Rtl co simulation licensing issue with vivado hls 2015.2

ERROR: [Simtcl 6-50] Simulation engine failed to start: A valid license was not found for simulation. Please run the Vivado License Manager for assistance in determining which features and devices are licensed for your system.
I am using 30 day evaluation, c simualtion and c synthesis are workikng but rtl cosimulation not working

Hi
Vivado evaluation license includes HLS license.
http://www.xilinx.com/products/design-tools/vivado/vivado-webpack.html
Please attach the license file along with report_environment.

Similar Messages

  • Does anyone know of any licensing issues with various Adobe shapes?

    I want to use one of the Adobe shapes available in the shape palette ( paw print) for a commercial product, printing it as part of a decorative design on a product. Has anyone heard of any licensing issues with these custom shapes?

    Never heard of any issues, and I’d be stunned speechless (if you know me, that means very stunned) if there were an issue. They are provided with the program to add value and allow you to create artwork, much of which is expected to be commercial. Go for it and don’t sweat.

  • ILA issues with Vivado 2014.3

    I have been trying to run the Avnet Zedboard lab regarding the 802.11 Beacon frame receiver.
    http://zedboard.org/course/integrated-software-defined-radio-zynq%C2%AE-7000-all-programmable-soc
    I have gotten through all the lab work and am ready now to debug my bit stream using the ILA tool.
    dbg_hub and ila are clearly visible in the synthesized and implemented design, but when I load the bitstream I get the following warning messages:
    refresh_hw_device [lindex [get_hw_devices] 1]
    WARNING: [Xicom 50-38] xicom: No CseXsdb register file specified for CseXsdb slave type: 0, cse driver version: 0. Slave initialization skipped.
    WARNING: [Xicom 50-38] xicom: No CseXsdb register file specified for CseXsdb slave type: 0, cse driver version: 0. Slave initialization skipped.
    INFO: [Labtools 27-1434] Device xc7z020 (JTAG device index = 1) is programmed with a design that has no supported debug core(s) in it.
    WARNING: [Labtools 27-3123] The debug hub core was not detected at User Scan Chain 1 or 3. You must manually launch hw_server
    with -e "set xsdb-user-bscan <C_USER_SCAN_CHAIN scan_chain_number>" to detect the debug hub at User Scan Chain of 2 or 4.
    To determine the user scan chain setting, open the implemented design and use: get_property C_USER_SCAN_CHAIN [get_debug_cores dbg_hub].
    WARNING: [Labtools 27-1974] Mismatch between the design programmed into the device xc7z020_1 and the probes file D:/Avnet/Zynq_SDR_2014/vivado/fmcomms2_zed_802_11_RX/fmcomms2_zed_802_11_RX.runs/impl_1/debug_nets.ltx.
    The device design has 0 ILA core(s) and 0 VIO core(s). The probes file has 2 ILA core(s) and 0 VIO core(s).
    Resolution:
    1. Reprogram device with the correct programming file and associated probes file OR
    2. Goto device properties and associate the correct probes file with the programming file already programmed in the device.
    So I ran :
    get_property C_USER_SCAN_CHAIN [get_debug_cores dbg_hub]
    1
    As recommended, I reduced my JTAG clock speed to 3MHz and it did not do anything either.
    I also went back to Vivado 2014.3 - same problem.
    So far no luck, and I have been at this for three days now - very frustrating.
    You cannot use an IDE without proper debugginh tool.
    Am I the only one having these issues? I see there were similar problems with Vivado 2013.3 about a year ago.
    But yet not fixed???
    Arne
     

    Hi
    In 2014.3 you will get these warnings if
    the clock connecetd to the debug hub is not free running clock or active
    the debug hub User Scan Chain setting is 2 or 4 (It is a 1 by default)
    We did realize that the resolution to this warning needs to be more explicit and have fixed it in 2014.4 as follows:
    WARNING: [Labtools 27-3123] The debug hub core was not detected at User Scan Chain 1 or 3.
    Resolution:
    1. Make sure the clock connected to the debug hub (dbg_hub) core is a free running clock and is active OR
    2. Manually launch hw_server with -e "set xsdb-user-bscan <C_USER_SCAN_CHAIN scan_chain_number>" to detect the debug hub at User Scan Chain of 2 or 4. To determine the user scan chain setting, open the implemented design and use: get_property C_USER_SCAN_CHAIN [get_debug_cores dbg_hub].
    Thanks
    Smitha

  • Licensing issues with Trial version?

    I'm trying to make changes to a pre-existing Flash file that
    I got from someone else. I only have an educational version of
    Flash, and I know there are licensing problems with using that for
    commercial use...but what about if I downloaded the trial version
    and made changes to the file with that?

    1)
    unable to populate database values at  speak  List in flash Builder4.6  The fallowing code is used
    <fx:Script>
      <![CDATA[
       import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
       private function getIteamCategory():void {
       avar sqlConnection:SQLConnection = new SQLConnection();
      var resultSet:SQLResult = null ;
      var dataList:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
      sqlConnection.open(File.applicationStorageDirectory.resolvePath("IDatabase.db"));
      var stmt:SQLStatement = new SQLStatement();
      stmt.sqlConnection = sqlConnection;
       stmt.text="SELECT  item_category FROM Menu_Table where item_id  between 1 and 99";
      stmt.execute();
      data_list.dataProvider=new ArrayCollection(stmt.getResult().data);
       sqlConnection.close();
      return dataList;
            protected function datalist _creationCompleteHandler (event:FlexEvent):void  //executed when the List completes loading
                getIteamCategory ();
      ]]>
      <b/fx:Script>
    <s:List id="datalist" x="10" y="10" left="0" right="0" top="0" bottom="0" width="1004"
            height="500"
            creationComplete="datalist _creationCompleteHandler(event)" enabled="true">
        <s:itemRenderer>
            <fx:Component>
                <s:MobileItemRenderer label = "{data. item_category }"/>  // The Application is a mobile app
            </fx:Component>
        </s:itemRenderer>
    </s:List>
    Please suggest, I also included mx.swc file in the build path. Also seeing following several error message, pasting two of them
    1120: Access of undefined property ContainerBorderSkin.
    1172: Definition mx.skins.spark:ButtonSkin could not be found.          NewIndianCurryHous
    Thanks in advance.

  • Vivado HLS 2015.x config_interface -register_io

    Hello!
    In VHLS 2015.x there is new option: config_interface -register_io. From User guide it is not clear to what types of interface this option can be applied though. Can you confirm that this option can be applied to ap_bus m_axi interface signals? If yes does this mean that AXI Register Slice core is additiobally inserted on this m_axi interface? 
    I am using Virtex-7 2000t device and trying to fight timing issues in my hls core by flourplanning hls core to different SLR. HLS core has AXI master interface to AXI bus with external DDR memory. All AXI bus components including AXI Interconnect IP and DDR3 MIG core are flourplanned to SLR1 and HLS core to SLR2. I know that it is critical to register all nets that cross SLR boundary on both sides of it. I can insert AXI register slice on AXI Interconnect IP  port and I what to do the same on HLS side. 
    If config_interface -register_io can not do what I want my second thought was to add one more AXI Interconnect IP on HLS side inserting AXI register slice on port that is to connect to main AXI Interconnect.
    What can you suggest?  
     

    Thanks for the reply.
    Took a while to test your suggestion.
    axi mmu was not enough to change the behavior of the address editor.
    Still, I failed to have my AXI master interfaces capable of 64 bit addressing.
    The axi master should support 64 bits for the axi_mmu to map 64bit addresses.
    Though, Vivado (address editor) thinks my module has only 32bit aw_addr / ar_addr channels, even though I do have 64bit aw_addr / ar_addr channels.
    Actually,
    My goal was to provide a DMA64 (high memory DMA in other cases)capability to a prototype DRAM based SSD on the VC709 board.
    This function was required in order to eliminate the need of bounce buffers (bouncing high memory buffers into DMA'able addresses via memcpy & stuff) in the host side.
    In this case, the AXI master is my module, accessing to the axi pcie axi slave port, looking at axi2pci apertures.
    I had to access axi2pci apertures which has axi addresses mapped way above 0xFFFF_FFFF (something like 0x0001_0000_0000_0000 ~ 0x0001_FFFF_FFFF_FFFF axi2pci apertures, to access host side DMA addresses such as 0x0000_0003_EC0B_0000)
    During the way, I failed to address axi2pci above 32 bits even though I gave "config_interface -m axi_addr64" with my HLS module.
    Eventually I managed to use the axi datamover IP, or axi cdma IP in order to achieve my goals, since the IPs were capable of addressing 64 bit axi addresses.
    Though I am still wondering about 64 bit address generation in HLS.  Actually what happens when we apply "config_interface -m axi_addr64" directive. 
    If it worked as I intended, I could have made AXI4 mm transactions directly from my HLS code.
    Regards,
    Woong.
     

  • Issue with Lightroom CC 2015's before and after (\) - Windows 7

    Okay, I downloaded Lr CC 2015 and everything is working great except for one thing - before and after. I edit an image then move to another (settings synced but needs a few refinements). I finish the edit and hit \ to take a look at where it started. When I do so, Lr decides to go back to the previous image, thinks about it, then shows me the before of the correct image. After the first time pressing \ it doesn't happen again, unless you move to another image. A little irritating, but something I can put up with. Is anyone having the same issue? Everything is up to date; graphics, OS, etc. Also worth noting, this does not happen with Lr 5.7.
    Any ideas, or should I post a bug report over on feedback.photoshop.com?
    Thank you,
    Benjamin

    Issue with Lightroom CC 2015 - Before and After (\)

  • Licensing issue with Windows Server 2012 R2 Essential

    Hi,
    we purchased a server that came with Windows Server 2012 Essentials. and we found out some of the issue regarding the licensing. I would like to verify it with the experts here.
    1. This Essential O.S. cannot be deployed as a member server in the domain, only Windows server 2012 r2 Standard and data center is capable as deploy as a member server? 
    2. does it work with a single domain with multiple domain controllers and one primary domain controller? Example, 10 offices in different states, each location has a domain controller in their office, I'm installing to install this Essential server as another
    domain controller in one of the offices for redundancy purpose. I promoted this server into domain controller with success, but it gives me an fsmo error everyday, and warning about shutting down if i don't transfer the fsmo role to this server.
    3. which leads to this question, so this Essential OS can only be deploy as a single domain as the primary domain controller? Up to 25 user and 50 device license?
    4. Is it possible to deploy it as a domain controller (that office has less than 25 users) in that office while syncing correctly with the other 10 domain controllers in other offices, they are all in the same single domain? I can't make this work, and I
    think due to the Essential O.S.'s limitation.
    5. we use a vpn connection to connect all the office together, and all the domain controller uses lan ip address to communicate with each other.
    Thank you for the help in advance. I have been researching for the past couple days, but I still couldn't get a clear answer. Thank you again.

    Hi Cliff,
    Thank you for your reply.
    1. We will get a new server 2012 r2 standard to deploy as member server.
    2 and 3. Only ONE domain controller can hold all FSMO roles in a single domain, correct? Currently an windows 2003 enterprise, this is our first server in our domain, it holds all the FSMO roles currently. 
    4. Yes, we realized essentials will not work for us, so we are switching to 2012 r2 standard to deploy for the new
        domain controller for our new office, still under the same domain. 
    5. This wasn't a question, just wanted to give out the connection information.
    The problem was that We didn't read the Essentials in detail when buying the new server, on dell website, it said it was perfect for small business, we didn't know it has to run as a primary DC. it was great in price, and it doesn't need CALs.
    but we quickly realized after deploying it as a DC, it gives us error about Server Licensing compliance, and will shut down automatically. Then we were going to use it as a member server to run application, and realized we couldn't. So we are returning the
    server, and getting a new one with standard r2 2012 and CALs license. 
    It was a costly mistake.
    Thank you again.

  • Creative Cloud license issues with second computer

    My company bought CC and I have it installed and running on computer A. However, computer B is having trouble. I've downloaded the CC Desktop, and installed the app's I want on my computer - but when I start a program and it ask's to START TRIAL or LICENSE THIS PRODUCT it asks me for the serial number.
    With computer A this didn't happen. All I needed was my account information. Do I need my Admin to send me another invitation for computer B, or is there a technical issue I need to address?
    Thanks for the help in advance,
    S

    MeadowRyan wrote:
    Absolutely - every time I close an application and then restart it I am asked to relicense - annoying as can be...
    As Ken G. suggested before, you need to update to Photoshop's latest version. To install the update, open Photoshop and choose Help > Updates. That solves the "trial version" issue. At least it did for me.

  • License issue with Intune

    In the Intune account portal when I try to assign a Intune license to a user I get the following error :
    There was a problem with this user&#39;s license assignments.
    The user has Intune already installed and is linked to the designated user. Any idea why I get this?
    I am assigning with an administrator account and I do have 125 licenses available. (Already using 6 succesfully on other users)
    Any help with be appreciated.

    Hi
    I guess the reason UCCX 8 is stating the package  is none because none of the licenses you have received contains the feature which states if the server will act as standard/enhanced/premium package server
    ====
    XXXX CRS_PREICDSRVR cisco 8.0 permanent uncounted \
         VENDOR_STRING=1 HOSTID=ANY \
    ======
    The license should have the field as stated above were CRE_PREICDSRVR states this is the base licence with premium pacakage
    hope this helps
    Anuj

  • License Issue with 8.0.2 Fresh Build

    Guys
    We purchased UCCX 7 for an install and then were advised to move to 8.  As we had just built the server, with no scripts/users, we thought we would get the disk, blow away the previous install and then put the license on.....so easy in theory.
    Went well up to the licensing part, when the licence we got from Cisco failed with a The license for Cisco Unified Standard ESW or UCSS upgrade is not a valid addition for the package None and will therefor be ignored. etc etc etc
    Spoke to Cisco who gave us a new license for V8.0.2 install....which failed on The license for Cisco Unified CCX Premium Seat is not a valid addition for the package None and therefore it will be ignored.
    When I look to the console and Show UCCX License, it tells me
    Package: NoneCisco Unified CCX license package is None.  Please upload a valid licence file through Cisco Unified CCX Administration....
    Cisco have now escalated this to a TAC engineer, but does anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks
    Ian

    Hi
    I guess the reason UCCX 8 is stating the package  is none because none of the licenses you have received contains the feature which states if the server will act as standard/enhanced/premium package server
    ====
    XXXX CRS_PREICDSRVR cisco 8.0 permanent uncounted \
         VENDOR_STRING=1 HOSTID=ANY \
    ======
    The license should have the field as stated above were CRE_PREICDSRVR states this is the base licence with premium pacakage
    hope this helps
    Anuj

  • Licensing issues with altered tools.jar

    Hello,
    I wanted to know, if it would be permitted if I would ship an edited tools.jar with my application.
    I would not charge my customer for the original Java-source code, I would also include the license-files that come along with the tools.jar and I would even make the affected code available publicly. Would that be enough or is it simply prohibited?

    Hi,
    Note that your version of Ubuntu is beta and we don't support beta software. This means that even if the problem exists and is reproducible we would wait for the open source team to release a production version.
    Frank

  • Licensing issues with Server 2012

    Hello everyone, 
    having an issue getting my licensing server to recognize our remote desktop licences. 
    I have purchased and installed the license pack, the licensing server is the same machine that the clients will be connecting to. I have also set the licensing mode to per user, but in the diagnoser it still appears as 0 licenses available. 
    any ideas or other things I can try

    Hi Shane,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    In addition you can refer following article for information.
    RD Licensing Configuration on Windows Server 2012
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2013/09/20/rd-licensing-configuration-on-windows-server-2012.aspx
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • License issue with LR5 installed before subscribing to CC

    Hi,
    I purchased a LR4 license in april 2012.
    In august 2012, I subscribed to full CC -and I still have an active subscribtion.
    My MacBook has has an LR5 trial version installed.
    I I can no more use it, as LR asks for serial number.
    So I reinstalled a brand new copy of LR from Creative Cloud manager. I was expecting my active subscription to give me the rights to use it.
    But my mac still seems to consider it as a standalone trial version, and asks for a serial #.
    What should I try ?
    Thanks.

    I see that even though you re-installed Lightroom application , it has been reverted as trial.
    You can follow below steps:
    1)Lightroom does not have uninstaller file for Mac computer installation.  Simply Trash the Lightroom application from Applications folder.
    2)Trash Adobe Creative Cloud , Adobe Application Manager folders from Utilities ,  ( No need to run uninstaller file for Creative Cloud).
    3)
    a) Right click on Finder icon and  select "Go-To Folder " option.
      b) You will get a text box, type-in below command and then hit 'Return' key.( Do not miss ~ symbol)
    ~/library
    c)Then navigate to Application Support>Adobe.
    d)Open Adobe folder and trash folders named AAMUpdater and OOBE.
    4)
    a) Right click on Finder icon and  select "Go-To" Folder option.
      b) You will get a text box, type-in below command and then hit 'Return' key.
    /library
    c)Then navigate to Application Support>Adobe.
    d)Open Adobe folder and trash folders named AAMUpdater ,Adobe Application Manager and OOBE.
    [Note: Mac computers has 2 libraries : ~/library and /library
    5)
    Click on the below link and download Adobe Creative Cloud Cleaner tool and run the same:
    Select the option Adobe Application manager for Mac OS X and then click on Clean up selected :
    https://helpx.adobe.com/content/help/en/creative-suite/kb/cs5-cleaner-tool-installation-pr oblems/_jcr_content/main-pars/…
    Then click on the below link and download and install Creative Cloud desktop application :
    https://creative.adobe.com/products/creative-cloud
    Once installation process is completed, sign in and check whether Lightroom is available with Install button and click on install button.
    Then launch Lightroom application and check.

  • License issues with PS CS6

    I have been running PS CS6 Extended on my Mac for some time.  I recently upgraded to 13.0.2 using the adobe updater, and now I'm getting these warnings that my trial will run out in x days (it's 29 days now).  Here's the window I keep getting:
    I've even entered my license one time to make it go away, but that only worked for that one session.  I am not using creative cloud and I have a local full license.  Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Dave

    You are not the only one.  Read these links.  http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1114727?tstart=0  and   http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1115225?tstart=60

  • License issue with ISE setup

    Good Day All,
    For a setup of 2 ISE on 2 site, connected via a WAN Link. A 1000 users license is used.
    My question is that if the WAN link is down, how will the license distribution be?
    Will the secondary policy cease to accept new connection? or will be allow up to 500? or 1000?
    Thanks & Regards
    Andrew

    This would depend on the ISE structure. If you only have one admin node then the connection to that admin node drops...the other ISE will stop funtioning, but if you have some sort of redundancy builtin to the structure it is possible to continue using both assuming you can use the same license base, but if you have 500 device license on one, and 500 on the other, then that will be the limit for each location.
    For instance we have a single admin node, but 2 locations using ISE for VPN users....if the link goes down here, then no one can connect at the remote site. But people that connect to the VPN here will continue to function.

Maybe you are looking for