Regarding the Webutil function

I have downloaded the Webutil and on trying to run the demo i am getting the error WUC-015.. staing that bean is not found..So that I am not able to go forward from this...And Also I am Working in Forms 9i.... I have heard that Webutil works only from the Form10g..Is it true..Pls help..It is urgent

Please read the webutil FAQ for debugging this error. Strictly speaking it is not certified to work with 9i FOrms although it does in most cases.
Regards
Grant Ronald
Forms Product Management
http://www.groundside.com/blog/content/GrantRonald/

Similar Messages

Regarding the Remote Function Module

hi,
Can any body can provide the brief information regarding the Remote Function Module.
1)How to create the remote function module
2)how it differ from the normal function module
3)any special features about this.
Thanks in advance

Hi
RFC (Remote Function Call) is similar to the general SAP fun module: except that in the attributes you click the radio button: RFC enabled;
and you will be passing an Import parameter DESTINATION to it.
Other code and usage will be similar to any fun module;
Have a look at any fun module in SE37 to understand better about the different components of Fun modules;
Refer this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/22/042518488911d189490000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
check out the following link it might help you
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/de/data/pdf/BCFESDE2/BCFESDE2.pdf
Function Modules;
Check this matter.
Function Modules are Global ABAP programs created by SAP for reusable purpose.they have IMPORT,EXPORT and TABLE parameters, and EXCEPTIONS to through when error occurs.
You can create them from TCode SE37.
Go through the following doc:
Function modules are cross-program, reusable procedures that are organized into function groups, and whose functions are implemented between the statements FUNCTION and ENDFUNCTION. Function modules and their interfaces are created in the Function Builder.
Function Module Interfaces
The parameter interface of a function module is defined in the Function Builder. It includes the definition of interface parameters and the specification of exceptions that can be triggered by a function module. The Function Builder automatically generates comment lines below the FUNCTION statement in the source code of the function module, which represent the interface of the function module with the following syntax:
Syntax
... [IMPORTING parameters]
[EXPORTING parameters]
[CHANGING parameters]
[TABLES table_parameters]
[{RAISING|EXCEPTIONS} exc1 exc2 ...]
The syntax and semantics of IMPORTING, EXPORTING, CHANGING, RAISING, and EXCEPTIONS mainly correspond to the definition of method interfaces with [CLASS-]METHODS. The additional option of defining table parameters using TABLES is obsolete.
Interface parameters
The interface parameters are defined on the relevant tab pages in the Function Builder.
IMPORTING parameters are input parameters. When the function module is called, a suitable actual parameter must be specified for every non-optional input parameter. The content of the actual parameter is passed to the input parameter when the call is made. The content of an input parameter for which 'pass by reference' is defined cannot be changed in the function module.
EXPORTING parameters are output parameters. When the function module is called, a suitable actual parameter can be specified for every output parameter. The content of an output parameter that is defined for 'pass by value' is transferred to the actual parameter if the function module is completed without errors. An output parameter that is defined for pass by reference is not initialized when the function module is called.
CHANGING parameters are input and output parameters. When the function module is called, a suitable actual parameter must be specified for every non-optional input or output parameter. When the function module is called, the content of the actual parameter is passed to the input/output parameter, and when the function module is completed, the content of the input/output parameter is passed to the actual parameter.
TABLES parameters are table parameters. Table parameters are obsolete CHANGING parameters that are typed as standard tables with a header line. If an internal table without a header line or a table body is passed as an actual parameter to a formal parameter of this type, an empty local header line is generated in the function module. If an internal table with a header line is used as an actual parameter, both the table body and the header line are passed to the function module. Pass by value is not possible in formal parameters defined using TABLES. Formal parameters defined with TABLES can be replaced by formal parameters defined with CHANGING. A local work area can be created for the internal table in the function module by using the addition LIKE LINE OF itab of the DATA statement.
Exceptions
The exception of a function module are defined on the Exceptions tab page in the Function Builder. Here you can select exception classes to define whether class-based exceptions are declared or non-class-based exception are defined. Class-based exceptions are represented in the above syntax by RAISING, and non-class-based exceptions are represented by EXCEPTIONS.
The addition RAISING is used to declare class-based exceptions that can be propagated from the function module to the caller. Exceptions in the categories CX_STATIC_CHECK and CX_DYNAMIC_CHECK must be explicitly declared, otherwise a propagation can lead to an interface violation. A violation of the interface leads to the treatable exception CX_SY_NO_HANDLER. Exceptions of the category CX_NO_CHECK are implicitly always declared. The declaration of exceptions of the category CX_STATIC_CHECK is statically checked in the syntax check. For exceptions of the category CX_DYNAMIC_CHECK, the check is not performed until runtime. In a function module in which class-based exceptions are declared with the RAISING addition, the statement CATCH SYSTEM-EXCEPTIONS cannot be used. Instead, the relevant treatable exceptions should be handled in a TRY control structure.
The addition EXCEPTIONS is used to define a list of non-class-based exceptions that can be triggered in the function module using the statements RAISE or MESSAGE RAISING. Exceptions defined in this way - as with formal parameters - are bound to the function module and cannot be propagated. If an exception of this type is triggered in a function module, and no return value has been assigned to it with the homonymous addition EXCEPTIONS of the CALL FUNCTION statement when the call was made, this leads to a runtime error.
Note
For new developments after release 6.10, SAP recommends that you work with class-based exceptions that are independent of the function module.
RFC is a technology which is used to access a functions (Modules) from
the remote systems.
If a function module is set as remote enabled which can be access from
the remote system via RFC.Eg: U can access the Remote enabled function modules in ur VB,Webdynpro,Java,Visual composer program.
A function module can be set as remote enabled by SE37->Go to ur FM->click the option Button "remote enabled".
But Normal function modules can not accessd from the remote system.
Good Example for RFC enabled function module is : BAPI(Business Application Programming Interface)
Note: All BAPIs are Remote enabled but not all remote enabled function modules are BAPI.
CALLING A FUNCTION MODULE:
1)In U ABAP Editor --> Click "Patter" ---> Selection Option Button "Call Function"
--> Write the Corresponding FM name --> Hit Enter
2)The appropriate import ,export Parameters will be displayed in ur editor
3)Pass the Values Here.
Also check these links.
http://www.geocities.com/victorav15/sapr3/abapfun.html
Check this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/9f/db988735c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ef/d94b78ebf811d295b100a0c94260a5/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/41341147041806e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
Check this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/9f/db988735c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ef/d94b78ebf811d295b100a0c94260a5/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/41341147041806e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
See the following links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/db970e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/db970e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/db970e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/db970e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/9f/db970e35c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/26/64f623fa8911d386e70000e82011b8/content.htm
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

Regarding the obsolute function modules

Hi All,
below function module are obsolute in 4.6c ,what are the new function modules in ECC 6.0.
1.GRAPH_RECEIVE
2.GRAPH_SET_CUA_STATUS
already i search in sdn but i didnt get exact answer................
plz help me.....
Regards,
Madhu

Hi
Though these function modules are set to obsolete,they are still maintained and supported by SAP and can be used in your application further. They are set as obsolete in order to avoid the usage in new development projects. When starting new developments it is recommended to use class 'cl_gui_chart_engine' .
Hope this is helpful.

Regarding the basic function of the *_LEXERs

We are using Oracle Text to index XML documents that contain an "abstracts" group element. Each document can contain one or more abstracts written in a different language (primarily English, French and German). Thus a single document can contain multiple languages.
We are wondering if we need to use any of the various LEXER types to deal with the different languages. My understanding of the documentation is that MULTI_LEXER or WORLD_LEXER would not be appropriate, since they work on the document level. AUTO_LEXER documentation seems vague, however... would AUTO_LEXER be able to sense language changes within a document?
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/text.111/b28304/cdatadic.htm#i1007538
Or, perhaps I needn't be concerned at all, since English, French and German are all "whitespace deliimited languages"-- If the sole function of the lexer is to parse tokens, then is there really any difference between the English lexer and the French/German lexers?
Thanks.

Dear Nathand,
Thanks for your answer, I tried the change and you are right. That shows that this not a standard PID, since that means (and actually I can see it now by checking inside the vi) that it is not using the derivative of the error but the derivative of the process variable. I know that this is used sometimes to prevent the effect of fast changing set-points, but it is a shame that they do not comment on it in the help, and that this is not a selectable feature. Do you know if there is a way to edit these pre-packaged vi's?
One more question, about the labview style. I included the sequences just to group terms and make the code more readable to separate the integrator from the derivator and not have a knot of entangled signals. Specially when I run the clean-up diagram, it gets very entangled. I have been looking for another way to do that (container boxes, groups). It would be nice if you could suggest me something I can do for it.
Thanks again,
Pablo

Regarding the email function in Iphoto

When I email ordinary through mail, I add a attachment in the email, then it is shown inline and as a attachment.
But when I use the email function in iphoto it only inlines the picture, it doesnt add the file as regular attachment, is there anyway I can change that?

the reason why I need this so you understand me.
is that I use to blog from email.
if I email regular no problem at all with my attachment, but if I email through iphoto my blog doesnt recognize the picture in the email so it dont get added.

Regarding the RFC Function Module call from PI

Hi All,
I am working on one File to RFC interface, in which File adapter picks the file, this file data has to goto 2 function modules in SAP system. For this i added 2 Inbound interfaces in INTERFACE DETERMINATION and I developed 2 RECEIVER AGREEMENTS. In 2 RECEIVER AGREEMENTS i added single receiver RFC Communication Channel.
Now i want assurance that once 1 st function module will execute completely, then only my second function module should be called. Is there any setting that i can do to make this sync?????.
what is the use of Send 'Confirm Transaction' in receiver RFC Communication Channel under Adavanced Mode.
Thanks,
Balu

Hi,
As per you requirement I would suggest to change your scenario as File To Proxy. It will much more easier and 100% sure to process second BAPI only after first gets successful inside the proxy.
Pass the data from file adapter to inbound proxy and then inside proxy code you first call the first BAPI and use commit wrok. Once commit work is successful then you call the second BAPI otherwise rollback the changes.
Example:
Call First_BAPI
<pass the data to it's import export parameters>
Commit work.
if sy-subrc =0.
Call Second_BAPI.
<pass the data to it's import export parameters>
Commit work.
endif.
Note: If you are not very much comfortable with ABAP the discuss this with your ABAP team mate.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Regarding the GR functionality..

Hi,
I had a peculiar requirement, Can any once help me out how this functionality can be achived.
Requirement:
Both the User who had raised the shopping cart with the help of 'Shop on behalf' functionality & the User for whome the shopping cart was raised should be allowed to perform GR for this Shopping Cart in SRM system.
We are using SRM 5 (SRM Server 5.5) system.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Mahesh

Hi Mahesh,
You can very well do that.
In the root org maintain the attribute "Requisitioner" for both the users.
Suppose take the case of manager and purchaser. If the purchaser wants to shop on behalf of a manager, maintain manager's user ID in the Requisitioner attribute of purchaser and viceversa.
If you maintain only this, the purchaser can shop and create P.O on behalf of manager but not confirmation.
If you want the purchaser to create confirmation on behalf of manager maintain the user ID of the purchaser in the "Requisitioner" attribute of Manager.
Also while creating SC on behalf of manager, in the Basic Data tab change the Goods Recipient from Manager to Purchaser.
Now both the manager as well as purchaser can create confirmation (GR)
Note : While maintaining user ID in the Requisitioner attribute the user ID should be prefixed with US i.e if 1037085 is the user ID then you have to maintain US1037085 in the Requisitioner attribute.
Hope this will solve the problem.
Please feel free to ask in case any clarification is needed.
Award points for suitable answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Small help in SQl regarding the distinct function

could some one tell me how to get a distinct column rows from a table ..
select distinct(xyz), sales from dept
which is giving the duplicate rows for the column xyz...
could some one give me the right syntex for this
Thanks in advance ..

Thanks for this... But i am just wondering why distinct(xyz) is not giving the distinct values for the column xyz is there any change in the sql ...which i need to do

Regarding the radio function.

Anyone know if there is there a way to switch from fm to am?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

26-Sep-2008 09:24 AM
mccbleue wrote:
In many countries, AM radio is not used so often any more anyway.
Totally agree with you there.
I haven't need to use AM for at least 5 years now.
AM RIP

Form with webutil functions. How identify if user is using native internet

Hello,
I have one form with some webutil functions. How can i identify if a user is using the form with native internet explorer?
If a user with jinitiator use the forms, its ok, but when a user use native internet explorer, he gets error orcle.forms.webutil.fileTransfer bean not found. WEBUTIL_FILE_TRANSFER.getMaxTransfer will not work.
When the user use internet explorer native, I want disable the webutil function before generate a file on the application server and then download to a client machine.
Im using Forms10g and Forms10gR2.
Thanks

do you have two different config-sections for the two modes?
If so, you could either place a different value for each one in the otherparams-tag and read that at runtime, or use a different env-fiel and set some variable with different values for each config in there and read it via TOOL_ENV.

Regarding the usage of HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATIONS function module in ECM badi i

Hi All,
We have requirement where we need to update the infotype 0015 while implementing the badi 'HRECM00_ACTIVATION'.
To achieve this functionality we are calling the HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION function module to update the infotype 15. But we are getting the runtime error.
Can some one suggest how to solve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Sreelatha Gullapalli.

thanx for ur reply...
But i want to use Transmission Medium 5 only as i have the requirement to Send the data as an EMAIL or FAX depending on the Communication Method specified in the Partner Number.
Actually SAP Help also explains the usage of this medium using the same requirement as mine... but then it never anywhere specified on how the Print Program will be...
I also checked the standard output type CPAC used in Application V7 to which transmission medium 5 is assigned. And the print program assigned to this output type has no coding on sending the email using the FM. So i am very very confused.... I have seen few postings in this forum on this topic.. but not clear enuf to clarify my confusion...
Kind Regards,
Tanuja

Regarding the functional modules

hi,
there are three types of function modules are there.
1)normal functional modules
2)remote functional modules
3)update functional modules
what is the update functional modules?
please provide me the information regarding this functiional modules

Hi,
go through following ,material:
http://sapmaterial.com/RFCmaterial.html
http://sapmaterial.com/bapi.html
Reward points if helpful
Srikanta Gope

Error While including the Multisite functionality

Error While including the Multisite functionality & trying to click on SiteAdministraion tab in BCC
Background: We have migrated our application from ATG v9.1 to ATG v 10.0.2 and implementing Multisite on the same
Getting this error on BCC console:
12:55:36,893 INFO [ServerImpl] JBoss (Microcontainer) [5.0.0.GA (build: SVNTag=JBPAPP_5_0_0_GA date=200910202128)] Started in 2m:44s:727ms
12:57:24,234 ERROR [SiteAdminActivitySource] The acl for the custom workflow activity named siteadmin.manageSiteAssets is invalid. This activity will not be available.
atg.security.InvalidPersonaException: Profile$role$siteAdminUser
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.setPersona(AccessControlListParser.java:239)
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.parseAce(AccessControlListParser.java:277)
at atg.security.AccessControlListParser.parse(AccessControlListParser.java:193)
Thanks in Anticipation1

Hello Sudheer,
Increasing the Swap space is the only thing i noticed in all SAP Notes for your problem.
Configure more swapspace please and restart the installation.
Regards,
Siddhesh

How to use the Table Function defined in package in OWB?

Hi,
I defined a table function in a package. I am trying to use that in owb using Table function operator. But I came to know that, owb R1 supports only standalone table functions.
Is there any other way to use the table function defined in a package. As like we create synonyms for functions, is there any other way to do this.
I tryed to create synonyms, it is created. But it is showing compilation error. Finally I found that, we can't create synonyms for functions which are defined in packages.
Any one can explain it, how to resolve this problem.
Thank you,
Regards
Gowtham Sen.

Hi Marcos,
Thank you for reply.
OWB R1 supports stand alone table functions. Here what I mean is, the table fucntion which is not inculded in any package is a stand alone table function.
for example say sample_tbl_fn is a table function. It is defined as a function.It is a stand alone function. We call this fucntion as "samp_tbl_fn()";
For exampe say sample_pkg is a package. say a function is defined in a package.
then we call that function as sample_pkg.functionname(); This is not a stand alone function.
I hope you understand it.
owb supports stand alone functions.
Here I would like to know, is there any other way to use the functions which are defined in package. While I am trying to use those functions (which are defined in package -- giving the name as packagename.functionname) it is throwing an error "Invalid object name."
Here I would like know, is there any other way to use the table functions which are defined in a package.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gowtham Sen.

Open letter to Cisco regarding the UC320 platform

Cisco,
I have never in my life been exposed to a "production" piece of equipment with so many bugs, missing features and oddities as the UC320. While I am sure many of you are working hard to reign in the problems, this platform is an utter embarrassment that should be in the preliminary alpha stages, not a channel product being sold to end users.
It is clear that Cisco has little understanding of how SMALL business works and how SMALL partners work with small business customers. A larger partner may be able to string a larger business along with promises of bug fixes and feature additions while charging them to make things right and.or padding the overall cost to account for the callbacks. True small businesses don't have the time, patience or money to deal with problematic hardware. When a partner sells a small business a piece of technology, it better work (at a reasonable cost) or the technology and the partner are out the door.
I was extremely excited when this system was announced and saw great potential for small business customers and an alternative to the Avaya Partner IP and other platforms targeted at the same demographic. I jumped in and put a UC320 in the office of one of my small customers. This whole experience has cost me the trust of a client and is going to end up costing me $3000-$4000 out of pocket (hardware, labor, travel) to make things right with the customer.
As it stands, countless hours have been spent trying to get this system to operate in a reasonably stable and productive manner. At this time the UC320 system has been reset and reconfigured in KEY mode (this time using 2.1.3(0), as the problems with steering digits, call routing and redial in "hybrid mode" made the system more than a little cumbersome to use. Now in KEY mode, caller ID only works on some stations AFTER a call is picked up. On one station, incoming calls are somehow routed to the "Phone Monitor" buttons instead of the "Shared FXO Line" buttons. The user has to press the monitor button to pick up a call, but the call does not always ring at the station so she has to watch for the lights. While the caller ID functionality is a bit better after the latest firmware update, it is still far from working properly. These basic call routing problems are not reasonable and not acceptable, period. The customer is tired of "we are working on it" and so am I.
Other problems (to mention a few):
The GUI is full of buggy behavior. One example if many: The impendence matching dialog only works the first time around and then the GUI loses track of what it is doing and must be reset.
It takes 7-10 minutes for the GUI to load to the login screen over a remote connection. The UC320 is connected to a Verizon DSL, while not blazing fast it is a decent connection. Initial GUI loading on the LAN is almost as bad.
The IE9 product that ships with every new Windows computer is not compatible with the GUI. This is not reasonable.
The AA is somewhat unpredictable with regard to picking up calls and sometimes results in a busy tone and dropped call, even if the call is the ONLY call on the system. Sometimes the prompts are garbled and sometimes the AA does not even pick up.
Steering digit redial issue - still not addressed. Redial on hybrid mode is useless, as is the phonebook.
Caller ID only works part of the time, yet on every other system I have ever used, it works 100% of the time. This is not acceptable.
Answered calls on shared FXO lines show as MISSED on other stations with those lines. The workaround: remove the missed calls display feature. This is not acceptable.
Thus UC320 is not happy unless it is the only router, DHCP and DNS client on the LAN. The grayfield implementation appears to fail no matter what LAN topology and equipment are used. This device is far from friendly to the typical SBS or existing LAN with a dedicated DNS and/or DHCP server.
The handsets have a cheap feel to them compared to the Avaya and other competitors phones.
The sound quality of the ringtones is almost laughable if not sad
The speakerphone quality and overall voice quality are not as good as the competition's.
The filtering functionality of the logging feature does not appear to work properly
Firmware updates often result in a HANG condition where either the GUI needs reset, the system needs a physical reset and/or sometimes defaulted
Firewall port forwarding rule oddities where a rule is deleted from the gui but is still active in the firewall, yet the inability to easily use another data router to work around this problem.
The inability of the device to properly use the LAN port for INTERNET based functionality (Time for example) if the WAN port is NOT connected,
countless other 'issues" raised in the support forum and other venues...
These are ALL very basic functions that one would expect to be fixed BEFORE a basic telephone system platform is released for production. It is absolutely unreasonable for a CUSTOMER to have to put up with a system this buggy and it is absolutely unreasonable for a partner to have to devote this much time and money to getting system to work at even a very basic level of functionality.
To repeat the scenario: This config is as basic as it gets running 2.1.3(0) with (3) system phones, (3) users, (2) pots trunks and that's it. There are no odd call routing scenarios, no complex AA rules or schedules (in fact the AA is defaulted, including prompts). All (3) system phones have BOTH shared FXO lines (KEY MODE). Each and every firmware version has been tried and the system has been defaulted numerous times. The system fails to meet even the most basic expectations of myself or the end user and has become a sore spot between our company and a very good client.
I am somewhat baffled, if not outright bothered by the fact that this device is riddled with so many problems and the fixes are taking so long to be implemented, if at all. I have been asked (ordered) by the customer to get this "hunk of crap" out of their office and replace it with something that works "at no additional cost". I could not agree with the customer more...
A very unhappy Cisco Partner.
William Burnett

To William (and Cisco,)
Honestly, I like Cisco.
I like their "openess" (you can find documentation and help on almost anything anywhere), the contribution they make to industry by their huge R&D effort (more than all their competition combined....or so I've been told...), the accessibility and responsiveness of some of their key people in the distribution channel, and yes, I like the ecosystem in terms of support, tons of free education and sales support for both their SMB and classic enterprise solutions.
Having said that, I thank God for people like William Burnett, who I am sure opened the eyes of many partners about the things that are horrendously wrong with some of the products in the SMB portfolio, most notably the UC320. I think it is fair to say, that William has effectively "killed" it (the UC320) in it's present incarnation. That is, unless Cisco, decides to really rise to the challenge and fix a product that at first seemed ideal for the small enterprise, but which was poorly implemented in terms of QC and in some cases design.
We certainly are not going to be touching the UC320 with a 10ft pole now Nobody wants (or can afford to) get a bad name by selling "trouble" to your Mom&Pop shops or to people whose trust you worked hard to gain and who are really depending on you to deliver. Not in this economy....not ever.
Coming from a Nortel telephony background, its really hard to accept that having to respond to trouble calls or complaints continuously from customers when Nortel products worked so reliably. In fact, Nortel Norstar is so reliable as a key system that people joke , that's why they went out of business, they couldn't generate enough turnover in new sales on account of people holding on to their Norstar's forever.
As a seller/installer/user of Cisco voice (UC540) and CME there are a couple recommendations I would like to make to Cisco:
1)Private line emulation - inability to transfer or conference calls on a private line. (using the TRUNK XX command) on the CME/UC500 platforms needs to be significantly improved in order to keep up with the competition:
for one, when you select a private line and make a call you cannot transfer that call. Every other system I have worked with allows you to do this. This for me is a glaring "defect/design flaw". I spent a lot of time trying to get this "fixed" as I couldnt believe that Cisco would just omit such a basic function when all their competition has it. (You dont even think about this when dealing with other systems.) Its just expected.
2)Private line emulation - Inability to reflect the dialed number in the Call Detail Records for calls made via a "private line". If you select a private line on the UC500 or CME and make a call, the dialed number would not show up in the CDR. I have programmed systems from Nortel (Norstar, BCM,CS1000), Avaya - (IP Office 500, Partner Plus, and S8x00 Communication Servers) as well as various systems from Mitel and
Panasonic . The CDR packages for these systems are very well implemented and documented. Cisco's systems are well documented as well, but this is an area of the implementation where Cisco falls behind the competition. I am sure this can be fixed, but for some reason, despite a number of requests, it hasnt.
In trying to understand why it is Cisco, with such a huge R&D budget, can't seem to get some things working properly that the competiton has long ago solved and moved on with, I have come to the conclusion that it must be that Cisco propably didnt tap enough of the right (human) resources when it was developing its voice portfolio, and the lack of industry experience shows up in some random places. Sad to say, not paying attention to some of these details, to real world usage scenarios, makes what would be an otherwise super product, just good enough.
Cisco is the biggest networking vendor on the planet. People have a right to have high exectations of Cisco. Their marketing also conditions users and partners to expect more when using their solutions. While we accept that no one is perfect, not even the mighty Cisco, I think most of the complaints and dissapointment expressed in this forum, on this particular thread, are justified because there is a strong feeling that if Cisco can be such a trailblazer with their enterprise portfolio, that they should have understood the importance of ensuring and enforcing good quality control in the design and manufacture of the SMB portfolio. I honestly hope someone from "Corporate" or high enough to make a differnce, looks at this thread started by William and uses it to inspire the will to fix what needs to be fixed to redeem the UC320 in whatever incarnation, in the eyes of its partners (even former ones....such as William)and customers. This is beginning to look like a textbook case of how not to do product development.

Regarding the Webutil function

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for