Requesting 64-bit Shell Extension DLL

Adobe support website states that Adobe Acrobat Pro is compatible with 64-bit versions of Windows. I am using Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit and Acrobat X Pro, and I am missing the PDF tab from the file properties dialog box. This is because Explorer is a 64-bit program (since it is running on Windows Vista 64-bit). But if I do the same within the Open dialog box in Acrobat Pro I can see the PDF tab.
In Windows Explorer:
Open Windows Explorer (Win+E)
Navigate to Desktop.
Right click on a PDF file.
Click Properties.
See fi you can see the PDF tab in the dialog box that appears. If you are on 64-bit Windows Vista (maybe even Windows 7) you will not see this option.
However, in Adobe Acrobat X Pro:
Open Acrobat X Pro.
Click File, then Open (Ctrl+O).
Navigate to Desktop.
Right click on a PDF file.
Click Properties.
Now you should be able to see the PDF tab in the file properties dialog box. Why it appears in Acrobat Pro but not when viewing the same dialog box from Explorer is because Acrobat Pro is a 32-bit software.
The change I want to see is that the PDF tab will be visible, regardless of if you are viewing it from within the Open dialog box in Acrobat Pro or from Window Explorer. You need to either provide a fully functional and full featured 64-bit version of Acrobat Pro, or you need to provide a working 64-bit Shell Extension for compatibility with 64-bit Windows and 64-bit Explorer, and keep Acrobat Pro as 32-bit only.

JGreatness,
I could tell you, but I'd rather put the pressure on Oracle to deliver a 21st Century product. If you pay for maintenance, then you can log in and place an enhancement request.
Now, if you don't care about support, then you can run the 32-bit application on Windows 2008R2 with a little tweaking. The main issue is with the printing to PDF. You need a couple of 64-bit DLL files for the Amyuni PDF printer. The files and associated installation instructions used to be available in the knowledgebase, but were later pulled.
The best you can do for now and still receive support is stick with 32-bit and maximize your application and Java memory settings. I don't think the WebLogic option will gain you anything, as the 'tested configurations' document only lists 32-bit Windows as the host operating system, regardless if you use JBOSS or WebLogic. Speculating, I would say the main issue revolves around 64-bit Java, not the operating system or web application. If Oracle is going to continue to utilize the JDK and Java elements and deliver a 64-bit product, then they will have to convert all Java objects to 64-bit. Correct me if I'm wrong. Also, the executable service file they provide is 32-bit and would need to be converted.
Sadly, they only provide support for what was, at one time, the most common platform among many CM shops. We need more options, but that increases Oracle's development and support costs. I would prefer to lose the Microsoft Office dependency for letter templates and log exports and run the whole thing on 64-bit Linux, but we can't have everything.
As noted in a previous post, I suppose you could go ahead and get the DLL's via a purchase from Amyuni.
I don't know if we could post the DLL's and instructions on the Yahoo message board.

Similar Messages

Saved files as .PSD now they are "Windows Shell Common Dll" and won't open?

I am having a problem with opening some files in Photoshop. I am using Photoshop CS5.1 Extended (Version 12.1) and have Windows 7 64 bit SP1 OS.
I am trying to open a few templates I made in PhotoShop for a client and they worked fine when I used them 3 weeks ago. All were saved as .psd documents. Now when I go to open them they no longer have the PS icon (to show they would be opened by PhotoShop). When I try to open them I get "Could not complete your request because it is not the right type of document." I have had this problem once before but it is confusing to me because 2 of the other similar .psd files I saved at the same timeframe(separate elements for the temlate) are perfectly fine, only the ones I need do not want to open.
I checked file properties and it claims these files are now Windows Shell Common Dll files. Any ideas?

I guess you were able to open them in photoshop with open as.
In the future you should probably try to avoid using periods in the image file names other than for the file type extension.
You could use - or_ in place of the periods as in VotePedia Invoice 1_5_13 or VotePedia Invoice 1-5-13
Also, as Noel suggested, going into Control Panel>Appearace and Personalization>Folder Options>View
and unchecking Hide extensions for known file types will help as well.

Acrobat X Shell Extension Causes Explore to Crash on Right Click

Whenever user right clicks on a folder exepler.exe hangs.
I isolated the problem using ShellView, to an Adobe shell extension named Acrobat Elements Context Menu.
Disabling the following shell extension resolves the issue ContextMenu64.dll version 10.1.4
Computer OS Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit SP1
How Do I resolve this?

Good post.
Viewers will find ShellExView here.
Ramesh explains its application here.
-Jerry

Status of Windows Shell Extensions Support

Hi,
Are Windows Explorer Shell Extensions viable (Column Extensions in particular)? If so, is C++/ATL the best approach?
All the article/docs I search seem to be 5-10 years old, and it appears .NET shell extensions are not recommended by Microsoft. I have been testing some .NET shell extensions with quite a bit of difficulty.
warren

Are Windows Explorer Shell Extensions viable (Column Extensions in particular)?
I don't think column extensions have been viable since XP.
All the article/docs I search seem to be 5-10 years old, and it appears .NET shell extensions are not recommended by Microsoft.
Different camps at MS have said different things, especially when .Net
4 came out, but I think the consensus is that it's not recommended to
do shell extensions in .NET - however, people still do them! :(
Dave

Default program - Crypto Shell Extensions

Is it possible to associate Crypto Shell extension as default program for files like aaa.XXX ?
Has Crypto Shell extension any executables? I see that the process is running under rundll32.exe cryptext.dll
Thanx
Tomas

Hi,
It couldn't be opened with Crypto Shell Extension. Even through you associate with this type, it would display error like this:
You could consider to convert it to valid other type file, like .cer. it would be like this:
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support

Windows shell extension / explorer extions

Hi,
I'm getting frustrated with an explorer plugin that lets me view images and their thumbnails within Windows Explorer. If I was to write something myself, where should I begin. I have a few tabs open on 'writing shell extensions' [2002], registering shell
extension handlers [C lang], etc. Of particular note is 'EZShellExtensions.net v2013' But I'm not sure what the situation is in 2014 with writing a custom thumbnail / image viewer.
I would prefer C#, but I've been working with C++ a bit lately (hopefully getting a bit better at using it) so if that were the preferable approach, I could probably tackle it.
I guess I was concerned that a lot of the material I'm seeing is quite old and I'm yet to find a recent article on writing extensions.
Thanks for any advice.

The overall documentation root is
here. If you're not familiar with implementing COM interfaces, I can see how it could be a bit daunting to get started. If you're open to C++, if you make an ATL project, you can add a class that has a lot of the support built in already
for you. Click on Add Class, Select ATL->ATL Simple Object, give it a name, click next, and you'll be at the File Type Handler Options screen. You can choose to make a preview handler, thumbnail handler, or search handler; the wizard will generate
the necessary skeleton code for you.
WinSDK Support Team Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/winsdk/

Gnome shell extensions issues since 3.2 release...

I may be a little early in the game here but I figured I would just mention that I'm having issues with pretty much all the cool extensions I had installed prior to 3.2. I was wondering if anyone else was having similar issues. I changed 3.0 to 3.2 in the metadata.js file to no avail, they are still unusable. Was there any other changes that needed to be made?
The ones I cared the most about are:
system monitor (the cool one in the aur, not the one in repo)
weather
a11y (i know there is a hack, but I'd prefer a extension... or just an option to be able to remove the dang universal access icon period)
frippery (which are a bunch of different ones such as the apps button, quick launch, and such)
Also all my themes are a bit messed up... so what was the biggest changes in 3.2 besides the transparency finally working in the terminal?
I still like gnome 3 and know sometimes you have to take steps back to go forward...

wonder wrote:who cares about extensions. they are unsupported by upstream
Well i care about extensions, since i can not login into gnome after updating to 3.2.
Maybe i didnt spend hours on fixing the problems, but is this the sence it is supposed to be?
The extensions were disabled by default, after the error message came, and it didnt do anything.
Then i moved the extensions out of /usr/share/gnome-shell, to make it work temporarily.
What happened? Only one extension left that made problems: gnome-shell-theme-selector.
Does anybody how to switch this off? Or something, that can login again?
Edit:
i found the info again, that this theme-selector is in ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions
I moved the extension one directory higher. And now in this error message window it is said that i should re-login,
but there is nothing said about any extension any more.
Last edited by Archoid Billy (2011-10-02 15:58:31)

Error while running User Profile Import - Stopped-extension-dll-load

Hi guys,
I'm receiving below error message in event viewer while running user profile import for the first time with event ID 6166:
The management agent "MOSS-" failed on run profile "MOSS_EXPORT_". The run step stopped because a configured extension for this management agent could not be loaded.
User Action
Verify that the extension is located in the Extensions directory. If the extension is present, confirm that the version of the .NET framework that can run the extension is installed on the server and that a supportedRuntimes entry in the configuration
files specifies that version. The synchronization engine will not be able to load an extension that is built with a newer version of the .NET framework than the version of the .NET runtime it is hosting.
At the same time , in miisclient "stopped-extension-dll-load" message for MOSS_EXPORT,MOSS_FULLSYNC, MOSS_DELTASYNC. Can any help to let me understand what will be causing this issue?
Farm version: 14.0.6137.5000

Hi Sarath,
For this issue, I recommend verify the things below:
Check if the connection name of the Synchronization Connections created in User Profile Service Application has more than 55 characters. If yes, please rename the connection with less than or equal to 55 characters.
Check if the length of the full path to the dll called “Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ManagementAgent” is
greater than 160. If yes, then we can move the extension Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.ManagementAgent.dll to the folder c:\windows\assembly\GAC_MSIL and then do an IISRESET.
If above cannot work, please check ULS log for more detailed error message.
Best regards,
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

FIM 2010 Sync not running with status "Stopped-extension-dll-exception"

we are getting the following error for all our extensions when trying to run the Sync Operations. All extensions have similar errors with event ID 6159 generated in the application event log. They all started occurring after I deleted a attribute flow
rule in one of the agents. This is happening in Production and are facing lot of other issues because of this.
The management agent "Peoplesoft" failed on run profile "Full Import Full Synch" because of a problem with the initialize method on the extension object. The extension dll is "PeoplesoftExtension.dll" and the stack trace is:
Microsoft.MetadirectoryServices.UnexpectedDataException: String or binary data would be truncated.
The statement has been terminated.
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.ExtFunctions.RunSQLCommand(String commandstring)
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.ExtFunctions.AddSentEmailsRecord(String sAMAccountName, String MessageSubject, String MessageBody, Int16 DelayDays)
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.ExtFunctions.CheckDoNotDisableInactiveGroup()
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.ExtFunctions.LoadConfigSettings()
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.ExtFunctions.InitializeCommon()
   at Mms_ManagementAgent_PeoplesoftExtension.MAExtensionObject.Initialize()
Please advise on how to fix this as I have no clue where to start and am new to FIM.
Only Full Import(Staging ONLY) is successful.

The error message you are getting is talking about data getting truncated. Any change that you had a data change alongside your other changes and now the length of data in one or more of your attributes is longer than it was?
I suspect that since you are new to FIM, something else has changed that you don't realize (beyond just the deletion of the one sync rule), but...
If truly the only thing that changed was a deletion of a flow rule, is there any chance that either of the following could have happened:
With the deletion of a flow rule the corresponding data is no longer going through the sync engine. Could there be some logic that due to precedence, is now using a different value, and this different value is too long for some other piece of logic.
With the deletion of a flow rule the corresponding data is no longer going through the sync engine. With this value missing, some extension logic is making a different choice and generating invalid data. Without the deleted data flow, there may be a null
value that extension logic is not properly dealing with.
As was suggested, the best thing to do may be to restore from backup and get the system back to a known state.
If you have development skills and if you have the source code to your custom rules extensions, it is fairly easy to debug and single step through the code. This of course must be done with extreme caution if you are in a production environment. You will
also need familiarity with how the FIM Synchronization engine works. Documentation is here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms698774

How to save tdm file from GPI extension DLL

Hi,
Is there any way to save data channels to tdm file format from GPI extension dll.
I've tried lDataSave function, but I get DAT file format.
I've also tried using Diadem.TOCommand interface, It'works with CmdExecuteASync method, but not with CmdExecuteSync (I've thought using a new thread with CmdExecuteASync, but what about synchronization ?).
As I need to run a process like, do something, save tdm file, then do another thing, I'm a little lost.
Thanks for any suggestion.
JMA.

Hello!
First: I have no solution!
Second: Some remarks to using a OLE interface to DIAdem in GPI.
My experience is that there are only few situations and circumstances where it might be the only way to solve a problem. There are some critical things to know. If you create a ToCommand interface it isn't guaranteed that you get an interface to the proccess you are running in. In normal cases it will be but you can't be sure! CmdExecuteSync doesn't work because usually your command is initiated out of a script. While running a script DIAdem will not execute another command.
The problem with CmdExecuteASync is that the command will be put onto the DIAdem command stack. It will be executed after the script is finished. You can not be sure that the channel data is the same as it was at the time you called CmdExecuteASync. Multiple Calls to CmdExecuteASync will be executed after another.
Sorry that I do not have a solution but perhaps I can avoid some frustrating DIAdem-OLE-Test-Sessions.
Matthias
Matthias Alleweldt
Project Engineer / Projektingenieur
Twigeater?

[SOLVED] Gnome Shell Extensions won't install from website

When I go to https://extensions.gnome.org/ from either Chromium or Firefox, extensions fail to install. If I click the toggle to turn a new extension "ON", nothing happens. Reloading the site switches it back to "OFF".
I was able to install gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayer-git from the AUR. (Which also pulls in gnome-shell-extension-common-git.) It works fine. The problem is that most of the extensions on the AUR appear to be outdated and the users directed to the official site.
This is a relatively new install of Arch and extensions have never worked. Maybe there's a package I'm missing? Or is there a way to get any debugging output? I'm not sure where to look.
Last edited by ioos (2013-02-27 23:50:32)

I found the following from AskUbuntu (not my own words, pasted from the source:
I'll take a wild stab in the dark: If you're using Chrome/Chromium, navigate to about:plugins and make sure "Gnome Shell Integration" is enabled. Then navigate back to extensions.gnome.org and when the ribbon appears at the top make sure you "Always Allow for this Site"
On Firefox you'll have to do something similar if you've turned extensions off. Browse to about:plugins and make sure libgnome-shell-browser-plugin.so is present / enabled. If it's not, upgrade Gnome Shell, or find it on your filesystem and link to it from to ~/.mozilla/plugins (you shouldn't have to do this though).
Source

Missing Rules extension dll

Recently ran into an issue where an MA is failing with the the following error: stopped-extension-dll-file-not-found
The event logs show its looking for an extension dll that IS in the directory: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Forefront Identity Manager\2010\Synchronization Service\Extensions\
Even though the dll is located within this directory, it does not show up when trying to select a dll via the MA properties.
any thoughts?
Opper....

Framework version should have nothing to do with this. FIM Sync supports even 4.5 if installed on the box.
Could it be an extension DLL instead that is missing?
Regards, Soren Granfeldt
blog is at http://blog.goverco.com | facebook https://www.facebook.com/TheIdentityManagementExplorer | twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/MrGranfeldt

Extensibility.dll issue

Dear all,
we upgraded our crm from 4.0 to 7.0. We went for the GWI using the GWI-Addin. This requires a dynamic library called extensibility.dll
As we have a standrard WinXP, Office 2003 and .Net FW 2.0 installed, this dll is not available.
did anyone face the same issue?
Thanks and regards,
Jodi

Hi
The extensibility dll is prerequisite for Client GWI.
Why extensibility is not a part of package for client GWI is because it is not redistributable dll from microsoft, however end user can download it from micrsoft site.
Easiest way to get extensibiliyt dll is to implemnet miscrosoft note KB908002 . (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/KB908002)
Best Regards
Ashish Rawat

MFC Extension DLL or MFC DLL with "Automation"

I've been planning a project for quite some time now that uses MFC code and is heavily object oriented. A couple MFC applications run on top of the dll formed platform and draw on various functional objects stored in a DLL. For the time being, I've been
struggling to get them to link together, so I was wondering what kind of DLL I should use.
Both Extension DLL's and the feature automation have their merits. But when the Extension DLL is selected, the Automation option is greyed out. What exactly is the difference and which one would be better to use.
Until such a time I attempt to port the project over to another platform, I don't intend to use non-MFC software run on top of these libraries so non-MFC shouldn't be an issue.

If you want to build automation components, you'll want to use a regular DLL.
The following help topics might help clarify:
Extension DLLs
Using Database, OLE, and Socket Extension DLL's in Regular DLLs
Think of it this way. An extension DLL extends MFC, so can only be utilized by an MFC based application.But a COM DLL is a stand alone component, that can be utilized by non-MFC applications, which by definition precludes them from being extension
DLL's.
Sincerely,
Ed Dore

New GNOME Shell Extensions That Provide A GNOME2-Like User Experience

Ron Yorston has created some pretty cool GNOME Shell extensions that "provide a user experience more akin to that of GNOME 2". Using these extensions you can move the clock next to your username, get an old-style menu, disable dynamic workspaces and place the favourites on the top panel.
you can get more info here:
at webupd8.org and on his homepage
I also made a package: gnome-shell-frippery
here's a screenshot:

I download gnote extension from this page: http://www.fpmurphy.com/gnome-shell-extensions/
I edit extension.js from ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/[email protected] to have more tray icons on status bar and not only gnote (which I am not using). So I added Pidgin and Skype to the file. But with Pidgin there is problem, it has icon very top and I would like to have it in center like icon Skype...anyone know how to do this?

Requesting 64-bit Shell Extension DLL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for