Restricting the visibility of Dataview

Hi All,
Could anyone assist me in restricting the visibility of dataview for a specific planner in the SDP94 screen.
The problem is when a planner opens his planning book he is able to see all the data views whereas he has authorization for only one data view.
How do i ensure that he is able to view only his dataview.
I have tried the assign planners to planing book option but i cannot assign more than one.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Raj

Using the authorization object C_APO_PB, i'm able to restrict the view only for planning books but not the dataviews. i have used the following auth objects:
C_APO_PB : SDP planning books
ACTVT Activity (01, 02, 03, 06, 16)
APO_PLBK2 Planning book
APO_DVIEW Data view
In our scenario, we have 3 planning books and each planning book has 20 datviews and i have assigned a single dataview from each planning book for a specific user using the above authorization objects. Even after maintaining the authorization for only one dataview for a particular user, i'm able to see all the dataviews in the SDP94 screen. How can I restrict the visibility of dataviews.
Regards,
Raj

Similar Messages

Restrict the visibility of a field in the table

There is a field in master database (pa0002) , i dont know from how many ways the field value can be seen like transaction, table view or abap query, but the requirement is the restrict the visibility of the value of the field to specific user , so please suggest me any peoper solution.
Screen field: Q0002-BSNCD / Table field: PA0002-PERID
Only authorized users are be able to see the BSN number.
Other users should not have access to the BSN number in any way. I.e., access to the BSN number via the IT0002 screen, queries, table view or other ways should be prohibited when not authorized.

Hi,
Can you try creating an authorisation object and including an authority check in the PBO.
Regards,
Sonal

We have to restrict the visibility of Questions based upon technical and co

We have to restrict the visibility of Questions based upon technical and commercial. For example if there are two section commercial and technical, technical team should not be able to see commercial questions and vice-versa

Hi
I could suggest an alternative approach. You take a call whether it suits your business process
Create a project for the event. Within project you can create two seperate Rfx one with technical team as collaborator and the other with Commercial team. Two Rfx would be evaluated and awarded seperately by respective team. You can take help of your technical expert to create custom report for overall evaluation
Regards
Mudit Saini

Restricting the Visibility of FireFighter Roles to selcted users

Dear Experts,
Is there any way to restrict the visibiilty of FireFigher roles in GRC CUP to only few authorized users. we have a requirement where a group of authorized users should be able to check out fire fighter roles on their own and these roles should be provisioned automatically to these users and then de-provision those roels after some time. These rolese should not be visible to the rest of the users.
Any throughts on this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Kumar

Kumar,
There is no straightforward or right way to do this as this feature is not available in CUP.
You can associate those users with a functional area and restrict the role selection by functional area. Also, associate the roles with the same functional area. Again, this is not going to force users unless you bring functional area from the data source like LDAP and keep the field non-editable.
Regards,
Alpesh

Restrict the Partner functions visible in the Partners tab of One Order obj

Hi Gurus,
We are implementing Opportunity Management
We want to restrict the Partner functions visible in the picklist in the partners tab
can anyone suggest how we can achieve this
Regards,
Vish

Vish,
If you would have searched on "restrict partner list" in this forum, you would have found your answer as the first search result. Please in the future do a search before posting here and read the rules of engagement.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement
The thread that answers your question is located here:
Hide List Elements for example Partner Functions
I'm know locking this thread due to this being a duplicate question.
Thank you,
Stephen
Edited by: Stephen Johannes on Apr 27, 2009 8:45 AM

Restrict the number of visible values in drop down by key?

Hello,
Is it possible to restrict the max. number of entries displayed in a drop down by key element? By default i get 10 entries which i would like to limit to 5. Thanks.
Regards,
Vasu

Hi,
If you have a set of default values (which come from the domain), you can restrict them to the specific values which you need to display. In the INIT method of the view in which this UI element is present, you will have to write code to delete the entries which you do not wish to show in the drop down by key element.
Have a look at this code snippet:
data:     node_info type ref to if_wd_context_node_info,
            elem_attr type wdr_context_attribute_info.
node_info = wd_context->get_node_info( ).
node_info = node_info->get_child_node( 'CHILD_NODE' ).
data:    lt_valueset type wdr_context_attr_value_list,
        l_value type wdr_context_attr_value.
call method node_info->get_attribute
    exporting
      name           = 'ATTR1'
    receiving
      attribute_info = elem_attr.
lt_valueset = elem_attr-value_set.
delete lt_valueset where value = 'VALUE1'.
node_info->set_attribute_value_set(
            name = 'ATTR1'
            value_set = lt_valueset ).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Wenonah

How to restrict the decimal entry on dynamic table in adf 11 .6

Hi All,
JDev version 11.6
I have a usecase based on dynamic VO. How to restrict the decimal numbers on table columns . When user enter the decimal number .I have to show error message.
In order to achieve above requirement .I have added value change listener on table column .its not working as expected
<af:table rows="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.rangeSize}"
                  fetchSize="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.rangeSize}"
                  emptyText="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.viewable ? 'No data to display.' : 'Access Denied.'}"
                  var="row" rowBandingInterval="0"
                  value="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel}"
                  selectedRowKeys="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel.selectedRow}"
                  selectionListener="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.collectionModel.makeCurrent}"
                  rowSelection="single" id="t1"
                  styleClass="AFStretchWidth" autoHeightRows="-1"
                  columnStretching="last" contentDelivery="immediate" >
          <af:forEach items="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.attributeDefs}"
                      var="def">
            <af:column headerText="#{bindings.EmployeeDynamicVO.labels[def.name]}"
                       sortProperty="#{def.name}" id="c1">
              <af:inputText value="#{row[def.name]}" id="ot1"
                            valueChangeListener="#{backingBeanScope.EmployeeBean.validateINputs}"
                            autoSubmit="true">
                </af:inputText>
              <af:outputText value="#{row[def.name]}" id="ot6"
                             visible="#{def.name eq 'Dummy'}"/>
            </af:column>
          </af:forEach>
        </af:table>
So appriciate if any alternatives on above usecase. Thanks in advance

HI
Expected :as soon as user enter the decimal values in table column , it should throw the error message in new small new window
Getting the value change listener and validating , but its working only tab out (Because VO is dynamic )
please suggest us any reg expression and Validators to achieve the above scenario ?

How to restrict the modification of a process form field.

Hi,
Is there a way out to restrict the modification of a process form field.
I have a process form field loginid which can not be updated in a target. I want to achieve the same in OIM. I have not created any update task for the field but if the user changes the loginid field then it is getting saved in the OIM database and hence any operation thereafter is falling.
Thanks

Hi Kevin.
I really appreciate your help.
But I tested your configuration in our environment and it doesn't work. The same error (The Resource has not been configured properly) is displayed when I try a provisioning for that resource. Anyway, we could not use this configuration here, because end-users shall have the option to change some values in their process form.
I don't know why, but seems that when I define any field as Display-Only, the prepopulate adapter runs in a post-insert schedule and a error is given cause it try to fulfill a display-only field, which is not allowed.
I try an alternative configuration, which works properly:
- keep the field User ID as Text Field.
- use the prepopulate adapter to populate this field with the User Login (previously defined in the User Definition form)
- delete the property "required = true" to this field
- set property "visible = false" to this field
In this way, the end-users can modify the other fields, except User ID. Otherwise, they never will can see their own User IDs while making a request. For new users it will not be a problem because their User Login (on User Definition) and User ID (on Process Form) will be exactly the same, but for users that already exists in the target system, this values will be different which can originate small issues.
Until achieve an understanding about why a display-only field can not be filled by an pre-populate adapter, I will use this setting above.
Regards.

How to limit the visibility of records of product?

Hello,
I would like to restrict access to a range of products. Specifically, the company has different departments (different OD CRM users), and depending on the department to which it belongs is requested or not the visibility of the products.
I tested with groups shared computer, books, and permission level roles, but the Product entity does not have any of these options ...
In CRM On Demand Administration forum suggest me the following:
"if you clicked on a weblink in the opportunity object which could bring up a new window via a custom web service program and in the new window you could do a search of products. The web service program could determine the user and department and control which products are available."
I have the following doubts:
1) How can I call a WS via a pop window?
2) In a WS I can search products, but how can I control the access/visibility of products over CRM OD with the custom WS program? Because in the Product WS I think the only operations allowed are: Execute, Insert, Update and Delete records.
Thank you and regards.

Hi,
If you just wanted to restrict the search resuilt when you select product on opportunity page, I dont think you have to use web services, my recommendation is using report with Javascripts;
You can do a report with product name, department, and other fields you need. then you put javascripts in the report with Static Text function, this java script is to simulate a cascading picklist, you first select department, then you select prodcut, the listed products will be only within this department. and another function of this java scripts is after you select the product, the product will be auto-fill into product field on your opportunity or product revenue page.
you also need a weblink to show this report on your opportunity or product revenue page, so that you can do the search/product select.
you could also put a filter in the report, eg, the department which the current login use belongs to, then when the use select the product from the weblink, it will be only the products they shoud see.
I havn't done this on product object, but I did this rescrition on other objects, it works. if you need some sample code of javascript, let me know I will send to you.
Hope it is helpful.

Restrict the users to use the field Unplanned delivery cost at MIRO

Dear Friends,
I want to restrict some users to use the unplanned delivery cost at MIRO. It should be displayed as visible to enter for some users and it should be displayed in grey mode not to enter anything for some users. I am asking this to restrict some misutilisation of this field by some users. Can I restrict through profiles?
Simply, I want to restrict the users to use the field Unplanned delivery cost at MIRO through Profiles of them. Pls help me,, it is impacting our business.
Regards,
Venkata Reddy.Mudda

Hi,
Check the customization for unplanned cost:
SPRO -- Materials Management -- Invoice Verification -- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Incoming Invoice -- Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
Best Regards
Anamika

What are the command line options to start firefox to start in a kiosk mode which restricts the options that a user can select

I would like to use Firefox as my browser but want to restrict the configuration options that a user can do. Is there a command line option to start in a kiosk more in which no toolbars are visible including min/maximise buttons so that only the rendered webpage is visible? I am interested for both Windows and Linux environments.

There is a /wait option for the Windows "start" command to wait for the program to get finished.
*http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb491005.aspx
<pre><nowiki>/wait : Starts an application and waits for it to end. </nowiki></pre>

In Free goods how to restrict the quantity to not to alter.

Dear All,
I have maintain condition record for free goods in VBN1.EX.102.While creating sales order for 20 quantities system populates 204.But if am changing this as 152 or 205,system is allowing to do.Same is the case at delivery.How can we restrict the system to not to allow the changes in sales order in case of free goods .Please guide me.
Regards,
Deepti

Hi
KIndly check the below user exit and make the free goods item as in display mode
MV45AFZZ 'USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION'
to change the SCREEN-INPUT = 0 to make it display for free goods item category Tann
By doing above if any one changes main item system will accordingly change the free goods item also
Regards
Damu.

Restrict the list of values retrieved by a model driven LOV

hi all
i'm try to restrict the list of values retrieved by a model driven LOV just like the article in this link
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/fnimphius/restrictlovlist/restrictlov.html
and i'm using the jdev11.2 but i always get this error
java.sql.SQLException: parameter IN or OUT is missing at index 1
my code is :
public void SetSchoolLovVar(LaunchPopupEvent launchPopupEvent)
String var_val=getOt7().getValue().toString();
System.out.println("++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++"+var_val);
BindingContext bctx = BindingContext.getCurrent();
BindingContainer bindings = bctx.getCurrentBindingsEntry();
FacesCtrlLOVBinding lov = (FacesCtrlLOVBinding)bindings.get("DeptCode");
System.out.print("LOVE "+lov);
System.out.println("+_+_+_+_+__+_+_+__+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_________+++++_+_+_"+lov.getName());
lov.getListIterBinding().getViewObject().setNamedWhereClauseParam("Rejon_For_Prj_Dept",var_val);
Rejon_For_Prj_Dept is the bind variable of the Lov Query.
any good idea

Hi,
The error might be due to making the bind variable as required but not using it in the vo query. Edit the bind variable and make it as optional by unchecking the required checkbox.
Sireesha

How to Restrict the users from changing the Default variant of report.

Hello everybody,
The requirement is to restrict the users to save and overwrite the default layout variant (Layout for higher managenet)set for the report, but at the same time they should be able to change and save the other layouts for which they are having access.
I have written the logic in the program which is working fine for all the scenario when we execute the report. But the logic doesnt work if the user is selecting the layout on the output screen of the report.
for e.g if the user runs the report using the layout varaint for which he is having the authorization then he gets the all 4 options so he then he can select the layout for which he is not authorized and he can overwrite.
i have debugged and check as i have found that after the report output is shown all the layout paramater is controllled by the statndard SAP objects.
Can anyone help me out in this issue.
Thankyou in advance.
*to get the default layout variant.
w_save = 'A'.
if p_vari is initial.
    clear disvariant.
    disvariant-report = sy-repid.
    w_variant = disvariant.
    call function 'REUSE_ALV_VARIANT_DEFAULT_GET'
      exporting
        i_save     = w_save
      changing
        cs_variant = w_variant
      exceptions
        not_found = 2.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      p_vari = w_variant-variant.
    endif.
endif.
*logic to check user authorization to change the layout setting.
if p_vari = c_layout.
    if not sy-uname is initial.
      select single * from agr_users
              where agr_name = c_role
              and   uname    = sy-uname.
      if sy-subrc = 0.
        w_save = 'A'.
      else.
        w_save = ' '.
      endif.
    endif.
endif.
Regards,
Satish.

Hi Maine,
Thanks for your reply.
As you mentioned for your own program, you can control the parameter "I_SAVE", when calling "REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY".
so already i have use the same logic and control the parameter through I_SAVE and here i am calling method ALV_GRID->SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY instead of "REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY".
and it works fine when we execute the report but the logic doesnt work when the user tries to change and save the layout variant on the output screen of the report.
Regards,
Satish

How to restrict the changes in Relesed PO?.

Hi all,
How to restrict the users to make a changes in the Released PO?. User should make the changes only if it is unreleased by the respective codes.
1. Is there any user parameters like functional authorisation?
2. I have already suggested two solutions to the clients that
1. To restrict the authorisation of TCodes ME22n at the user level, but it's not a suitable solution, if user want to make any changes before releasing, then system is not allow to do the changes.
2. I have made release indicator as a 1 - not changeable if it is released, in release strategy settings. But the system is not allowing the all the users including release codes to make the changes?.
If there is any solution, please reply immediately.
with regards,
Raja.

hi,
if u set release indicator 1, after release is taken place, for any changes, u need to revoke the release. and then change the PO.
even u cant directly block the changes to already released PO, because, in future if at all qty or some changes is required to change, it should allow u to change!

Restricting the visibility of Dataview

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for