Retirement earnings .... Gross Remuneraration

Hi Gurus,
I got a problem in salary packaging: when i run a report i got the error message like Retirement Earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration. where i gone wrong. What should i do to rectify this error.
Regards
vickynaigan.

Lynnette,
You may have some cumulation errors in the wage types, especially /101. You can check this with the Wage Type Utilization Report (Transaction Code PC00_M99_DLGA20). On the control screen, be sure to fill in the country code and date. Then, darken the radio button beside the output type u201CContinuous listu201D.
Howard

Similar Messages

Payroll Error: Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration

Hi guys,
I get the following error message when i run my payroll...Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration. Any suggestions as to how i can solve this problem? Would be appreciated.
thanks.
Lynnette

Hello Lynnette,
There are certain wage types in your payroll not cumulated to /101 (Gross cumulation) but /102 (401K Gross which is retirement gross).
As Howard said, go to RPDLGA20 and look for those wage types and their cumulation class.
Arti

Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration

Hi guys,
I get the following error message when i run my payroll...Retirement earnings may not exceed Gross Remuneration. Any suggestions as to how i can solve this problem? Would be appreciated.
thanks.
Lynnette

Lynnette,
You may have some cumulation errors in the wage types, especially /101. You can check this with the Wage Type Utilization Report (Transaction Code PC00_M99_DLGA20). On the control screen, be sure to fill in the country code and date. Then, darken the radio button beside the output type u201CContinuous listu201D.
Howard

Mid Year GO-Live Payroll India.

Hi Friends,
WHat r the Wage Types we need to upload for Legacy Period in the System.
In T558 -C iam uploading the following wage types
Net pay
EPF Contribution
ESI Contribution
Income Tax
But iam afraid if we don't upload Earnings , Gross salary , the IT calculation will not accurate, experts
plz advice wht r all the wagetypes to be maintained for Legacy period.
Rgds,
sekar.

Hi,
If you go live on the SAP payroll system in the middle of a financial year, you have an option to transfer your legacy data into the SAP payroll system.
The system provides the schema INLK for transferring your legacy data. For this purpose, you need to perform the following IMG activities:
Define the payroll periods for which you want to transfer the legacy data. For more information, refer to the IMG under Payroll India -> Legacy Data Transfer -> Define Periods for Import
Define the type of data you want to import. For more information refer to the IMG under Payroll India -> Legacy Data Transfer -> Define Pay Elements for Import
Upon execution along with the payroll driver, the schema INLK formats the information defined in the above tables as payroll results and stores the values in the database table PCL2.
For more information on the Legacy Data Transfer functionality, refer to OSS note number 506128.
Warm REgards,
Kapil Kaushal

How to delete 0581 - Housing(HRA/CLA/COA) after PY execute?

Hi Friends,
Plz guide me 'How to delete 0581 info type' after executing the PY.
While am deleting i can see the status as "Record cannot be deleted (time constraint 1)".
I tried by deleting Payroll results & deleting the HRA, but am getting the same error as record cannot be deleted.
Its urgent, plz help me out.
Thanks to one & all for your valuable timings,
Kind Regards,
Saisree.S

After PY-execution, User updated me that for this pernr, they are not giving HRA amt, giving like COA, but user dont want to mention him under COA, his rent amt is included in his basic & company is providing more amt, so they are maintaining 'Other deductions', for this pernr & wants to deduct every month under deductions side. Basing on their requirement, I maintained 'Other ded' & amt is deducting every month & earnings/gross amt is coming correct, but deducitons side sap amt is not matching, so Net Pay differs.
As you said I removed the tick mark under exemptions, still it wont works....How can I go a head?
Once again thanks to everyone, all are giving their valuable outputs.
Kind Regards,
Saisree.S

Income Tax Projection for Retiring Employees

Hi Folks,
One of our Employee is getting retired in the month of August, As per SAP,In April-2009 his IT projection happens for the entire financial Year April to March 2010.
That is his IT projection for APril to March is 5Lakhs, but his actual earnings from April to date of Separation (till august) is 3.5 Lakhs, because of this his Tax liablity from APril to July goes high and in the month of August there is a refund.
Now for retiring Employees how can we make the IT projection happen only till the month of Retirement. Is their any standard process available or through custom development.
Experts Plz advice.
Rgds,
Sekar.

I have personally checked this, as facing the same problem. AND THIS IS WORKING, THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION.
HOWEVER THERE IS ANOTHER SOLUTION ALSO.
One can create an retirement action, which has to be executed for all the employees going to retire during the year.
system will calculate the gross and project the tax only upto the retirement date.
if exttn is required you can also config the retirement-exten action in case of extension is carried out.
Rather than touching the standard scheme this is the best way I know? you can also fetch the reports in the future with the help of standard reports.
However, if anyone is having any PCR idea, that is also welcome. Do give me a helping hand by share the same.
Edited by: virparkash on May 23, 2011 1:19 PM

Asset retirement error while posting

When am retireing asset through Tcode F-92, this error mesg is popping "Transaction type 210 not possible ( Posting to affiliated Company ) "

Hi Reddy,
Go to transaction AO74 and double click on transaction type 210, there in posting type section choose selection button as Post to affiliated company and Gross and SAVE
Now try F-92.
Thanks,
Srinu

Salary & Income Tax Projection for Retiring Employees

Hi Friends,
We have a case where an employee is retiring on 14.08.2014 (which is his birthday also i.e. P0002-GBDATE = 14.08.1954).
When we executed payroll for this employee in the month of July 2014, the system deducted income tax as per the slabs for a senior citizen (as Union Budget 2013-14, current year budget changes have not been incorporated).
The company wants the employee to be considered as a 'normal citizen/person' and not as a 'senior citizen' until his date of retirement or during the tenure of his employment.
What can be done to resolve this issue?
We are using
Actual Basis for Projection of Salary and Income Tax
Date Type 'N0' in IT0041 (Date Specifications)
Please suggest something.
Regards,
Kumar

I have personally checked this, as facing the same problem. AND THIS IS WORKING, THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION.
HOWEVER THERE IS ANOTHER SOLUTION ALSO.
One can create an retirement action, which has to be executed for all the employees going to retire during the year.
system will calculate the gross and project the tax only upto the retirement date.
if exttn is required you can also config the retirement-exten action in case of extension is carried out.
Rather than touching the standard scheme this is the best way I know? you can also fetch the reports in the future with the help of standard reports.
However, if anyone is having any PCR idea, that is also welcome. Do give me a helping hand by share the same.
Edited by: virparkash on May 23, 2011 1:19 PM

Partial retirement in fixed assets

Hi,
we are having one strange fixed asset problem.. today we have processed all the fixed assets transactions from january to may
2000.. we did a partial retirement of an asset in dec 2001.. like we had 4 units of it and we retired 1 becaz it was stolen..
the transaction worked in december everywhere (like in fixed assets, general ledger)..now in 2002 this transaction is there
in fixed assets but not showing in General ledger so our fixed asset is not matching with general ledger.. so can someone
suggest that where we did the mistake??? any help will be highly appreciated..please let me know if i'm not clear enough
becaz i'm new to oracle finance...
Thanks.
Sandeep

Hi Experts,
can anyone help me how can i identify what account i should be set-up in Account Determination of Fixed Asset
(Administration> Set-up> Fixed Asset> G/L Account Determination):
i am using SAP BUSINESS ONE 2007 A (8.00.181) SP:00 PL:47
1) Retirement: Net Method
a.) Sales Revenue for Asset Sales Net
b.) Asset Retirement with Exp. Net
c.) Revenue for Asset Retirement Net
2) Retirement: Gross Method
a.) Leave with Expense Net Book Value
b.) Leave with Revenue Net Book Value
I can not run the Retirement of Assets because this part was not been set-up
and Please do sent me also the copy of PDF to my e-mail.. thanks..

Salary Gross up

Hi
Is it possible to find the Gross up of the salary
Eg: if I need to pay the consultant $100. I would like to know the gross up for that 100$
Please let me know if any method is there for it
Thanks
Regards
Ramesh kumar S

Hi Ramesh,
I have a setup document for Bonus element gross up. Please follow these steps below. It may help you to understand the setups of gross up :-)
1. Define an element to be calculated by net-to-gross processing. The element can use the DEFAULT_GROSSUP iterative formula and the CALC_GROSSUP_PAY_VALUE payroll formula.
2. Define and link the element, define the iterative processing rules, define the formula processing and result rules.
3. Attach this element to employee. Run a Payroll and check the gross amount paid to your employee.
Please see the below example with detailed setups:
Define a Grossup Element
1. Navigate to the Element window:
(N) Total Compensation > Basic > Element Description
2. Set your effective date as per the requirement.
3. Enter the name "Grossup Bonus". You can also enter a reporting name and description for the element.
4. Select a Primary Classification of Earnings.
5. Select Nonrecurring as the processing type.
6. Ensure that the Multiple Entries Allowed box is not checked.
7. Choose "Advanced" tab.
8. Select the Gross Up check box.
9. Select DEFAULT_GROSSUP in the Iterative Formula field and save the record.
11. Choose "Input Values" button.
12. Enter the input values shown below.
Name     Unit Type     Sequence     Required     User
Enterable     Lookup     Default
Amount     Money     2     Y     Y     --
Low Gross     Money     3     N     N     --
High Gross Money     4     N     N     --
Remainder     Money     5     N     N     --
To Within     Number     6     Y     Y     --
Method     Character     7     Y     Y     ITERATIVE_METHOD     Interpolation
Additional Amount     Money     8     N     N
13. Close the Input Values window and choose "Iterative Rules" button.
14. Select each result from the DEFAULT_GROSSUP formula and specify how the payroll run should use the result, as shown in the following table:
Return Name     Rule Type     Input Value to Adjust
ADDITIONAL_AMOUNT Adjust     Additional Amount
HIGH_GROSS     Adjust     High Gross
LOW_GROSS     Adjust     Low Gross
REMAINDER     Adjust     Remainder
STOPPER     Stop     --
15. Save your work and close the Iterative Processing Rules window.
16. Choose "Exclude Balances" button.
17. In the Exclude Balances window, display the list of values for the Name field to see which balances will be included in the net-to-gross processing. If they appear, select the Total Deductions and Superannuation Total balances to exclude from the Grossup processing.
Link the Grossup Element
18. Navigate to the Element Link window:
(N) Total Compensation > Basic > Link
19. Set your effective date as per the requirement.
20. Enter the name "Grossup Bonus".
21. Check the Link to All Payrolls box.
22. Save the record.
Create Formula Processing and Result Rules
23. Navigate to the Formula Result Rules window:
(N) Total Compensation > Basic > Formula Results
24. Set your effective as per the requirement.
25. Enter "Grossup Bonus" in the Name field.
26. In the Processing Rules region, select Standard in the Name field and CALC_GROSSUP_PAY_VALUE in the Formula field.
27. Save the record.
28. Ensure that your new Standard rule is selected, and click in the Name field of the Formula Results region.
29. Select PAYMENT_AMOUNT in the Name field.
30. Select Direct Result in the Type field.
31. Select Pay Value in the Input Value field.
32. Save the record.
Enter the Bonus For an Employee
33. Navigate to the Element Entries window:
(N) FastPath > Entries
34. Find the person you entered in the previous practice.
35. Set your effective date as per the requirement.
36. In the Element Name field, select your Grossup Bonus element.
37. Choose Cancel in the Cost Allocation flexfield window.
38. Choose "Entry Values" button.
39. Enter 400 in the Amount field.
40. Enter 0.1 in the To Within field.
41. Ensure Interpolation is selected in the Method field.
42. Save the record
Run the payroll.

Technet retirement opposition

I'm asking this question again as there has yet to be an actual answer provided.
Will an IT pro targeted program be created to replace the soon to be "retired" TechNet?
The current proposed solutions offered in the copy and paste answers are simply insufficient for their expressed purposes.
MSDN: Is and has always been a developer targeted program
90-180 day trials: To put it bluntly only earnings reports work on the quarterly schedule. Our uses for the TechNet system have been consistently been research based initiatives that have yielded real world solutions for all (MS, IT, Dev, and end user.)
The forums will remain open: ... That's great, but what is it you would like to discuss? How great this software must be? Cause we'll all just be guessing around here.
Educational resources: MVA is a great idea, but it's still a work in progress. Really I've been digging my heels in over there and am getting great information out of it, but still it's lacking the robust archives to which TechNet has always provided
us access to. When it's ready, I agree it will be the superior service, but just not yet.
Again I know this question has been asked before, but I would really appreciate a response that more directly addresses our specific concerns.

I have to agree with all of the above. Technet is my #1 resource for almost any new IT initiative our organization wants to put in place. Our development/acceptance cycle for any new initiative is often more than 3-6 months and can sometimes
be a year or more. A 90-180 day trial is simply unacceptable.
It is incomprehensible to me that Microsoft would consciously choose to disenfranchise the majority of the IT community that is actually favorable or even predisposed towards their products, especially considering all of the haters out there. There
are other alternative to Microsoft products in the enterprise. This only gives IT professionals a reason to look elsewhere.
If Microsoft is concerned about software piracy, why not limit Technet membership to MCP's only? Don't kill the program entirely!
-jl-

Retire Asset by Scrapping ABAV

We are attempting to retire an asset using tc ABAV in 4.6c. We recently moved assets using ABT1 from one company code to another. We used transfer variant 1-gross method and NBV from area 01. Now we are attempting to retire asset we just moved using tc ABAV with a transaction type of 200 or 250 and we get a warning AAPO 123 - Asset will not be deactiviated - it has net book value. I'm trying to determine if this is an SAP problem or a problem with our process. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Dear Jennifer,
http://www.hostlogic.hu/caghelp/Transactions/Finance/content/abaon%20-%20asset%20retirement%20-%20sale/cc/html/index.htm
Re: Asset Value Date when Scrapping
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

Bal Adjustment with Earnings Ele doesn't update Tax Wages like FIT, CPP Sub

Hi,
I am doing a Balance Adjustment with the seeded Earnings Element Regular Salary in Canada Localization.
It adjusts only the Primary Balance but not any of the Tax Wage Balances like FED Gross/Subject, CPP Gross/Subject or EI Gross/Subject.
I used the input value Pay Value and the entered the right Jurisdiction Code.
I am checking the Balances from the View -> Balances -> Tax Balances form.
Please advise if there is some setup missing.
Thanks,
Ravi Patil

Hi,
Yes, I have been doing it using the Balance Adjustment forms only.
But only the Element Primary Balance is getting updated and not any other Tax Wage Balances.
Ex: If I do the adjustment using Car Allowance Element, the Primary Balance Car Allowance is adjusted by the value entered in the Bal Adjust Form but not Fed Gross/Subject, CPP Gross/Subject or EI Gross/Subject.
Ravi.

Query to pick up people of retirement age 1 year in advance

Hi,
I wrote the below query to pick up all staff who will be of retirement age in a year's time. This will be used in an alert that must go to payroll 1 year before retirement date, then 6 months before retirement date and then finally 1 month before retirement date.
select distinct papf.employee_number
, papf.full_name
, apps.meds_hr_util_pkg.return_department(papf.person_id) org
, papf.date_of_birth
, (select payroll_name from pay_all_payrolls_f where payroll_id = paaf.payroll_id) payroll_name
, (select first_name||' '||last_name from per_all_people_f where person_id = paaf.supervisor_id and trunc(sysdate) between effective_start_date and effective_end_date) mgr
, (select email_address from per_all_people_f where person_id = paaf.supervisor_id and trunc(sysdate) between effective_start_date and effective_end_date) mgr_email
, add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-12) date_12month_advance
, add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-6) date_6month_advance
, add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-1) date_1month_advance
, trunc(months_between(add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-12),papf.date_of_birth)/12) age_12mon
--into &emp_no, &emp_name, &org, &date_of_birth, &payroll_name, &mgr, &mgr_email, &retirement_date
from per_all_people_f papf
,per_all_assignments_f paaf
,per_person_type_usages_f pptuf
,per_person_types ppt
where papf.person_id = paaf.person_id
and trunc(sysdate) between papf.effective_start_date and papf.effective_end_date
and trunc(sysdate) between paaf.effective_start_date and paaf.effective_end_date
and paaf.primary_flag = 'Y'
and paaf.assignment_type = 'E'
and papf.person_id = pptuf.person_id
and pptuf.person_type_id = ppt.person_type_id
and trunc(sysdate) between pptuf.effective_start_date and pptuf.effective_end_date
and ppt.system_person_type = 'EMP'
and ppt.user_person_type != 'Pensioners'
and trunc(months_between(add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') )
||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-12),papf.date_of_birth)/12) >= 62
and trunc(sysdate) in (add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-12)
, add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-6)
, add_months(to_date(DECODE(to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON'), '29-FEB', '28-FEB', to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') ) ||to_char(sysdate, '-YYYY')),-1)
and to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') != '29-FEB'
order by 1
The query works only when I have this line in
" and to_char(papf.date_of_birth, 'DD-MON') != '29-FEB' "
As soon as I remove it I get an ORA-01847: day of month must be between 1 and last day of month error. I can't seem to figure out why because there is 1 person with a birth date of 29-FEB and I am catering for this in the query. Also, I am using TO_DATE for the values so using add_months and months_between should not be an issue.
Please help....maybe someone else can see something I am missing...
Thanks
Shalantha

Hi,
To find people who are 65 years old (or older) as of today, you can simply say
WHERE     date_of_birth <= ADD_MONTHS ( SYSDATE
                                   , -12 * 65
                            )ADD_MONTHS knows how to adjust for leap years, but it may not adjust for them the way you expect.
If today is February 28, 2013, the condition above will include people born on Februry 29, 1948. That's actually 1 day before they reach 65. If that's a problem, the solution is slightly more complicated.
If today is March 1, 2013, it will include people born on Februry 29, 1948.
If today is February 29, 2012 (or February 28, 2012) it will include people born on February 28, 1947, but not people born on March 1, 1947.
To find people who will be 65 years old (or over) 3 months from today:
WHERE     date_of_birth <= ADD_MONTHS ( SYSDATE
                                   , (-12 * 65) + 3
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables, and also post the results you want from that data. Simplify the problem as much as possible.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on May 26, 2011 11:48 AM

Venda de Serviços com valor de ISS no Gross Up

Olá pessoal, uma dúvida.
O cliente vende exclusivamente serviços, apliquei as notas 1706309, 664855, 747670, 852302, 916003 e 815720.
Efetuei testes para Cofins e Pis e está calculando muito bem. Porém o erro está no cálculo do ISS quando utilizado o modo Gross Up (Imposto fora do preço) pois ele altera o valor da ICMI.
Estamos usando a TAXBRA e a RVABRA padrão.
Criei o Tax Group 50 e todas as sequencias de acesso de ISS para provedor foram atualizaras como este grupo que foi configurado da seguinte forma:
Jurisdict.Code: SP
Valid from/to: 01.01.2014 até 12.31.2999
Company Code: ZXXX
Tax Rate: 5
Tax Base: 100
Iss Law: IS0
Tax-Rel.Loc.: 1 Provider
Iss WT: X
Min. Value: 5.000,00
Currency: BRL
Veja o detalhe das condições para o cenário abaixo:
Se eu coloco um preço líquido de 1000,00, com Tax Code I9 (ISS+COFINS+PIS+WHT) e Cofins sendo 7,65%; PIS sendo 1,65% e ISS sendo 5% (Empresa de Lucro Real na cidade de São Paulo) as condições ficariam assim quando utilizo cálculo dos impostos por dentro do preço líquido (Tabela J_1BKON1V)
BX70 COFINS Base: 1.000,00
BX72 COFINS Amount: 76,00
BX80 PIS Base: 1.000,00
BX82 PIS Amount: 16,50
BX50 ISS Base: 1.000,00
BX51 ISS Amount: 50,00
IBRX: 1.000,00
ICMI: 1.000,00
Net Price: 857,50
Tax: 142,50
Entendo que o cálculo acima está perfeito para imposto por dentro, porém vejam como fica quando altero para calcular por fora:
BX70 COFINS Base: 1.157,03
BX72 COFINS Amount: 87,93
BX80 PIS Base: 1.157,03
BX82 PIS Amount: 19,09
BX60 ISS Base Provider: 1.157,03
BX62 ISS Amount Provider: 57,85
ICMI: 1.157,03
IBRX: 1.157,03
Net Price: 992,16
Tax: 164,87
Neste caso, a ICMI assumiu o valor de 1.157,03. Entendo que o Net Price deveria ser 1.000,00 (Já que é o preço líquido sem impostos) e o Tax deveria ser 166,18. Veja como cheguei neste valor de Tax:
Fiz a fórmula de Gross Up sendo: 1-([ISS+COFINS+PIS]/100) ou seja 1-([5+7,65+1,65]/100) daí evolui para o seguinte resultado: 1-(14,25/100) resultando em 0,8575. Logo peguei o preço líquido de 1.000,00 e dividi por 0,8575 que dá 1.166,18 logo, o total de impostos é 166,18 e o preço líquido é 1.000,00.
Sendo assim, no meu entendimento as condições deveriam ficar assim quando o imposto é por fora:
BX70 COFINS Base: 1.166,18
BX72 COFINS Amount: 88,63
BX80 PIS Base: 1.166,18
BX82 PIS Amount: 19,24
BX60 ISS Base Provider: 1.166,18
BX62 ISS Amount Provider: 58,31
ICMI: 1.166,18
IBRX: 1.166,18
Net Price: 1.000,00
Tax: 166,18
Alguém saberia como resolver este problema? ou seja, alterar a configuração para que ao invéz de calcular conforme o texto em vermelho fique igual ao texto azul?
Obrigada
Fernanda

Pessoal,
Achei o erro, o problema está na retenção. Dentro do grupo 50 eu exclui os campos:
Iss WT: X
Min. Value: 5.000,00
Currency: BRL
Então a pricing retornou corretamente.
Vamos verificar todas as notas de retenção para corrigir o problema.
Obrigada
Fernanda

Retirement earnings .... Gross Remuneraration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for