Rtorrent-mod: rtorrent with a nicer interface

I don't know if this is the right sub forum or if this is supposed to go to artwork. Anyway, I made a small rewrite of rtorrent main screen:
added features:
- added colors
- torrent display shortened to 2 lines, better visibility
- added peer count to main screen
- better formatting on screen resize
- other small tweaks to torrent infos
- an IP filter patch (upstream ticket)
- example rtorrent.rc
AUR package
Please test and post your suggestions (too many colors? bugs in display? other stuff?).
Thanks.
Last edited by karabaja4 (2011-03-02 02:17:25)

tomk wrote:Good work, but you should submit it upstream. Only Arch users will see it here.
Will do. Since I never done that before via Trac, does it involve just opening a ticket with patch attached?
litemotiv wrote:looks great, if you could add a string filter with / it will be superawesome!
Please be more specific, I didn't understand your request

Similar Messages

Start rtorrent in tmux with systemd

I am trying to setup a server with rtorrent, but it closes or will not run.
[Unit]
Description=rTorrent
Requires=network.target local-fs.target
[Service]
Type=oneshot
RemainAfterExit=yes
KillMode=none
User=nobody
ExecStart=/usr/bin/tmux new-session -s rt -n rtorrent -d rtorrent
ExecStop=/usr/bin/tmux send-keys -t rt:rtorrent C-q
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
I following commands, works find in terminal.
[root@Server ~]# sudo -u nobody tmux new-session -s rt -n rtorrent -d rtorrent
[root@Server ~]# sudo -u nobody tmux send-keys -t rt:rtorrent C-q
[root@Server ~]# sudo -u nobody tmux attach -t rt
So it is not because rtorrent cannot run as nobody, so does anyone know what I am doing wrong?

Not an Arch discussion, moving to Apps & DEs...

Redundancy with dual nic servers

Hi I have 2 11500's configured with box-to-box redundancy. I have a number of app servers each with dual nic's (which are Teamed) and which are connected directly to the CSS's. Nic 1 in each goes to the master CSS1 and is therefore live. Nic2 goes to standby CSS2.The CSS's are connected two 4500 switches to the public.I am monitoring the links to the 4500's,if i switch off the master CCS1,we fail over and the servers all connect via nic2 to the new master CCS2. But when the link to the 4500 from the CSS1 Master goes down the CSS'S failover but the nic2's do not connect to the CCS2 because Nic 1 in each server has not failed ie they still see CSS1 as up. Is there a workaround to this problem ?
Thanks
J

I know of no way to link CSS interfaces so that if the uplink goes down, the the other ports are shutdown. There may be another way to configure the adapter teaming or failover on the server side. I know some OS's send out test frames from one adapter to the other to verify network integrity.
What I'd recommend is that you setup a VLAN on your 4500's for the server's physical connections, and uplink that to a "backend" interface on the CSS. This can be done with the CSS in either a router or bridge configuration, but I'd recommend router mode.

Make a router out of a simple notebook with one NIC (buy a second NIC)

Hello all,
Before starting, I think I must say hello to you because I'm new here : this is my first post . So, in fact, I'm working with Linux since 5 years. I'm running Gentoo on my workstation and my old server, Ubuntu on my notebook and for family, and finaly, I'm running Red Hat at work place for workstation and servers. I'm a Linux and JBoss administrator .
I've decided to run/try Arch because it seams to growth with rock-solid ideas and it's a binary distribution. I now prefer a binary distribution for my server, because it's taking too much time to let old computer or notebook compile the whole world (alone or not ...). I prefer now looking around and learn another Linux distribution. This is why I started to install my first Arch Linux : I will try to run a server on a simple notebook. In fact, it's a working machine, but without any graphics capabilities (memory has burned...), and so, perfect for a little server low consumption. I want it to replace my current server/router running Gentoo on an old Pentium 3.
For now, I've encountered these little problem :
- LID problem when screen is close : reboot never work (power off just after the BIOS, when the LID state is "screen closed"...) => disable LID connection (unplugged from motherboard)
- ssh problem => must now use "/etc/hosts.allow" to let remote machine to be connected
- try routing packet with one NIC => for now, doesn't work ...
- try to get X11 Forwarding => doesn't work too, but it will works quickly
My infrastructure is just a server/router splitting in two part for the LAN at home :
- one part is LAN with all workstations
- the other part is LAN_router which is another network with only the ADSL router to access internet
So, its looking like this : <machine1> => <switch> => <[eth1]server/router[eth0]> => <switch> => <router_ADSL> => INTERNET
All is fine ... with the old machine ... for the new one, it has only one network interface ... The question is : how to do routing with only one NIC ???
In theory, I "should" work ... but .. some component can have some little hard time to do the right things .. and for me, is not working right now.
The first try is to use one interface with one IP aliasing, like this :
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:1d:e4:a3:d5:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.2.1.8/26 brd 10.2.1.63 scope global eth0
inet 10.2.1.66/26 brd 10.2.1.127 scope global eth0:0
inet6 fc80::21a:e2ff:fea3:d56a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Two sub network are used :
- 10.2.1.0/26
- 10.2.1.64/26
I must have 2 ip on one NIC, so aliasing can be used (when testing, the new server/router is able to ping a workstation and the ADSL router ; it can also use internet). I've heart there is some problem with "iptables" to set forwarding rules when using IP Aliasing ... but I prefer try myself . It doesn't work for now, probably because of this. But, is there a way to use a "workaround" ? For example, if "iptables" is not able to play with aliasing, and so, interface such as "eth0:0", may be there is a way to tell it, like this :
[root@serveurn ~]# iptables-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.10 on Sun Dec 12 17:30:01 2010
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
-A POSTROUTING ! -d 10.2.1.0/26 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 10.2.1.66
COMMIT
# Completed on Sun Dec 12 17:30:01 2010
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.10 on Sun Dec 12 17:30:01 2010
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [9:932]
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -s 10.2.1.0/26 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
# Completed on Sun Dec 12 17:30:01 2010
... use the interface "eth0" (for the whole throughput) and do SNAT for all excepted for the LAN network ? But it seams to not work ...
I got a second idea : if it wan't work with aliasing ... may be can I use virtual interface and bridge ... create a bridge with "eth0" and "tap0" so I can add more than one ip in the machine .. and may be, will be able to route packet from these two interface ???
But for now, I have to understand why X11 Forwarding don't work ...
EDIT: xorg problem solved : xorg-auth was requested ...
Last edited by loopx (2011-01-09 18:08:28)

fukawi2 wrote:" ...it is dirty and nasty and shouldn't be done unless you're stuck on a deserted island and your only hope of rescue is building a router out of 2 coconuts, a sea shell and a single NIC that was washed up on the beach in the last storm. "
PRICELESS !!
@loopx: Honestly: return the USB NIC you just got, buy a compatible device(maybe an asus rt-n16) and install dd-wrt. You'll be a lot happier....
Last edited by Daniel_F (2011-01-10 00:34:08)

How to setup the DirectAccess on windows server 2012 r2 essentials with 2 nics

I have a server with two network cards (the first card NIC called "Internet" and the second NIC called "Local Network") with static IP both.
The computer has "DomainName.local"
I still have not connected to the internet with my company domain-name from my server
I have installed and configured the DHCP, DNS, WINS, and trouble-free operation
I have also installed the role "DirectAccess and VPN"
But here we face the problem that I can not set the directaccess with two Network Interface Card
Any information found on pages from microsoft none met my needs
Can you help, set the DirectAccess with my server ?

Hi:
Remove/disable the "internet" nic and connect the server and all stations to a switch. Connect the switch to the router/firewall at the edge. Server stopped doing NAT after 2003.
Larry Struckmeyer[MVP] If your question is answered please mark the response as the answer so that others can benefit.

BadRequest: Virtual machines with secondary network interfaces and virtual machines with no secondary network

I'm trying to create an "ExtraLarge" VM with multiple NICs. The New-AzureVM returns the following error:
BadRequest: Virtual machines with secondary network interfaces and virtual machines with no secondary network
interfaces are not supported in the same deployment, also a virtual machine having no secondary network interfaces
cannot be updated to have secondary network interfaces and vice-versa.
But I have no other VMs. Or at least I did and then deleted them and all their disks. The service has no deployments (either staging or production).
Why is New-AzureVM complaining about a mismatch of VMs with and without secondary network interfaces when no other VMs exist?
I have tried many things to fix this, including the deletion of ALL of my resources. I have deleted and created the service many times, both with an affinity group and without. I have a screen print of the -debug output if your interested.
Thanks for the outstanding help.

Hi Ron,
IMPORTANT NOTE: Please do not post the CONFIDENTIAL DETAILS ever on the public forums, this is HIGH RISK action.
Please send an email with your contact details to my email
[email protected] so that I guide you on steps which help you come out of the current scenario. Thank you for understanding.
I suggest you to create a new VNET and new VM with cloud services. Create Multiple NIC VM. Let us know the results.
Ref:
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/10/30/multiple-vm-nics-and-network-virtual-appliances-in-azure/
http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2014/11/04/step-by-step-create-a-vm-with-multiple-nics-in-azure.aspx
If you are unable to create a VM with multiple NIC, please open a support case as it requires more confidential information which is out of scope of FORUM support offerings.
Regards,
Girish

Audio problems with an USB interface

Hi everyone, this is my first post and glad to finally do it.
I am so pleased with arch linux, it's just simply amazing. I have learnt a lot following the wikis, it's pretty simple and effective.
I managed to install and configure ssh server, samba server (surprisingly easy), usb samsung laser printer, nvidia drivers, KDE desktop (so fast in arch), fonts, cpu scaling and I'm so happy with the results and perfomance.
The only problem I ran into is about audio, I think the wiki on audio is pretty incomplete (don't get me wrong I enjoy your work).
The problem is with an USB interface line 6 toneport gx (http://line6.com/toneportgx/), I know the device is meant to be an usb guitar interface but since I don't longer play guitar I use it as soundcard. As complementary information it works with no problem on Ubuntu 10.04 (which is the distro I came from).
The interface works and it's unmuted since I dmix does not work when I try to play sounds from different sources I had to install pulseaudio. Pulseaudio works partially, the sound was improved and finally I am able to play different sources. The big problem is when high cpu load ocurrs the the audio dies and does not come back even when the cpu loads decrease.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.

You may want to debug pulseaudio (check their wiki to see how, involves running pulseaudio in verbose mode) to see what happens.

VMM 2012 sp1: unable to create a logical switch on team with different nics (bug?)

Hyper-V Host is HP Proliant G7 with 4 onboard nics and additional (different) 4-port adapter, all 1Gbit. Server 2012 with latest updates.
VMM 2012 is sp1 with latest updates, server 2012 running in a vm.
When I create a logical switch with teamed uplink port profile in VMM, the job builds the team but fails to create the vswitch when ports from both onboard nics and adapter is used.
I am able to create a vswitch manually on the team if I do it directly on the host.
If the team is created on either purely onboard nics or purely adapter nics, the logical switch creation succeeds.
In short terms: I am able to create a vswitch based on a server 2012 team with different nics, but not a logical switch. Why?

I have tried assigning both nics in one step, and one by one. When I create the logical switch team with only one nic it succeeds, but then fails when I add the second (unless it is similar to the first).
Error in VMM is
Error (2912)
An internal error has occurred trying to contact the dkfuzhv01.mia.local server: : .
WinRM: URL: [http://dkfuzhv01.mia.local:5985], Verb: [GET], Resource: [http://schemas.microsoft.com/wbem/wsman/1/wmi/root/scvmm/ErrorInfo?ID=1010]
Unknown error (0x80041001)
Recommended Action
Check that WS-Management service is installed and running on server dkfuzhv01.mia.local. For more information use the command "winrm helpmsg hresult". If dkfuzhv01.mia.local is a host/library/update server or a PXE server role then ensure that
VMM agent is installed and running.
If I add the second non-similar team member from the host itself, I get this error from nic teaming wizard
Validation failed and changes to the system are rolled back
It is not a question of losing connection (been there), management interface is on a different team. And it also fails when second team member is added directly on the host...
So far I will stick to the conclusion that my problem is with logical switch and different nics :)
Oh, by the way nics are HP NC382i (Broadcom) and NC365T (Intel)

RAC connection problem with interconnect NIC failure

We have an 11g 2-node test RAC setup on RHEL 4 that is configured to have no load balancing (client or server), with Node2 existing as a failover node only. Connection and vip failover works fine in most situations (public interface fail, node fail, cable pull, node 2 interconnect fail, interconnect switch fail etc etc).
When the node1 interconnect card failure is emulated (ifdown eth1):
node2 gets evicted and reboots
failover of existing connections occurs
VIP from node2 is relocated to node1
However new connection attempts from clients and the server receive a ORA-12541: TNS:no listener message.
The basis of this is the issue that in the event of an interconnect failure, the lowest number node is supposed to survive - it looks like this includes the situation where the lowest number node has a failed interconnect NIC; ie it has a hardware fault.
I checked this with Oracle via an iTAR quite some time ago (under 10g) and they eventually confirmed that this eviction of the healthy 2nd node is correct behaviour. In 10g, this situation would result in the remaining instance failing due to the unavailable NIC, however I did not get the chance to fully test and resolve this with Oracle.
In 11g, the alert log continuously reports the NIC's unavailability. The instance remains up, but new connections cannot be established. If the NIC is re-enabled then new connections are able to be established. At all times, srvctl status nodeapps on the surviving node and lsnrtcl show that the listener is functional.
The alert log reports the following, regarding a failed W000 or M000 process:
ospid 13165: network interface with IP address 192.168.1.1 no longer operational
requested interface 19.2.168.1.1 not found. Check output from ifconfig command
ORA-603 : opidrv aborting process W000 ospid (16474_2083223480)
Process W000 died, see its trace file
The W000 trace file refers to an Invalid IP Address 192.168.1.1 (the interconnect ip address) obviously the source of the process dying.
Finally, if I restart the remaining instance via srvctl stop/start instance with the NIC still unavailable, the instance will allow new connections and does not report the failures of the W000/M000 process or appear to care about the failed NIC.
Before I go down the iTAR path or start posting details of the configuration, has anyone else experienced/resolved this, or can anyone else test it out?
Thanks for any input,
Gavin
Listener.ora is:
SID_LIST_LISTENER_NODE1=
(SID_LIST=
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST)
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST1)
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST2)
SID_LIST_LISTENER_NODE2=
(SID_LIST=
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST)
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST2)
(SID_DESC=
(ORACLE_HOME=/u01/app/oracle/product/11.1.0/db_1)
(SID_NAME=RAC_INST1)
LISTENER_NODE1 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=vip-NODE1)(PORT=1521)(IP=FIRST))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=NODE1)(PORT=1521)(IP=FIRST))
LISTENER_NODE2 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=vip-NODE2)(PORT=1521)(IP=FIRST))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=NODE2)(PORT=1521)(IP=FIRST))
)

Thanks for your reply.
There is no NIC bonding - the interconnect is a single, dedicated Gigabit link connected via a dedicated switch: plenty of bandwidth.
I know that providing interconnect NIC redundancy would provide a fallback position on this (although how far do you go: redundant interconnect switches as well?), and that remains an option.
However that's not the point. RAC does not require a redundant interconnect - as a high-availability solution it should inherently provide a failover position that continues to provide an available instance, as it does for all other component failures.
Unless I've made a mistake in the configuration (which is very possible, but all the other successful failover scenarios suggest I haven't), then this could be a scenario that renders a 2-node cluster unavailable to new connections.
Gavin

Javamail with 2 NIC, cannot connect to host port 25

Hi
How do I use Javamail on a PC with 2 NIC connection? 1 to the internet and another to another network.
I tried disable the one to another network and my program can work. If both network connection is up, I received connection error to host at port 25.
Do I need to add anything to my program for it to work on 2 NIC PC?
          java.security.Security.addProvider(new com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider());
          //Set the host smtp address
          Properties props = new Properties();
          props.put("mail.transport.protocol", "smtp");
          props.put("mail.smtp.host", SMTP_HOST_NAME);
          props.put("mail.smtp.starttls.enable","true");
          Authenticator auth = new SMTPAuthenticator();
          //auth = null;
          Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, auth);
          session.setDebug(false);
          // create a message
          Message msg = new MimeMessage(session);
          MimeBodyPart attachFilePart = new MimeBodyPart();
          FileDataSource fds = new FileDataSource(attachment);
          attachFilePart.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(fds));
          attachFilePart.setFileName(fds.getName());
          Multipart mp = new MimeMultipart();
          MimeBodyPart textPart = new MimeBodyPart();
          textPart.setContent(message, "text/plain");
          mp.addBodyPart(textPart);
          mp.addBodyPart(attachFilePart);
          InternetAddress[] addressTo = new InternetAddress[recipients.size()];
          for (int i = 0; i < recipients.size(); i++)
               addressTo[i] = new InternetAddress(recipients.get(i));
          msg.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, addressTo);
          msg.setSubject(subject);
          msg.setContent(mp);
          Transport.send(msg);Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Shawn

Normally the networking system on your PC will choose the appropriate interface to connect
to the host you're trying to connect to. If that's not working, it's probably a Windows problem.
Follow the JavaMail FAQ tip for debugging connection problems by connecting with telnet,
if that fails as well, it's definitely a Windows problem.

OTV site vlan with multiple overlay interface

Hi,
I have an OTV multihoming sites. 2 sites. 2 otv edge device each site.
and with multiple overlay interface sharing 1 joint interface
otv edge device connected to multiple VDC.
each internal / downlink will forward different vlan for each vdc.
================================
example
int overlay 1
otv extends-vlan 10
int overlay 2
otv extends vlan 20
int eth 2/1
description trunk to VDC1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,100
int eth 2/2
description trunk to VDC2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 20,100
otv site-vlan 100
================================
i understand that i can only use 1 site vlan.
so in order for the failover to happen, both eth 2/1 and eth2/2 must fail?
what if only int eth2/1 fail? will the int overlay 1 failover to secondary otv device?
thanks,
ivan

"So when querying the adjacency server the ED then knows which other ED is within the same site?"
Yes for the first part of the question, using the site Vlan unique to each site.
Why do you need a routed link between ED's at local site? You dont need to connect those back-back over L3. Moreover if you want to use it for L3 ADJ over peer-link, you need to make sure that VLAN that you are using is not allowed on the VPC member ports, just on the peer-link, else VPC loop alrorithm will break your traffic.
Are you planning to use multicast or a Unicast deployment? I remember I tried testing the topology in a POC for one of my customer, things did not work as expected in multicast deployment mode and worked fine in Unicast Adjacency server mode. I need to go back and check my notes on this.
I would rather have the join-interface go back to a routed core at site rather than back-back connecivity as it opens up the tested Multicast deployment mode.
Cheers,
-amit singh

Using 1 Mac with 2 NICs on different networks

Sorry to re-hash an old topic but I haven't been able to find an answer that has worked for me. I currently have a MacBook Air with 2 network interfaces (Airport and USB ethernet). I work at a place where all of our e-mail and Internet traffic is done through wireless direxct to the Internet so I use the airport for this. My USB ethernet NIC is hard wired into the corporate network at the customer's site and is used for internal websites and certain shared drives.
Currently, I have the airport as the top preferred network so Internet traffic is working just find for that in OSX and I have a virtual machine set up with the ethernet card directly assigned to it and this lets me use the customer's network for my other work. I'd like to ditch the virtual machine altogether. The airport is the primary connection and it gets its DNS entries from the woreless router. The ethernet port also gets a DHCP address and has the customer's 2 DNS server entries in it.
How can I get OSX to use the wireless for all traffic (basically everything over the Internet) and then use the ethernet connection for all the customer's websites and shared drives (including resolving DNS entries). Am I going about this the wrong way and I should be making the ethernet port primary and anything external goes through wifi? Thanks for any help you can give.

Merry Christmas & Welcome to discussions! I think this link should give you the information you need to use iPod with 2 computers.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=61131

Mode bidirectional with 8255A + PCI 6025E

I've tried to interface the 8255 of PCI6025E in mode 2 with a µcontroler PIC but not successful. Need help to configure and program 8255 in mode 2, Is there any examples or already written programs ( Vi)
Advance thanks for your advises

Hello;
I'm attaching an example that shows how to do that.
Hope this helps.
Filipe A.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Attachments:
8255Mode2.zip ‏12 KB

Security Manager on server with teamed NICs ?

Can anyone confirm that Security Manager will run on server with teamed NICs (i.e. 2 physical connections, but 1 logical IP address) ?
I ask because the data sheet for Security Manager 3.0.1 states :-
"100BASE-T (100 Mbps) or faster network connection; single interface only". and
"One static IP address".
I already have a server that meets all the specs, but it has dual NICs to dual switches for resilience, teamed together with a single IP. The Cisco document is open for interpretation, so has anyone got a definitive answer or is running a setup like this already ?
Thanks.
Mark.

It's recommended that you can use only one interface when installing CSM. However, if the second interface is using the same IP it should not be a problem.

Ids 4235 with single sensing interface

hi guys,
I have an IDS 4235 which i upgraded to 6.0(5)E3 version.
it has only one sension interface,now how can i keep it in inline mode??
any ideas please help.

With a single interface you'll need to trunk two vlans to your sensor, an "inside" and and "outside" vlan (just like a firewall) and configure your sensor for in-line vlan paris
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ips/6.0/configuration/guide/idm/dmInter.html#wp1029962

Rtorrent-mod: rtorrent with a nicer interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for