Remittance for check to vendor with multiple invoices paid

SBO 2007A, PL15
If I print a vendor check to pay 10 or more invoices, the remittance portion prints 9 invoices on the stub and then prints the remainder of the invoices on the next check in the check run. How can I make the stub stop at 9?
Edited by: Rui Pereira on Jan 27, 2009 3:30 PM

Hi ,
It looks like print setup .
1.Go to administration >> System intialisation >> Print preference >> Documents >>Checks for payment
>> Overflow to Blank paper
2. It could be application error .
Suggestion :(Not necessary)
Please upgrade your patch level . You are in patch 15 and right now I believe is 45
Thank you
Bishal

Similar Messages

How to create sales return with multiple invoices

Hi ,
I am creating a sales order return with reference of billing document using FM SD_SALESDOCUMENT_CREATE, if i give one Billing document as a reference document it is creating document perfectly.
But my Requirement is to create one Return sales order with multiple invoices.
I tried to pass reference document no's in Item level , but it take first reference document number only , for that reference document only return is creating.
Can you any one help me how to create this.
Thanks in advance
Swapna.

Hello Venkat,
As I know it is not possible to create a single return order for multiple invoices in the background.
It is possible in the foreground by following the below steps.
1) Goto VA01 --> enter the Sales order type and Sales area.
2) Press F8 or click on create with reference, provide the first invoice.
3) Now the main screen would appear, displaying line items from Invoice1.
4) Without going back, again goto path, Sales document -> Create with reference
5) Enter second invoice2. and the items from invoice2 will also appear in the Sales order line item.
------ Enter as many number of invoices by repeating the above step--------------------
6) Press save, so one sales order is created for multiple invoices.
Regards,
Thanga

[Non IE Regression] Support for full screen mode with multiple monitors

This seems to be a regression with Flash Player v11.2.202.x (for all other browsers).
With Internet Explorer it is still working.
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/890/cpsid_89050.html
== Support for full screen mode with multiple monitors ==
Full screen content will remain in full-screen on secondary monitors, allowing users to watch full-screen content while working on another display.
Tested on Windows 7 x64 SP1 with:
- Internet Explorer 9
- Firefox Release, Beta, Aurora, Nightly
- Opera 12 build 1116
In bugbase.adobe.com I cannot choose v11.2.x

Please vote for it If you have the same problem:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3016912
Thanks

User exit after selecting vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi,
the requirement is that a pop-up should appear after the user selects a vendor with multiple bank accounts, in transaction MIRO, FB60, F-43 and a few other transactions.
I was thinking of a user exit. Honestly, I wonder if this is technically possible ?
Any hints welcome,
regards,
Rolf
Message was edited by:
Rolf Schorpion

HI
I believe u have to change the std programs to do that.
Max

Payment proposal for vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi there,
I'm currently dealing with payment proposals (F110) with two conditions:
1): several documents with different currencies are attached in the same payment run (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
2): several banks are defined for that vendor in the master data. We assume that that three banks are defined in the master records (one in GBP, one in USD and one in EUR)
We started developing a user exit to find a way to have the correct bank selected in depending on the document currency; it worked but only for one document-->payment is done to the right bank account even if the vendor has different bank accounts. Whenever several documents for the same vendor are included into the payment proposal, only one bank is selected out of our program, corresponding to the first document.
I wonder if there is a way for setting up a bank selection in another way.
NB: the partner bank type solution within the document is not an option as the sites (which are creating the PO) don't know about bank details and therefore don't indicate anything.
Thanks for reply!
regards,
FX

When you enter bank details in master, update field "Partner bank type" LFBK-BVTYP with free form value, may be currency is good choice.
During invoice entry, this field is available for update, update which bank to be used for payment of this invoice. You may build logic to populate this field, like substitution to populate currency in this field during invoice posting.
During payment, system checks value in field Partner bank type in invoice and selects corresponding bank.
Hope this helps.

Lockbox applied check with multiple invoices but no clearing

Hello experts.
I have an odd issue with some items that are posting through FLB2.
We have a check that is applied to 3 separate invoices. The invoices are valid and show as "document found" in the FLB2 reports. The items in the batch in the FLB1 (post processing procedure) show as "APPLIED". If you look at the documents for the "APPLIED" item, none of the invoices for this check were cleared and the payment advice remains open. If you did not manually look at the "APPLIED" item, you would not know the invoices were not cleared. Has anyone had the same problem? We are executing FLB2 with the "Enhanced invoice check" NOT checked. That box is clear. This should allow multiple invoices to clear for the one check? The MICR number is not found, so isn't the next step in clearing to match the invoices on the BAI2 file and then clear if there is a match?
Any advice or assistance on how to resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi,
This sounds wierd. Well, I would recommend to check "Enhanced invoice check" option while running FLB2. This will prevent the incorrect cash application to a different customer based on incorrect invoice number. For eg. In LBX file, If customer X sends invoice # belonging to a customer Y by mistake, then lockbox program looks at the document # first, assumes that payment belongs to customer Y(coz of invoice #), and applies it accordingly.
So, it's always better to check the above option. Well, there are few surprises despite selecting the above option in some cases, but I would say this will jack up your hit rate in cash appln for right customer.
Thanks,
Nirav

Vendor with multiple bank details....paid to the 1st bank account while inv

Hello Experts,
We have a vendor with two bank accounts in the vendor master. Now while making the payment, I mean, which account will the money goes? at the time of F110 , we paid to the 1st bank account in the vendor master..
Settings in vendor master:
I 'name' the bank accounts in the vendor master, in the field Bank Type. While posting through MIRO, insert this code into the line item 'Patner bank' and the payment program will pick up the bank account accordingly BUT If I don't add this information to the Patner bank account, than always the first bank account will be picked up..
I want that even if don't add any info in partner bank in the line item, at the time of F110 , it should paiy to the 2nd bank account in the vendor master..
This is a very stupid requiremnt but our users wants like this only.
Kindly show me some light in this dark tunnel...please.
regards,
nupur

Hi Nupur,
In vendor master data under 3rd tab where we record all bank details of the vendor left hand side you will find one column 'C' .i.e., Collection authorisation......kindly check this option for your second bank to which you want to make the payment.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,

VENDOR With Multiple Location

Dear Experts
we r having Single Company Code & Multiple Plant , and our vendor Having Multiple Location so through
Company Code i want to Create only one Vendor but whenever order will be placed then Purchase order should Contain different Address And For FI Point Single Account Should be mentained.
Or what would be the Best Pratices is there...
Rgds
Pankaj Agarwal

hi,
You can do one thing...Do create the One time vendor in the VMR with the One time vendor account group defined in it...
So that when you create the PO, the details you will be able to enter your self at every time and account group will also be same...
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Handling Material Variance for 3rd Part PO with No Invoice

How can material variances be handled for 3rd party purchase orders with no invoice?

Hi Annie,
if the configuration doesn't help you enough, you would have to add some custom logic after the invoice has been created.
Technically speaking, I believe there exists a business add-in (BAdI) where you could enter a piece of code which would after the invoice creation check the GR and block it if appropriate. Another implementation option would be a mini-workflow - there you would have a step which checks the GR existence and blocks the invoice.
Hope this helps, I suggest talking to your local abap consultant for more details,
-Mikko

3-Way Match with Multiple Invoices

This may be a basic Oracle iProcurement functionality question, but i have been unable to get a good answer. Any information will be greatly appreciated.
I am currently using Oracle 11i iProcurement.
The problem I am having is I am unable to perform a 3-way Match in the system on purchase orders that will use multiple invoices. Our vendors require a tiered payment structure (i.e. 50% due up front before shipment, 30% due when item has reached shipment destination, and 10% due after our engineers have inspected the shipment).
We have been currently using a 2-way match for all of our purchase orders because when we apply the first invoice against the PO (50%), the PO will automatically close before we can receipt the goods against the purchase order.
Our Invoice Receipt Close % Tolerance and Invoice Close % Tolerance are set at 0%.
Our goal is to receipt the first 50% against the purchase order, have the PO remain open, and receipt the goods in Oracle after the 2nd or 3rd invoice application against the PO.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: user13053863 on Apr 28, 2010 2:44 PM

Hmm, an interesting situation. What are the quantities on your purchase orders? Are they almost always a quantity of 1? Payables should only close a purchase order when quantity billed and quantity received is GT or equal to the quantity ordered. So if you order a quantity of 10, you could match for quantity 5 on the first invoice, quantity 3 for the second invoice, and quantity 2 for the final invoice. But since you don't receive the quantity until the 3rd invoice, you cannot match on receipts, so that would be a problem.
Maybe you need to approach this from a different angle? Maybe you should look at the prepayments ability in Payables. Typically Prepayments will be charged to a Prepayment Account (asset). Say you have a purchase order for $10,000. You prepay $5,000 up front, so basically Debit Prepayment 5,000 and Credit Cash 5,000. Same for the next prepayment level - $3,000. Then you get the ordered material received. So you want to do an invoice for $10,000. Match the invoice to the purchase order. Apply the prepayments to the purchase order. Thus you get an entry something like Debit Inventory $10,000, Credit Prepayments $8,000, and Credit Cash $2,000.
From an accounting perspecitive, you don't show the prepayments in inventory until received, but do show a prepayment asset. Which is reflecting what you really are doing I think.
I have never worked for anyone who has had to do prepayments, but this is an area that you may wish to investigate as a possible solution for your situation. Good luck.
John Dickey

Multiple downpayment should be clear with multiple invoices Through APP

Dear Friends,
My client wnats settle the payments through APP.
For this we have maintain the APP setting in FBZP.
We have maintain the spacial indicator In FBZP for down payments.
But my quistion is System is unable to settle the multiple down paymemts agianst multiple invoices.
If one down down payment against one invoices. systes is able to clear the down payment against one invoices.
But prbloem with Multiple scenarios.
Syste is giving the Errro Message Is:
None of the payment method can be used for thes item..
Please give me the valuble inputs.
Regards,
Bramha

Hi friend,
Sorry this is not a correct requiremnt
Regards,
Bramha

User exit for checking the vendor emailid in me22n or me21n

hi all,
     can anybody suggest me a user exit for checking the email id of the vendor in me21n or me22n or me29n.
   plz suggest me a solution its urgent.

hi yaan,
       i checked with the user exit that u suggested me, it is getting triggered, i am able to check whether the vendor email id is present or not, but this is happening all the time that is even when the user dont want to send a email to the vendor i.e. he just wants to print the purchase order, even at that time this user exit is getting triggered and giving a message that the vendor email id is not maintained.
the reson why this is happening is there is no import parameter to this user exit which gives the "medium of data transfer" the user has entered. if i get this parameter visible inside the user exit, then i can check this parameter inside the user exit and do the required operation.   i checked up with all the user exits in "me" package and even the other related packages but none of them is getting triggered,
do u know a user exit or badi which imports this parameter and also gets triggered at the time of creation of purchase order.
plz give me a solution.
regards,
santosh.

SO creation for one internal item with multiple customer code

Hello,
We want to create sales order for one internal product for one customer with multiple customer product code.
SAP allows only one to one relation in customer info record. Is there any work around for having multiple customer product code for our single internal product code in single sales order.
Regards,
Balu J Karbhari

Hello,
It is not possible. Please check OSS note 626931.
One alternative approach might be to trying to use the material determination functionality. Please try the below steps and check if it works for you.
T Code VD51: Create CMIR for Customer & Material
T. Code VB11: Maintain material determination for all required materials to point to the Material which has the CMIR.
T Code OVRQ: Substitution reasons. Make the configuration to print Original material . Check the column ENTRY, so on output the original material will be printed.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sai

User exit or a badi for checking the vendor email id in me22n on me29n

hi all,
can anybody suggest me a user exit or a badi for checking the email id of the vendor in me21n or me22n or me29n.
i.e. a user exit or a BADI which gets hit either at the time of creation or release of a purchase order.
plz suggest me a solution its urgent.
regards,
santosh

Hi Santosh,
Have you looked BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST or user exits EXIT_SAPMM06E_016 / EXIT_SAPMM06E_017?
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto
Please reward points if helpful.

Dynamic routing for a Business Service with multiple operations

I have two business services with multiple operations. Business service A (bsA) has operations OpA1 and OpA2. Business service B (bsB) has operations OpB1 and OpB2.
Depending on incoming Proxy message and operation, I have to do one of the following
1. If someValue = A and operation= Op1 then invoke operation opA1 of bsA
2. If someValue = B and operation= Op1 then invoke operation opB1 of bsB
3. If someValue = C and operation= Op1 then invoke operation opA1 of bsA AND* operation opB1 of bsB and return aggregate data of both invocations
1. If someValue = A and operation= Op2 then invoke operation opA2 of bsA
2. If someValue = B and operation= Op2 then invoke operation opB2 of bsB
3. If someValue = C and operation= Op2 then invoke operation opA2 of bsA AND* operation opB2 of bsB and return aggregate data of both invocations
Using a dynamic route node or dynamic routing options, I am able to achieve cases 1, 2, 4, and 5.
But for cases 3 & 6, I can not use a route node. When I use a Service call out instead, then I am forced to create a Operational branch but that does not seem like the best design since for every new operation added to the business services, I have to add a new branch to the Operational branch and redo all the functionality for that branch.
Basically, I am looking to achieve the functionality of the Route node ( no need to specify the operation ).
Any thoughts/ideas on what the best design would be?
thanks

For cases 3 & 6, why don't you route to another proxy service where you can simple do two service callouts, merge output data somehow and return them to the first proxy?
If you look for "special route feature", that could possibly call two services for a single message, I'm afraid you won't succeed.

Remittance for check to vendor with multiple invoices paid

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for