Remaining material value (precious metal) posting

Hello,
I face the following problem:
During the production process material (precious metal) is consumed. While so doing, not the whole material is used but some small quantity of the material is not consumed in the process but cannot be used any more for production. As the material is quite valuable, I want to post it on stock for later sale from stock.
My first thougt: Doing a GR from unplanned by-product.
Is this a working procedure or how can I do the inventory management for suchlike business case?
Thanks in advance for any hints or advice.
BR,
Florian

Thanks for the quick response, Meher, but I don't know if working with scrap management would solve the problem.
The key issue is that FI needs the values on the correct G/L accounts. If the remaining material - which is not suitable for production - would be posted on scrap it would not carry any value any more I guess.
The risk is that the suitable and unsuitable portions of the material are mixed up with only one material number which consequently would not allow differentiation between these two material conditions any more leading to a mix up in inventory management under circumstances and FI not being able to address the correct accounts..
I have 2 ideas: 2 separate material numbers (one being the by-product as described aboce) or working with split valuation while there are 2 batches: the one for the suitable material and the other for the unsuitable but still saleable remaining material.
What do you think of this idea?
BR,
Florian

Similar Messages

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Error that "specify a value for variable posting period (single value entry

hi
My query is running testing fine in RSECADMIN under some username..but when i try and open it using analyzer (under same username) it gives me error that "specify a value for variable posting period (single value entry, mandatry)" it does'nt even asks to enter variable values and gives this error message.
However the same query appears to be working fine under different username.
plz advise.

Hi Abhinav,
Just do one thing compare the Roles of two different users for which Query is getting executed and not.
Check the Object S_RFC.
Compare the Objects detail for Both the Users.
Please Assign points if useful.
Regards,
Rajdeep.

How to block an invoice if the value of a post is zero?

Hello,
In the rules of copy we use the field " Pricing type " with the value " C = Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others ".
The order is complete and the price of the post is not equal to zero.
During the invoicing the system makes a new search for the prices in the tables of conditions.
If the condition does not exist in the date of invoice the post takes the zero value.
How to block an invoice if the value of a post is zero?
There is no incompleteness procedure for the invoice.
The value of the post is the result of several conditions and we cannot make them obligatory.
Who already has to meet this problem with the recalcul of the price in the invoicing?
Best regards
Frédéric Blaise
e-Kenz S.A.
Luxembourg

Hi,
It is not the total invoice which is equal to zero but only one post.
As I explained it at first the problem is the following one:
In the rules of copy we use the field " Pricing type " with the value " C = Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others ".
he order is complete and the price of the post is not equal to zero.
+During the invoicing the system makes a new search for the prices in the tables of conditions.
If the condition does not exist in the date of invoice the post takes the zero value.
I look for a solution to block the creation of the invoice if a post only is equal to zero after the updating of the prices.
Thanks
Frédéric

How to change value date from posting date to net due date

Hi Gurus,
My client wants to change value date from posting date to net due date. currently posting date is considered as value date but in future client wants to change value date to net due date of documents.
1. what configurations need to be maintained to change value date from posting date to net due date.
2. Will these changes effect automatic payment run.
Thanks and Regards,
Suresh

Hi Suresh,
In Future
While posting the documents you can mention the value date as due date of the documents.
For already posted documents
You can change the value date to net due date.
If the value date is display mode i.e. if you are not able to change the value date in FB02 (Document Change Mode), use OB32 transaction and make value date field as eidtable (BSEG-VALUT).
In OB32 transaction enter all the required fields like Account type, transaction type, company code and finally activate the Field can be changed check box.
But not sure, whether we can change the value date to previous date or not?
This would help you..
Regards,
Praisty
Edited by: Praisty on Jul 28, 2009 9:56 AM

Dist. of Header Condition based on the material Value

Hi All,
I have one query regarding the header Condition.i have selected the Calculation type as B - fixed amount (mandatory) for a particular Condition type and also selected the header and Item condition indicator.Now if the material have more than one line item then the system distributes this condition based on the quantities in PO.
My client requirement is that they want to have a header condition as we are using now. But they want to distribute this header condition according to the material values for each line items in a PO. please Mention that this condition is a fixed value (mandatory).
So, how can we make a Fixed Value (Calculation type) for a header condition to be distributed among the line items based on the base Value?
Please revert back asap.
Sure, points will be awarded for the same.

as explained earlier ,
system is distributes the header amount on the basic of value calculated by Basic X qty
e.g.
header value =100
two line item
1 is with Rs 4/- and qty is 10
2 is with Rs 10/- and qty is 15
so distribution is
Rs 21.05/- for 1st item
and
Rs 78.94/- for 2ed item
regards,
sujit

FA-retirement-Asset value date and posting date are not in same fisc year

Hello,
I would like to post retirement in the new fiscal year but with asset value date in the previous year so that NBV is calculated correctly. It is not possible neither in ABAON nor in ABAVN with any transaction type.
I always get message 'Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year'.
Is there any way how to handle this?
Thank you,
Jan

Hi,
I have tried this but the settings of our Depr keys works in the way. That if you use asset value date in the new month it will calculate depreciation for the whole month.
This means if I retire with asset value date 31.12.2008 - NBV will be calculated as at 31.12.2008.
If I retire with asset value date 1.1.2008 - NBV will be calculated as at 31.1.2009.
Thank you anyway!

Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year

Hi,
Our business user has created an asset under an incorrect asset class, which he is trying to transfer to a new asset whcih was created under correct asset class. However system is restricting user with the error message "Asset value date and posting date are not in same fiscal year". Can you please advise me how we can proceed further with this error.
Regards,
Asam.

Hi,
To transfer one asset to another asset within a company code can be done through ABUMN only.
While doing this transfer you have enter the document date, posting date, and value date for the transaction, but all these dates should be in same fiscal year only.
In your case you must have been entered the dates for asset value date and posting date , and these two dates are in diff financial years.
Please make sure that both the dates are in same FY.
Hope this will fix your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu

How to view the Material Value Involved in the WIP Closing Balance Report

We are able to see the Itemwise WIP Closing Value using KKAQ.
We have one requirement that to know the Material Value & Quantity Involved in the WIP Closing Balance Summary.
How to fetch the information for Material Value , Process Value With Quantity on Itemwise from WIP Closing Balance.?
Thanks in Advance
Regards
K.Natarajan

Dear Premkumar,
Thankx for your reply. But when we execute the T-Code KKBC_PKO for an Item, It is giving an error like "No product cost collector exist for material/plan/prod.process <Matl.COde>"
How to see this report.
Regards
K.Natarajan

Service cost to be included into Material value.

Dear Expert,
1. Purchase order has been created for "XXX" material - Value of 1000 - Quantity 10, GRN & Invoice has been booked.
Now my material valuation price is 1000 * 10 = 10000
2. Service PO has been raised to make alteration in same "XXX" material, the cost incurred has to be booked for that particular Material "XXX" only.
Two vendors are different.
Kindly advise
Regards,
Mohan

Hi,
As your initial material is XXX with amount 1000 now your doing the alteration on this if you want to keep the same material code, follow the subcontract process as said by shiva, create subcontract PO for XXX add the same materail in BOM componenet , do the complete cycle add the alteration charges in the PO then when you will make the GR agaianst subcontract PO the new valuation will be
1000 + alteration chrages for each.
regards,
zafar

Material value report (Scrap)

Hi All,
Pls let me know std reports available in SAP of material valuation,like value of receipts,Issues and Issue to scrap.
my basic requirement to know the scrap value of perticular material which is issued to Scrap
Regards
Raj

You can Use MB5B.
Give the material number and period of interest and execute. You will get the current stock value of the material, value of receipts and value of issues.
But if you want to know the values of certain transactions only (value of material for the particular transaction when it is scrapped using mov type 551, 553, 555, then develop custom reports using the accounting documents generated in that transaction.
Or write a query using SQVI

Excise duty for some line item of material document is not posted

Dear CIN Exerts,
In my Scenario user is Posting Excise invoice for every GR (105) by J1IEX to generate Excise invoice.
In some Past cases, if there are more then one line item in a GR then Excise value for some material is not showing (May be that time user not Did J1ID (Excise rate maintenance ).
Now the problem is that we wants to post excise Duty for those material WRT material document for whom it was not posted.
Please let me know that how can we do so (excise posting against Material document) so that it get reflected (for those line items for which Excise deuty is not posted) in MIGO > Document Display> Excise items tab .
Regards,
Ashutosh

Excise posting is not recommended by sap for movements 103 or 105.
Refer or search for SAP notes with subject CIN Limited functionalities.

Material stock to be posted to restricted stock( urgent please)

Hi genius,
This is below my scenario, Please let me the solution .
1. Material to be received thro GR ( MIGO ) and which has to be posted to unrestricted stock.
2. Material will be reserved by the users as on when required thro MB21 T.Code.
3. Reservation does not allow the reservation qty over the quantity available present in unrestricted stock.
4. New Reservation should not allow to create more than available qty. which is taken into the account of already reserved.
5. Consumption should be blocked on actual objective.
6. Plant control/Indented items should be put to restriction on issuance only to indented department.
7.Less impact on account inventory qty and value reconciliation.
Please find anyother solution , Let me know, I am eagarly waiting for your valuable reply,
Regards
Jeya

Hi
1. Through movement type 101, stock will be posted as unrestricted stock.
2. Reservation is created via MB21 only
3 You are defeating the logic of reservation if in you scenario reservation should not exceed the quantity available in stock. If you are running MRP, it will take the reservation into a/c and if any deficit in stock in there it will draw an PR for the same.
4 Same answer as point 3
5 You can restrict consumption against reservation.
6 You can control this thru reservation.
7 Its matter od discipline.

Material value which is MAP will be GR for free of chaged

Hi,
I have one material with value stock and qty stock for inventory and using MAP .
now current inventory qty
10 ea current MVP is 1000 US$
what if the material will be Good Receipt as Free of charge ?
my question, do i have to suggest 501 with inventory value ?
or do i have to suggest 511 without inventory value ?
anyway both way, qty of material will be increased and effect to MVP
so which way is best guide or answer to customer?

501- this is without PO and free goods will go to inventory and MAP will decrease. Stock value will remain same. Here you will not have a reference of how the quantity is received.
511- If you use this the free goods will add to the inventory and MAP will decrease, stock value will remain same.Here you will have a reference to PO.
So you can suggest to the customer to have reference and use 511.

Remaining material value (precious metal) posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for