Report on Service Contracts Authoring header level only

Created a Discoverer report that returns most of the header level data for Service Contracts Authoring. Issue is that for Summary/Parties it is returning all contacts. I want to see if I can limit the return to what the user is seeing at the application level (Role, Name, Email etc...) for the Contacts. I have found articles that suggest main line is what I want to return but had no luck. I have tried what I thought would be other unique identifiers from the okc_contacts_v, okx_party_contact_v, but the returns for each contact were identical. Thanks for any input on this subject.

Hi,
Try to figure what security rule the application uses.
you need to look at the view that lies behind the application screen.
To do that you need to change the profile "Hide Diagnostics menu entry" for your user to: No using sysadmin.
Then go to the application screen where you see the needed data and go to Help->diagnostics->Examine.
enter password for APPS.
Then chose in "Block" the SYSTEM and in "Field" Chose "Last Query".
You'll get the sql behind the last query you made in the screen.
Copy it to the SQL tool and start drilling into the view/s.
Try to find the security applied in the sql and use the same in your query.
At the end of this process you'll get the same security in your view as in the application.

Similar Messages

Issue in using custom discount condition type in pricing agreement at Service Contract line item level

Hello
We are facing an issue while using a Z discount condition type in price agreement at service contract line item level.
A Z Condition type has been created in ECC and assigned to the pricing procedure. This pricing procedure is downloaded in CRM and determined in the service contract.
A condition maintenance group using this Z condition type is created in CRM and assigned to service contract item category.
Condition records are created in CRM for this condition type/condition maintenance group for specific products along with sales org and discount percentage.
But when the price agreement(using this condition type) is used at the item level of a service contract, the system throws errors (related to product/unit of measure and sales org, even though no issues seem to be there)and thus the price agreement is not allowed to be used.
If anyone has worked on such kind of scenario, please get in touch, I will share more details for the same.
Regards
Ankit Arora

Dear Ankit,
Once the pricing procedure is downloaded, please maintain the document pricing procedure at service contract header level, and maintain the customer pricing procedure at business partner sales area billing data.
In spro, maintain the pricing procedure for the combination of sales area, document pricing procedure, customer pricing procedure.
Please crosscheck whether the condition table is active or not.
Regards,
Maddy

Surcharge at the header level only to the customer in the sales document

Hi guys,
I have requirement to charge the surcharge at the header level only to the customer in the sales document, the condition type as well as the value should not be distributed to item level
I have marked the condition as header. But still the value is copied to the item as well,
If I mark the condition as Group condition, then it distributes the total value to each item in the document according to Qty
Is there any other way, I could set up through config,
Regards,
Rao.

Hi,
In T.Code VTFL, check what is maintained for field Pricing Type. If it is B then change it to G or depending on your business select a suitable value.
This should resolve your issue. Let me know in-case the issue still persisits.
Regards,
Rohan Gudavalli

Why release strategies for PO at header level only

We have release strategy for Purchase Requisitions and Purchasing documents like PO, Contract and SA.
In case of PREQ we have a choose for either item level release or header level release, whereas in case of PO, Contract and SA only header level release is possible.
My question is why SAP has provided only the header level Release Strategy for PO, Contract and SA? I wan to know the reason and logic behind this.

Hi,
For PR's, there is no header level data. Becuause vendor number is optional since it is internal document from the user dep. to pur org. That's why, vendor number fields is at item level in the source of supply screen. But this is optional field.
That's why, you can release PR line items one by one or all at a time.
If you are releasing all line items at a time, need header level release.
If you release line item by line item, need item level release.
But in the case PO/Contract/SA, these are final reference documents and sending to the vendor as external documents.
That's vendor number is at header level field and line item in the PO are related to the single vendor.
That's why u cann't release line item by item, i.e., item level release.
You can relase all the items in the PO or u can reject entire PO, not a single line item.
That's why, only header level release is possible for the PO/Contract/SA.
Regards
KRK

To get PO number against invoices at header level only

hi
I have this query to retireve payments against invoices
SELECT ai.gl_date, aca.amount paymentamount, aca.bank_account_name,aca.check_number,aca.DOC_SEQUENCE_VALUE voucher_num,
       aca.payment_method_lookup_code, aca.vendor_name suppliername,ai.base_amount functional_amount,   pha.segment1 po_num,
       aca.check_date paymentdate, aida.period_name, aida.creation_date
FROM ap_invoices_all ai,
       ap_vendors_v avv,
       ap_invoice_payments_all aipa,
       ap_checks_all aca,
       ap_invoice_distributions_all aida,
       po_distributions_all pda,
       po_headers_all pha,
         HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_V hrov
WHERE ai.vendor_id = avv.vendor_id
   AND aca.vendor_id = ai.vendor_id
   AND aipa.check_id = aca.check_id
   AND aipa.invoice_id = ai.invoice_id
   AND ai.invoice_id = aida.invoice_id
   ANd pda.po_distribution_id=aida.po_distribution_id(+)
   AND pda.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id(+)
   AND pda.destination_organization_id=hrov.organization_id
    and aca.STATUS_LOOKUP_CODE !='VOIDED'
     and aca.DOC_SEQUENCE_VALUE='212366'
order by to_char(ai.gl_date,'MM')
18 records are shown
for aca.doc_sequence_value='212244 no rows returned
i found the reason as to this 212244 has no PO number
so i had to rewrite the query using ANSI JOINS
SELECT ai.gl_date, aca.amount paymentamount, aca.bank_account_name,aca.check_number,aca.DOC_SEQUENCE_VALUE voucher_num,
       aca.payment_method_lookup_code, aca.vendor_name suppliername,ai.base_amount functional_amount,   pha.segment1 po_num,
       aca.check_date paymentdate, aida.period_name, aida.creation_date
FROM ap_invoices_all ai
     join ap_vendors_v avv on(ai.vendor_id = avv.vendor_id)
      join ap_invoice_payments_all aipa on (aipa.invoice_id = ai.invoice_id)
      join ap_checks_all aca on ( aipa.check_id = aca.check_id and aipa.invoice_id = ai.invoice_id)
       join ap_invoice_distributions_all aida on ( ai.invoice_id = aida.invoice_id)
    left join po_distributions_all pda on (pda.po_distribution_id=aida.po_distribution_id)
      left join po_headers_all pha on( pda.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id)
        left join HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_V hrov on (pda.destination_organization_id=hrov.organization_id)
    where aca.STATUS_LOOKUP_CODE !='VOIDED'
     and aca.DOC_SEQUENCE_VALUE='212366'
order by to_char(ai.gl_date,'MM')
now i get the correct data for 212244
but when i run the same query for 212366 i get 19 records as one invoice in this 076998 has 3 line items and one line item dont have PO
BUT the requirement is to get only PO information at the header level not line levelkindly guide
thanking in advance

When you need only PO numbers, link only the 3 tables to make your query simpler.
ap_invoice_distributions_all aida,
po_distributions_all pda,
po_headers_all poh
Only po based invoices will be selected for these tables

Aggregating on header-level only

Hi experts,
I'm facing the following scenario:
I've got an infoprovider which contains item-level keyfigures.
The correspoding headers have keyfigures which cannot be disaggregated to the items.
It would not be a problem to provide a header-level infoprovider,
and an item-level infoprovider, but I cannot find a way to bring both sources together
in the same query.
A concrete example:
The header-level infoprovider contains the confirmed quantity of an production-order.
The item-level infoprovider contains the component-materials used by this prod-order and it's quantity.
In the target report I'd like to see the confirmed quantity of a prod-order as well as the components-level.
The problem is, that if I provide the prod-order-quantity on the item-level, that they will be aggregated multiple-times (according to the number of components used by a prod-order).
Example:
Data:
ProdOrder     Component     Conf.Qty     CompQty
111     X     10     3
111     Y     10     2
112     X     10     1
Wanted result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     10     5
112     10     1
Actual result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     20     5
112     10     1
Is there any way to solve that?
I'm still fighting with the idea of exception-aggregation, but it seems as if I had not understood the concept yet.
Best regards,
Marco

Hi AL,
that's correct, and works quite good as long as I have got the prod.order in my drilldown.
What I unfortunately did not describe: I need the "first value" of each prod-order-component cummlulated...
So to correct my initial need:
Wanted result, when aggregated on ProdOrder-Level:
111     10     5
112     10     1
Wanted result, when aggregated completly:
20     6
In the way you described, I'll get
10 6
because always the "first value" is displayed and no summation is done anymore (for that keyfigure)

Hyperion Reports 7.2.5 -generating base level only of selected Organisation

Hi,
Edit - reposted in correction forum, please ignore
Hopefully this is the right place to ask about Hyperion reports - 7.2.5
I'm trying to design a report and need a nudge in the right direction...
The user should select their division and the reports should then display only the base level children of the selected division.
I've tried selecting Functions -
children of current pov for organisation - which gives the next level of the selected org
descendants of current pov - gives all levels below the selected org. (therefore duplicating parent/child levels)
Bottom of Hierarchy - gives all the base level of the whole organisation (rather than just the one selected)
Lists - level 0, organisation - as above, gives level 0 of the entire org
Someone tell me its possible to just get the level 0 of the current pov organisation...it must be something obvious I'm missing!
thanks
Amit
Edited by: user10084264 on 23-Sep-2009 04:05

Hi,
I am working on the same issue here. I tired to use
(level o of Account) Union (descenants of Corp Cost), but the result are still not " level o of Corp cost".
How to get " level o of Corp cost", Corp Cost is one member under "Account" dimension.
Thanks!

Want to know the sale order report for Delivery bclok at header level

Dear,
i would like to know some reports
1). I would like to know is ther any SAP std report is available for Sale order if Blocked for delivery(VBAK-LIFSK)??
2). is ther any report for knowing the Sale order if header/item text is maintained??
Pl advice if any std report is available.
Thanks in advance

Dear Pradyumna,
Thanks for your reply, I did't find any Header r item text in the report.
Pl suggest is there any other report is availble???
Thanks in adv.

Discount value not updating at contract header level

Dear Friends
I am facing problem of updating discount value at contract header level. The scenario is u2026. my client used to provide certain service to their customer. For that they maintain quantity contract & bill them as per billing plan. When customer avail three or more services they get 10% extra discount. Now the problem is after continue for some days if some customer wants to drop one item we are cancelling the line item by assigning proper cancellation procedure but the system is not reversing the 10% discount.
Example u2013
Contract valid for 1st Jan 2009 to 31st Dec 2010(Value for each service = 10)
(Total no of item-3)
(Discount-10%)
Here bill value for each month is 10x3-(30x0.10) =27
At the month of march 2009 customer decided to drop for one item so hence forth the bill value should be 10x2=20
But the system is calculating 10x2-(20x0.10)=18
We need to update the value at contract header level only to satisfy some CRM functionality.
Please suggest how to solve this issue

Hi,
If that is item condition then you can not change it at header level
check in M/06 make it at header level in change which can be made tab
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Contract sign date field hide at header level

Hi,
My client want to disable contract sign date at header level only not at item level in the contract.I tried transanction variant but it is disabling both side header as well as item level.Kindly suggest me.User should only give input at item level only.

So are we... The BAPI BAPI_CONTRACT_CREATE has the following importing parameters:
HEADER     TYPE     BAPIMEOUTHEADER
HEADERX     TYPE     BAPIMEOUTHEADERX
VENDOR_ADDRESS     TYPE     BAPIMEOUTADDRVENDOR
TESTRUN     TYPE     BAPIFLAG-BAPIFLAG
TECHNICAL_DATA     TYPE     BAPIMEOUTTECH
Change the HEADER and HEADERX parameters as I have indicated in my first post.
Regards,
John.

To be able to report by business area at a header level

Business area reporting at a header level in Procurement/AP Subject Areas
At present client is doing a large number of manual lookups in Excel to add Business area detail to certain OBI procurement reports. Reasons for why we are having to do this includes that the report is written at a header level but the business area detail is stored at a distribution level or the document has no distribution lines.
What client would therefore like is for us to devise solutions that would allow us to include the business area detail. Possible solutions that I can think of include doing a join between the employee name, preparer name and requestor name to the HR business area detail, and the way that the ‘Procurement and Spend - Employee Spend’ joins the employee name and approver name to the business area fields maybe something that you can review as a solution.
I am hoping that you can come up with a number of solutions which we can then explore in further detail.
The key subject area that we would like this business area detail to be available in is the ‘Financials - AP Transactions’ area but if would certainly be beneficial to have in the ‘Procurement and Spend - Purchase Orders’ and ‘Procurement and Spend - Purchase Requisitions’ subject areas as well if it is feasible.
Can any plz.. guide the possible soultions we can do with this CR
Edited by: user13050518 on May 11, 2010 7:40 AM

Bonjour,
Je suppose vu votre prénom que vous parlez français lol bien que l'anglais ne me pose pas de problème.
En fait, il s'agit de plusieurs factures (avec différentes business area) pour un même fournisseur.
Au moment de la F110, le système comptabilise le paiement via une seule pièce mais avec plusieurs postes (un par business area) et la contrepartie le compte banque.
La case n'est pas cochée pour le champ T001-XGSBE donc je ne pense pqs que le problème provienne de là.
Cdlt

Clear IDOC creation when only header level changes are made ME22N.

Hi All,
when the PO is on changed in the header level only(for example header texts and header code) and when we execute RSNAST00 one BADI getts triggered which checks if the Item category is 9 and badi will clear the IDOC creation.
If the PO item category is = 9, the IDOC must not be created. This badi works fine if the changes are made at
1)at Item level
2)both header level and Item level
In case of 1 and 2 we have both header segment E1EDK01 and item segments E1EDP01.As a result it checks for the item category in the item segment.so idoc is not created.
3)BADI is not working when the changes are made at the header level only. The IDOC is getting created even though the PO has the item category as 9.
I found in this case only header segments are availble while debugging and the item segments are not there to check the condition for the item category.
Please any one can suggest me possible solutions to clear idoc creation when only header level changes are made ME22N.
The BADI used is as below.
DATA : lwa_data TYPE edidd.
DATA : lw_dp01 TYPE e1edp01.
DATA : lwa_control TYPE edidc.
CHECK idoc_control-rcvprn = '3PL' AND idoc_control-idoctp = 'ORDERS05'.
LOOP AT idoc_data INTO lwa_data.
    IF lwa_data-segnam = 'E1EDP01'.
      lw_dp01 = lwa_data-sdata.
      IF lw_dp01-pstyp = '9'.
        CLEAR create_idoc.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHO
Thanks in advance.

Hi all,
Is there any way that I can get the item category details when Only header level changes are made to the PO in ME22N and only header segments are available in the IDOC.
Is this possible:- Fetch the po number and item category details from ekpo table that matches with the header segment po number and then check for item category value to clear the idoc creation?
Any information is helpfull.
Edited by: Selina.selk on Nov 20, 2009 1:39 PM
Edited by: Selina.selk on Nov 20, 2009 2:49 PM

Service Contract Determination for material product

Hello,
I am trying to implement service contract determination for a complaint and I observe that the service contract gets determined at the complaint item level only when I add a service type product at the item level and not when I add a product of material type. Is this a system limitation that a service contract can be determined only for a service product or am I missing some configuration? Has anyone else faced a similiar issue?
Thanks,
Divya.

hi divya
the contract get determined even after adding product of type material
1.create a srv contract (sc)
2.add product of type material
3. release the contract and save it (note the no.)
4.create a trnx complaint(crmc) maintain the setting fr contract determinition(F)
5.put the product in trnx and ur contract will get determined
see if it suffice ur requirement
"reward points if u find useful"

Doubt - Service Contract - Pricing - "Retain Manual conditions" in SAPUI

Hi,
For service contract, at header pricing level, there is a button, "RETAIN MANUAL CONDITION". What is the purpose of this button?
what ever the result it gives after clicking on this button, I should get it through programatically.
Could you please help me out with any FM for this purpose..
Thanks,
Sandeep

Hi,
RETAIN MANUAL CONDITION button reprices the order keeping the manual conditions intact.
regards,
Chait

Two billing Planin a single service contract

Dear All,
Please suggest how can I assign two billing plan for a service material Monthly and Yearly with different charge head
Rg
Ajit

Hi ajit
I think you can assign billing plans at item level and header level only
for item level you can configure in the item category details
for header level you can configure in the sales doc type details
Regards
Srinath

Report on Service Contracts Authoring header level only

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for