RG23A Part II: Ii the Sum of Ecess and HECess column missing last value

All SAP Gurus,
In RG23A Part II register, in the total column, all the values of BEB, ECess and HECess are displayed correctly.
But the total of ECess and HECess sre coming wrong (last figure of every month is not considered in the total of that month).
Where may be the problem?
Regards,

Dear Piyush,
Thanks for your reply.
I have checked the setting as guided by you, its maintained as such. Please let me know what else can i check for. Also could be let me know what is the actual procedure to execute this process from buisness side. please

Similar Messages

I am trying to watch tv shows that i have purchased but part way through the show it pauses and will not allow me to play the show. What do i do?

I am trying to watch a tv show that was purchased but part way through the show it pauses and it will not allow me to continue playing the show.

That is correct.
That is the price of a replacement iphone once your iphone is outside of the warranty period

TS2951 I have a laptop (2010) with Lion OS and tried to install Mavericks and part way through the installation it quit and reverted back to Lion and the app store doesn't let me download Mavericks again

I have a laptop (2010) with Lion OS and tried to install Mavericks and part way through the installation it quit and reverted back to Lion and the app store doesn't let me download Mavericks again. How can I resolve this?

Is your data backed up?
Are you running any non-Apple system optimization tools?

How to find the sum of an advanced table column?

Hi All,
Good Morning..
I have requirement where i need to calculate the sum of a column in an advanced table.and i need to put that value into some other field.
i am doing customization so i can't touch the Standard page properties.so i need to achieve it through Pro-grammatically..
my column name is unit price in the advanced table region.so i need the code to calculate the sum of the unit price.
Thanks in advance
Bharat

Hi Bharat,
No need for Programatic way as Advanced Table already provides this facility.
The following steps describe how to enable Totaling for a column in the footer of an advanced table.
Step 1: In the Structure pane of OA Extension, select the column container for which you want to enable Totaling Any column except for the first column can be totaled. Set the Total Value property for this column container to True.
Step 2: In the Structure pane, select your advancedTable region and choose New > footer from the context menu. OA Extension creates an advancedTables Components folder containing a footer named child, that contains a tablefooter container (labeled tableFooter1).
Step 3: Select the tableFooter container and choose New > total from the context menu. OA Extension creates a tableFooter Components folder containing a total named child, that contains a new totalRow item as shown in the figure below.
Please let me know if you are still unable to get the Total Column
HTH,
Regards,
Syed.

Is it possible to get the sum of all true (checked) columns?

I am totally new to numbers, and I have just a vague understanding of excel, so I be needing some help.
I am a hairstylist and I am using my iPad for client tracking. My spreadsheet has totals referring to amount of clients, service totals, retail totals, average service tickets, etc. I also need to track my pre-booking. An easy way for me to track my pre's is to have a true/false check box column. Is there a way to add up all of the true checks? I have other factors I need to track like amount of services so I would like to utilize the true/false check boxes. I do not want to add the adjoining columns, just the true false columns. To clarify, I want to add all of the true check boxes with a resulting sum, of only the true (checked) boxes.
Hopefully I'm not being mega confusing....

Yes it is
Use the COUNTIF function

Matrial Value with freight and BED ECESS And Hecess

I need to know the function of the accrual key and account key in the PO pricing procedure.
I am unable to understand the system behaviour. In the case when I check the condition as accrual key required in the condition type that price is not added to the net value of the PO in purchase order. Say freight. I have checked the accrual key required for the condition type but when I created a PO in the netprice field ( which available in the condition tab ) is not getting updated with the base + freight....
same is the case with the

Dear Gaurav,
If you just check F1 help of the field accrual in M/06 you will get the idea it clearly says
Condition is Relevant for Accrual (e.g. Freight)
Indicates that the system posts the amounts resulting from this condition to financial accounting as accruals.
Use
If you mark this indicator, the condition appears in the document as a statistical condition.
It means when we mark the accrual check box for a condition type it always a statistical condition whether or not you mark it as statistical in M/08 which means this cost will not included in net price calculation
For more on these read this PDF document: [MM Pricing|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d09867e7-84d7-2c10-b9b7-da9e3b41392a?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&46321222296588]
I hope it clarifies

A partition tab is needed in the schema-table browser and it's missing

After a first sight with the product, I couldn't find a partition tab in the schema-table browser.
For those having partitions it is absolutely essential.

It's easy to add,
create a file that has the following content
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<items>
<item type="sharedQuery" id="PartSubPartkeys">
<query minversion="9">
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select 'PARTITION KEYS' PARTITION_LEVEL,substr(sys_connect_by_path(column_name,','),2) "PARTITION KEYS"
               from (select column_name, column_position
               from all_part_key_columns
               where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
               and name = :OBJECT_NAME
               and object_type='TABLE' )
               start with column_position=1
               connect by column_position=prior column_position+1
               union all
               select 'SUBPARTITION KEYS' ,substr(sys_connect_by_path(column_name,','),2)
               from (select column_name, column_position
               from all_subpart_key_columns
               where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
               and name = :OBJECT_NAME
               and object_type='TABLE' )
               start with column_position=1
               connect by column_position=prior column_position+1]]></sql>
     </query>
     </item>
<item type="sharedQuery" id="PartSubPartkeysFI">
<query minversion="9">
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select 'PARTITION KEYS' PARTITION_LEVEL,substr(sys_connect_by_path(column_name,','),2) "PARTITION KEYS"
               from (select column_name, column_position
               from all_part_key_columns
               where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
               and name = (select table_name
                         from all_indexes
                         where index_name=:OBJECT_NAME
                         and owner=:OBJECT_OWNER)
               and object_type='TABLE' )
               start with column_position=1
               connect by column_position=prior column_position+1
               union all
               select 'SUBPARTITION KEYS' ,substr(sys_connect_by_path(column_name,','),2)
               from (select column_name, column_position
               from all_subpart_key_columns
               where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
               and name =(select table_name
                         from all_indexes
                         where index_name=:OBJECT_NAME
                         and owner=:OBJECT_OWNER)
               and object_type='TABLE' )
               start with column_position=1
               connect by column_position=prior column_position+1]]></sql>
     </query>
     </item>
<item type="sharedQuery" id="Partitions">
<query minversion="9">
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select partition_name, num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED from all_tab_partitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME order by partition_position]]></sql>
     </query>
     </item>
<item type="sharedQuery" id="SubPartitions">
<query minversion="9">
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select subpartition_name, partition_name, num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED from all_tab_subpartitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME order by partition_name,subpartition_position]]></sql>
     </query>
     </item>
<item type="editor" node="TableNode" >
<title><![CDATA[Partitions/SubPartitions]]></title>
<query id="PartSubPartkeys" />
<subquery>
<title>Partitions/SubPartition</title>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select partition_position, partition_name "Partition/Subpartition", tablespace_name,high_value,compression,num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED from all_tab_partitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and 'PARTITION KEYS'=:PARTITION_LEVEL
         union all
         select subpartition_position, partition_name||'/'||subpartition_name, tablespace_name,high_value,compression,num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED from all_tab_subpartitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and 'SUBPARTITION KEYS' =:PARTITION_LEVEL
         order by 2]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="MViewNode" >
<title><![CDATA[Partitions/SubPartitions]]></title>
<query id="PartSubPartkeys" />
<subquery>
<title>Partitions/SubPArtition</title>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select partition_position, partition_name "Partition/Subpartition", tablespace_name,
         high_value,compression,num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED
         from all_tab_partitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and 'PARTITION KEYS'=:PARTITION_LEVEL
         union all
         select subpartition_position, partition_name||'/'||subpartition_name, tablespace_name,high_value,
         compression,num_rows,AVG_ROW_LEN, blocks ,LAST_ANALYZED
         from all_tab_subpartitions where table_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and 'SUBPARTITION KEYS' =:PARTITION_LEVEL
         order by 2]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="IndexNode" >
<title><![CDATA[Partitions/SubPartitions]]></title>
<query id="PartSubPartkeysFI" />
<subquery>
<title>Partitions/SubPArtition</title>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select partition_position, partition_name "Partition/Subpartition", tablespace_name,high_value,compression,
         Leaf_Blocks, Distinct_Keys, clustering_factor ,LAST_ANALYZED
         from all_ind_partitions where index_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and index_name = :OBJECT_NAME
         and 'PARTITION KEYS'=:PARTITION_LEVEL
         union all
         select subpartition_position, partition_name||'/'||subpartition_name, tablespace_name,high_value,compression,
         Leaf_Blocks, Distinct_Keys, clustering_factor ,LAST_ANALYZED
         from all_ind_subpartitions
         where index_owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
         and index_name = :OBJECT_NAME
         and 'SUBPARTITION KEYS'=:PARTITION_LEVEL
         order by 2]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="TableNode">
<title><![CDATA[Unabridged SQL]]></title>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select :OBJECT_OWNER OOWNER, :OBJECT_NAME ONAME, 'TABLE' OTYPE from dual union all select owner,index_name,'INDEX' from all_indexes where table_owner= :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name=:OBJECT_NAME ]]></sql>
</query>
<subquery type="code">
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select dbms_metadata.get_ddl(:OTYPE,:ONAME, :OOWNER) "SQL Statements" from dual]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="TableNode">
<title><![CDATA[Partition Columns Statistics]]></title>
<query id="Partitions" />
<subquery>
<query>
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select COLUMN_NAME, NUM_DISTINCT, LOW_VALUE, HIGH_VALUE, DENSITY, NUM_NULLS
         from all_part_col_statistics where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
         and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME
         and partition_name= :PARTITION_NAME
         order by column_name]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="TableNode">
<title><![CDATA[SUBPartition Columns Statistics]]></title>
<query id="SubPartitions" />
<subquery>
<query>
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select COLUMN_NAME, NUM_DISTINCT, LOW_VALUE, HIGH_VALUE, DENSITY, NUM_NULLS from all_subpart_col_statistics where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and subpartition_name=:SUBPARTITION_NAME order by column_name]]></sql>
     </query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="MViewNode">
<title><![CDATA[Partition Columns Statistics]]></title>
<query id="Partitions" />
<subquery>
<query>
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select COLUMN_NAME, NUM_DISTINCT, LOW_VALUE, HIGH_VALUE, DENSITY, NUM_NULLS
         from all_part_col_statistics where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER
         and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME
         and partition_name= :PARTITION_NAME
         order by column_name]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="MViewNode">
<title><![CDATA[SUBPartition Columns Statistics]]></title>
<query id="SubPartitions" />
<subquery>
<query>
     <sql>
     <![CDATA[ select COLUMN_NAME, NUM_DISTINCT, LOW_VALUE, HIGH_VALUE, DENSITY, NUM_NULLS from all_subpart_col_statistics where owner = :OBJECT_OWNER and table_name = :OBJECT_NAME and subpartition_name=:SUBPARTITION_NAME order by column_name]]></sql>
     </query>
</subquery>
</item>
<item type="editor" node="SchemaFolder" minversion="10.1">
<title><![CDATA[Sessions]]></title>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select sid,serial#,program,last_call_et,machine, status, sql_hash_value shv,sql_child_number scn
         from v$session
         order by 1]]></sql>
</query>
<subquery>
<query>
<sql><![CDATA[select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(:SHV,:SCN))]]></sql>
</query>
</subquery>
</item>
</items>
and add the following line to your ide.conf file (in jdev/bin directory in the sqldev install dir)
AddVMOption -Draptor.user.editors=fullpathofthefile(dir and name)
and restart, you'll get several additional tabs to the ones displayed for tables.
enjoy

Opening and closing balance mismatch for - RG23A Part II

Dear SAP Gurus,
RG23A-Part-II for the month of May 2010 and have noticed the following problems
1. The closing balance of last month is not tallying with the opening balance of current month. The balances printed in the register for BED, EDUCESS And HSEC are wrong.
2. We have utilized the CENVAT balance for the payment of duty for the month of May 2010 - J2IUN.
3.It is observed that even though we have debited duty under three headings, i.e. BED, EDUCESS and HSEC the register shows all the three debits under BED, which is incorrect
Note : The Table entry of J_1IPart2 for Accounting Document ex 200033141 does not show breakup for Education Cess and H&SEcess.
Kindly help what and where do we need to check for the setting?
Regards,
Prashanth

Its possible that some transactions are posted after you extract the report. Extract the report again (J2I5) and print them.
Have you configured different GL accounts for posting BED, ECS & HCS. From your description, it seems same GL is assigned for all three components.
Ravi.

RG23A Part 1 updation for 261 movement type

Hi,
We have a business scenario where the same raw materials are procured from both excisable and non-excisable vendors. When purchasing from excisable vendors, CENVAT credit is availed and RG23A Part 1 and RG23A Part 2 entries are updated. When purchasing from non-excisable sources at the time of goods receipt in MIGO 'No Excise Entry' option is chosen.
When subsequently materials are issued to production order using movement type 261, we try to consume this inventory from RG23A part 1 using transaction J1I5. However we come across cases where the material document qty is more than the balance qty in Rg23A part 1. This is because part of the inventory comes from non-excisable purchase.
In this case how do we update RG23A Part 1 for the partial CENVATABLE inventory?
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Ashok/Binoy,
Thanks to both of you for your answers. We are unfortunately not able to maintain multiple materials as the number of raw materials are very high and also maintaining bill of materials with multiple BOM's was considered not practical by the client. I then discussed the situation with the client's excise department with what Binoy had indicated. We have decided to make a "Part 1 entry only" during MIGO. The excise person indicated that this would be ok.
Thanks again for taking time to reply.
Regards,
Sridhar

How do I make a form field validate that it is the sum of two other fields?

Hi there,
I am creating a form, and I would like one of the fields to validate by making sure that this field is the sum of two other fields in the form. Does anyone have any ideas on how to go about this? I know I'll need to run a custom validation script, but I'm not sure where to begin - I've never done one for validation before.
Thanks for any help!

OK, here's a sample script that I hope will clearly demonstrate the general approach. It is intended to be the custom Validate script of the field that the user enters that value that is supposed to be equal to the sum of the two others.
// Custom Validate script
(function () {
    // Get the value that the user entered
    var sVal = event.value;
    // If it is blank, do nothing else
    if (!sVal) {
        return;
    // Convert string to a number
    nVal = +sVal;
    // Get the values of the fields, as numbers
    var v1 = +getField("text1").value;
    var v2 = +getField("text2").value;
    // Add them together, rounding to two decimal places, converting to number
    var sum = +util.printf("%.2f", v1 + v2);
    // Compare entered value to the sum of the other two fields
    // Alter the user if they do not match
    if (nVal !== sum) {
        app.alert("The value you entered does not equal the sum of text1 and text2. Please correct.", 3);
        // If you want the entered value rejected, include the following
        event.rc = false;
Replace "text1" and "text2" with the actual field names.

How can I sum up raws? the sum function seems to work for columns only and right now I have to create a separate formula for each raw

How can I sum up raws? the Sum function seems to work only on columns. Right now I have to create a separate formula for each raw

Hi dah,
"Thanks, but can I do one formula for all present and future raws? as raws are being added, I have to do the sum function again and again"
You do need a separate formula for each group of values to be summed.
If the values are in columns, you need a copy of the formula for each column.
If the values are in rows, you need a copy of the formula for for each row.
If you set up your formulas as SGIII did in his example (shown below), where every non-header row has the same formula, Numbers will automtically add the formula to new rows as you add them.
"Same formula" in this context means exactly the same as all the formulas above, with one exception: the row reference in each formula is incremented (by Numbers) to match the row containing the formula.
Here the formula looks like this in the three rows shown.
B2: =SUM(2)
B3: =SUM(3)
B4: =SUM(4)
That pattern will continue as rows are added to the table.
Also, because the row token (2) references all of the non-header cells in row 2, the formula will automatically include new columns as they are added to the table.
Regards,
Barry

Query to find the sum of different groups of same column

Hi ,
I have a table as follows:
customers
custid credit amt month
001 C 2000 Jan-2012
001 D 5000 Feb-2012
001 C 3000 Mar-2012
001 C 3000 Apr-2012
001 D 7000 May-2012
I Have to write a single query to calculate the sum of credit and sum of debit value separately.
Thanks & Regards,
SB2011

Hi,
SB2011 wrote:
Hi ,
I have a table as follows:
customers
custid credit amt month
001 C 2000 Jan-2012
001 D 5000 Feb-2012
001 C 3000 Mar-2012
001 C 3000 Apr-2012
001 D 7000 May-2012
I Have to write a single query to calculate the sum of credit and sum of debit value separately.Getting the sum sounds like a job for the SUM function.
Getting separate sums for credit and debit sounds like a job for GROUP BY.
Thanks & Regards,
SB2011Here's one way:
SELECT    credit
,       SUM (amt)     AS total
FROM       customers
GROUP BY credit
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only), and the results you want from that data.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say what version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.2.0).
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

ECess and SEcess should be calculated for BED

Hi Masters
We have created purchase order for a material with the following Tax conditions
For Example
Base value          :Rs.1000
BED @ 8 %        :Rs.80
SED @ 4%         :Rs.40
ECess @ 2%      :Rs.1.60
SCess @ 1%      : Rs 0.80
When I do J1IEX for the GR document for the above purchase order,the following scenario occurs
For Example
Base value          :Rs.1000
BED @ 8 %        :Rs.80
SED @ 4%         :Rs.40
ECess @ 2%      :Rs.2.40
SCess @ 1%      : Rs 1.20
The Educational Cess and Secondary Educational Cess are calculated for the sum of BED and SED.But our user needs the calculation only for the BED
I have checked in Tax calculation procedure which is reflected in the purchase order.It shows the calculation of ECess and SCess only for the BED
How to resolve this?
Regards
Mohanraj.C

Hi Mohan,
check ur Taxinn like this one
100     0     BASB     Base Amount
110     0          Calculated Call     100
120     0          Sub total
250     0     JSER     IN: Service tax     100
260     0     JSVD     IN:Service tax debit     250
270     0     JSV2     IN: Service Tax: Inv     100
560     0     JMOP     IN: BED setoff %     120
561     0     JMOQ     IN: BED setoff Qty     120
562     0     JAOP     IN: AED setoff %     120
563     0     JAOQ     IN: AED setoff Qty     120
564     0     JSOP     IN: SED setoff %     120
565     0     JSOQ     IN: SED setoff Qty     120
566     0          Subtotal : Excise Setoff     560     565
570     0     JMIP     IN: BED inventory %     120
571     0     JMIQ     IN: BED inventory Qt     120
572     0     JAIP     IN AED inventory %     120
573     0     JAIQ     IN AED inventory Qty     120
574     0     JSIP     IN SED inventory %     120
575     0     JSIQ     IN SED inventory Qty     120
576     0          Subtotal Excise Inventory     566     575
578     0     JMX1     IN: A/P BED setoff     560     561
579     0     JAX1     IN: A/P AED setoff     562     563
580     0     JSX1     IN: A/P SED setoff     564     565
581     0     JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor     570     571
582     0     JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor     572     573
583     0     JSX2     IN: A/P SED inventor     574     575
584     0          Subtotal for Ecess Set Off     576     583
585     0     JEC1     A/P ECESS SETOFF     584
586     0     JEC2     A/P ECESS INVENTORY     576
587     0     JSEP     IN:A/P SECess setoff     584
588     0     JSEI     IN: A/P SECess inven     576
589     1     JEX1      Ecess Setoff Sta     585
589     2     JEX2     ECESS Inventory Stat     586
590     1     JHX1     IN: A/P SECess SOTot     587
590     2     JHX2     IN: A/P SECess invT     588
591     0          Total Excise Duty     584     588
Hope Solve ur Query !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Dealer invoice with ECESS and HCESS : MIIRO Problem

Hi All ,
I have created a PO with Basic value 1000 , GR BASED IV is ticked and selected a tax code in PO where
JVRN (VAT NON DEDUCTABLE) condition record is maintained with 20%
and
JMOP (BED) , JEC1 (ECESS) and JHC1 (HCESS) with 0 value
and
Therefore my total PO value is now 1200.
JMXP (Set Off BED) , JEX1 (SET off ECESS) and JHX1 (SET Off HCESS) as 100%
Now I am wanted to claim CENVAT for
BED 100
ECESS 60
HCESS 40
The Step I followed are
1) J1iex capture
Basic Excise Amount = 1200 - 200 (VAT) - 100 (BED) - 60 (ECESS) - 40 (HCESS) = Rs. 800
2) MIGO Posted
Accounting enteries
GR/IR Cr. 1000
Inventory Dr. 1000
3) J1iex Posting
     GR/IR - CENVAT      200.00-
RG23A BED     100
RG23A ECS      60
RG23A HECS    40
4) MIRO
Base Amount (at Line level) = Rs. 800 [(1200 - 200 (VAT) - 100 (BED) - 60 (ECESS) - 40 (HCESS)]
Selected Calculate TAX , system is calculating TAXes as 300 and following proposed enteries are given by system during simulation
Vendor                1100 -
GR/IR                  1000
CENVAT CLG      100
Therefore there is a difference of 100 Rs in CENVAT CLG and VENDOR liability.It is only considering BED amount which is 100 , but not ECESS and HCESS.
In TAXINN procedure , accounting key attached with JMOP, JEC1 and JHC1 is JI1.
And CENVAT CLG account is maintained in OB40 for JI1 for my TAX CODE.
I am just wondering why system is only calculating BED not ECESS and HCESS ?
Need your advice.
Regards
Shrey

Hi ,
Problem resolved
Point to check
Condition type in "Classify Condition type" and in tax procedure should align
Record should be available in TAX code by country
OB40 , J1I GL should be assign
Regards
Shrey

Cvd,ecess and secess has to come automatically in import po

Dear Friends,
this is chandra shekar, here i'm facing problem in import procedure CVD,ECESS and SECESS , basicsustoms this all values we r entering manually but my client asking that this values has to come automatically in po when he create po , how to do this any one can tell me.
regards
chandu

hi
when u do a single transaction for the combinaion of vendor and material,velues will auto update in next po (info rec)
now as velues for all material and vendor combination is not same, giveing fixed value will make no sense
so just ask ur client to create pos for diff mat and ven
as he goes on system will auto update prices
MEK1 will only be applicable for the conditions with ACESS seq ,so for the import condition it is of no use
regards
KI

RG23A Part II: Ii the Sum of Ecess and HECess column missing last value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for