Report does not match sql

i am trying to generate a simple report of customer count per request id from a single table
i created a request id group and a formula that counts the customer id in the table
when i run the report the sql is correct and will generate the counts i want if i run it against my db directly, bu the report shows the total customer count for each request id.
i have the 'perform grouping on server' checked in both the 'options...' and 'report options...'
thanks in advance

My problem really is that the report results don't match the sql.. i don't know why this is. apparently CR is doing something with the results after they come back from the server even though i have group on server turned on.
i got around the problem by qualifying the count on the request_id. i normally would not expect to have to do this, but it worked
count(subscriber_nr, request_id)
hopefully this will work when i have multiple group levels, which is where i am headed ultimately.
thanks for your efforts

Similar Messages

Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account

Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
Jane

When you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia

Sales Analysis report does not match Cost of Sales Account

My client is running SAP B1 8.81 PL 6. He has set all items to standard costing method. He has discovered that the difference between the Sales Amount and the Gross Profit amount on the Sales Analysis report, which should equal the Cost of Sales for the Items, does not match the Cost of Sales G/L account on the P&L report. If you look at a sample of rows, the above difference divided by the quantity equals the standard cost of the item. There are no manual journal entries that affect the COS account for the posting period that is being analyzed. I cannot see any mathmatical difference or problem with the above analysis, nor can I find the problem. There is about an $85K difference between the reports. The Sales Amount on the Sales Analysis report matches the revenue account on the P&L to the penny. Has anyone ever compared these 2 reports? Thank you for your help.
Bill Turek

If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
See screenshot:
-Eric Alo-
B1 Financial Consultant

Investment order reporting does not match with AM

Hello,
We are exectuing two reports 1) internal order report( for investment order) and asset history sheet.
Both the report figures should match. but due to some reason the internal order report shows less value than asset history sheet.
What can be the possible reason for the differences.
BR,
Zulfikar

Hi
Check whether the sales order creation date and actually when you created the delivery ? if say u created the sales order yesterday with yesterday date as delivery date and carried out delivery process to day means. The delivery date in the delivery process will be today date in that case delivery date wont match with sales order. This is one case like that so many cases are there.
Material might not be confirmed etc....
Regards,
Mullai

SQL CASE statement in XML template- End tag does not match start tag 'group

Hi All,
I am developing a report that has the SQL CASE statement in the query. I am trying to load this into RTF with report wizard and it gives me below error
oracle.xml.parser.v2.XMLParseException: End tag does not match start tag 'group'
Does XML publisher support CASE statement?
My query is something like this
SELECT customercode,
SUM(CASE WHEN invoicedate >= current date - 30 days
THEN balanceforward ELSE 0 END) AS "0-30",
SUM(CASE WHEN invoicedate BETWEEN current date - 60 days
AND current date - 31 days
THEN balanceforward ELSE 0 END) AS "31-60",
SUM(CASE WHEN invoicedate < current date - 60 days
THEN balanceforward ELSE 0 END) AS "61>",
SUM(balanceforward) AS total_outstanding
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY customercode
ORDER BY total_outstanding DESC
Please advice if the CASE statement or the double quotes are causing this error
Thanks,
PP

I got this to work in the XML but the data is returning zeros for all the case statements. When I run this in toad I get results for all the case conditions but when ran in XML the data displayed is all zeros. I am not sure what I am missing. Can someone shed some light on this please
Thanks!
PP

SQL Error: ORA-01861: literal does not match format string

Hello,
I'm trying to do data mining on a web log which recorded one day web access information from a busy web server. I imported the data into Oracle Data miner, and created a table (WEBLOG). The idea is to create a new field, i.e. session, for the users so that each session could be thought as a representative of a user-intent (aka topic). Now based on this, data mining models would be used to cluster(group) the users based on their similarity. The first step is to prepare the data which involves using SQL queries. So first, all I did was to create a function for date and time. This is the following code I used,
create or replace function ssndate(p_date in varchar2 default '03-01-18',
p_time in varchar2)
return number
$if dbms_db_version.ver_le_10 $then
deterministic
$elsif dbms_db_version.ver_le_11 $then
result_cache
$end
as
begin
return trunc((to_date(p_date||' '||p_time, 'dd-mm-yy hh24:mi:ss')
- to_date('01-01-90','dd-mm-yy')) * (86400/2400));
end ssndate;
The function ssndate compiled successfully.
The next step I took was to create a view through the following query,
create or replace view WEBLOG_VIEWS
as
select (select ssndate(LOG_DATE, LOG_TIME) from dual) as "SESSION_DT",
C_IP,
CS_USER_AGENT,
(CS_URI_STEM||'?'||CS_URI_QUERY) as WEB_LINK
from WEBLOG;
This was successful as well. The problem is in the next step where I try to do data grouping.
create table FINAL_WEBLOG as
select SESSION_DT, C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT,
listagg(WEB_LINK, ' ')
within group(order by C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT) "WEB_LINKS"
from WEBLOG_VIEWS
group by C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT, SESSION_DT
order by SESSION_DT
For this, I got the error,
Error starting at line 1 in command:
create table FINAL_LOG as
select SESSION_DT, C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT,
listagg(WEB_LINK, ' ')
within group(order by C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT) "WEB_LINKS"
from WEBLOG_VIEWS
group by C_IP, CS_USER_AGENT, SESSION_DT
order by SESSION_DT
Error at Command Line:1 Column:7
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-01861: literal does not match format string
ORA-06512: at "DMUSER.SSNDATE", line 11
ORA-06512: at line 1
01861. 00000 - "literal does not match format string"
*Cause: Literals in the input must be the same length as literals in
the format string (with the exception of leading whitespace).
If the "FX" modifier has been toggled on, the literal must
match exactly, with no extra whitespace.
*Action: Correct the format string to match the literal.
I don't know where I'm going wrong with this.. the to_date function should be fine. In the data that I possess, the date and time are in no format. Example: 30118 and 0:00:09 respectively. If anyone has any clue about this I would be sincerely grateful for any help that I can get!! It's quite urgent..
The Oracle version is 11.2.0.1.0
Edited by: 975265 on Dec 5, 2012 5:31 PM

975265 wrote:
Ok.. Looks like I touched a nerve there. I apologize. I'm still a student, and this is the first time that I've tried something at this level. I'm still in the learning process, so I was hoping that someone could point me in the right direction in order to "fix" the data.Not so much touching a nerve as simply trying to implement a very very poor, but all too common, practice. Since you are a student (which we didn't know until this post) most people will cut you some slack. However, this little exchange should now be burned into your brain as you move forward. One of the very first rules of programming is to ALWAYS use the correct data types for your data. And along with that, never ever depend on implicit type conversions - always use the proper explicit conversion functions.
And as a slight follow-on, when considering the appropriate data type, don't assume that just because we refer to a given element as a 'something number' that it is indeed a number. Telephone "numbers" are NOT numbers. U.S. Social Security "numbers" are NOT numbers. U.S. Postal Zip codes are NOT numbers. All are just character strings which, by convention, we limit to the same characters we use to represent numbers.
And since this entire discussion came up around the representation of dates, you might want to take a look at http://edstevensdba.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/nls_date_format/
Now, go forth and be a smarter programmer than your peers.
Edited by: EdStevens on Dec 6, 2012 6:12 AM

Reports 6i to 10g Migration (Value Does Not Match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'

Dear all,
I am Migrating Oracle 6i Reports to 10g. I am just compiling the 6i Reports in 10g Reports Builder and giving the
Report for Deployment after it got successfully ran in the report builder.
In one of the Report Report Query i am checking date range like below
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN :L_FRM_DTE AND :L_TO_DTE
L_FRM_DTE and L_TO_DTE input mask is MM/DD/YYYY
i got the output in report builder and as well as from the application also but after the compiled the same report
in 10g and tested in server ..
i am getting the following error in server ..
REP-546:Value does not match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'
ORA-01030:Date format picture ends before converting entire input string
REP-0091:Invalid value for parameter L_FRM_DTE
any body faced the same problem ...please help me to resolve this issue ..
I Tried Changing the Query to
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN to_date(:L_FRM_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy') AND to_date(:L_TO_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy')
but still no use because iam getting runtime error ORA-01858 NON NUMERIC CHARACTER WAS FOUND WHERE A NUMERICA CHAR WAS EXPECTED.
Thank you all for Looking into my problem..
Data Boy

Dear all i found the document related to this problem in META LINK ..The Bug no is 5597464
The base of this Bug is 4589885
It is given that
Fixed in Product Version 11.0
but when i go to oracle site ..i cant find this version for Developer suite. can anyone please help in this
there is only Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2.0.2).
Thank you all for looking into my problem.

Report S_ALR_87011964 Asset balances does not match AW01N

In march 08, useful life of one asset is reduced to 4.4 years
effective Mar 08.
Accordingly - system has revised Plan Deprn figures from march 08 to
through Dec 08 & planned book value is nil as at Dec
08(These calculationa are perfect).
Then Deprn run was executed for first quarter of 2008(Calender Year).
For this asset, Deprn posted was 19007.41 (5001.95(Jan)+5001.95(Feb)
+9003.52(Mar) & this amount matches with GL as well as Asset values in
AS03(aw01n).
Now issue is when we run report s_alr_87011964(with Current book value)
as at report date 03/31/08(Mar 08) - it returns Acq value 300117.10 & Acc deprn
200078.06 & book value 100039.04(these values are as at 01/01/08) - hence it is not taking the Deprn
figures of year 2008 - however for all other assets - this report
displays perfect info & matches with GL & AW01N.
When we run this report with Report date 05/31/08(may 08) or later - it gives
correct value.
Kindly advise as to why Asset values does not match with Asset report for this particular asset.

Hi
If you are executing the reports for previous / future years - execute them as of last day of the fiscal year
The execution for current year can have any date of the fiscal year for report execution
BR,Ajay M

[[DataDirect][ODBC SQL Server Wire Protocol driver][Microsoft SQL Server]Column name or number of supplied values does not match table definition.]

Hii ..
need help on this ..
This what I am doing ..
I am using a DATAEXPORT function to export level0 data from my essbase 11.1.2.2 to Microsoft SQL 2008 tables.
So what I did first I exported the level0 data to a flat file using DATAEXPORT and the created the SQL columns by the same in that order only in my SQL table.
When I run it fails with this error:
ODBC Layer Error: [21S01] ==> [[DataDirect][ODBC SQL Server Wire Protocol driver][Microsoft SQL Server]Column name or number of supplied values does not match table definition.]
[Tue Jul 23 18:26:07 2013]Local/dataexp/dataexp/admin@Native Directory/1209813312/Info(1021014)
ODBC Layer Error: Native Error code [213]
[Tue Jul 23 18:26:07 2013]Local/dataexp/dataexp/admin@Native Directory/1209813312/Error(1012085)
Unable to export data to SQL table [dataexp]. Check the Essbase server log and the system console to determine the cause of the problem.
[Tue Jul 23 18:26:07 2013]Local/dataexp/dataexp/admin@Native Directory/1209813312/Info(1021002)
SQL Connection is Freed
[Tue Jul 23 18:26:07 2013]Local/dataexp/dataexp/admin@Native Directory/1209813312/Warning(1080014)
Transaction [ 0x1c50001( 0x51ee7d66.0x80342 ) ] aborted due to status [1012085].
[Tue Jul 23 18:26:07 2013]Local/dataexp/dataexp/admin@Native Directory/1209813312/Info(1012579)
Total Calc Elapsed Time for [test.csc] : [1.44] seconds
=============================================================
I did a simple test on my Sample.basic application then ..
loaded the calc data to it and then used the below script to export to a flat file
//ESS_LOCALE English_UnitedStates.Latin1@Binary
SET DATAEXPORTOPTIONS
                DataExportLevel "Level0";
                DataExportOverwriteFile ON;
                DataExportColFormat OFF;
                DataExportDimHeader OFF;
FIX(
            "Jan",
            "Sales",
            "Actual"
/*DATAEXPORT "File" "," "/home/hypadmin/samtest.txt";*/
DATAEXPORT "DSN" "Abhitest" "sample" "sa" "welcome1";
ENDFIX
out put as below:
"Sales"
"100-30","California"
"Jan","Actual",145
Now In sql I created only 3 columns with name Jan/Sales/Actual and when I run this script again with comments removed .. I get the same error as what I have got in my first test case with other application ..
but when I create the columns with same name as what its in export
Sales/100-30/Califirnia/Jan/Actual
It created the new rows successfully ..
So with this I think the error which I am getting with my other application might be because of the same column issue .. but then I have created all the columns by looking at the export file only as I did in sample ..
Any idea would be helpful ..
Thanks
Abhishek
I

First make sure you add
DataExportRelationalFile ON;
to your set commands it is missing
I alwats like to also add
DataExportColHeader dimensionName;
so I am sure what dimension is getting put into the columns.
Then count the number of dimensions in your outline (exclude attribute dimensions). You need at least that many columns in your table -1 + the number of members you will be returning as columns in the export
Taking your example Sample basic has 5 dimensions
Measures
Years
Scenario
Product
Market
Since you did not specify a dataexportcolheader it took the dense dimension Scenario as the columns. Your fix statement is limiting that to one member. Doing the math
5 -1 + 1 = 5 columns in your table which is what you found works. Suppose you fixed on bothe Actual and budget in scenario then you would need 6 columns 5 -1 +2

SQL Query - The number of columns specified in "SQL Query" does not match t

I am creating new UDM for tablespace alert, below is my query,however its failing with error
SQL Query - The number of columns specified in "SQL Query" does not match the value specified in "SQL Query Output"
I selected Metric type is number
SQL Query Format : Two columns
Query:
SELECT d.tablespace_name,round(((a.bytes - NVL(f.bytes,0))*100/a.maxbytes),2)
used_pct FROM sys.dba_tablespaces d,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes, sum(greatest(maxbytes,bytes)) maxbytes from sys.dba_data_files group by tablespace_name) a,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes from sys.dba_free_space group by tablespace_name) f
WHERE d.tablespace_name = a.tablespace_name(+) AND d.tablespace_name = f.tablespace_name(+)
AND NOT (d.extent_management = 'LOCAL' AND d.contents = 'TEMPORARY');
Any clues why i am getting error.

SQL> SELECT d.tablespace_name,round(((a.bytes - NVL(f.bytes,0))*100/a.maxbytes),2) used_pct
2 FROM sys.dba_tablespaces d,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes, sum(greatest(maxbytes,bytes)) maxbytes from sys.dba_data_files group by tablespace_name) a,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes from sys.dba_free_space group by tablespace_name) f
3 WHERE d.tablespace_name = a.tablespace_name(+) AND d.tablespace_name = f.tablespace_name(+)
4 AND NOT (d.extent_management = 'LOCAL' AND d.contents = 'TEMPORARY');
TABLESPACE_NAME USED_PCT
MGMT_TABLESPACE .82
SYSAUX 1.52
UNDOTBS1 .32
RMAN .02
CORRUPT_TS 10.63
USERS 0
SYSTEM 2.26
MGMT_ECM_DEPOT_TS .04
MGMT_AD4J_TS 0

Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report

Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.

Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul

Inventory in warehouse report value does not match balance sheet account

Dear experts,
When I run the inventory in warehouse report, the value (using last purchase price) does not match the inventory finished goods account. Can you please advise why?
Thank you for any advice.
Jane

Dear Jane,
The only report for inventory to link to financial statement would be Inventory Audit Report.
All other reports are just for your convenience. They are not financial based.
Thanks,
Gordon

SQL LOADER and ORA-01861: literal does not match format string

Hi,
I've to load data through control_file(.ctl) into oracle table through sqlldr. Oracle 11g, win xp.
as soon as I use - sqlldr dss/dss control=orders.ctl I get error or nothing.
Text file that is generated after loading fails has the following error.
Record 1: Rejected - Error on table ORDERS, column O_ORDERDATE.
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string
I have checked the format of data to be loaded into Orders table is like this : *1996-01-02.*
I checked the format of data in my database by querying sysdate from dual i.e. 10-JAN-10
I thought that changing its format might solve my problem so i tried this:
SQL> alter session set nls_date_format='YYYY-MM-DD';
Session altered.
SQL> select sysdate from dual;
SYSDATE
2010-01-10but still i'm getting the same error. I've to load millions of data. how I can solve this issue.
Please suggest.
Thanks alot.
Best Regads,
Kam

Hi,
It's strange ....nobody knew it?. I think this type of load problem will be very common isn't it.... where date column data is in a different format than in the db i.e.
How to change *1996-01-02* in the Control_file to make it able to load in the table where sysdate is like this: *11-JAN-10*
Sample data to be loaded is :
1|36901|O|173665.47|1996-01-02|5-LOW|Clerk#000000951|0|nstructions sleep furiously among |
Desc Orders
O_ORDERDATE NOT NULL DATEI have tested this by creating a test table and a test control file by omitting this O_ORDERDATE and then everything was fine, data was inserted but don't know how to load this DATE also.
Also not able to understand about POSITION in the control file...?
Regards,
Kam

Output does not match data sheet as only 1 report was available for selecti

Output does not match data sheet as only 1 report was available for selection in hyperion planning.Can anyone help me in resolving this issues.Its very urgent.

You will need to provide much more detailed information before anybody can help.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

SSIS The parameterized sql statement yields metadata which does not match the main SQL statement

Hi all,
I'm getting the above error when trying to execute a custom lookup. What I'm trying to do is lookup the minimum promotional price between date ranges. The SQL executes fine in SSMS
SELECT refTable.PRICE
FROM ( SELECT MIN(PRICE) AS PRICE ,
NAME ,
ITEMRELATION ,
FROMDATE ,
TODATE
FROM [dbo].[AllCustPrices]
GROUP BY NAME ,
ITEMRELATION ,
FROMDATE ,
TODATE
) [refTable]
WHERE [refTable].[NAME] = ?
AND [refTable].[ITEMRELATION] = ?
AND ? BETWEEN [refTable].[FROMDATE]
AND [refTable].[TODATE]
but errors in SSIS?

Apologies, totally forgot i posted a question on here. I still haven't resolved this. full error text is TITLE: Package Validation Error
Package Validation Error
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Error at Data Flow Task [Lookup MIN Price [440]]: The parameterized SQL statement yields metadata which does not match the main SQL statement.
Error at Data Flow Task [SSIS.Pipeline]: "Lookup MIN Price" failed validation and returned validation status "VS_ISBROKEN".
Error at Data Flow Task [SSIS.Pipeline]: One or more component failed validation.
Error at Data Flow Task: There were errors during task validation.
(Microsoft.DataTransformationServices.VsIntegration)
BUTTONS:
OK
If I take off the MIN function and just put * SSIS is quite happy, it does not like MIN for some reason?
I'm really stumped with this... checked metadata for third parameter which is W/C Date DT_DBTIMESTAMP which is same as FROMDATE, TODATE where i'm using BETWEEN...

Report does not match sql

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for