Resource Consumption between WLP 8.1 and 10.3

Hi there,
Is there any document about comparison in term of performance and resource consumption between the same portal application running on version 8 or 10?
Thanks.

No.
In all probability the bottleneck will be your application, not the portal framework, so any test would need to be done for your application.
Weblogic Server is definitely faster and JDK1.5 is way faster than 1.4 so you would see improvements.
regards
deepak

Similar Messages

Fixed PPM/PDS resource consumption and fixed PPM/PDS material consumption

hi experts
while going through help.sap to find out the meaning of linear optimization i came across two phrases ""fixed PPM/PDS resource consumption and fixed PPM/PDS material consumption"" i have worked on SCC03 PPM and curto_simu PDS but i couldn't make out what these phrases means . my perception is that every shop floor operator is given a target to produce certain number of quantities per shift on a production line .Does these phrase means that ?? or it has some other connotation. ??
experts can you please provide clarity on those phrases.what does it actually mean ?

sahu it is even more confusing see "Fixed PPM consumption is the fixed time required independent of quantity produced.""
fixed time of what ?? is it the resource timing or shift timing
Time required to produced material consumption quantity = Fixed cons + variable cons
can i say it is the time required to produce a given lot size quantity ??
sahu would you please put it in very layman terms.

Difference between Price indicator V and S posted as consumption.

I am facing a problem with price indicator.
For halb material with price indicator S, the system post the difference between Price indicator V and S as consumption.
If i have already maintained the price indicator as standard price why the system calculates the difference between the moving average price and standard price.
please help.
Regards,
Sumit Jain

Thank you for the responses Wonkanoby and Doctor Stu...
Now i only have 3 questions left... #2 #3 #4
Questions
#1) Are there any other differences between the boards apart from the fact that the K7N2GM-V is newer?
Answer : There are no OCing options
#2) i noticed while browsing the Motherboard Comparison Chart that the K7N2GM-V is labeled as a "400" while the K7N2GM2-LSR is labeled as a "dual 400" under the "Memory Bus" section. Can someone please explain what this means...
#3) i noticed the K7N2GM-V is labeled as a NVIDIA nForce2 IGP 64 chipset while the K7N2GM2-LSR is labeled as a NVIDIA nForce2 IGP. Could someone please explain what the difference is between the 2?
#4) Where are the mobo manuals.. ive been all over the site and cant find any.. i could only find manuals on the www.msi.com.tw website and they didnt have the manual for the K7N2GM-V there..
Thanks in Advance
Eddie

Difference in Resource management between PPM and MRS

We have SAP CRM opportunities, PS Projects (no networks), No Plant Maint, No CS, Resources around 600, multi skill set tracking, global resource management pool, CATS timesheet.
is it necessary to install MRS for resource management or is PPM RM functionality sufficient?

Hi Salim,
within PPM Resource Management you can staff resources to roles of the project and assign these to tasks. You can have a staffing directly within the project or there is a cross-project view in the Resource Management role of PPM. In PPM there are different scenarios who is allowed to staff (e.g. project lead, resource manager, extended process using candidate manager).
The demand on the role level can be defined either as a block without distribution (e.g. 40 days between 01.01.2013 and 31.12.2013) or distributed on monthly or weekly level (e.g. 2 days in Jan, 2 days in Feb).
Since MRS is a dedicated Resource Management tool there are additional functions in MRS.
It depends on your process if you require these in your scenario or nor. These addtional features e.g. include amongst other
- Graphical Visualization of the resource demands and staffings (see screenshot below)
- planning down to a daily level
- more flexible definition of multiple responsible resource managers
- optimized for handling of huge number of resources/requests
So as I wrote earlier it will probably not be possible to say what you should use without knowing the detail requirements.
Regards, Andrea

Does hiding controls/indicators on the front panel significantly effect computer resource consumption?

I remember reading something about transparent controls and indicators leading to overhead processing... does hiding controls/indicators have similar or ANY negative effects?

There's a difference between "effecting resource consumption" and "affecting resource consumption" - I assume you mean "affect".
There's a difference between a transparent control and a hidden control - Hidden means the VISIBLE property is set to FALSE, and certain optimizations can be done - it doesn't have to draw anything. If a control is set to transparent, it will still go through the motions of converting that integer to text (or whatever), and then draw nothing (the decision is made later, so more time is taken).
A transparent control can still react to mouse clicks. A hidden one cannot.
It shouldn't affect any memory consumption, except for a video frame buffer.
It's not clear from the question whether you mean the ACT of hiding t
hem (the turning OFF of the visible property), or the fact that they may be hidden.
Steve Bird
Culverson Software - Elegant software that is a pleasure to use.
Culverson.com
Blog for (mostly LabVIEW) programmers: Tips And Tricks

Connection between CRM back end and ASP front end website for Ecommerce

Hi All,
I want to establish the connection between a ASP website and CRM back end server(we are replacing th existing ERP back end system with SAP CRM ).
I want to know whether I have to go with XI or any other connectors provided by SAP to establsih the communication between the existing ASP website and CRM back end server..
Can anyone please help me out.
Thank you,

Okay here is the general concept for your scenario:
-You will call standard/custom RFC's(could be BAPI's) in the CRM system from the existing application.
-You will need to write a new model layer in your ASP application that calls the RFC layer in CRM
-You decide what data you want to use from CRM in your application
Let's assume at minimum you will want to use the product master, business partner master, and business transactions. You will need RFC's/BAPI's for every interaction point where you will consume/publish data to CRM.
So when an user creates an order from your e-commerce site, you will need to support saving an order in CRM. This is example of how you need to map out each function in your existing site to a part of the CRM system. Since we don't know what your site currently does, this is something you would have to do.
Once you have mapped out the business level data to the CRM system, then you can evaluate where you will need a BAPI and/or RFC call. Once that is done, then you can look at the CRM system and see what standard pieces can be called. Then everything else is custom development. Your ASP application will call CRM via RFC.
It is possible to do what you want to do, but it is going to require a lot mapping work and a fair amount of development effort to integrate the two pieces. I don't know if you might be better off looking at the SAP Internet Sales Solution instead so you could focus only customizing that application, instead of worrying about an integration problem. It just depends on how much special functionality your existing e-commerce site has today.
My general recommendation would be for you to hire a consultant that has done an SAP e-commerce project using SAP CRM in the past and let them guide you on the implementation issues. An on-site resource could better answer your "high-level" questions.
However if you have more questions please ask and I will try to answer to the best of my knowledge.
Good luck,
Stephen

Resource consumption in different bucket

Hi all,
we have some planned orders which are created by optimizer and they
have start date and end date are in different bucket then the total
resource consumption is showed in the bucket where start date of the
order fall. that means actually there is no over consumption of
resource and production is falling under next bucket as per end date.
When we observe the same in capacity planning book its showing in some
buckets as capacity over loaded and production is showing in next
bucket. Logically it should not the case.
Kindly suggest how to proceed in this senario
Thanks in advance.
Regards

THX

Differences between XI 3.0 and XI 7.1

Hi Guys,
Can some one tell the main and major diffrerences between XI 3.0 and XI 7.1 ?
or
Send me some information where I can look for the same.
thanks
Murali

Hi Muralidhar Karnati ,
SAP NWPI v7.1 is designed to cover all integration needs for SAP or non SAP customers.
The new functionality provided by NWPI v7.1:
A new Enterprise Services Repository which can be used both at design time and run time. The repository is "high volume ready" and supports UDDI v3.0. The repository implements governance processes and offer a central visibility of the services and their artifacts. The repository is of course loaded with SAPs enterprise services classification and enterprise services definitions.
Full support for the latest web services standards including WS-Policy, WS-TX and support for WS-ReliableMessaging (WS-RM).
Support for incoming message validation using XML Schema
Support for Events which are a key element of the product. It introduces the notion of Global Events available across all processes to be reacted upon.
Message bulking for asynchronous invocations has been introduced which helps throughput by a factor of 3 to 4.
Support for principal propagation which is a pre-requisite for building composite applications.
NWPI v7.1 is built on a JEE 5 foundation which helps memory consumption. However, it appears that NWPI does not support WS-BPEL (other than as an import format), BPEL4PEOPLE, SCA or SDO just yet.
Folders are introduced with the development tools in NW PI 7.1. Learn the pros and cons of using folders in PI 7.1 to organize projects and interfaces. XI 3.0 is the XI protocol valid for both SAP NetWeaver ´04 and SAP NetWeaver 7.0.
SAP® Exchange Infrastructure 3.0: Demo Examples
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d46b9b90-0201-0010-ef92-9964c1bc98e1
Implementing a Distributed Two-Phase-Commit Scenario with Web Services and SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00ffdb4d-e869-2a10-7688-891d7eea1b12
Preview of Web Services Reliable Messaging in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/304335f7-f33c-2a10-ae80-9c9ffdc86415
cheers!
gyanaraj
****Pls reward points if u find this helpful

Difference between a WEB service and a Enterprise Service?

Can Anybody explain me the difference between a WEB service and a Enterprise Service?

Hi Anilkumar K Naidu ,
Web service
A Web service is a self-contained, modularized functionality, which can be published, discovered, and accessed across a network using open standards and which is supported by SAP NetWeaver. Web services cover services provision for integration within an enterprise as well as cross enterprises on top of any communication technology stack, whether asynchronous or synchronous, in any format.
Web Services in the NetWeaver framework play an important role in facilitating the integration of disparate applications from various departments or trading partners and thus increasing business productivity. This benefit allows small and medium businesses also to integrate their business applications with larger trading partners. The benefit derived from this seamless integration introduces security concerns when all the business logic is now being exposed through a standard interface that is a catalyst for security vulnerabilities. SAP Security Managers must use automated diagnostics tools to ensure that the security vulnerabilities are caught in pre-production and in post-production phase.
Web Services Testing: SAP Netweaver Platform
http://www.crosschecknet.com/web_services_testing_SAP.php
How Web services play a key role on the SAP NetWeaver
http://www.sap.info/public/INT/int/index/Category-28943c61b1e60d84b-int/0/articlesVersions-500244687cbd30ffd
How to develop a Simple Web Service Application Using SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio & SAP XI 3.0
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5f3ee9d7-0901-0010-1096-f5b548ac1555
How To... Set Up a Web-Service Related Scenario with SAP xi
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/befdeb90-0201-0010-059b-f222711d10c0
Enhancing Your Web Services with SAP Exchange Infrastructure
http://www.sappro.com/downloads/SAPXI.pdf
Web Services, Part XI: Consuming Multiple Web Services
http://www.webreference.com/js/column106/
Vulneribility assesment of SAP Web Services
http://www.crosschecknet.com/resources/white_papers/sap_va.pdf
Enterprise Service
Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture (Enterprise SOA)
Enterprise SOA is a blueprint for an adaptable, flexible, and open IT architecture for developing services-based, enterprise-scale business solutions. With SAP NetWeaver as a technical foundation, enterprise SOA moves IT architectures to higher levels of adaptability and moves companies closer to the vision of real-time enterprises by elevating Web services to an enterprise level.
An enterprise service is typically a series of Web services combined with business logic that can be accessed and used repeatedly to support a particular business process. Aggregating Web services into business-level enterprise services provides a more meaningful foundation for the task of automating enterprise-scale business scenarios.
SAP Enterprise Services Architecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAP_Enterprise_Services_Architecture
ENTERPRISE SERVICEORIENTED ARCHITECTURE DESIGN, EVELOPMENT,AND DEPLOYMENT
http://download.sap.com/platform/esoa/brochures/download.epd?context=FB8D5E235B637255604CD1EDB755014400C523BC4E4632245A59C838A212B5F04C71A43F8B38FC591628F4C698D8CAA859405AA974284758
Enabling Enterprise Services
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/80/be7042f1e6d242e10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Enterprise Service-Oriented Architecture
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/enterprisesoa
Define Enterprise Services using the Enterprise Services Community
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/define-es
Enterprise service bus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_service_bus
Enterprise Services Workplace
http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTgwMCZkPW1pbg==)/flddisplay.asp
cheers!
gyanaraj
****Pls reward points if u find this helpful

Do we have a way to get the differences between xtext model before and after partial parse?

Do we have a way to get the differences between xtext model before and after partial parse?
As an example i have file contains 4 lines, xtext parsed this file and generated its model, then i made small modification in line number 3, so xtext partially parsed the file and generated another model.
The question is could we get the nodes that has been deleted from the model?
could we get the new nodes added to the model?
could we get the differences between the two models?

Workflow {
bean = StandaloneSetup {
scanClassPath = true
platformUri = "${runtimeProject}/.."
// The following two lines can be removed, if Xbase is not used.
registerGeneratedEPackage = "org.eclipse.xtext.xbase.XbasePackage"
registerGenModelFile = "platform:/resource/org.eclipse.xtext.xbase/model/Xbase.genmodel"
component = ParseXextModel{
//Load the xtext model and keep the reference of the inmem model
component = DirectoryCleaner {
directory = "${runtimeProject}/src-gen"
component = DirectoryCleaner {
directory = "${runtimeProject}/model/generated"
component = DirectoryCleaner {
directory = "${runtimeProject}.ui/src-gen"
component = DirectoryCleaner {
directory = "${runtimeProject}.tests/src-gen"
component = Generator {
pathRtProject = runtimeProject
pathUiProject = "${runtimeProject}.ui"
pathTestProject = "${runtimeProject}.tests"
projectNameRt = projectName
projectNameUi = "${projectName}.ui"
encoding = encoding
language = auto-inject {
uri = grammarURI
// Java API to access grammar elements (required by several other fragments)
fragment = grammarAccess.GrammarAccessFragment auto-inject {}
// provides a compare view
fragment = compare.CompareFragment auto-inject {}
component = ParseXextModel{
//Load the xtext model again and keep the reference of the inmem model
component = CompareModel {
//Implement this using EMF Comapre to see the differnces between 2 models
}

Resource Consumption

Hi,
We are using CTM to create PP/Ds order using PP/DS PPM, we have used Multimixed resource in the PPM definition.
The number of capacities defined is 3 and available time is 24 Hrs, so total available capacity for a day is 72 Hrs.
Now when we are planning for demand of 72 KG with throughput as 1Kg per Hr, the system should schedule the order at the start of the day and complete the order in one day assuming that 100% resource capacity is available.
But when we take the CTM run it is creating a Planned Order which occupies the capacity of one resource for 3 days, i.e. it occupies only 1/3rd capacity and remaining 2/3rd capacity is idle.
The expected result for me is that the system should consider the total available capacity irrespective of the no of capacities defined for the resource and create one planned order even if it occupies multiple capacities for the same resource
Can anyone please suggest how I can consider single capacity for multiple resource of same type using CTM and PP/DS PPM.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanjog

Sanjog,
I have never done this in CTM, but in PP/DS you achieve this with splitting the orders across resources (work centers).
In ECC, in the routing, in the detail of the operation, set the 'required splitting' flag, and then set the number of splits at three (CA02).
Re-cif across (in order to eliminate confusion, it is probably best to delete the old PPM in APO first). Now, in your PPM, you will see in the PPM operation Mode, the Fixed continual consumption is '3' and the variable duration has been reduced to one/third of the original value.
Rgds,
DB49

Bridge between a relational DB and an XML based DB

Hi:
Iam implementing a repository which acts as a bridge between a relational db and an xml db, has any work already been done in this area ?

It seems to me you have 3 choices...
1. Re-invent the wheel from the ground up. Having been involved in both iFS and XML DB I can only comment that creating an repository on top of relational data is a non-trivial task, even when you have access to the database source code....
2. Abandon database independance and create a solution that leverages the features of Oracle XML DB. This will give you the quickest time to market.
3. Consider creating a facade over the Oracle XML DB resource API. Your facade would hand processing off to Oracle XML DB when the underlying database was 9iR2. In the case of earlier or non oracle databases you would need to implement more of the logic in the application layer.

Difference between " system.out.print( ) " and " system.out.println( ) "?

Hi frnds, i m a beginner in JAVA today only started with the complete refrence....can you help me and tell the the Difference between " system.out.print( ) " and " system.out.println( ) "?

Rashid2753 wrote:
hi,Yes. But it's a good idea for new Java programmers to become accustomed to using helpful resources like the API Javadocs because it's much faster then waiting for replies everytime you have a question. For experienced developers the API Javadocs are an indispensible resource.

Difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0

hi frnds
.what is the difference between SAP 4.7 and ECC 5.0?
regards

Hi,
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL

Exact Difference between Non Stock NLAG and Non Valuated UNBW Materia type

Dear All
What is the Exact Difference between Non Stock NLAG and Non Valuated UNBW Materia type?
I tried creating Purchase Order and found that accouting doc got created at both times and stock was not updated in MMBE for both material types.
Regards

Hi,
non-valuated material (Material Type UNBW):
This type of material is managed on a quantity basis, but not on a value basis. This makes sense for materials of low value, stocks of which nevertheless have to be monitored (for example, operating manuals).
Non-stock material (NLAG) (Material Type NLAG):
Inventory management is not possible for these materials either on a quantity or value basis. For frequently required consumables, the use of this material type nevertheless enables you to store the information required to create
purchasing documents (such as texts and units of measure).
When a material is procured directly for consumption, no material master record is necessary. In connection with consumable materials, you can distinguish between the following cases:
Consumable material without material master record
Consumable material with material master record that is not subject to
inventory management (on either a quantity or value basis)
Consumable material with material master record that is subject to inventory management on a quantity, but not a value, basis
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Resource Consumption between WLP 8.1 and 10.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for