Removing Flicker from Shot

Hi,
I have shot some video of a person speaking, with a projected image in the background which is flickering all the way through. I zoom in and out throughout, but there is nothing in front of the projected image (the image is to the left of the person speaking).
Is there a plugin I can use to remove the flicker? It is very distracting to the viewer!
Many thanks

Similar Messages

Need Help to remove flicker from DSLR Video

Im working in Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 with a DSLR timeline.
Im using a EOS 7D, Nikon D7000, and a T2i.
The video was taped at an executive office and I had his two desk monitors as a background.
The canon footage has a problem, the monitors have a banding/flicker effect on them and it is quite distracting
I have tried using the standard anti-flicker effect (under motion effects) to no avail.
Does anyone know how I can remove this banding, it is very crucial to the overall video and I would be willing to use a third party
plug-in.
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

In terms of dealing with it at capture:
True "video roll" is not a problem on LCDs, as there's no scanning beam - the display flickers all at the same time. Unfortunately with the rolling shutter in a DSLR, the sensor read order clashes with the flickering of the display leading to banding if the shutter speed doesn't match a multiple of the refresh rate. There's no cure-all solution with a prosumer camera - on something like an EX1 you can dial in whatever crazy shutter speed you want until it cures the problem - if you're filming laser displays and find you need 1/62.86, only pro gear can do it - but with DSLRs you have to pick a shutter speed from what's available, and set the monitor to refresh at a multiple of that rate. We've got it easier in the UK with PAL, as we don't have to compensate for the "crystal" values of NTSC.
DSLRs do however have one advantage - the live view on the back of the camera shows the effect too, so you can tweak settings in real time and find the best combination.
CRTs displaying broadcast TV are easy to deal with, as you can usually match your shutter speed with the stock options on a DSLR (1/60 for NTSC, 1/25 for PAL). CRT monitors for computer display can have a whole range of strange scan speeds depending on the model and resolution (60, 70, 80, 90 Hz), and if you can't find a match with your available shutter speeds, again change the sync refresh rate in the computer's display settings. You may still get a thin black line on the display, but from a distance it'll look OK.
If for some reason you need to shoot 24fps and have an NTSC monitor in the shot, the trick is to keep a matched shutter speed (1/60) so you're running a non-standard 144-degree shutter angle. In the film days, Arri made special 144-degree shutters for this type of work, and you could also rent TVs converted to scan at 24fps, but it played havoc with lighting. Now you can get 144 deg with the standard settings on most DSLRs, or as said previously turn the thing off when shooting, and paint it back in post (which has the second advantage that you can mirror the footage for composition purposes without mirroring the stuff on the screen). Just remember to blur the composited screenshot or it'll look fake.

How to remove flicker effect from screens / projections?

Hey,
I wondered if there's an option within Premiere Pro CC ( or AE) to remove flicker effects from screens and projections. I attached a jpg as an example of such a projection. Here is an anti flicker option in Premiere Pro, but it doesn't seem to have an effect on my problem.
Cheers

You need to shoot scenes like that using a camera that allows Synchro-Scan, which can adjust the cameras scanning rate to that of the display in the shot. Any mismatch between camera and siaplay is what causes the flicker, and Synchro-Scan is the only way to correct it without entirely removing the screen from teh shot and replacing it with another, usually via After Effects.

Is there any way I can view / remove pictures from Camera Roll on the iPhone, on a Mac, without actually importing the files?

Is there any way I can view / remove pictures from Camera Roll on the iPhone, on a Mac, without actually importing the files? I just want to view / delete files without importing them.
For instance I have 1200 photos on my iPhone Camera Roll. Some of these are shots, that I've taken multiple times, some good, some bad. I just want to clean up my Camera Roll, but going through the pictures on the iPhone's small screen is tedious. I'd much rather look at the camera roll's photo's on my Mac, and then decide which files I'd like to keep, and which to delete.
I don't want to import the files, as when I import the files, and delete them from Camera Roll, now the Photo's are not on my phone, and the only way to get them back on my Phone is to Import them back in using iTunes, and then they go into the Picture Library and not the Camera Roll.
In the same way as I can view Pics from my digital camera's SD card on a Mac without having to actually copy them to my computer, is there any app out there that will let me view my iPhone pics without importing them.

gsharp01 wrote:
Is there any way I can view / remove pictures from Camera Roll on the iPhone, on a Mac, without actually importing the files? I just want to view / delete files without importing them.
The short answer is yes.
Connect your iPhone to your computer.
Open Image Capture application.
Click on the 4 little squares at bottom to view them as photos, not a list.
Select the photos them click the No Entry icon at bottom to delete.

I have 1 music library, but 2 iphones; how do i remove songs from 1 and leave them on another?

i have 2 iphones and 1 music library on my laptop. i just install ios7 today on one phone and now i'm seeing my entire music library on that when I really just want the playlists. i unchecked all of the music in the library but it still syncs and shows all of the songs on the phone. how do i get rid of all of the songs on the phone?

Hi tmilbut,
Welcome to the Support Communities!
The information below may be able to answer your questions about how to delete items from a playlist on an iPod.
iPod Nano User Guide - Remove items from a playlist - page 23
http://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1624/en_US/ipod_nano_user_guide.pdf
Remove items from a playlist:
1 On the Home screen, tap Music > Playlists, then tap the playlist you want to edit.
2 Flick down, then tap Edit.
3 Tap next to the item you want to delete, then tap Delete when it appears on the right.
4 When you finish, tap Done.
Delete a playlist:
1 On the Home screen, tap Music > Playlists.
2 Flick down, then tap Edit.
3 Tap next to the playlist you want to delete, then tap Delete when it appears next to the playlist.
If you tapped the wrong playlist, tap the one you want to remove.
4 Tap Delete, or tap Cancel if you change your mind.
5 When you finish, flick up, then tap Done (or swipe right to return to the Home screen if you cancel).
Cheers,
- Judy

What are these shared computers and how do I remove them from Finder?

I have four Macs on my closed, hidden wifi network. Two iMacs and Two macbooks. For some reason, two unknown computers are showing up on the network, but only on two out of the four macs, one imac and one macbook, incedentally the two units with built in SD card readers. They are: hp0025b3e8a8ca and hp3c4a921329ca. I'll post a screen shot. They both have one folder called MEMORY_CARD and I can't open it. I've double checked, I don't have SMB sharing enabled on any of my macs. They have the little icon associated with a windows machine. Any idea what these are and how I can remove them from finder? is someone else on my network?

How are u connected, as in ISP, University Network, etc.? I get shares like that too, as my ISP here in Nepal is using some crazy way of sharing connections with customers. I called and asked them once, but they have not clue about Macs. I suspect it's a technician doing some work in the office, who is tapped into the same C1 connection that I am using, but it is a bit disconcerting to see computers you don't know on your Network.
When I teach in Thailand, I am on a university system that will show all the users connected to the same hotspot. That's why I lock down my sharing when there. It's kinda crazy, as I don't really understand all the security settings and what they imply. It would be nice if there were a guide for home/small business Lans on what exactly the settings should be in OSX, but I suppose it's all out there in Google, somewhere...

Remove DRM from Independent Labels

One way that Apple can show that it takes seriously the topics brought up in Steve Jobs's article, "Thoughts on Music", is to remove DRM from all material where the content producer did not specifically ask for it.
There are many independent labels who wish their music to be as open as possible to a broader community. DRM gets between them and their customers.
Please consider removing DRM from all content where the content producer did not request or require it.
Thank you,
Mike Shea

It wont happen. Apple has DRM accross the board is to offer a consistant product. Lets face the facts that if 90% of all music is required DRM (shot in the dark) people who dont get the DRM thng (most customers) will be totaly lost if only a few songs have DRM and others dont. Apple stripping DRM from music that doesnt require them means very little to the Recording companies anyway.

Problem removing folder from Lightroom

HI,
I'm new to Lightroom (using 5) and I am trying to get some photo uploads organized. When I imported them, they came in a folder that was poorly organized so I moved them into folders that I preferred. That was fine. BUT now the original folder in lightroom is empty (I deleted from finder after emptying it) and when I remove it from my lightroom ALL the other folders go with it. The funny part is, the total picture count still shows that all the pictures are in lightroom and accounted for, but the folders are no longer there and accessible.
I have attached a screen shot of the folders. I would like to remove the 2014 folder at the top, but when I do, the desktop folder and everything under it goes as well. Why? And how do i prevent that from happening? THANKS!!
Ultimately, I would like to move the 2014 folder from being on the desktop as well.
I

Your lack of tact was a little bit insulting, regardless of when it happened. No big deal though. I digress.
Since you cannot view folders in iTunes, you cannot delete folders thru iTunes.
You could put all the songs you want to delete into a playlist then select all the songs and Command Delete to delete them all at once.
That's the point. There should be an easier way. But putting them into a playlist before deleting them would be even more work than just deleting them the first time you click them. So this isn't really helpful either.
Ed's answer was helpful because he addressed the concerns of the original poster. But it also illustrated the need for iTunes programmers to include a feature to remove a folder from your iTunes library as easily as you can add them. If the best way to remove 200GB worth of music from your itunes library is to change the file extensions, then click to delete every single file with an exclamation point next to it; there is quite simply a flaw in design.
Apple iTunes programmers need to make the adjustment. Right next to the "File" command: "Add folder to library", you could have a command to "Remove folder from library." Or a "Manage Library" option would be great. Itunes obviously knows what folders it's library consists of so why not allow it to populate a list of them with the option to deselect undesired folders? Why hasn't this been done in one of the numerous iTunes updates? Is it really that hard to understand?

Removed user from group, user no longer has access to documents even though user is owner of documents

I'm running a server 2012 std domain and I'm in the process of rebuilding our fileserver after we had some pretty serious permission issues. Bad permissions (Everyone had full access to user documents share) were migrated when we move to the new server and
then by some strange Monday morning freak out all users lost access to their documents. I restored from backups, redirected everyone's folders back to local computer and started to reconfigure the share permissions. I moved our administration group back to
the server after securing proper permissions for folder redirection (permissions copied from https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj649078.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396 table 1, only difference is instead of creating a new security group
for redirection users, I used the everyone group) to test and everything went perfectly. The GPO created the users folders under the root and redirection was good to go. Along with that, other users cannot access other users documents anymore which was the
intended outcome.
Last night I was looking at security groups and see that our administration group (back office group: accounting, HR, etc..) was a member of the domain admins. I removed them from the domain admins group and added them to the administrators group (they do
need regular admin access) then went on like normal. This morning, all users in that group can no longer access their documents on the server. I immediately think that permissions were broken again and started to get angry, but then realize that all the files
are still accessible on the server (no lost permissions like before) and the user is still shown as the owner with full permissions, but the files are inaccessible to those users. I re-added them to the domain admins group, logged out, logged back in and documents
are back and accessible by the user. Remove them from the domain admins group, log out, log back in and the documents are inaccessible again. Re-add to the domain admins group and back to normal.
Which leads me to now. If the users are part of the domain admins group, they have access to their files. If they are removed from the domain admins group, they lose access. When they lose access, they are still the owners of the files/folders with full
permissions, yet they can't access their documents. Also, just to add, the domain admins group has no specified permissions on the files or folders. See screenshots below..
Here is the root share.
And the user's desktop folder. The folder is owned by the user with full permissions. This is the folder the redirection GPO created.
Any ideas why removing the group from domain admins would drop access to their files? They are still the owners of the files and should have full access but they don't. Is there something I'm not seeing here?

Effective Access shows the user has full control of the Desktop folder
This is a problem with the Effective Access tab when using CREATOR OWNER. As you have noticed, the user doesn't really have the access that the tab says it does. This is because of how CREATOR OWNER works.
CREATOR OWNER is only evaluated when a file/folder is created.
IF a user can create a file/folder, then the permissions assigned to CREATOR OWNER are copied to a new permissions entry for that user.
To see this:
Logon as an administrator and create a file in the Desktop folder in your screenshot.
Examine the permissions of the new file.
You'll see that there is a new entry for the account you logged on with.
CREATOR OWNER is gone. CREATOR OWNER would still be there if you created a folder (because of "subfolders and files").
In the Desktop folder (in your screenshot), only SYSTEM and Administrator can create/access files.
To fix this, you need to grant the users the ability to list the directory contents and create new files/folders. This corresponds with the suggestion of Table 1 in the document you found.
I see what you're saying about Administrators domain group. I'll just add them as local admins via GPO and that should solve that issue.
No, scary! This will grant those users administrative permission on your server. They will be able to see any file anywhere on that server.
If your goal is to provide a place that is private for each user, then the simplest approach is to grant each user permission to their own folder. Like this for Test User:
Notes for above:
I set the user's permission to Modify because there is no good reason why the user should change these permissions
The owner of this folder is unimportant. I leave it set to Administrators
You can, and I do, remove CREATOR OWNER. It adds no value in this situation and just causes confusion.
As for the second screen shot, the *-Admins folder is the root to which Everyone has special permissions on and can create folders. The folder for M* was created by the GPO, which makes M* the owner to which they have Full control of subfolders and files.
The GPO also created the Desktop folder, giving owner full permissions of subfolders and files. Inside the Desktop folder, permissions remain Full control for owner for subfolders and files. Even if it was the case that they only had permissions on subfolders
and files, wouldn't each subfolder under that one be considered a subfolder and file of the top folder?
If this works as you say, then Yes, it should work. But, I don't see the entries for use M*. Remember, there should be entries for the M* user that is a duplicate of CREATOR OWNER.
I suspect that Group Policy is creating the directories (elevated) and then changing the owner to M* afterward. This does not duplicate the CREATOR OWNER entries as needed. If this is the case, I consider it a flaw because your permissions do
not allow user M* to create files/folders, and group policy shouldn't bypass security.
I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just curious why the technet article would advise Creator/Owner giving full control of subfolders and files only if that were not correct. I can add the permissions for the users easily, I just don't see why I need to give
explicit permissions to access something when the GPO created those folders for me, which Microsoft recommends you allow. If the GPO can create folders and the folders are owned by the user, then the user can obviously add/create/modify/view those files and
folders.
When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
A couple things:
The article instructed the use of Folder Redirection Users group that had permissions to create files. Your examples didn't have that. Because of this, your user could create new files.
The article assumes that the directories you are creating will be empty. Existing files will be unreadable to everyone except Admins.
If you follow the directions in the article, then anyone in the Folder Redirection Users group can write files to anyone else's directory.
One benefit of the document's approach is that all the users could be redirected to the same folder using the article, and it would work. A benefit, I guess.
But, I like my user's separate and unable to see each other's files -- at all. This is why I recommend replacing CREATOR OWNER with the specific user.
I believe this document is a "how to get it done" document, not necessarily a best practices document. I see it as a starting point, and that's why I didn't follow it exactly.
Lastly, CREATOR OWNER permissions are useful but confusing. I avoid them unless I have the rare circumstance where they are perfect.
When I restored the data, no permission were reset. Permissions were restored to the wonky version where the Everyone group has full access to everything. Ownership of the files/folders remained the same.
To summarize:
In the user's directory, you need to provide permission to list and create new files/folders, and you need grant the user permission to the existing files.
-Tony

Why can't I remove attachments from emails in the Sent items folder?

I Recently upgraded from Snow Leopard to Lion, and so far, there are at least a couple of things that puzzle me.
One is that now I don't have the option to "Remove Attachments" from emails in the sent items folder. It seems to work normally
in the Inbox and Drafts folders, but not in the Sent items. Go figure ???
Another thing that bothers me is that in Preview, when I save a screen shot, or a scan, etc., I no longer have the option of saving it as a GIF
(which, when better quality isn't absolutely necessary, is often much lower in KB or MB than a PNG or JPG, etc.. When I store lots of things as such images, I'd rather have that option.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.

I have now created a smart mailbox as described above (good idea), and although I have some 50 messages in my Sent box, all with attachments (waiting to be removed so I can store the messages in the proper mailboxes), the smart mailbox is empty. So, Mail doesn't recognise these messages as containing attachments.
This led me to think that maybe Mail has been redesigned to work the way you would expect it to, at last; to contain a link to attachments instead of including them in all their bits and bytes. That would mean that the messages in my Sent box - with attachments - could be stored in local (or server-side) mailboxes without taking up extensive space.
But then I checked the size of my Sent Messages folder inside the Mail Folder in Finder, and - whoops - it's 50+ MB. So the sent messages do contain attachments all right. And Mail doesn't recognise these, since a) the smart mailbox trick says that the messages are free from attachments, and b) the Remove Attachments menu option is disabled.
I will have to wait for the next Mail update, and my Sent box will grow accordingly ...

Removing name from contact list

There is a group to which I send a general e mail a few times a month. I have these contacts listed under a group name, so when I type in the group name under "To" all the names appear. There is one person who no longer wants to receive the group notices, and I have completely removed her name and contact information from my address book, but when I type the group name in my "To" box her name still appears. She has a "hotmail" account, as do several other members of my group. Is there anything else I can do, short of trying to remember to delete her name every time I send an e mail to this group?

When you get hold of one of those first line reps on the phone, it depends very much on just who happened to answer the call. Some of them are very good. Others not so much. The only reason I found out about the memory for the To: line is that another poster had asked about it and I contacted Plaxo about it. There was an exchange of emails and they explained how the thing works.
Do you see "Forget" to the right of the first 3 o 4 names when that list comes up? I had no idea what that was for. It is the automated sorting software that the mail program uses to determine what addresses you use most often when typing in a given letter/word combination into the To: field. It then ranks them in that order. If you want it to change you click on Forget and it should remove it from the spot in the list. At least that's what was explained to me. But when I first asked them about it they tried to tell me it was something to do with my browser, which it is not. So I sent them a screen shot of it and then they said "oh wait----yeah------that thingy", and then gave me the correct information.
They don't all know all the features of the mail program or address book.

How to remove java from os x 10.7

currently i am running os x 10.7.5. here is a screen shot of the java version.
java version "1.6.0_37"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_37-b06-434-11M3909)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.12-b01-434, mixed mode)
i have run the sudo rm -rf /System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/
how can i remove java completeley from my machine?

johny1010 wrote:
my system has been hacked. for security purpose, i like to remove java from my machine since i don't need java to perform work.
The only part of Java that is vulnerable to any known threat is the plug-in. As long as you remove it from /Library/Internet Plug-Ins/ you should never have any issues with Java.
As you will note in looking through the various recommended solutions, completely removing Java is difficult and time consuming. You will also be removing some of the files that originally came with Lion, which could possibly damage your OS.

How do i remove money from 1 itunes account to another ?

How Do I Remove Money From One Itunes Account To Another ?

See: More Like This To the right -->

I've had three laptops all connected to my itunes account, one was stolen, the other broke, how can I remove them from my itunes account?

So, in three years, after getting an iphone and an apple account I've had to replace a laptop twice due to theft or damage. When I link my phone to my new computer, it asks me if I want to connect the computer with the phone and I say yes, but you can only have 5 devices connected to one account, since one was stolen, and the other laptop broke, how do I remove them from my account??

De-authorise all, then authorise the one you still have.

How can we remove items from the VF04 list?

We have a long list of items in VF04 that, for various reasons (some process related, some due to errors), are not to be billed. We have looked at applying filters to the list but there is nothing really suitable to hide these individual documents e.g. we could filter out some dates where none of the items on that date are to be billed but other dates have a mix of items we want to bill and others we don't.
I have done a search of this forum but didn't find a previous topic with a quick and simple method to remove items from the list .
Is there a method, other than billing them or sorting each issue individually, to permanently remove individual documents from the VF04 list?
Thanks in advance for any help.
David

Hi,
David,
Download a list of Pending delivers doc form VF04.
Paste the list in T.Code : VL09 (Delivery reversal) and reverse the delivery.
Then go to T.Code: VL06G Select the list of deliveries that has been reversed, select/delete all un- wanted deliveries.
This way you can remove all unwanted pending deliveries forn Billing due list (VF04).
Thanks & Regards,
R.Janakiraman

Removing Flicker from Shot

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for