Rule execution is delayed

I have a rule that announces the arrival of a particular sender's message with three steps: move the message to a folder, play a sound, bounce the Mail icon. In recent weeks, the message arrives, gets moved, and the icon bounces. Sometime later, when I'm doing something with another message, the sound kicks in. I've tried reordering the rule steps and had added and removed the "Stop evaluating rules" step, but it doesn't make a difference.
Any thoughts?

In article <[email protected]>, Eck wrote:
> One user is complaining about non-functional
> rules , which are running correctly for a while and then some of the
> rules in the set are no more executing. Rules had been completely
> deleted and recreated. After a while rules are non-functional again.
> Has anyone hints on this "feature"?
>
I would suspect something might show in a contents check for this user.
So if you follow the best practice of having one of these run for the
whole PostOffice every week or month, check the most recent one first,
and then run an additional one for the user in question. I suspect
that there is an error that isn't actually clearing, "Correctable
conditions encountered:" doesn't mean it is always truly successful in
fixing and may require some manual steps to fix.
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!

Similar Messages

WMS dropping rules execution time.

Hi Community!
We're facing problem in our OEBS 12.1.3 production environment with dropping rules execution time.
Execution can take a long time (10-15 minutes) if it started from standart interface by warehouse worker, but from the other side same query executes in few seconds in sqlplus.
I'll be very grateful if someone helps me to find problem source.
Kind regards.

Well, these rules are not unique – most of them are executed repeatedly for various Entities. In whole, it is a big budget calculation model.
It surely can be and must be optimized, but it will take some time (I started to administrate this outsource-developed Planning system not long ago).
But the question now is not in the amount of BRs, but in the execution delay.
I tried to run a singe rule the same way, and got _18 sec in CmdLineLauncher vs 1 sec in EAS Console_.
Just can't get the delay reason...

Newly Occuring CSS SSL Issue in Chrome, FF10, IE9 with L5 rules; 3 second delay, loss of L5 stickyness

We recently started suffering an issue with our CSS11501S-K9 units not performing URL stickiness on our SSL wrapped L5 rules. I've spent dozens of manhours working on the problem, and have quite a bit of information to report, including a solution. There is a high probability that anybody who uses SSL to an L5 rule on a CSS unit will become affected by this problem over the next few weeks/months as users update their browsers with new SSL patches.
We hadn't made any changes to our config in months, and eliminated hardware problems by testing a second unit.
Here are the exact symptoms we saw:
Browsers affected: Firefox 10, Chrome, IE9, others (and some earlier versions of IE depending on patch levels)
Browsers not affected: FireFox 3.5, w3m 0.5.2, curl7.19.7
Impact 1: For SSL Rules backed by L5 rules, the initial response to the first request would be 3 seconds. Further requests on the same TCP connection would not be delayed
Impact 2: L5 rules being accessed via SSL would nolonger perform any URL based stickiness. Accessing the same rule skipping SSL, would work fine
I focused on the 3 second delay, since that was a new issue and was easier to debug than monitoring multiple servers to see if stickiness was broken. This is what I found when a client tries to connect to an SSL rule that ultimately is routed to a L5 HTTP rule:
1. Client/CSS perform initial TLS handshake, crypto cyphers determined (nearly instantly)
2. Client sends HTTP 1.1 request for resource (nearly instantly)
3. 3 seconds of no traffic in our out of the CSS related to this request
4. CSS opens an HTTP connection to backend webserver, backend webserver responds (nearly instantly)
5. The CSS seems to route to the backend server using the balance method (round-robin) instead of the advanced-balance method (url)
6. Response is sent to the client with the resource (nearly instantly)
7. Future requests sent from the browser on the same TCP connection have no delay, but the advanced-balance continues to be ignored
The 3 seconds is quite an exact figure (within a few milliseconds) and appears to be entirely happening inside of the CSS unit itself, since it does not connect to the backend server until after the 3 seconds elapse. 3 seconds smelled like some sort of internal timeout set in the CSS unit after it gives up waiting for something.
Looking at the packets from affected browsers I discovered that the GET /foobar HTTP/1.1 request was being broken into two separate TLSv1 application messages, the first was 24 bytes and the second was 400 bytes. Decrypting these messages I found the first message was a
G
and the second message was:
ET /foobar HTTP/1.1
This essentially splits the initial request the client is sending into two pieces. This confuses wireshark so much, it doesn't decode this as a HTTP request, and just decodes it as "continuation or non-HTTP traffic".
On the working browsers I saw only one TLSv1 application message, decrypting it I saw:
GET /foobar HTTP/1.1
(obviously I'm simplifying the contents of the request, there were lots of headers and stuff)
I am aware that the CSS can't handle L5 rules appropriately if they get fragmented, so I suspected this was the problem. I pulled a packet trace from a few years ago, and at that time confirmed we never saw a double TLSv1 application messages before.
A number of openssl vulnerabilities were recently fixed: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1357-1
and browsers may have been recently updated to fix some of these issues, changing the way they encode their traffic.
Solution:
Our ssl config looked something like this:
ssl-proxy-list SSL_ACCEL
ssl-server 10 vip address XX.XX.XX.XX
ssl-server 10 rsakey XXXX
ssl-server 10 cipher rsa-with-3des-ede-cbc-sha XX.XX.XX.XX 80
ssl-server 10 cipher rsa-with-rc4-128-sha XX.XX.XX.XX 80
ssl-server 10 cipher rsa-with-rc4-128-md5 XX.XX.XX.XX 80
ssl-server 10 unclean-shutdown
ssl-server 10 rsacert XXXXXX
Removing:
ssl-server 10 cipher rsa-with-3des-ede-cbc-sha XX.XX.XX.XX 80
Solves the problem. After that's removed, the browsers will nolonger fragment the first character of their request into a separate TLSv1 message. The 3 second delay goes away, and L5 stickiness is fixed. The "CBC" in the cyper refers to Cypher-Block-Chaining (a great article here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher-block_chaining), and breaking the payload into multiple packages may have been an attempt to initialize the IV for encryption -- although I'm really just guessing, I stopped researching once I verified this solution was acceptable.
This issue became serious enough for us to notice first on Monday Feb 13th 2012. We believe a number of our large customers distributed workstation updates over the weekend. The customers affected were using IE7, although my personal IE7 test workstation did not appear to be affected. It's quite possible our customers were going through an SSL proxy. I suspect as more people upgrade their browsers, this will become a more serious issue for CSS users, and I hope this saves somebody a huge headache and problems with their production environment.
-Joe

Hi Joe,
That's a very good analysis you did.
As you already suspected, the issue comes from the TLS record fragmentation feature that was introduced in the latest browser versions to overcome a SSL vulnerability (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/864643). Unfortunately, similar issues are happening with multiple products.
For CSS, the bug tracking this issue is CSCtx68270. The development team is actively working on a fix for it, which should be available (in an interim software release, so to get it you wil have to go through TAC) in the next couple of weeks
In the meantime, as workaround, you can configure the CSS to use only RC4 cyphers (which is what you were suggesting also). These are not affected by the vulnerability, so, browsers don't apply the record fragmentation when they are in use. This workaround has been tested by several customers already, and the results seem to be very positive.
Regards
Daniel

Rule execution failed

Mailbox with rule set, very simple for this matter = if delivered after date
& if delivered before date reply with text
Sometimes it will do, other times it will NOT do the reply
And selecting a bunch of mails in Mailbox & executing the rule by hand (Run)
with Event set to User Activated (or anything else) gives error Execution
failure (really helpful!)
Anybody has an idea how to tackle it?
What is going on?
Seb

In article <[email protected]>, Eck wrote:
> One user is complaining about non-functional
> rules , which are running correctly for a while and then some of the
> rules in the set are no more executing. Rules had been completely
> deleted and recreated. After a while rules are non-functional again.
> Has anyone hints on this "feature"?
>
I would suspect something might show in a contents check for this user.
So if you follow the best practice of having one of these run for the
whole PostOffice every week or month, check the most recent one first,
and then run an additional one for the user in question. I suspect
that there is an error that isn't actually clearing, "Correctable
conditions encountered:" doesn't mean it is always truly successful in
fixing and may require some manual steps to fix.
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!

Business Rule Execution

Hi
We have a aggregation Rule which works on 3 dimensions. It was taking too much time for execution, for this we have removed number of records from 2 dimensions and the size of dimension reduced from 11000 members to 100 members. But still same business rule taking same time for execution.
Any Idea, how can we improve performance of Business Rule??
Thanks
Jiya

Hi,
It depends upon the hierarchy to be aggregated, since you have reduced the members to very few, you can do like:
1.Try to aggregate the dimension using single AGG command.
like AGG(DIM1,DIM2, DIM3) rather than writhing separate AGG commands for each dimension.
2. SET CALCPARALLEL n; for parallel calculation if you are just aggregating the dimensions.(n is the number)
Hope this works as pointers for your issue..
Thanks,
Sourabh

Failure during Remodeling Rule execution

Hi,
I created remodeling rule for InfoCube that is indexed in BI Accelerator. The rule inserts new characteristics.
Remodeling execution is failing in ACTIVATE step with "Exception in method CL_RSCNV_MANAGER:_EXECUTE_PARA LLEL_NEW-1 - ACTIVATE - Error in step -" and generating short-dump with
Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    NOT CORRECT USAGE!
    Long text of error message:
    Technical information about the message:
    Message class....... "RSD_TREX"
    Number.............. 100
    Variable 1.......... "NOT CORRECT USAGE!"
during execution of RSDDTREX_SINGLE_TABLE_INDEX.
Anyone have good insight into what this might mean?
I'd implemented note 1082769, but it did not help.
Thanks,
-Vitaliy
PS. I checked as well notes, but not much help:
926609 - BIA index and metadata changes
1012008 - BI accelerator index after activating the InfoCube

Hi,
Try this.
Monitor and Error Handling in Remodeling
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/dd/834942da51690de10000000a155106/frameset.htm
This may be of help.
Thanks,
JituK

Sequential mediator routing rules execution

Have a mediator with three routing rules executed in a sequential fashion.
The first routing rule simply writes to a file. The second does something and third does something. The third (or second) routing rule fails and supposedly all routing rules will rollback as sequential execution executes in a single thread.
Question: Does the data in the first routing rule get written out to its file?
Or does this rollback in a sequential set of routing rules apply only to a transactional routing rule - i.e. writing to a database?
Casey

Hi Casey,
According to the scenario you have mentioned, Let's say, the first routing rule writes a file, second rule inserts into a table, third rule calls a web service.
The first and second rule executes good, then if the third routing rule fails, then the second routing rule transaction will be rollback (if the data source is XA enabled) and the first routing rule which writes a file; that file will still be there, means the transaction will not be roll back.
Hope this helps,
N

Rule Execution : Error while executing a rule session unit of work

Error while executing a rule session unit of work.
The rule session CreditRule:130002 failed to execute a unit of work.
Check the underlying exception and correct the error. Contact oracle support if error is not fixable.
I have created a simple rule and using a decision service and a decide process activity I have tried to run the orchestration.
After compiling and saving and re-opening the orchestration flow looks correct.
When I execute the process I get the above error.
Is this something wrong with the Rule ?
Can anyone offer any advice
Thanks
Cliff

Hi.
Any further advice on this issue?
Getting the same problem and cannot figure out a solution.
How do I check the "underlying exception" btw?

Order of update rules execution of multiple key figures

Can anyone explain the order in which update rules execute if I have 10 key figures and defined one update routine for each key figure?

Hello GKR
This is applicable for yupdate rule as well as transfer rule
start routine executes first ( update rule/transfer routine)
In update rule the rule which u have defined first, executes first...same in transfer rule..the rule which u define first in transfer rule window executes first...
Thanks
Tripple k

Business rules execution error

Hi,
I am facing an error with business rules and forms.
We are having 6 folders and each folder relating to different departments and each department (folder) contains 5 forms.
The same environment is in UAT server and Production server.
The same UAT server is migrated to Production.
Here the problem is example: In each folder, form 2 is tagged with 3 business rules like rule1, rule2 and rule3.
These 3 rules are same for the form 2 in all folders, except the legal entity, code, prduct will be vary as per the user selection.
but the code is same.
In these 3 rules, the first 2 rules rule1 and rule2 are not working. While double clicking the rule, its says that, error while executing the calculation script. Please check the log file. The same error coming for form 2 in all folders with the same rules which are tagged.
But the same rules are working with the same form in UAT environment. I have tried to change the rules from UAT to Production.
After changing the rules also, the same error is coming while executing the business rule.
So can any one suggest me what to do and how to resolve this.
Thanks & Regards
RREDDY

The same error when executing the business rule after opening the form.
" Error executing the calculation script. Check log for details"
I have checked the log also, but its also showing the same sentence.
While validating the rule, I have checked the same thing and I have compared with the UAT settings also. Its all are fine.
Only these 2 rules with the same form in all the folders are getting the error.
I have done one more thing that copying the content of Business rule code in UAt and paste the same in Production and saved it.
I have checked all other settings they are remain same and no changes. Then I have detached the rules from web form and saved it and log-off from planning.
Again logged in and tagged the BR's to the form and tried to execute, even then also the same error coming.
thanks
rreddy
Edited by: user4483519 on Sep 21, 2009 4:39 AM

Display of data after Business Rule Execution

Hi Gurus
We are using 11.1.2 and experiencing few problems with some of out Business Rules. The problem is, BR executed successfully and the resultant data is not displaying in the target form. As a workaround, we put a dummy value in any of the target's combination and re-execute the BR, this time BR gets populate the target cell. Pls advice what sort of problem is this???
Thanks in advance,
SNK

It could be down to the business rule not creating blocks, by entering dummy data then you are creating the blocks and the rule will run as expected.
Have a look at this post :- Re: Busines rule Issue
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Error in Business Rule execution

Dear Gurus,
I have two base planning applications whihc are having lot of business rules. I have created Duplicate application for those two application by using LCM and EPMA. I have migrated each and every artefact.
I am able to see all the Business Rules in planning application and able to launch those but one business rule is giving problem.
That business rule is having 6 runtime prompts but in error it is stating only one RTP name.
The Error is - Unable to retrieve variable RTP_LAST_ACT_WK deployed in application PROPTEMP in Planning instance Default
I am clue less why the application is throwing this error.
Thanks
Giri Prasad

Hi Rahul and Endy,
I have created another duplicate application now and migrated all the artefacts and I set the default value for RTPs which i got from validation of particular business rule. Now its running fine with default instance.
The problem is i have created some more applications on different instance than the base application where the business rule validation is throwing different error.
I can stongly say that the instance is making the difference.
can you please let me know how to change the instance of existing planning applications.
Thanks
Giri

Changing Business rule execution time

Hi,
I'm working on EPMA 11.1.1.3 when i'm launching BR on dataform after certain time the dataform is opening in a new window.when i'm looking in logs it shows that
BR launching execution time has exceeded now the BR is running in the background.
can you gurus tell me where can i change the default BR execution time.....
thanks in advance
Edited by: kailash on Sep 14, 2011 4:15 PM

Have a read of - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/hp_admin/ch02s07s06.html
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Rules execution order

In rules it screen it says 'Rules are executed in the order they appear in the list.'
Is that from top to bottom or bottom to top. I had assumed it was from top to bottom.
I have setup a rule that I want to execute before another and expected rules to execute from top to bottom. I could not get to work so as a test I swapped them round and it is now working as I wanted. I can't believe the order would be from bottom to top but that is what appears to be happening for me. Or I am going mad!
Can anyone confirm (or not) this is the case.

On 2/7/2013 8:16 AM, nigelsanderson wrote:
>
> In rules it screen it says 'Rules are executed in the order they appear
> in the list.'
>
> Is that from top to bottom or bottom to top. I had assumed it was from
> top to bottom.
>
> I have setup a rule that I want to execute before another and expected
> rules to execute from top to bottom. I could not get to work so as a
> test I swapped them round and it is now working as I wanted. I can't
> believe the order would be from bottom to top but that is what appears
> to be happening for me. Or I am going mad!
>
> Can anyone confirm (or not) this is the case.
>
>
no it's supposed to be top to bottom. Remember ALL RULES get executed
unless you include a STOP PROCESSING action...

Smartview Forms - Business Rule Execution

Users edit data within Planning, but don't see changes when refreshing in SmartView until a user executes business rules {Aggregation rule} on the Plan2 cube within Planning [via internet explorer].
Once the form where the business rule is attached is loaded/saved [set to both on the form / business rule property] - the data in SmartView has the calculation updated.
Do business rules NOT run from SmartView?

buiseness rule can be executed from smart view as well but before that i would like to tell you that smart view can be connected to
1)Essbase using the URL http(s)://<servername>:13080/aps/SmartView
2)Planning using the URL http(s)://<servername>:8300/HyperionPlanning/SmartView
here 13080 is the default smart view port for Essbase and 8300 is the default port for Planning.
Now if the user makes a connection to planning then he can view the data forms and the buiseness rules but not the normal grid view that was visible otherwise in essbase.
for Forms : Hyperion tab -> Forms -> Select Forms
for HBR/Calculation Scripts : Hyperion tab -> Calculation options -> Buiseness rule
if you are connected through Essbase then you can not view the HBR and forms but if you are using the calculation scripts for aggregation then they are visible
Hyperion tab -> Calculation options -> Calculate

Rule execution is delayed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for