Restricting Delegate Classloading for Resource Adaptor

I have an EAR application contains multilple EJB's and single Resource Adaptor. My EJB depends on some JARs which are under lib directory.
Now the problem is that I have a JAR abc.jar which are present under my my.ear/lib directory as well as under my Resource Adaptor i.e. my.ear/plugin-ra.rar#abc.jar, both are same but I want my Resource Adaptor to use the one which is inside my my.ear/plugin-ra.rar instead of one under my.ear/lib as this JAR loads my plugin present under Resource Adaptor.
Is there anyway I can configure my RA to use delegate=false at class loading using Application Server specific deployment descriptors, as this behaivour differs from each Application Server. This is currently working fine on jBoss 4.2.3GA without any configurations but fails on Glassfish3.0.1, WebSphere7 and WebLogic10.3.3.
Your comments and help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
SJunejo

if you enable enable-global-access-to-classes to true in weblogic-ra.xml, all classes inside RAR will be loaded in a classloader which is parent of all ear appliactions; if set to false, all classes inside RAR by default will be loaded by a sub-classloader of ear.
jars in EAR\lib are always loaded by EAR's classloader.
Put same jar in multiple places is not good practice any way.
My suggestion is to re-arrange your ear/rar to always just keep one copy of each jar.

Similar Messages

Version information for java resource adaptor

Hi,
Iam developing a resource adaptor(RAR). I have deployed my RAR on app server. My problem is that i want to provide version information of my RAR. One way is that i do the same in log files which iam doing presently. Problem is that logging is disabled in most production environment due to performance reasons.
Otherway is, instead of usual .log file, i write the version information in some .config file which I can create when my adaptor is loaded. Problem with this approach is that i can have mutiple RAR deployed on same app server connected to different instances of EIS. If app server has only single class loader, then this will be a problem as the RAR which is loaded later will override the previous info as only one copy of the file is created.
Can anyone suggest me a possible way.
Ashish

There is noy way for you to write a simple message to the app server log file when the RAR is inited stating the version of the RAR? You also mentioned dumping the RAR version to a file. Why can't you simply write the RAR version to a unique file name by adding a date stamp or some other unique identifier so you don't overwrite the previous file? Maybe I'm missing something.

Resource adaptor

I am trying to use the Resource Adaptor for IDM6 with Lotus Notes/Domino 7.x. Are there any issues?

i'm writin a program to extract info from SAP but i can't find where download the JCO.jar , in SAP site you need a user and password but i don't have it, dou you have already de jar file? could you send me tha jar? or may be i have to purchase that product? pleas help me!!!!
my addres is [email protected]

Inner jar looking for resources

I'm writing an application with a slightly complex jar structure like this:
main_application.jar
-- aux1.jar // located in a subdirectory with respect to main_app
---- aux1aux1.jar // located in a subdirectory with respect to aux1
---- aux1.aux2.jar
---- log4j.jar
-- aux2.jar
etc.
Now my problem is the following:
Let's assume that some class within aux1aux2.jar uses the Log4J logger which needs a config file which it expects on "the" classpath. I did several experiments to find out some systematic explanation but I didn't succeed so far.
Now my two questions:
1) What is the classpath the class Logger within log4j.jar actually uses? Is it the one of its own jar (which would mean that the config file must be placed besides log4j.jar; doesn't work, however) or the one of aux1 or even that of main_application?
2) How can I find out the real class path used by any class within a jar? System.getProperty("java.class.path") obviously doesn't tell me the truth, since the class may find classes/resources which are not on that classpath and doesn't find classes which should be found using the indicated classpath. As far as I have seen, there is no possibility to ask the standard ClassLoader for that path...
Dieter

profos wrote:
Hi,
many thanks for your hints. In the meantime I have tested my example, and it is now even able to find the log4j.xml resource file (there was a line of code missing, but this is not worthwhile in this context).
But two questions remain unanswered for me:
1) You wrote that it doesn't matter what is in the class path of the (called) jars' manifests. But the class loader still has to find the jars for the called classes, since these jars are not contained in the main.jar's class path. This means that obviously there is an official class path (as returned by the System.getProperty method), and another class path or rather a stack of class paths used to find classes... ??Yes, it was my assumption that it doesn't matter, but I tried something similar to what you posted and I was wrong. It appears that any jar file that gets loaded and has a Class-Path in the manifest adds to the overall classpath of the application. In other words, for java -jar, the classpath is the main jar file plus all of the Class-Path entries in all of the manifests of the dependent jars.
2) My example works well when I start it using java -jar ... But it doesn't work at all when I'm starting it in my IDE (Eclipse b.t.w.) even if I put the log4j.xml file in the directory where Main.class resides. Despite the fact that this location is the very first entry of the class path (and Log4J says that you have to put the config file in a location that is on the class path)! Are there " a first class" class path and a "second class" class path ;-)) ?
Do you have any suggestions of where to look for solutions? Apparently the ClassLoader interface doesn't provide any information about its real class path being used...?
Sorry, I can't help with IDE. It isn't clear to me whether you have a problem you need to solve or if you are trying to understand how things work. If you have a specific problem to solve, it might be a good idea to post what that problem is - there might be someone who has a solution.
What I mean is, there is an implication that you have some problem and you think that you need the running Classpath in order to solve that problem. There might be a solution other than using the Classpath.
Edited by: atmguy on Mar 21, 2008 2:22 PM

AIX 5.2 resources adaptor

How to create AIX 5.2 resource adapter. client are using some command to create and update user on the AIX Unix server.
this need to automated threw sun idm .
Do I need to write the resource action script after the AIX resource adaptor configuration done. and call this script into work flow.
please guide....
Please provide the steps for doing the user provisioning and deprovisioning on the AIX Unix server.
thanks.

sounds as wrong forum, do not see any link with linux.
anyhow, please be more specific on what is happening/not happening?
any errors on system log?

Error in doing container managed sign on with Resource Adaptor

Hi,
I have developed a Resource Adaptor. I have written a jsp file using which I want to do container managed sign on. I have followed all the steps given on bea site.
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secmanage/credential_maps.html#1100282
I have created a user in default security realm. After that I deployed my Resource Adaptor file. I defined the credential mapping for this RA with user name defined in realm & EIS user name & password. I have not defined any security role & policy for this RA.
When I deploy my web application which consist of single jsp & web.xml , I get the following error.
<Sep 10, 02004 12:43.29.890 PM> : ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' : FN_IS_SpiManagedConnectionFactory: createManagedConnection: Entered into the method.
<Sep 10, 02004 12:43.29.906 PM> : ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' : javax.resource.ResourceException: : Invalid arguments passed .
<Sep 10, 02004 12:43.29.921 PM> : ExecuteThread: '13' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' : javax.resource.ResourceException: : Invalid arguments passed .
This simply means that my Subject & ConnectionRequestInfo are null in createManagedConnectionFactory.
When i define a security role & policy for my RA, I get the following error.
<Sep 10, 2004 4:58:29 PM GMT+05:30> <Warning> <Connector> <BEA-190064> <Access has been denied to ISRA_ISCF - Application: while reserving a connection.>
<Sep 10, 02004 4:58.29.428 PM> : ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default' : javax.resource.spi.Applica
ionServerInternalException: Access to resource adapterISRA_ISCFhas been denied.
ResourceException ecnountered
javax.resource.spi.ApplicationServerInternalException: Access to resource adapterISRA_ISCFhas been denied.
at weblogic.connector.common.internal.ConnectionPoolManager.getConnection(ConnectionPoolManager.java:654)
at weblogic.connector.common.internal.ConnectionManagerImpl.allocateConnection(ConnectionManagerImpl.java:106)
at com.filenet.is.ra.cci.FN_IS_CciConnectionFactory.getConnection(Unknown Source)
here is my jsp code.
try
               ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = null;
               Connection connection = null;
               //Get the InitialContextFactory
               Context context = new InitialContext();
               //Perform JNDI Lookup
               connectionFactory =(ConnectionFactory)context.lookup ("ISCF");
               try
                    //ConnectionSpec connectionSpec = new FN_IS_CciConnectionSpec("SysAdmin", "camelot");
                    //connection = connectionFactory.getConnection(connectionSpec);
                    connection = connectionFactory.getConnection();
                    System.out.println("getConnection successful");
               catch(ResourceException re)
                    System.out.println("ResourceException ecnountered");
                    re.printStackTrace();
               catch(Exception re)
                    System.out.println("Exception ecnountered");
                    re.printStackTrace();
               System.out.println("connection created");
               FN_IS_CciInteractionSpec interactionSpec = new FN_IS_CciInteractionSpec();
               interactionSpec.setFunctionName("GetWorkspaces");
               RecordFactory recordFactory = connectionFactory.getRecordFactory();
               MappedRecord mappedRecord = recordFactory.createMappedRecord("blank");
               Interaction interaction = connection.createInteraction();
               //Execute the interaction
               IndexedRecord indexedRecord = (IndexedRecord)interaction.execute(interactionSpec, mappedRecord);
               ListIterator list = indexedRecord.listIterator();
               while (list.hasNext())
                    System.out.println((String)list.next() + "<br>");
               System.out.println("Done<br>");
          catch (Exception e)
               e.printStackTrace();
               System.out.println(" Message = " + e.getMessage());
               System.out.println(" toString = " + e.toString());
here iam doing lookup of the connection factory & calling getConnection() method & simply executing an interaction.
Can anyone help me what could be the possible cause of the problem.

You might want to post this query to one of the websphere forums.
- Binod.

Loading IBM Resource adaptor mqjbnd.so in weblogic 11

Hi,
We are trying to use IBM resource adaptor with weblogic 11 for MQ integration. The environment is 64 bit. In AIX environment, an error is occurring that mqjbnd native library not found. mqjbnd is a .so file extension. Is there any specific way to load .so file in weblogic? we have tried giving the path in weblogic startup script and also putting it in domain lib folder. but it is not working. Please suggest how this .so file can be loaded in weblogic. Thanks.

they use classloaders. it's too large a subject to
really get into here, but google "java classloaders"
for more info. a very handy technique to knowA quick google search didnot give any satisfactory results. Still trying..
Are you saying classes can be loaded remotely too?
Bcos, in the case mentioned above, "com.ibm.mq" classes need not exist anywhere on the local machine
Message was edited by:
raeeskader

Test connection failed for resource(s): AD: == No route to host\n

Hi, First of all I would like to tell you that the application was running fine few days back, this issue has come suddenly.
I am getting following error while doing connection test for AD with SUN IDM:
Test connection failed for resource(s): AD: ==> No route to host\n
and when I try to open the detail for windows active directory arrow mark from the resource tab, Its giving me below error:
Error iterating over objects ==> com.waveset.util.WavesetException: ==>java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
I tried to google on this but all are pointing to some network/firewall problem.
Can anybody suggest me the correction ways to resolve this problem. Any idea how I can proceed further.
Thanks,
Jimmy

First of all, I dont know if you even done the proper fault elimination
No route to host is indicative of a network problem that could be based on several different faults.
Simplest way to check, log in to the system running your IdM.
first check if your nameservice is working
nslookup <your fully qualified hostname for the AD gateway>
idmmgr@unix103a:$ nslookup idm-gw.company.com
Server:         139.188.2.1
Address:        139.188.2.1#53
idm-gw.company.com canonical name = win050a.company.com.
Name:   win050a.company.com
Address: 171.39.88.145if you get the right response there
try pinging the returned address
idmmgr@unix103a:$ ping 171.39.88.145
171.39.88.145 is aliveIf you have a routing problem it will probably show above...
if the route to the gateway works, it might be the gateway that cant talk to the AD
Just follow the track manually and if it stops working from one point, go past that point (if you can) and see if it works beyond it.
Either way, whatever resource is pointed out in the connectinfo in the pertinent adaptor or connector should work from the prompt of the system running it, if not, then you can start unraveling it from there.

Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL

Dear All,
Posting limit restriction ( UpTO 10000) for T Code FB60 - for specific GL
Is it Possibal ?
Any other way to stop Posting Amt more than Rs 10000 ( Ten Thousand)
In specific T Code FB60
Required urgent Help,
Your early reply / solution is expected
Regards,
S Kulkarni

Hi,
Just go to OB28, define a validation (if you do not use one already), define one step, define the prerequisites on BSEG level of the account and define the check.
For example, you can use the validation for the following situation: You want to make sure that postings to the expense account "Telephone costs" can only be posted to the services cost center "Telephone". You can carry out the checks needed for this by using the validation.
Activities
If you want to define new validations, go through the following activities:
1. Place the cursor on a line in which company code and callup point are entered (you can enter company code and validation callup point via Edit -> New entries).
2. Afterwards select Environment -> Validation. You reach the first screen for maintaining a validation.
3. Select Validation -> Create. Enter the required name. After pressing ENTER, you come to an overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation.
4. Select Insert entry. On the next screen you can describe a new validation activity. You describe the check requirements and the actual check for this. The syntax to be used for this is described in the online help (F1 help) for the input fields for Requirements and Check. You can also define a message (warning or error message) which is sent if the check is not successful.
If you want to change validations which already exist, proceed as follows:
1. Place the cursor on an already existing entry and select Goto -> Validation.
2. On the next screen select Validation -> Display or Validation -> Change. After pressing ENTER, you get to the overview screen of the validation activities belonging to the validation. If you select Insert entry, you can carry out changes if necessary.
Regards,
Eli

Database error"ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource"

Hi All,
I got dump as
Database error text........: "ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for
resource"
Internal call code.........: "[RSQL/RDUP/NRIV ]"
Please check the entries in the system log (Transaction SM21).
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
in
procedure "READ_NRIV" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Can u ppl tell me how to get correct this?
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Jul 20, 2009 11:01 AM

Hi Bala,
Same type of dump we got when we trigger the DTP which in process chain to load data from DSO to Info cube. And the load had processed with 225 data package and at 164th data package we got this error and except 164th data package all data package processed successfully
And the request was red. So we had done processed manually by clicking the icon. So all its been green and successfully loaded.
So when you do process manual the particular data package which got failed will be process successfully

ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource CLOSE cursor

Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
Raf

Raf Serrano wrote:
Hi,
I am a new member of this forum. I am working with a problem we got a few weeks ago. It is from a Pro C batch executable running on 10 threads dealing with >800 data accessed from multiple tables. The error as reported came from a package.function call.
This is the error I encountered:
process_item~G****, D***~-60~ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource~PACKAGE ERROR = CLOSE cursor C_***** in package R***.I*** 7641
The cursor is a simple SELECT cursor without Table or Record locking.
My questions are:
*Upon the occurrence of this error, is the execution already at the CLOSE cursor line or did the error occurred between the OPEN cursor and the CLOSE cursor? There are several lines of code in between OPEN and CLOSE:
- one that calls for a package.function that simply stores parameter values to a variable
- another one which fetches the cursor. The group that holds the cursor values is only used by a single function in the package
*Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor to cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
*From what I know, Oracle deals with deadlocks by aborting the deadlocking process while others continue, but this deadlock caused our program to hang. How is this possible? Could the root cause of the deadlock be from our threading program? This is a rare occurrence and happened only twice this year.
Thanks,
RafSELECT (without FOR UPDATE) statements are never involved in ORA-00060.
only DML statements throw ORA-00060 error

Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....

Hi all,
i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
some times it executes and gives result..
but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
Thanks in advance
Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
Error from alert log:
Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
System name:    Linux
Node name:      bdrdb.cteplindia.com
Release:        2.6.18-308.el5PAE
Version:        #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
Machine:        i686
Instance name: bdrdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 92
Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
Rows waited on:
Session 423: no row
Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
(dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Session 128:
sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
    flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
    flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
    image: [email protected]
client details:
    O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
    machine: masked program: Toad.exe
    application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
    application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
       B_USER_INFO,
       J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
       L_TEST_STATUS,
       L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
       j_op_test_anml
WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
       AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
       AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
       AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
       AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
----- Error Stack Dump -----
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
----- SQL Statement (None) -----
Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling              call     entry                argument values in hex
location             type     point                (? means dubious value)
More......
Query:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
       B_USER_INFO,
       J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
       L_TEST_STATUS,
       L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
       j_op_test_anml
WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
       AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
       AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
       AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
       AND (   (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                            AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
            OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                              AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
            OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                            AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
            OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                            AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
Query Exp plan:
Plan hash value: 3398228788
| Id | Operation                                          | Name                | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                                   |                     | 1501 |   102K| 1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                                       |                     | 1501 |   102K| 1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
|   2 |   CONCATENATION                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   3 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   4 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ30005            |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 5 |      HASH JOIN                                     |                     |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
|   6 |       PX RECEIVE                                   |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |        PX SEND HASH                                | :TQ30004            |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 8 |         HASH JOIN                                  |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
| 10 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ30003            |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,03 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 11 |            HASH JOIN                               |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 12 |             BUFFER SORT                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
| 13 |              PX RECEIVE                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 14 |               PX SEND BROADCAST                    | :TQ30000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 15 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 16 |                 NESTED LOOPS                       |                     |   485 | 20855 |   781   (0)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 17 |                  TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML      |   485 | 10185 |   296   (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
|* 18 |                   INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | IDX$$_2D190001      |   485 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 19 |                  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                 | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 20 |                 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 21 |             PX BLOCK ITERATOR                      |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
|* 22 |              TABLE ACCESS FULL                     | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 23 |          BUFFER SORT                               |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWC |            |
| 24 |           PX RECEIVE                               |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
| 25 |            PX SEND HASH                            | :TQ30001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 27 |       BUFFER SORT                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWC |            |
| 28 |        PX RECEIVE                                  |                     |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
| 29 |         PX SEND HASH                               | :TQ30002            |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 30 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL                         | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 31 |    NESTED LOOPS                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 32 |     NESTED LOOPS                                   |                     |     3 |   210 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 33 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |     3 |   195 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 34 |       HASH JOIN                                    |                     |     2 |   114 |   325   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 35 |        NESTED LOOPS                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 36 |         NESTED LOOPS                               |                     |     6 |   258 |   322   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 37 |          PARTITION RANGE SINGLE                    |                     |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 38 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL                        | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 39 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                         | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 40 |         TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID         | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
|* 41 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL                           | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 42 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   |     1 |     8 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 43 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                            | FI_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 44 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                             | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 45 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                    | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 46 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 47 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ20003            |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 48 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 49 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 | 2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 50 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    33 | 2145 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 51 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 52 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ20002            |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,02 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 53 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 54 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
| 55 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 56 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ20000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 57 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 58 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 | 2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 59 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 60 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 61 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 62 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 63 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
|* 64 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 65 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWC |            |
| 66 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 67 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ20001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 68 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 69 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 70 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 71 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 72 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ10003            |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 73 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 74 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 | 2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 75 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    34 | 2210 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 76 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 77 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ10002            |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,02 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 78 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 79 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
| 80 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 81 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ10000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 82 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 83 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 | 2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 84 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 85 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 86 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 87 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 88 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
|* 89 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 90 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWC |            |
| 91 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 92 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ10001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 93 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 94 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 95 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
   8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
              (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)

Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
A couple of generic notes:
if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

I want to reset my ipod touch 4th gen but i have forgotten the restrictions passcode and for some reason its not working on my laptop on itunes and the restore thing wont work! any help?

I want to reset my ipod touch 4th gen but i have forgotten the restrictions passcode and for some reason its not working on my laptop on itunes and the restore thing wont work! any help?

Make sure you have the Current Version of iTunes Installed on your computer
iTunes free download from www.itunes.com/download
Then See Here > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808
You may need to try this More than Once... Be sure to Follow ALL the Steps...
Take your time... Pay particular attention to Steps 3 and 4.
After you have Recovered your Device...Re-Sync your Content
Note:
To remove a forgotten Restrictions passcode you will need to Restore the Device as New...
OR... From a Backup created Before the Restrictions Code was set....

How to restrict the GR for Production Order when Goods Issue is not done

Hi Gurus
How to restrict the GR for Production Order when all the required components for production order are not issued with all required quantity. Even for partial issue system should not allow GR with 101. The user status with RMWA, RMWF & CGFB is not working.
Pls suggest best solution.
Abhijit.

Hi,
You can club together the GI nad GR at the time of confirmation..
I.e Backflush for the components and auto GR for the Product.
So that you can stream line the Process.
The best Option would be to use the User Exit:
Enhancement - MBCF0002
Functional Module - EXIT_SAPMM07M_001
Include - ZXMBCU02
Refer below link for further details..
How to stop the goods receipt before issueing the goods for production orde
Regards,
Siva

How to Restrict printing the document using IRM for a Single Document?Allow printing for some documents and restrict the printing for particular documents in same document library?

Can we able to Configure the IRM in Document Level in SharePoint Document libraries?
The document library contains multiple document sets , Can we restrict the printing according to document sets? Allow printing for some documents and restrict the printing for particular documents in same document library
Is this possible?Please suggest.

Yes, that can be done. But note that all administrators will have the same right to print, so you need to make sure the users are not administrators. You can include a macro to disable printing, but if the users disable macro, they can print the documents.
Hence, there is no foolproof way to prevent printing documents. If you still need a foolproof security, PDF format provides password based security (viewing doesn't require a password) that can be implemented to prevent the document from printing,
which doesn't require any special scripts and is tough.
You can have a look at the following links:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ms458245(v=office.14).aspx
http://msgroups.net/microsoft.public.word.docmanagement/prevent-printing-of-docum/91353
http://www.go4sharepoint.com/Forum/prevent-printing-saving-documents-10150.aspx
The following link explains about the security features in PDF. This is for information purpose only and not for promotion of any products:
http://www.pdflib.com/knowledge-base/pdf-security/
Balaji Kundalam

Restricting Delegate Classloading for Resource Adaptor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for