Remoting with CFC

Question

I'm using Flash remoting to send usage statistics from a
movie up to a
coldfusion component for processing and storage. System works
great -- at
least the individual calls are working -- but when I try to
execute all these
calls multiple times through the movie, it never gets past
two remote calls
before throwing an "Error Opening URL" error referencing my
flashservices
gateway:
http://<host>/flashservices/gateway&CFID=1052&CFTOKEN=c8c5587a8f62a442-E197BB47-B213-8FBA- 0924E5F0BF114A00;jsessionid=2a30fe0e960f21172524?CFID=1052
I've tried changing names of the instance each time I call a
new one -- but
that doesn't seem to matter. I'm starting to suspect this is
a ColdFusion error --
Anybody have any idea what I'm talking about?
I've included the connection code and the general examples of
the method calls
I'm using...
import mx.remoting.*;
import mx.rpc.*;
import mx.services.Log;
// connection script
var trackingService:Service = new
Service("
http://<host>/flashservices/gateway",
null, "<cfc>", null, null);
// open user tracking tracking session (called once when
movie is opened)
var sessionTrax:PendingCall =
trackingService.discStart({cf_macID:xxx,
cf_projectID:xxx, cf_clientID:xxx });
// log user activity (needs to be called numerous times on
any button click,
regardless of amount of clicks)
var clickTrax:PendingCall =
trackingService.contentClick({cf_macID:xxx,
cf_projectID:xxx, cf_clientID:xxx, cf_content:xxx,
cf_contentName:xxx,
cf_size:xxx });
// close user tracking session (called once)
var sessionTrax:PendingCall =
trackingService.discEnd({cf_macID:xxx,
cf_projectID:xxx, cf_clientID:xxx });
Any help would be appreciated...

Answer 1

certainly that type of bottleneck is possible. the processes
I'm running are not terribly complex so I can't imagine they are
stacking up that much, but I'll certainly look into it.
I'm beginning to think more and more I'm missing an obvious
ColdFusion server setting. Others have suggested modifying the
number of simultaneous connections as a possibility. I modified
this and didn't appear to be any difference.