Reroute Traffic Destined for Outside IP Address

Please don’t laugh, but we have a legitimate need to have a Sling Box installed at our main location to enable our corporate PR/Marketing person at another office to be able to watch Live Television (News). For those familiar with a product called Sling Box, this is what they are made for.
Current configuration:
-Sling box installed at Waukesha
-Connected to LAN with an IP on our 32 vlan of 10.128.32.77 (DHCP reservation) -> in sling box terminology this is the “home IP"
-Configured ASA Firewall to NAT sling box to external IP of ##.###.###.216 -> in sling box terminology this is the “away IP"
-Accessing the sling box externally works perfectly
-Accessing the sling box internally on a computer in the same subnet works perfectly
-Accessing the sling box internally on a computer on any other vlan/subnet fails
Specific to the last point, there is some magic that apparently happens as I did a packet capture last night while at our remote office. There is a payload that comes from the sling box data center that tells the playback software which IP to use (home IP vs away IP) and the Wire Shark inspection literally shows the ##.###.###.216 address. For reasons beyond my understanding, but I remember from deplying the ASA and VPNs there is no way for traffic to leave our firewall (normal traffic is NAT’d to ##.###.###.210) and have it successfully re-enter the same outside interface to then come right back in on ##.###.###.216
I spoke with Sling Box support and there is absolutely no way to override or specify an IP address within the playback software to expressly connect to the home IP vs the outside IP.
All of that said, I am wondering how best to:
Intercept traffic destined for ##.###.###.216 and redirect it to the internal IP address of sling box of 10.128.32.77. Easy to do on Cisco routers or best to do on windows with a static route? I am lost and know there is likely a simple static route command or firewall configuration that will make this happen.

If your route point is a router or L3 switch then you could configure a route-map with an ACL that is used to change the next hop ip for the servers in the DC to the DRC. This will be a lot of manual configuration and testing but it maybe a viable solution.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Similar Messages

Redirect traffic destined for an IP on Server 1 to go to Server 2 at DR Site?

DNS is what I'm using for most of my subnets. The problem is that I have a handful of subnets that have devices that are under the control of an outside agency. Those devices access a server in my DC by pointing to the IP Address.
If I performed a failover test to Server 2 at a DR Site, how can I redirect traffic from those subnets to Server 2 if they are still pointing at the IP on Server 1? In the DC, a 6509 sits between Server 1 and the subnets in question. To get to Server 2 at the DR site, I have an FWSM in the DC and an ASA5585 at the DR site.

If your route point is a router or L3 switch then you could configure a route-map with an ACL that is used to change the next hop ip for the servers in the DC to the DRC. This will be a lot of manual configuration and testing but it maybe a viable solution.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

RV016 Router Allow All Traffic For Outside IP

Hi,
I need to configure the firewall to allow all traffice for an IP address of a sever. What steps in the router do i need to configure this? This is a cloud based voip server and we have IP phones and we need to add an IP address of the phone server to allow all traffic for that IP.
thanks.

Hi Jonathan,
I have a similar problem with VOIP traffic being dropped by my new RV016 v3 router.
I have created one Firewall Rule, to allow ALL traffic from the external VOIP PBX provider (single IP) to connect to the internal VOIP phones, which have assigned addresses in a small IP Address range (eg. 10.1.2.50 - 10.1.2.59)
The Aastra VOIP phones continually loose their registration wtih the cloud-based PBX. If you make an outgoing call, it will work, but the PBX will lose connection with the phone, 3 or 4 minutes after you hang up, and will mark it as offline. Incoming calls made within the 3 or 4 minutes will get through, but after that they go right to voicemail on the PBX system.
We used to have an RV016 v2 router and VOIP traffic worked OK, with a similar Firewall Rule. We replaced the v2 router because its CPU crashed.
I tested the VOIP traffic with a WRT160 router with minimal Firewall Rules, and it works OK, as long as SIP-ALG is turned Off. We want to use the RV016 because it provides a larger number of ports for our LAN.
Any suggestions ?
Kirk

ASA 5505 - L2TP over IPsec - Remote Address shows outside interface address

Using an ASA 5505 for firewall and VPN. We've enabled L2TP over IPsec to allow Windows clients to connect without third party software.
The devices complete the connection and authenticate fine, but then are unable to hit any internal resources. Split tunneling seems to be working, as they can still hit outside resources. Packet tracer shows tcp flowing freely between VPN clients (192.168.102.0/24) and internal resources (192.168.100.0/24). Even the NAT translation looks good in packet tracer.
I pulled up the session details for one of the VPN clients in the ASDM and under the IPsecOverNatT details, it is showing the VPN client's remote address correctly, but displays the local address as the address assigned to the outside interface (which the client is using to connect.) This seems to be the problem, as viewing detailed connection logs shows the internal resources trying to send packets back to the outside interface rather than the VPN client's assigned internal addresses. Details:
Crypto map tag: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP, seq num: 65535, local addr: [OUTSIDE INTERFACE ADDRESS]
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): ([OUTSIDE INTERFACE ADDRESS]/255.255.255.255/17/1701)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): ([VPN CLIENT ADDRESS]/255.255.255.255/17/0)
current_peer: [VPN CLIENT ADDRESS], username: vpnuser
dynamic allocated peer ip: 192.168.102.1 [This is what I think it should be showing for local ident]
dynamic allocated peer ip(ipv6): 0.0.0.0
#pkts encaps: 16, #pkts encrypt: 16, #pkts digest: 16
#pkts decaps: 18, #pkts decrypt: 18, #pkts verify: 18
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 16, #pkts comp failed: 0, #pkts decomp failed: 0
#post-frag successes: 0, #post-frag failures: 0, #fragments created: 0
#PMTUs sent: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, #decapsulated frgs needing reassembly: 0
#TFC rcvd: 0, #TFC sent: 0
#Valid ICMP Errors rcvd: 0, #Invalid ICMP Errors rcvd: 0
#pkts no sa (send): 0, #pkts invalid sa (rcv): 0
#pkts encaps failed (send): 0, #pkts decaps failed (rcv): 0
#pkts invalid prot (rcv): 0, #pkts verify failed: 0
#pkts invalid identity (rcv): 0, #pkts invalid len (rcv): 0
#pkts invalid pad (rcv): 0,
#pkts invalid ip version (rcv): 0,
#pkts replay rollover (send): 0, #pkts replay rollover (rcv): 0
#pkts replay failed (rcv): 0
#pkts min mtu frag failed (send): 0, #pkts bad frag offset (rcv): 0
#pkts internal err (send): 0, #pkts internal err (rcv): 0
local crypto endpt.: [OUTSIDE INTERFACE ADDRESS]/4500, remote crypto endpt.: [VPN CLIENT ADDRESS]/8248
path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 82(52), media mtu 1500
PMTU time remaining (sec): 0, DF policy: copy-df
ICMP error validation: disabled, TFC packets: disabled
current outbound spi: 05BFAE20
current inbound spi : CF85B895
inbound esp sas:
spi: 0xCF85B895 (3481647253)
transform: esp-aes esp-sha-hmac no compression
in use settings ={RA, Transport, NAT-T-Encaps, IKEv1, }
slot: 0, conn_id: 77824, crypto-map: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (4373998/3591)
IV size: 16 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Anti replay bitmap:
0x00000000 0x000FFFFD
outbound esp sas:
spi: 0x05BFAE20 (96448032)
transform: esp-aes esp-sha-hmac no compression
in use settings ={RA, Transport, NAT-T-Encaps, IKEv1, }
slot: 0, conn_id: 77824, crypto-map: SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (4373999/3591)
IV size: 16 bytes
replay detection support: Y
Anti replay bitmap:
0x00000000 0x00000001
Any ideas? The remote clients connect but when internal resources try to send traffic to the VPN clients, the packets are directed to the outside interface address instead of the local address assigned to the VPN client.

I have what I believe to be a similar issue. Site to site vpn is working well. That is site b can ping and send traffic to site A but Site A can not. Site B is a 3rd party vpn router. Site A is a Cisco 5505.
It appears that when the crypto map inserts the route into the routing table it shows the route via the outside IP of the outside interface and not the IP of Site B. in the crypto map I can see the proper ip address for the peer. I can't figure out why when it inserts the route that it uses the wrong ip address

Reroute Traffic

Let's consider 2 organizations - Fabrikam and Contoso. Each has its own Lync Servers 2013 deployment. Lync Federation is set up between the 2 organizations as to allow communication to happen. Fabrikam is purchased by Contoso. An email integration is also
performed, and due to a hard requirement each Fabrikam user now has 2 mailboxes - one with @fabrikam.com and another with @contoso.com, in order to allow users to be able to select the From field in Outlook (this behavior is not possible with one mailbox with
multiple aliases). Email forwarding is configured as to have just one of the mailboxes receive all the traffic. However this presents a problem for the migrated users: mails addressed to @fabrikam.com will allow recipients to use the contextual Lync menus
and directly Lync IM/call the respective contact, however those mails addressed to @contoso.com won't have this. An example: Ted is a Fabrikam employee; following the email integration he now has [email protected] and [email protected] His Lync account has [email protected]
as SIP address. Hence trying to use the Lync integration from within Outlook will fail for those emails addressed to [email protected], simply because this SIP address doesn't exist in the Contoso Lync deployment.
Is there a way to somehow reroute all Lync traffic addressed to [email protected] to [email protected] ? Ideally a behavior similar to the
targetAddress attribute, that's being used in Exchange.

Hi,
Base on my understanding, it is possible to achive with the method you provided above.
Here is a similar case for you:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/f8630c35-c717-486b-b877-32d1beea8c46/lync-online-meeting-schedule?forum=lyncconferencing
However, it is better to add a sip domain in Lync Server (Contoso) and migrate users to it as Saleesh said above.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Trunk port as a destination for SPAN session

Can we make a trunk port as a destination for SPAN session? If yes, how

Of course you can. It will be configured the same as an access port:
monitor session 1 destination int g0/24
However be aware of the following:
Destination Port
Each local SPAN session destination session must have a destination port (also called a monitoring port) that receives a copy of traffic from the source port.
The destination port has these characteristics:
•It must reside on the same switch as the source port (for a local SPAN session).
•It can be any Ethernet physical port.
•It cannot be a source port or a reflector port.
•It cannot be an EtherChannel group or a VLAN.
•It can be a physical port that is assigned to an EtherChannel group, even if the EtherChannel group has been specified as a SPAN source. The port is removed from the group while it is configured as a SPAN destination port.
•The port does not transmit any traffic except that required for the SPAN session.
•If ingress traffic forwarding is enabled for a network security device, the destination port forwards traffic at Layer 2.
•It does not participate in spanning tree while the SPAN session is active.
•When it is a destination port, it does not participate in any of the Layer 2 protocols (STP, VTP, CDP, DTP, PagP, or LACP).
•No address learning occurs on the destination port.
•A destination port receives copies of sent and received traffic for all monitored source ports. If a destination port is oversubscribed, it could become congested. This could affect traffic forwarding on one or more of the source ports.

Port forwarding for the Web server for outside Internet (not working , help!!!!!!)

Hello
I am trying to learn something new here. We have web server inside our organization its IP address is 172.16.0.35. We want outside Internet users to access web server, How is it possible? Please have a look at the running configuration. Web server is working inside the organization but not at outside. Our Static Public IP is 197.255.232.15 it is assigned to Inetrface Gigabit ATM0.1 and ISP default GW is 197.255.232.1. Let me know whats next? How do I make web server inside the organization available for outside Internet users. Thank you.
Building configuration.
Current configuration : 1983 bytes
! Last configuration change at 17:57:15 UTC Sat Jan 24 2015
version 15.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router_test
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 10
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.16.0.34
ip dhcp pool test
network 172.16.0.32 255.255.255.224
dns-server 197.255.224.18 197.255.224.66
default-router 172.16.0.34
lease 9
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
license udi pid CISCO887VA-K9 sn FGL1818236L
controller VDSL 0
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
shutdown
interface ATM0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no atm ilmi-keepalive
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
description ATM Routed Bridge Encapsulation (RBE) Internet
ip address 197.255.232.15 255.255.248.0
ip access-group netin in
ip access-group netout out
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
atm route-bridged ip
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
pvc 0/35
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ip inarp
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
no ip address
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface Vlan1
description Lan
ip address 172.16.0.34 255.255.255.224
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1454
interface Dialer1
no ip address
ip default-gateway 197.255.232.1
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list natlist interface ATM0.1 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.35 443 197.255.232.15 443 extendable
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ATM0.1 197.255.232.1
ip access-list extended natlist
permit ip 172.16.0.32 0.0.0.31 any
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login
transport input all
end
http://pastie.org/9858814

Hi Karsten Iwen
I deleted ( ip access-group netin in and ip access-group netout out) but it still does not work
my config :
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2267 bytes
! Last configuration change at 15:43:06 UTC Wed Jan 28 2015
version 15.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
memory-size iomem 10
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.16.0.34
ip dhcp pool my
network 172.16.0.32 255.255.255.224
dns-server 197.255.224.18 197.255.224.66
default-router 172.16.0.34
lease 9
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
license udi pid CISCO887VA-K9 sn FGL1818236L
controller VDSL 0
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
shutdown
interface ATM0
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no atm ilmi-keepalive
interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
description ATM Routed Bridge Encapsulation (RBE) Internet
ip address 197.255.232.15 255.255.248.0
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip nat outside
no ip virtual-reassembly in
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 0/35
encapsulation aal5snap
no protocol ip inarp
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
no ip address
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface Vlan1
description
ip address 172.16.0.34 255.255.255.224
ip nat inside
no ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1414
interface Dialer1
no ip address
ip default-gateway 197.255.232.1
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list natlist interface ATM0.1 overload
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.16.0.35 443 197.255.232.15 443 extendable
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ATM0.1 197.255.232.1
ip access-list extended natlist
permit ip 172.16.0.32 0.0.0.31 any
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
end
Router#sh ip nat translations
Pro Inside global Inside local Outside local Outside global
tcp 197.255.232.15:5183 172.16.0.33:5183 212.95.74.5:80 212.95.74.5:80
tcp 197.255.232.15:5196 172.16.0.33:5196 212.95.74.5:80 212.95.74.5:80
tcp 197.255.232.15:5602 172.16.0.33:5602 174.129.246.27:80 174.129.246.27:80
tcp 197.255.232.15:5785 172.16.0.33:5785 31.13.93.3:443 31.13.93.3:443
tcp 197.255.232.15:443 172.16.0.35:443 --- ---

How can i split Client Network traffic and My exchange traffic with two differnet ip address?

Hello Everyone
sorry for my bad English and also my bad explaine
here is my network looks like
all the client on one subnet and network is 192.168.0.0
i have Dsl router that connect to Tmg server
i have Tmg with two NIC
1-192.168.0.4
2- 2 Public Ip address
i want to do this
i want to split user's traffic and my exchange traffic
i mean i want to route user's traffic with one public ip addresss
and my exchange server's traffic with another public address
but when i add additional ip address at Tmg or create new NIC card
all of my traffic route with one public ip Address what should i do?

Hi Uhan,
You need to use ENAT fuction on TMG to achive this
On the External NIC assing the Second IP as Additionl IP address (VIP)
Create a network Rule to NAT traffice From Exchange server IP address to the required Public IP which you need the E NAT.
Ensure you are creating rule only from Exchange server IP and not all INternal.
Look at the below Doc you step by step config
http://www.isaserver.org/articles-tutorials/configuration-general/Configuring-One-to-One-NAT-TMG-2010.html

ASA single outside IP address to an inbound NAT pool that round robins request to 2 web servers

How do I create a single outside IP address 1.2.3.4 to an inbound NAT pool that round robins request to 2 web servers?
I have 2 web server 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2. They have the exact same content.
I think I start with defining the pool as an object group which contains 2 server 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2
object-group network appservers
network-object host 10.0.0.1
network-object host 10.0.0.2
What to do next?
object-group network appservers
nat (inside,outside) static 1.2.3.4
gives me an error.

No, unfortunately you can't configure round robin static inbound NAT for 2 internal web servers.

Campaigns - Hard bounces for valid email addresses

I am getting hard bounces with 'Bad Mailbox Destination Address' for valid email addresses that everybody internally and externally can email without problem.
Doesn't instill me with much faith for sending out 10,000 emails next week!

If you can email that address manually from a regular email address and it goes through fine then it's likely you might be getting blocked by spam filters although usually that would be indicated in your bounce message.
Is your site fully hosted on BC (ie - with BC's nameservers) or is your domain hosted via an A record to point to BC? If you are being blocked by spam filters then you are likely using the A record because fully hosted sites on BC have the SPF records in place.
If you are using an A record to point to BC's servers for your domain and manage your DNS records somwehere then you need to add a TXT record with the SPF data. Goto your domain registrar and manage your DNS entries. You'll want to add a TXT record with the following info:
Record name: @
Record type: TXT
Record value: v=spf1 mx include:worldsecuresystems.com ~all
Record TTL: 86400
You can only have one SPF record on your domain so if you already have a TXT record with SPF data in it for other email services your domain uses (like gmail) you just need to update your TXT SPF record and add "include:worldsecuresystems.com" after the first "include" statement in the TXT record the TXT value would look like:
"v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:worldsecuresystems.com ~all"
If your problem is that your emails are blocked by spam filters that should fix it but I'm pretty sure 'Bad Mailbox Destination Address' usually indicates a non-existent or malformatted username in your email address (ie - the part before the "@"). I would also double check your subscribers list and make sure there are no spaces or any other invalid character in the email addresses for the customers that are getting bounced back.
Here's more information about your specific error from http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232118(v=exchg.80).aspx which has to do with MS Exchange server specifically but still provides a good explanation:
5.1.1
Bad destination mailbox address
This failure may be caused by the following conditions:
The recipient e-mail address was entered incorrectly by the sender.
No recipient exists in the destination e-mail system.
The recipient mailbox has been moved and the Microsoft Office Outlook recipient cache on the sender's computer has not updated.
An invalid legacy domain name (DN) exists for the recipient mailbox Active Directory.
This error typically occurs when the sender of the message incorrectly enters the e-mail address of the recipient. The sender should check the recipient's e-mail address and send again. This error can also occur if the recipient e-mail address was correct in the past but has changed or has been removed from the destination e-mail system.
If the sender of the message is in the same Exchange organization as the recipient, and the recipient mailbox still exists, determine whether the recipient mailbox has been relocated to a new e-mail server. If this is the case, Outlook may not have updated the recipient cache correctly. Instruct the sender to remove the recipient address from sender's Outlook recipient cache and then create a new message. Resending the original message will result in the same failure.
Other issues may cause this error, such as an invalid legacy distinguished name (DN) in Active Directory. Examine and correct the legacy DN of the recipient's mailbox. Then instruct the sender to remove the recipient address from sender's Outlook recipient cache and then create a new message. Resending the original message will result in the same failure.

Question about NAT Inside Source, Inside Destination, and Outside Source

I read the Cisco command references about "ip nat inside source", "inside destination", and "outside source", but couldn't have a clear understanding of how to associate the commands with "ip nat inside" and ip nat outside" configured for interfaces.
Does "ip nat inside source ..." translation only happen on the interface configured as "ip nat inside"?
Since NAT is a bidirectional action, what's the difference between "ip nat inside cource ..." and "ip nat inside destination ..."?
I've never used "ip nat outside source ...". In what cases would it be needed?
On an interface where there are NAT translation and also other actions such as policy map or IP Sec crypto map, would NAT happen before or after other actions?
Thanks for help with any questions.
Gary

Hi Gary,
The following documents may help you to understand some of the terminology:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094831.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094837.shtml
Also, the following document has a clear explanation of the order of operations when using NAT:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Paresh

Gethostbyaddr failing for private IP addresses

We are having problems with reverse DNS resolution for our private IP addresses. We first noticed this when our syslog-ng was not displaying name in the log entries, but rather IP addresses.
Nslookup and dig reversed resolved the addresses fine, so we don�t think the issue is in DNS.
We further narrowed down the source of the problem when we wrote a small C program that called gethostbyaddr for the private address. This program also failed to reverse resolve the addresses.
We decided to snoop the traffic to our DNS server. What we saw was that no packets were being sent. In other words our Solaris server didn�t even try to query DNS for the reverse resolution.
Is there a flag or setting somewhere in Solaris that we can adjust to have reverse resolution for private IP addresses sent to our DNS servers?
Thanks�
Mike

Make sure the addresses aren't already present in /etc/hosts or /etc/inet/ipnodes. Otherwise it probably won't attempt to use DNS.
Darren

Did you know GamingAhead Launches the Ultimate Online Gaming Destination For All Ages.

Did you know GamingAhead Launches the Ultimate Online Gaming Destination For All Ages.
Gaming Ahead presents a video review of Prototype which is an action packed bizarrely made sandbox game. Avik Sogoyan and Michael Fam go through the games features and give their thoughts on the title. Be sure to check it out on GamingAhead.com where you will also find a full written review of the game. Prototype is not Infamous!

Did you know GamingAhead Launches the Ultimate Online Gaming Destination For All Ages.
Gaming Ahead presents a video review of Prototype which is an action packed bizarrely made sandbox game. Avik Sogoyan and Michael Fam go through the games features and give their thoughts on the title. Be sure to check it out on GamingAhead.com where you will also find a full written review of the game. Prototype is not Infamous!

How to create a RFC destination for extracting data to HANA

Hello All,
Could someone help me in providing a document or note on how to create a RFC destination for extracting data from SAP data source to HANA using SAP LT replication server ?
I am able to create a data base connection while transforming data from non SAP data source,but wasnt able to transform data which is from SAP abap tables .

Hi Venkatesh,
In SM59 t.code we create RFC destinations.
Go thru the video link for creating RFC destinations step by step
How to setup a trusted RFC connection between SAP systems: a step-by-step guide - YouTube

When i want to create a face time it tells me to vertify my email address. When i go to do this i have to type in my apple ID and password on the Apple website, however when ever i do this i get a message saying Invalid account for this Email Address..

when i want to create a face time it tells me to vertify my email address. When i go to do this i have to type in my apple ID and password on the Apple website, however when ever i do this i get a message saying Invalid account for this Email Address..

Same problem here. Whats the deal?! Apple??

Reroute Traffic Destined for Outside IP Address

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for