Release Authority Issue

Hi Experts,
The senario is as a SOX measure we want to restrict the USER from releasing the PUR Doc. created by himself.
Means Person who has created document should not be allowed to release the same.
Is there any workarround.
Thanks in adv. for the help

Badi - ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST Enhancements for Processing Enjoy Purchase Order: Customer
Check it gets called on release
Create a message, on Check/Save issue error if Approver = PO Creator. I'm assuming there is more than one potential approver at the level, otherwise you need to determine a different approver before PO is saved.
See also Exit
M06E000 Role determination for release of purchasing documents
You should be able to get what you want with one of these.
Regards,
Nick

Similar Messages

PO not going in account of release authority.

Hi all
In my release strategy for POs, Porg, net order value and Material Group are defined as a chracteristics. while creating PO with multiple lines with multiple Material Groups it is going to incorrect release authority. that is picking another release strategy. i m checking properly in PRD AND DEV Servers. in DEV Server it is working properly. why it is not working in PRD Sever.can any one suggest the solution to this?

Hi,
I am not understand why you put up the release stratezy at material group level because material group is on item level. As PO has been released fully not on item level basis.Instead of placing the release stratezy at item level,why not you put it only on header level.cause no where you release the PO at item level. But it will create only confusion for picking the release stratezy.you can put release stratezy on one more char. i.e. Incoterm(header level).
So please convey your client to put release stratezy only on header level.
Thanx

Release Build Issue

Hello!
I'm stuck on something pertaining to my release build. It's not working. I know there could be a lot of reasons for this, most related to path dependencies within my code. In my troubleshooting, however, I've stumbled across an issue that I think is at the root of the problem. I'm hoping someone has a solution!
Here it is:
I'm using Flex Builder 3, and it's an AS3 project. Running the project is no problem. Works great from the bin-debug folder. As soon as I pull the files in the bin-debug folder into another folder, however, it no longer runs. I'm doing this in the most basic way possible. Here are the steps I'm taking:
1. create a new folder at the same level as bin-debug. Calling it, creatively, bin-debug2.
2. copying all the files in bin-debug and pasting them in bin-debug2.
3. opening my browser and surfing to bin-debug/project.html - works perfect.
4. opening my browser and surfing to bin-debug2/project.html - doesn't work.
How is it possible for the exact same files not to work just because the parent folder has a different name?
I believe answering this will solve my release build issues.
Thanks!!

Hi Greg,
Thank you for taking time to help me troubleshoot this.
Running the bin-debug version of the projects main .html page in a browser works. Meaning, the page loads, I see the default background color I've set in the compiler, and the opening animation starts.
Then I copy and paste all of the files in bin-debug to bin-debug2. Try running the exact same .html file. The page opens in the browser and I see the default background color I've set in the compiler. The opening animation never starts.
Thanks,
Jake

Authority issues after homogeneous system copy - as/400 v5r1 - R/3 4.6C

Hello,
I am trying to complete a homogeneous system copy of an R/3 system.
The source system is PRD - the target system is TST. The hardware platforms are different (both iSeries) but the kernel/pdf/OS patch levels are all identical.
The process I have follow so far is this:
1. Preprocessing of the R3PRDDATA library.
2. SAVLIB of R3PRDDATA.
3. Delete old R3TSTDATA lib on target system using QSECOFR
4. Create new R3TSTDATA using SQLUTIL as TSTOFR (TSTOFR is my user for the target system)
5. CHGOBJOWN OBJ(R3TSTDATA) OBJTYPE(*LIB) NEWOWN(TSTOFR)
6. GRTOBJAUT OBJ(R3TSTDATA) OBJTYPE(LIB) USER(SAP02) AUT(CHANGE)
7. Detach existing Journal, create new journal receiver, create new journal ...
DLTJRN JRN(R3TSTDATA/QSQJRN)
DLTJRNRCV JRNRCV(R3TSTJRN/QSQJRN0001)
CRTJRNRCV JRNRCV(R3TSTJRN/QSQJRN0001) THRESHOLD(500000)
CHGOBJOWN OBJ(R3TSTJRN/QSQJRN0001) OBJTYPE(*JRNRCV) NEWOWN(R3OWNER)
CRTJRN JRN(R3TSTDATA/QSQJRN) JRNRCV(R3TSTJRN/QSQJRN0001) MNGRCV(SYSTEM) DLTRCV(NO)
CHGOBJOWN OBJ(R3TSTDATA/QSQJRN) OBJTYPE(*JRN) NEWOWN(R3OWNER)
8. RSTLIB from tape.
9. AS4FIXFILE on R3TSTDATA with
   DBLIB         R3TSTDATA
   CHGOWN   *NO
   ENDJRN      *YES
   STRJRN      *YES
   CHGFILE     *NO
10. install license key
So from this point the system will start without a problem. However whenever I try and write something to the database I get this type of error (via SM21 or ABAP dump) message:
Database error -551 at SEL access to table BTCOPTIONS
            Not authorized to object BTCOPTIONS in R3TSTDATA type *file
            Job=378721/TST02/WP02
Database error text........: "Not authorized to object SCPRACTR in R3TSTDATA
type *FILE. Job=379089/TST02/WP00"
I have also run GRTOBJAUT for the - TST02 user on the R3TSTDATA lib but still the same problem.
I'm certain the issue is related to the user on the 400 that is actually used by the work processes, and that user does not have the relevant rights to R3TSTDATA.
Any suggestions on how to resolve this problem will be humbly received.
Many thanks, Colin

Hi,
step 9 is wrong ;-(((
old:
9. AS4FIXFILE on R3TSTDATA with
DBLIB R3TSTDATA
CHGOWN *NO
ENDJRN *YES
STRJRN *YES
CHGFILE *NO
correct:
9. AS4FIXFILE on R3TSTDATA with
DBLIB R3TSTDATA
CHGOWN *YES    <<<<<
ENDJRN *YES
STRJRN *YES
CHGFILE *NO
it NEEDS to run with QSECOFR !!!
=> it will work !
GRTOBJAUT on all objects is rubbish only !!! no real solution!!!
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.de - http://www.4soi.de - http://www.easymarketplace.de

PO approval/Release authorisation issue

Hi,
Pl. let me know the procedure for below scenerio:
Once a PO is approved by the concerned final authority(it is in released stage) , subsequently the PO should not be editable until it is de-released by the same approval authority.
Changes should not be allowed in the PO when the PO is in released stage . If Po needs to modify then the repective PO should be derelaed first & then make a changes in it.
How to make control on it.
Regards,
CVB

Hi Dear,
Please follow the path,
IMF>Materials Management>Purchasing>Purchase Order>Release Strategy for Purchase Order>Define Release Procedure for Purchase Orders>Release Indicator
in the field "chngble"
Choose the appropriate parameters for the above given Field for the different status of the PO.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Yawar Khan

PR item release workflow issue

Hi All,
I have 1 issue with PR item workflow. We have PR itme based workflow with different agents for each line item.
The issue is when approver goes to execute the work item, all the other items are available to the approver to edit or release other items as well. We want to disable other items being available to the approver for which he is not the approver.
Thanks and Regards,
Srikar

Hi Srikar,
You can do this by using parallel processing in workflows. I am giving you the scenaio we use. We use this in invoices with multiple line items.
This scenario is implemented using a sub workflow. In the main workflow when you insert a multistep task, go to "Miscellaneous" tab to implement parallel dynamic processing. here you have to pass a multi line container element containing line item numbers. Your sub workflow will trigger one for each entry in multi line element. Do not do any changes to you PR object with in Sub Workflow just get the results of decisions taken by user back to main workflow. Like (App - for approval, Rel - For release, Rej - for rejecetion, etc). When you have all decision collected and returned to main workflow, pass the results in a multi line container element to an activity. Then based on results decide weather you want to release or reject.
Doing this if one person releases his line item, it will not effect the other workitems which have gone to other approvers.
We do agent assignment based on profit centers.
Best of luck.
Regards
Anuj Nagpal.

Segment Release version issue - ECC6 to older ver.

Hi
Our system was recently upgraded from ECC5 to ECC6 and we are facing an issue with one of the interfaces that is connected directly to the R/3 System.
This issue is realted to an outbound interface and it used to work fine when we were on ECC5. The message we are sending is a bespoke extension based on basic type DELVRY03. The segment E1EDL24 have new fields added to them in the 701 release version compared to the 620 version which was the higest available on ECC5.
I tried reducing the IDOC segment release version to 620 and 46C in the partner profile, but the message received by the thirdparty still contains the new fields which is causing an issue at their end.
I would appreciate if you could provide me some guidanace on how to appraoch this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Praveen

Hello Guy's,
We have recenlyt upgraded our quality system to ECC6.
I am also facing the same issue, As per my unnderstadning if I put segment release in WE20 then in ALE communication Layer Idoc should remove the fileds which are not intended for the given release. For example E1EDP01 is having highest release 008 for 701 release. If I set 40A in partner profile the Idoc should generate with fileds only available in 40A release i.e. version 003,but SAP is filling all thefilds which are available in701 relase.
I don;t understand why SAP has given such a functionality though it actually not filter the data at communication layer!!.
Could you please let me know did any of you really see the difference when you use segment release in WE20 when using PI as receiver? I did sevaral test for MATMAS, ORDERS found this segment release is useless.
If you have applied any workarounds(other then updating receiver system mapping) please let me know. I think is there any modification in ECC6???
Edited by: Naresh Reddy K on Jun 7, 2010 3:30 PM

PR release workflow - issue in mulitple level approval

Hi Experts,
I have developed a new workflow for PR release strategy.
Business object: BUS2105 ( Purchase Requistion )
Triggerring event: ReleaseStepCreated
Step1: Workflow started ( Releasestepcreated)
Step2: Approve PR ( Agent1)
Step2a
If yes --> Released to next level (Agent 2 )
Step2b
If No --> Rejected and notified initiator
If Yes --> Notify intiator and exit
Step3b.
If no --> based on next release code and release
group get the next level agent and go to
step2
Step4: Workflow ends.
Issue:
For single step PR release, workflow is working fine.
When PR created with multiple level release, a workflow triggers and notifies the 1st level agent, when the agent releases the PR at 1st level and saves it , workflow is not proceeds to further steps to find the next level agent.
Here i am using the FM to fetch the approvers and assigning the same for release codes.
Please guide me...

Hi
''workflow is not proceeds to further steps''... do you mean that RELEASESTEPCREATED event is not triggered for next step ?
you can check this in SWEL that whether event is getting triggered after first release.
If yes then the issue is in configuration of release strategy where for all release code you need to mark workflow parameter 1.

Purchase requisition release strategy issue

I have created release strategy in development, it was working fine with work flow. When I try to import the TR's I found that the document types in development are not in quality so I changed the document type. then I tried to create a PR and when I clicked on messages its not triggering the release strategy don't know why. In total there are 2 characteristic plant and document type.I even tried to delete the plant characteristic and tried again creating PR but still no use. let me put some screen shots comparing the development and quality. Please do help.

Thanks for the quick reply, I just checked that the over all indicator for the development and quality, I found that in development its not activated while its activated in quality will that be of any issue.
In development
In Quality

Encore CS5 Blu-Ray Preview Playback Issues / Authoring Issues

Hello,
I'm using Adobe Encore CS5 on a Mac Pro (Nehalem) 2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon w/ 8 GB Ram on Mac OS X 10.5.8.
I've recently upgraded to CS5 after having no luck using CS3 to make Blu-Ray discs. So far my experience has been a little disappointing -- it feels like they still haven't got it right. Below is a list of my issues thus far -- perhaps some of you have run into similar things:
- When importing MATROX encoded H.264 Blu-Ray files Encore CS5 hangs up. I tried this with a 54 minute encoded file. Instead I re-transcoded using the CS5 Media Encoder to the Main Concept H.264. This worked fine, although the import still hung up for several minutes before anything made it's way into the project.
- When I try opening my already existing project with a 54 minute video inside it hangs up and takes as long as 3-5 minutes to finally open successfully. This seems to happen consistently.
- After rendering motion menus and rendering them in the project the playback preview stutters. It's very steppy throughout as the video plays in the background. I even tried authoring a disc and playing it in a Blu-Ray player -- it did the same thing once authored. I've tried re-encoding the video in Media Encoder and have found the problem persists. Has anyone else experienced this with motion menus? By the way, I'm transcoding @ 25mbps (max 30mbps) in the Media Encoder.
- While trying to re-author my Blu-Ray the playback preview does not play audio on the main video when I click to play it. I've tried re-importing the asset and previewing but this does not work. I'm going to re-author the disc anyway to see if it plays right on the disc but can't understand why the preview doesn't work even if the Blu-Ray itself is fine (which it is). I should add that the first time I authored this disc the audio was fine on the main video. Preview was also fine. So I'm not sure what's happening now - I haven't changed anything in the project.
- Portions of my video on the authored video play back with slight stutter even though the source video (ProRes HQ QuickTime) does not. Is this a problem with the Main Concept H.264 encode? Should I try a 2-pass VBR transcode as another try (instead of 1-pass)? My target bit rate is 25 mbps (with a max of 30 mbps). That shouldn't be too high for a player to handle without stutter. The stutter also happens in the same place every time so it makes me think it's the encode of the file itself that's the problem.
All in all these are mainly quirks about Encore that have begun to add up and frustrate me as a user. It would be nice if these things just worked as they should. But if anyone has ideas or can think of something I might be missing in all of this that would be great to hear.
Thanks for reading.
All the best,
JD

As a follow up, I tried knocking down the number of chapters by 1/3 so there would be a total of 28 chapters instead of 41. As it turns out, the disc is still exiting the timeline and returning to the main menu at exactly the same point (which happens to be one second into a particular chapter of the timeline, just shy of 90 minutes into the timeline). It's as if Encore has split my single timeline into two timelines.
If it's of any help understanding what's happening, the entire timeline is 02;05;23;21 long. When Encore creates the Blu-ray disc, playback of the timeline ends at approximately 01;26;43;10. I then have to go to my Scenes menu and pick up where I left off as it's the only way to see the last ~39 minutes of the sequence.
As I mentioned, if I burn this as a standard definition (4.7GB) disc, it plays normally with no breaks. It's only if I burn it to a 25GB single-layer Blu-ray disc that I see the problem (using multiple Blu-ray players).
Thanks in advance for any light that can be shed on this problem.

PO Release Strategy Issue

HI,
We have created a PO release strategy workflow.All scenarios are working fine except 1 scenario.
That is,when a PO is created and rejected by a user in user decision step.The workflow will end.If the PO is changed(amount) again,the release strategy is triggered for the same user.But the workflow is not triggering.
If the release strategy is for a different user,its triggering the workflow.
I have used a fork inside which 1 parallel branch contains a wait for significantly changed event & another branch contains the user decision step,po release step & rejection reason scenario.
Can anyone tell the solution for why the workflow is not triggering for only this scenario?
Thanks,
Aparna.

Feddie wrote:>
> Kjetil, I am not clear still, could you explain me a bit clear. I have not seen any tool tip in my release tab.
Don't you see any buttons in the subscreen? The tooltip is not for the tab (title) it is for the button. I am quite sure there is a button there for cancelling the rejection, but without access to a system where this has been set up I can't check it. I just had the same issue before Christmas, where the users said the solution didn't work for the same reason mentioned here - no workflow was sent after changes where made. In fact the solution did work flawlessly as soon as they cancelled the rejection.
See also [documentation at help.sap.com|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/4c/16443c4a089537e10000000a114084/frameset.htm|ERP release ECC 6.0] for the workflow for rejected purchase orders.

Oracle Database 10g 64-bit (10.0.2.5) with Developer 6i release 2 Issue

Hi,
I am using oracle database10g (10.0.2.5) 64bit on linux Red Hat 64bit. Problem is on forms having required field as hidden or not taken in-put from user Using developer 6i release 2. Please guide me or give some advice to resolve the issue.
Basically i want upgrade developer 6i to developer 6i release 2 but when i run some forms on developer 6i release 2 return some error (enter required field ).
Thanks

Problem is on forms having required field as hidden or not taken in-put from user 1. Un-hide the field and/or make it enterable so that the user can enter a value.
or
2. Make the field optional instead of required.
or
3. Give the field a default value.
or
4. Give the field a value programmatically.
Looks like a bug in Developer 6i R1 that this was possible at all.

Edge Animate 1.01 is now released, fixing issues with DPS

Hey All,
If you've been using Edge Animate content in your DPS creations I come bearing good news! Edge Animate 1.01 is now available for download, providing a fix for a nasty iOS6 bug when deploying multiple Animate compositions in DPS. If you're using EA in conjunction with DPS I encourage you to download the update. Instructions and release notes can be found here http://helpx.adobe.com/edge-animate/release-note/release-notes-edge-an imate.html.
Thanks to all of our InDesign/DPS friends for using Edge Animate!
Sarah Hunt
Product Manager, Adobe Edge Animate

Hi,
Thank you for the post.
Can you please share your composition in which you are getting this issue. We will investigate this issue.
In the mean time, you can install the previous version of Edge animate using below link.
HTML animation | Download free Adobe Edge Animate CC trial
Regards,
Devendra

TFS Build and vNext Release Trigger issue

When the build definition is set to “True” for release – getting the error even though the Release template was linked to the Build definition.
ERROR: No release template matching the current build definition was found to create a release and deployment for.
When flag is reset to false to release - build completes and let the release be created in RM Client and select the latest build.
Another observation, was able to link the same build definition to both "Agent based" and "vNext" releases at the same time.What could be the wrong we are doing?

I had exactly the same issue (reported
here). And have reported this issue in
Microsoft Connect as well and waiting for their reply
Regards, Bharath
LinkedIn:

Send back to author issue in HCMFP with extended notification functionality

Hi,
We are using HCM Forms and Processes in our project .When the Form is sent back to author by the manager, author receives the email using extended notification functionality where the author clicks on the link provided in the notification email to open the form.Till here everything working fine, but when the author sends the form again for approval with required changes , the approver could not see the latest changes in the form. He still see the old data. Please note standard Task TS04000020: PD Form Is Edited Again by Author is used in the workflow.
We tried the same scenario, where author access the form through UWL, make necessary changes and send the form for approval. In this case,latest changes can be seen by approver without any issue.But, as per business we can not provide UWL and should use extended notification functionality only..
Please help in resolving the issue with extended notification functionality as early as possible.
Thanks,
Pavan.

Hi Viji,
Regarding your question.. here is the business requirement.
1. Author fills the HCM form , hit check and send button, so that workitem goes to approver's UWL.Author do not have portal, but performs this process from SAP GUI itself using the webdynpro link as shown below.
https:// pint01.xxx.net:8043 /sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/asr_pd_process_execute?sap-wd-configId=ZXX_PD_PROCESS_EXECUTE
2. Approver has buttons on the form to approve, reject or send back to author.
3. When author hits the "send back to author" button, the work item (task TS04000020) will be created for the author.
4. The notification email will be sent to author using the program SWN_SELSEN.The email contains a link as shown below to open, edit,check and send it again for approval.
https:// pint01.xxx.net:8043 /sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/asr_process_execute?WI_ID=000000052545
The problem here is, when the author makes changes and send the form for approval, the approver still see the old content only in the form.
Thanks,
Pavan.

Release Authority Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for