Restricting single PO with multiple plant

Experts,
Pl help me in restricting user from creating single PO with multiple plant. Is there any config available???
I dnt want to go for any ABAP development.
Thanks in Advance,
Parag Mahajan

Dear Parag,
Querry : Restricting a single P.O. with multiple plants:
If you want to restrict a single Purchase order with multiple plants the reason may be that;
Suppose your ordering material A for which you have three vendors in you SAP. But you are requiring this material in all your plants say example three plants.
You can create Purchase order for same with vendor but due the huge requirement your vendor get overloaded.And your other capable vendors are not used at all.
You can try out with quota arrangement for all vendors with which the quantity will be allocated to all the vendors depending on the quota rating.
Also you can define lot sizing procedure for a your vendor in customizing and can avoid creating Purcahse order with multiple plants.
Thanks ,
Tushar Patankar

Similar Messages

Restrict PO creation for multiple plants for same company code

Hi Gurus,
We want to restrict PO creation for multiple plants in the same company code. Based on Standard SAP settings for Purchasing organization assignment with multiple Plant and multiple Plant assignment with single company code, this is happening. Is there a way that we can restrict by doing some customization change.
Any thoughts or ideas will be highly appreciating.
Thanks and Best regards,
Karun Kumar

Hi,
Said functionality is not available in SAP standard.
To avoid the same ,i can suggest implement release strategy for PO,and then higher authority / commercial team can check created PO,if multiple plants available in single po then they have the option of rejection for the same.
Or else check BADI-ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST,take the help from abapor and apply the restriction to select multiple plant in PO.
Hope this will resolve your query,
Thanks & Regards,
Sandesh Sawant

Sharing iTunes on a single computer with multiple users

Greetings,
I have been troubleshooting a problem sharing iTunes on a single computer with multiple users that cropped up a few weeks ago and have not had very good luck.
Several months ago I successfully set up my wife’s G4 Laptop (PowerPC processor) so that we could share iTunes on that computer. I had just gotten her an “My Book” external hard drive (Western Digital). The iTunes Library will go on this new unit because the internal drive was running out of room. I successfully set the privileges, moved the entire library onto a “Share” directory and everything worked fine.
In this way, when I got a new CD I could add it to iTunes (under my login, administrator privileges) and she could access it (under her login) to listen to while working on the computer or using her iPod. This arrangement went well for quite awhile.
About a month and a half ago, when I tried to launch iTunes from my login I received this message:
“The iTunes Library file is locked, on a locked disk, or you do not have write permission for this file.”
I think the permissions must have changed when there was an update because my wife is pretty careful about what she does on her computer. Updates were the only thing I could think of that had changed since I had set her computer up. I also noticed that some of the iTunes defaults were different from the last time I had used it to add a CD.
So, I did some reading and went back through the motions of trying to set it up again. I re-formatted the My Book hard drive to Mac OS Extended (Journaled) added the files back to the external, reset permissions on the external hard drive. (Owners: System, Access: read and write - Group: wheel, Access: read and write – Others: read and write).
When I now launch iTunes under my login I get this message:
“The operation cannot be completed because you do not have sufficient privileges for some of the items.”
What gives? I am the original owner and have always had top-level privileges.
Can someone point me to any articles or clues as to how I need to set-up iTunes on a single computer to be shared by more than one user? Also, I am considering upgrading to the newer system in a few weeks, so if a solution for OS X 10.5 is available, that would work too.
Tim

Was your wife logged into the libray at the time you tried to log in? I have had a similar problem and it was because another user was logged into the library when I attempted to. I got the permission denied banner.

HT2688 Working on a single computer with multiple users, I have set things up to allow each user to view and listen to the others' music libraries under the "Shared Library" function. Can you then connect an iPod touch and copy music from a shared librar

Working on a single computer with multiple users, I have set things up to allow each user to view and listen to the others' music libraries under the "Shared Library" function. Can you then connect an iPod touch and copy music from a shared library?

Was your wife logged into the libray at the time you tried to log in? I have had a similar problem and it was because another user was logged into the library when I attempted to. I got the permission denied banner.

Standard Rush Order with multiple plants

Hello gurus,
We just upgraded to 6.0 from 31I and when creating a
rush order with multiple plants the first item's delivery
does not contain a ship-to party were the second item's
delivery does. Table VBPA does not have a record for the
first delivery but the second delivery is there. This did not happen in 31I.
Please advice.
Best Regards.

hello, Ruben.
hhmmm. your table XVBPA looks like a created table that is not SAP standard. i am not an ABAP person so i could not pretend to give you good advice, but i (my speculation only) suspect that there was a user exit or an ABAP program that made the system do the postings to this table instead of the standard VBPA.
i further speculate that during the upgrades, some of the enhancements may have been lost or diverted. (to prevent this, you usually use the 'Z' naming convention, which is to have this letter as the start of any name for an enhancement or definition outside of SAP standard)
your best bet is to try getting an ABAP consultant (or are you one already?) to help you look at this.
regards!

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions?

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions? Is advisable to have separate tables than having a single big table with partitions? Can we expect same performance having single big table with partitions? What is the recommendation approach in HANA?

Suren,
first off a friendly reminder: SCN is a public forum and for you as an SAP employee there are multiple internal forums/communities/JAM groups available. You may want to consider this.
Concerning your question:
You didn't tell us what you want to do with your table or your set of tables.
As tables are not only storage units but usually bear semantics - read: if data is stored in one table it means something else than the same data in a different table - partitioned tables cannot simply be substituted by multiple tables.
Looked at it on a storage technology level, table partitions are practically the same as tables. Each partition has got its own delta store & can be loaded and displaced to/from memory independent from the others.
Generally speaking there shouldn't be too many performance differences between a partitioned table and multiple tables.
However, when dealing with partitioned tables, the additional step of determining the partition to work on is always required. If computing the result of the partitioning function takes a major share in your total runtime (which is unlikely) then partitioned tables could have a negative performance impact.
Having said this: as with all performance related questions, to get a conclusive answer you need to measure the times required for both alternatives.
- Lars

How to compare single value with multiple values

In my query I have something like this:
A.SOR_CD=B.SOR_CODE where A and B are 2 different tables. This condition is in the where clause. The column in table A has single values but some values in table B have multiple comma separated values (822, 869, 811, ..). I want to match this single
value on the left side with each of the comma separated values. Please let me know how will I be able to do it. The number of comma separated values on the right side may vary.

Hi MadRad123,
According to your description, you want to compare single value with multiple values in your query. Right?
In this scenario, the table B has comma separated values, however those comma separated values are concatenated into a string. So we can use charindex() function to return the index of the table A value. And use this index as condition in
your where clause. See the sample below:
CREATE TABLE #temp1(
ID nvarchar(50),
Name nvarchar(50))
INSERT INTO #temp1 VALUES
('1','A'),
('2','A'),
('3','A'),
('4','A'),
('5','A')
CREATE TABLE #temp2(
ID nvarchar(50),
Name nvarchar(50))
INSERT INTO #temp2 VALUES
('1','a,A'),
('2','A,B'),
('3','c'),
('4','A,C'),
('5','d')
select * from #temp1 a inner join #temp2 b on a.ID=b.ID
where CHARINDEX(a.Name,b.Name)>0
The result looks like below:
Reference:
CHARINDEX (Transact-SQL)
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Single BOM across multiple plants in sub-contracting

We have a single purchasing organisation managing sub-contracting for around 17 plants. This organisaiton purchases sub-contracted items for all the plants.
The problem we are facing is having to maintain the same BOM for all the 17 plants.
The central purchasing org is going to create the PO with multiple lines - requesting delivery from the vendor to the different plants.
How can we avoid having to create the same BOM in every plant?
Regards,
Praveen.

hi
u can avoid by choosing the recurrcive allowed for BOM can avoid it
kishore reddy

Materials with multiple plants and wm views

Hello,
we are migrating materials to an environment where we have multiple plants, sales org., warehouse numbers. When we create the WM view we set a plant and warehouse number. As WM view is not really connected to a plant (table MLGN) we have the problem that when the users wish to mantain a material WM view, they see different combinations of plants and warehouse numbers, what is not really correct, as they are in different countries.
Country 1: plant 0001, warehouse number 001
Country 2: plant 0002, warehouse number 002
Country 3: plant 0003, warehouse number 003
In country 1, with MM02, the user can open the material in plant 0001 and in any warehouse, ie. 001, 002, 003. This user should only be able to open plant 0001, warehouse nr. 001.
Is there a way in customizing, authorizations, etc. to avoid this?
Thanks for your comments.

Hi
THis can be contolled via authorisation to the users. Please check with Basis consultant.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/91/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm]
Karthik
Edited by: Karthik on Jun 29, 2011 5:59 PM

Vendor master data - Single material with multiple price

Hi Gurus,
Per our set-up, we have 1 purchasing organization to handle the central procurement function for purchases to various countries/destination. As such, whenever we seek for quotation from a single vendor, the vendor will provide their price for a single/same material, e.g. ABC, with various price by locations. for example:
1. Material: ABC
- Price: $83 (EXW)
- Price: $85 (FOB, Tianjin)
- Price: $100 (CFR Port Klang)
- Price: $120 (CFR Mumbai)
- Price: $160 (CFR Jabel Ali)
Is there a way I can use any of the vendor master records (e.g. outline agreement / info records) to capture a single material having multiple price? At the same time, this infomation is available during our PO creation (e.g. via ME57).
Thanks in advance.

Dear
For Condition Type PB00, SAP has some standard requirements in Pricing Schema.For one material different location one requirement is there.But as per your requirements you need to put logic through ABAP and it will definetely work.The exact requiremnt i'm not remembering.
Just go through all the requiremnt and respect to PB00, put the requiremnt and put the logic.
Revert me for the result.
Thanks & Regards
PKB

Single report with multiple queries OR multiple reports with single query

Hello Experts,
I have a confusion regarding Live Office connection for many days. I asked many people but did not get a concrete answer. I am re-posting this question here and expecting an answer this time.
The product versions that I am using are as follows:
FrontEnd:
BOE XI 3.1 SP4 FP 4.1
Xcelsius Enterprise 2008 SP4
Backend:
SAP BW 7.0 EHP1
I have created a dashboard which is getting data from a webi report using LO connections.
The webi report has five report parts which are populated by five different queries.
Now my question is, when the five LO connections are refreshed, is the webi report refreshed five times or just once?
If the report is refreshed five times, then I guess it is better to have five different webi reports containing single report part, because in that way we can prevent same query being executed multiple times.
SO what is the best practice- to have a single report having multiple queries - OR - to create multiple webi reports with single query?
Thanks and Regards,
PASG

HI
I think Best Practice is Multiple reports with single query
Any way If LO connections refresh 5 time the query will refresh 5 timesRegards
Venkat

ME52N-Create PR with Multiple plants..

Hi,
Version of our SAP System is 4.6C..
In ME52N transaction there is a tab called 'Release Strategy'...
In this we have to enter materials belonging to same plant..
for ex : if item1 is of plant 1011 then plant of item2 should also be 1011
but according to our requirement it can be 1014 also..that is multiple plants..
Is it possible to fulfill this requirement..if so any suggestion on how to proceed..
Any help will be appreciated..
Thanks & Regards
Swathi

Hi
THis can be contolled via authorisation to the users. Please check with Basis consultant.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/91/1a39516e36d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm]
Karthik
Edited by: Karthik on Jun 29, 2011 5:59 PM

How can I compare single value with multiple value...

Hello,
I want to compare one value with multiple values, how can it possible ?
Here in attachment I tried to design same logic but I got problem that when I entered value in y that is compared with only minimum value of x, I don't want that I want to compare y value with all the x value and then if y is less then x while loop should be stop.
I want to do so because in my program some time I didn't get result what I want, for example x values is 4,5,6,7,8 and y value is suppose 6 then while loop should be stop but here it consider only minimum number and its 4 here so while loop is not stop even y is less then 7 and 8. So I want to compare y value with all the entered values of x and if y is less then any of x values then while loop should be stop and led should be ON.
Please guide me how can I do so.....
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
COMPARISON.vi ‏8 KB

AnkitRamani wrote:
Thank you very mach for your help..
may be i have solved this ....i have made one change in my vi that instead of min. i select max and max. value is compare with the value of y and then if y is less then the max. while loop will be stop other wise its run continuously.
this is working fine...
any ways thanks again for your help and time...
I have to agree with Lewis - his way is more efficient.
Bill
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.

Dual uplinks with single 5400 and single 6509 (with multiple interface cards)

I have a single 5400 with two gige ports and a single 6509 with dual gige line cards.
What would be the best method for running them with dual connections in case an interface or line card goes bad?
Thanks in advance.

Thank you for the reply Joseph. I swear I've ran SLA on 6500's before. This box is running IOS 12.2 so maybe that's the culprit.
I found a simple way to configure both devices redundantly using administrative distanced routes pointing through a specified interface. On the 6509, the routes point to a loopback address on the 5400, on the 5400 it's configured as default routes. Like this document explains:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/27082-ip-static-routes.html
Seems to work like a champ.

MTO Discrete Manufacturing with multiple plants and sub-contracting

Dear PP Gurus,
I am facing a problem, pl. help me out.
My Scenario is as follows:
I am having 4 plants with Make-To-Order Discrete Manufacturing scenarieo .
Suppose to manufacture a particular Product , there are 10 operations.The first 4 operations are carried out in Plant A, 5th and 6th carried out in Plant B, Operations 7 is Sub-contracted to a Vendor. After the job-work from Vendor, the job returns back to Plant A and the remaining operations are carried out in Plant A.
The whole scenario has to be mapped into SAP. Please guide me from the very beginning( Masterdata maintenance). Also, what shud be the MRP( Single-item multilevel or anything else)
Your help is highly required by me.
Thanks in advance,
Soumyendu

Hi Sadhukhan,
For external processing in different company code, u need to specify PP02 in the routing for external vendor. In PP02 control key indicator must be set in external opn. Before that create purchase info record. Enter subcontract info record in routing. After running MRP , convert the PR to PO. Send the material by MB1B by 541 mvt. Receive the material by MIGO by 101 mvt.
Reward if useful.
Keerthi

Restricting single PO with multiple plant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for