Rolling In-Place Hold & Archive Mailbox Interaction

Hello,
I've been looking at replacing existing Journaling with a combination of Exchange 2013 In-Place Hold and Archive Mailboxes, however I have a theoretical situation I've been having trouble mapping the behaviour for from the documentation available.
My theoretical configuration would be a Time Based In-Place Hold for all mailboxes for a 7 year period, with Archive Mailboxes for all users with a Retention Policy that moved all messages to the Archive Mailbox after 1 year (note; no Retention Policy to
force deletion of messages after 7 years).
In this situation I believe that a message the user reads and takes no further action on would follow the below flow:
day0: message delivered to inbox
day365: message moved to Archive Mailbox
day2555: message available for deletion
I am however unsure of the behaviour of messages the user has deleted within the first year which are in the Recoverable Items Folder at the point they should be moved to the Archive Mailbox, I would hope for the below flow:
day0: message delivered to inbox
day8: user deletes message (moved to Recoverable Items Folder on Primary Mailbox Database)
day365: message moved to Archive Mailbox (Recoverable Items Folder on Archive Database)
day2555: message purged from Recoverable Items Folder
However my concern would be based on the description of In-Place hold that all messages deleted would actually continue to be retained in the Recoverable Items Folder on the primary mailbox database and thus end up causing issues with around the Recoverable
Items Quota for the database.
I would be grateful if someone could help me straighten out the logic in this theoretical situation and help me identify if this general idea is a workable replacement for Journaling.
Many Thanks

Hello,
For recoverable items folder, we can set retemtion policy tag with action "move to achive". See more detail in the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd297955(v=exchg.150).aspx.
Meanwhile, In-Place Hold allows the search and preservation of messages matching query parameters. Messages are protected from deletion, modification, and tampering and can be preserved indefinitely or for a specified period. See more details in the
following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff637980(v=exchg.150).aspx
Journaling can also help organizations respond to legal, regulatory and organizational compliance requirements by recording inbound and outbound e-mail communications. See more details in the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998649(v=exchg.150).aspx
In my opinion, we can use In-place hold in place of Journaling to preserve the deleted messages.
if there's any question, feel free to let us know.
Sent By
Silver

Similar Messages

  • In-place archive and in-place hold

    Hello,
    I have a question concerning the archiving of the Recoverable items folder.
    The question refers to Exchange 2013 SP1 and in-place archive in coherency with in-place hold.
    First of all I have an active in-place archive with the default retention policy.
    Futhermore a Time-based In-Place Hold is enabled.
    So if I hard delete a item its moves to the DiscoveryHolds folder, by reason of the in-place hold.
    As the "DiscoveryHolds" Folder is a subfolder of the "recoverable items", will the hard-deleted email be moved to the users in-place archive according to the Retentiontag of the "recoverable items" folder?
    If not, is there any possibility to ensure that hard-deleted items which are being kept in the database by in-place hold are being moved to the archive? We want to assure that items, which are being deleted by the user, do not remain in the
    users active mailbox, but are being moved to the archive mailbox DiscoveryHolds folder to keep the active mailbox database "tidy".
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    If set a retention policy for recoverable items folder, then the In-Place Hold will not prevent the items being moved from the primary mailbox's recoverable items folder to archive mailbox's.
    Here is a related thread for your reference.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/635c9357-d0f1-4de6-b8f4-5f78867d2f19/rolling-inplace-hold-archive-mailbox-interaction?forum=exchangesvradmin
    More information for your reference.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/ee364755(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2013 In Place Hold with In Place Archiving

    I'd like to use in place hold to ensure all data is kept for 5 years rolling but still use in place archiving for all data over 1 year old.
    Is this possible without all data between 1 and 5 years old being held both in the recoverable items folder of the primary mailbox as well as in the archive mailbox?

    Hi,
    Based on your description, you want to use In-Place Hold to keep data for 5 years and use retention policy to move messages older than 1 year to archive mailbox.
    If you have mails older than 1 year, then they will be moved to archive mailbox and In-Place Hold will not prevent the items being moved from the primary mailbox to archive mailbox. These won't go to the recoverable items folder in the primary mailbox.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • In-Place Hold Combined with In-Place Archiving in Exchange 2013

    Hi,
    In-Place Hold is enabled for a mailbox and set to keep everything indefinitely.  The same mailbox has a Retention Policy with a Default Policy Tag set to move everything to an archive mailbox after 2 years.
    Let's say the user keeps mail in the primary mailbox and 2 years passes.  This piece of mail should then be moved to the archive mailbox.  When this happens, does the indefinite In-Place Hold mean that the mail is ALSO kept in the primary mailbox
    (in the Recoverable Items Folder)?
    Or is the In-Place Hold smart enough to consider both the primary and archive mailbox as a single "whole" and would therefore completely purge the mail from the primary mailbox when it is moved to the archive?
    Obviously I would expect if the user were to subsequently delete the mail from the archive mailbox that In-Place Hold would actually keep the mail in the Recoverable Items Folder in the archive mailbox.
    I am essentially trying to determine if In-Place Hold effectively nullifies any space saving in the primary mailbox when mail is archived or whether the two mailboxes are treated as a single "whole" for the purpose of the hold.
    Cheers,
    David

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply.  If that is the case, doesn't that effectively mean that when In-Place Hold is active, any In-Place Archive process actually ends up creating a second copy of the mail and therefore using twice as much space?
    One copy in the Archive mailbox and one copy kept in the Recoverable Items Folder (due to the In-Place Hold) in the Primary mailbox.
    My feeling is that Microsoft would have been smart enough to get this right and Exchange will actually bypass the In-Place Hold functionality in the specific case when the mail is being moved to the Archive - but this is just a guess.  I'd like to know
    for sure.
    Cheers,
    David

  • Script Powershell In Place Hold Mailbox with Exchange 2010

    Hello, 
    I have a script that allows me to make a InPlaceHold newly created mailboxes via Exchange 2010.
    But every time I run, he released me an error message: See attached picture.
    Here is the script in question:
    #Initialize variables
    $policyname = "In Place - Hold"
    $members = Import-CSV "C:\migration\Script\New_User\New_User_List.csv" -delimiter ";"
    $Result = "C:\migration\Script\New_User\New_User_Result.log"
    $powerUser = "******"
    $powerPass = "******"
    $password = ConvertTo-SecureString $powerPass -AsPlainText -Force
    $adminCredential = New-Object -TypeName System.Management.Automation.PSCredential -argumentlist $powerUser,$password
    $Session = New-PSSession -ConfigurationName Microsoft.Exchange -ConnectionUri https://outlook.office365.com/powershell-liveid/ -Credential $adminCredential -Authentication Basic -AllowRedirection
    Import-PSSession $Session
    #Get current mailboxes in our mailbox search
    $InPlaceHoldMailboxes = (Get-MailboxSearch $policyname).sourceMailboxes
    #Add another user to the array, the line bellow can be a loop of more than one user.
    foreach ( $member in $members)
    if ($InPlaceHoldMailboxes -contains($member.name))
    Write-Host $("User " + $member.name + " already present") -ForegroundColor:yellow
    Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - WARNING, User " + $member.name + " already present in members") -Encoding UTF8 -append
    else
    $InPlaceHoldMailboxes += $member.upn
    Write-Host $("User " + $member.name + " added") -ForegroundColor:green
    Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - SUCCESS, User " + $member.name + " added to members") -Encoding UTF8 -append
    #Add them to the MailboxSearch
    Try
    Set-MailboxSearch $policyname -SourceMailboxes $InPlaceHoldMailboxes -Force -ErrorAction 'Stop'
    Write-Host $("SUCCESS, " + $policyname + " updated") -ForegroundColor:green
    Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - SUCCESS, " + $policyname + " updated") -Encoding UTF8 -append
    Catch
    Write-Host $("ERROR, policie " + $policyname + " NOT updated") -ForegroundColor:red
    Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - ERROR, " + $policyname + " NOT updated") -Encoding UTF8 -append
    Write-Error $_.Exception.ToString() > $Result
    Exit
    #start the mailboxsearch
    Start-MailboxSearch -Identity $policyname -Force
    Remove-PSSession $Session
    I use Powershell 4.0
    Thank you for your help.

    Please read the error message carefully as it tells you what is wrong. "You cannot update multiple mailboxes".  You must do one at a time.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Powershell-Putting user mailbox to E-Discovery and in-place hold

    Our org using office 365 and exchange on premise server, i asked to automate account termination. Per process each account is already enabled for litigation hold. During exit we have to put this mailbox to e-discovery and in place-hold. I tried PowerShell
    command and failed to execute, Can you please provide PowerShell script to execute user "test.india".
    When helpdesk supplies user name, PowerShell command starts and put this user in e-discovery with 2555 days retentions period. Please help as am new to PowerShell.
    Thanks
    TechRoute

    "failed to execute" is a little vague. Was there an error message? 
    One common mistake which I made when setting this up for myself is that you have to specify a target mailbox. 
    New-MailboxSearch <employeeName> -SourceMailboxes <employeemailbox> -TargetMailbox "Discovery Search Mailbox"
    Start-MailboxSearch <employeeName>
    Works for me.

  • Set the default size for all archive mailboxes including the ones it will be created in the future

    Hi there.
    We are in the phase where we Will enable Online Archive for all the users.
    We see that the default Archiving Quota is set up for 50 GB. We have found this powershell command on MsTechnet forum
    Get-Mailbox -resultsize unlimited | where {$_.ArchiveDatabase -ne $null} | set-mailbox -ArchiveQuota 7GB -ArchiveWarningQuota 6GB
    which I guess it will set up the ArchiveQuota to 7GB to all the users, true?
    The question is if this command will work only for those users who currently have archiving enabled or it Will also work for those users which we are planing to enable archiving in the future?
    The idea is that everyone would not have 50GB by default and this should be a default value also for those who currently do not have archiving enabled.
    with best regards,
    bostjanc

    Hi there.
    I don't quite get it.
    I have created "for example" a database called: STH ARCHIVE.
    Then if I take look on properties of this database this is how it's shown:
    And now here comes the "tricky part" which is a little bit odd to me.
    I have enabled archive on my mailbox and selected this STH ARCHIVE DB to hold this archive mailbox.
    Then I have manually ran ManagedFolderAssistant for my account: Start-ManagedFolderAssistant -Identity "my-email-address"
    And after I have greped the size of my mailbox:
    Get-Mailbox | Get-MailboxStatistics -Archive | Sort totalitemsize -desc | ft displayname,totalitemsize, itemcount >C:\report-archive-database-mailboxes.txt
    And get the result:
    Personal Archive - MYUSERNAME
    TotalItemSize: 4.071 GB (4,371,586,689 bytes)  
    ItemCount: 55227
    So now I don't understand how I was able to go thru that sizes which are in the upper print screen of archive DB properties?
    bostjanc

  • Need a script to enable in-place hold on Office 365

    Hello, I need a script to enable in-place hold on Office 365 for my users.
    The options that I have found for this so far is to enable in-place hold for a DL or an individual user. Is there a way to use a CSV instead?
    This is what I have used before.....where "allstaff" is the name of a DL.
    New-MailboxSearch -name "3 Year In-Place Hold" -SourceMailboxes allstaff -InPlaceHoldEnabled $true -ItemHoldPeriod 1095

    That doesn't seem to work.........I think it's trying to create a new hold query for every user.
    PS C:\scripts> ./user_hold.ps1
    WARNING: The hold setting may take up to 60 minutes to take effect.
    Name                CreatedBy           InPlaceHoldEnabled  Status
    3 Year In-Place ... S-1-5-21-2495351... True                NotStarted
    Unable to execute the task. Reason: A mailbox search named <3 Year In-Place Hol
    d> already exists or is currently being deleted. Please choose a different name
        + CategoryInfo          : InvalidArgument: (Microsoft.Excha...DiscoverySea
       rch:MailboxDiscoverySearch) [], MailboxSearchTaskException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : [Server=BLUPR06MB097,RequestId=e8df9b95-2e00-428
       d-813f-da05ea8d09d4,TimeStamp=11/5/2013 9:38:05 PM] [FailureCategory=Cmdle
      t-MailboxSearchTaskException] 95CD9ECA
    So my next question...........how do I add users to an existing In-Place hold?

  • Exchange 2013 Archive mailbox best practise

    Current senario:
    Migrating to Exchange 2013 CU3 from lotus Domino
    in lotus domino the customer is having huge archive files(nfs file size is around 30 GB, like wise users are having multiple archive file with same size.)
    Requirement is all these file need to migrated to exchange 2013 CU3. whcih we are taking care by using thrid party tool.
    My concern is exchang e2013 support for huge mailbox size. if so what maximum size supported for online mailbox and archive mailbox.
    can I assign multiple archive mailbox to users.
    we have got separate Exchange 2013 archive server in place
    We would like know the best practise/guide line for archive mailbox/live mailbox size.
    refered below link:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ashwinexchange/archive/2012/12/16/major-changes-with-exchange-server-2013-part-1.aspx

    The key decision is that the content in the primary mailbox is synchronized with the client when in cached mode, while the content in the archive is not.  So I'd want to keep the primary mailbox populated with the content the user needs on a daily basis,
    and put the rest in the archive.  Unfortunately, that answer is not a number, and it isn't the same for all users.
    Each user can have zero or one archive mailboxes, not multiple.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Compliance Management - In Place hold checkbox

    Hello,
    I have a general functionality question.   for the Place content matching the search query in selected mailboxes on hold check box I noticed that it drives the Yes / No hold status in the EAC.   If this checkbox
    is NOT selected and the Hold status lists as "NO" does that mean the email box technically is not on litigation hold status?
    If that is the case, why would you create an in place hold WITHOUT actually placing it on hold?
    Thanks in advance....

    Thanks Andy   - this is making more sense now.   So it sounds like I can also do the reverse...put a mailbox on litigation hold when needed...and if I need to suddenly pull out granular information from that mailbox, create the in place
    hold to search and pull out messages... is that correct?
    Yes, you can do both. In your scenario however, since the mailbox is already on litigation hold, you would simply need to do an ediscovery search of the mailbox and dump the results to the Discovery Mailbox.
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Migration from 2007 and Archive Mailbox PST import question

    Our enterprise will be migrating from Exchange 2007 SP3 to Exchange 2013 CU3 very shortly. Exchange 2013 is set up and I am in coexistance mode currently. Everything is working fine with the legacy redirection, I have tested some mailbox migrations and they
    work fine. We currently use Mimosa Nearpoint as a third party email archive product.
    As part of this migration from 2007 to 2013, we plan on moving away from Mimosa Nearpoint and utilizing the Exchange 2013 Archive Mailbox feature. We will give each user an Archive Mailbox. We have the ability to export the users existing archive out of
    NearPoint to .PST files and then migrating them directly into the users Archive Mailbox using the "New-MailboxImportRequest -IsArchive" powershell commandlet. This has been tested and works fine with one very important exception.
    When I export from Nearpoint, I have to export the entire contents of the archive, I cannot set date ranges. So when I do an export, it also contains the contents of the user's mailbox. I have managed folder policies in place in the Exchange 2007 environment
    which delete all contents of the mailbox older than 60 days, but when I import the .PST to the archive, it imports ALL items into the Archive Mailbox. So I have 60 days worth duplication of items.
    It is my understanding that if I imported the Archive .PST directly into the users production mailbox in the 2013 side, that it would not import duplicate items. I am trying to find out if there is any process which will do the same thing with me importing
    directly into the users Archive Mailbox.
    Thanks you,

    Hi,
    We used a third patry email archive product to export to .pst files, so it is too hard to say that whether it cause this issue.
    However, I found a method to delete the duplicate items from our mailbox via MFCMAPI Tool.
    Please make sure that the Exchange Server mailbox has been backed up first.
    Details in the following KB:
    How to remove duplicate folders in Outlook when connected to an Exchange Server mailbox
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2509983
    I also found a script to remove duplicate items.
    This script will scan each folder of a given mailbox and removes duplicate items from those folders. You can specify how the items should be deleted and what items to process, e.g. mail items or appointments. Sample usage is after a misbehaving synchronization
    tool creates duplicate items or (accidental) import of PST file with duplicate items.
    *****Please also make a full back up first*****
    Removing Duplicate Items from a Mailbox
    http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Removing-Duplicate-Items-f706e1cc#content
    Disclaimer       
    The sample scripts are not supported under any Microsoft standard support program or service.
    The sample scripts are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. Microsoft further disclaims all implied warranties including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or of fitness for a particular purpose.
    The entire risk arising out of the use or performance of the sample scripts and documentation remains with you.
    In no event shall Microsoft, its authors, or anyone else involved in the creation, production, or delivery of the scripts be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of business profits, business interruption, loss
    of business information, or other pecuniary loss) arising out of the use of or inability to use the sample scripts or documentation, even if Microsoft has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
    Hope it is helpful
    Thanks
    Mavis
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • OS X Mail not showing Archive mailbox (and lost Flagged mailbox)

    Recently I notice the Archive mailbox in Apple Mail has dissappeared. I can find messages in that mailbox using Searchlight if I know the exact contents of the message or subject but I use this mailbox to store application licenses, etc., and do not always know the right subject. I used to browse, knowing roughly the time when I bought the licese. Also the Flagged mailbox is grayed out in the favorites line and not shown in the left hand mailbox side bar.Also a pain because I set reminder messages and conference call emails with colored flags.
    Any help?

    Next to the On My Mac there is a hide function. Did you select it? If you go to the same place, see if there is a Show function.

  • Question about Archiving Mailboxes

    I keep almost all of my mail On My Mac > Personal Mail, then divided into subfolders beneath that.  I back up to Time Machine.
    This morning I noticed one of those sub folders was missing, and had to go back more than 24 hours to recover it.  Not sure how it went missing, but it did.
    I am wondering what is the diffference between using Archive Mailbox under the Mailbox menu and keeping the messages in folders On My Mac?
    I think my mailboxes are just getting too darn big, try as I might to contain them.  I'm a mail hoarder.
    Thanks for any insight

    How you backup and what you backup to is all about taking a calculated risk. In other words, what's it worth to you?
    Ultimately, whatever method you choose, I think redundancy is the most important factor. It doesn't matter if you have half-a-dozen backups, if they're all in the same place and the building burns down, they're all gone.
    Yes, hard drives are flimsy and fail, but you can easily duplicate a backup and store them in separate locations; then, make regular maintenance checks to see if they're viable. The probability of two backups failing simultaneously is astronomically low; the probability of one backup failing is astronomically high. For the average person, most dedicated backup systems are too far out of reach, pricewise and from an infrastructure standpoint. Duplicating hard drives is pretty crude, but it's cheap so long as you exercise due diligence.

  • After Migration using -ArchiveOnly, On Prem Outlook 2010 showing duplicate of primary as the archive mailbox

    We are testing the hybrid migration to Office 365:
    Federation and DirSync in place and working -- Exchange 2010 SP3 RU5 -- Outlook 2010 SP2 (14.0.7116.5000)
    I have a Primary Mailbox and an Archive Mailbox -- I moved the Archive to Office 365.
    I got the familiar "Your Admin has made a change ... You must restart Outlook ..."
    Afterwards I get my primary mailbox "Inbox - <email address>" and  "Archive <email address>" for the Archive mailbox, but the content is the Primary Mailbox
    I have two copies of the Primary mailbox and No archive.
    I create a new session to onmicrosoft.com then, "get-mailboxfolderstatisitcs -Identity
    '[email protected]' -Archive | ft Identity, ItemsInFolder, FolderSize", I see names, counts, and sizes that are definitely my archive.
    No License on Office 365 is checked -- I assumed the migration of the Archive would take care of that.
    How do I get my Outlook client to see the Archive and not dup the Primary mailbox in its place?

    Hi,
    My issue is resolved after disabling of Outlook Anywhere on EX2007 servers.
    I have to install new certificate & root certificate into all the clients & issue was resolved.
    But my non-domain join clients like WinXp with SP3 with Office 2007/Office 2010 who connects from branches like Banglore, Hyderabad they are getting password prompt pop-up but its working fine for Win7 & Win8 clients.
    For password prompt issue i ran this command on EX2010 cas server but still no luck;
    Set-OutlookProvider EXPR -CertPrincipalName msstd:*.domain.com
    But I found the solution for this;
    by adding below 5 registry keys & uncheck of Proxy settings in Outlook settings resolved the password
    promt issue.
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\ExcludeSCPLookup = 1
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\ExcludeHttpRedirect = 1
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\ExcludeHttpsAutodiscoverDomain = 1
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\ExcludeHttpsRootDomain = 1
    HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\ExcludeSrvRecord = 1
    My existing Ex2007 server running in SCC cluster, now I want to break SCC cluster & now I want to decommission one node from SCC Ex2007 mailbox server &
    I want to use this node for my Ex2010 mailbox server to create the DAG.
    Can any one help me to break SCC & run SCC with one  Node only.
    NOTE : Here I am short falling for H/W, hence I decided to use one node from SCC & use it as Ex2010 mailbox server to create the DAG.
    Now
    i just moved 100 mailboxes only
    Is it possible to run SCC with only one till I migrate all my users to EX2010.
    Any help really appreciated
    Regards
    Anand S
    Thanks & Regards Anand Sunka MCSA+CCNA+MCTS

  • How do I create an Archive Mailbox for a pop3 account on an iPhone4?

    How do  create an Archive Mailbox for a pop3 email account on an iPhone4 running iOs6?

    You can use classifications but there is no auto feature to archive like that on web apps.
    In terms of the blog, Like I have said to everyone that has posted about blog preview images:
    http://www.prettypollution.com.au/business-catalyst-blog
    Just one example of an image at the start of the blog post rendering out, not hard at all.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mac Mini Running Slow in 10.9.1

    Hello, I am new to this so here goes nothing. My Mac Mini Early 2009 is running very slow with 10.9.1 and am not sure what to do, below is my info using EtreCheck, thank you in advance for the help. Hardware Information:           Mac mini (Early 200

  • Ipod won't go into Itunes

    The Ipod works and the itunes works. But when the itunes is plugged in a Do not Disconnect icon appears and nothing happens in Itunes. tried the reset, restart, and reinstall. The Ipod updater doesn't work(either freezes or says Ipod Service Error) s

  • Material invoice reversal through MR8M

    Hi Experts, User has processed MIRO for multiple POs and has passed subsequent debit for few, for which system is not allowing him to reverse the invoice through MR8M. Now he can't reverse the subsequent debit invoice, as they are already paid. Can w

  • Recommended online (offsite) backup service for Leopard?

    I have searched the Apple Discussions and have only seen mention of Mozy. Does anyone know of any other good online backups? I have an external HD backup but want an OFFsite backup as well. Thanks!

  • Deployment connection problems

    I attempting to deploy a java class from Jdeveloper 3.1.1.2 into an Oracle 8.1.6 server on Solaris. My Tnsnames entry works for sqlplus from the PC. I am geeting the following errors when I test the connection: scenario 1: Thin JDBC existing TNS name