Report authorization problem 0BI_ALL

Hi Experts,
I have few days pending issue (trying to solve on my own but all the time some other error is popping out)
There are 2 reports which need to be assign to 2 users. I can log in and see the report in Analyzer (on user desktop) and in SAP directly but user while login is facing problem:
1st Analyzer was giving error "an error occurred while communicating with BI serv" I figure it out that there s value RFCH missing.. that was added... after in su53 system asked for authorization RSRT- added (but not sure if it s ok ) now it says authorization 0BI_ALL missing
So for sure I cannot give 0BI_ALL but how to fix the problem??

Hi
Your Issue was not clear as per my understanding if user getting issue when opening Bex then that is different issue because GUI.
Now user can able to login to system and when executing report if he is getting issues then issue with missing authorizations.
You have not mention abt your Authorization model if you are using RSECADMIN then login with developer id and go to RSECADMIN and under Analysis select execute as provide user id name and tick check box With log and start the trasaction provide your report once it gives error then come back to same screen chek the log it will give you clear picture abt the missing authorizations.
Regards
Jagadeesh

Similar Messages

HT204088 How do you report a problem with a purchase you did not authorize?

I have some unauthorized charges and when I click on "report a problem" on the bottom of the purchase history, it renews the page with "report a problem" next too all the purchases. When I click on one of those, it just takes me right back to the iTunes home page. Does anyone know how to do this please?

Welcome to the Apple Community.
Try contacting Apple through iTunes Store Support

BW report authorization for restrict cost center

dear all,
i have problem on BW report authorization for restrict cost center.....when i execute the query, after selection screen, appear error message 'you cannot change zv_cctr for characteristic 0COSTCENTER during query'.
note : zv_cctr is variable restriction for costcenter, type processing = customer exit.
below the customer exit :
WHEN 'ZV_CCTR'.
    IF i_step = 2.
      DATA : gt_mstuidvscc TYPE TABLE OF ztbw_mstuidvscc,
             gs_mstuidvscc TYPE ztbw_mstuidvscc,
             wa_final2(10) TYPE c.
      SELECT * FROM ztbw_mstuidvscc INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE gt_mstuidvscc
        WHERE userid = 'sy-uname'.
      LOOP AT gt_mstuidvscc INTO gs_mstuidvscc.
        wa_final2 = gs_mstuidvscc-kostl.
        l_s_range-opt = 'EQ'.
        l_s_range-high = wa_final2.
        APPEND l_s_range TO e_t_range.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
Regards,
Tony

i defined variable as ready for input and mandatory.
regards,
Tony

How I fixed my authorization problem

There have been many posts on the authorization problem that has cropped up since the latest update of iTunes, and there doesn't seem to be universal cure. I fought it myself for a couple of weeks, and recently fixed it on my PowerBook and thought I would share it with others.
The common theme here seems to be that it affects people who have had more than one account in iTunes. For the record, I have NEVER purchased music from the iTMS using a different account, so I was confused as to why this was happening to me.
I have two Macs in play here: an older eMac at home and a PowerBook G4. My initial iTunes library started on the eMac, and then I moved it to my PowerBook a little over a year ago when I bought it. I purchased music from the iTMS on both Macs, using the exact same account.
When I upgraded iTunes on my PowerBook, I reauthorized using my only account, and the music that I had purchased since I transfered my library worked just fine. The music that I had purchased on my eMac simply would not authorize!
It dawned on me yesterday that I setup a .mac account on my PowerBook several months ago, although I never used it in the iTMS and I never used it on the eMac at home. I also realized that I had NOT run iTunes on the eMac since the most recent upgrade.
I installed the iTunes upgrade on my eMac, and proceeded to authorize it with my only known iTMS account. No issues, and all purchased music was auhtorized, including songs that would not play on my PowerBook.
On my PowerBook, I decided to authorize using my .mac username and password, even though I have NEVER used it to purchase music. I didn't even own that account when the music files in question were purchased. As I suspected though, the authorization went through and I can now play all of my purchased music from iTMS.
When I try to step through this logically, it makes my head hurt. There is definitely a major problem with Apple's DRM authorization relationship somewhere, as there should be no reason at ALL for any of my music to require my .mac account.
I don't know if this will help anyone, but if you're struggling with it and you have a .mac account, give it a shot and it might work.

The fact that you saw no glitches while running Logic before applying the update means almost nothing because that uses only a small subset of system resources. Far more significant is that Safe Mode restored some missing functionality: because it disables non-essential items like user fonts, third party drivers, & so on, it points to problems in those areas.
Equally significant, the fact that there are relatively few reports of post-update problems among the several million Snow Leopard users points away from the update itself as the cause of your problems.
Separate & apart from that, it so happens that I'm a sound engineer/system designer/board operator with nearly 40 years of professional touring experience. FWIW, I never have & never will update the software of any system I must rely on professionally (whether it is running on a Mac, a PC, or dedicated hardware) unless & until I can thoroughly test it first and I have a trustworthy backup/recursion strategy to fall back on in case of problems.
I strongly suggest you learn from your unpleasant experience & do the same. I have had far fewer problems with Macs than with PC's, but nothing is 100% reliable to begin with. Changing the OS software part way through the tour is just asking for trouble, no matter how reliable that has been in the past. Even if the budget allows for nothing better than a stack of burned CD's & a couple of consumer grade CD players, no professional tour can afford to be without some fallback strategy in place. That should be self-evident & require no warning from Apple or anybody else.

Reporting authorization issue after BI 701 05 EHP1 upgrade

Hello,
We have recently upgraded our BI 7.0 to BI 701 EHP1 with 05 patch level. After this we had a problem with reporting authorizations for a report (query), which has created under Virtual Infoprovider.
Earlier the report use to be execute perfectly with authorizations S_RS_ICUBE object with Act 03, Subobject DATA, but after upgrade to EHP1, while executing report its throwing a error pasted below.
=============================================================================================
"Diagnosis
Errors occured while reading a VirtualProvider outside the BI system. Check whether the previous error messages contains any information about the possible cause of this error.
It is possible that the error message can not be displayed because the error message class does not exist in the BI system. If this is the case, only the name of the error class and the message number are displayed. View the error class in the source system of the VirtualProvider.
System Response
Procedure
Since the error is not necessarily in the BI system, there is no specific procedure for resolving it. With VirtualProviders, problems often occure with the connection to the system; these can lead to system termination. If the code for the VirtualProvider is not from the SAP, contact the relevant person to help resolve the issue.
If an SQL error is listed in the previous message, see the procedure for SQL errors."
===============================================================================================
After running st01 trace we identified the missing authorization is S_RS_ICUBE with Act 03, subobject DEFINATION.
Here please tell why is the subobject check is performed to execute a report (query), as this is happening after EHP1 upgrade, so let me know if anyone had any clue on this ...
Thanks

Hi Martin,
Thanks for reply.
The assumption what you made are correct, but these are the possible reasons only. Is there any specific note or any info from sap that these changes came due to the new release change, so that i can tell my manager clearly.
And I am not sure whether this is impacting the reports which using the VirtualProviders (Virtual CUBE) in place. If you could get bit more information that will be helpful...Thanks in advance.
Sridhar

How to deal authorization problem in KE30

Hi to all
Please tell me how to deal authorization problem in KE30.
My requirement is to restrict report based on sales office so that other region's emplyee can't be able to see different regions sales data.
Please guide me on this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Anubhav

closed.

I report a problem last month for something i did not buy ,, how can i track it to see if i got refund or just lost a case ?

when we report a problem on a purchase we did not meant or authorize how can we track it and find out if we got refunded ?
best
Charlie

Click here and fill out the form for assistance.
(35548)

Reporting authorization in BW 3.5: use of colon ":"

Hello,
we are using in our BW 3.5 system a reporting authorization object ZAUTHOBJ. ZAUTHOBJ is defined on exactly one InfoObject ZINFOBJ (e.g. country).
Some of our users have the following authorization
ZINFOBJ = :
so that they view the values of an KYF aggregated with the characteristic ZINFOBJ. They cannot drill down to a certain value of ZINFOBJ, e.g. by filtering to a specific value.
We are facing the following problem:
If the user with the ":" authorization defines a query with an excluding filter on ZINFOBJ, e.g. excluding certain values, the query aggregates the KYF on the remaining values of the characteristic ZINFOBJ.
So by this "backdoor" the user can find out the KYF of specific ZINFOBJ values.
Is this a feature or a bug of SAP BW?
Best regards
Lothar

Hi,
We can think it as Back door or we can say We are misusing the concept of : in authorization.
If we have to use ZAUTHOBJ = :, in any case we are not going to give Country as the free characterstic , Part of rows, and filter area.
That means noware we use the country in the query.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

I've redownloaded several songs via reporting a problem to itunes. Still several of the songs remain partial audio, but appear to be fully downloaded. What can I do?

I've redownloaded several songs via reporting a problem to itunes. Still several of the songs remain partial audio but appear to be fully downloaded. Itunes doesn't allow me to report a problem again... What can I do?

On the new laptop, launch iTunes. From the menu bar click Store / Authorize This Computer.
iTunes Store: Transferring purchases from your iPhone, iPad, or iPod to a computer

S_RS_IOBJ - authorization problem

Hi
How in Nw2004s implement this problem:
Query have characteristic 0material, 0comp_code and 0customer.
User A must see only 0material and user B 0comp_code and 0customer.
Create 2 query isn't good solution.
Best Regards
Piotr

Dear Piotr,
Sorry but a donu2019t understand you question,
Regarding the authorization system in BI 2004s, you have two levels. First, you restrict access by object (authorization object, mange through tcode: pfcg); second, you restrict access by characteristic and navigational attribute values (analysis authorizacion, manage through tcode: rsecadmin).
If BW 3.5 it works good, the problem must be in the reporting authorization object 3.5, now analysis authorization in 7.0. Because the authorizations object has the same behaviour in both versions.
According explanation give above, you should be focus in the analysis authorization, but I need more details. For example the User A and User B what do they do?, they can create query, or only execute query. In case of, they only need execute query and display data. The authorization by focus in analysis authorization, and we need have to check, the query structure, and what characteristics (0MATERIAL, 0COMP_CODE, 0CUSTOMER) in InfoProvider are joined and which characteristic are relevant of authorization.
For example, in your scenario, you need that user A should display 0MATERIAL value,
In this case you need to create an analysis authorization (through tcode: RSECAUTH), where have to the following design:
0MATERIAL: specific values that you need
0COMP_CODE: u201C:u201D aggregate value
0CUSTOMER: u201C:u201D aggregate value
For the user B, the design must be:
0MATERIAL: u201C:u201D aggregate value
0COMP_CODE: specific values that you need
0CUSTOMER: specific values that you need
I hope this suggestion can help you to answer your question,
Luis

Profit center and comapny code missing authorization problem.

Could you help any body,i have some missing authorization problem with profit center and company code,
How to search the roles which having require profit and company code values.
Is there any way to search.
Please let us know very fast.
Thanks in advance

Another, and probably much easier way, is just to use Ctrl + Y... and use subsets of the selections in the SUIM reports.
But I can well understand the temptation to use tables or at least double-check the SUIM output against them.
The bugger with tables is that you can easy make the same mistakes or more than the SUIM reports do, or use old obsolete tables, or incorrect logic when interpreting single fields of the user tables.
Personally, I would normally check the exits first. Developers don't always raise self-explanatory messages...
Cheers,
Julius

HT2075 Why won't it let my report a problem on a in-app purchase?

My 4 year old purchased an in-app during a game, for $99.99. I tried to contact iTunes but all I got was an email that I should report a problem with the purchase, but it will not let me. I try but when I push on it, it won't do anything. Can someone help me..... I understand that all sales are final, but I did not authorize this transaction and with times like these, I would really like a refund, because I have no need for 5200 gold pieces in Deer Hunter Reloaded, lol!

In my experience you will not get any meaningful response (i.e. other than boilerplate) via email. I called this number for apple last week - 800-275-2273 - which incidentally I did NOT get from the apple website but from Slate.com - and got right through to someone who helped me with my problem. I never make any purchases from apple that are not absoultely necessary anymore, for example music I get from amazon.com, whose downloads actually work and who has a respnove tech support dept.

Dear Apple Support, Good day to you. This is to report the problem i encountered when i updated my Ipad mini to the new IOS 8.1.. After the update my Ipad restart and after that it appears a picture that need to connect to itunes and need to resto

Dear Apple Support,
Good day to you.
This is to report the problem i encountered when i updated my Ipad mini to the new IOS 8.1..
After the update my Ipad restart and after that it appears a picture that need to connect to itunes and need to restore. So i connect it to itunes and wait to restore my ipad mini because it is not opening.
After restoring it my ipad is now opening and it is like new that i need to set up again.
I set up again until i reach the apple id and password.
I put my below apple ID and password to unlock my ipad but it didn't work. The message i receive is "the apple ID cannot be used to unlock this Ipad.
What will I do? Please help.
Thank you
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Apple <[email protected]***>
Date: October 9, 2013 at 11:53:53 PM GMT+4
To: ****
Subject: Your Apple ID was used to sign in to iCloud and iMessage on an iPad mini
Dear Leslie J.,
Your Apple ID was used to sign in to iCloud and iMessage on an iPad mini named “Leslie Joye's iPad”.
If you have not recently set up an iPad with your Apple ID, then you should change your Apple ID password. Learn more.
Apple Support
<Email Edited By Host>

1. It is never a good idea to include personal info like your email address or Apple ID in a post on an open forum.
2. The email you received DOES NOT say your Apple ID cannot be used to unlock this iPad. The email informs you that your Apple ID was used to unlock an iPad. Fortunately the iPad is yours. The message confirms that. If your Apple ID was used to unlock an iPad that was not yours your would then know to change your password. Since the iPad is yours you do not need to change your password.
Is your iPad working?

How can I report a problem with downloading?

I purchased a rather long album and halfway through downloading it gave me the message, "We could not complete your istore request. The network connection timed out. Error 8003." The only guidance it offers is to check the network connection. Nothing wrong there. Now I can get into the store and the balance of the album no longer shows up under downloads, just old stuff that really shouldn't even be there. I went into my account, and under purchase history clicked onto "Report a problem." All I got out of that is the same page minus the report a problem button.
I'm frankly sick of this iphone and all the problems I've encountered with their upgrade failures, but this disappearig report a problem just tells me they really don't want to hear from you and no one is minding the store.
Any other places to report a problem? Or advice onto how to get the missing songs?
Thanks., I've just spent the last 1-1/2 hours on this board and going back and forth in the istore and am very frustrated.

Click here and fill out the form for assistance.
(35548)

HT5429 How long after you report a problem does it take for the fix to be picked up in maps?

How long after you report a problem does it take for the fix to be picked up in maps? The street I live on is misspelled. It's shown as one word, but it should be two words. Maps cannot find the address when it is spelled correctly, so I have it purposely misspelled it as one word in my contacts, which helps for the most part, however it still tries to place my home on an entirely different street all together. Fortunately this new random street is at least close to where I live. When I used to spell my street correctly with two words, maps would try to send me to the next town over. So it kind of works, as long as I misspell my street, and ignore the fact that it is showing where I live to be a couple of streets down from where I actually live. I live in Connecticut - not in the most populated of areas, but not in the middle of nowhere either. Amazingly enough Google Maps will correctly find my address whether it's spelled with one words or two words. Google Maps also shows my apartment complex, which Apple Maps does not. I really wish Apple would just do a quick pass of the area to fix these issues. I’ve reported the problem several times, months ago. How long will it take for there to be a fix? I keep trying to use the Apple ecosystem, but Google is clearly the better solution for me.

Apple does not do the GIS data for maps. That comes from 3rd party vendors like Tom Tom. I have read it takes some time to update map data. The only thing you can do is report it.
Not to belittle your complaint, but on my end it is Apple that is clearly better. When looking at my house in Google, the satellite photo is more than 4 years old, and the Apple one is much newer. I can tell because of the condition of my home and the neighbor's. They had an above ground pool which was removed 4 years ago and it shows on the Google Map. I had remodeling and roof work done to my home that started 3 years ago and Apple's satellite view showed this work done, which took over a year to complete. I live in the middle of a block in a rural town. Both Apple and Google split the block into 100 parts and put my home close to the beginning of the block instead of where it actually sits. I've reported it to both Google and Apple and no one has changed. Just one of those things. But, keep your chin up, it will get corrected eventually.

Report authorization problem 0BI_ALL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for