Role Assignment changes Duration

I must be going nuts. I need to assign a role to a task
with a duration of 90
days, and have him only
devote a total of 90 hours to that task over the <br
/>entire 90 days' duration.
<br
/>When I assign the role, and change the BLU to 90, it
changes the OD to 11.
If I go back and change
the OD back to 90, P6.1 sets the RD to (90-11) 79. If
I then go and change the RD to 90, it resets
the Role's BLU to 720. It's a
big circle I
need to escape. I've never had this issue in P3. What am I
doing
wrong? Some setting? I looked, but I
just can't figure it out.
PS...I
did convert this project over from MSP2007, but I haven't
had this issue with other conversions.
<br
/>Basically, I need a role to spend only an hour a day
on this task for a
duration of 90 days. How do
I do that?
Jim

Check your Duration Type. It helps if it were "Fixed
Duration and Units" or "Fixed Duration and
Units/Time". Then you enter the OD and Units/Time or
Units.
Cheers

Similar Messages

Mass Change for Indirect Role Assignment

Hi all,
I am in the process of changing the companys authorisations from a standard SU01 role assignment to a position based indirect role assignment.
At the moment I am using PFCG going to the Org Mg button under the User tab then attaching the position that way. Is there a way of assigning more than one role to a position at the same time?
Is there a Mass Assignment option in PFCG or is there a separate transaction available to make this process quicker??
Thanks for your help
Ian

you can mass-assign people and roles if you go to transaction PPOME instead of PFCG. to make role assignments from PPOME please apply note 578271 first. be careful whilst implementing this <insert nasty word here> note because some of those view-clusters tend to refuse to load your changes = you can see them, but they don't work - might be you will have to flush table buffers for the changes to take effect.

Srm User interface - change settings : Error in role assignment

Hi Gurus,
Users are facing issue when they are changing settings in the SRM user interface site .
Go to SRM user interface SIte --> Change my settings --> change date format or decimal format .
When they save it --> Gets an error - error in role assignment .
What can be the issue. It's same in Dev and qa .
Waiting for your reply.
Points will be rewared .
Thanks
Munish Kumar

Hello Munish,
Laurent Burtaire wrote:
If you do a where-used for message number i gave you, you will find two message calls in methods from /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_MO_USER_ACCOUNT class.
Put a break-point to check if one of them is done. Problem cannot be due to missing authorization as there is no data in SU53 for concerned user.
Regards.
Laurent.

Role assignment to users (Change documents)

Hi
I was looking through the change documents for users and here i came across "START_REPORT" under the Transaction column along with SU01 and PFCG. I was not quite sure about what this "STATUS_REPORT" was all about. I was wondering if this is a program. It certainly is not a batch coz we dont run batches here. I am trying to track down this change to the user but STATUS_REPORT is leading me nowhere....
Any ideas?
ravi

Hi ravi
Could you please explain the problem once more ?
If you want to see the changes in the profiles of the user(which i take as one example of change documents) then you can use the transaction SUIM and there it'll give you options for change documents as below:
1) For users
2) For role assignment
3) For Roles
4) For profiles
5) For authorizations
and then you can choose the option you want.
If I can help in some other way then kindly let me know.
Cheers

Need to delet or assign individual roles without changing all existing role

Hi
I am looking for a way in order to delete or add single roles without touching all other roles a user has.
I found various BAPI_USER_* , however they always change the entire role assignment.
Does anybody got an idea or an associated BAPI`?
Thanks a lot,
Kind regards,
Mingolo

Hello Minima
The corresponding BAPI is BAPI_USER_ACTGROUPS_ASSIGN. In to delete only specific roles you first have to read the assigned roles of the user using BAPI BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL.
Now here the procedure:
(1) Read the assigned roles for a given user using BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL. The roles are returned in TABLES parameter ACTIVITYGROUPS.
(2) Delete the role you want to unassigned from ACTIVITYGROUPS.
(3) Change the user using BAPI_USER_ACTGROUPS_ASSIGN with the modified list of roles (in ACTIVITYGROUPS).
The logic behind this is as follows:
- the BAPI BAPI_USER_ACTGROUPS_ASSIGN compared the imported list of roles with the currently assigned roles.
- If one is missing, it is unassigned.
- If one is new, it is assigned.
- All others role assignements remain.
Regards
Uwe

Background job fails for BDC profile creation and role assignment

Hi Experts,
I have created a BDC Function module for Tcode 'PFCG' for profile creation and role assignment, and called this FM in my zprogram. the problem is that when i run this program in foreground it executes succesfully, but if i schedule it in background it fails throwing error in job log 'Role 'Z...' does not contain any active authorizations'. But i have created one more program to create authorization objects which runs before this zprogram.I have also checked the authorization object in 'RSECADMIN', it reflects active. I dont understand whats happening exactly when it runs background.
Below is the process of job
   1. ZMIS_AUTH_OBJECT_CREATE
       Variant : auth-create
   2. ZMIS_AUTH_ASSIGN_TO_ROLE
       Variant : auth-assign
The problem is in second program, runs in foreground but fails in background.
Code which i have written in my second program
***BDC for Profile creation and assignment to Roles
    CALL FUNCTION 'ZROLE'
      EXPORTING
       ctu                     = 'X'
       mode                    = p_mode
       UPDATE                  = 'L'
*   GROUP                   =
*   USER                    =
*   KEEP                    =
*   HOLDDATE                =
       nodata                  = '/'
        agr_name_neu_001        = wa_role-role_name
        text_002                = wa_role-desc
        text_003                = wa_role-desc
        text_004                = wa_role-desc
       value_01_005            = 'T-ML330881'
        h_fval_low_01_006       = wa_role-auth
        profn_007               = lv_profile
        ptext_008               = lv_text1
* IMPORTING
*   SUBRC                   =
     TABLES
       messtab                 = temp_message.
***Generation of Profile created
CALL FUNCTION 'PRGN_AUTO_GENERATE_PROFILE_NEW'
     EXPORTING
       activity_group                      = wa_role-role_name
*     PROFILE_NAME                        =
*     PROFILE_TEXT                        =
      no_dialog                           = ' '
      rebuild_auth_data                   = ''
      org_levels_with_star                = ' '
      fill_empty_fields_with_star         = 'X'
      template                            = ' '
      check_profgen_tables                = 'X'
      generate_profile                    = 'X'
      authority_check_pfcg                = 'X'
   EXCEPTIONS
     activity_group_does_not_exist       = 1
     activity_group_enqueued             = 2
     profile_name_exists                 = 3
     profile_not_in_namespace            = 4
     no_auth_for_prof_creation           = 5
     no_auth_for_role_change             = 6
     no_auth_for_auth_maint              = 7
     no_auth_for_gen                     = 8
     no_auths                            = 9
     open_auths                          = 10
     too_many_auths                      = 11
     profgen_tables_not_updated          = 12
     error_when_generating_profile       = 13
     OTHERS                              = 14 .
Experts please help me out its very urgent. your help is appreciated and rewarded. Thanking you in advance.
Regards,
Chetan

Hi Praveen,
Yeah definately, my requirement is that I have to access of some BI reports to certain users, so contract data will be downlaoded from ECC on application server, need to read that file from application server and for the each contract i ahould create a authorization object, role creation and assigning of role to the user and profile generation and activation.
To achieve this i have written two programs
1) ZMIS_AUTH_OBJECT_CREATE- This program will create the Authorization Object using BDC and Role creation Using the BAPI
"" Creation of Authorization Object
CALL FUNCTION 'ZAUTHOBJ'
        EXPORTING
         ctu                    = 'X'
         mode                   = p_mode
         UPDATE                 = 'L'
*   GROUP                  =
*   USER                   =
*   KEEP                   =
*   HOLDDATE               =
         nodata                 = '/'
         g_authname_001         = 'ZDUMMY_MIS'
          g_targetauth_002       = wa_tab-auth
          g_authtxt_003          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_004        = wa_tab-med_desc
         marked_04_005          = 'X'
          g_authtxt_006          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_007        = wa_tab-med_desc
         tctiobjnm_04_008       = 'ZBUS_UNIT'
          g_authtxt_009          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_010        = wa_tab-med_desc
         marked_05_011          = ''
         opt_01_012             = 'EQ'
          low_01_013             = wa_tab-bu
          g_authtxt_014          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_015        = wa_tab-med_desc
         marked_04_016          = 'X'
          g_authtxt_017          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_018        = wa_tab-med_desc
         tctiobjnm_04_019       = 'ZCONTRCT'
          g_authtxt_020          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_021        = wa_tab-med_desc
         marked_05_022          = ''
         opt_01_023             = 'EQ'
          low_01_024             = lv_contract
          g_authtxt_025          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_026        = wa_tab-med_desc
          g_authtxt_027          = wa_tab-short_desc
          g_authtxtmd_028        = wa_tab-med_desc
          g_authname_029         = wa_tab-auth
* IMPORTING
*   SUBRC                  =
       TABLES
         messtab                = temp_message.
"" Creation of role
LOOP AT it_role INTO wa_role.
      CLEAR wa_text.
      wa_text-text = wa_role-desc.
      wa_text-langu = 'E'.
      APPEND wa_text TO it_text.
      wa_jobrole-agr_name = wa_role-role_name.
      wa_parentrole-agr_name = 'ZM_CT_DUMMY_MIS'.
      wa_method-usmethod = 'CHANGE'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'ZBAPI_JOBROLE_CLONE'
        EXPORTING
          jobrole          = wa_jobrole
         parent           = wa_parentrole
         method           = wa_method
       TABLES
*   RETURN           =
         shorttext     = it_text
*   LONGTEXT         =
*   MENU_NODES       =
*   MENU_TEXTS       =.
    ENDLOOP.
2) ZMIS_AUTH_ASSIGN_TO_ROLE - This program will generate the profile created assign it to the role.
""*BDC for Profile creation and assignment to Roles
    CALL FUNCTION 'ZROLE'
      EXPORTING
       ctu                     = 'X'
       mode                    = p_mode
       UPDATE                  = 'L'
*   GROUP                   =
*   USER                    =
*   KEEP                    =
*   HOLDDATE                =
       nodata                  = '/'
        agr_name_neu_001        = wa_role-role_name
        text_002                = wa_role-desc
        text_003                = wa_role-desc
        text_004                = wa_role-desc
       value_01_005            = 'T-ML330881'
        h_fval_low_01_006       = wa_role-auth
        profn_007               = lv_profile
        ptext_008               = lv_text1
* IMPORTING
*   SUBRC                   =
     TABLES
       messtab                 = temp_message .
   COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
""*Generation of Profile created
LOOP AT it_role INTO wa_role.
    CALL FUNCTION 'PRGN_AUTO_GENERATE_PROFILE_NEW'
     EXPORTING
       activity_group                      = wa_role-role_name
*     PROFILE_NAME                        =
*     PROFILE_TEXT                        =
      no_dialog                           = ' '
      rebuild_auth_data                   = ''
      org_levels_with_star                = ' '
      fill_empty_fields_with_star         = 'X'
      template                            = ' '
      check_profgen_tables                = 'X'
      generate_profile                    = 'X'
      authority_check_pfcg                = 'X'
   EXCEPTIONS
     activity_group_does_not_exist       = 1
     activity_group_enqueued             = 2
     profile_name_exists                 = 3
     profile_not_in_namespace            = 4
     no_auth_for_prof_creation           = 5
     no_auth_for_role_change             = 6
     no_auth_for_auth_maint              = 7
     no_auth_for_gen                     = 8
     no_auths                            = 9
     open_auths                          = 10
     too_many_auths                      = 11
     profgen_tables_not_updated          = 12
     error_when_generating_profile       = 13
     OTHERS                              = 14
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
      MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
              WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
For creating authorization objects, role & profile i have created one dummy auth, dummy role & dummy profile respectively.
i have created dummy objects to copy the roles from dummy object and assign the same to new Auth obj, role & profile.
Let me know what needs to be done. because these both the programs run perfectly in foreground, but fails in background.
Regards,
Chetan

Role assignment not working

Hi everyone,
I am trying to assign different roles to different users for GRC - Risk Management 10.0; however it seems like standard roles don't have any affect on type of activity. I have maintained various levels of roles (e.g. risk owner, risk expert, risk manager, etc) using PFCG and assigned almost every role to the users; but it doesn't give them the authorization to create or edit anything, they can only display.
The only workaround for this was assigning a role with the authorization object GRFN_USER (with 02 Change value enabled) or assigning SAP_GRC_FN_ALL (Power user role which also contains object GRFN_USER). However this would allow users to do "anything" they want which obviously isn't what I seek.
I have tried changing customization options such as Maintain Custom Agent Determination Rules and Maintain Entity Role Assignment, it hasn't solved anything so far.
I urgently require your assistance on this issue. Thank you.
Regards,
Seckin

Hi,
I 'm facing same kind of problem.
Case 1:
I tried with:
                  Assigning users to group (abap role) which didn't worked.
                  Assigning UME Role to group (abap role) which worked. Then i assigned the user to the UME Role, but the user is not getting the backend authorizations.
                  Assigning the portal role to the group (abap role), then when i assiged a user to the abap role from R/3 automatically the user is getting the portal role.
How can i do the same from portal?
Case2:
While distributing the portal roles to the ABAP system (System Administrator -> Permissions -> SAP Authorizations), the status is showing as "Role transfer compleated". but when i checked from the R/3 transaction WP3R, there are no portal roles.
Why are the portal roles not getting transfered even though the status is green?
Mr.Chowdary

OBPM 10gR3 Dynamic Role Assignment at user login

Hi,
For all the great integration with LDAP in 10gR3, unfortunately, the system is unable to deal with dynamically-defined LDAP groups.
Our goal is to apply a BPM Role to ALL humans defined in our LDAP.
All humans happen to already be defined by a dynamically-defined LDAP group called 'AllPeople'.
It would have been perfect if we could simply assign our BPM Role, 'Employee', to the LDAP group, 'AllPeople'. Sadly you can't (one for the next release pls).
So as a workaround, what we want to do instead is assign the BPM Role 'Employee' to each individual user dynamically when they first login.
Since the FDI library is useless outside of a BPM context (you'll find that some of the familiar methods of RoleAssignment are missing), We opted to create an actual BPM process to conduct role assignments, and we would then trigger it via PAPI.
The question then was, where/when do we invoke the process such that it does the role assignment quickly and soon enough for the appropriate views and applications to appear in their workspace straight after login?
We opted for a customised implementation of the SSOWorkspaceLoginInterface class.
However, we tried making the invocation in the setupAuthenticatedSession() and the processRequest() methods but, although the role assignment was successfully done in either case, sadly the user's session was loaded without the new changes - perhaps loaded quicker than the role assignment could be fed back through the directory.
Therefore, we dumped the invocation in the actual constuctor - and this seems to work for the most part. Yet on the odd ocassion, the role assignment is not quick enough to be realised in the user's workspace session - the user has to logout and back in before the changes are realised.
We've even tried to get the execution to sleep for a second or two, while the PAPI thread goes about doing the role assignment - again not much success.
So I really have 2 questions:
1. Where during login can we make a PAPI call to do a role assignment so that it should be picked up by the time the session is created? perhaps we already are doing it in the right place.
2. How could we refresh/request a new session cookie without explicitly logging out and back in again? Note, page refresh is not enough.
Thanks for reading.

Sorry for the belated response - I don't get notified of replies.
The code for my custom SSOLoginModule class is:-
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Properties;
import fuego.workspace.security.SSOWorkspaceLoginInterface;
import fuego.papi.Arguments;
import fuego.papi.CommunicationException;
import fuego.papi.InstanceInfo;
import fuego.papi.OperationException;
import fuego.papi.ProcessService;
import fuego.papi.ProcessServiceSession;
import fuego.sso.SSOLoginException;
import fuego.sso.SSOUserLogin;
import fuego.jsfcomponents.Util;
import fuego.workspace.model.common.WorkspaceApplicationBean;
public class CustomSSOWorkspaceLogin extends SSOUserLogin implements SSOWorkspaceLoginInterface {
private ProcessService pService;
private ProcessServiceSession pServiceSession;
private Properties properties;
public SSOWorkspaceDBLogin() {
//Do the role assignment here because it works, and does not work in the ideal location of setupAuthenticatedSession method
pService = createProcessService();
pServiceSession = createProcessServiceSession();
assignDefaultRole(Util.getHttpServletRequest().getRemoteUser());
private ProcessService createProcessService() {
return WorkspaceApplicationBean.getCurrent().getProcessService();
private ProcessServiceSession createProcessServiceSession() {
return pService.createSession("yourdirectoryusername","yourdirectorypassword",null);
//This method is used to remotely invoke a BPM process to do the role assignment - no external API to do this directly!
private void assignDefaultRole(String email) {
try {
String processId = "myRoleAssignmentProcessId";
String argumentName = "argumentName"; //the name of the input argument to feed in the participant
String argumentValue = email;
Arguments arguments = Arguments.create();
arguments.putArgument(argumentName, argumentValue);
InstanceInfo instance = pServiceSession.processCreateInstance(processId, arguments);
Long waitTime = new Long(1000);
Long timeLimit = new Long(5000);
boolean roleAssigned = false;
boolean timeLimitExceeded = false;
Long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
//Allow role assignment thread to complete
while (!roleAssigned && !timeLimitExceeded) {
try {
Thread.sleep(waitTime);
if (pServiceSession.processGetInstance(instance.getId()).isCompleted()) {
roleAssigned = true;
if (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime > timeLimit) {
timeLimitExceeded = true;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
//close process service session
pServiceSession.close();
//Do not close the service itself as it is shared with the Workspace itself!
//pService.close();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
public void setupAuthenticatedSession(HttpServletRequest httpservletrequest, HttpServletResponse httpservletresponse) throws SSOLoginException {
//Unfortunately, the below does not work here because the role assignment is not fast enough
//The result is that the user logs in but cannot see any applications because the role assignment has not been made in time.
//Therefore, we run the below statements from the constructor - ugly but functions.
//pService = createProcessService();
//pServiceSession = createProcessServiceSession();
//assignDefaultRole(httpservletrequest.getRemoteUser());
public void processRequest(HttpServletRequest httpservletrequest, HttpServletResponse httpservletresponse) throws SSOLoginException {
}

Layout and role assignment

Hi,
one question regarding layouts. When you create a new layout you have to assign it to the roles, for which the new layout should be visible. And I have seen for parametric roles you have to/can choose the parametric value as well. But I would like to assign it to a complete parametric role, not just some values of it. Is there an easier way than just assign it to all values? Especially since the values for my parametric role will change quite frequently, it would be a little bit annoying.
Regards
Matthias

Hi,
one question regarding layouts. When you create a new layout you have to assign it to the roles, for which the new layout should be visible. And I have seen for parametric roles you have to/can choose the parametric value as well. But I would like to assign it to a complete parametric role, not just some values of it. Is there an easier way than just assign it to all values? Especially since the values for my parametric role will change quite frequently, it would be a little bit annoying.
Regards
Matthias

Indirect Role Assignment

I am adding roles to positions using indirect role assignment, when adding the role to the position I am prompted to carry out a reconcilliation of indirect user assignments, receive message 'Indirect user assignments ok' so then I've run PFUD. When I check both the role and the user I cannot see the role attached to the user, but the role is listed in the 'Relationships' in PP01.
A new organisation structure has been created, when I click on the drop down at the 'change agent assignment' the old organisation structure is displayed. Any suggestions please how I can select the new organisation structure?
Thanks

Hello Anthea,
to pass on a role from a position to a SAP user id I would suggest the following.
Go to transaction SA38 and run report RHPROFL0.
Some notes on the report and report selections.
The report can be used to eveluate and assign roles from HR objects to SAP users. The report starts reading at a given HR object along an evaluation path. It then updates the SAP user found with authorisation roles.
Selections:
You have assigned the roles to a position therefore you should select object type S.
Then put the position number in the Object ID.
The key date is hopefully self explaining.
The evaluation path might have defaulted to PROFL0. That would be the correct one.
The program has a test mode. I suggest you run the test mode first. It will tell you what the program would change in an actual run.
In the next selection box - "Generate authorization profiles"
You might leave the ticks in the boxes:
- Standard authorizations
- PD authorizations
That will generate profiles if they aren't generated yet.
Next selection box - "Delete manually maintained authorisation profiles"
Leave the tick boxes blank if you have any direct assigned roles.
If you tick the boxes all roles and profiles directly assigned to SAP user ids will be deleted.
In section "New Users"
There is a tick box "Generate".
If that box is ticked the report will create new SAP user IDs for all occupied positions with roles but without SAP user ID on the Employee record.
You might leave that box unticked for the moment.
I suggest to create the application log --> Last tick box on the selection screen.
Some general comments at the end.
The report RHPROFL0 might be scheduled in production systems if indirect role assignments are used. Depending on your needs make sure that the deletion of manual assigned profiles is activated or deactivated.
If you do not enter an object id, the report will run for all object ids.
A further note on the indirect setup.
If roles should be passed on from a Position to a SAP user id, it is important, that the following conditions are fulfilled.
The Position is valid/active as of the report key date.
The position has a holder at key date.
The holder has an assignment of a valid SAP user ID at key date. Infotype 0105 subtype 0001 for object type P.
The Roles on the position are valid at the key date.
I hope that helps solving your issue.
Best regards
Karsten

CUA sync with child client issue for indirect role assignment.

Hello Security experts,
we have a indirect role assignment set up in our ECC environment. there is a syncronization issue from the parent CUA to the chlild client. The role assignments have been made to role although they are not always reaching target system without having to sync up either the role or the IDu2019s position # manually. This has been an ongoing issue CUA has on any role or user from time to time. any hint on fixing this issue. please help..

Whole idea of CUA is to manage your roles and users centrally, on the contrary you can manage the roles/profiles by setting up the attributes for the CUA thorugh Central user Management console - SCUM Transaction.
CUA has its own pros -
Central rep,Users Sync,Role Provisioning statergy - Global composites(consists of individual child roles) Distibuted model -Provisioing at individual child systems for roles, etc.Central user store,easy maintenance.
on the contrary - change documents is always a concern ( because cua uses - interface Ids or the RFC ids to push the idocs from cua to child system), CUA maintenance while system refresh - Copied distribution models have to be deleted and re-created, system backups has to be defined per you distribution model, password maintenance if defined global then Child systems act as inactive nodes, reading the roles into cua which are created in childs so as to establish a pointer to that system.
It also depends on the number of systems you have in your landscape so that you can calculate the overhead and then have a Go -no-Go decison on CUA.
Overall, I consider CUA as a good approach provided we streamline the process of provisioning, de-provisioning per the cua standards.
Rakesh

Fix Business Role / Technical Role assignment in Pending or Failed status

Hi,
We are facing issues with few users where Business role assignment or technical role assignment is going into Pending or failed status.
None of the jobs are failing or throwing any error related with the changes.
We are running IdM 7.2 version with SP8.
Is there a way to fix this issue other than removing and reassigning or recreating ID.
Regards,
Manish

Hi Manish,
If technical role (priv) in failed status, please check Tero's reply in the below post. You can set a periodic job to read users and privs in failed status and use uRetryPrivilegeAdd() function to retry the assignment.
Failed AD privileges
I was able to find a document on how to set up the periodic job.
Retry failed assignments (Privilege)
You should try searching the forum and wiki for answers. Most of the issues are addressed by our community experts already. Thanks.
Kind regards,
Jai
Message was edited by: Jai Suryan

What is the role of Changing Tab infunction module se37

Hi. All,
Any body can help me that what is the role of changing tab in function module.
i am very confuse to take this. please tell me with code ( code implementation)
not only theritical.
Regards
Mohd
Moderator message: please search for information, these forums are no substitute for ABAP training.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 1, 2012

SAP help portal
ht[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/2d/351ee6448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/2d/351ee6448c11d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Configuration for definition of formula parameter
Customizing > Quality Management > Quality Inspection > Results Recording > Define Parameters for Calculated Characteristics
As you know, you can assign the formula for inspection characteristic in inspection plan.
Regards
Luke

Business role assignment get lost

Hello *,
from time to time single users report logon problems due to missing business role assignment.
In these cases business role was assigned via user in tx su01 directly. Whenever it happened the affected user itself is shown for last modifier of user record. But the users of course are not authorized to edit this data.
We assume that maybe the personalization in web ui could be the reason but up to know the behaviour was not reproduceable.
Does anyone know this issue?
Kind regards
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
Sorry but maybe I've explained myself poorly. You said that business roles that were missing are normally assigned directly in SU01. Then, in order to try to understand how they are remove, in SU01 transaction there is a functionality that allows you to see the change history for every add/removal of a role. This will tell you the user that performed the action and which tcode he used.
Check this functionality that it's available as a menu option in SU01. Maybe it can give you some good clues about what's happening.
Kind regards,
Garcia

Role Assignment Migration Issue

Hi All,
We migrated from EP6.0 to NW04 and encountered an issue with role assignment. We currently have two LDAPs (1 for external customers and 1 for internal customers), when we did the migration, what we noticed is that for the external users, all their roles were not attached and for internal users, some of the roles were not attached. Has anyone encountered this issue?
Thanks

Hi Reyna,
I did some research on this. I was unable to find anyone who migrated from a portal with two ldaps configured. I was aware of some issues if people changed ldaps or migrated the uses from one ldap to another. Or if they didn't use the migration tools. Since you used the tools and used the same ldap, I'm not sure what is going on.
If you haven't already, I suggest you open a message with SAP. Let us know here if you make any progress. If I find out more, I'll post here too.
Thanks,
John

Role Assignment changes Duration

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for