Restrict the users to use the field Unplanned delivery cost at MIRO

Dear Friends,
I want to restrict some users to use the unplanned delivery cost at MIRO. It should be displayed as visible to enter for some users and it should be displayed in grey mode not to enter anything for some users. I am asking this to restrict some misutilisation of this field by some users. Can I restrict through profiles?
Simply, I want to restrict the users to use the field Unplanned delivery cost at MIRO through Profiles of them. Pls help me,, it is impacting our business.
Regards,
Venkata Reddy.Mudda

Hi,
Check the customization for unplanned cost:
SPRO -- Materials Management -- Invoice Verification -- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Incoming Invoice -- Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
Best Regards
Anamika

Similar Messages

Apps that arbitrarily restrict which users may use the App, such as by location or carrier, may be rejected

Hello,
I have an inquiry, this section:
Apps that arbitrarily restrict which users may use the App, such as by location or carrier, may be rejected
We have an mBanking app to be built and the Bank is insisting on forcing a mandatory update when there is a need
and the user should be restricted from logging in in such case (as a security update or important bug fixes).
Does the above fit in what will be rejected? Will the application be rejected in such a case? if so are there any workarounds?
Thanks
nsawaya

No, no, and no.
Sorry, but this is Apple we’re talking about here.
Bob

How can I find out the screen size of the users moniter using the Acrobat SDK?

How can I find out the screen size of the users moniter using the Acrobat SDK? I need to know how much sreen real estate that is available on the users moniter. Is there some call that I can make from the SDK to discover the maximun X and Y coordinates?
Thanks,
Gregory

Currently, I am testing on multiple moniters and it is defaulting to the moniter designated as the #1 moniter. For our purposes, this is acceptable. Once the two documents have loaded, the user can move and re-size at will.
Gregory

Unplanned delivery costs in MIRO

Hi,
In what scenario we use "Unplanned delivery costs" in MIRO.
We created the Purchase Order and did the goods receipts. At the time of Vendor Invoicing, we came to know that we forgot to enter freight value in the Purchase Order. We don't want to reverse the goods receipt, and we want to rectify the error in the MIRO. What is the best way to do this.
I have explored the various possibility in MIRO like,
a. putting freight amount in Unplanned delivery costs of Details tab.
b. putting the freight amount directly in the G/L (below in the G/L Account tab).
I just want to know "should we stop the users to do the mistakes in future (our user is saying - the SAP has given the option, hence we must use this). Our user is saying that he is not aware of the freight amount at the time of PO creation, hence he will not enter the freight value in the Purchase Order and will use the Unplanned delivery costs for entering the freight always.
Regards,
PK

>
PK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In what scenario we use "Unplanned delivery costs" in MIRO.
>
> We created the Purchase Order and did the goods receipts.
At the time of Vendor Invoicing, we came to know that
we forgot to enter freight value in the Purchase Order.
We don't want to reverse the goods receipt, and
we want to rectify the error in the MIRO. What is the best way to do this.
> I have explored the various possibility in MIRO like,
>
> a. putting freight amount in Unplanned delivery costs of Details tab.
> b. putting the freight amount directly in the G/L (below in the G/L Account tab).
>
> I just want to know "should we stop the users to do the
mistakes in future (our user is saying - the SAP has given the option,
hence we must use this). *Our user is saying that he is
not aware of the freight amount at the time of PO creation,
hence he will not enter the freight value in the
Purchase Order and will use the Unplanned
delivery costs for entering the freight always*.
>
> Regards,
> PK
If freight amount is only know at the billing then enter freight amount in unplanned delivery cost field.
In SPRO ,Maintain settings as shown
MM---> Logistic Invoice Verification -->Incoming Invoice --> Configure How unplanned delivery costs are posted --->
For required Company Code = '2'.
Create new g/l account in Chart of accounts(FS00)

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Unplanned delivery costs with MIRO

Dear experts,
Please help me out mapping following scenario -
We have created a PO without Delivery costs in Conditions as soon as the material is received it is unloaded into the stores by company owned cranes.
But in cases some third party cranes are hired to unload the material when compeny owned crane is down
in that case we need to pay the vendor for unloading services rendered by him (the vendor is not the same as vendor mentioned in PO)
how to map the same using unplanned delivery cost at the time of doing MIRO
Regards,
Pawan KHurana

Dear Pawan,
Could you tell or confirm the process of steps that you are doing,
Step 1: Create po for X material to the Y vendor
Step 2: Taken the GR
Step 3 : Invoice for unplanned delivery costs for Z vendor
Step 4: Posted the invoice for material Vendor
Is that the process for your secnorio ?
Thanks
Krishna Reddy

User exit on field Unplanned delivery cost - MIRO

Hello everybody,
I want to be able to put tolerences on the unplanned delivery cost, for example:
For Invoice amount = 1000
IF Unplanned delivery cost > 100 >>> Balance (Red) invoice blocked
Do you Kow some User exit for that ?
Thank you

Hello Jeyakanthan ,
I dont see any tax code field next to unplanned delivery cost in the MIR7 / MIRO .
I checked the screen layout , in that the field is there & is active . But it doesn't appear in MIRO / MIR7
what do i have to do in order activate the field ?
Regards
Anis

Unplanned Delivery costs in MIRO for different Vendor

I have an annual PO and I invoice it with normal MIRO transaction.
At the same time I have one service which I want to be a unplanned delivery cost for this PO. This service will be assigned to the material account and it is for a different vendor.
Can I do it in MIRO creating only the value in the unplanned delivery cost and insert a different vendor? In OBYC this is assigned to UPF category.
Can you please help me?

Hello,
You can use transaction MIRO to do unplanned delivery costs.
You use "Subsequent Debit" and insert the PO number (equal to invoice). The system will show the lines of the PO that were already invoiced and in the tab "Details" you should change the Invoice Party and inser the value of the unplanned delivery costs in the field "Unpl. Del. Csts".
If you don't have the costs in the PO for different vendor you must create like this...with Subsequent Debit. Only if you have planned costs in the PO it is possible to do it invoice and costs in the same document for different vendors otherwise you must have 2 documents (invoice for the material vendor and subsequent debit for the other unplanned costs vendor).

Control Unplanned Delivery Cost in miro

Dear All,
I want to limit the Unplanned Delivery cost by some %, say my Total invoice amt is Rs 1000 & i need to set 10% as the limit for Unplanned del cost field. so max i can enter upto Rs 100 here. How can i achieve this ?
regds,
CB

Hi,
Guess there is no tolerance limit which can be set on Unplanned Delivery Cost.
This feature itself is there to map any Unplanned cost in MIRO, hence there is no logic in having a tolerance for it.
Hope this answers.

How to restrict a user from using the transaction code SU01?

How can I grant a profile to a user with the profile SAP_ALL except running the transaction code SU01?
I know how to lock the transaction code using SM01 but is there any other way to do it.

Go to S_TCODE
Double click on it and give the combinations like        A* -   X*
                                                                             SU00
                                                                             SU02 - Z*
                     Try this one definately it will work.

Is possible to save the user that uses the download action in an interactive report.

Hi,
In my application I want to save who is downloading the interactive reports information in any format, is it possible?
Regards

Hi Eva,
As far as I know there is not an out of the box option that shows you the user that is downloading the interactive report. I guess you would have to write your own logic for that.
You can create your own logging table and a dynamic action with
1) a pl/sql procedure to insert the logging into the table, and
2) submits the page with the appropriate download format, eg. f?p=&APP_ID.:&APP_PAGE_ID.:&SESSION_ID.:CSV::::
As trigger of the dynamic action you need to use either of the download buttons, so I'd suggest the jQuery selector "#apexir_dl*"
Kind regards,
Vincent

How to find the user who deleted the contents of DSO.

Dear friends,
Can u please tell me ,how to find the user who deleted the contents of the DSO.
The user has deleted the complete contents of the DSO. We need to find the user ,date and time.
regards,
Vijai

Hi,
If the user has used the manage option to delete the contents of the DSO then the changed by field will be updated by the users name. In case a program is used for the deletion then it wont be the case.
Regards
Govind.

How to check if the user has only the display authority of a message

hi,
How to check if the user has only the display authority of a message but does not have the change authority for a certain message?
Best regards,

hi blake
though i am an application consultant and for authorisation u need to have help of BASIS person if u r not the one but still i can guide u regarding the same,
Basically Authorization Management
Use
You can use the following authorization objects to control the authorizations for maintaining business partner data:
        Authorization objects for the Business Partner:
             B_BUPA_GRP
             B_BUPA_ATT
             B_BUPA_FDG
             B_BUPA_RLT
Authorization objects for relationships:
             B_BUPR_BZT
             B_BUPR_FDG
In addition, you can assign an authorization group to a business partner in the dialog. The authorization group controls which users may maintain data for this business partner.
You can also define authorizations for fields and field groups using the Business Data Toolset (BDT). Depending on the settings you have made, the system carries out the relevant authorization checks.
In the dialog in the SAP GUI, you can display an overview of the authorizations assigned to you by pressing the button Settings.
For more information on authorization management, see the Implementation Guide (IMG) of the Business Partner, as well as in the Developers Handbook for the BDT under Authorizations.
IntegrationAuthorization management for the Business Partner forms part of the SAP authorization concept.
Prerequisites
You have made the necessary settings in Customizing of the Business Partner under Basic Settings--> -Address Management.
Moving over
AS ABAP Authorization Concept
The ABAP authorization concept protects transactions, programs, and services in SAP systems from unauthorized access. On the basis of the authorization concept, the administrator assigns authorizations to the users that determine which actions a user can execute in the SAP system, after he or she has logged on to the system and authenticated himself or herself.
To access business objects or execute SAP transactions, a user requires corresponding authorizations, as business objects or transactions are protected by authorization objects. The authorizations represent instances of generic authorization objects and are defined depending on the activity and responsibilities of the employee. The authorizations are combined in an authorization profile that is associated with a role. The user administrators then assign the corresponding roles using the user master record, so that the user can use the appropriate transactions for his or her tasks.
Authorization Checks
To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
The following actions are subject to authorization checks that are performed before the start of a program or table maintenance and which the SAP applications cannot avoid:
        Starting SAP transactions (authorization object S_TCODE)
        Starting reports (authorization object S_PROGRAM)
        Calling RFC function modules (authorization object S_RFC)
        Table maintenance with generic tools (S_TABU_DIS)
Checking at Program Level with AUTHORITY-CHECK
Applications use the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK, which is inserted in the source code of the program, to check whether users have the appropriate authorization and whether these authorizations are suitably defined; that is, whether the user administrator has assigned the values required for the fields by the programmer. In this way, you can also protect transactions that are called indirectly by other programs.
AUTHORITY-CHECK searches profiles specified in the user master record to see whether the user has authorization for the authorization object specified in the AUTHORITY-CHECK. If one of the authorizations found matches the required values, the check is successful.
Starting SAP Transactions
When a user starts a transaction, the system performs the following checks:
        The system checks in table TSTC whether the transaction code is valid and whether the system administrator has locked the transaction.
        The system then checks whether the user has authorization to start the transaction.
The SAP system performs the authorization checks every time a user starts a transaction from the menu or by entering a command. Indirectly called transactions are not included in this authorization check. For more complex transactions, which call other transactions, there are additional authorization checks.
             The authorization object S_TCODE (transaction start) contains the field TCD (transaction code). The user must have an authorization with a value for the selected transaction code.
             If an additional authorization is entered using transaction SE93 for the transaction to be started, the user also requires the suitable defined authorization object (TSTA, table TSTCA).
If you create a transaction in transaction SE93, you can assign an additional authorization to this transaction. This is useful, if you want to be able to protect a transaction with a separate authorization. If this is not the case, you should consider using other methods to protect the transaction (such as AUTHORITY-CHECK at program level).
        The system checks whether the transaction code is assigned an authorization object. If so, a check is made that the user has authorization for this authorization object.
The check is not performed in the following cases:
You have deactivated the check of the authorization objects for the transaction (with transaction SU24) using check indicators, that is, you have removed an authorization object entered using transaction SE93. You cannot deactivate the check for objects from the SAP NetWeaver and HR areas.
This can be useful, as a large number of authorization objects are often checked when transactions are executed, since the transaction calls other work areas in the background. In order for these checks to be executed successfully, the user in question must have the appropriate authorizations. This results in some users having more authorization than they strictly need. It also leads to an increased maintenance workload. You can therefore deactivate authorization checks of this type in a targeted manner using transaction SU24.
             You have globally deactivated authorization objects for all transactions with transaction SU24 or transaction SU25.
             So that the entries that you have made with transactions SU24 and SU25 become effective, you must set the profile parameter AUTH/NO_CHECK_IN_SOME_CASES to Y (using transaction RZ10).
All of the above checks must be successful so that the user can start the transaction. Otherwise, the transaction is not called and the system displays an appropriate message.
Starting Report Classes
You can perform additional authorization checks by assigning reports to authorization classes (using report RSCSAUTH). You can, for example, assign all PA* reports to an authorization class for PA (such as PAxxx). If a user wants to start a PA report, he or she requires the appropriate authorization to execute reports in this class.
We do not deliver any predefined report classes. You must decide yourself which reports you want to protect in this way. You can also enter the authorization classes for reports with the maintenance functions for report trees. This method provides a hierarchical approach for assigning authorizations for reports. You can, for example, assign an authorization class to a report node, meaning that all reports at this node automatically belong to this class. This means that you have a more transparent overview of the authorization classes to which the various reports are transported.
You must consider the following:
              After you have assigned reports to authorization classes or have changed assignments, you may have to adjust objects in your authorization concept (such as roles (activity groups), profiles, or user master records).
              There are certain system reports that you cannot assign to any authorization class. These include:
              RSRZLLG0
              STARTMEN (as of SAP R/3 4.0)
              Reports that are called using SUBMIT in a customer exit at logon (such as SUSR0001, ZXUSRU01).
              Authorization assignments for reports are overwritten during an upgrade. After an upgrade, you must therefore restore your customer-specific report authorizations.
Calling RFC Function Modules
When RFC function modules are called by an RFC client program or another system, an authorization check is performed for the authorization object S_RFC in the called system. This check uses the name of the function group to which the function module belongs. You can deactivate this check with parameter auth/rfc_authority_check.
Checking Assignment of Authorization Groups to Tables
You can also assign authorization groups to tables to avoid users accessing tables using general access tools (such as transaction SE16). A user requires not only authorization to execute the tool, but must also have authorization to be permitted to access tables with the relevant group assignments. For this case, we deliver tables with predefined assignments to authorization groups. The assignments are defined in table TDDAT; the checked authorization object is S_TABU_DIS.
You can assign a table to authorization group Z000. (Use transaction SM30 for table TDDAT) A user that wants to access this table must have authorization object S_TABU_DIS in his or her profile with the value Z000 in the field DICBERCLS (authorization group for ABAP Dictionary objects).
please See also:
        SAP Notes 7642, 20534, 23342, 33154, and 67766
guess this info will help you,there is one graphic which actually explain the hierarchy of authorisation,i will find some time out to let u know more info about the authorisation
but if u sit with ur BASIS guy then u can learn lot of things in PFCG
i guess u r a basis guy,then its not a problem
best regards
ashish

Module status on LMS is showing as incomplete - even after the user has completed the module.

Hi Folks,
Hope you are all keeping well! I have a bit of a problem here. On a number of modules that were developed using presenter - and custom animation (including click next to continue) etc etc, the LMS is not showing the module status as complete - even AFTER the user had comleted the module and closed. This problem has been noticed only when the user uses the CLICK NEXT or click this part of the screen to continue.
When the user navigates using the presenter control buttons - to navigate the training content that is, the LMS is correctly showing as the module has been completed.
The problem I am having is that - is there any way to make presenter detect a click within a slide (user click to navigate from within a slide) and thereby register it as a valid module completion?
Thanks in advance folks,
Kind Regards,
Alex.

Hi Shubi,
Thanks for you quick reply.
Shubhi Shukla Dubey wrote:
Hi Alex,
Which LMS server you are using? Secondly what is the Setting in Quiz>Reporting tab is it SCORM 1.2,2004 or Aicc.
You want status on basis of user clicks then please make sure that Report data is set to "Slide view =100%" (or whatever precentage you want) and Report Pass/Fail set to "Complete/ Incomplete."
Thanks,
Shubhi
LMS = cornerstone on demand. It has been customised to suit the company requirements, Reporting tab is SCORM 1.2
To circumvent the issue I have changed the % view to 0% so in theory when the user launches even one slide / page - it will set it to report as status complete.
However this is not a viable solution on content critical modules....dont you think so?
Ideally I would like to get to the bottom of why a button within the module (which is able to navigate between pages) is not being able to report / set / increment the completion status counter.
Thanks and Kind Regards,
Alex.

No taxing on unplanned delivery cost

Hi all,
I have an invoice in MIRO where I have manually entered the QST provincial tax - lets say $350.49. When I click simulate, the QST amount is fine (stays the same at 350.49).
But when I add an unplanned delivery cost of $5, the QST amount increases. It looks like it is taxing the unplanned delivery cost of $5 and adding it to the QST amount. Is there a way to prevent taxing on the unplanned delivery amount?
Thanks

Hello,
My requirement is when I create subsequent debit - unplanned delivery cost (tab details) using MIRO :
- the system check how much amount invoiced + current unplanned delivery cost to be posted compare to the tolerance limit.
Because currently, when I create subsequent debit (Tcode = MIRO) If I put the amount in unplanned delivery cost field (header level), it always go through.
but if I fill the amount in the line item, I got the warning for tolerance limit, and then if I post it, it will be blocked for payment -> this is the checking that I want for unplanned delivery cost.
Should I use user exit to have this checking ?
Thanks,
Melissa

Restrict the users to use the field Unplanned delivery cost at MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for