RV110w firewall VPN connections

Is it possible to firewall incoming VPN connections to a specific IP address or is it "all or nothing" access? I have two internal VLANs and would like to restrict invcoming connections to only one of them.
thanks,
Wayne

There is a special embedded web server in the product that allows  firmware upgrade/downgrade when the regular firmware upgrade fails. Configure your computer to use static IP with address such as 192.168.1.100, and point your browser to 192.168.1.1.

Similar Messages

  • Copy from AFP share to AFP share (via VPN-Connection) - stupid?

    Hi there
    We set up an OS X server in a remote facility and are connecting to it over a VPN connection (Netgear Firewall).
    Everything works fine, there's only one annoying issue: if I want to copy a file from a mounted AFP share (share1) to another mounted AFP share (share2) - both of them residing on the same server - it seems to me that the files are being copied first to my local client and then back to the server again - instead of being copied directly from and to the server...
    Is there anything I can do about this issue or am I wrong? Is this a so called "feature" of the Finder itself?
    Thanks for any suggestions and regards
    Roman

    Thanks for your thoughts about higher vs. lower latency networking - I totally agree. It might be a quite uncommon setup; as the server is being "housed" in a datacenter with quite tough restrictions: not only do they charge us for the power consumption, but also for the traffic being generated - which is 250 GB a month. They're providing an uplink with 10mbps (guaranteed), burstable to 100mbits.
    Anyway, we're interested in keeping traffic low - hard to do if we cannot let end users do "common" tasks like moving files from one folder to another (of course, its a sharepoint - but they don't care).
    What I'm looking for? Well, I think it will take hours to find out which part of the setup (AFP implementation of the server, AFP on the local machines, either of them on a particular version, the Finder in general...) actually might be responsible for this behavior. And maybe there's a "solution" (if you agree that this is actually a problem" buried somewhere
    Regards
    Roman

  • ASA 5505 VPN Connection Issue

    Good morning everyone,
    At my last position I was IT Director whose area of expertise was database and application development. All of the company's networking planning and maintainence I entrusted to my sysadmin, Salvadore. Back in 2004 we began implementing major changes in the network. Salvadore recommended SonicWALL firewalls. He did a fantastic job of securing our valuable server assets. Among the many improvements Salvadore established VPN access to the datacenter assets for mobile employees. What I remember especially well was the ease-of-use: start the VPN Client then RDP to a server or connect with SQL Server, in addition to connecting to all devices on my home network. It was absolutely beautiful!
    Fast forward to today. I have since retired. I do a little bit of daytrading on the side for entertainment. I leased a dedicated server to run an application that runs continuously 24 hours a day, 5 days a week. I contacted Salvadore to do a security audit on the server. As expected the server was under constant assault by bots trying to hack the RDP port. Salvadore recommended a firewall. The datacenter host offered us two choices of Cisco firewalls, one of which we chose: ASA 5505.
    Today I have a secure server which pleases me. The one thing that bothers me however is that I lose access to my home network devices while the VPN Client is connected. Here are the symptoms:
    I cannot send an email with Outlook as I normally do by relaying off of my Internet provider's SMTP server.
    I cannot connect to the TradeStation servers with my TradeStation application using login credentials that are authorized for my home network only.
    I cannot access my Seagate network storage drive.
    This is what I discovered:
    My wireless adapter (which I use from this laptop) identifies itself as "Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection" in IPCONFIG. IPv4 address is 192.168.0.5. Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1.
    After I connect the VPN Client, IPCONFIG reports a new adapter: "Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2". IPv4 address is 10.0.10.4. Default Gateway: 10.0.10.1.
    When I launch Windows Task Manager and click on the Networking tab, I see those two adapters.
    When launch IE and go to bandwidthplace.com to run a test, I see all of the network traffic going over "Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2".
    When I disconnect VPN and then rerun the bandwidth test, I see that all of the network traffic now goes over "Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection".
    This explains all of the symptoms:
    My Internet Provider will only allow me to relay off of their email servers if I am connected to their network.
    TradeStation refuses connection to their network because my credentials do not match my network address.
    There is no Seagate network storage device on the remote server network.
    My questions to the Cisco Support Community are:
    Is this the best I can hope for?
    Must all traffic be routed through the VPN connection?
    Is there any way to route traffic destined for 10.0.*.* through VPN and everything else through the default connection?
    Thank you everyone for your help. I would be happy to provide additional detailed information.

    Hi Brian,
    you can route traffic destined to 10.0.*.* over the VPN and keep normal internet traffic unencrypted over the default connection - this setup is known as VPN Split Tunnelling.
    This doc shows how to setup the access control list and apply this to the tunnel policy.
    Hope this helps
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080702999.shtml

  • Unable to set manual IP address for VPN connection

    Recently a VPN connection with a client stopped working. They changed phone companies and changed some of the IP addresses.
    After alerting them I could no longer log in, I received the new server address which I can log in with it,
    BUT my computer is assigned a dynamic address that is already in use on their network. This causes my computer to *not* be connected to their network, even though I am inside their firewall; therefore I cannot adjust the database files I need to.
    I have tried to set the VPN (PPTP) connection TCP/IP address IPv4 manually, using the static address they just gave me. But each time I connect, [I believe] their router assigns me an address that is already in use.
    They do not use IPv6.
    Can anyone give me direction on how to make the manual IP address *stick*?
    The tech person at the site keeps telling me it is a problem with my "Mac, because with Windows.... blah, blah, blah".
    I am pretty sure this is not the case and in fact I was the one who let her know I was receiving a duplicate address.
    Your VPN expertise is really appreciated.
    Thanks in advance,
    Michele

    Hi,
    Please make sure the Ad hoc connection IP adress is at the same range with your local connection. In addition, how about recreate the ad hoc connection for test, please have a try.
    If problem persists, please use Network troubleshooter in Action Center to fix this problem for test.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • One VPN connection at a time.

    I have an issue with the Cisco 4.01 VPN client connecting more then one connection.
    I have it set to connect to the remote sight using the following parameters
    Group Authentication
    Transparent Tunneling with IPSec over UDP (Nat / Pat)
    I have also selected allow local LAN access
    I am connecting to the remote network through a Sonicwall firewall to the remote Cisco device.
    I have no problem getting connected to the remote network. All connection attempts work.
    If I have a VPN connection connected and active the next connection that is made disconnects the first one. This is repeatable and constant. So each connection is successful but it always disconnects any session that is active from that location.
    Multiple sessions are possible as long as they don’t originate from the one site. In other words workers working from home do not affect workers working from the main office.
    Any Ideas as to what may be causing this?

    just wondering what sort of cisco device we are discussing here.
    the issue maybe related to the vpn client pool.
    e.g. the pool should start with x.x.x.1, not an entire subnet.

  • VPN Connection Seen As Public Network In Windows 8.1 & No Way To Change It?

    Hello,
    I have a perfectly working VPN setup in Windows 7 however since I have got a Windows 8 computer and subsequently upgraded it to 8.1 when I connect to the VPN it assigns the connection as Public and I cannot view any of the network shares.
    As I understand it, in Windows 8 you could go into the network section of Change PC Settings, right click over the VPN and enable sharing which would convert the public network type to private however there is no longer this option to enable sharing in 8.1
    So I'm left with having to disable the public firewall and then connect to the VPN where it works perfectly but is a bit of a pain.
    I'm hoping someone can help me to change the network type of the VPN connection from Public to Private, unfortunately the laptop runs Windows 8.1 Home Premium so I do not have access to gpedit.msc
    Hope someone can help.
    Regards,
    Mike

    Hi Mike,
    Based on my knowledge, we can use the following method to change the network type of connection from Public to Private.
    Set Network to be Private in Windows 8 and 8.1 in Registry
    1.Press Win + R keys to open the Run dialog, type regedit, and press Enter.
    2.In Registry Editor, navigate to the location below:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\NetworkList\Profiles
    3.Expand Profiles, click on each long GUID number subkey, and look at its PofileName string value in the right pane to see if it has the current network name (ex: Network) until found.
    4.When you find the correct PofileName for your network name, double click/tap on the Category DWORD value in the same right pane to modify it.
    5.Type in a new Data value number for the network location you want, and click/tap on OK.
    Network location      Data value
    Public                                0
    Private                             1
    Domain                            2
    6.When finished, please reboot your computer.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Kelvin hsu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Error 720 when establishing VPN connection to RRAS server in Windows 8.1

    Hi,
    I am unable to establish a VPN connection to my Windows Server 2008 R2 RRAS server. I have tried all protocols, but always getting the same error: "Error 720: A connection to the remote computer could not be established. You might need to change
    the network settings for this connection".
    I am able to connect using another Windows 7 computer, on the same network and with exactly the same VPN parameters. So this is clearly not a problem with RRAS, the remote router or firewall and/or the local router.
    Strangely, the connection works by unchecking IPv4 and checking IPv6 in the connection properties. But I need IPv4 to work. All IPv4 settings are blank, nothing statically configured here.
    Note: This is a clean install of Windows 8.1, not an upgrade from a previous version.
    Thank you for helping me out!

    Hi,
    This behavior can occur if your computer and the RAS server don't have a protocol in common, or if RAS is not configured correctly. The error code 720 indicates no PPP control protocols configured.
    Assuming the RRAS is using, we need to make the Windows client is running PPTP too. To do this follow these steps:
    1. Right click VPN connection, and then click Properties.
    2. In the VPN Connection Properties dialog box, click the Networking tab, and make sure you have a protocol that the RAS server runing.
    If you don't have a protocol that the RAS server is running, add the needed protocol:
    1. Click install, click Protocol, and then click Add;
    2. Click the protocol that you need to install, and then click OK.
    3. Click Close in the VPN Connection Properties dialog box.
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Zone Base Forewall for VPN connections does not work after IOS upgrade

    Hi all,
    We use cisco router 2911 as corporate gateway - there is Zone Based Firewall implemented - I upgraded IOS to last version (15.2(2)T1) - originaly version 15.1(4)M1 - to solve issue with Anyconnect connections (bug CSCtx38806) but I found that after upgrade the VPN users are not able to communicate with sources in other zones.
    More specific
    WebVPN use this virtual template interface
    interface Virtual-Template100
    description Template for SSLVPN
    ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/1.100
    zone-member security INSIDE
    There are other zones VOICE, LAB, ...
    In the policy any connection is allowed (used inspection of icmp, tcp and udp) from INSIDE zone to VOICE or LAB zone
    After VPN connection I am able to reach resources in INSIDE zone (which is the most important), but not in other zones. Before upgrade it worked.
    Once I changed zone in Virtual-Template interface to VOICE, I was able to reach sources in VOICE zone but not in any other. I searched more and found the stateful firewall is not working for connections from VPN as ping is blocked by policy on returning way - it means by policy VOICE->INSIDE, once I allowed communication from "destination" zone to INSIDE zone - the connections started to work, but of cause it is not something I want to setup.
    Does anybody has the same experiance?
    Regards
    Pavel

    It seems to me I should add one importatant note - if client is connected directly in INSIDE zone, he can reach resources in other zones without any issue - so the problem is only when the client is connected by VPN - not in ZBF policy setup.
    Pavel

  • VPN connects when on LAN but not via WAN

    Hi Guys,
    I've recently configured a VPN on my SLS. I uses the following settings:
    L2TP over IPsec
    PPP Authentication: Directory Services: MS-CHAPv2
    Shared Secret: xxxxxxxxx
    Client Information:
    DNS Servers: 10.0.1.250 (my server) 10.0.1.1 (my airport extreme) - This is where I think I'm going wrong
    In my SLS firewall I've open every possible port for both L2TP, PPTP and all required directory authentication ports I believe. If there are any tricky ones please let me know
    I am able to successfully connect to the VPN and route all traffic to the delegated IP when on my local network. However when ever I'm away from that network - friends, work, and various other tested internet connections - I am unable to connect to the VPN.
    I've ruled out the SLS firewall by turning it of for several days and trying to connect at several locations. I've checked the log on the VPN and there is no record of even an attempt to connect.
    In Security of Server Preferences i have exposed the VPN on the airport extreme. I've tried both with and without port forwarding. As far as i know (correct me if I'm wrong) because I have my domain name resolving to my server then I don't need port forwarding. My DNS works for all other services on the SLS.
    Any ideas at to what I might be doing wrong? Things I could try to isolate the problem?
    Any suggestions would be very handy!
    Best
    -J

    Your Airport Extreme does not contain a DNS server.
    Ensure MobileMe is disabled at your Airport. That messes up VPN pass-through.
    From a remote network, confirm that all of the necessary ports are open via nmap or Applications > Utilities > Network Utility or other tools.
    Quadruple-check the list of ports (and preferably with a second and third technical resource), as the Apple documentation around L2TP port pass-through with Airport and Time Capsule is murky.
    Ensure that you don't have the same subnet on both ends of the VPN connection as that can interfere with IP routing.
    Also try testing with PPTP, in place of L2TP.
    I'm in the midst of tussling with a recalcitrant VPN router myself, but that's another topic.

  • Why does my L2TP VPN connection never really contact the server?

    To be clear, this configuration is not on my own Mac, but on one belonging to someone I serve with technical support.
    I am configuring an L2TP over IPSec VPN connection on a MacBook Pro. This connection is to a ZyXEL USG 300 and works successfully from my iPad. (I do not have my own OS X device from which I can test the connection.)
    To the best of my knowledge, I have entered all of the information that is needed for the connection. Yet when I try to connect, all I receive is an indication that the server did not respond. In the USG logs, there is no indication at all of there being even a connection attempt. In a Terminal session on the Mac (verbose logging is enabled), I read:
    L2TP connecting to server 'xx.xx.xxx.xx' (xx.xx.xxx.xx)...
    IPSec connection started
    IPSec connection failed
    It appears to me as if the connection never leaves the Mac and is prevented or stopped by some fault in the system. The firewall is turned off.
    What suggestions do you have for identifying the problem?

    That's weird but you should be able to manually install the update like this:
    #Download a fresh copy from [http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all/ here] - direct link (https://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-28.0-SSL&os=osx&lang=en-US)
    #Install the new version. For details, see [[How to download and install Firefox on Mac]]
    Usually this fixes this issue with automatic updates. There will be new version available starting next Tuesday. The automatic update will happen sometime over the following week or so.
    Let me know how it goes.<br>
    Thanks,<br>
    Michael

  • Two active active ISPs with load balancing, publishing and VPN connection

    Hi,
    I wonder how to enable a scenario where i have to use  two ISP's to share 30/70 load on our internet traffic, have to configure almost 60 internal websites already published using microsoft TMG firewall and connect client VPN connections and site-to-site vpn connections. I know that ASA firewall has limitation when using security contexts. Is good idea that how to achieve this gool?
    I previously tried connecting four sites running ASA devices with this fifth site running Microsoft TMG firewall but i was able to connect only two ASA firewalls using site-to-site VPN, though I was able to connect remaining two as well but last two were not able to access ASA-TMG resources. furthermore behavious of two ASA-TMG connected sites was strange: sometime i was not able to access cross site resources from one machine but was able to do so from another machine.
    I noticed that two of ASA sites connected with TMG site has different internal IP class (e.g site one 192.168.0.* and site two using 172.16.*.*) while remaining two have same class like the first site e.g 192.168.128.* and 192.168.100.*
    Did anyone has experiance connecting TMG-ASA with multiple sites within same IP class scenario?
    OR
    How to enable same features using Cisco devices as they are on a single Microsoft TMG?
    Best,
    Saulat (Contact# 0092-321-4025587)

    Sulat,
    You can load balance between the two ISPs. That is not possible. But, we do have some options that I have discussed here:
    Hope the above link gives you some ideas to utilize both your ISP links.
    -Kureli

  • VPN Connection Windows 8,1 Error

    Hello,
    I 'm trying to connect using VPN connection, but always return an error: "A request to
    send or receive data was disallowed because the socket is not connected and on a (when sending on a datagram socket using a send to call) no address was supplied"
    All my colleagues are able to connect less myself, we already sow all the configurations and seams there
    all the same, and obviously we are missing something.
    I have the windows 8.1
    Thanks

    Elsa Susana,
    Normally you’ll see the error when an incorrect network address or port is specified. 
    If you haven’t already, try pinging the remote host.  If it doesn’t respond, verify your connection information again to make sure you have the correct network address and network port entered. 
    Another possible cause is that you have the remote host blocked by your firewall or other security software, so make sure you check those as well. 
    More information on your error can also be found on
    this MSDN page.
    Hope this helps!
    Mike
    Windows Outreach Team – IT Pro

  • Cisco UC560 Not Clearing Static Routes When VPN Connections Drop

    We have a Cisco UC560 (UC560-FXO-K9) running "Cisco IOS Software, UC500 Software (UC500-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M),
    Version 15.1(2)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)"  The issue is when we have end users connecting with the Cisco VPN Client to this device sometimes we are unable to connect to any devices on our LAN or sometimes we can't connect to the LAN on the other end of our site-to-site VPN.  The one symptom I've observed when this happens is that old VPN sessions that have disconnected appear to leave static routes from the user's outside IP at their home to an IP on our LAN to a Virtual-Access interface.  When this starts to happen, I restart the firewall to clear out the stale static routes and the problem is fixed, for a while at least.  Below is the current state where we have the site-to-site VPN connected to our branch office and 2 user's connected with Cisco VPN clients.  Below that is the static route table which has 5 total Virtual-Access interface routes (one is an extra route for a user currently connected so that their outside IP is in the static route table with 2 inside IP's associated.)  Is there a way to fix the cleanup of VPN connections when they terminate?
    #sh crypto isakmp peers
    Peer: <branch office outside IP> Port: 500 Local: <firewall's outside IP>
    Phase1 id: <branch office outside IP>
    Peer: <users's outside IP #1> Port: 50420 Local: <firewall's outside IP>
    Phase1 id: EZVPN_GRP_437
    Peer: <user's outside IP #2> Port: 49345 Local: <firewall's outside IP>
    Phase1 id: EZVPN_GRP_437
    Bugsy#sh ip ro st
    Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
           D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
           N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
           E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
           i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
           ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
           o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
           + - replicated route, % - next hop override
    Gateway of last resort is <next hop of ISP for firewall> to network 0.0.0.0
    S*    0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via <next hop of ISP for firewall>
          10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 3 masks
    S        10.0.0.153/32 [1/0] via <non-connected IP of VPN user>, Virtual-Access2
    S        10.0.0.155/32 [1/0] via <non-connected IP of VPN user>, Virtual-Access2
    S        10.0.0.156/32 [1/0] via <user's outside IP #2>, Virtual-Access3
    S        10.0.0.158/32 [1/0] via <user's outside IP #1>, Virtual-Access3
    S        10.0.0.159/32 [1/0] via <user's outside IP #2 again>, Virtual-Access2
    S        10.1.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan90

    Hi Brian,
    This sounds like you are running into the following known issue:
      CSCtl03682 - EzVPN client: Several RRI routes  pointing to same virtual interface
    which is Dup'd to:
      CSCtf39056 - RRI routes not deleted
    This is fixed since 15.1(2)T4, so I would recommend upgrading to SWP 8.2 or higher.  The only other way to clean up the stuck routes is to reload the router.
    Thanks,
    Brandon

  • Certificate error when Lync client login through VPN connection

    Hello,
    I am using the certificates from internal cert authority on Lync 2013 frontend servers and on edge server internal network. Edge external is using a third part certificate.
    The users always use MS VPN connection when work remotely. We have multiple subnets in the company so "use default gateway on remote network" is enabled for routing.
    When the users try to log in Lync client from non-domain joined computers while on VPN, they can't log in and get certificate error. It is hard to import the internal certificate on the computers.
    What change do I need to do to the Lync certificates? Thanks

    You have a few options:
    1) You could attempt to hardcode the client so that it always connects through the edge.  This can be done through tools->options->personal->advanced->manual configuration (but you may have to hardcode the FQDN in your hosts file so it doesn't
    attempt to resolve via internal DNS).  This may not work since your firewall may not be too happy with "internal" traffic leaving and coming back through the edge.
    2) Write a script that helps automate the certificate installation and try to walk users through it.
    3) Bite the bullet and use a third party certificate on the internal servers.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

  • Connecting two remote LANs through a VPN connection

    1)   
    I am trying to interconnect
    two LANs as you see below.
    2)   
    The scenario is to interconnecting two LANs with a
    single domain “domain.local” in order to have
    two domain controllers backing up each other. We already have a Domain Controller “SRVDC1.domain.local” in our local network “LAN1” and another Server which is going to be as both our
    secondary domain controller and VPN Server “SRVDC3.domain.local” in our remote network “LAN2” where is the
    Netelligent Network. I am trying to make these two servers (our two LANs)
    visible to each other by a MikroTik Cloud Router Switch solution.
    3)   
    I am using a
    MikroTik Router as a PPTP Client to VPN to our
    Remote Server SRVDC3 (87.75.45.66/29).
    4)   
    All the computers in
    LAN1, including Server SRVDC1, have a gateway set on “192.168.10.1” which is a
    Asus WiFi Router as a core switch which is connected to our Fiber Optic Translator. <o:p></o:p>
    5)   
    To prevent and minimize any down-time risk during the configuration, I have isolated one computer “table2pc5.domain.local” as sample of the
    whole network; by changing its gateway set to 192.168.10.6 (the
    Ether3-Slave-Lacal-interface on the MikroTikRouter).
    I am going to replace the “Asus WiFi Router” shown in the map, by the
    MikroTik Router later, after making sure that everything would work properly, so, everything is going to be naturalized after.
    6)   
    My
    solution simply can be explained as below:
    a.   
    Providing
    another interface in addition to “Netelligent Network” adapter.
    b.   
    To
    assign a LAN-based IP (in network range 192.168.10.0/24) to the added adapter (Microsoft Virtual Adapter)
    c.   
    Configuring
    SRVDC3 in Netelligent network “LAN2” as
    a Remote Access Server (VPN Server).
    d.   
    To provide a
    MikroTik Router/Firewall on the Edge of the
    LAN1 as VPN Client.
    e.   
    Configure
    MikroTik Router VPN PPTP connection to
    SRVDC3 via the Internet.
    f.     
    To have
    two LANs connected through a permanent VPN connection.
    7)   
    IP Addresses for the three EDGE-Devices (SRVDC1
    ßàMikroTik
    Router ßàSRVDC3)
    are as below:
    a.   
    SRVDC1:
    Interface:          
    Local Area Connection
    IP Address:          
    192.168.10.2/24
    Gateway:          
    192.168.10.1/24         
    (Asus WiFi Router)
    DHCP Server Pool:          
    192.168.10.1 – 192.168.10.254 (exclusions 10.1-10.50 , 10.50-10.99 , 10.200-10.254)
    b.   
    MikroTikRouter:
    Interface:          
    Local IP          
    IP Address:     192.168.88.1/24
    Interface:          
    Ether1-gateway-master         
    IP Address:     192.168.0.1/24
    Interface:          
    Ether2-master-local               
    IP Address:     192.168.88.1/24
    Interface:          
    ether3-slave-local                  
    IP Address:     192.168.10.6/24
    DHCP Server Pool:          
    192.168.10.1 – 192.168.102.254
    c.   
    SRVDC3:
    Interface:          
    Netelligent Network                
    IP Address:     87.75.45.66/29
    Gateway: 87.75.45.65/29
    Interface:          
    Microsoft Network Adapter     
    IP Address:     192.168.10.50/24
    Gateway: 192.168.11.1
    Interface:          
    PPP Adapter RAS                  
    IP Address:     192.168.11.1/24                      
    gateway:
    8)   
    The node “table7pc2.domain.local” is not able to see<o:p></o:p>
    Now, I would ask you to help me to realise this solution by helping me to find the Bad-Routing problem, and letting me know how to fix it.
    What NAT / Rout Paths or any configuration do I need to make this two LANs visible and recognizable to each other?
    I would introduce you critical nodes which play important roles in this configuration. I have tried to colour-mark them in order to have a better recognition once you take a look at the “Ping Result” table.
    The “Ping Result” table would give you an idea which nodes are able to see which others and where does problem hide itself?

    I got my own answer :D
    1) I have to right-click on my "Routing and Remote Access" Server.
    2) on IPv4 tab, I should define a static IP Pool. I had it done before; but since that I had chosen a wide range as 192.168.11.0/24, every time the router was taking a different IP address; so I should define a very small pool with two 2
    nodes as 192.168.11.1 and 192.168.11.2. In this way, I'll have the local address (router) as 192.168.11.2 and the remote address (my remote server) as 192.168.11.1
    3) After establishment of the PPTP connection successfully, I should add an static route to the "Netelligent Network" adapter. I had it done but in the RRAS routes, so that's why it didn't work. so:
    C:\SRVDC3>_ route -p add 192.168.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.11.2
    [Enter]
    Now, I would be able to ping all of the computers whose their gateways are set on 192.168.10 (router)
    and If I wand to see all of the computers  at the first LAN, I have to put my router at the edge of the network, instead of the ASUS WiFi Router, then change it's IP address to 192.168.10.1 or alternatively set all of the computers gateways on 192.168.10.6.

Maybe you are looking for