Register xmltype column from one table as schema using DBMS_registerschema

I am attempting to do the following:
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema
(SCHEMAURL => 'CCD.xsd',
SCHEMADOC => xdbURIType(select SANDBOX.XHOLDER.SYS_NC_ROWINFO$ from SANDBOX.XHOLDER).getClob()
END;
But it doesn't like having a select statement where it does not expect one. I cannot find anything at all on doing what I am trying to do. Anyone with any ideas?
Thanks TONS!

Which schema are you working with. The one you pointed to appears to be self contained

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:hl7-org:v3" xmlns:mif="urn:hl7-org:v3/mif" xmlns:sch="http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron" targetNamespace="urn:hl7-org:v3" elementFormDefault="qualified">
     <xs:annotation>
          <xs:documentation>            $Id: Vocabulary.xml,v 1.1 2005/08/25 11:33:46 mcraig Exp $            RoseTree XML to Schema: $Id: VocabXMLtoXSD.xsl,v 1.6 2005/05/24 00:14:18 lmckenzi Exp $        </xs:documentation>
     </xs:annotation>
     <xs:simpleType name="Classes">
          <xs:restriction base="cs"/>
     </xs:simpleType>
     <xs:annotation>
          <xs:documentation>The following types are used internally in data types</xs:documentation>
     </xs:annotation>
     <xs:simpleType name="AddressPartType">
</xs:schema>

Similar Messages

How to insert records with LONG RAW columns from one table to another

Does anybody know how to use subquery to insert records with columns of LONG RAW datatype from one table to another? Can I add a WHERE clause in the subquery statement? Thanks.

Insert into ... Select statements are not supported for long or long raw. You will have to either use PL/SQL or convert your long raw to blobs.

Loading data from one table to another using cursor

Hi,
I have given the below command to load the data from 1 table to another using cursor.
declare
cursor mycursor IS
SELECT extract_name,from_date,to_date,BETA from temp_table where EXTRACT_NAME='GIFTCARD_DETAILS';
Begin
for mycursor_1 IN mycursor loop
insert into tmp_tab columns(col1,col2,col3,col5) values(mycursor_1.EXTRACT_NAME,mycursor_1.from_date,mycursor_1.to_date,mycursor_1.BETA);
End loop;
commit;
end;
It is working fine.
But I want to hard code some of the columns ( like flags ) which are not there in 1st table and load them into 2nd table.
In db2 we will give commands like
varSqlStatus=`db2 "declare mycurs cursor for select extract_name,from_date,to_date,BETA,'N','Y' from temp_table"`
varSqlStatus=`db2 "load from mycurs of cursor modified by identityignore insert into tmp_tab(col1,col2,col3,col5,col6,col7) nonrecoverable"`
But I want it in oracle 10g, Can any one help me in this.

Have you tried either of the two options :
1. Modify the CURSOR itself :
cursor mycursor IS
SELECT extract_name,from_date,to_date,BETA,'N','Y' from temp_table where EXTRACT_NAME='GIFTCARD_DETAILS';2. Modify the INSERT statement itself :
insert into tmp_tab columns(col1,col2,col3,col5,col6,col7) values(mycursor_1.EXTRACT_NAME,mycursor_1.from_date,mycursor_1.to_date,mycursor_1.BETA,'N','Y');

How can i transfer some fields from one table to another using a trigger

hi,
i have two tables;sales and accounts.i want in my accounts form to enter salesid which is then validated and if it exists in the sales table, some fields are copied to the accounts table automatically.how do i go about this.thanx

hi,
the code u gave me is not running.let me explain in
detail.i have two tables;sales and accounts in my
database (oracle 9i).each have a corresponding form
in the developer window.these tables are linked using
saleid.this id is entered and saved in the
database.when the person is paying in the cash
office,the saleid on an invoice form is entered on
the accounts form.it is supposed to search the sales
table and if the ids match,some records are extracted
from the sales table to the accounts form instead of
the accounts clerk entering the details all over
again.these details will be used to generate a
receipt an then the record on the accounts form is
saved to the database.the contents of the two tables
are:
sales(saleid(pk),startno,endno,quantity,amount,saledat
e)
accounts(receiptno(pk),saleid,startno,endno,quantity,a
mount).
please advice and thanks very muchWhat does it mean "not running" ?
Sure, it is running.
Did you tested my example ?
And it does exactly what you need.
You didn't provided table structures and insert statements,
that's why i showed you the method on 2 emp- tables.
But it is exactly, what do you need.
Change my emp_1 on your sales,
and my emp_2 on your accounts,
and compare the results.
If you cannot directly copy and paste
and say to your teacher / chief "My homework / task is ready"
it doesn't mean, that the solution didn't provided ...

Needed help to add columns from one table to another table

Hi,
I have emp and dept tables. I think most of all might know what columns it's contain. Now I want to create table emp_dept with all emp and dept table columns.
I have wrote the below query it's worked too. But I think there should be some more other queries to get accomplish the same task. Plz let me know.
create table emp_dept as select a.*, b.dname, b.loc from emp a full outer join dept b on a.deptno = b.deptno where 1=2
Thanks for your time..

Hi,
1004909 wrote:
Hi,
I have emp and dept tables. I think most of all might know what columns it's contain. Now I want to create table emp_dept with all emp and dept table columns.
I have wrote the below query it's worked too. But I think there should be some more other queries to get accomplish the same task. Why do you think that?
Plz let me know.
create table emp_dept as select a.*, b.dname, b.loc from emp a full outer join dept b on a.deptno = b.deptno where 1=2"WHERE 1 = 2" means you want to create the table, but not put any rows in it. In that case, theere's no need for a full outer join; a simple inner join would do just as well.
There is no single "right" or "best" table. (Most of us would have differerent jobs if there were.)
It does, however, make sense to talk about the "right" or "best" table for some specific purpose .
The emp and dept tables in the scott schema are great for transaction processing, where rows are frequenctly INSERTed, UPDATEd and/or DELETEd. For example, if department 10 moves from New York to Pune, you only have to find and UPDATE 1 row, and that one UPDATE will affect all employees in departemnt 10, regardess of how many there are.
What purpose will the emp_dept table have? Why is the table design used in the scott schema not best for you?
One possibility is that you need a tale that is very fast to query, even though it may be very inefficient for transactions. For example, you might want a data warehouse that is only refreshed once a day, and were you can run several common queries quickly, without joining the emp and dept tales.
Another possibility is that your data model (that is, what are the entities and the attributes) is different. For example, you may have a model where employees King and Miller both work in department 10, but King's location is New York, but Miller's is Pune.
In either of these situations, the table you posted migt be the best design. Why are you asking the question? What is the problem with the emp_dept table you posted?

Including column from fact table reduces number of rows returned

Hello
I am facing this issue where in a report I select 5 columns from a fact table. Out of these five columns one of the column is "Amount" for which the aggregation rule is defined as Sum in RPD.
When I include these five column and filter results based on some criterion , I get all the rows (three rows) that satisfy the criterion. No I add a sixth column to my report and suddenly I only see one row returned by my report. Addition of this sixth column does not affect the criterion as the criterion is not based on this column. But this sixth column is a calculated column.
I tried different things but because the report was just getting columns from one table (fact) and suddenly inclusion of one column leads to reduction in number of rows , I was unable to find any reason why would that happen.
So I thought that some one in community may know that in what scenario this happens.
Thanks

Are there any repeated values? I'm wondering if what you're seeing is actually suppression of repetition in the results. Edit the analysis, go to the criteria tab, click column properties, go to the Column Format tab, and change the setting for value suppression from 'Suppress" to "Repeat". Repeat for each of your 6 columns and check the outcome.
Otherwise, I would try testing with other calculations and also bring in some columns from dimension tables to see how this affects the result. You should be able to come up with a case-by-case scenario to work out exactly what causes the rows to be suppressed which will get us one step to closer to working out why the rows get suppressed.
Thanks,
George

Inserting data from one table into another table using PL/SQL

HI,
I am trying to insert values from one table into another using PL procedure, the values I want to retrieve from the table riverside1 are charac_id and charac_type and insert these values into another table called riverside2 , the stored procedure zorgs_gorfs(x,y) accepts two parameters which are 2 charac_id's of d characters in riverside1 then using insert statements inserts these characters from riverside1 into riverside2.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE zorgs_gorfs(x IN NUMBER, y IN NUMBER) AS
     BEGIN
          INSERT INTO riverside2
               (charac_id)
          VALUES
               (x);
INSERT INTO riverside2
               (charac_id)
          VALUES
               (y);
      END zorgs_gorfs;
/This works but the problem im having is that when I also try to insert the charac_type as well as the charac_id it doesnt work below is the code:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE zorgs_gorfs(x IN NUMBER, y IN NUMBER) AS
     BEGIN
          INSERT INTO riverside2
               (charac_id,charac_tye)
          VALUES
               (Select
                    charac_id,
                    charc_type
               FROM
                    riverside1
               WHERE
                    charac_id = x);
      END zorgs_gorfs;
/can someone kindly sort me out

modify this sql
INSERT INTO riverside2
               (charac_id,charac_tye)
          VALUES
               (Select
                    charac_id,
                    charc_type
               FROM
                    riverside1
               WHERE
                    charac_id = x);as
INSERT INTO riverside2
               (charac_id,charac_tye)
          VALUES
               (Select
                    charac_id,
                    charc_type
               FROM
                    riverside1
               WHERE
                    charac_id in ( x,y));But my suggestion would be consider revising your approach. It does not look that good.
Thanks,
karthick.

How to convert data when transferring from one table to another

I have two tables and these are the structure of the tables
create table E1(
ID NUMBER
,NAME VARCHAR2(30)
, DESIGNATION VARCHAR2(30)
,GENDER VARCHAR2(10));
create table E2(
ID NUMBER
,NAME VARCHAR2(30)
, DESIGNATION VARCHAR2(3)
,GENDER NUMBER); Now I want to transfer records from one table to another using a master tables where data are compared because the datatypes in tables are different
The first one is a gender table to match the gender and convert
create table Gender(
E1 varchar2(10),
E2 number);The second is for the designation
create table Designation(
E1 varchar2(30),
E2 varchar2(3);How to match and convert the data so that it can be transfered.

Peeyush wrote:
Can we do it with the help of a cursor.
All SQL executed by the database are parsed as cursors and executed as cursors.
I mean I have to insert data in bulk and I want to use cursor for it.The read and write (select and insert) are done by the SQL engine. The read part reads data and passes it to the write part that inserts the data.
Now why would using PL/SQL and bulk processing make this faster? It will reside in-between the read part and the write part being done by the SQL engine.
So the SQL engine reads the data. This then travels all the way to the PL/SQL engine as a bulk collect. PL./SQL then issues an insert (the write part to be done by the SQL engine). And now this very same data travels all the way from the PL/SQL engine to the SQL engine for insertion.
So just how is this approach, where you add extra travel time to data, faster?
and i want to commit the transaction after every 50 recordsWhy? What makes you think this is better? What makes you think you have a problem with not committing every 50 rows?

I can't import a table contains BLOB column from one user to another user.

1) I create two user both have connect role,and each has its own tablespace, DDL:
create user d2zd identified by d2zd default tablespace d2zd quota unlimited on d2zd account unlock;
grant connect to d2zd;
create user d3zd identified by d3zd default tablespace d3zd quota unlimited on d3zd account unlock;
grant connect to d3zd;
2)Then enter oracle as d2zd and create a table contains BLOB column and insert data to the table.
3) export d2zd as follow:
exp d2zd/d2zd file=d2zd.dmp
4) import to d3zd as follow:
imp d3zd/d3zd fromuser=d2zd touser=d3zd file=d2zd.dmp
the question is the table with BOLB colum can't be import,
it says:have no privilege on tablespace d2zd.
How can I import a table contains BLOB column from one user to another user?

Hi - the reason for as our friend already told ist that a blob can be stored outside of the table segment, in another Tablespace, This is for performance reason.
Sou you would need to have Quota on two tablespaces.
the one which holds the table segment the other which holds the blob(segment).
Regards
Carl
Message was edited by:
kreitsch

How to insert select columns from one internal table to another

Hi,
How to insert select columns from one internal table to another based on condition as we do from a standart table to internal table.
regards,
Sriram

Hi,
If your question is for copying data from 1 int table to other ;
we can use
APPEND LINES OF it_1 TO it_2.
or if they have different columns then:
loop at it_1 into wa_it1.
move wa_it1-data to wa_it2-d1.
apped wa_it2 to it_2.
clear wa_it2.
endloop.
thnxz

Drag a column from one position to another within the table.

Hello All,
In Web Dynpro Java, Is it possible to provide user a functionality with which he/she can move the columns of a table from one position to another ?
Scenario : Users want flexibility to decide the location the columns as per their convinience while they are working with the application.
So can we develop some code or can we use some UI element so that user is able to drag a column from one position to another within the table.
Regards
Mrinalini.

Hi Mrinalini,
Yes this is possible you can try to move the table columns (Change the order). for this you don't need to do additional coding or property change its a default property for web Dynpro java tables.
Regards
Jeetendra

Adding Data From One Table to Another

Now, this doesn't strike me as a particularly complex problem, but I've either strayed outside the domain of Numbers or I'm just not looking at the problem from the right angle. In any case, I'm sure you guys can offer some insight.
What I'm trying to do is, essentially, move data from one table to another. One table is a calendar, a simple two column 'date/task to be completed' affair, the other is a schedule of jogging workouts, i.e, times, distances. Basically, I'm trying to create a formula that copies data from the second table onto the first but only for odd days of the week, excepting Sundays (and assuming Monday as the start of the week). Now, this isn't the hard part, I can do that. The problem comes when I replicate the formula down the calendar. Even on the days when the 'if' statement identifies it as an 'even day', the cell reference to the appropriate workout on the second table is incremented, so when it comes to the next 'odd day', it has skipped a workout.
I can't seem to see any way of getting it to specifically copy the NEXT line in the second table, and not the corresponding line.
This began as a distraction to try and organise my running so I could see at a glance what I had to do that day and track my progress, but now it's turned into an obsession. SURELY there's a solution?
Cheers.

Hi Sealatron,
Welcome to Apple Discussions and the Numbers '09 forum.
Several possible ways to move the data occur to me, but the devil's in the details of how the data is currently arranged.
Is it
• a list of three workouts, one for each of Monday, Wednesday and Friday, then the same three repeated the following week?
• an open-ended list that does not repeat?
• something else?
Regards,
Barry

Loading data from one table to another table

I need to load the data (data conversion) from one table to 3 different table.
I have to load the data from Source table to following 3 target tables.
So Consumer table has email pk and it has relationship with CONSUMER_RCV table and CONSUMER_RCV
table has relationship with CONSUMER_ATTR table. I am doing right now with pl/sql but I am looking
to use MULTI INSERT or SQL*LOADER or another efficient way.
I tried with MultiInsert but it getting failed as it's violating Unique Constraints as source table might contains
Duplicate emails.
Could you please show me how I can load the data efficiently?
Also I need to load in CONSUMER_ATTR table from CONTACT table which has ATTR1, ATTR2 columns.
so My mapping will be ...
Contact.email, first_name, last_name will go into Consumer table
then in CONSUMER_RCV, I generate the id column value by sequence, load email and DATE_CREATEd from contact table
And rest of the value is hard coded
Then in CONSUMER_ATTR table I will generate the CONSUMER_ATTR_id through sequence, for ID, will use the same
id column value which I have generated by sequence in CONSUMER_RCV, then put the attr_type = 'ATTR1' and for
attr_value column I will insert the value from contact table's ATTR1 value,
Then generate another CONSUMER_ATTR_ID, will use the same id column value which I have generated by sequence
in CONSUMER_RCV, then put the attr_type = 'ATTR2' and for
attr_value column I will insert the value from contact table's ATTR2 value,
Please let me know if you need further explanation.
I am using Oracle 9i R2.
Please consider CONTACT is Source table, CONSUMER is a Target1, CONSUMER_RCV is a Target2 and CONSUMER_ATTR is a Target3
to simplify the problem.
Following is the Table structure
=========================
CREATE TABLE CONTACT (
ID VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL, -- will go into Target1
EMAIL VARCHAR2 (100) ,      -- might be duplicate and will go into Target1 and Target2
FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL, -- will go into Target1
LAST_NAME VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL, -- will go into Target1
COUNTRY VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL, -- will go into Target1
PHONE VARCHAR2 (100), -- will go into Target1
NOTIFY VARCHAR2 (3), -- will go into Target2 table's RECEIVE_EMAIL column
CREATE_DATE DATE ,               -- will go into Target1 and target2
ATTR1 VARCHAR2 (400),           -- will go into Target3 as attr_type= ATTR1 and will load actual value in ATTR_VALUE
ATTR2 VARCHAR2(100),          -- will go into Target3 as attr_type= ATTR2 and will load actual value in ATTR_VALUE
ATTR2 VARCHAR2(100),          -- will go into Target3 as attr_type= ATTR1 and will load actual value in ATTR_VALUE
CONSTRAINT CONTACT_PK
PRIMARY KEY ( USER_ID ) ) ;
CREATE TABLE CONSUMER(
EMAIL VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL, -- PK
TITLE VARCHAR2 (40),
FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2 (40),
LAST_NAME VARCHAR2 (40),
ADDRESS1 VARCHAR2 (40),
ADDRESS2 VARCHAR2 (40),
CITY VARCHAR2 (30),
STATE          VARCHAR2 (30),
ZIP          VARCHAR2 (10),
COUNTRY VARCHAR2 (40),
PHONE VARCHAR2 (15),
DATE_CREATED DATE NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT CONSUMER_PK
PRIMARY KEY ( EMAIL ) ) ;
CREATE TABLE CONSUMER_RCV (
ID                VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL,-- PK
EMAIL VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL,-- FK reference to Consumer
SITE VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL, -- default website
RECEIVE_EMAIL VARCHAR2 (1),
CREATE_DATE DATE NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT CONSUMER_RCV_PK
PRIMARY KEY (ID) ) ;
ALTER TABLE CONSUMER_RCV ADD CONSTRAINT CONSUMER_RCV_FK
FOREIGN KEY (EMAIL)
REFERENCES CONSUMER (EMAIL) ;
CREATE TABLE CONSUMER_ATTR (
CONSUMER_ATTR_ID           VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL, -- PK
ID                     VARCHAR2 (40) NOT NULL, -- FK reference to COnsumer_RCV
ATTR_TYPE           VARCHAR2 (100) NOT NULL,
ATTR_VALUE           VARCHAR2 (4000) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT CONSUMER_ATTR_PK
PRIMARY KEY ( CONSUMER_ATTR_ID ) ) ;
ALTER TABLE CONSUMER_ATTR ADD CONSTRAINT CONSUMER_ATTR_FK
FOREIGN KEY (CONSUMER_ATTR_ID)
REFERENCES CONSUMER_RCV (ID) ;

HI Hema,
How are the entries related.. is it like for one entry in y table there are more than one entry in x table then you have to use loop with in loop , here are the both the conditions.
1) For each entry in Y there are more than one entries in X
sort y by quota trpid.
sort x by quota trpid.
loop at y.
loop at x where quota eq y-quota
                        and trpid eq y-trpid.
z-value = x-value.
append z.
endloop.
endloop.
2) For each y there is one entry in x table.
sort y by quota trpid.
sort x by quota trpid.
loop at y.
read table x with key quota = y-quota
                            trpid = y-trpid binary search.
if sy-subrc eq 0.
z-value = x-value.
append z.
Endif.
endloop.
Mahesh

How to copy file from one table to another table at another database

I need to transfer my tables from one workspace and schema to another workspace and schema. Basically I need to create again all the tables at this new schema. How could I transfer data from tha table at old schema to the table at new schema when this table has files stored in it? (data type is blob)
thank you so much,
Silver

Hello Silver,
Depending which database you're using (if it's available) I would recommend to use datapump.
Datapump allows you to copy an entire schema to another database, it's the "new" export/import you might now.
Regards,
Dimitri
http://dgielis.blogspot.com/
http://www.apex-evangelists.com/
http://www.apexblogs.info/
REWARDS: Please remember to mark helpful or correct posts on the forum

How to delete a column from the table control in module pool?

Hi,
can any one please tell How to delete a column from the table control in module pool?
thanks in advance
warm regards
HareeshKumar N

hi hareesh,
I think it is better to hide it.
How to hide: You can check this link
Dynamic Hide column in table control

Register xmltype column from one table as schema using DBMS_registerschema

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for