Resolution too high with Reader X standard

We installed Reader X on our computers, all of the sudden the file sizes of all of the pdf's are around 20 megs. Can't find anywhere to adjust the resolution?

If I right click on the file and look at properties.....
If I convert any file to a pdf, whether converting word doc, or a jpg the new pdf takes forever to open, I assumed that meant the file size was now giant. You are saying that it has nothing to do with the conversion to a pdf?

Similar Messages

Resolution too high for monitor

hi again, i had some problems installing arch linux, so i quit and tried ubuntu, but it seems that he doesnt like me and my ati card, so i couldnt get the cube and all efects working.
so here i am again, my problem was:
i install arch
make all updates
install gnome and gnome extras etc
then, i run "x -configure"
create an account
and i activate gdm (through the "rc.config" i thing)
now i get to the problem, when i try to start arch when it comes to the graphical enviroment, the screen goes blan and tell that can't support resolution, that its too high. should that be automatic? how can i solve the problem? driver problem, should i use my tft cdrom? help me please:(

DarkForte wrote:Try editing your xorg.conf by hand and removing the unsupported resolutions.
This can be done with a line that looks something like this:
Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
Make sure the highest resolution is the one your monitor supports.
Edit: that line goes below the "Depth" entries in the "Screen" section (usually near the bottom) of xorg.conf.
Last edited by peets (2008-01-04 02:16:55)

Accidentally set my screen resolution too high

I was playing around with screen resolutions and accidentally set one too high and now every time i load up my Computer, it says 'Input not supported' , please help me.

It would help greatly if you:
A) Identified the installed operating system
B) Identified your HP desktop PC. (look on the service tag. Post the complete p/n
If your OS is Windows 7, start the operating system in Safe Mode. Press the power button and before Windows begins to boot, start tapping the F8 key. Choose Safe Mode. In Safe Mode click on the start button and type msconfig in the search all programs and files box . Click on the msconfig icon that appears above to invoke msconfig. In the msconfig dialog choose the Boot tab as in the following image. In Boot options put a tick inside the box to the left of base video, then click on apply and OK. Restart your PC and right-click an unused area on the desktop and set your resolution. Choose the recommended resolution. After you do that, go back to the msconfig and remove the tick mark in the Boot options -->Base video, click on OK and restart your PC. All should be back to normal again.
The desktop I am using has a dual display setup, so yours will appear a bit differently. the operatng system will recommend an optimal resolution and designate it as recommended.
Best regards,
erico
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

Screen resolution too high - text is tiny - how to change?

I'm a newbie to Audition, and spent 2.5 hours this weekend editing a 6.5 minute talk. Ended up with a massive headache, largely because of the small size of the text in the screen menues, etc.
Anyone know how to change these? I Use a MS Surface 3 pro with very high resolution (21160*1440) with a 22" screen set at 1680 *1050 (max for the screen) .
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
Pounding head...
Mike Bland

You don't mention which version of Audition you are using, but support for High DPI displays was added to Audition and other Adobe applications last year. This adds support for icon and text scaling, which is configured at the OS level. Found a good overview and write-up about this at How to Make the Windows Desktop Work Well on High-DPI Displays and Fix Blurry Fonts but the quick-and-dirty method is to right-click on your Windows desktop and choose Screen Resolution then click on the item Make text and other items larger or smaller. There, you can select scaling at 125% and 150%. You'll probably need to log back into your Windows account for the change to take effect.

Muvo - volume is too high with new firmw

Hi.
I have a Muvo TX 52 mb with usb2.0, and when i upgraded the firmware to .3.something some months ago i got a problem:
I cant decrease the volume enough with the new firmware!:angry: With the old firmware was volume setting "" very low, and the maximum volume wasnt very high. The new firmware has better mawimum volume but the minimum volume is too high... :-S Hope you understand what i mean.
Today i tried the latest firmware again, .2.02, but its STILL too high volume!
This is really driving me crazy, and propably i would need an OLD firmware (which is much worse in other ways), but i cant find any old firmware too download.
Please help me. Thanks!

I've mailed tech support now. If anyone has old firmware install, _please_ let me konwMessage Edited by muvotx on 07-03-2006 06:27 PM

Resolution too high for me

All of the current Mac Book Pros and Mac Books have a native screen resolution that makes it difficult for me to read without getting a head ache. I do not believe that I have special needs and I am not a senior (in my fourties). However I still prefer my old 1.67 GHz 15 PB with the 1280x854 resolution. In fact I was lucky to get one of these old ones. I really wanted to get an Intel book when they came out but I could not deal with that resolution. I actually had to return it. Reducing the resolution does not work either since only the native screen resolution looks sharp and crisp. I just came back from the Apple store since I really want to get a Mac Book Pro now. I thought that maybe the 17 inch would be better for me. Unfortunately its the same problem. Reading the menu items alone gave me a head ache. These computers seem to be made for teenagers. So is there a solution for me such as a new graphic card or a replacement screen that would make it easier for "seniors" like myself to use the computer?
15 inch PB Mac OS X (10.4.9) 1.5 GB

too me it is perfect, any higher would be really really pushing it.
the resolution is great for production type work, animation, photography, film, design, illustration, etc. but maybe not the best for business type work.
I am 20 and have become very adapted to reading tiny text, just in general i think, not just on computer screens but with everything.
1680x1050 on a 17" when Apple uses 1680x1050 on their 20" monitors, but that is just how it works, Apple is not manufacturing these displays so they have to stick to the standard sizes available.
Are you mostly at a desk with your laptop? or more taking it with you on your lap?
I am kind of suprized however, that their isn't a way to increase text size of the Mac UI, maybe their is??
if "Resolution Independence" turns out to work like it should, that will be a nice feature, and it should indeed solve your problem, if the whole UI is scalable like the icons, etc. are now.

Is it possible to make a photo's resolution too high

I am struggling with printing my christmas photos. I scanned my 8 X 10 photos at 1200 dpi which gave me a 9620 X 11936 file which is 38.3 MB. If I am patient enough...meaning hours of waiting...my PC will print the photos to my HP 1200 dpi printer using the Kodak EasyShare Software. These prints turn out great but it is too painful. iPhoto won't even print to the HP, preview, or save a pdf of them. I just want excellent quality prints and the 600 dpi looks bad. I'm also interested in trying out a book order. Can anyone help me figure out how to print these files? Is it possible to send files this large in for a large hardcover book order? If I need to drop my resolution how can I do it without rescanning? And last, What resolution will give me photo store quality prints from both my printer and if I order prints from the iPhoto program?
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.3) imac and tower

then save as TIF or JPEG.
Another really good alternative to TIFF or JPEG is PNG. PNG is a lossless file format that has about half the file size of a TIFF. I've been using it for scanning my slides.
The resolution you should scan at depends on:
1. The actual quality of your scanner. Is it really a full 1200 dpi scanner or is it interpolating to give that resolution. There are some other tricks that scanning software like Silverfast can do to decrease the noise and increase the dynamic range, that have more impact on image quality than sheer number of pixels.
2. The quality and nature of what you're scanning. For an 8x10 photo, 1200 dpi will just show up the grain in the photo paper. Same thing for scanning a 35mm slide at over 1600 dpi -- depending on the film stock, you may hit the resolution of the film before you max out the resolution of the scanner.
3. What you're going to do with the image. Obviously printing a very large print, or cropping down to a small portion of the frame requires more pixels (assuming they have real data in them). Prints from Kodak, etc., on photo paper actually require fewer pixels (150 dpi for the final print size) than printing from your inkjet or a photo book (which uses a halftone screen that does best with about 2x as many pixels as lines in the screen, or about 300 dpi).
Bottom line, the final number of pixels across for your scanned image is more significant than the so-called resolution you scan at. A good quality 1200x1600 pixel image is more than adequate for many purposes.

Screen Resolution Too Small With Bumblebee

I have a Thinkpad w540 which has optimus. I installed bumblebee and it certainly works. That is to say that it switches between the two graphics cards (I don't have power management down yet.). However, when I open a fullscreen game with bumblebee (specifically Bastion) the game opens in a very small windown in the top left corner of the screen. The rest of the screen is black. When I use bumblebee to open up the Nvidia control panel it seems that the resolution won't go greater than 640x480. My screen is 1920x1080.
Has anyone else experienced this and does anyone have a work around? I would love to be able to use both of the video cards that are on this laptop.

I'm a Gentoo user with precisely this problem (running Bastion through Bumblebee/Optimus on my W520, with a small window for Bastion but no similar problem for Amnesia: TDD). I don't suppose you know what AUR is doing to create the intelbastion script? I'd like to try replicating it in my ebuild.
EDIT: Hmm, looking elsewhere in this forum, it appears that "force_s3tc_enable=true bastion" makes the game work on my Intel card (rather than the nVidia one). Plus there are some useful Bash scripts here. Anyway, it would be nice to know if this is similar to what the intelbastion script is doing, nonetheless.
Last edited by trimeta (2012-06-13 05:01:05)

Power consumption in Connected Standby Mode too high with no obvious cause even in airplane mode

My Windows 8.1 tablet is draining at a rate of about 3% per hour or 833mW drain while in connected standby mode.
I have muted the sound and set the system to airplane mode, but still receive 3% drain per hour.
The PEP PRE-VETO rate and COUNT are 0. The DRIPS Histopgram has 100% at 32s. The top 5 offenders are all green with 0% active time.
The only value I am unsure about is IR TRUNCATE PERCENTAGE which on Microsoft's examples is always 0, but on my device it is 91% or higher. What does this mean?
Also is there anyway to find out why even though the sleepstudy looks fine I am getting such a high battery drain even with everything off in airplane mode?

Hi Tesmond
We might need more details about your device such as mode and Manufacturers.
And please keep your system, device driver and firmware up to date for good measure.
I think you are using sleep study to trace power usage. I didn’t found any information about IR TRUNCATE PERCENTAGE. I am supposing IR stand for Infrared. So we suggest you check if these is infrared port/connection device on your tablet.
Also confirm this issue with manufacturers to check if it is known issue caused by firmware or device driver.
Regards
D. Wu

Picture reject resolution too high.

The new HP 5520 I bought will not print pics via ePrint when the resolution is less than 100 dpi. I am taking it back if I can't change it. 72dpi is fine for many uses. HP just wants to force me to use more ink. Any way to change it?

Hi,
Viewing on normal computer screen, 72DPI is goo enough but printing photos at 72DPI you actually waste your inks. To get a better prints, you need al least 150DPI.
Hope this helps.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

Thunderbolt - everything too small to read at high res

I want to use my Thunderbolt at full resolution but everything is just too small to read without eventually getting a headache ! I bought a large screen to make reduce the strain.
Is there a way around this?

There is a fix!
I have a 30 inch monitor running at 2560 x 1600 with my Mac Mini and the outrageous $99 adapter from Apple. (Found it new for $60 on eBay.)
My menu bars and Google Chrome's tabs and bookmark bar were both way too small - like 4 point!
TinkerToolSystem, (not TinkerTool) allows you to go into hidden preferences and re-set to "HiDPI." Afer making the adjustment which doubled my DPI, I had to choose half the resolution 1280 x 800, but with no loss of real resolution! Things did get bigger elsewhere but I was able to adjust most of them. Hooray! GL!
Download the Evaluation copy of TinkerToolSystem. You get to open it 5 times for free.
http://www.bresink.com/osx/300321023/Docs-en/pgs/System.html
About halfway down, under "Screen."
For Snow Leopard
By default, Mac OS X assumes that the display screen is rendering graphics with a resolution of 72 pixels per inch. This policy was taken over from the classic Mac OS. While this basic assumption was true when the Macintosh was introduced more than 20 years ago, today's display devices often have a much higher resolution. The pixels have become smaller, so your screen may actually use e.g. 100 pixels per inch. In practice, this means that graphical elements, for example fonts, will be displayed too small, so a 12 point font selected in an application might no longer match the actual size of a 12 point font printed in a book when you compare screen and book side by side.
To accommodate these changes, Mac OS X is capable of using arbitrary display resolutions. TinkerTool System allows you to change the resolution between 36 and 216 pixels per inch. If the screen display stays the same, the screen contents will be displayed larger when you set a higher resolution, and smaller when you set a lower resolution.
For Lion and Mt.Lion
Apple has removed the feature from the operating system that allowed to control the physical resolution of screen output by an infinitely variable factor. As of 10.7 or later, this function was replaced by the feature HiDPI (High Number of Dots per Inch) which allows to double the physical resolution only. This means you can select between the discrete values 72 ppi and 144 ppi (or 288, 578, … ppi in the far future). Other magnification steps or scaling down are no longer available. The HiDPI strategy allow OS X to be used on ultra-high-resolution screens (“retina displays”).
Enabling the HiDPI feature requires two steps. The first step is to unlock HiDPI mode via TinkerTool System. The second step is to select one of the HiDPI display resolutions on the pane Displays ofSystem Preferences. Perform the following steps to work with HiDPI display modes:
Select the item Screen in the pane System.
Switch between the two possible modes Hide HiDPI resolutions and Display HiDPI resolutions.
Log out to let the change take effect.
When you log in again, you can launch System Preferences, go to Displays and choose one of the HiDPI settings shown in the table Display > Resolutions.
WARNING: The display resolution is a very critical setting. If you set the resolution too high, the windows can become so large that they no longer fit on screen. This means you can no longer see or control all parts of some applications which can make your system unusable!
To use the system with 144 ppi, a screen with at least 2048 x 1536 pixels is strongly recommended, because OS X applications are designed by the rule that they can expect windows to have a minimum size of 1024 x 768 pixels at 72 ppi.
The Retina Displays may lead to a software update and then we will all be happy.

Alert: Logical disk transfer (reads and writes) latency is too high Resolution state

Hi
We are getting following errors for my 2 virtual servers. We are getting this alert continuously. My setup Windows 2008 R2 SP1 2 node Hyper V cluster. Which is hosted 7 guest OS out of am facing this problem with to guest os. Once this alert started
my backup running slow.
Alert: Logical disk transfer (reads and writes) latency is too high
Source: E:
Path: Servername.domain.com
Last modified by: System
Last modified time: 4/23/2013 4:15:47 PM Alert description: The threshold for the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter has been exceeded.
Alert view link: "http://server/OperationsManager?DisplayMode=Pivot&AlertID=%7bca891ba3-e9f2-421f-9994-7b4d6e867b33%7d"
Notification subscription ID generating this message: {F71E01AF-0BE6-8377-7BE5-5CB6F5C037A1}
Reagrds
Mahesh

Hi,
Please see if following helps
Disk transfer (reads and writes) latency is too high
The
threshold for the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter has been exceeded
If they are of no help, try asking this question in Operations Manager - General forum since alerts are generated by SCOM.
Regards, Santosh
I do not represent the organisation I work for, all the opinions expressed here are my own.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Disk Transfer (reads and writes) Latency is Too High

i keep getting this error:
the Logical Disk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter has been exceeded.
i got these errors on the following servers:
active directory
SQL01 (i have 2 sql clustered)
CAS03 (4 cas server loadbalanced)
HUB01
MBX02(Clustered)
a little info on our environment:
*Using SAN storage.
*Disks are new ,and working fine
*the server has GOOD hardware components(16-32 Gb RAM;Xeon or quadcore........)
i keep having these notifications everyday; i searched on the internet and i found the cause to be 1 of the 2:
1) disk hardware issue( non common=rarely )
2) the queue time on the hard-disk( time to write on the Hard-disk)
if anyone can assist me with the following:
1) is this a serious issue that will affect our enviroment?
2) is it good to edit the time of monitoring to be 10minute(instead of the default 5min)
3) is there any solution for this?(to prevent these annoying -useless??--- notifications)
4)what is the cause of this queue delay;;and FYI sometime this happens when nothing and noone is using the server (i.e the server is almost Idle)
Regards

The problem is.... exactly what the knowledge of the alert says is wrong. It is very simple. Your disk latency is too high at times.
This is likely due to overloading the capabilities of the disk, and during peak times, the disk is underperforming. Or - it could be that occasionally, due to the design of your disks - you get a very large spike in disk latency... and this trips the
"average" counter. You could change this monitor to be a consecutive sample threshold monitor, and that would likely quiet it down.... but only doing an analysis of a perfmon of several disks over 24 hours would you be able to determine specifically
whats going on.
SCOM did exactly what it is supposed to do.... it alerted your, proactively, to the possible existence of an issue. Now you, using the knowledge already in the alert, use that information to further investigate, and determine what is the corrective
action to take.
Summary
The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer (LogicalDisk\Avg. Disk sec/Transfer) for the logical disk has exceeded the threshold. The logical disk and possibly even overall system performance may significantly diminish which will result in poor operating system and application
performance.
The Avg. Disk sec/ Transfer counter measures the average rate of disk Transfer requests (I/O request packets (IRPs)) that are executed per second on a specific logical disk. This is one measure of storage subsystem throughput.
Causes
A high Avg. Disk sec/Transfer performance counter value may occur due to a burst of disk transfer requests by either an operating system or application.
Resolutions
To increase the available storage subsystem throughput for this logical disk, do one or more of the following:
â€¢
Upgrade the controllers or disk drives.
â€¢
Switch from RAID-5 to RAID-0+1.
â€¢
Increase the number of actual spindles.
Be sure to set this threshold value appropriately for your specific storage hardware. The threshold value will vary according to the diskâ€™s underlying storage subsystem. For example, the â€œdiskâ€ might be
a single spindle or a large disk array. You can use MOM overrides to define exception thresholds, which can be applied to specific computers or entire computer groups.
Additional Information
The Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter is useful in gathering throughput data. If the average time is long enough, you can analyze a histogram of the arrayâ€™s response to specific loads (queues, request sizes, and so on). If possible, you should
observe workloads separately.
You can use throughput metrics to determine:
â€¢
The behavior of a workload running on a given host system. You can track the workload requirements for disk transfer requests over time. Characterization of workloads is an important part of performance analysis and capacity planning.
â€¢
The peak and sustainable levels of performance that are provided by a given storage subsystem. A workload can either be used to artificially or naturally push a storage subsystem (in this case, a given logical disk) to its limits. Determining these
limits provides useful configuration information for system designers and administrators.
However, without thorough knowledge of the underlying storage subsystem of the logical disk (for example, knowing whether it is a single spindle or a massive disk array), it can be difficult to provide an optimized one size fits all threshold value.
You must also consider the Avg. Disk sec/Transfer counter in conjunction with other transfer request characteristics (for example, request size and randomness/sequentially) and the equivalent counters for write disk requests.
If the Avg. Disk sec/Transfers counter is tracked over time and if it increases with the intensity of the workloads that are driving the transfer requests, it is reasonable to suspect that the logical disk is saturated if throughput does not increase and
the user experiences degraded system throughput.
For more information about storage architecture and driver support, see the Storage - Architecture and Driver Support Web site at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=26156.

Are JPEG 3504x2336 pixel pictures too high resolution for the photo books?

Hi,
I am done creating my photo book and I am ready to order, but I'd like to know if my pictures are too high resolution. They are professional wedding pictures so they are 7.4 mb each JPEG 3504x2336 pixel pictures. (Last time, I printed through MyPublisher but the pages with multiple pictures didn't turn out well and they said it was because the resolution was too high so when they compressed the file for the pages with multiple pictures it didn't turn out well.) Will I run into the same problem if I print directly through Iphoto?
If I do need to lower the resolution, how do I do it, given that I've aready created the book?
Thanks for any help you can give me!

Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
When you order the book it will be compressed and a PDF will be created. That PDF is what gets uploaded to Apple (via Kodak) for printing. So the best way to check your book before ordering is to create a PDF, then inspect it. Chances are, what you see in your PDF is what you will get printed.
To do this, select your book and do File > Print. You'll get an "Assembling book" progress bar. That can take several minutes. When done, you get the Print Dialog box. Click the PDF button and choose "Save as PDF..." Choose a name and location for the file (the Desktop is convenient) and Save. Then switch to the Finder and open that PDF in Preview. You might select a page or two and do a test print yourself, to see if the quality looks good. The PDF saves you from having to print out the whole book yourself to check for errors.
Regards.

I've downloaded CS 5.5 on a new Lenovo with Windows 8.1. The application area is too small to read. Why?

I want to know why the Adobe Audition CS 5.5 loads on my new Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro with Windows 8, but the application window fonts are too small to read.

The device is probably equipped with a High DPI display. The most recent releases of Audition CC (7.1 and above) support High DPI displays, but older editions do not. You can reduce your resolution or adjust how fonts and text are scaled at your current resolution in the Windows Display Settings control panel to help improve this, but the need for multi-resolution assets and text support did not exist when Audition CS5.5 was released.

Resolution too high with Reader X standard

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for