Remove object

Hello:
I have an image where I want to remove an object.  I'm using CS6 version.  The object is a tractor.
I've tried to use the Content Aware tool and my result turned out to be a bush.  I've also tried the spot healing brush and eraser tool.  The result was the same.
Can someone give me a hand on removing this object?  Right now, I'm at a loss as to what to do.
You can find the image here http://www.fullfocuscp.com/atlanta-national-2.jpg.
Thank you in advance for the help.

I'd do this with careful use of the clone tool. Just clone small areas at a time, and work to blend the results in.
Here's a hastily-done rough example:

Similar Messages

  • Not appear add/remove object merged

    Hi,
    I have a web intelligence report with a merged, but the option does not appear add/remove object in the merged, however, supposed that this function would be enabled on the version you just updated, as mentioned in this link:
    https://scn.sap.com/community/businessobjects-web-intelligence/blog/2013/03/10/what-is-new-with-web-intelligence-bi-41-part-2-core-capabilities
    upgrade
    BI4.1 SP1 Patch7
    regards

    Maybe something here will help?
    [[Removing the Search Helper Extension and Bing Bar]]

  • About remove object

    Hi ,my name Nak
    I want to remove Object 3D from the scene.
    But shadow and physics is don't remove.

    Please help me

  • List implementation where remove(Object) is fast?

    Does anyone know of an implementation of the java.util.List interface where the the method boolean remove(Object o) is much faster than traversing through the list until it finds the right one? Perhaps something that takes advantage of the hash code of the object being removed?
    Thanks

    So you want a List that acts like a Map?
    Couldn't you just use a Map?
    Explain your problem domain better and we shall help
    you see the light.
    Well no - I would simply like a List that acts like a List, and whose remove(Object) method is faster than just scanning through each element.
    I only mentioned use of the hash code as one way this could be implemented. To expand on that: Currently the LinkedList class internally maintains a list of Entry objects. Each of these objects has a reference to the previous and next Entry and the 'current' list element object. The problem is that the remove(Object) method has to go through each Entry one by one, searching for a list element that equals the object to be removed. To fix this problem the list implementation could also maintain a HashMap whose 'keys' are the list elements and whose 'values' are a (secondary) list of Entry objects associated with that key. Now the remove(Object) method could use the object to be removed to look up the 'list of associated Entry objects'. The first Entry in this (secondary) list is the one that needs to be removed.
    But perhaps it's best if I describe the overlying problem: I want to write a program that randomly generates integers at the rate of about 10 per second. For each integer the program should calculate how many times in the past hour that number has been generated. What's the fastest way to calculate this?

  • How to remove objects

    PLEASE How to remove objects from sidebar?
    Can draw folders and files etc in sidebar, but not remove the representation n sidebar. Pulled out objects returns back immediately.
    ~~~~~ k.

    You should be able to drag it off and "Poof" it. Have you released your mouse button?
    If it's one of the standard items in Sidebar you might go to Finder > Preferences > Sidebar > and uncheck them.
    -mj

  • Error removing object from cache with write behind

    We have a cache with a DB for a backing store. The cache has a write-behind delay of about 10 seconds.
    We see an error when we:
    - Write new object to the cache
    - Remove object from cache before it gets written to cachestore (because we're still within the 10 secs and the object has not made it to the db yet).
    At first i was thinking "coherence should know if the object is in the db or not, and do the right thing", but i guess that's not the case?

    Hi Ron,
    The configuration for <local-scheme> allows you to add a cache store but you cannot use write-behind, only write-through.
    Presumably you do not want the data to be shared by the different WLS nodes, i.e. if one node puts data in the cache and that is eventually written to a RAC node, that data cannot be seen in the cache by other WLS nodes. Or do you want all the WLS nodes to share the data but just write it to different RAC nodes?
    If you use a local-scheme then the data will only be local to that WLS node and not shared.
    I can think of a possible way to do what you want but it depends on the answer to the above question.
    JK

  • Dynamically removing objects

    Hi all,
    I am trying to remove objects at run time using a delete button but I keep getting an error saying
    "no capability to write children". I have set the detach() capability on the Branch Group for adding the object and have set all the relevant capabilities(as far as i can see).
    I can add objects at run time to the scene but cant figure out why I keep getting this error.??
    Any help would be gratefully accepted.
    Cheers,
    Dave

    I'll assume you have something similar to this:
    Group g
    |-----> Other stuff
    \-----> BranchGroup bg
    g must have the capability Group.ALLOW_CHILDREN_WRITE set. bg must have the capability BranchGroup.ALLOW_DETACH set.
    Then, you remove bg like this:
    g.removeChild(bg);

  • Collection: add(E), remove(Object)

    Hello, all!
    First of all, I guess very strange see interface collection with
    add(E) and remove(Object)... Why is there such collision?
    LinkedList<String> list = new LinkedList<String>();
    Object o = null;
    list.remove(o);NetBeans shows a warning for the last line: Expected type String, actual type Object.
    Eclipse and java compiler do not point to it. So how can I understand this? Netbeans fixed remove(Object) to remove(E)?
    Can you please help to understand the collision?

    mfratto wrote:
    The only warning I get in netbeans is to assign the return value, a boolean, to a new variable.I use netbeans 6.7. Probably, You use another version of netbeans from me, so you do not get the same warning.
    [see screenshort of the netbeans warning|http://i055.radikal.ru/0907/b2/6203e7e22d79.jpg]
    But what that warning is saying is that you declared the LinkedList to contain String objects, but you are trying to remove an Object (which is a parent of String). You can do that, it's just weird to do so. Why wouldn't you just pass a object, a String in this case, of the same type back into list.remove()?
    Edited by: mfratto on Jul 23, 2009 5:42 PMwithout sense, I just would like to understand netbeans behavior and "collision" of add(E) and remove(Object) methods.
    Edited by: aeuo on Jul 23, 2009 8:47 PM the screenshort was changed to more illustrative one

  • LinkedList.remove(Object) O(1) vs O(n)

    The LinkedList class documentation says the following:
    "All of the operations perform as could be expected for a doubly-linked list. Operations that index into the list will traverse the list from the beginning or the end, whichever is closer to the specified index."
    Typically one expects the remove operation from a linkedlist to be O(1). (for example [here on wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_list] )
    This is in theory true however typically in the implementation of a LinkedList internally nodes (or Entry<E> in the case of the java implementation) are made that are wrappers around the actual objects inserted in the list. These nodes also contain the references to the next and previous nodes.
    These nodes can be removed from the linked list in O(1). However if you want to remove an a object from the list, you need to map it to the node to be removed. In the java implementation they simply search for the node in O(n). (It could be done without searching but this would require some mapping which requires more memory.)
    The java implementation can be seen here:
        public boolean remove(Object o) {
            if (o==null) {
                for (Entry<E> e = header.next; e != header; e = e.next) {
                    if (e.element==null) {
                        remove(e);
                        return true;
            } else {
                for (Entry<E> e = header.next; e != header; e = e.next) {
                    if (o.equals(e.element)) {
                        remove(e);
                        return true;
            return false;
        }It seems to be a common misconception that this method runs in O(1) while it actually runs in O(n). For example [here in this cheat sheet|http://www.coderfriendly.com/2009/05/23/java-collections-cheatsheet-v2/] and [in this book|http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596527754/]. I think quite a lot of people think this methode runs in O(1). I think it should be made explicitly clear in the documentation of the class and the method that it runs in O(n).
    On a side note: the remove() operation from the LinkedList iterator does perform in O(1).

    I agree. It's not at all clear what the objection here is.
    To add to Jeff's answer: the remove operation on the LinkedListIterator is O(1) because you don't have to search for the node to unlink - the iterator already has a pointer to it.
    I tend to think of two different operations:
    - unlink - an operation specific to a linked datastructure which removes a given node from the datastructure and completes in O(1)
    - remove - an operation which searches for a given object in the data structure and then removes the node containing that object (using the unlink operation in the case of a linked datastructure). The performance of this depends on the performance of the search and unlink operations. In an unsorted linked list (e.g. the Java LinkedList) the search operation is O(n). So this operation is O(n).

  • ConcurrentLinkedQueue remove(Object o) always fails in ActionListener?

    Hi,
    I tried to write a tiny program where if I click a button, the right String is removed from a ConcurrentLinkedQueue.
    However, it doesn't work at all. To troubleshoot, I tried other ConcurrentLinkedQueue methods such as add(), offer(), remove(void). They all work fine except remove(Object o).
    According to doc, remove(Object o) works if o.equals(e). So I also overwrote equals(Object o). It still doesn't work.
    This is a pesudo code:
    class a extends JFrame
    public ConcurrentLinkedQueue<String> queue;
    public JTextField text;
    public JButton button;
    public ActionListener removeAction=new ActionListener()
    public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
    //Supposing it's string "StringA" in the text box GUI.
    queue.remove(text.getText());
    //false. Can't remove String "StringA" from queue.
    public a()
    queue.add("StringA");
    queue.add("StringB");
    queue.add("StringC");
    add(text);
    add(button);
    button.addActionListener(removeAction);
    Can anyone help me with it?

    809670 wrote:
    According to doc, remove(Object o) works if o.equals(e). So I also overwrote equals(Object o). It still doesn't work.Overrode, not overwrote.
    Possibilities:
    1) There's a huge glaring bug in a significant public method that's been in general use for several years and you're the first one to find it.
    2) There's a huge glaring bug in a significant public method that's been in general use for several years and others have found it before, but nobody bothered to fix it.
    3) There's something wrong with your equals method.
    4) There's something wrong with the code where you call remove.
    5) There's something wrong with how you're determining that the object has not been removed.

  • How to remove objects from pics using LR...

    I am not a professional photographer and I do not have a whole lot of photo editing knowledge. I started out several years ago using Photoshop elements 5 and eventually learned how to do several things like moving objects around or removing them from a photo, or moving someone's face into a different picture if their eyes were closed and lots of nice editing features. I loved it and still love it. My laptop was getting really old and slow so I just recently purchased a new computer which has windows 8 on it. I loaded my photoshop elements and cannot get it to open or work properly and am wondering if it's because of the windows 8 operating system. So I then decided to purchase a new photo editing software. I decided (quickly.. too quickly) to purchase adobe lightroom just because it had very good reviews online. Now I have several pictures that need to be edited for Christmas and I cannot find any "lasso tool" or any thing similar right now.. I was so used to using the layers and features from the PE and now my heart is broken because I feel so lost and maybe broke at the same time!! This program is soooo different than what I was used to using but I don't even know if I can do the same things with it. EXAMPLE: there is an air conditioner unit in one of the photos I've taken and I was planning on removing it from the picture. Also I was aiming on moving a face over from another picture because of some closed eyes.. Someone please tell me, is this program capable of doing these things or can I only play with the lighting in this? Will I have to spend more of my $$ to get another Photoshop elements to get the features I use?

    These tasks are tasks for Photoshop or Photoshop Elements, not for Lightroom, which is more an image data base.

  • How can we know the affected reports when i remove object from universe

    Hi All,
    If i remove any objects from the universe.
    How can i know the list of affected reports.

    Thanks for your update.
    It shows what are all the reports has been created  by using that particular universe.
    But my question was, if i remove any object from the universe, Then what are all the reports affected(We may not use that deleted object in all the reports)

  • Lightroom 4  removing objects in photo

    I want to get Lightroom 4 and I think I read somewhere that instead of having to erase and clone unwanted objects in a photo, one could click on object and remove it and the computer would fill in the background to what it should have been. Ex: photo of a church with light pole in front. click on pole, it disappears and what is behind the pole is pictured without the pole in front. I saw this a few months ago when a friend sent me the info. Cost of software then was about $199. Now I cannot find that feature listed and also the price is much cheaper so not sure which software. Anyone know which product has this feature?

    I believe you are looking for "content aware fill" or "content aware remove" in Photoshop CS6.  Look at the promo video for PS CS6.  Lightroom's spot healing tool works pretty much like the healing brush tool in PS.

  • Problem removing Objects from the stage in Flash CS4 (AS3.0)

    I have a problem with this code:
    this.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, vanish);
    function vanish(event:Event):void{
         if(character_mc.hitTestObject(vanish_mc)){
              vanish_mc.parent.removeChild(vanish_mc);
    There are two overlapping objects on my stage: character_mc and vanish_mc.
    As soon as i start the scene[Ctrl+Enter] vanish_mc is VISUALLY removed. But the code still sees a collision somehow. How can i Entirely remove the object vanish_mc?
    Thank you for help and advice.

    Ah I think the problem is what my problem not which I proposed, my bad I was trying to keep it simple.
    the remove code in my problem actually looks like this:
    if(character_mc.hitTestObject(this["dollar_mc_"+String(i)])){
         removeChild(this["dollar_mc_"+String(i)]);
    I wanted it to be that way so I could add infinite "dollar_mc_" ' s without writing myself to death with code and or getting confused.
    Imagine it like a game where a character it picking up dollars, which would disappear once they intersect.
    And that exactly is what gives me that argument.
    Do you know a way i could write this code, or do you suggest to leave it that way...because it does run and work im just getting this argument while debugging.
    Thank you for all the help~

  • Removing objects from photo

    I am trialling photosup elements before deciding to buy it or not.  Not sure if there is a difference in the trial version compared to the purchased version. I am trying to remove an unwanted object from a picture by highlighting the unwanted object,  then I go to edit and then fill. However there is no option for "content aware" under the fill option as shown in the tutorial.  As a result, if I choose any of the options under the fill tab,  it will only remove the object and leave a "blank spot" on the picture.  Have I missed some steps here please?  Thank you.

    Thank you all for your advice. It certainly was amazing what you were able to do with your suggestions.  As mentioned,  I am trialling photoshop elements (before deciding it is a product that I can use with ease) and was facinated by the ease of use on the tutorials, particularly the content aware move function. If I am not mistaken, it seems to suggest it is a matter of highlighting the object to be deleted / moved, then choose the content aware move function, and photoshop will do all the 'patching' and merging of surroundings.  So basically a click of a button.  Unfortunately I couldn't find that function on the trial version of the product.  So was wondering if the function is actually available on the trial version so I can see if I can use it before resorting to other alternatives.  Thank you.

  • UnsupportedOperationException Error while removing object from List

    Hi,
    I need to remove a set of objects from List if it contains similar objects as the other one.
    Follwing is the code snippet of the above scenario...
    List selectedPaxList = new ArrayList();
    TreeSet seatAssignedPaxlist= new TreeSet();
    selectedPaxList.add("1");
    selectedPaxList.add("2");
    selectedPaxList.add("3");
    seatAssignedPaxlist.add("1");
    seatAssignedPaxlist.add("2");
    if(selectedPaxList.containsAll(seatAssignedPaxlist))
    selectedPaxList.removeAll(seatAssignedPaxlist);
    If i do this in java program it executes fine without any error.But if I do the same in JSP I am getting the following error......
    java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
    at java.util.AbstractList.remove(AbstractList.java:167)
    at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.remove(AbstractList.java:432)
    at java.util.AbstractCollection.removeAll(AbstractCollection.java:351)
    Plz... help me to resolve the issue

    java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException
    at
    java.util.AbstractList.remove(AbstractList.java:167)
    at
    java.util.AbstractList$Itr.remove(AbstractList.java:43
    2)
    at
    java.util.AbstractCollection.removeAll(AbstractCollect
    ion.java:351)
    That stack trace looks wrong to me.
    ArrayList overrides the remove method, so it
    shouldn't be using the method in AbstractList. That's what I thought, too. There is either something missing or it's not an ArrayList. In fact the javadoc of AbstractList.remove sais:
    "This implementation always throws an UnsupportedOperationException."
    So it really looks like another subclass is used.
    Also
    the object it is trying to remove is a list (from
    your exmaple it should be a String)
    I could be wrong.These are just the code references not the parameters, I think.
    -Puce

Maybe you are looking for