Rescheduling using transaction V_V2

I have created a Stock transport order and now I want to reschedule it using transaction V_V2, but I am facing problem in this.
Can anyone please help me out.
Thanks & Regards,
Nilesh Kumar

Hi
For the versions 4.6c onwards, this function v_v2 is extended for STO's also.
In the intial screen you need to choose the radio button for 'process stock transfer docs' and opt either item level or sch line level.
Choose the requirement of unconfirmed documents. Due to this system gives a list of STO's which are not having committed quantity.
Select simulation and execute.
Now in the subsequent screen, you will see new confirmed quantities for the STO's those listed in the page.
Go back, deselect the 'simulation' and then execute. Due to new confirmed quantities the committed quantity field(s) in the schedule line of your STOs will get updated.
With this you can get multiple schedule lines also.
warm regards
sairam akundi

Similar Messages

How to use transaction FPOP

Hi, All,
I am trying to do delta upload for FI-CA business partner items 0FC_BP_ITEMS. I see there is a documentation say "Before you start the delta extraction, you should update the delta queue for this DataSource in the plugged-in OLTP system using transaction FPOP.". After my initial load, I made a new posting. And then I ran FPOP, and then I run delta update. But I am told "No new data since the last delta update". So seems delta did not get my new posting. Is there anybody can give some advice, or tell me how to use FPOP? I am not sure how to create the Variant in FPOP. Thanks a lot!
Meiying

HI ,
Steps for FPOP
1. Under General Selection tab input Date ID and Identification. - > Combination of this must be Unique.
2.Steps to create Variant - >Under technical settings tab , select tab for variant maintenance -> press F7 to create a new variant -> give a variant name -> Select number of intervals and give number value as 999 and execute.
New Variant is created.
3.Use the new variant, save all settings and "Schedule the program run".
4.Click on refresh to track the status of the program run.
5.Goto RSA7 and check for the Delta Queue - new values will be populated.

Schedule Background job using transaction CATM

Hi all,
Since we cannot schedule a background job using transaction CATM, I have created a program calling the CATM transaction through batch-input.
I have done a recording and entered the coding in a Z-program. For a vendor, I have recorded time in CAT2 for multiple purchase orders.
After entering the vendor number in CATM, all the purchase orders showed up. I have clicked 'select all' and posted.
When I run the program in the background, it posts only for one purchase order.
When I run the program in the foreground, using the Select All-button it only proceeds with the first line in my list of PO's.
How to read the whole stack and post the whole stack of purchase orders?
Please help me out with this.
Thanks
Regards
Srinivasan Desingh
408 368 3837

Hi,
When I run the program in the background, it posts only for one purchase order.
When I run the program in the foreground, using the Select All-button it only proceeds with the first line in my list of PO's.
See..it's a Z-program so Its difficult to answer without checking the program. But I think, you should check your BDC again from Debugging, with the help of your abaper. You will find, why its is processing only one entry.
Regards
Shishir

Why multiple log files are created while using transaction in berkeley db

we are using berkeleydb java edition db base api, we have already read/write CDRFile of 9 lack rows with transaction and
without transaction implementing secondary database concept the issues we are getting are as follows:-
with transaction----------size of database environment 1.63gb which is due to no. of log files created each of 10 mb.
without transaction-------size of database environment 588mb and here only one log file is created which is of 10mb. so we want to know how REASON CONCRETE CONCLUSION ..
how log files are created and what is meant of using transaction and not using transaction in db environment and what are this db files db.001,db.002,_db.003,_db.004,__db.005 and log files like log.0000000001.....plz reply soon

we are using berkeleydb java edition db base api, If you are seeing __db.NNN files in your environment root directory, these are environment's shared region files. And since you see these you are using Berkeley DB Core (with the Java/JNI Base API), not Berkeley DB Java Edition.
with transaction ...
without transaction ...First of all, do you need transactions or not? Review the documentation section called "Why transactions?" in the Berkeley DB Programmer's Reference Guide.
without transaction-------size of database environment 588mb and here only one log file is created which is of 10mb.There should be no logs created when transactions are not used. That single log file has likely remained there from the previous transactional run.
how log files are created and what is meant of using transaction and not using transaction in db environment and what are this db files db.001,db.002,_db.003,_db.004,__db.005 and log files like log.0000000001Have you reviewed the basic documentations references for Berkeley DB Core?
- Berkeley DB Programmer's Reference Guide
in particular sections: The Berkeley DB products, Shared memory regions, Chapter 11. Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store Applications, Chapter 17. The Logging Subsystem.
- Getting Started with Berkeley DB (Java API Guide) and Getting Started with Berkeley DB Transaction Processing (Java API Guide).
If so, you would have had the answers to these questions; the __db.NNN files are the environment shared region files needed by the environment's subsystems (transaction, locking, logging, memory pool buffer, mutexes), and the log.MMMMMMMMMM are the log files needed for recoverability and created when running with transactions.
--Andrei

Error while creating logical file using transaction FILE

Hello there,
I am facing an error while creating Logical File name definition using transaction FILE
This is the input which I'm trying to give
Logical file name: ZTEST
Name : ZTEST
Physical file : ZTEST_1<DATE><TIME>.csv
Data format: ASC
Application area: BW
Logical path:ZTEST_1_DATAOUT
when I tried to save it throws me an error like ASSIGN_SUBSTRING_NOT_ALLOWED
Please help.

Hi,
Please check the OSS Notes :
Note 792061 - SP Case Locator: Dump: ASSIGN to a substring isn't allowed.
SAP Note 1297989 - Short dump ASSIGN_SUBSTRING_NOT_ALLOWED
Hope this solves the problem.
-Vikram

Creation of New T Code Using Transaction Variant

Hi,
I have created a new T code (YMM02) by using transaction variant. The new T code created is copy of MM02.
I have changed the material by using new T code (YMM02) which is created using Transaction variant. Once I complete the Transaction (i.e. have done changes in material master and save) it is going to original T Code (MM02). Requirement is it should be in the same T Code (YMM02), so that I can edit the material again with the new T Code (YMM02)
Regards,
Hari.

Hi Hariprasad,
If restricting certain fields using field selection option is not suitable for you, you can go ahead with the option Screen Variend
Also refer the link
[https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/Transaction%20Variant%20-%20A%20Step%20by%20Step%20Guide%20for%20Creation]

Posting goods receipt using transaction MB1C

Hi
When I posting goods receipt using transaction MB1C , I am getting following error
Account 310000 for Transo/event key BSX is a A control Account.
Please tell me the solution for this error.
kalai.

Dear Suriya,
If your issue is still un-resolved, Just try with:
T. Code: FS00
Key-in your G/L Account - 310000 & Company Code, in respective fields; go to
Tab: Create/bank/interest
Here, you will find a Box: Post automatically only. Enable the box (check-mark the box) for GR/IR clearing account.
Jope, this may help in some ways.
Best Regards,
Amit.
Note: In continuation to others' suggestion, I'll also suggest to consult FI-Personnel, at your end.

REG: Creation of Warehouse product using transaction /SCWM/MAT1

Hi,
My requirement is to create Warehouse Products using Transaction /SCWM/MAT1 , I am using BAPI_PRDSRVAPS_SAVEMULTI2 , but I cound't able to process this because I did find Warehouse number in this BAPI, Am I using correct BAPI, if that is the case let me know the BAPI for warehouse product data,
Thanks
RK

Hi,
There is no specific list, it depends completely on the condition types that have been configured in your system.
The answer you were given was a good one and gave you as much detail as you could expect.
If you are having a particular problem or issue then let us know and we will do all that we can to help.
The easiest way to find out the "list" is to simply click on the "possible entries" tab at the right of the field. !!!!!!!!!!!
Steve B

Using transaction code KEAI for CO-PA to FI validation

I wanted to see if anyone has experience using transaction code KEAI (Analysis of Value Flow FI-COPA). I know there is also transaction code KEAT for SD to CO-PA to FI validation. However for our needs KEAI seems a bit more user friendly. I have not really found any documenation on KEAI online or in SAP help. The program for this transaction code is RKE_RECONCILIATION_FI. Does anyone know the key difference between KEAI and KEAT. Any input you have would be appreciated.

KEAI is analyzes all value flows to CO-PA as against KEAT which deals with Transfer of Billing Documents.
The reconciliation covers all record types - A to I and Z (PA postings only)
You can restrict the report for components like - billing, CO objects, FI Docs
You can see the result by all documents, documents only with delta, documents only with delta to CO-PA
You can display summarized report if required and expand.
The output shows delta in detailed columns like - Account / Source Document / PA Value Field, FI Value, Document Value, PA Relevant Value, CO-PA Value, FI Doc. Delta, PA Doc Delta, Crcy.
The report is collapsible - company code > account > Document > Value Field

Use transacted session in MDB

          Hi,
          If I use transacted session in MDB with container managed transaction, dose the
          weblogic ignore the transacted setting or start in it's own transaction. I looked
          the JMS Tutorial from Sun, the J2EE server just ignore the transacted setting,
          treated it as non-transacted session.
          Thanks


          Thanks, Greg. I created another XAQCF in MQ JMSADMIN, but still did not help. The
          strange part is when this exception happens, in the Event Viewer there is a Message:
          An internal Websphere MQ Error has occurred'. In the Trace Log of MQ, the Major
          Error Code reported is arcE_XAER_PROTO.
          Has anyone encountered this error? The same code works fine when enlist an XAQCF
          defined in Weblogic and PUT into a Weblogic JMS Queue instead within the same
          XA Transaction. I am attaching the stack trace to this message, just in case,
          someone has useful pointers to help me. May be this is MQ Specific though I made
          sure I have the latest FixPack for MQ installed.
          Thanks,
          Sridhar
          "Greg Brail" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >Yeah. This comes up from time to time. MQ is upset because it wants to
          >be
          >enlisted in the JTA transaction, but JTA is not enlisting it because
          >it
          >thinks it's already enlisted. It thinks it's already enlisted because
          >the
          >same MQ connection factory was used for the MDB input queue, even though
          >it's a different JMS connection and session.
          >
          >You can avoid this by creating another "XAQCF" object in the MQ JNDI
          >space
          >and giving it a different name. If you do that -- essentially use different
          >connection factories for the MDB's input and output queues -- then this
          >will
          >work.
          >
          >Also, the transaction enlistement code in 8.1 that supports the
          >"resource-ref" feature avoids this problem.
          >
          > greg
          >
          >"Sridhar Krishnaswamy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >news:[email protected]...
          >>
          >> Hi Greg:
          >> I assume you meant to getXAResource() from an Object of type
          >XAQueueSession. Here
          >> is the code I tried within the onMessage() method of the MDB:
          >>
          >> XAQueueConnectionFactory factory = (XAQueueConnectionFactory)
          >ctx.lookup("XAQCF")
          >> ;
          >> XAConnection connection = factory.createXAQueueConnection() ;
          >>
          >> XAQueueSession mqSession = connection.createXAQueueSession() ;
          >> XAResource mqResource = mqSession.getXAResource() ;
          >> Transaction tran = TxHelper.getTransaction() ;
          >> tran.enlist(mqResource) ;
          >>
          >> //Then I was going to get the QueueSession Object from XAQueueSession,
          >obtain
          >> the Queue
          >> //Object from JNDI, create the Sender
          >> //and call the send. But I commented out these calls. Even then, after
          >the
          >onMessage
          >> Method
          >> // completes, I get the following error:
          >>
          >> javax.transaction.SystemException: start() failed on resource
          >'com.ibm.mq.MQXAResource':
          >> XAER_PROT : Routine was invoked in an improper context
          >> javax.transaction.xa.XAException: XA Operation failed. see errorcode
          >(which I
          >> am assuming is XAER_PROT).
          >>
          >> Any idea, what I am doing wrong?
          >>
          >>
          >>
          >>
          >> "Greg Brail" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> >In 7.0, you can do your MQ "put" inside the same JTA transaction that
          >> >was
          >> >used to receive the message for the MDB, but you have to do the
          >transaction
          >> >enlistment yourself. Basically, you have to use the class
          >> >weblogic.transaction.TxHelper class to get a reference to the current
          >> >transaction, then call "enlistResource" on the transaction using the
          >> >JTA
          >> >"XAResource" that you get from the MQ JMS "Session" object. I'm sure
          >> >we've
          >> >posted the code in this newsgroup before, but I don't know where,
          >so
          >> >it
          >> >would look something like:
          >> >
          >> >// First, get the MQ QueueSession object you're going to use to send
          >> >the
          >> >message
          >> >QueueSession mqSession = mqConnection.createQueueSession(false, 0);
          >> >XAResource mqResource = mqSession.getXAResource();
          >> >weblogic.transaction.Transaction tran =
          >> >weblogic.transaction.TxHelper.getTransaction();
          >> >tran.enlistResource(mqResource);
          >> >// Now send your message
          >> >
          >> >In 8.1, this will still work, but it's not necessary. If you register
          >> >the MQ
          >> >XA connection factory as a "resource-reference" in your EJB deployment
          >> >descriptors and look it up using java:comp/env the way the documentation
          >> >link way below describes, then this transaction enlistment happens
          >> >automatically. This only happens when you use the "resource-reference"
          >> >feature (which means that old code will still work if it does NOT
          >use
          >> >this
          >> >feature), and it's only in 8.1.
          >> >
          >> > greg
          >> >
          >> >"Sridhar Krishnaswamy" <[email protected]> wrote in
          >message
          >> >news:[email protected]...
          >> >>
          >> >> Hi Greg:
          >> >> Is the Statement
          >> >>
          >> >> 'But in this case, you don't get a "non-transactional" session,
          >but
          >> >actually a
          >> >> session that participates in the current JTA transaction for the
          >thread
          >> >where
          >> >> your EJB is running'
          >> >>
          >> >> also true in the case of an MDB running in Weblogic 7.0 (Container
          >> >Managed
          >> >Transactions)
          >> >> driven by an XAQCF and a Foreign JMS Provider such as MQSeries?
          >In
          >> >other
          >> >words,
          >> >> if I want the MDB to PUT the Message into an MQSeries Queue, can
          >the
          >> >PUT
          >> >be invoked
          >> >> under the Context of the Same XA Transaction? My understanding is
          >that
          >> >WebLogic
          >> >> 7.0 doesn't support send
          >> >> messages out of an MDB within the same XA transaction if the MDB
          >is
          >> >> XA-driven by a foreign JMS provider. Please let me know if this
          >is
          >> >false.
          >> >If true,
          >> >> does Weblogic 8.1 also have this restriction?
          >> >>
          >> >> Thanks,
          >> >> Sridhar Krishnaswamy.
          >> >>
          >> >> "Greg Brail" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >> >> >What do you mean by "use transacted session in MDB?" Are you creating
          >> >> >a new
          >> >> >session inside your MDB, or do you mean something else?
          >> >> >
          >> >> >The only Sun thing I can think of is in code that looks like this:
          >> >> >
          >> >> >InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
          >> >> >QueueConnectionFactory qcf = ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jms/QCF");
          >> >> >Queue queue = ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jms/Queue");
          >> >> >QueueConnection connection = qcf.createQueueConnection();
          >> >> >// Create "transacted" session:
          >> >> >QueueSession session = connection.createQueueSession(true, 0);
          >> >> >QueueSender sender = session.createQueueSender(queue);
          >> >> >TextMessage message = session.createTextMessage("Hello, world");
          >> >> >sender.send(message);
          >> >> >connection.close();
          >> >> >
          >> >> >If you do this, and exactly this, inside an EJB, including the
          >use
          >> >of
          >> >> >"java:comp/env/jms", in WebLogic Server 8.1, then we do indeed
          >ignore
          >> >> >the
          >> >> >"transacted" flag when you create the session, just like Sun says
          >> >we
          >> >> >should
          >> >> >in the EJB and J2EE specs. But in this case, you don't get a
          >> >> >"non-transactional" session, but actually a session that participates
          >> >> >in the
          >> >> >current JTA transaction for the thread where your EJB is running.
          >> >> >
          >> >> >The idea is that if you are working inside an EJB, you don't use
          >> >transacted
          >> >> >sessions -- you use the transaction control given to you by the
          >EJB
          >> >> >container, including the UserTransaction interface and/or the various
          >> >> >container-managed transaction flags, rather than the JMS "transacted
          >> >> >session".
          >> >> >
          >> >> >You can find more information here:
          >> >> >
          >> >> >http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/j2ee_components.html
          >> >> >
          >> >> > greg
          >> >> >
          >> >> >"Jen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >> >> >news:[email protected]...
          >> >> >>
          >> >> >> Hi,
          >> >> >>
          >> >> >> If I use transacted session in MDB with container managed
          >transaction,
          >> >> >dose the
          >> >> >> weblogic ignore the transacted setting or start in it's own
          >> >transaction.
          >> >> >I
          >> >> >looked
          >> >> >> the JMS Tutorial from Sun, the J2EE server just ignore the
          >transacted
          >> >> >setting,
          >> >> >> treated it as non-transacted session.
          >> >> >> Thanks
          >> >> >
          >> >> >
          >> >>
          >> >
          >> >
          >>
          >
          >
          [eRRORS.txt]

Taking snapshot of oracle tables to sql server using transactional replication is taking a long time

Hi All,
I am trying to replicate around 200 oracle tables onto sql server using transaction replication and it taking a long time i.e the initial snapshot is taking more than 24 hrs and it still going on.
Is there any way to replicate those these tables faster?
Kindly help me out..
Thanks

Hi,
According to the description, I know the replication is working fine. But it is very slow.
1. Check the CPU usage on Oracle publisher and SQL Server. This issue may due to slow client processing (Oracle performance) or Network performance issues.
2. Based on SQL Server 2008 Books Online ‘Performance Tuning for Oracle Publishers’ (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms151179(SQL.100).aspx). You can enable the transaction
job set and follow the instructions based on
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms147884(v=sql.100).aspx.
2. You can enable replication agent logging to check the replication behavior. You may follow these steps to collect them:
To enable Distribution Agent verbose logging. Please follow these steps:
a. Open SQL Server Agent on the distribution server.
b. Under Jobs folder, find out the Distribution Agent.
c. Right click the job and choose Properties.
d. Select Steps tap, it should be like this:
e. Click Run agent and click Edit button, add following scripts by the end of scripts in the command box:
-Output C:\Temp\OUTPUTFILE.txt -Outputverboselevel 2
f. Exit the dialogs
For more information about the steps, please refer to:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312292
Hope the information helps.
Tracy Cai
TechNet Community Support

Using transaction launcher to connect CRM 7.0 to a CRM 6.0 system

Hello Experts,
We are considering integrating two IC Web client applications one on CRM 6.0 and the other on CRM 7.0 as transition step before the two systems are fully integrated.
We would like to create a transaction launcher transaction in CRM 7.0 that takes the user to Interaction History bsp page in CRM 6.0. Is there a simple way to do this using transaction launcher?
Best Regards,
Tom Halloran

Hi,
You can use the transaction launcher and the transaction launcher profile, which is part of the IC WebClient profile, to start SAP GUI for HTML transactions via the Internet Transaction Server (ITS) from both Enterprise R/3, SAP CRM transactions from SAP CRM. Starting from CRM 4.0 Add-on, you can use transaction launcher to launch URL and front-office based transactions also.
Agents have access to launch transactions from the IC WebClient navigation bar.
In your case you can include the link for you CRM 6.0 from CRM 7.0 can be grouped under workcenter link group or direct link group of a navbarprofile.
regards,
Muralidhar Prasad.C

How to use transaction in jsp in CQ5.5

Hello,
i'm playing around with transactions Jackrabbit should be capable of
I didn't find any resource to that specific topic.
Here's my code so far, but it isn't working properly...
final SlingRepository repository = sling.getService(SlingRepository.class);
Session session = repository.loginAdministrative(null);
UserTransaction utx = sling.getService(UserTransaction.class);
utx.begin();
out.println(utx.getStatus());
Node node = session.getNode("/path/to/a/content");
node.setProperty("a","property");
session.save();
out.println(utx.getStatus());
utx.rollback();
session.logout();
Expected result: The Property "a" is not appended to the node because Transaction was rolled back
Achieved result so far: The property is saved to the node.
What am i doing wrong?
What is the preferred way to use transaction?
Background: we are doing some asset operations in user profile node that take some time. It seems that the reverse replication launcher starts in between the process and breaks the replication process every now and then
Thanks for advice
Marc

I'm not very familiar with ODP .NET so I'm not sure what OracleTransactions is or what it actually does. TTClasses implements the normal TimesTen (ANSI) transaction model:
1. Transactions are specific to a database connection
2. You are always in a transaction except (a) immediately after you have connected and (b) immediately after a commit or rollback
3. The first database operation (including SELECT) executed after (a) or (b) above starts a transaction (there is no explicit 'begin work' operation)
4. A transaction is completed by either committing (call the TTConnection.commit() method or execute the COMMIT [WORK] SQL statement) or by rolling bacl (call the TTConnection.rollback() method or execute the ROLLBACK [WORK] SQL statement).
Does this answer the question? If not, please provide more details on what information you are seeking.
Thanks,
Chris

Problem with posting using transaction FB01.

Hi ,
Does anybody have an idea how to get the screen no. 302
using transaction FB01?
Deatils are :-
SAP Transaction:     FB01
SAP Program Name:     SAPMF05A
SAP Screen Number:     302
anticipating a quisk answer,
vipul

On the first screen enter a posting key of 31 and a vendor account number.
rob

Using Transactions

Hi All,
I want to implement Transaction in my session bean.
My session bean function :
insert(a, b, c){
ut = sessionctx.getUserTransaction();
ut.begin();
try{
obj1.insert(a);
throw CustomException(" Custom exception");
obj1.insert(b);
obj1.insert(c);
}catch(Exception e){
ut.rollback();
ut.commit();
where obj1 - uses connection pool for making any kind of database
operations.
I have mentioned Bean Managed transactions in my ejb-jar.xml
I am not using entity beans.
From the above test it is expected that the first insert(a) should get
rollback.
but it is not so happening with my case.
Am I wrong somewhere in Using Transaction Concept ?
Is there anyplace where i have missed some configuration setting ? somewhere
in my connection pool ?
in ejb-jar.xml ? in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml ?
Any one can help me with this problem ? Any examples ? any links ?
I am using weblogic 5.1 service pack 10 on windows 2000 machine. Is
transaction supported with that ?
Can anyone help me in these regard ?
Thanks in advance.
Bhavin Raichura

Hi.
Please try posting this question in weblogic.developer.interest.transaction or
weblogic.developer.interest.ejb.
Thanks,
Michael
Bhavin Raichura wrote:
Hi All,
I want to implement Transaction in my session bean.
My session bean function :
insert(a, b, c){
ut = sessionctx.getUserTransaction();
ut.begin();
try{
obj1.insert(a);
throw CustomException(" Custom exception");
obj1.insert(b);
obj1.insert(c);
}catch(Exception e){
ut.rollback();
ut.commit();
where obj1 - uses connection pool for making any kind of database
operations.
I have mentioned Bean Managed transactions in my ejb-jar.xml
I am not using entity beans.
From the above test it is expected that the first insert(a) should get
rollback.
but it is not so happening with my case.
Am I wrong somewhere in Using Transaction Concept ?
Is there anyplace where i have missed some configuration setting ? somewhere
in my connection pool ?
in ejb-jar.xml ? in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml ?
Any one can help me with this problem ? Any examples ? any links ?
I am using weblogic 5.1 service pack 10 on windows 2000 machine. Is
transaction supported with that ?
Can anyone help me in these regard ?
Thanks in advance.
Bhavin Raichura--
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Rescheduling using transaction V_V2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for