Regular flag setting in ECC6.0

In R/3 4.7, the regular flag is set at corporate level.
In ECC 6.0, is it behaving in the same way?
Here is a scenarios.
A. Item = #ABC with VENDOR = #123 is set as regular vendor for purchasing organization, #KLM for infocatgeory 0.
B. Item = #ABC with VENDOR = #123 is set as regular vendor for purchasing organization, #XYZ for infocatgeory 0.
Now when B is changed to
Item = #ABC with VENDOR = #456 is set as regular vendor for purchasing organization, #XYZ for infocatgeory 0.
The record,
Item = #ABC with VENDOR = #123 for purchasing organization, #XYZ for infocatgeory 0 will have it regular flag reset to SPACE.
This had affected
Item = #ABC with VENDOR = #123 for purchasing organization, #KLM for infocatgeory 0 which is still using the vendor as regular vendor.
Has anyone raise this issue before? What the outcome in ECC6.0?

No reply from the forum

Similar Messages

GR_NON_VAL flag setting in ECC for SRM PO

Hi all,
SRM 5.0 ECS Sp12.
When we create a PO with multiple a/c assgt,the ECC PO which gets created always has the GR_NON_VAL flag set as "X".
Now if I uncheck the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " in SRM PO,then the PO replication fails in ECC and in SRM I get the below error :
With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator
When I check the data which is passed to ECC,the GR_NON_VAL flag is also blank for the PO after the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " are unchecked in SRM PO.
Can someone let me know if in ECS , the GR_NON_VAL flag is always passed as blank and gets set to "X"based on ECC settings.If so,which settings in ECC determine the GR_NON_VAL flag to be set?
Can someone explain the istd behaviour for the GR_NON_VLAg flag in ECC PO for ECS when SRM PO with multiple a/c assignnment is changed for indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   "so that they are set to blank,Please advise.

HI
in standard we canl fill the flag GR_NON_VAL in SRM side but
the itemx structure of PO in ERP system set to space. After this mapping
BAPIs will be called.
wa_bapi_poitemx-po_itemx = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-no_more_gr = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-final_inv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_ind = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-delete_ind = 'X'.
delivery tolerance has to be taken over
    wa_bapi_poitemx-over_dlv_tol = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-unlimited_dlv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-under_dlv_tol = 'X'.
note 644721, the Goods receipt non-valuated should be set according
to the backend customizing for this we have to clear the x-flag
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_non_val = ' '.
    wa_bapi_poitem-gr_non_val = ' '.
The redetermination will happen in PO create / change process
(within BAPI_PO_CHANGE and BAPI_PO_CREATE1).
1353431    ECS: PO in ERP always created with GR_NON_V
Summer

Email - Flag set to seen on server

Hi Experts,
In my application, the user reads his inbox in the Exchange Server for a particular mail. But some of the clients have their flags set as seen on the server when they recieve mails on outlook. In this case, the particular mail is unread in his Inbox, but the flags are set to seen on the server. My application access the mail server. The company policy does not allow most to keep a copy of their mail on the mail server. So how do I change my application in a way that this issue becomes solved.
Regards,
Abdullah

answered

GR Based INV flag set on Purchase Order

Hello,
We are on SRM 5.5 and R3 ECC 6.0 classic scenario. We want to swihtch off the GR Based Invoice flag which is maintained in de vendor master. Vendor has no info record or contract. When creating a PO directly in R3 the flag is also disabled on the PO. However, when we create a shopping cart, the system automatically creates the purchase req and when the purchaser creates the Purchase order the GR Based Inv. flag is set again ? Can anybody let me know how this is possible ?
Thanks as eve for your help.
Antoinette

Hi Antoinette Stork,
Here is the way we have achieved. I am not an ABAPer and hence providing you more concepts than code.
01) A custom program is written and is scheduled on hourly basis as a back ground job.
02) This program is executed after the BBP_VENDOR_SYNC is executed as a background job as well.
03) BBP_VENDOR_SYNC will bring the updates and new vendors from the R/3 back end.
04) This will bring the vendors with the confirmation flag set on SRM (no corresponding field exists on the R/3 side vendor master) and also will check the GR based invoice verification flag on (the corresponding field exists on the ECC vendor master).
05) After 15 minutes the custom program will read the BUT000 table for the total number of vendors changed or created between two successive jobs.
06) Then query on the VENMAP table to get the GUIDs of the corresponding vendors.
07) Within the custom program use the FMs
     BBP_BUPA_FRG0060_CHANGE and
     BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT
to set the flags for
      goodsrec_confex = ' ' and
      GR_BASEDIV
Sorry for being unable to provide you the code dump. This is working perfectly fine for us.
Also, we have used the badi "BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI" with the method "BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND" as a safety net as our invoice processing is two way match and we do not absolutely want the flags to be set to the R/3 PO.
DATA: ls_bapi_poitem TYPE bbps_if_bapimepoitem_pi.
Loop through the item details that gets passed to Backend*
LOOP AT ct_bapi_poitem INTO ls_bapi_poitem.
Clear the GR and GR-Based Invoice Verification Indicator.*
    CLEAR : ls_bapi_poitem-gr_ind,
            ls_bapi_poitem-gr_basediv.
    MODIFY ct_bapi_poitem FROM ls_bapi_poitem
           TRANSPORTING gr_ind gr_basediv.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.
Hope this helps,
DV

Correcting POs with GR Based IV Flag set

We are on SRM 550 SP10 ECS. One of the bugs in the earlier SP level related to POs was
GR Based IV is checked if GR is checked and IR is checked ignoring the master vendor record information related to this flag. This is fixed in Note 1010791. This will fix the new POs created after the note is applied. I am wondering if anybody knows of any z program which will unset the earlier POs (created before the note is applied) for the GR Based IV flag. With the flag set, we cannot enter the invoice before the Goods receipt.

hi, you've mentioned that "PO's already delivery completed" that means GRs are done for all these POs. You can not change GR based IV indicator after posting follow on docs.
still check below OSS note which explains how and when you can change it (even after psoting of follow on docs like GR and IV)
Note 550163 - Change of GR-based invoice verification indicator
Also, if GRs are already done for these 2000 POs you should not worry about updating this indicator as main purpose of this indicator is to make sure that GR is done before posting Invoice and you already completed that.
yogesh

Dirty flag set for readonly file page

We are using BDB 4.8.26 transactional data store on Windows 2008 R2.
DB is logging the message "dirty flag set for readonly file page" to the error log ... this entry was logged 17 times in a 24 hr period. The system processes about 3-5 requests a second.
We also are having an incorrect "SECONDARY inconsistent with primary" error reported - this used to be very rare but has increased with increased concurrency. But the dirty flag error is recent - after we dropped a secondary and added a new one - there was no error during the secondary drop and rebuild process.
Appreciate any help on this.
Thanks
Kimman Balakrishnan

Hi Kimman,
I assume you are not opening your databases with the DB_RDONLY flag. This could be cause by not running recovery after a system or application failure. Make sure you run recovery correctly, single threaded, after each system or application failure; review the Architecting Transactional Data Store applications documentation section.
Regards,
Andrei

Error filesystem Inode has EXTENTS_FL flag set... [SOLVED]

archlinux i686
ext3 partition /dev/sda2/ system loaded at '/'
the system has worked with the machine for ~ 1 year. at 'Checking Filesystems', there is a spontaneous error that is first time at this machine/system and it is new to me.
Inode 77077 has EXTENTS_FL flag set on filesystem without extents support. [FAIL]
system will not load after this filesystem check failed.
I lack skill to repair this problem. Will someone direct me to any resource?
thank you
Last edited by andrewjames (2010-03-31 01:54:22)

an attempt to resolve the file system errors, loaded a system archlinux from disc to fsck.ext3 the filesystem partition /dev/sda2 that was error.
the fsck.ext3 first found the error at inode 77077 that number was printed at the initial error. then fsck found more errors, at every error there was a prompt to 'CLEAR' or 'Fix' the error. When those plurous errors happened, I exited 'control+c' the fsck to automate the repair.
there is a switch (flag) to fsck '-y' to answer 'yes' to all questions in attempt to repair a filesystem easier. note, the switch '-v' prints extra description as fsck works.
once those switches were on, the filesystem found ~1000 various errors that were automatically 'CHECK'ed or 'Fix'ed.
I have no list of all the various errors. For the EXTENTS_FL error, when I queried help, there is few or no definate solutions. Although I have interested to know causes to the errors, I think the errors are generic enough that the fsck automated is a routine solution.
the machine has another problem to load the basic system 'BIOS', perhaps the older age. it often beeps at load, pre operative system loader 'grub'.
unfortunately, after the fsck with the restore disc archlinux system that loader is now a problem. after some forcsive machine off then on, the system may load, then I will report if the fsck worked to resolve an archlinux system that works from the filesystem at internal disc part /dev/sda2

POD flag set up automatically after BP replicated from CRM to ECC

Hi Experts,
we are working on CRM 5.0 and ECC 6 as backend system.
*Requirement :*We will create a BP record in CRM and the same will be replicated to ECC.For the BPs which is replicated to ECC from CRM , the "Relevant for POD "(Proof of Delivery) flag should set up automatically.
Note: we have done the following settings
1) Created a Reference Customer in ECC in which we have set up a flag "Relevant for POD ".
2) Initial download Reference BP from ECC to CRM by going to TCode:CRMC_BUPA_CONSUM in CRM.
3) Maintained relevant Sales Areas for the BP.
Question:
In CRM we dont have field called "Relevant for POD ".How can we populate the field "Relevant for POD " for the Business Partner that is Created in CRM and replicated to ECC?
For any helpful answer points will be awarded.
Thanks in advance,
-Rahul.
Edited by: rahul biji on Feb 12, 2008 6:21 PM

Hi,
did you find a solution to make this work ? We have the same problem with other fields that are only available in R/3. We are thinking of adding a FM to fill these fields in table COM_BUPA_CALL_FU. Did you find another way ?
Best regards
Annette

Iterate DB using DBcursor- get with DB_DBT_USERMEM flag set for DBT

Have BDB running in TDS mode. Want to iterate over a complete database using a DBcursor from start to end. Set the DB_DBT_USERMEM flag on the DBT structure with data pointing to a fixed sized user allocated memory block to hold the contents of a single record read. Currently cursor-get fails with DB_BUFFER_SMALL. I assume that this is because cursor->get retrieves more than one record.
Is it possible to iterate over the DB using the said cursor while allocating user-memory for only one (1) database record? Each call to cursor->get with DB_NEXT / DB_PREV / DB_FIRST /DB_LAST etc would update the single record entry.

Hi Kedar,
No, DBcursor->get() retrieves multiple key/data items if you're using the DB_MULTIPLE or DB_MULTIPLE_KEY flags. See "Bulk Retrieval":
[http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/programmer_reference/am_misc_bulk.html#am_misc_bulk_get]
You only want to retrieve a single record per call, hence are not using the aforementioned flags. In this case the DB_BUFFER_SMALL error indicates that the length of the requested/retrieved item is larger than that specified for the DBT via its "ulen" field.
[http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/api_reference/C/dbt.html#dbt_DB_DBT_USERMEM]
If you want to iterate over all the records in the database (including duplicates, if the database is configured to support them) you should use the DB_NEXT flag.
Note than when the DB_BUFFER_SMALL error is returned the "size" field of the DBT is set to the the length needed for the requested item; you can inspect that value to decide how to size your supplied buffer (or you may know in advance the size of the data items in the database).
Here is an excerpt from the example code in "Retrieving records with a cursor" with the necessary adjustments for the data DBT:
[http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/programmer_reference/am_cursor.html#am_curget]
     DB *dbp;
     DBC *dbcp;
     DBT key, data;
     int close_db, close_dbc, ret;
     /* Acquire a cursor for the database. */
     if ((ret = dbp->cursor(dbp, NULL, &dbcp, 0)) != 0) {
          dbp->err(dbp, ret, "DB->cursor");
          goto err;
     close_dbc = 1;
     /* Initialize the key/data return pair. */
     memset(&key, 0, sizeof(key));
     memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
     /* Retrieve data item in user suplied buffer. */
#define BUFFER_LENGTH 1024
     if ((data.data = malloc(BUFFER_LENGTH)) == NULL)
          return (errno);
     data.ulen = BUFFER_LENGTH;
     data.flags = DB_DBT_USERMEM;
     /* You can supply your own buffer for the key as well. */
     /* Iterate through the database. */
     while ((ret = dbcp->c_get(dbcp, &key, &data, DB_NEXT)) == 0)
          /* Operate on the retrieved items. */
     if (ret != DB_NOTFOUND) {
          dbp->err(dbp, ret, "DBcursor->get");
          goto err;
err:
     // ...Regards,
Andrei

Impact deletion flag set process order

If i have "Set deletion flag for old process order" after the same any impact in Finance or production side.
Chintan

Hi,
You should set the deletion flag only for orders:
which are delivered or technically completed
for which variances have been calculated
for which you do not anticipate any further follow-up costs
If follow-up costs must be charged to the object, you can remove the deletion flag (DLFL). Deletion indicators (DLT), however, cannot be withdrawn.
As long as the accounting period is not yet closed, data (such as from results analysis) can still be transferred to Financial Accounting (FI). The FI period should be closed before you can set the deletion indicator (DLT), since no more costs can be settled to FI after that point.
When the orders are deleted, the quantity information on the routing operations is also deleted.
Regards,
Antje

Deletion Flag setting Error message for production order

"Unprocessed future change recs for orders prevent del. flag/completion"
I tried to used COFC and CO1P but didn't work out?
How to fix this issue i am trying to set deletion flags for certain production orders?
If i even found errors in final confirmations how to fix them

Hi Aparna,
This is absolutely fine to set the deletion flag to archieve the Production Orders.
For this error, which you are getting, there could be entries in COGI or CO1P..
Whether you are using Process Control (check in OPK4)?
If that is the case you should have got the entries in CO1P.
Can you see any entries in COGI? even 102 movement against the order?
Check once again and revert for further discussion..
Regards,
Siva

To delete the default flag set in ship to address screen in shopping car.

Hi All,
I have a requirement to delete the default flag that will be set in ship to address screen in shopping cart in SRM system.
I am able to view the list of ship to address throuh Edit internal address ( transaction BBPADDRINTC) and I am able to change the default. The requirement is, the requester should not set default at all so it should be cleared even if he sets.
I tried with Badi - BUPA_ADDR_UPDATE. But couldn't find it useful.
Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
Ramya

Hi
You must have maintained address number of ship to attribute in the organisation structure .
so there you take up action.
ADDR_SHIPT = 1233
so CHECK THIS ADDRESS NUMBER 1234
br
muthu

Item partner flag set in Orders06 Idoc

Hi,
I am trying to set the item partners flag in a sales order creation Idoc Order06. Unfortuantely I am not able to find a placeholder or a segment field to map this flag in the Orders06 Idoc. So I am not able to overwrite the ship to addresses coming inthrough the interfaces. Please advise.
Teresa

Thanks Ravi for response. i had super busy week could't get back.i think i could't not provide enough details about the issue.
we have maintained 6 different languages in material master in purchse order text tab-additional data Tab.
when i set the deletion flag in MDM .MATMASS idoc generates successfully and i can see field carrying deletion flag indicator and it does set deletion flag on ECC side but after that if i check the additional data tab where we have maintained the material description for 6 different languages i see only three left other three are wiped off.it also shows in change log that changes has been made in those value but not sure about the root cause.i want to set deletion flag but no change in description.
Thanks again for your interest.

Historical Record flag set when creating business event type

Hi all
One of our users created a business event type using the master data catalogue. There was a pre-existing group and the event type was created one level down from the group.
Once the event type was created and he tried to edit it he got an error message that said that the object has a historical record flag. This is also indicated in the table (HRP1000-HISTO). He then tried to recreate the course again with the same result.
I have not been able to find where this is set (only found something under follow-up activities which is not relevant to this case). Can anyone help please - how is this setting made? Any ideas if it can be removed?
Thanks in advance
Liezl

Thank you so much (sorry for the delay in replying), our work server blocked notifications from being sent to my e-mail! I still don't know how the historical records flag got set, but we managed to get rid of it!
Regards
Liezl

Arrowpoint cookie HTTP Only flag set.

Hi All,
I have a site running an application on which we have identified a vulnerability we wish to close. The CSS11501 is using the advance balance arrowpoint cookie method, however tests are showing that the HTTP only parameter is not set. I am unable to find a way of doing this at present. Does anyone know how to acheive this?
Until I can do so there is a remote possibilty I am leaving my application open to cross site scripting attacks.
Microsoft use the HTTPOnly cookie option which sets a HTTPOnly flag. he following url has some information for review.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Alfie...

Alfie,
your security test tool assume the CSS is a webserver and therefore complains when seeing some missing *flag*.
However, you won't be able to attack the CSS with whatever method that works against a webserver.
We have our own onboard DOS feature.
So, there is no option to use this microsoft HTTPOnly flag because there is no need for it.
Make sure the servers behind the CSS are protected and have your HTTPOnly flag.
Gilles.

Regular flag setting in ECC6.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for