition types for my VAT in the tax procedure.
Awaiting helpful replies.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PMHi All,
Please note that when I removed the VAT condition type JVRD from the Classify condition types settings in IMG then the VAT amount which is calculated in the Basic data tab of MIRO is equal to the actual Tax amount as in PO (Excise + VAT ), but the amount which is displayed in the tax tab of MIRO is less.
Now if I maintain the Classify condition types settings in IMG for my VAT condtn type JVRD then the VAT amount which is calculated in basic data is more than both the PO as well as tax tab in MIRO.
Please note as you all have suggested I tried this after creating a new material & with the newly maintained condition records in FV11.
But still the issue persists..
If anyone have any idea. plz revert.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 9, 2008 10:23 AM -
VAT calculation is wrong!!
Hi,
Its concerned to Indian Excise.
<b>Scenario:</b>
1)Tax code contains only 4% VAT & other excise duty is added manually in PO conditions.
2)In PO, VAT Calculation is correct
3)During invoice verifiavtion with ref to PO,Assessable values are flowing to MIRO for all line items of PO.
<b>Error:</b> when appropriate tax code is selected (Only 4% VAT) for each line item in MIRO,VAT value which is being calculated is not exactly equals to 4% instead its diiferent for each line items like 4.19%,4.74%,4.09% and 4.37%.
Can you pls advise,what is reason for this small difference in VAT calculation.
RegdsHi,
I checked in detail,other things are correct.
But one more point is,infact there are 2 POs & 1 Invoice related to above issue.If I try to do MIRO for both POs together this Difference in VAT amount is reflecting as said before,If individual PO is considered for Invoice verification there is no such difference in VAT amount i can post the document.
Regds -
Excise Calculated on Freight MIRO
Dear Gurus,
I am having the issue when Excise duty is being calculated on Freight suggested in PO while doing MIRO, Altough it is not calculated in PO.
I am using the TAXINN Procedure.
Please suggest how to avoid excise calculation on delivery amt in PO at the time of MIRO.
Because most of the time service tax is involved on delivery amt.
PO
PO Value- 1000
BED- 140
ECS- 3
SECS- 1
SUBTOTAL- 1144
VAT- 46
SUBTOTAL- 1190
FREIGHT- 119
TOTAL- 1309
MIGO
STOCK- 1119+
GR/IR 1000-
Freight Clearing 119-
Excise Posted as per PO
MIRO POSTING-
1. Goods-
VENDOR- 1190-
GR/IR- 1000+
CENVAT CLEARING- 144+
VAT- 46+
2. MIRO Freight-
VENDOR- 141-
Freight Clearing 119+
CENVAT CLEARING- 17+
VAT 5+
When i am posting MIRO For Goods items + Planned Delivery Cost still the excise is being calculated on excise amt & the entries are same above........
Please suggest
Thanks
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:14 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 16, 2008 4:15 PM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Dec 17, 2008 7:12 AMhi,
use zero tax code at MIRO for freight clearing.
regards,
sujit -
Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong
dear guru
while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
my issue is like this
i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
ED is calculated 140
Ecess calculated 3
S&H calculated 1
i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
now i that part of the quantit i have returne
lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
for that i have to apply any note
pl tell me urgent
thanks
regards
jrpMy understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer. -
Incorrect VAT calculation when a PO is raised.
Hello All,
The value of VAT calculated after a PO is raised is wrong,in my country it is 5% but the system calculates slightly higher than 5%.This is perculiar for PO.Hi,
Please check the Tax Procedures assigned for your country.
Either it is condition based or formula based.
If condition based check with your MM consultant, if it is formula based check your tax code % rates in FTXP.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth. -
Scheduling Agreement JIT / Forecast calculating wrong
Hello experts,
I´m with a problem with JIT / Forecast.
The forecast are calculating wrong values. For example:
Cumulative quantity calculated: 584
JIT schedule:
DATE TIME Order Quantity Cml. released quantity Open Quantity
06.01.2012 00:00 32 32
10.01.2012 00:00 352 384
13.01.2012 00:00 128 512
17.01.2012 00:00 88 600 16
Forecast schedule
DATE TIME Order Quantity Cml. released quantity Open Quantity
20.01.2012 00:00 112 112
24.01.2012 00:00 224 336
27.01.2012 00:00 128 464
31.01.2012 00:00 200 664
The values of forecast are calculating by Cumulative quantity calculated that is 584 and I dont have any Open Quantity and in this case I need to have Open Quantity in Forecast.
The forecast must not be calculated by the amount in transit
Help me.
Tks
LFCHi ashish
Check the planning delivery schedule tab and go to item data -> delivery schedule header and check wheather any proper information has been filled or not
Regards
Srinath -
Error In Posting to accounts - PF calculated wrong
Hi,
I am getting error in Posting to accounts- error - Posting balance is not cleared (Period -
Following Wage types are calculated wrong -
Expense
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 =6,500.000
Balance sheet
MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000-
MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 = 325,000.000-
MF80 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 =6,500.000-
/3P2 Professional Tax Basis = 8,387.096-
Symbolic accounts assigned are as standard - no changes made
Please help me solve this.
Thanks in advance.
MonicaHi Monica,
We have solved this issue in our company.
For this you have to create another wage types & make a "PCR" as it divide the 100000 amount from the technical wage types, & then instead of posting the technical wage types post the new wage types u have created.
Don't worry about statutory reports as in there SAP is using some factor which will give the correct value.
Regards,
Gaurav -
Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double
Hi Gurus
1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
Please find the file attached
Please suggest me if I M wrong.
Thanks & Regards
SubrataHi.
In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
Itemization of Ck11N
Itemization of COR2
Please Help
Thanks & Regards
Subrata -
VAT calculation in Import pricing in Africa
Dear Experts,
I'm configuring a Import Pricing procedure for my African client where the Scenario is as mentioned.
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
How can this scenario be mapped? As in Import pricing, Tax code is Zero. And there is no Tax procedure defined in SAP for Africa. If I create a Tax code with 14%, it calculates Tax on the Base price & not on the Total of "Step 1 to 5" as per my requirement.
I have checked a similar scenario for VAT calculation in Import pricing in Thailand. Can it be used? if so with what changes or what are the steps involved to meet the above requirement.
Kindly reply, if any one has worked earlier on this scenario.
Regards
Chitra
Edited by: Chitra H P on Jul 29, 2010 3:22 PMHi Chitra
You are aware I take it that Africa is continent and not a country?
You won't find anything in SAP for "Africa" in the same way that you won't find anything for Asia.
James -
VAT calculation in Import pricing in Tanzania
Dear Experts,
I'm configuring a Import Pricing procedure for my African client(Country - Tanzania) where the Scenario is as mentioned.
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
How can this scenario be mapped? As in Import pricing, Tax code is Zero. And there is no Tax procedure defined in SAP for Africa. If I create a Tax code with 14%, it calculates Tax on the Base price & not on the Total of "Step 1 to 5" as per my requirement.
I have checked a similar scenario for VAT calculation in Import pricing in Thailand. Can it be used? if so with what changes or what are the steps involved to meet the above requirement.
Kindly reply, if any one has worked earlier on this scenario.
Regards
ChitraHi
1.Cost(Base Price) = 100
2.Insurance = 10
3.Freight =10
4.Customs duty = 10
5. IDF Value = 10
6. Vat = 14% on (12345 i.e on 140)
As per the above this can be done in Tax procedure of Africa check the conditions type which you are using in TAX Procedure for all these condition type and go to the subtotal column and enter key 4 then the value of these conditions maintained there will added to BASB condition type inTax procedure which is nothing but gross and the you can have your VAT conditio type if you are using TAX INN procedure then maintain the vat % condition in FV11 or if you are using TAXINJ procedure then you ca create tax code in FTXP & IN that tax code you add VAT conditio as per your requirement. Hope this can helps you.
Regards -
Delivery date getting calculated wrongly in delivery created via VL10D
Hi Gurus,
We have a strange issue, where in delivery date is getting calculated wrongly for replenishment delivery created via VL10D.
When we are creating via VL10D , delivery date is getting the additional 30 days from MaxDlvCrteDate . With initial investigation i see that VL10D has delivery creation profile 0101 for which no of days maintained in max delv creation date is 30 .
I assume that the delivery date is getting the additional days from delivery creation profile felid no of max delv creation date .
I have created the delivery on 24.03.2011, as per the route no of TL time is 9 days , So Ideally the delivery date should be 04.04.2011 , however system has calculated it as 23.04.2011
Delivery no No of days in MaxDlvCrteDate Delivery date
213443158 30 23.04.2011
If I create the delivery for the same PO using t-code VL10B, then delivery date is calculating correctly.
Not sure why system behavior is strange.
Please help me with your inputs to resolve the issue..
Thanks in advancePlease request one Abaper to solve this problem.
You cannot due nothing as the problem is in Code.
Regards
William -
Problem in VAT Round off during MIRO
Hi Friends,
I having problem in VAT round off during MIRO. We have created PO with excise +VAT. VAT amount has been rounded off. After GRN, we are trying to post the Invoice in MIRO, the VAT amount shows with Decimal.
We are using TAXINN, in the tax pricing proceedure i have mede 17 for call type for VAT condition type. in OB90 we have mede the rounding rule as 100 for currency INR.
When i create the FI direct invoice using the same Tax code it works fine, but having problem in MIRO. I want the decimal should be rounded to the nearest value.
Can any one help me is there any standard set up where we can arrive this?? OR is it required any user exit??
Regards,
DevaCheck whether you can use the user exit function module KR_USER_EXIT_ROUNDOFF
Regards,
SDNer -
Re: VAT Calculation in UK Localization
Last month I requested help on VAT calculation in UK Localization; for which I received a helpful explanation from Rajiv Agarwalla. Here is the link...
VAT Calculation in UK Localization
Now I require a SDK help on this...
I am creating a Purchase Order through Document object; which gets successfully posted in SAP Business One. But calculated VAT doesnu2019t include terms discount. Somehow it is not referring the cash discount attached with the Payment Terms.
When I opened the created Purchase Order in SAP Business One; and reassign the same Payment Terms then it considers the discount and appropriately calculate the VAT.
Here is the sample code snipu2026
''' <summary>
''' This Proc Adds the Purchase Order in the SAP B1 Application
''' </summary>
''' <remarks></remarks>
Public Sub m_AddDoc()
Dim lobj_Documents As SAPbobsCOM.Documents
Dim lobj_oSbo As SAPbobsCOM.SBObob
Dim lobj_oRecSet As SAPbobsCOM.Recordset
Dim lint_ErrorCode As Integer = 0
Dim lstr_Err As String = ""
Dim lint_ReturnCode As Integer = 0
Dim lstr_ObjKey As String = ""
Try
'Instantiate the Document Object as Purchase Orders
lobj_Documents = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders)
'Instantiate the SBo object
lobj_oSbo = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.BoBridge)
'Instantiate the Recordset Object
lobj_oRecSet = B1Connections.diCompany.GetBusinessObject(BoObjectTypes.BoRecordset)
'Set the Header Information for the Purchase Order
'Set the Card Code for Vendor
lobj_Documents.CardCode = "V10000"
'Set the Confirmation as Yes
lobj_Documents.Confirmed = BoYesNoEnum.tYES
'Set the Type of Document As Item
lobj_Documents.DocType = BoDocumentTypes.dDocument_Items
'Set the DocDate
lobj_oRecSet = lobj_oSbo.GetDueDate("V10000", Today.Date)
'Set the DocDate
lobj_Documents.DocDate = Today.Date
'Set the Document Due Date depending on the Payment Terms set
lobj_Documents.DocDueDate = lobj_oRecSet.Fields.Item(0).Value
'Set the Payment Terms as 2P10Net30 Cash Discount for this is 2%
lobj_Documents.PaymentGroupCode = 3
'Set the Payment Method As Outgoing BT
lobj_Documents.PaymentMethod = "Outgoing BT"
'Set the Lines Details for a single Line
'Set the Item Code
lobj_Documents.Lines.ItemCode = "A00001"
'Set the Unit Price
lobj_Documents.Lines.UnitPrice = 500
'Set the Line Item Qty
lobj_Documents.Lines.Quantity = 1
'Set the Vat Group as I1 (Input Tax) where Tax Percent is 17.5 %
lobj_Documents.Lines.VatGroup = "I1"
'Get the Return Code after adding the Document
lint_ReturnCode = lobj_Documents.Add
If lint_ReturnCode = 0 Then
MsgBox("Purchase Order added successfully")
Else
'Get the Last Error Code
B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastError(lint_ErrorCode, lstr_Err.ToString)
'Display the Error
MsgBox(B1Connections.diCompany.GetLastErrorDescription, MsgBoxStyle.OkCancel)
End If
Catch ex As Exception
'Display the exception
MsgBox(ex.Message.ToString, MsgBoxStyle.OkCancel)
Finally
Gc.collect()
End Try
End Sub
After the Purchase Order gets added I get the following results:-
Line Level Amounts :-
Unit Price :- 500 GBP
Line Discount % :- 0.00
Price After Discount :- 500 GBP
Vat Group :- I1
Gross Price :- 587.50 GBP
Total Lc :- 500 GBP
Tax Amount LC :- 87.50 GBP
Gross Total Lc :- 587.50 GBP
Header Level Amounts :-
Total Bef.Discount :- 500 GBP.
Header Discount :- 0.00 %
Tax :- 87.50 GBP
Total Payment Due :- 587.50 %
But the expected result has to be as follows :-
Unit Price = 500 GBP
Cash Discount Percent :- 2 %
500 - 500*2 % = 490
490 * 17.5 % = 85.75 GBP
So the Tax Amount at the Line level should be 85.75 GBP instead of 87.50 GBP
I would appreciate if someone could review my code and rectify the problem.
Regards,
Jennifer Smith.Still no luck
I was just investigating this and found that;
When I add Purchase Order through SAP Business One application it keeps the applicable terms discount in field u201CVatDscntPru201D table POR1.
But this field is not exposed through SDK Document Lines object. So I am not able to update this field and thatu2019s the reason my tax amount is incorrect.
I am worried about this and donu2019t know how can I calculate the tax appropriately. Can any one please help me out?
Regards,
Jennifer Smith.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem with FILE DELETE.
Hi, I am facing a wierd problem here, my requirement is to FTP the file to another server and then delete it from the directory if the FTP is successful. Here is my code. FTPClient ftp = new FTPClient(); ftp.connect("IP_ADDRESS_OF_FTP_SERVER"); ftp.l
-
We've got a 9.2.0.6 database on AIX 5.3. We need to get it to 11.2.0.2 on AIX 6.1 - I realise that there is an intermediate step to get to 11.2.0.2 I've been told that I only have to install the 9.2.0.8 binaries on the AIX 6.1 machine. That I could c
-
I am getting an Out of memory error?
when i try to convert excel file into database if file is too larg! in shows me exception out of memory How to remove that. my memory in 500MB Edited by: mnpw on Sep 25, 2008 7:28 AM
-
Shared Services - HTTP 403 error when trying to access from user's PC
We recently upgraded to Shared Services 9.3.1. We can get into the User Mgt Console when remoted into the Shared Services server; however, when I try to access the URL from my PC, I get an HTTP 403 error. I have confirmed in my Internet Options/Secur
-
Save editor settings in Forte for Java?
I am using Forte for Java, community edition v.3.0. I lost all the abbreviations setup(which was surprising) after a crash, and it is really painful to set all those up again. I just wonder is there any way to save the editor settings in an external