Request: Make Keyword 'function' Optional for Parameterless/Void Functions

Question

Say I have function
doJob (startThis:function(), whenDone:function()) When I am using this function doJob(), it would be nice to be able to do
doJob( {code_to_do_something}, {code_to_do_something});
// instead of
doJob( function(){code_to_do_something}, function(){code_to_do_something});Or be able to define a parameterless void function as
var hello = {println ("Hello")}; and invoke that function using form
hello();This would eliminate some verbosity introduced by the function keyword.

Answer 1

@PhiLho
Yes, to you just 10 character is not a big deal. But to the rest of us who have to keep repeating those 10 chars over and over in larger applications it does become a big deal.
Your example of ar foo = {fooCall("Stuff"}; is misplaced. Why would you trap a non-void function call inside a void fn? If fooCall returns something then obviously the compiler would try to return via the calling function and this is a problem (as you point out) regardless of what the syntax is.
My suggestion is more toward bringing sensible syntax shortcut/sugar in the language.