RH7.0 oracle 8.1.6 and Pro*c

Hi,
Can you help my ?
I was instaled oracle 8.1.6 on RH7.0
from standart instalation and I had problem
with connection to the DB. ( ORA-03113 )
Then I used HOWTO http://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/glibc/sdk/2.1/README.Oracle8i
and initialization and connection to the DB was OK.
After then I set new path for Pro*c in config file
./precomp/admin/pcscfg.cfg
pcscfg.cfg like this :
MODE=oracle
LTYPE=short
SYS_INCLUDE=(/usr/i386-glibc-2.1-linux/i386-glibc21-linux/include,/usr/i386-glibc-2.1-linux/lib/gcc-lib/i386-glibc21-linux/egcs-2.91.66/include,/opt/oracle/8.1.6/precomp/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/rdbms/include)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/precomp/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/precomp/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/network/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/network/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/plsql/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/plsql/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/sqlplus/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/ctx/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/odg/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/otrace/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/otrace/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/rdbms/lib)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/rdbms/public)
INCLUDE=(/opt/oracle/8.1.6/rdbms/demo)
and if I compiled some *.pc file with connecting to the db and when I tried run this program I got results
ORA-03113 end-of-file on communication channel.
Question is, How can I set evnironment and
pcscfg.cfg file for correct connection.
thanks Martin.
PS: I am sorry for my english

I find it,
mistake is on my side.
I use bad service name in command
EXEC SQL CONNECT user IDENTIFIED BY passwd USING servicename
null

Similar Messages

Configure MS VC++ 6.0, Per Oracle 8.1.6 and Pro*C

Hello All,
Could someone help in configuring MS VC++ 6.0, Per Oracle 8.1.6 and Pro*C. Per the Personal Oracle 8.1.6 document when I start locating Header files directory at C:\<Per_Ora_Dir>\Precomp\Public I could not find the directory nor Proc executable at Bin directory. Anybody encountered similar problem or could some one give some hint as where to look for it would be great.
Thanks,
Soum.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Oracle Migration Workbench Team:
The Oracle Migration Workbench will assist you in the Migration of the SQL*Server 7 DB. It is available as a free download from this site.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Oracle 9i Release 2 and Pro*C

I installed Oracel 9i R2 on my XP platform, it runs well but one thing I found out is that Pro*C (used to be included in 9i Release 1) disappeared. Can anyone shed a light where I can find it?
Thanks.

When using installer in 9i R2, look for the 4th option and you can then install 12 more product modules and Pro*C is one of them.

Upgrading Oracle 8.0.6 and Forms 5.0.6.8.0, Reports 3.0.5.8.0, Pro*C/COBOL

Hi,
We are researching upgrading to 10g(10.1) for database and Developer tools. The database is currently 8.0.6 and we use Oracle Forms 5.0.6.8.0; Oracle Reports 3.0.5.8.0; and precompile Pro*C/COBOL programs with the 8.0.4.4 environment. There appears to be quite a bit of information on the database upgrade. I am looking for Forms and Reports data as well as Pro*C and Pro*COBOL. The platform is currently AIX 4.3.3 ML11 and we will be upgrading to AIX 5.2.5 prior to the database upgrade. Would someone be able to point me to some reference materials? Are there any land mines I should be concerned with? Is this possible? Would going to 6i or 9i for Developer be an option if 10g is not?
Thanks!

Migrating Forms to the web:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/forms/pdf/forms9icstowebmigration.pdf
There are so many other related documents on OTN. Just go to
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ids/index.html

Oracle 8i lite and Pro C

Is Oracle 8i Lite Support Pro C ? if yes how to install Pro C with Oracle 8i Lite ? Is Pro C come along with 8i Lite CD ? or it has to be purchased ?

Hi,
I am qouting below from the oracle 8i Lite documentation which says it supports triggers . Please clarify.
Oracle Lite DBMS
Oracle Lite DBMS is a lightweight (50KB - 750KB), Java enabled database designed from the ground up for laptops, handheld computers, PDAs and smartphones. It supports industry standard ODBC, JDBC, SQLJ, and Java Stored Procedures and Triggers. It provides a streaming fast "C" interface, OKAPI, to its object kernel. It also supports Java Access Classes, JAC, a fast and easy way to make Java Objects persistent. Oracle Lite DBMS now supports all popular mobile platforms, including Palm OS, EPOC, and Windows CE, letting you deploy enterprise applications on virtually any mobile device.
Regards
null

Oracle 9i on Windows XP Pro

We are looking at installing Oracle 9i (Release 2) on a desktop here for testing purposes. We used to have Oracle installed on a 2000 Pro machine but we had a lot of problems with it and were informed that it was known that Windows 2000 Pro and Oracle didnt get along.
I am trying to find out if there is similar problems with Oracle 9i and Windows XP Pro. Are there any issues that I should know of?
Thanks in advance.
Trevor

Trevor,
I doubt there are any problems with 9i on XP that can't be handled. I used it for some time on that same OS without problems though I didn't do a great amount of work with it. Check the release notes they should say something about that.
One

Oracle 9i in windows XP Pro

Hi,
I was installing oracle 9i in windows XP Pro and it hung in half of the installation and none of the products were fully installed , so i can uninstaller to unistall to product. Now I am not able to remove the folder and it says some of the application is using the oci.dll .. How can i reinstall the products.
Thanks in Advance. Any help is appreciated.

Did you ever work out how to sort this out - I have the same problem!
The only thing I can think of doing is unregistering all the DLL's, and clearing any Oracle installed files and registry entries, but it's not a great solution.
Dave

Install ORACLE 8.1.6 and 9i on HP UNIX 11.20 (11i)

Hi,
When I install ORACLE 8.1.6 and/or 9i on HP UNIX 11i (11.20, hardware: i2000 workstation), I got the following error message:
Exception thrown from action: make
Exception Name: MakefileException
Exception String: Error in invoking target nnfgt.o of makefile
/opt/oracle/product/8.1.6/network/lib/ins_net_client.mk
Exception Severity: 1
Would appreciate very much if someone can help to analyse the cause of the problem.
Thanks.

Hi,
When I install ORACLE 8.1.6 and/or 9i on HP UNIX 11i (11.20, hardware: i2000 workstation), I got the following error message:
Exception thrown from action: make
Exception Name: MakefileException
Exception String: Error in invoking target nnfgt.o of makefile
/opt/oracle/product/8.1.6/network/lib/ins_net_client.mk
Exception Severity: 1
Would appreciate very much if someone can help to analyse the cause of the problem.
Thanks.

Oracle Single Sign on and Oracle Internet Directory

Hello Gurus,
What is the relationship between Oracle Single Sign on and Oracle Internet Directory.
To my understanding, OID is required to install SSO.
If OID already exist, can we just install SSO and go on integrating it to existing OID.
Great Thanks,
vimal jain.
[email protected]

Hi Tim,
I've been working on this and could reproduce the issue with anonymous binds. A fix will be ready in 4.2.1.
So what I really need is the password used for login to pass to the is_member call.The P101_PASSWORD item does not save state. However, you can access the value during submit processing of the login page, for example in the post authentication function of your authentication scheme. People sometimes put code in there to query the user's groups (e.g. with apex_ldap.member_of2) and save them in an application. This item value can then be used in the authorization schemes.
Regards,
Christian

JDBC Problem with Oracle 8.1.7. and OC4J Version 2

I use the following connection statement with Oracle 8.1.7. and JDeveloper 3 and Apache Server. It works fine.
String user = "scott/tiger";
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:oracle:oci8:"+user+"@RDL");
The same program does not obtain the connection with JDeveloper 9i, OC4J Version 2 and Oracle 8.1.7. I do not receive any error message, no exception is thrown.
Please help me.

Hi Avi,
I had already tried the thin Diriver but after yout help I try again.
With this thin driver, I received a SQLException which helps me.
As usual, there were a lot of different problems. The main one was that my default configuration do not use the jdbc/lib817 main jdbc/lib. There is a classe12.jar in these libs that are apparently different.
Finally, I obtain the connection with the "thin" driver.
Thank you very much Avi!
Reni

Key figure diffrence in Dev and Pro

Hi Experts,
I have one cube in Dev and Production but key figure Current Price out put is difference in both
like dev it comes 30.12 and in production getting like 30,12.
but make sure i am using same keyfigure.
Thanks
David

Check the user default settings in SU01D tcode in dev and pro.
SU01D -> enter ur user id -> goto Default tab and check the decimal notation.
I guess it is 1,234,567.89 in DEV and 1.234.567,89 in PRO.
Please make sure that this setting is same in DEV and PRO.
you can ask your basis consultant to changes the settings....
--- Thanks...

Oracle application server 10g and apex

Hi allm
Can someone show me a guide on how to use Oracle Application Server 10g with APEX. I'm currently using Oracle HTTP Server but decided to use OAS instead so that I can use the Report Server and the Oracle BI Publisher for the reports.
I'm currently using this guide (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/howtos/howto_useoas10g.html) but I can't seem to find the marvel.conf and the oracle_apache.conf.
Also, is it really necessary to use OAS instead of Oracle HTTP Server if I want to use Oracle BI Publisher?
Thanks.
Allen
Edited by: A.Sandiego on Sep 3, 2008 12:01 AM

Hi,
Thanks for the response.
Unfortunately I still get the same problem. Somehow I just can't find the marvel.conf anywhere in my machine. I setup my APEX not by using the companion cd but by downloading the apex_3.1.2 then running the apexins.sql. Then install the Oracle HTTP Server only and configured the dads.conf located in the ORACLE_HTTP_SERVER_HOME/Apache/Apache/mod_plsql/conf. It works perfectly with this.
I then installed Oracle Application Server 10g. I'm trying to figure out how to use this instead of the Oracle HTTP Server.
Thanks.
Allen

How to configure Oracle SSO for forms and apex

Hi All,
I am trying to configure oracle SSO for forms and apex using third party external authentication. Please help me how to configure. I a have tried all possible things
from web but I am not able to do it. Is there any doc or links are much appreciated.
Info: Some reason my oiddas web link is not working it used to work fine before and also the from /pls/orasso/ link I am not able to login may be because of my oiddas issue
Thanks

Hi Andreas,
Thanks you for your help. I am trying to implement third party external LDAP authentication for APEX and Forms.
So I started with OID and SSO setup to create external Partner Applications. Some reason my oid and sso web login links are not working. I didn't find any errors. I need some help in finding the problem and direction, I already read docs on web but no proper direction. I appreciate your help.
Thanks

How can I uninstall a damaged installation of Fusion - PFRD 11.1.1.6.0 - Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer

Hello,
I am upgrading EBS 11i to 12i, Discoverer 4 to 11. After completing ebs installation and upgrade successfully, I am now working on the Oracle Fusion piece of the upgrade.
I have installed
1. JDK
2. Repository Creation Utility - RCU (schema)
3. Weblogic - WLS 10.3.6
4. Oracle Fusion - Discoverer 11g Release 1 Patchset 1 11.1.1.2.0 PFRD
5. Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g Patchset 11.1.1.6.0 - Patchset 13517084
6. Executed config.sh and it failed with but continued.
During the Configuration of Oracle Fusion with config.sh there was failure at with "fails at creating data sources" and accidentally proceeded and all seem to go well until after shutting down the servers when Weblogic Managed Server is unable to start.
The start log indicated: "weblogic.store.PersistentStoreFatalException: [Store:280105]The persistent file store "_WLS_WLS_DISCO" cannot open file _WLS_WLS_DISCO000000.DAT." and I have been unable to find a solution for this error?
See log file error at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15497130/oracle/ebs11/startManagedWebLogic.sh_nohup.out
If re-installation is my only option, then what are the steps to uninstall, and which components do I have to uninstall given that I had upgraded all the schemas involved?
Mathias

Hey,
You can always change the JDBC datasources in the Weblogic admin console . but have you recorded what is the specific error you got during the datasources creation .
I prefer...create a new user , give him sysdba privillages . Start RCU and create the DEV_DISCOVERER , DEV_DISCOVERER_PS schemas (prefix is your choice)
The Admin server will start . so go to admin console .
click services -> Data Sources
Check the data sources you have . edit each datasource and update the connection pool information .
after this you can start the Managed server WLS_DISCO
i believe this will solve this .........
if you still get issue again . you can try the link Using the WebLogic Persistent Store
Thanks
Naga

Different Database Behavior for UAT and PRO in same DB

Hi All,
The UAT and Production Documentum schemas reside in the same database instance referring to different applications.
Problem is when I run the same query to production it send me result in a second but in UAT it takes for ever and also its shows the different plan if do explain in UAT and PRO.
OS windows 64Bit
DB 10.2.0.3
There is frequent, automated data load.
The indexes are rebuilt every other day.
SQL on UAT
select all dm_folder.r_object_id, dm_folder.object_name, dm_repeating.i_folder_id, dm_repeating.r_folder_path from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where (dm_folder.r_object_id in (select all dm_repeating.i_ancestor_id from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where ((dm_folder.r_object_id='0b01b3f18000b897') and (dm_folder.a_is_hidden=0)) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id )) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id order by dm_folder.r_object_id
Explain Plan on UAT
This sql ran forever. An execution plan was gotten for the SQL. Note the MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN with 404 million rows and 34 GB of data highlighted in red.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1131176958
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 132 | 21M (1)| 70:20:41 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 1 | 132 | 21M (1)| 70:20:41 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 15087 | 1723K| 21M (1)| 70:08:37 |
| 3 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 404M| 34G| 802K (1)| 02:40:32 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9854 | 606K| 382 (1)| 00:00:05 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 22358 | 1026K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 |
| 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 26813 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | BUFFER SORT | | 41065 | 1162K| 802K (1)| 02:40:32 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DM_FOLDER_R | 41065 | 1162K| 81 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 1 | 25 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 1 | 15 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 190 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 304 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 42 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 4 | 136 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND_UT | 4 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | 19 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("YB_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "YB_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
7 - access("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="OG_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
11 - access("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="PG_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND
"ZB_"."I_POSITION"="PG_"."I_POSITION")
filter("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
12 - filter("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
16 - access("OG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
17 - filter("YB_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "YB_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0 AND "YB_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0)
18 - access("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
20 - access("PG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
21 - access("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897' AND "ZB_"."I_POSITION"="PG_"."I_POSITION")
SQL on Production
The following sql was run through sqlplus on production. It is identical to the one run on UAT with the exception that a different r_object_id is used.
select all dm_folder.r_object_id, dm_folder.object_name, dm_repeating.i_folder_id, dm_repeating.r_folder_path from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where (dm_folder.r_object_id in (select all dm_repeating.i_ancestor_id from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where ((dm_folder.r_object_id='0b01b3f080011726') and (dm_folder.a_is_hidden=0)) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id )) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id order by dm_folder.r_object_id
Explain Plan on Production
This query ran very quickly. The query plan does not contain a MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3553258581
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 650 | 9 (12)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9 | 936 | 8 (13)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 234 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 186 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 3 | 48 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 3 | 279 | | |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 279 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 365 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 5 | 175 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15| INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND | 5 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 1 | 20 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 46 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 3 | 78 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21| INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 23| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000144 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
11 - access("TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
12 - filter("GJ_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
13 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
15 - access("VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
16 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726' AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
17 - filter("GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
19 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
21 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
23 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
Message was edited by:
user624068

I am gathering the statistics for the full database statement is .
execute dbms_stats.gather_database_stats(ESTIMATE_PERCENT => 99, CASCADE => TRUE)
I tried to gather the stats on schema but no effect.
No of indexes are same in UAT and Pro.
I am still confuse if we have less data do it change the plan and if it did it should be faster.
Thats the max it got format. is there any other way i can format that or send u.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3842135587
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 384 | 14M (1)| 47:28:20 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 3 | 384 | 14M (1)| 47:28:20 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 10269 | 1133K| 14M (1)| 47:20:08 |
| 3 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 273M| 22G| 541K (1)| 01:48:20 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 6648 | 383K| 412 (0)| 00:00:05 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 6648 | 279K| 411 (0)| 00:00:05 |
| 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 26592 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | BUFFER SORT | | 41076 | 1163K| 541K (1)| 01:48:20 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DM_FOLDER_R | 41076 | 1163K| 81 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 1 | 25 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 1 | 15 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 182 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 288 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 4 | 136 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000144 | 4 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | 19 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("RG_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "RG_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
7 - access("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="WQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
11 - access("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="XQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND
"SG_"."I_POSITION"="XQ_"."I_POSITION")
filter("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
12 - filter("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
16 - access("WQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
17 - filter("RG_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "RG_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "RG_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
20 - access("XQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
21 - access("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897' AND "SG_"."I_POSITION"="XQ_"."I_POSITION")
Production Explan
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3553258581
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 650 | 9 (12)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9 | 936 | 8 (13)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 234 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 186 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 3 | 48 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 3 | 279 | | |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 279 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 365 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 5 | 175 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND | 5 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 1 | 20 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 46 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 3 | 78 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 23 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000144 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
11 - access("TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
12 - filter("GJ_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
13 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
15 - access("VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
16 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726' AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
17 - filter("GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
19 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
21 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
23 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
Message was edited by:
user624068

RH7.0 oracle 8.1.6 and Pro*c

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for