Restoration workflow using lightroom

When I'm restoring old photos, I've used Photoshop as my main tool (with Katrin's Eismann's book as my bible). But now that I'm feeling pretty comfortable with LR3, I'm exploring when and where to use it in the process. I don't see doing away with PS completely -- too addicted to context-aware healing, multiply blend, etc -- but I'm open to advice along the lines of "you dope, don't you realize you replace Levels Adjustment Layer with..."
Typically, I like to do major repairs (tears, folds, dust) early - in PS. But I think I've already discovered that, once I complete the roundtrip from LR to PS, don't monkey again with LR Develop...? So, workflow suggestions much appreciated.

If you have pristine original photos and perfectly exposed scans, you may achieve good results using only LR. Also, most scanners allow you to apply some exposure adjustment, color correction, and sharpening during the scan image capture. If you prefer to take the time to setup your scanner software to apply these adjustments during the scan process, then you may achieve good results using LR only. The major drawback with this workflow is that certain photographs may require different adjustment settings, so you are back to “readjusting.” The other consideration is intended usage of the final image file. If it is for non-critical applications such as low-resolution web images, then a LR only workflow may be adequate. If you are “archiving” old less-than-perfect family photos here’s my workflow:
I use 16-bit/color ProPhoto RGB profile TIFFs with initial editing done in PS. Dust spot removal and other “small defects” are best fixed in PS "destructively." My results are always better by first making very basic black and white point adjustments and a single-point tone curve adjustment using a “non-destructive” curves adjustment layer in PS. I also add a very small amount of "capture sharpening in PS. which assist with the spot removal process. You can do this using your scanner software sharpening tools, but the setting will vary dependent on scan resolution and image print type (gloss, matte). All scan images just like camera RAW images need capture sharpening applied. You will apply final sharpening adjustments in LR based on target output and preference. Next I do spot and other small defect removal in PS and then import the file into LR for further editing. If I find more dust spots while processing the file in LR I can go back into Photoshop to remove them and resave the file. LR will update with the changes made in PS. I try to reserve LR’s non-destructive clone tool for “larger defects,” so I can remove or change them later. Unfortunately, the current LR clone and heal tools are limited in their flexibility compared to PS’s tools. If you find yourself piling on clone tool spots in LR and you’re still not pleased, move into PS. I find it’s much faster to correct difficult defects in PS.
You can certainly do all or most of these steps in LR, but my experience indicates it is much more difficult to achieve the best results with scanner images using only LR. Why? LR's tools have been specifically "tailored" for processing RAW digital camera images. Photo, slide and negative film media scans have their own set of peculiarities, which are far different from the “near perfect’ sensor output of digital cameras. IMHO you will achieve better results with your scan images by using both PS and LR, with as many (or few) iterations you desire. I leave the file open in PS and LR and find it doesn't slow my workflow at all. In fact I can process images faster with this workflow.
Either workflow you choose, Lightroom is the way to go for final editing, output and cataloging of your processed scan images.

Similar Messages

  • Using Lightroom Mobile to sync photos to desktop – proper workflow?

    Just wondering what people suggest as a workflow for importing photos taken on a cameraphone into a Lightroom library.
    I want the photos to be saved into the same folders on my hard drive that the rest of my photos go into (Pictures > 2014 > 8 > 3 etc). Using Lightroom Mobile and syncing with the desktop app works well, but the files aren't saved inside my library, are they ...
    Is there a way i can do this without physically importing them?

    Hi,
    it would be interesting to know exactly what you are doing here.
    Does it mean that you upload the images from your Lr Desktop?
    It might take a while before the sync is done.
    Which version of Lr are you using?
    If you compare Lr Mobile with lightroom.adobe.com - is there any difference?
    Does it help to update Lr Mobile to 1.2.1?
    Thanks,
    Ignacio

  • I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5.  When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different.  Why doesn't it appear edited?

    I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5.  When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different.  Why doesn't it appear edited?

    People who have Photoshop, but don't have Lightroom, need ACR so that they can use Raw files. Without ACR they could do nothing with those (they may also like having ACR so that they can work on other kinds of image using the same kinds of adjustments and techniques, as are used with Raw files).
    People who have Lightroom, can get access to Raw files regardless whether ACR is present or not. They can use Lightroom on other kinds of image also, using the same methods. LR can pass images directly into Photoshop without passing via ACR (or else does so transparently, which amounts to substantially the same thing).
    ACR does not, strictly speaking, even need to be installed for this external editing to happen. In fact, not even PS needs to be - since a different image editor can be used instead, while still retaining the Adobe Raw conversion etc.
    Lightroom "subcontracts out" specialised external tasks, in this workflow, but is still your "main contractor": the image is otherwise located, viewed, managed, adjusted/presented and output entirely using LR.
    So IMO we can divide image processing into:
    operations that involve pixels and layers and layer masks and adjustment layers etc (of the kind done inside Photoshop)
    operations that involve parametric edits (of the kind done in ACR where you are not using a Lightroom based workflow; otherwise, done inside Lightroom)
    When PS is called in, that's because those tasks are impossible or unsuitable to do in Lightroom. But those tasks can't be done in ACR either - by definition, since LR and ACR have exactly the same image processing "feature set".
    Lightroom is irrelevant to the Bridge + ACR + PS workflow. This workflow requires both your PS and your ACR to be current enough, to support your Raw format etc.
    ACR and Bridge are irrelevant to the LR + (image editor) workflow. It is in this case, only LR which needs to be current enough to support your Raw format etc.
    RP

  • Using Lightroom as my external editor - worked, now broken

    For nearly two years, I used Lightroom as my external editor for iPhoto using the following process:
    1. Select 'Edit in External Editor'
    2. Select Add to Library (not Copy or Move) when the Lightroom import dialogue comes up so that LR is simply pointing to the file my iPhoto library
    3. Make all my edits in Lightroom (my original is left untouched at this point, and LR stores data about how to process the original)
    4. Export the photo from Lightroom into the same folder as the original using the same filename
    At this point, I would get a prompt saying:
    "The following files already exist:
    [path/to/file]
    Do you wish to overwrite the existing files, skip the existing files, or rename the exported files to avoid collision?"
    I could simply choose 'Overwrite' and my file in iPhoto would be updated with the changes from LR.
    This worked until right after Christmas. Then, in January, the process mysteriously stopped working for any new photos. Now, if I use the same process, I get the following warning:
    "You can not choose to overwrite the existing files since some of them are the source files"
    Interestingly enough, I can still go back to any of the pre-January images in my LR library and export them back into iPhoto, overwriting the original. I have not updated Lightroom at all, but I suspect I did download an update to iPhoto. Still, I can't figure out what is materially different, and what I might be able to do to get my old workflow back!
    Any ideas? And no, I don't need a lecture about the fact that iPhoto and LR are both image library managers, and that I should just switch to LR or use Aperture. I like the way iPhoto organizes my files (Events, Places, etc) and I only end up needing to edit 20% of the photos in an external editor. LR is definitely the editor I prefer and I'm not crazy about Aperture.
    Thanks dudes!

    Larry you fail to mention that using an external editor with iPhoto will not allow you to save your changes back into the iPhoto library.
    Unfortunate you simply are ignorant of how iPhoto works - when you use an external editor with iPhoto and save the edited photo it is returned to the iPhoto database and the iPhoto database is updated correctly.
    There are many Apple apologists on these forums
    No - but since these forums are for iPhoto support the users here are very experienced iPhoto users and do use iPhoto a lot - no apologies - just CORRECT information on how to use iPhoto (and if it will not doe what you want sometimes suggestions on where to go to do what yo want)
    and they will either try to convince you that other software is not as good
    I certainly have NEVER seen this - every piece of software has good and bad points - and again remember *this is an iPhoto support forum*.
    or totally ignore newbie users whom want to know how they can do something in iPhoto when it is not possible due to it's limitations.
    Once again this is simply incorrect - unfortunately you have no idea how iPhoto works or how to use it
    Rather, in my opinion I prefer to be honest
    Honest maybe - but very unknowledgeable
    and if another application does a function that iPhoto doesn't then I would personally point that out.
    Good plan - the problem is that you simply are ignorant of how iPhoto works and what it can do so con are posting erroneous information making false claims
    Your totally incorrect posts are unnecessary and could be confusing to users who want information - as the TOU state please TEST your assumptions before you post them here - totally incorrect posts like yours are not the least bit helpful
    LN
    Message was edited by: LarryHN

  • Using Lightroom in a group/corporate environment

    I've been excited in hopes that Lightroom would solve my department's problems with photo organization, but I didn't initially realize that it was not at all designed with multiple users in mind. So here are my questions:
    - Has anybody successfully set up or been using LR in a group environment? (Or unsuccesfully?) What have you tried that worked or didn't work?
    - Our photos are all stored on a shared network drive. My first thought was that if one person got all of the keywords, etc. set up for the photos we have, that information could be exported and then imported on everyone else's LR. I'm now not sure that's possible, but I'm still a bit confused by what's stored within the photo file and what's written to the database.
    - I had thought that at the very least, everyone could set up their own keywords and use Lightroom independently. But since we're all accessing the same set of photos, we're going to get in trouble there, aren't we?
    Suggestions? I've been trying to read some of the LR FAQs and sites, but I haven't had a lot of luck on this topic.

    Jay is right, of course. The problem is that even if you use it independently (by each user NOT writing to XMP)how do you then ever update the files themselves on the common network drive? Or, maybe that is not an issue with the way you work.
    On the other hand, the keywording is not the real problem--obviously if you are not all following the same keywording convention, then some images may have a lot of keywords associated with them, but that is livable in some senses. But, who does the image developing work--if several people are doing that and you are writing to XMP, then that might produce a lot of problems.
    I, of course, do not know your specific workflow, so these are simply speculations, but at the very least if you do not use LR independently on each machine, then you have a workflow assignment and organization challenge.

  • Using Lightroom for Event Photography

    I use Lightroom for my entire workflow at events that I cover where I will import from multiple memory cards throughout the day.
    One of my basic Import Settings will achieve 90% of what I need but I will still spend time with every customer, helping them choose the photographs that they want printing and I will crop, make adjustments etc.
    This is fine until we get busy, then it is harder to spend the quality time with each customer.
    My question is this:
    How can I change my hardware setup so that I can have two or more laptops - or even tablets - where I can share these images for viewing with all synced adjustments etc.?
    I can setup a local adhco network but i can not sync to the CC servers.
    My competitors often have multiple screens where customers can browse, choose and even print images they want to buy.
    I have tried simply exporting files to another laptop and viewing in a photo browser but this is clumsy, not ideal and takes up too much time.
    i understand there are database issues preventing me from sharing a single catalogue but there must be some way I can do this.
    I hate having customers waiting and sometimes leaving because they can not see their photos.
    Thanks for any help
    Darren

    Even if I just click the Printer button to verify my settings I should then return to Lightroom, and then click Print to start the job.  This does not happen, the job starts as soon as I close the properties dialog box.  Again, is any Lightroom processing or control being bypassed because of this?

  • Using Lightroom and Indesign CS5

    Hi,
    I used in the past Indesign CS3 to create a book.  It went fairly well.  that was before I started using Lightroom, which now holds my complete catalogue, edits, etc.
    I've recently proceeded to create Collections in Lightroom for three books I want to start working on.  I just downloaded Indesign CS5 trial.  I am wondering if there is Lightroom support in Indesign CS5?  I'd really want to have the ability to import photos directly from Lightroom without having to export them in a specific folder to work in Indesign.  It seems to me it would be a waste of disk space since exporting files would simply create duplicates; no to mention I'd need to re-export them every time I would create modifications to the files in Lightroom...
    I think this is a feature that has been requested here and there from Indesign users in CS4?
    Thanks,
    Martin

    The point of RAW or DNG is, as the name implies, is to create the digital equivalent of a "negative". A format where the original camera data is preserved and can be "developed" later—the development settings are not actually applied until the file is converted. The advantage of the format is obvious when you take a shot with the wrong camera settings.
    There's nothing forcing you to use the digital negative workflow. You could shoot an image format like .jpeg and use LR for content management and ID's Mini Bridge panel for placing.
    There isn't much point in making CMYK conversions in PS—InDesign is capable of making the same color managed conversion on export or print.

  • Using Lightroom with DXO Optics

    Hello,
    I've just started using Lightroom and on the advice of a friend, have also started using DXO Optics Pro. From what I have read, DXO is used to make global modifications and Lightroom to specific modifications. There does seem to be some overlap with features between the two products. My eye is not sharp enough to see differences, if any, in the adjustments I might make in DXO vs Lightroom such as tone curve, hue etc. I am wondering if anyone who has used DXO has noticed if DXO handles certain modifications better then Lightroom and visa versa. Am I really better off making most or all of my global changes in DXO?
    Thanks,
    Michael

    If you are working with raw data, you kind of have to decide at one point you'll lose that full capability using these two products. If you do lens correction or other work in Dx0, you'll have to pass partially processed (linear DNG) to LR so you're not really working with raw data any longer. That's an important consideration in the workflow. Anyway, there was a recent thread about this on Luminous Landscape, you might want to pick through it then come back and ask questions here (or there):
    Lightroom-DxO Round-Trip

  • Using Lightroom Mobile as travel downloader/editor

    Friends,
    I'm a new member of the Lightroom family.  I'd like to use Lightroom Mobile while traveling whereby I download RAWs (or RAWs and .jpegs) to my iPad, edit the images on my iPad, then easily sync/transfer those edits to my computer when I get home.  Is that possible?
    Thanks!
    Steve

    I don't think it matters that the iPad isn't colour managed (and LrM isn't designed for it). OK, it might if you are brave or stupid enough to make exhibition quality prints without reviewing the image on a real computer. Instead the adjustments on the iPad are ball park, equivalent to Quick Develop, they give you time to think about the image, try out crops, rate and flag etc. Your time in front of a monitor is then spent on fine tuning.
    An alternative workflow is possible if you get access to a real computer while you're travelling and if it has decent upload speeds. Log into your lightroom.adobe.com in a web browser and drag the photos from Explorer/Finder into a collection in the browser window. The raw file then uploads, and will be synced down to your computer when you get home. You can then make adjustments in LrMobile and avoid kludges like Syncomatic.
    Personally, I think the small laptop is still the way to go. For now anyway.

  • How to use Lightroom 5 [was: 6] to transfer related .WAV files for VISIBLE display next to my Nikon D4s NEFs?

    Please help me. The ability to do this crucial to my workflow as a photojournalist and columnist.
    Today I discovered that I have a serious problem when I tried to use Lightroom 5 to transfer my RAW images and their associated .WAV files from my Nikon D4s memory card. I did a search online and found that a Canon user has this same problem:
    Part way through the transfer a message box appeared on-screen telling me: "Some import functions were not performed. These files are not photos or videos," followed by a list of all of the .WAV files.
    I rely on those audio files to remind me of things that I need to know about for my column with regards to the associated photos. Sometimes I even use those short audio files to record sound effects.
    I am using a Mac running on the new Yosemite operating system.
    I like the fact that Lightroom does not do destructive editing vis a vis the added description and other metadata, as opposed to Nikon transfer which apparently does do "destructive editing," but I've been using Nikon Transfer 2 and, before that, previous versions of this program for years. I have never had an issue with corrupted photos due to the transfer process. This is a significant drawback for me of Lightroom 5.
    Surely many, if not most, people at Adobe use Canon and Nikon DSLR cameras, so why would they allow such a serious flaw to be in Lightroom 5?
    Am I missing a step that will eliminate this problem or is there a workaround for it?
    Thank you for your help.

    I entered the Library drop-down menu, clicked on "Find" and typed .wav in the search window. Lo and behold, only the 13 photos that had associated .WAV audio files were then visible in Library view.
    Hmm, I wouldn't have guessed that would work.  It doesn't work in my LR 5.7 -- it doesn't find any photos with associated .wav files.  I wonder what's different about your situation.  In your Library Filter bar, when you do Library > Find, what appears in the two red circles below?
    In my previous message, I was referring to the third-party plugins Data Explorer and Any Filter but forgot to include the links.  Though the two plugins are quite a bit different, they each give you the ability to specifically search for associated files with a given extension.

  • Using Lightroom on a Cloud with Two Computers / Different Cities

    I would like to use Lightroom on two Macs in two different cities.  What I would like to do is move photo files to a Cloud system such as Dropbox work with them on a computer in city A then travel to city B and work on them with a different computer.  I think this is possible if I also place the .ircat file for the pictures I'm working with in the same folder / Cloud system.  Will this work?  Thanks

    They've always been separate and I agree he doesn't have to sync them
    Yes, the previews themselves have always been separate from the catalog. But the "preview directory", i.e. the database tables that linked the images with their preview files, has been inside the catalog until LR3.
    That created a bit of a trouble for those that had a "copy entire catalog" workflow, the OP was talking about. Namely, even if you had all previews built on both machines, copying a catalog from machine A, invalidated the preview cache on machine B, since the "preview tables" were now pointing to different preview files. And we now that building a new cache takes many hours.
    Thankfully, in LR3 those tables had been moved to a separate SQLite database (previews.db file in the root of the preview cache).

  • New Nikon Workflow with Lightroom

    Just thought I would share my new workflow with everyone, in case anyone is not happy with the raw conversion provided by Lightroom and would rather use Capture NX to do the raw conversion on their files, but still use Lightroom for cataloging and ranking their photos (as well as exporting for web, etc).
    1. Copy all photos from memory card into a folder on your computer.
    2. Import the photos from your filesystem, using the "Copy photos to a new location and import" option. This is so you can work with a copy of the original, rather than the original.
    3. Do your normal process for choosing which photos you would like to take the time to process, and which you would like to just throw away. I use the pick/rejected flags for mine.
    4. Filter your photos by flag status, so only the picks are showing.
    5. Export your picks to a temporary folder somewhere. This is where you will do all your Capture NX processing. I call this folder "Lightroom to Capture Transfer". You want to choose the option to export the original file. I created an export preset called "Export For Capture NX" with these settings in it to make it easier in the future.
    6. Open the "Lightroom to Capture Transfer" folder in Capture NX using the built in file browser, and do all your raw adjustments to exposure compensation, white balance and noise reduction. All of which I find works better in Capture than in Lightroom. Save all your changes back into the same NEF file since Capture can save to the NEF format. Remember this file is just a copy of the original so we don't need to worry about making changes to our original raw file here. NOTE: Do NOT apply any sharpening here inside Capture since sharpening should be done at the end of your workflow. I shoot with my camera sharpening set to "None". If you haven't done this, you should set all your photos to sharpening "None" as part of your batch process in step 8 below.
    7. Set up a watched folder in Lightroom called "Lightroom Auto Imported Photos", and enable Auto Import.
    8. In Capture, create a batch process you can use to convert all your adjusted raw NEFs to tiff format. You will point the batch export to your Lightroom watched folder. As Capture batch converts all your raws to tiff, Lightroom will be importing them into your catalog.
    9. Now you should have a folder inside your Lightroom catalog called "Lightroom Auto Imported Photos". Open that folder, select ALL the photos in the folder and hit "P" to mark them all as picks. Trust me on this one. =)
    10. Now within Lightroom, drag all the photos at once into the folder containing your imported photos from step 2. You should see all your tiffs beside all your raw NEFs. And since you have a filter turned on to only show your picks in this folder, all your other non pick original raw files will be hidden.
    11. Again, select ALL the photos in this folder and "Stacking -> Auto Stack by Capture Time." In the dialog, drag the slider down to 1 second. This should for the most part stack all the same nefs with the corresponding tiffs. Unless you were doing a ton of burst shooting. In which case you can manually stack them. Lightroom seems to always put the original NEFs on the top of the stack.
    12. Select all the photos again, and "Stacking -> Move Down in Stack". This will bring all your processed tiffs to the top of the stack, and hide the nefs. This is exactly what you want. From here on out, you will be working on the tiffs.
    13. Do any final processing to your photos inside Lightroom. Saturation, cropping, spot removal, etc. I also do all my key-wording here. NOTE: I do not do ANY sharpening inside Lightroom because I've found the sharpening just doesn't do it for me personally. I will do all sharpening later in Photoshop after I export them from Lightroom. Your mileage may vary.
    14. Once my photos look the way I want, I then export them to JPEG. I have set up a Photoshop droplet fo

    14. Once my photos look the way I want, I then export them to JPEG. I have set up a Photoshop droplet for Lightroom that will then do all my sharpening after export.
    That's it! I know it sounds like a lot of steps, but once you've done it a couple of times it goes by really quick. I'm really loving most things about Lightroom in terms of its cataloging and export options. But the image quality of the Lightroom raw conversions just isn't there yet. I've found by integrating both Capture NX and Lightroom I can get top quality results while still gaining advantage of Lightroom's many nice features. It took me a few days of exploration and experimentation to nail down the optimal workflow for my needs. Hopefully this will help some others out and maybe give them some ideas of their own toward a better workflow.
    Please feel free to share your thoughts or own experience on all of this.
    Thanks to Tony Long for his suggestion in this thread, which caused me to go on a search for the optimal Lightroom/Capture workflow: http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?7@@.3bc719df/3
    If you are interested in taking a look at the final output of the workflow listed above, please look here: http://photos.unsavory.com/p634883589
    Cheers everyone!
    -©aine

  • How to restore workflow?

    Hi All
    I am working on Oracle Apps workflow on HR. I copied HRSSA and tried to save but it wasn't saved properly and also the original workflow is not saving now. I want to restore back the original workflow without reinstalling.
    Is it possible to do it?
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Regards
    Rahman

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to recover the workflow history.
    The workflow status in the workflow history list is used the Event Type.
    http://tjendarta.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/sharepoint-workflow-history-event-type/
    To recover the workflow history, you can refer to the following articles.
    http://www.fusecollaboration.com/Blog/archive/2011/10/10/recovering-workflow-history-after-60-days.aspx
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a13291be-73c5-440b-bc7d-c7c8f1833035/how-can-i-restore-workflow-history-and-tasks-deleted-by-the-workflow-auto-cleanup-job?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
    More reference:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/b15b27e2-3033-418b-9731-968273d7423e/missing-completed-workflows-history?forum=sharepointcustomizationlegacy
    http://snahta.blogspot.com/2009/01/workflow-auto-cleanup-days-fix.html
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • I was using Lightroom v5.6 when a notice came up to update to v5.7.  I did the down load but must have gotten a bad down load because it will not install.   And the old 5.6 on my desktop will not work.   So no 5.6 or 5.7 . any ideas  how to get something

    I was using Lightroom v5.6 when a notice came up to update to v5.7. So I did the download but it would not work or install.  And the 5.6 version will not work now either.   So I am screwed - no 5.6 or 5.7 and no access to Adobe Tech.   Any help will be appreciated.

    My iPod is a click wheel...I think that's fifth generation?
    I've always used my firewire cable to update my iPod. I've tried using USB in the past but for some reason it always says that my iPod has low battery and won't let me update it, so I just use firewire. Can I not use firewire with itunes 7?
    I'll try using the USB again. It's laying around here somewhere. Just gotta find it.

  • Using Lightroom Cloud to Sync Catalog Between Two Machines

    I have use of so many cloud services including the 20gb that Adobe gives me.  Is there a way i can sync my catalog on the cloud so that i can have all my metadata on both my laptop and desk top?  I also have 300gb of cloud storage though Copy.  I would just like some recomendations on how best to go about it. Thanks

    Hi Pat,
    Using Lightroom Cloud to Sync Catalog Between Two Machines
    If you’re running Lightroom on a laptop during your location shoots, you might want to take all the edits, keywords, metadata, and of course the photos themselves, and add them to the Lightroom catalog on your studio computer. It’s easier than it sounds: basically, you choose which catalog to export from your laptop, then you take the folder it creates over to your studio computer and import it.
    You need to decide whether you want to export a folder (all the imported photos from your shoot), or a collection (just your Picks from the shoot). In this case, we’ll go with a collection, so go to the Collections panel and click on the collection you want to merge with your main catalog back in your studio. (If you had chosen a folder, the only difference would be you’d go to the Folders panel and click on the folder from that shoot instead. Either way, all the metadata you added, and any edits you made in Lightroom, will still be transferred over to the other machine.)
    Please refer to http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1930499 for more details.
    Thanks!
    Eshant Jindal

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I increase the speed of LabView computing?

    Dear all, I have a problem which I didn`t thought to face. My problem is the folowing. I have Implemented some applications in Labview but with my great surprise the program is incredibly slow! One of these was just a simple try to produce sinusoidal

  • How access Adobe Flash Player Settings on Playbook Browser

    How do you gain access to the adobe Flash player settings? For example to select Display or Privacy or Microphone or Camera. On desktop it's done with a right click on the flash object on the page and select Settings... How do you bring up these sett

  • Connect ipod to two computers???

    Is there any way I can connect my ipod to two different computers without it wiping out all my music on my ipod? One is a Dell desktop (2005) and the other is an IBM thinkpad (2005).

  • Image of Doom crashes Safari

    Using Firefox or Camino, surf to http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000760.html and read the article. Now, surf to the same page using Safari and CRASH! Safari just disappears. Does anyone know why this happens? Is there a way to prevent

  • Encounter "500 Unexpected Error" when admin account access to ECP

    Symptom:  In Exchange 2013, when using admin account to access ECP, you will get an error “500 Unexpected” as below. However, when using the same account to access OWA, everything is ok, and other normal accounts can access OWA also. At the same time