Running BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE over many orders takes long time

Hi,
I'm using the bapi BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE to change orders, and it works well.
I'm using this bapi to change some orders all at once. Therefore I put it into a loop.
When I run my code over all orders that created in one day, it takes about five minutes, but when I run it over all the orders that created during one week, it takes many hours.
Can someone please explain to me what the reason of it and how can I improve it?
Best Regards,
Mohamad.

Hi Prabhu,
When I run the function over about 250 SO it takes some minutes but when run it over about 2000 SO, it takes many hours.
Here is the function that update one order, I use it into a loop, and each step updating one SO.
FUNCTION Update_orders.
  DATA: header_in   LIKE bapisdh1,
            salesdocument LIKE bapivbeln-vbeln,
            header_inx LIKE  bapisdh1x,
            order_item TYPE  bapisditm,
            order_items TYPE TABLE OF bapisditm,
            order_itemx TYPE  bapisditmx,
            order_itemxs TYPE TABLE OF bapisditmx,
            retrn     LIKE bapiret2 
                             OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
            pos TYPE posnr_va,
            wa_sales_target TYPE LINE OF ysales_target_table_type.
  REFRESH: order_items, order_itemxs.
  header_inx-updateflag = 'U'.
  LOOP AT sales_target INTO wa_sales_target.
    READ TABLE pos_list INDEX sy-tabix INTO pos.
    CLEAR: order_item, order_itemx.
    order_itemx-itm_number = pos.
    order_itemx-updateflag = 'U'.
    order_itemx-prc_group4 = 'X'.
    APPEND order_itemx TO order_itemxs.
    order_item-itm_number = pos.
    order_item-prc_group4 = wa_sales_target.
    APPEND order_item TO order_items.
  ENDLOOP.
  CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE'
       EXPORTING
            salesdocument    = salesdocument
            order_header_inx = header_inx
       TABLES
            order_item_in    = order_items
            order_item_inx   = order_itemxs
            return           = retrn.
  CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
ENDFUNCTION.
Best Regards,

Similar Messages

  • The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

    Hi experts,
    The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
    I have checked the note 382329,
    -> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
    -> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
    As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
    -> OLTPSOURCE -  is blank
       PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
       PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank
    -> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
       PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
       PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
    Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
    Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
    Please suggest.

    The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
    The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the  u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
    Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
    Thanks Hope this helps ..

  • It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report

    Hi,
    It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report. What could cause this? How to troubleshoot the behavior of the report? Could I use Profile and what events should i select?
    Thanks

    Hi jori5,
    Based on my understanding, after changing the parameter, the report render very slow, right?
    In Reporting Service, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, please
    refer to this article:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    In your scenario, since you mention the query spends less time, the delay might happens during report processing and report rendering section. So you should check Executionlog3 to check which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article
    to optimize your report:
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best regards,
    Qiuyun Yu

  • NAC Agent takes long time to run

    Cisco NAC agent takes long time to popup or run on Windows 7 machine.
    The client machine is windows 7, running nac agent 4.9.0.42, against ISE 1.1.1
    Any ideas how to reduce NAC Agent timing?

    Hi Tariq,
    I'm facing the same issue with ISE 1.1.1 (268) with Agent 4.9.0.47 for Windows XP clients. I have already configured "yes" to disabled the l3 swiss delay and reduced the httpa discovery timer from 30 to 05 sec but still clients get aprox 2.30 minutes to popup and finished the posture discovery.
    Can you please advise if this is the minimum time or what is the minimum time and what are the parameters to set to a minimum time to complete agent popup and posture discovery..?
    Is there any option that we can run this on backgroup..?
    thanks in advance..

  • HT4759 Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why

    Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why I need to deactivate the space service and take my money back .. Thanks

    The "issues" you've raised are nothing to do with the iCloud service.
    No service that uploads data allows you to disconnect the device you are uploading from while uploading data. Doing so would prevent the upload from completing. It is a basic requirement for any uploading service that you remain connected to it for uploading to be possible.
    The time it takes to upload data to iCloud is entirely dependent on how fast your Internet connection is, and how much data you are uploading. Both of these things are completely out of Apple's control. Whichever upload service you use will be affected by the speed of your Internet connection.

  • Oracle9i reports take longer time while running in web

    Hi,
    I have developed few reports in Oracle9i and I am trying to run the reports in web. Running a report through report builder takes lesser time compare to running the same report in web using web.show_document. This also depends on the file size. If my report file size(.jsp file) is less than 100KB then it takes 1 minute to show the parameter form and another 1 minute to show the report output. If my file size is around 190KB then the system takes atleast 15 minutes to show the parameter form. Another 10 to 15 minutes to show the report output. I don't understand why the system takes long time to show the parameter form.
    I have a similar problem while opening the file in reports builder also. If my file size is more than 150KB then it takes more than 15 minutes to open the file.
    Could anyone please help me on this.
    Thanks, Radha

    This problem exists only with .jsp reports. I saved the reports in .rdf format and they run faster on web now. Opening a .jsp report takes longer time(file with 600KB takes atleast 2 hours) but the same report in .rdf format takes few seconds to get opened in reports builder.

  • Auto message  restart job take long time to run

    Dear all,
    I have configre the auto message restart job in sdoe_bg_job_monitor
    but it take long time to run.
    i have execute the report i have find out that it is faching records from smmw_msg_hdr .
    in the table present 67 laks records are there.
    actually it is taking a lot of time while getting data from the table
    is there any report or tcode for clearing data in the table.
    I need ur valiuble help to resolve the issue.
    Regards
    lakshman balanagu

    HI,
    If you are using oracle database you may need to run table statistics report (RSOANARA) to update the index. The system admin should be able to this.
    Regards,
    Vikas
    Edited by: Vikas Lamba on Aug 3, 2010 1:20 PM

  • BPM Process chain takes long time to process

    We have BI7, Netweaver 2004s on Oracle and SUN Solaris
    There is a process chain (BPM) which pulls data from the CRM system into BW. The scheduled time to run this chain is 0034 hrs. This chain should ideally complete before / around 0830 Hrs. <b>Now the problem is that every alternate day this chain behaves normally and gets completed well before 0830 hrs but every alternate day this chain fails…</b> there are almost 40 chains running daily. Some are event triggered (dependent with each other) or some run in parallel. In this, (BPM) process chain, usually there are 5 requests with 3 Delta and 2 full uploads (Master Data). The delta uploads finishes in 30 minutes without any issues with very few record transfers. The first full upload is from 0034 hrs to approximately 0130 hrs and the 2nd upload is from 0130 hrs to 0230 hrs. Now if the 1st upload gets delayed then the people who are initiating these chains, stop the 2nd full upload and continue it after all the process chains are completed. Now this entire BPM process chain sometimes takes 17 -18 hrs to complete!!!!!
    No other loads in CRM or BW when these process chains are running
    CRM has background jobs to push IDOCS to BW which run every 2 minutes which runs successfully
    Yesterday this chain got completed successfully (well within stipulated time) with over 33,00,000 records transferred but sometimes it has failed to transfer even 12,00,000 records!!
    Attaching a zip file, please refer the “21 to 26 Analysis screen shot.doc” from the zip file
    Within the zip file, attaching “Normal timings of daily process chains.xls” – the name explains it….
    Also within the zip file refer “BPM Infoprovider and data source screen shot.doc” please refer this file as the infopackage (page 2) which was used in the process chain is not displayed later on in page number 6 BUT CHAIN GOT SUCESSFULLY COMPLETED
    We have analyzed:--
    1)     The PSA data for BPM process chain for past few days
    2)     The info providers for BPM process chain for past few days
    3)     The ODS entries for BPM process chain for past few days
    4)     The point of failure of BPM process chain for past few days
    5)     The overall performance of all the process chains for past few days
    6)     The number of requests in BW for this process chain
    7)     The load on CRM system for past few days when this process chain ran on BW system
    As per our analysis, there are couple of things which can be fixed in the BW system:--
    1)     The partner agreement (transaction WE20) defined for the partner LS/BP3CLNT475 mentions both message types RSSEND and RSINFO: -- collect IDOCs and pack size = 1 Since the pack size = 1 will generate 1 TRFC call per IDOC, it should be changed to 10 so that less number of TRFCs will be generated thus less overhead for the BW server resulting in the increase in performance
    2)     In the definition of destination for the concerned RFC in BW (SM59), the “Technical Setting” tab says the “Load balancing” option = “No”. We are planning to make it “Yes”
    But we believe that though these changes will bring some increase in performance, this is not the root cause of the abnormal behavior of this chain as this chain runs successfully on every alternate day with approximately the same amount of load in it.
    I was not able to attach the many screen shots or the info which I had gathered during my analysis. Please advice how do I attach these files
    Best Regards,

    Hi,
    Normally  index  creation or deletion can take long time in case  your database statistics are not updated properly, so can check  stat  after your data loading is completed and index generation is done,  Do creation of database statistics.
    Then try to recheck ...
    Regards,
    Satya

  • Takes Long time for Data Loading.

    Hi All,
    Good Morning.. I am new to SDN.
    Currently i am using the datasource 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H and it contains 225 fields. Currently i am using around 40 fields in my report.
    Can i hide the remaining fields in the datasource level itself (TCODE : RSA6)
    Currently data loading takes more time to load the data from PSA to ODS (ODS 1).
    And also right now i am pulling some data from another ODS(ODS 2)(LookUP). It takes long time to update the data in Active data table of the ODS.
    Can you please suggest how to improve the performance of dataloading on this Case.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Siva.

    Hi....
    Yes...u can hide..........just Check the hide box for those fields.......R u in BI 7.0 or BW...........whatever ........is the no of records is huge?
    If so u can split the records and execute............I mean use the same IP...........just execute it with different selections.........
    Check in ST04............is there are any locks or lockwaits..........if so...........Go to SM37 >> Check whether any Long running job is there or not.........then check whether that job is progressing or not............double click on the Job >> From the Job details copy the PID..............go to ST04 .....expand the node............and check whether u r able to find that PID there or not.........
    Also check System log in SM21............and shortdumps in ST04........
    Now to improve performance...........u can try to increase the virtual memory or servers.........if possiblr........it will increase the number of work process..........since if many jobs run at a time .then there will be no free Work prrocesses to proceed........
    Regards,
    Debjani......

  • SSRS 2012. ReportServer takes long time to be up.

    SSRS 2012 Sp1
    Hi guys,
    I am using SSRS as my reporting platform, but I have always got the following issue.
    SSRS ReportServer takes time to load.
    The first time takes long, then less time but only if the ReprotServer web page is continuosly retrived.
    HERE the problem:
    If the ReprotServer page is not used after a short time (let me say 10 min), the page takes long time to be up again.
    I have checked the configuration that is set as for default 12 hours.
    Is there a way to speed up the ReportServer opening page time?
    Thanks for your help 

    Hi Fasttrack2,
    According to your description, you want to optimize the performance of your report. Right?
    In this scenario, when your report page is not active for a short time, it will take long time to render again. This is because the you have the report timeout. You can select "Do not timeout report" in Processing. Please refer to the link below:
    SQL Server Reporting Services – Timeout Settings
    For the performance issue, it can be many reason cause the report running slowly. Please refer to the articles below to optimize the report:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Query Prediction takes long time - After upgrade DB 9i to 10g

    Hi all, Thanks for all your help.
    we've got an issue in Discoverer, we are using Discoverer10g (10.1.2.2) with APPS and recently we upgraded Oracle DatBase from 9i to 10g.
    After Database upgrade, when we try to run reports in Discoverer plus taking long time for query prediction than used to be(double/triple), only for query prediction taking long time andthen takes for running query.
    Have anyone got this kind of issues seen before, could you share your ideas/thoughts that way i can ask DBA or sysadmin to change any settings at Discoverer server side
    Thanks in advance
    skat

    Hi skat
    Did you also upgrade your Discoverer from 9i to 10g or did you always have 10g?
    If you weren't always on 10g, take a look inside the EUL5_QPP_STATS table by running SELECT COUNT(*) FROM EUL5_QPP_STATS on both the old and new systems
    I suspect you may well find that there are far more records in the old system than the new one. What this table stores is the statistics for the queries that have been run before. Using those statistics is how Discoverer can estimate how long queries will take to run. If you have few statistics then for some time Discoverer will not know how long previous queries will take. Also, the statistics table used by 9i is incompatible with the one used by 10g so you can't just copy them over, just in case you were thinking about it.
    Personally, unless you absolutely rely on it, I would turn the query predictor off. You do this by editing your PREF.TXT (located on the middle tier server at $ORACLE_HOME\Discoverer|util) and change the value of QPPEnable to 0. AFter you have done this you need to run the Applypreferences script located in the same folder and then stop and start your Discoverer service. From that point on queries will no longer try to predict how long they will take and they will just start running.
    There is something else to check. Please run a query and look at the SQL. Do you by change see a database hint called NOREWRITE? If you do then this will also cause poor performance. Should you see this let me know and I will let you know how to override it.
    If you have always been on 10g and you have only upgraded your database it could be that you have not generated your database statistics for the tables that Discoverer is using. You will need to speak with your DBA to see about having the statistics generated. Without statistics, the query predictor will be very, very slow.
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Normal is takes long time

    Dear Experts, i tried to enable audit option in oracle 10.2 .0 database which is running on windows box, after set this command , i tried to restart the DB with shutdown (only) option.
    ALTER SYSTEM SET audit_trail=db SCOPE=SPFILE;
    but its takes long time to complete i checked the alert log file , its showing
    ALTER SYSTEM SET audit_trail='DB' SCOPE=SPFILE;
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:48 2012
    Starting background process EMN0
    EMN0 started with pid=29, OS id=4836
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:49 2012
    Shutting down instance: further logons disabled
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:50 2012
    Stopping background process QMNC
    Streams Apply Server P001 pid=16 OS id=3708 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:51 2012
    Stopping background process CJQ0
    Streams Apply Reader P000 pid=15 OS id=3660 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:52 2012
    Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p000_3660.trc:
    ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
    Streams Apply Server P004 pid=25 OS id=2124 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:52 2012
    Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p004_2124.trc:
    ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:53 2012
    Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p001_3708.trc:
    ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
    Streams Apply Server P002 pid=23 OS id=2404 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:53 2012
    Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p002_2404.trc:
    ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
    Streams Apply Server P003 pid=24 OS id=1372 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
    Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p003_1372.trc:
    ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
    Stopping background process MMNL
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
    Streams APPLY A001 with pid=17, OS id=3400 stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:55 2012
    Stopping background process MMON
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
    Shutting down instance (normal)
    License high water mark = 21
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
    Stopping Job queue slave processes
    Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
    Job queue slave processes stopped
    Wed Feb 01 12:28:57 2012
    Active process 2572 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    Active process 3156 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    Active process 3416 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    Active process 5596 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    Active process 5200 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    Active process 5980 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
    SHUTDOWN: waiting for logins to complete.
    Wed Feb 01 12:43:28 2012
    MMNL absent for 1203 secs; Foregrounds taking over
    there is no more info after this line..... can any one please help on this , how to solve this issue... waiting for morethan 40 mins stil is running... guide me to proceed next step to complete this.... thanks in advance

    Use anothe command prompt and type sqlplus.
    For e.g in my system.
    C:\Documents and Settings\ranjit>sqlplus
    SQLPlus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Wed Feb 1 13:46:33 2012*
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Enter user-name: sys as sysdba
    Enter password:
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
    *SQL>
    Once you saw this.. type "shu abort;"
    This will abruptly shutdown the database. It is safe to run in non production databases however. And while starting up, it will to the recovery(which may take some time again to startup database).
    Regards

  • My query take long time..

    The output of tkprof of my trace file is :
    SELECT ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY ,ENEXT.COD_BUSUN ,ENEXT.DAT_CALDE ,ENEXT.COD_SHFT
    FROM
    AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS5_VIW ENEXT ,PDS.PDS_EMPLOYEES EMPL ,
    PDS.PDS_EMPLOYMENT_TYPES EMPTYP ,PDS.PDS_PAY_CONDITIONS PAYCON WHERE
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY IN (SELECT
    ATT21 FROM APPS.GLOBAL_TEMPS WHERE ATT1 = 'PRSN') AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND EMPL.EMTYP_COD_EMTYP = EMPTYP.COD_EMTYP AND
    EMPTYP.LKP_COD_STA_PAY_EMTYP <> 3 AND
    NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1 AND EMPL.PCOND_COD_STA_PCOND
    = PAYCON.COD_STA_PCOND AND NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1
    AND PAYCON.LKP_FLG_STA_PAY_PCOND = 1 AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE >=
    EMPL.DAT_EMPLT_EMPLY AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE <= NVL(EMPL.DAT_DSMSL_EMPLY,
    TO_DATE('15001229','YYYYMMDD')) AND 1 = (CASE WHEN
    ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND
    ENEXT.TYP_DAY BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2
    AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND ENEXT.TYP_DAY NOT BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN
    1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 2
    THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    1 THEN 1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    2 THEN 0 END) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN = NVL(:B4 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN = NVL(:B3 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.COD_BUSUN = NVL(:B2 , ENEXT.COD_BUSUN)
    AND ENEXT.COD_CAL = NVL(COD_CAL, ENEXT.COD_CAL) AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    NVL(:B1 , ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY) AND ENEXT.COD_SHFT IN (SELECT
    SHFTBL.COD_SHTAB FROM AAC_SHIFT_TABLES SHFTBL WHERE
    SHFTBL.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE NOT IN (SELECT ABN.DAT
    FROM APPS.AAC_EMPL_EN_EX_ABNORMAL_VIW ABN WHERE ABN.PRSN =
    ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND ABN.DAT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 ) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    IN (SELECT EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT FROM AAC.AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS
    EMPENEXT WHERE EMPENEXT.EMPLY_NUM_PRSN_EMPLY = EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND
    EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND
    EMPENEXT.LKP_FLG_STA_ENEXT <> 3) ORDER BY ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY,
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    total 6 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?

    user13344656 wrote:
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?See PL/SQL forum FAQ
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=1535
    *3. How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow.*
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
    For instructions on what information to post an how to format it.

  • Application Load Take Long time

    Hii all,
    i has developed and adf application and oracle 9i database and deployed on a weblogic 10.3.1 using JDBC Data Source an thin Oracle Driver for service connection and then when i run the application from the intranet in the other far building the application loading takes long time and then when loaded it works good so why this long time in loading and how i can fix it or how i can trace it and know where's the problem,, hope anyone can help me because the user wait for 5 minutes to load the application and he got bored my boss will kill me..
    Regards

    Ahmed,
    Have you done any detective work yourself to find out where the long load time is coming from? Are you testing this over a slow network link? If so, have a look at section A9 [url http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31973/ap_config.htm#ADFUI10059]of this part of the documentation to see how you can perhaps reduce the initial load time.
    If it's not the network, then you can give us some more information about where the long load times are.
    John

  • My mac shutdown suddenly fr0m time to other and take long time to open

    hi everybody,
    I think i have big problem ,i have macbookpro I5 13" early 2011  , i just changed the board to I7 ( used  board got it from net ) after USB ports in my original logicboard are damaged due to drop  , after changing the board the mac is unstable, it take long time(half hour!) to show up anything after press power,  yes I press power and there are no response  from the mac (black monitor as its ) , just   i hear  a noise from the empty CD drive . once it open it work fine for a while (may 2 hours or more ) and then shutdown suddenly! and you have wait more than half hour to open it again if im lucky.
    Itried to rest the mac many times, replace the RAM places , i thought may the problem come from overheating the CPU, i monitored the CPU tempreture just before the suddenly shutdown was 57C
    please help ,any suggetions ?

    Run an Apple hardware Test:
    support.apple.com/kb/ht1509http://
    You may have to use OPTION D to start it.
    See what that picks up. 
    You may also bring the MBP to an Apple store or AASP for a diagnostic evaluation.
    Ciao.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a grace period for apple email address?

    Hey guys I was wondering if there was a grace period for apple email address yourname@'insert apple domain name'.com once you deactivate or delete it before it can be used again? for example with phone numbers for certain companies it takes 2yrs once

  • Custom table model, table sorter, and cell renderer to use hidden columns

    Hello, I'm having a hard time figuring out the best way to go about this. I currently have a JTable with an custom table model to make the cells immutable. Furthermore, I have a "hidden" column in the table model so that I can access the items select

  • Structure Authorization Issue

    Hi guys, I don't have structure authorization implemented or HR system implemented. I was playing with my sandbox system to learn structure authorization by using step by step tutorial.  After I created a structure authorization for two users I delet

  • Need to prevent invoices with 0 price line items to accounting .

    Hi All, I have a requirement where in  I need to prevent the invoices with 0 price line items to accounting if item category is relevant for pricing.The invoices which have 0 price line items and item category has specific 0 price need not to be prev

  • Platform recommendations for deploying Portal

    Ok all you Portal Mavens, I have a question you might be able to answer. We looking to implement a customer inquiry system using Oracle 9AIS Portal and we're anticipating a peak load of perhaps 5,000 users. What are we looking at in terms of hardware