RRP3 View

Hi,
Can any one please tell me what does the SAP APO APPLICATION field value of "0" signify.
This field can be seen in RRP3 view. "0" means INITIAL.
Thanks,
SS

Hi SS,
It's actually not simple to comment for 0.
I see that it's there for CIFed Sales Orders, deliveries, stock & for forecast generated from DP.
I can only make a guess that it's for categories which won't get created in APO as a result of SNP or PPDS.
Thanks - Pawan

Similar Messages

Forecast consumption situation not shown in Forecast tab-RRP3 View

Hi,
I have released Forecast(FA) from DP to SNP.I am able to see the forecasts in Product view Elements tab.But I am not able to see any Forecast consumption details and overview in Forecast tab of Product view.It is showing if i create forecast manually in RRP3 view itself.How to bring the forecast data in forecast tab of RRP3 view.
Thanks&Regards
Venkadesh

Hi Venkadesh,
This is a known issue and can be solved by SAP Note 743646 - Incorrect consumption situation in product view.
Using a report, you can adjust the consumption situation in the element view so that it is the same as the consumption situation in the forecasting view. To do this, call transaction SE38 and create the report Z_CSP_DELTA_FCST with the title "Check of the consumption situation"; Type: Executable program; Status: Test program; Application: Materials Management. Delete the first line "REPORT..." from the new report then use the cut and paste functions to add the program to the correction instructions.
Try this out and let me kow if this solves your purpose.
Many thanks,
Amit Sen

APO application 2 (PPDS) in RRP3 view

Folks
Does a receipt/ requirement element with Category group AU/AV which will have the APO application field ( last column in RRP3 view) entry as 2 (PPDS), be displayed in standard SNP pallning books ?
I had included these categories(AU/AV) in one of the existing category groups and assigned it to the one of the intended Planning area key figures and had observed that these receipt/ requirement element weren't visible in the SNP data view KF.
Any way to resolve this issue ?
Thanks

In RRP3, view I had checked that the R/3 Object type is P(Project Order) and Category is 'AU' and Category Type is '2' (Requirement) and both source and destination fields are populated. Requirement qty is 50
So now that the project order requirement (which is Reservation, in this case) exists in RRP3 view, what I am trying to accomplish is, to view this order reservation requirement in the SNP Planning book which I had created.As, standard 9ANSP94 planning area doesn't have any KF for reservation, I had created a new PA and had created a KF, with 000 semantics, to accomodate this order reservation requirement and further assigned this KF to this Category AU.
Now in the data view for this PA, I was expecting to see the Requirement qty of 50 but couldn't see it.
My question is as the Requirement already exists in the LC, shouldn't this be displayed in SNP planning books?
Hope I am clear and would appreciate if any one can rovide their insights and experiences on how to resolve this issue.
Thanks

Data available in RRP3 view but not coming in SNP planning book

Hi All,
I am facing an issue in SNP book. I can see forecasts in RRP3 view. But when I load the same data in SNP planning book, the forecasts are not coming there (forecast KF)
I ran LC Cons check, PA cons check, OM17, but still the same result.
Any pointer would be highly valuable.
Regards,
Manotosh Bhattacharya

Hi
If you look at the standard Forecast KF 9ADFCST in your planning area, it is usually assigned the Category Group of DF1. This category group only contains the category FA for forecast. If you create Forecast in /SAPAPO/RRP3, this will create Additional Forecast or category group FC. Therefore any forecast generated this way will not appear against the standard planning book KF.
So you have two choices, if your forecast is only FC category then use the KF 9AAFCST Forecast (Addittional) in your data view or create a new Category Group with both FA and FC assigned to it and then assign this Categotry Group to 9ADFCST in your planning area.
Regards
Ian

How to populate NON-SAP categories in product view?

Hi all,
I created a new category ZC.How to populate this category in RRP3 View?
regards
venkadesh

Hi
Check whether you have assigned the same category in Maintain Global parameters and defauls under the tab ATP Category
Make sure that it is relevant to Receipt or requirement elements
Check this
regards
Vijay

Past due PurRqs are getting deleted in APO but not getting deletd in R3

Hi folks,
We have a daily job, which runs at 18:00 hrs in the evening everyday in the APO Production System.The job is to delete all past due Purchase Requisitions for last 2 years (job & variant details are mentioned below) All the past due PurRqs are getting deleted from APO, which we have cross-cheked in RRP3 view many times.
However the same is not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end- user is getting confused & hassled by this list of old PurRqs which is visible in R3 through MD04 t-code.
Please suggest remedial/corrective actions to get this issue sorted.
The job details for the deletion of past purchase requisitions.
The job is run with the following variant details:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ABAP Program name :/SAPAPO/RLCDELETE
VARIANT Details
Select Object-> By Categories ->Category = AG (PurRqs in R3)
Manual Selection-> Version =000; Product = (blank); Location = List ofall locations;
Fixed Order (ticked)
Period = 14.03.2009 to 14.03.2011 {All PurRqs in these period shouldget deleted in APO as well as R3}
Settings-> Delete Transaction Data ->In R3 & APO (ticked)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Past due PurRqs are not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end-user is getting confused & hassled resulting in loss of productive time & generation of erroneous planning which is negatively impacting Business.
Pls suggest some remedy for this.
MMTIA
Kumar
Edited by: Blue Lotus on Mar 14, 2011 5:51 PM

Do you run the CCR on a daily basis. If so do you see the "reqs missing in R/3" in the CCR ?
Also what is your transfer setting ? Meaning the transfer from APO to R/3 configuration - is it immediate or change pointer based ? check that also
Thanks
Aparna

/SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 program is not working correctly if we run the program for range of material and plant wise

Hi APO Experts,
In our project, we have received more sales order inconsistencies which is not clearing by CCR program and it is clearing by program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 with option as Build Reqmts from Doc. Flow, So We have decided to schedule the background job on daily basis for program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 with option as Build Reqmts from Doc. Flow, performing the testing in our quality system and observed the below strange behavior.
When I am running the program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 with Range of products and some location range with option as Build Reqmts from Doc. Flow, in Background job. In output it is suggesting to delete one sales order. If I checked that Sales order in ECC, it is for an different location, that is not part of my selection and the order is open. In MD04 the Qty is showing 1 ( as per sales order) but in APO RRP3 view the order qty is showing Zero. I have run the CCR, it is coming in different in content and if I push, the different is not going to APO.
I have tried running the program /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 with plant which is mentioned in that sales order with option as Build Reqmts from Doc. Flow, in Background job , it is suggesting this sales order under update option correctly.
Can you please help me understand why it is behaving differently like the location is not part of my selection and why it is suggesting the wrong action. And also whether is it advisable to run the /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 with option as Build Reqmts from Doc. Flow at plant range and material range in background job.
Thanks & Regards,
Sundaram Radhakrishnan

Sundaram,
It sounds to me like the sales document records in the OLTP and in APO were created at different times. This is common in Dev and Qual environments when the systems are commonly created at two different times, and each was a copy of an existing system that contained sales data. The order number you see in //rrp3 is somewhat irrelevant; system generally uses the guid for many activities.
FYI during Dev and Qual refreshes, if you are copying from a production environment that contains data, it is always best to create the OLTP and SCM images at the same time, and to copy them both to the Dev and Qual systems at the same time. If you don't do this, you are faced with the additional tasks associated with getting the copied systems back into synch.
If this is Dev or Qual, I suggest that you just completely wipe out all sales orders in APO and rebuild them using the CIF.
If this is a mature production environment, the only time I have ever seen this issue is due to improperly created CIF enhancements. Speak to your developers to find the root cause, and correct this problem. Then, wipe out all sales orders and rebuild with CIF.
Best Regards,
DB49

What are theSNP Settings required for Forecast Consumption with Sales Order

Hello APO Folks,
I have one SNP scenario: (We don't have GATP)
Forecast for Finsihed Product - "PNG_Fert" in Location "1000".
I have forecast quantity of 500, now our requirement is - when SNP heuristic run will take place (without any sales order quantity) then there should not be any planned orders creation.
Planned order creation should happen Only if any one places sales order from ECC , which comes to APO then against that sales order forecast quantity should consume and should create the planned orders equal to the nos. of sales order quantity.
So if I have forecast of 500 qtys and sales order of 90 qtys then heuristic run should yield/create the planned order of 90 qtys and there should be 500-90 = 410 forecast quantities remaning.
Please let me know which strategy will be used and other setting in ECC and APO for SNP. I
The setting with strategy 50 in ECC and 30 in APO worked properly with PPDS - RRP3 view but from interactive planning /sapapo/sdp94 it is not working, so there will be different setting for SNP.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Vishal
Edited by: Vishal24a on Oct 13, 2011 9:15 AM

Vishal
Can you please explain what issue you are facing when you load the product in planning book. First thing is do you see 410 against forecast and 90 against sales order key figure ? If yes then it means the forecast is getting consumed properly by SO.
As far as your other requirement goes (planned order should only be created for sale order quantity) you have to change your total demand macro calclation logic. Your total demand key figure should show 90 instead of 500 - so just include sales order in your total demand calculation (stock balance macro) and run heuristic. Your requirement will be satisfied
Thanks
Aparna

Exclude QM lot stock for a perticular material and location for PPDS run

Hi Experts,
I would like to exclude QM lot stock for a perticular material and location for PPDS run. I have unchecked stock in quality inspection under productmaster/ Demand / availability stock in APO, but still QM lot is appearing in RRP3 view and considering for PPDS heuristic run.
Can you plesae explain how to exclude QM lot for a PPDS run.
--Kishore

Hi Kishore,
Some companies do not activate the iModel for Inspection Lots and manage the Inspection Lots as Quality Inspection Stock. For example this how it looks an Inspection Lot in RRP3 if you manage the Inpsection Lots as Stock in Quality Inspection:
Because you are using the iModel transferring Inspection Lots as QM Lots, you can not use the Stock in Quality.
You can read about it in the help of the field Inspection Lots in CFM1. This is the help:
Inspection Lots in Integration Model
You use this indicator to activate the transfer to SAP APO of inspection lots
that are relevant to stock.
Dependencies
You can only activate an integration model for inspection lots if you have
set in CIF Customizing that inspection lots should be transferred for materials
relevant to inspection lots instead of qualitiy inspection stock.
If the inspection lots in SAP APO are to contain the characteristic value
assignements of the batches assigned to them, you have to transfer the
characteristic value assignments to SAP APO before activating the integration
model for inspection lots. You can do this by activating an integration model
for stock.
Hope this clairy your doubt.
Kind Regards,
Mariano

CIF 168 error .. Data in apo is correct

Hi All,
I am getting the CIF 168 error:-
Status of order in R/3 on General tab of Co03 :-
Total Quantity: 946
Delivered Quantity: 685
In rrp3 view in APO:
there is the production order with receipt quantity 261
Error Details:-
=========================================================================
Released Order NO 3132262. Difference in total Quantity. 261(APO) <---> 946 (R/3)
Total Quantity in APO: 261
Total Quantity in R/3 : 946
To rectify the error retransfer the order from R/3 to APO
=========================================================================
actually total quantity in APO should be compared with 946 - 685 = 261 in R/3.
Can anybody suggest how to rectify this error.

Hi Biswajit,
Please follow the instruction as i believe it is similar issue...
CIF - PO ECC to APO - Error mesg no. 181
Hpe This helps.
Regards,
Harshil Desai

Incorrect Initial Stock calc for Semi-finished products in SNP PBook

Dear all,
Situation is as follows:
The Stock list on /SAPAPO/RRP3(Product View) matches the Stock in ECC (MMBE) perfectly. Also when we load the product in our SNP planning book, right click on the Stock on Hand and then Display Stock, it matches the RRP3 and the ECC stock.
Still the actual Initial stock displayed in the Planning book Cell in the initial column and thereafter is different from what the actual sum of stocks should be. This quantity is huge (in millions!). There is no Receipts planned which can contribute to this!!!
Is this a known bug in SAP? Can we rectify by running any programs?
Note: Already tried CCR, OM17, everything looks fine (which actually is because RRP3 view matched ECC perfectly.)
Kindly help.
Regards,
Rimjhim
Edited by: TEAM BASIS on Dec 18, 2008 4:00 PM

Hi ,
I couldn't find any problem with the macro.
One more observation:
The UOM in ECC is KG (in transaction MMBE). The base UOM in APO is ZUN (customized Tonnes).
The conversion in Prod Master is 100 ZUN=7484 KG
If we change this conversion to 1 ZUN = 1 KG then in the planning book the Initial Stock start showing as OK.
The random value shown earlier doesn't seem connected to the UOM conversion, it's just a very very high value. How can there be a connection between UOM conversion and the Initial Stock display.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Rimjhim
Edited by: TEAM BASIS on Dec 19, 2008 12:47 PM

Backorder processing: Error in WMENG quantity

Hello Experts,
Please, I really need a help to solve this problem.
I have a problem with BOP execution in some orders, the order below was requested 5 and we have 3 in stock, and should remain 2:
and when you look in ECC, at TCODE VA03, the quantity remain is 26.660,:
anybody has an idea what's the problem?
I and abap consultant debug the BOP transaction and we look that quantity already wrong in APO side:
Thanks in advance,
Alexandre Landi

Hello Alexandre,
You mentioned that you had already checked this and in APO side the quantity is wrong. But, I would say that the quantity that you're seeing in APO perhaps might be the processed data. What I mean the error in fact could have occured in ECC ( during any of the user exits ) and the sales order has been saved with this erroneous quantity and the same data has been updated back in APO with the Outbound queue that flows to APO.
What you need to do now is, reject the sales document line item completely in ECC. Save it and go to APO and see that the sales document line is disappeared from RRP3 view. Once this is done, open the sales document in vA02 and do an availability check on the sales order line item. Try to see, what is the remaining requirements that is being proposed by the system in the delivery proposal screen. If you see that system is giving the erroneous record at this point, you can confirm that the issue is indeed in APO and one of the user exits in APO could be causing this. Or may be the second substitute product has different Base Unit of Measure and Sales Unit of Measure could also be different., You need to check this. But, if you see the remaining requirements as 2PCs in delivery proposal screen, accept the delivery proposal quantity and save the sales order and see the schedule lines. Do you see an incorrect figures ? If yes - the bug is in ECC side and you need to debug what happened after ATP check results are passed back to ECC from APO. If you see the quantities to be as expected.
Hope this helps
Babu Kilari

There are no scheduled and delivery dates in /sapapo/rrp4

Hi Gurus,
When executing the transaction /sapapo/rrp4, category PO memo are being displayed. But I noticed that there are PO memos that dont have scheduled and delivery dates while the others have. Is this behavior normal? But when compared to transaction /SAPAPO/RRP3, the PO memos that dont have dates in /SAPAPO/RRP4 have dates in transaction /SAPAPO/RRP3. Could you please help me understand why there are PO memos that dont have sheduled and delivery dates when using /SAPAPO/RRP4?
Thanks,
Ann

The rrp4 view shows only receipt elements, such as Planned orders, WIPs etc.In rrp3 view (Product view), we can see both requirement and receipt elements an pegging structure.

Semi finished products

Hi all,
I have the following issue that I am working on.
There is a situation where there are two plants in two locations. When there is a demand in plant A for semifinished product A the demand is propagated to plant B for production(though the two locations are plants it is a business requ). So the situation is tested and working well in ECC. Procurement type for loc A iF and special proc type 71(procured from loc B) is maintained). When the demand is created for plant A and when MRP is run, purchase req and planned orders are created for material A in plant B.
The same situation is to be simulated in APO SNP using optimizer. To plan the mat A for loc A and B in APO and convert the planned orders to production orders in ECC.
I have cifed, materials, BOM,created trans lanes , maintained SNP optimizer settings in APO and ran optmizer for loc A and material A combination. This generated planned orders in rrp3 view. Now the issue is that I cannot see the planned orders and purchase req for mat A in loc B. And also no planned orders are seen in ECC.
Please provide a detailed explanation and further steps.
Sai

Hi,
Pls run the optimiser with prod = A and Loc = A+B
It should work fine. Also in the t code /sapapo/mvm, check if the check box for 'No planned orders without source of supply' is clicked or not. If it is clicked, then you need to maintain a PPM for prod A at loc B. If it is unchecked, optimiser will create planned orders for A at loc B even without a PPM.
Pls let me know if this helps.
Regards
Manotosh

Issue in capturing in transit in SNP interactive planning book

Hi,
We are facing issue in capturing in trasit in SNP interactive planning book.
We are using standard planning area ( 9ASNP02) on which we have build up planning book which is copy of standard planning book. Earlier standard planning area was containing key figure 9AITRAN(in transit)attached to category group (IT1) which contained categories AH, EI.
As intransit was coming under category CS we added category in category group IT1. After adding it the intransit is not visble in planning book in key figure in transit but when we checking details of cell the value is present with start and end date as 01.01.1970 where as in RRP3 view intransit is present under current date.
Before additing category CS in IT1 group the intransit was not coming but now after adding category also the in transit is not visible in cell but present in detail view with wrong dates.
Regards,
Vrushali.

HI,
Stock in transit keyfigure will display only EI orders (incase of VMI
scenario) and AH orders (if you create inbound delivery).
If you integrate stock,CS orders only will be available in /sapapo/RRP3.
The root of the problem is in the setting from Intransit key figure:
from a planning area management point of view it reflects
the setting used in the standard SNP planning area but the customizing
of the category group used there is different from the one used in
standard systems.
Actually you added category CS there. But category CS has a atp category
type 0, which means stocks actually. In the SNP planning books by design
stocks are read separately from other orders because have to be
considered in the ATD computation.
Therefore if you need to read orders with category CS you should
consider it in the category group assigned to the ATD receipts key
figure and to the stock key figure.
This customizing could be applied at the planning area level, as
described above or at the master location level, SNP tab.
In this case you can specify there the category groups which have to be
used in order to consider stocks, ATD receipts and ATD issues about all
products assigned to the used master location. Please refer to the
related F1 helps in order to get more information about.
You can get more information at note 591310.
Regards,
Sunitha

RRP3 View

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for