RGGD1300_FISL dump in ECC6 upgrade

Hi all,
In ecc6 upgraded system(from 4.6c) while running the program RGGD1300_FISL the error
Message type " " is unknown  has been displayed. It is due the following code.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
   MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
         WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
endif.
In the abv code the sy-msgid and sy-msgty were empty. So after executing the statement it throws an error.
How to solve this issue?
Regards,
Kumar.

not answered

Similar Messages

  • ECC6 Upgrade and EHP 4 because of a CRM7 in the landscape?

    Hi,
    I am in the way to upgrade my SAP 4.6c system to ECC6.
    In my overall landscape, I have a CRM 7 installed.
    Do you believe I need to perform a simple ECC6 upgrade or a ECC6 upgrade including EHP4 SR1?
    In other words, is it mandatory to go through the Upgrade + EhP4 because I have a CRM 7 around?
    Thank you,
    Chris

    Hi,
    according to my view upgrade from SAP 4.6c to ERP 6.0 EHP4 is easy because you can save your time in all preparation task that you to carry before starting upgrade as EHP upgrade itself takes time for preaprtion task....
    also, you can reduce the downtime of your production environment if you will directly go to ERP EHP4..
    As EHP4 takes significant downtime to upgrade the system ( also depends on hardware and database size)...
    Also, you can reduce probablity of error free upgrade by carrying out one upgrade instead of carrrying out 2 upgrade (from SAP 4.6c to ERP6.0 then ERP6.0 to EHP4)...
    Hope it clears to you...
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • 46C- ECC6 upgrade with EHP4 SAP_BASIS package not found

    We are executing an upgrade from 46C to ECC6 SR3 and binding in EHP4.
    We have successfully downloaded EHP4 using Solution Manager MOPZ and
    provided the generated "XML" file during the PREPARE.
    During the phase EHP_INCLUSION, PREPARE is stopping with a message "No
    matching SAINT package for 'SAP_BASIS' found".
    The KB70102.SAR and KB70103.SAR packages from EHP4 have definitely been unpacked
    and are available in /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in and we have prompted PREPARE to search EPS/in but it just returns to the previous error after searching.
    It appears from the logs that the upgrade is expecting a "SAINT"
    install package for SAP_BASIS and does not consider the KB70102/3
    patches as acceptable?
    Any clues as to why PREPARE is not accepting the SAP_BASIS packages and looking for a SAINT install?
    Below is an excerpt from the EHP_INCLUSION.LOG
    2 ETQ732 Package descriptions uploaded successfully
    4 ETQ399 Looking for SAINT package for 'SAP_BASIS' ...
    4 ETQ399 ... Read uploaded packages calling function module:
    4 ETQ399      current: name = 'SAP_BASIS', release = '700'
    4 ETQ399      patch type = 'U', ncvers-component = 'SAP_BASIS'
    4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages:
    4 ETQ399   patchType='U', langVect='DEFS'
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="CB1", Nr="00", GwHost="dbusrcb1", GwService="sapgw00"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "spda_read_new_packages" by RFC
    4 ETQ399   ismovesVersion='0'
    4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages: exit: rc=0
    4 ETQ399 ... No matching package found.
    Regards,
    Mike Tarr

    Ok, I was able to download the K-701DHINSAPBASIS package from Service Marketplace and this resolved the SAP_BASIS problem.  Thank you Markus for this solution.
    I also downloaded the SAP_ABA, SAP_BW, and the PI_BASIS components and unpacked those as well in /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in.    My upgrade is now stuck asking for a SAINT package for SAP_ABA!  I'm sure the SAP_ABA install, K-701DHINSAPABA, is unpacked and available in /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in.
    The SAP_ABA files are definitely readable and there are entries in table PAT03_SDA for them.
    I have a ticket open with SAP support but they have not had a solution yet for the SAP_ABA
    Solution Manager failed to identify any of these packages as required in MOPZ.
    I'm starting to wonder if anybody has ever done a 4.6C to ECC6 upgrade with EHP4 bound before?
    Any ideas on the SAP_ABA would be appreciated.  Here's a section of the EHP_INCLUSION.LOG file from PREPARE.  
    4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages: exit: rc=0
    4 ETQ399      Found: name = 'SAP_BASIS', release = '701', package = 'SAPK-701DHINSAPBASIS'
    4 ETQ399 ... Matching package found: 'SAP_BASIS','701','SAPK-701DHINSAPBASIS'
    4 ETQ399 (trc) R3upPatchDisassembleQueue: 1 package queue entries
    4 ETQ399 (trc) R3upPatchDisassembleQueue: force=NO
    4 ETQ399 (trc) R3upPatchDisassembleQueue: 0 packages will be disassembled
    4 ETQ399 ... ... INST/UPG SAINT decision ok
    4 ETQ399 ... EhP component SAP_ABA, 701
    4 ETQ399 Looking for SAINT package for 'SAP_ABA' ...
    4 ETQ399 ... Read uploaded packages calling function module:
    4 ETQ399      current: name = 'SAP_ABA', release = '700'
    4 ETQ399      patch type = 'U', ncvers-component = 'SAP_ABA'
    4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages:
    4 ETQ399   patchType='U', langVect='DEFS'
    4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="CB1", Nr="00", GwHost="dbusrcb1", GwService="sapgw00"
    4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
    4 ETQ233 Calling function module "spda_read_new_packages" by RFC
    4 ETQ399   ismovesVersion='0'
    4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages: exit: rc=0
    4 ETQ399 ... No matching package found.
    4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20090511150018

  • Unicode conversion phase after ECC6 Upgrade

    Hello guros,
    We have successfuly completed the upgrade from ECC5 to ECC6 EHP4.
    Part of our full upgrade plan is to also convert the system to a unicode compliant system.
    I assume something went wrong during the DB export , because now many entries that are supposed to be in hebrew in our database tables appear like gibberish (Its a trial system - dont worry).
    What I find weird about these occurances is that within such a table, some lines appear fine and even some rows appear fine in hebrew , whereas others dont.
    Let's take the system user table for example:
    (USER, NAME , SURNAME, ADDRESS).
    USER1 | שלום | עליכם | יקרים |
    USER2 | %%$% | אלי | #$$%#$ |
    USER3| #$%#$% | $##%$#%| $#%#$$%%#
    Unresolved symbols represnt gibberish.
    Is there  something that we might have missed?
    Thanks in advance, Udi.

    > Let's take the system user table for example:
    > (USER, NAME , SURNAME, ADDRESS).
    >
    > USER1 | שלום | עליכם | יקרים |
    > USER2 | %%$% | אלי | #$$%#$ |
    > USER3| #$%#$% | $##%$#%| $#%#$$%%#
    I would say that those entries were not correctly specified in your vocabulary as being Hebrew - OR
    Addresses have another speciality, they have a "creation language" field (LANGU_CREA). That field may be wrong filled if you e. g. create the user with an english logon and then change the user data to Hebrew (with Hebrew characters). The entry in the LANGU_CREA field however stays english. If you use that field now to decide the conversion of the addresse it will be converted wrong and you see gibberish.
    Markus

  • ECC6 upgrade phase XPRAS_UPG running for long time

    Hi,
    I am performing a Downtime minimized upgrade (MODPROF_TRANS) from R34.7ext2 to ECC6.0 / Windows2003/MSSQL2005
    Currently i am in the phase XPRAS_UPG .It is running for really long time.I tried to reset the phase but still went on for more than 10 hrs. I initialized the phase now its running for more than 7 hours. There are no processes when i check in SM50 and no log files updated. There is no log file called XPRAS_UPG.ELG.SM37 no jobs running.
    Though if it takes long time , How do i confirm that my upgrade phase is running ??????????as its not updating anything
    In PARDIST_SHD phase when there was en error , i have manuall deleted the DB trigger acording to the note 956198. And the phase went on.
    Now after reading few messages reg this error , i checked DB02 but no locks on any table . Have cheked note 558197,1292069,1142410,1138351,1062559,597885,551298. But nothings applicable in my case.
    Please suggest ...
    will really appreciate your help.
    Chandra

    Dear Chandra,
    Regarding long runtime for XPRAS phase kindly note the following:
    1. The reason of slow performance of XPRAS phase can vary differently.
    Basically during XPRAS phase, there're a lot of reports to run. These
    reports are inlcuded in the transport requests(both upgrade
    requests and support packages). If there's a performance problem,
    it very likely the database performance problem, such as wrong
    access plan was chosen, or missing index, etc.
    2. To find out the performance problems in the XPRAS, you can always
    logon into the system. During the XPRAS phase, the system has to be up and running.
    In SM50, usually you can find which report is running, and/or which table is being accessed.
    If you find some table accesses take unusually long time, please
    record the table name and find the SQL statement. Sometimes a simple
    index can solve the problem, sometimes you need help from Oracle
    to get the solution.
    3. If you want to shorten the downtime, you can select less support
    packages since all SPs have a lot of reports to run in XPRAS. But
    remember you need to import them soon or later. But if you prefer
    import them later it's fine.
    Currently if you check in SM37 then you can see RDDEXECL job in active status.
    Check for the job log, if there are any errors reported?
    Thereafter check the SM50 and see if its taking unusually long time for some particular table.
    If so then it might be because you might have not updated the statistics for that particular table.
    Also check what was the parameter value of Number of batch processes defined by you
    for upgrade. If you have defined very less number of batch processes for upgrade then also
    it will take more time.
    Check accordingly and let me know for further help.
    Regards,
    Abhishek
    Edited by: Abhishek Srivastava on May 9, 2010 10:57 AM

  • 4.6C to ECC6 upgrade problem

    Hi Team
    Iam not sure is it the right thread to post or not i have a strange problem,
    1: I have installed 4.6C on my test server which i want to upgrade it to ECC6 SR3 i have downloaded all the relevant software and the documents necessary,to my strange i found i cannot upgrade to ECC6 SR3 as my system is 32 bit/Windowns with 2003 server/oracle
    2:I got to know that i can upgrade 4.6C to ECC6 SR2 on 32bit system but not to ECC6SR3 is this right?
    3:can any one provide me ECC6SR2 upgrade label's i couldn't find it in service market place,I could see only ECC6SR3 upgrade software.
    ECC6 SR2 Upgrade Master label
    ECC6 SR2 Upgrade Exports
    ECC6 SR2 Language exports
    Thanks
    Uday

    Hi
    Even i have 64 bit system but i couldn't find compatable kernel for my OS
    My system configuration
    Systen Manufacture:INTEL
    Processore:Intel(R) pentium(R) III Xeon processor(2 CUP'S)
    Memory:6GB
    for this system i need to donwload relevant X86 kernel but i couldn't  find it in service market place
    i have dowloaded 1A64 bit kernel but it is not compatable and unable to  run SETUP.BAT
    Even i tried dowloading I386 kernel 51020564 but still iam unable to run SETUP.BAT  its saying platform not supported.
    Thats why i want to go for ECC6SR2 upgrade software
    Can any one provide me X86 supporting kernel label so that i can download it
                                              OR
    ECC6SR2 upgrade export and Language labels
    Thanks
    Uday

  • Dump in ecc6

    hello!
    During upgrade to ECC6 , i came across a problem i  function group Z_MM.
    there is new include WSTR_LMEDRUCKF1H, this include is missing in our prod syst in 46C.
    In this include there is field USER_EXIT_EINE  which is not defined, and is part of
    class CL_EXITHANDLER method get_instance in the changing parameters, it has type any.
    I tried to defined it in the top include, but i dont know how to do it.
    does anyone has a clue?
    regards
    yifat

    The data type 'Any' will accept all types....  Try the below one...
    DATA INSTANCE TYPE REF TO CL_EXITHANDLER.
    DATA SEEX_FALSE TYPE BOOLEAN .
    DATA IMP_EXISTING TYPE BOOLEAN.
    CALL METHOD CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE
      EXPORTING
        EXIT_NAME                     = 'HRBAS00INFTY'
        NULL_INSTANCE_ACCEPTED        = SEEX_FALSE
      IMPORTING
        ACT_IMP_EXISTING              = IMP_EXISTING
      CHANGING
        INSTANCE                      = INSTANCE
      EXCEPTIONS
        NO_REFERENCE                  = 1
        NO_INTERFACE_REFERENCE        = 2
        NO_EXIT_INTERFACE             = 3
        CLASS_NOT_IMPLEMENT_INTERFACE = 4
        SINGLE_EXIT_MULTIPLY_ACTIVE   = 5
        CAST_ERROR                    = 6
        EXIT_NOT_EXISTING             = 7
        DATA_INCONS_IN_EXIT_MANAGEM   = 8
        OTHERS                        = 9.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
               WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
    Regards,

  • Evaluation Path Results change after ECC6 Upgrade

    Hi All,
    We have upgraded to ECC6 up to and including our QA environment. We are running an old java version of the MSS team viewer. We have a custom evaluation path, a modified version of SAP_MANG (Z_MANG) that we have been using for years. After upgrade any view that involves an organization is showing duplicates...
    Example of output
    Organization 1
    Person 1
    Person 2
    Organization 1
    Person 1
    Person 2
    Our Z_MANG Evaluation Path looks like this...
    No     Obj. Typ.     A/B     Relat     Relat Name      Priority     Relat Obj Typ     Skip
    10      *                 B         008       Holder              *               S                        X
    20      S                A         012       Manages...      *               O      
    21      S                A         Z01      Salary Budg     *               * 
    22      S                A         Z02      HR Manages    *               *
    30      US             A          208      Is Identical to    *               *                         X
    Only when we skip No 21 Salary Budg is the problem resolved. Has anyone run into problems after upgrade to ECC60 that the results for an exting evaluation path have changed like this?
    Thanks,
    Doug

    >
    Doug Steckel wrote:
    > Hi Ranganath,
    >
    > Thanks for the quick reply. Yes the Skip flag is set on relationships 10 and 30. I would also think that would prevent this but it is not.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Doug
    not all relationships represent physical data records in the database.  some are derived and without looking at the system, I believe the US 208 to P is a derived relationship.
    Are you sure all the users you are testing with have a proper sy-uname setup for all respective pernrs in PA0105?

  • SAP_MANG Evaluation Path not working for MSS after ECC6 Upgrade

    Hello All,
    We are upgrading to ECC6 and still using an older version of the java/HTMLB MSS Business Package. We are seeing strange results in the vacancy request overview iview (team viewer like component)  which is using a view driven by SAP_MANG Evaluation Path.
    SAP_MANG looks like this...
    10 * B 008 * S
    20 S A 012 * O
    30 US A 208 * P
    Our View is ZRCPOS using...
    Eval Path - SAP_MANG
    Eval Objects - O_NACH_S
    Initial Evaluation Depth - 3
    Column Group - ZRC_VACREQ_OV
    Header Type - RC_VAC_HEADER
    The iview is meant for position maintenance and should show a dropdown of orgs. When an org is selected a list of positions/holders is shown to modify, delimit, etc. The problem is that in the dropdown "Select organizational unit to display positions" instead of...
    Test Org 1
    Test Org 2
    We have...
    Test User1
    Test Org 1
    Test Org 2
    ...so the user us shown as an org. Right off I suspected the upgrade to MSS 60.1.22 (the newest version of the old Business Package) so I installed the older versions of the components and the actually still worked but also showed this condition. So I have ruled out the java side as a source of the problem.
    Looking at HRP1001 I see the following relationships among suspect objects.
    Object P 1234567 to Object S 9876543 via B008
    Object S 1234567 to Object O 9876543 via A012
    no relationships US to P via A208
    Given the Eval Path above, does anyone have any idea why this would display this way or have a suggested approach to solve.
    Thanks,
    Doug

    >
    Doug Steckel wrote:
    > Hi Ranganath,
    >
    > Thanks for the quick reply. Yes the Skip flag is set on relationships 10 and 30. I would also think that would prevent this but it is not.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Doug
    not all relationships represent physical data records in the database.  some are derived and without looking at the system, I believe the US 208 to P is a derived relationship.
    Are you sure all the users you are testing with have a proper sy-uname setup for all respective pernrs in PA0105?

  • PC00_M14_CDTA ECC5 to ECC6 Upgrade Missing Selection Field

    Hi All,
    Found out Selection Field of (Pay date) during Upgrade from ECC5 to ECC6 on TCODE : PC00_M14_CDTA.
    More information you can refer to below print screen.
    Thank in advance for advice.
    Trevor Wong.

    This has been replaced by "Requested Execution Date". Here is the standard hlpe for this:
    Requested Execution Date on Which the Payment Is to Be Made
    Use
    In this field, you can enter a date on which the bank is to execute a payment. The date is transferred together with the payment information to Financial Accounting (FI), where the payment is executed.
    You can use the date to override the default setting or the date determined by implementing the Business Add-In (BAdI) Change of Requested Execution Date for the Payments (HRDME_B_ REGUH_DUE_DATE).
    In many countries, the system date is used as the default value for the execution date. In some countries, the payment date of the payroll period is used.
    Dependencies
    The following sequence applies to determining the execution date:
    1. The defined default value is used as the execution date.
    2. If the BAdI HRDME_B_ REGUH_DUE_DATE is implemented, the execution date is determined using this BAdI.
    3. If a date is entered on the selection screen of the preliminary program, this overrides the default value or the value determined by the BAdI.

  • Steps to replace match code objects with search helps in ECC6 upgrade

    Hi,
    Upgrade 4.7 to ECC6, match code objects need to be replaced with search hellps.
    SAP note provided by client but not understanding clearly. Can any one explain me the stelps to migrate the match code objects into search hepls.
    Thanks,
    Jwala Deepa

    Hi,
    Migration must be done by a developer who knows both matchcodes and search helps. It's not just like a procedure that you can follow without knowledge/without thinking.
    It's probably a little bit like forms (but far more simple), they often need to be "migrated from scratch"
    The first important point is where to find the matchcode object/IDs -> SE11 -> Utility -> Other DDic objects. Then you'll see that are the update type, base table, etc.
    There's a little scheme here to show the differences: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/3e/f3fc37eeb70143e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm (plus the general matchcode documentation : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/cf/21ef1f446011d189700000e8322d00/frameset.htm )
    If you need a procedure, let's wait, and see if someone has one, but it doesn't look promising as matchcodes are not used since a long time now.
    BR
    Sandra

  • IPPE in Equipment  - Consistency Checks -- ECC6 Upgrade Problem

    HI All,
    We're upgrading from 46C to ECC6. Currently 46C, we don't use iPPE and use IE4N to do install and removal for equipments (issue out reservations).
    When we upgrade and try to use IE4N, we get the following message:
    No structure gap exists at Equipment <XYZ> (warning message)
    No coresponding iPPE structure node foun for function identifier (hard error).
    We don't have iPPE setup on equipments, from the documentations on SAP, it mention you can set up on Configuration Tab on IE02. But we don't have that tab.
    So how can I bypass iPPE setup in IE4N? Is it part of the switch framework that I can switch off?
    I want IE4N to behave like before the upgrade. Any suggestions? has anyone come across the same thing?

    I have created an OSS incident with SAP. But they basically came back and said pay their consulting service and have them come out to help us.
    As a work around, I found transaction: OMPL1. It allows you customize the error level, whether its error, warning, etc. I turned IPPE error message from an error to warning.

  • 4.7C to ECC6 Upgrade - ABAP Code Changes

    Hi all,
    I'm in process of collecting information for our next upgrade.
    We are on 4.7C  and are planning to upgrade to ECC6.  We wanted to know what changes shall be required on ABAP side during this upgrade. e.g. certain ABAP commands which are obselete, few tables , few fucntional modules being obselete.
    Any specific functional areas/transcation codes being obselete which in turn would make Uer Exit redudant etc.....
    Could somebody please help me out with some info regarding this upgrade? Some links or any hint you can give would help me a lot. (Whether technical or functional..all very welcome!).
    Thanks in advance

    > We are on 4.7C  and are planning to upgrade to ECC6.  We wanted to know what changes shall be required on ABAP side during this upgrade. e.g. certain ABAP commands which are obselete, few tables , few fucntional modules being obselete.
    Read the following notes:
    Note 689951 - Release upgrade from 6.20 to 6.40 for customer programs
    Note 857904 - Upgrade from Release 6.40 to 7.0 for customer programs
    Note 1404458 - Release upgrade from 7.0 to 7.0 EHP1 for customer programs
    > Any specific functional areas/transcation codes being obselete which in turn would make Uer Exit redudant etc.....
    > Could somebody please help me out with some info regarding this upgrade? Some links or any hint you can give would help me a lot. (Whether technical or functional..all very welcome!).
    Check
    http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
    Markus

  • Multiline table binding only transfers one row after 4.6C to ECC6 upgrade

    Good day everyone,
    I have a workflow task binding that was working fine in our 4.6C system before our upgrade to ECC6.  Now when I run the workflow, I can see that a table in the container is only transferring one line in the binding to the next task.  I have verified that the first task successfully fills both lines of the table but the second line is lost when the container table is read from the next activity.
    I have tried deleting and re-creating the bindings, thinking that perhaps something had changed in ECC6, but I still have the problem.  Once again, the code worked exactly as it should in 4.6C.
    Does anyone have any thoughts or ideas?
    Thank you in advance.
    Geoff

    Thanks Rick.
    I do not attempt to pass the CURRENCYAMOUNT table back from the task that calls method POST.  I put a breakpoint in the method POST code and there is where I see that the container only passes the last line of the table.  Here's the code in SAP's standard POST method of BUS6035:
    DATA: CURRENCYAMOUNT LIKE BAPIACCR09 OCCURS 0,
    SWC_GET_TABLE CONTAINER 'CurrencyAmount' CURRENCYAMOUNT.
    So my thought is that CURRENCYAMOUNT should have the two lines that are in the container.  Also, note that this was working exactly as I think it should in 4.6C and the only change to the workflow was the upgrade to ECC6.
    Thanks again,
    geoff

  • Depreciation is not posting in ECC6 upgrade

    Hi
    I am on tech upgrade 4.5b to Ecc6. Depreciation is not posting by AFAB first error was doc number range is defined external and this should be internal.
    I have changed this AF doc type number range 03 as internal number range but still depreciation is not posting.
    regards
    imdad

    Hi,
    Please share the error message you are getting at the time of Depreciation run.
    Thanks and Regards
    Binoj M D

Maybe you are looking for