Sales Analysis report does not match Cost of Sales Account
My client is running SAP B1 8.81 PL 6. He has set all items to standard costing method. He has discovered that the difference between the Sales Amount and the Gross Profit amount on the Sales Analysis report, which should equal the Cost of Sales for the Items, does not match the Cost of Sales G/L account on the P&L report. If you look at a sample of rows, the above difference divided by the quantity equals the standard cost of the item. There are no manual journal entries that affect the COS account for the posting period that is being analyzed. I cannot see any mathmatical difference or problem with the above analysis, nor can I find the problem. There is about an $85K difference between the reports. The Sales Amount on the Sales Analysis report matches the revenue account on the P&L to the penny. Has anyone ever compared these 2 reports? Thank you for your help.
Bill Turek
If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
See screenshot:
-Eric Alo-
B1 Financial Consultant
Similar Messages
-
Sales Analysis COS does not match the ledgers
Hi, I have run the weekly sales analysis report for week 24 and our TM comes out different to the ledger. The difference is 10k? Any idea why?
If you right click on an Invoice and choose "Gross Profit" it will give you a setting on how you want to calculate the Gross Profit for that invoice.
In the accounting point of view the "Base Price" should be "Item Cost" so that the Gross Profit will be (Net Selling Price - Item Cost = Gross Profit). This will give you the same Gross Profit amount between P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
However, SAP B1 gives the user the ability to select a different base price other than the Item Cost.
This gives the user the flexibility for the Sales Report. Example (Net Sales Price - Vendor Sales Price = Gross Profit). People do this sometimes because the item's cost fluctuates if you use FIFO or average cost and they want a uniform cost to calculate their Gross Profit.
In summary if the Base Price is not set to "Item Cost" then there will be difference in the Gross Profit between the P and L and Sales Analysis Report.
See screenshot:
-Eric Alo-
B1 Financial Consultant -
Itemization does not match cost component split
Hi,
I need your help or could you please shed some light as to how to fix .
A new Overhead was created, in order to add expenses to the pricing of the product. For it a variant of different pricing to which is used currently was created, and so for maintain a historic one of the information.
In addition, in the cost component Structure an adjustment of the configuration was carried out, this was done because the previous the cost component Structure contained 18 elements of costs, which the most of the elements were specified as fixed and variable costs, therefore the system only permitted the addition of 2 more elements (SAP only permits 20 elements of fixed and variable costs), nevertheless was necessary to create a total of 23 elements of costs. For it the previous elements have to be modified and to change some elements as variable costs, specifically the elements corresponding to the accounts of materials. using tcode OKTZ
The addition of 5 more elements of costs, corresponding to overhead elements, where the type 41 costs classes were configured from the plan of surcharge created.
After carrying out the changes and to transport them the client of production, when i execute the T-code ck13n an inconsistency in the previous pricings was generated, because the cost component Structure was modified and the the following one Nº message was showed: CK869 " Mat.XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split, the report of itemization shows different values to the reports of Costed Mutilevel BOM and of Cost Components. Additionally to the error shown by the system, also is observed that to the Cost Components report a cost in the new elements of overhead was added, even when the calculation of previous cost did not contain the determination of overhead.
In order to fix the error, I modified the cost component structure as it was before and the created another cost component structure with the required changes requested by the client specifying that it should start to be current this year. However after that change the error message nºCK869 continue: Mat. XXX in plant XXX: itemization does not match cost component split. Adding to that error message, the cost of the finished product changes with reference to the calculus of the previous product after modified the configuration and that is because the cost of the semifinished product is not being taken the values of the row material, and it is appearing with cost 0 and the only value that is taking on the matter are the costs of the activities types.If you want the message to go away then you need to mark and releasse the estimate. However, there is no requirement that you do this. The message you are getting is an informational message only. You can continue without re-costing the item. If you do re-cost the material the new cost estimate will reflect and changes you've made to the components, so there is a good chance you will get a different value with the new estimate. So if that's ok, go ahead and mark and release the new estimate.
-
Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account
Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
JaneWhen you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia -
Investment order reporting does not match with AM
Hello,
We are exectuing two reports 1) internal order report( for investment order) and asset history sheet.
Both the report figures should match. but due to some reason the internal order report shows less value than asset history sheet.
What can be the possible reason for the differences.
BR,
ZulfikarHi
Check whether the sales order creation date and actually when you created the delivery ? if say u created the sales order yesterday with yesterday date as delivery date and carried out delivery process to day means. The delivery date in the delivery process will be today date in that case delivery date wont match with sales order. This is one case like that so many cases are there.
Material might not be confirmed etc....
Regards,
Mullai -
i am trying to generate a simple report of customer count per request id from a single table
i created a request id group and a formula that counts the customer id in the table
when i run the report the sql is correct and will generate the counts i want if i run it against my db directly, bu the report shows the total customer count for each request id.
i have the 'perform grouping on server' checked in both the 'options...' and 'report options...'
thanks in advanceMy problem really is that the report results don't match the sql.. i don't know why this is. apparently CR is doing something with the results after they come back from the server even though i have group on server turned on.
i got around the problem by qualifying the count on the request_id. i normally would not expect to have to do this, but it worked
count(subscriber_nr, request_id)
hopefully this will work when i have multiple group levels, which is where i am headed ultimately.
thanks for your efforts -
SQL Injection analysis report does not work.
I have tried to run the SQL Injection report (Home|Utilities|Object Reports Security|QL Injection but it comes up with the following message.
"SQL Injection analysis is not supported with your current database version. It is only available for Oracle release 10.2 or higher."
I have tried this as both an ordinary user and as system, on both Windows XP and LinuxThis is a bug in the XE Beta. The SQL Injection Analysis will not be accessible for XE production.
Joel -
Sales Analysis Report for Batch Numbers
I am currently having an issue with Batch numbers and sales analysis report item wise. If the goods are delivered it does not show the quantity in the report. is there a way to make the quantites show. Open delivery notes show the quantity in the report. Could the reason be that once the delivery note is closed the quantity does not show in the report.????
Dear Mr Shah,
If I understood correctly, you are saying that there is no issue in adding the document with the batch but it is not shown in the Sales Analysis report?
The Sales Analysis report does not show information regarding the quantity because it focuses on the value of the document.
In order to have an overview on the trasactions related to the batches please use the Batch Number Transaction Report under Inventory - Inventory report.
Regards,
Marcella Rivi
SAP Business One Forums Team -
Sales analysis report and P&L match in SAP b1
Dear All,
I am running Sales Analysis report customerwise and item wise where the total of Sales Amount is matching with Revenue amount in profit and loss report for the month April 2011 only.
But after that these reports are not matchinhg. Please guide in this regard.
There are some items having valuation method standard, FIFo and moving average.
Regards
Aarati KollurDear Jitin,
Thanks for quick reply,
i run the report for item for the April 2011 where total matchs with revenue even there are some service type of A/R Invoices.
Does sales analysis report consider service type of document in both customer wise and item wise.
Regards
Aarati. Kollur -
Cost Center does not match with the profit center
Hi Gurus,
Can you resolve my issue?
"Cost center does not match the respective profit center of the sales document for freight revenue - Doc Type: RV ( Billing Doc Transfer) Normal Document"
I request you to all, kindly solve my issue.
Thanks with Regards,
BalaIt appears that you have assigned a cost center to freight cost element and the profit center assigned to the cost center is different from the one derived by the document. As result this message.
Check the derivation rule for profit center
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar -
The report MC+E does not match with F.01
Dear Friends,
The report MC+E does not match with F.01 and moreover it does not indicate the domestic sales.It only captures export sales.
Will you please tell me why it is happenning?
Thank you.
Sadanand.Mohammed, are you able to create a brand new report using this same database source.
If that works then you know you have the proper drivers for the ODBC connection. Another
way to test this is to use Excel, create a database connection in Excel, to the ODBC table,
and see if you can pull data. You may need to update your ODBC drivers. If you are able
to pull data in your new report, try adding the other database to it, and see if the error returns.
I am on CR XI, so, I can't be much more help. -
Reports 6i to 10g Migration (Value Does Not Match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'
Dear all,
I am Migrating Oracle 6i Reports to 10g. I am just compiling the 6i Reports in 10g Reports Builder and giving the
Report for Deployment after it got successfully ran in the report builder.
In one of the Report Report Query i am checking date range like below
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN :L_FRM_DTE AND :L_TO_DTE
L_FRM_DTE and L_TO_DTE input mask is MM/DD/YYYY
i got the output in report builder and as well as from the application also but after the compiled the same report
in 10g and tested in server ..
i am getting the following error in server ..
REP-546:Value does not match mask 'MM/DD/YYYY'
ORA-01030:Date format picture ends before converting entire input string
REP-0091:Invalid value for parameter L_FRM_DTE
any body faced the same problem ...please help me to resolve this issue ..
I Tried Changing the Query to
WHERE lov_dte BETWEEN to_date(:L_FRM_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy') AND to_date(:L_TO_DTE,'mm/dd/yyyy')
but still no use because iam getting runtime error ORA-01858 NON NUMERIC CHARACTER WAS FOUND WHERE A NUMERICA CHAR WAS EXPECTED.
Thank you all for Looking into my problem..
Data BoyDear all i found the document related to this problem in META LINK ..The Bug no is 5597464
The base of this Bug is 4589885
It is given that
Fixed in Product Version 11.0
but when i go to oracle site ..i cant find this version for Developer suite. can anyone please help in this
there is only Oracle Developer Suite 10g (10.1.2.0.2).
Thank you all for looking into my problem. -
Report S_ALR_87011964 Asset balances does not match AW01N
In march 08, useful life of one asset is reduced to 4.4 years
effective Mar 08.
Accordingly - system has revised Plan Deprn figures from march 08 to
through Dec 08 & planned book value is nil as at Dec
08(These calculationa are perfect).
Then Deprn run was executed for first quarter of 2008(Calender Year).
For this asset, Deprn posted was 19007.41 (5001.95(Jan)+5001.95(Feb)
+9003.52(Mar) & this amount matches with GL as well as Asset values in
AS03(aw01n).
Now issue is when we run report s_alr_87011964(with Current book value)
as at report date 03/31/08(Mar 08) - it returns Acq value 300117.10 & Acc deprn
200078.06 & book value 100039.04(these values are as at 01/01/08) - hence it is not taking the Deprn
figures of year 2008 - however for all other assets - this report
displays perfect info & matches with GL & AW01N.
When we run this report with Report date 05/31/08(may 08) or later - it gives
correct value.
Kindly advise as to why Asset values does not match with Asset report for this particular asset.Hi
If you are executing the reports for previous / future years - execute them as of last day of the fiscal year
The execution for current year can have any date of the fiscal year for report execution
BR,Ajay M -
Accounts Payable Reconciliation Account does not match with sap report
Hello Folks,
I have problem with AP reconciliation account, that the balances in FS10N for a particular Company Code for particular reconciliation account balance do not match with the report run to show the vendor balances in local currency (report tcode F.98). Balance does not match for last posting period of the FY.
I have tried looking all the vendors in that particular GL recon account and ran the report, but still it i wast able to find out anything. May be Special GL transaction posting be there, but how to check that is there any spl gl transaction it there in the recon account.
I this to be solved by tonight, all the inputs will be very much appreciated and point will be assigned for sure.
Thanks you all.Hi,
In the report you have to G/L accounts where you can select on:
The reconsilation account form the Vendor
The G/L account where to posting is created on.
It is possible that there are differences when you have change the reconsilation account form the Vendor.
The old posting are on the old and new on the nwe account. Perhaps you mis some Special G/L Indicators
It is possible that values are changed when you run the reports
Paul -
Inventory in warehouse report value does not match balance sheet account
Dear experts,
When I run the inventory in warehouse report, the value (using last purchase price) does not match the inventory finished goods account. Can you please advise why?
Thank you for any advice.
JaneDear Jane,
The only report for inventory to link to financial statement would be Inventory Audit Report.
All other reports are just for your convenience. They are not financial based.
Thanks,
Gordon
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to change Page Text in Book Module?
I am in the process of creating a 158 page photo book to be printed by Blub. I have created many other Blurb books using their BookSmart software. This is my first attempt using the Lightroom Book Module. My problem is I would like the change the d
-
SAPScript graphic not printing
Hi Folks I have a problem in a 3.1i system (yes that's right 3.1i - ah those were the days...I remember when..etc). I have changed a SAPScript layout (just the contents of a text element in the main window) and this works fine. However something is n
-
Hello All, In one environment, I have two networks: private and public. I have one machine with two network interfaces (above one) running databases 9.0.1.0 and 8.1.7.4. If I want that the 8.1.7.4 database should be accessible only by the users worki
-
How can I delite copies in easy way from "Photo", there are about 4-5 copies each of 3500 pictures! ( macbook )
-
My sequence markers are not been saved
I have a new Imac Processor 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 Memory 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2048 MB I installed Adobe Premier CC and rum the lates updates. After I create multiples annotations markers in each clip, the progra