RV110W Firmware

Had my new RV110W up and running for a couple of weeks,  F/W 1.0.0.2 seems
stable and the radio is solid.  Unit runs cool and the subdued LED brightness is nice.
A couple of suggestions for the next F/W release:
Daylight savings time setting requires entry of the dates that DST is valid.  Not good, since the dates
for DST change-over varies each year in most places.  Also, in Status > System Summary > IPv4 Configuration,
DNS 2 is shown twice.  (nitpicking, I know)

Further investigation reveals that the rv110w is behaving badly on the network.  This is after a few months of having the hardware work well together.  Substituting a new router (different manufacturer) made the network normal.

Similar Messages

  • RV110W (firmware 1.2.0.10) and bonjour

    I run all apple devices - Mac Pro x1, Mac Mini x2, iPad x3.  Recently, during the last couple of Apple update cycles I have been noticing slowdowns on wired and wireless connections through the wireless router RV110W.  Desktop machines are largely unaffected, but the iPads generally suffer slow http access and cannot stream reliably.
    An update to the latest firmware did not resolve problems.
    The log files are filled with two types of entries.
    "mDNSResponder: ERROR: getOptRdata - unknown opt 65002"
    "mDNSResponder: ERROR: getOptRdata - unknown opt 4"
    These messages seem to be related to bonjour.  I disabled Administration>Bonjour and this seems to help.  However, I want to continue using bonjour for the autoconfiguration capability.
    Any recommendations?  Is this a bug on apple or cisco's side - or both?

    Further investigation reveals that the rv110w is behaving badly on the network.  This is after a few months of having the hardware work well together.  Substituting a new router (different manufacturer) made the network normal.

  • RV110W + IPv6 Webserver Inbound access

    Model : RV110W      Firmware : 1.2.0.9
    Hi!
    I'm studying the RV110W IPv6 Firewall in the context of a long IPv6 study / Blog post ( 30+ posts yet ).
    The RV110W IPv6 Firewall got me totally puzzled.
    I've remade all the tests, and this appears :
    To allow external access to an IPv6 Web Server located on the Lan side of the RV110W, it seems that :
    creating an inbound allow rule is useless and unneeded.
    creating a Single Port Forwarding rule is compulsory and sufficient.
    1. Can anybody confirm this ?
    2. Does this IPv6 Single Port Forwarding rule actually automatically creates an ' invisible ' IPv6 Firewall allow in rule ?
    3. How comes an IPv6 Firewall allow in rule is not enough ?
    4. could anybody explain me this misterious sentence, from the RV110W admin guide :
        " Port forwarding is not appropriate for servers on the LAN, since there is a dependency on the LAN device making an outgoing connection before incomming ports are opened. Some applications require ... ... "
       What is appropriate for servers on the LAN then ? Isn't LAN the place for servers ? isn't port forwarding the historical way to make Lan servers accessible to the outside world ? This sentence seems to describe Statefull Firewall functionning, so is the sentence mistyped, and actually should be ' Port Forwarding IS appropriate for servers on the LAN, since ... " ?
    Thanks for any help
    PS. I also found an IPv6 Firewall ICMPv6 quirk, that I put on another thread

    Hi computerone1, thank you for using our forum, my name is Luis I am part of the Small business Support community.
    Well as you know Port forwarding and the Access List are different, the Port forwarding forward the port and the Access list create a rule to provide access or deny it. I this case I will recommend you to use both protocols in order provide control of the access to your server.
    I hope you find this answer useful
    Greetings,
    Luis Arias.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • IPv6 Firewall ICMPv6 quirk

    Model : RV110W      Firmware : 1.2.0.9
    Hi, I'm studying the RV110W IPv6 Firewall in the context of a long IPv6 study / Blog post ( 30+ posts yet ).
    I've found a strange quirk in the RV110W IPv6 Firewall that I can't understand.
    I've remade all the tests, and this appears :
    Creating an ICMP service using Service Management ( Protocol : ICMP )
    and using this service in an Access Rule, using any of these settings :
    Default Outbound Policy : Allow or Deny
    Action : allways allow or allways block
    Service : ICMP
    Connection type : Inbound or Outbound
    gets the Inbound TCP IPv6 Firewall fully open, TCP packets freely flowing in and out.
    As an exemple, my LAN server got all its services ( Web Server, Mail Server, ... ) useable from the outside.
    Is this a bug ?
    Can anybody confirm this ?
    ( Screenshot of two bug triggering config attached. As stated, it seems to happen whatever the rule settings )

    Dear Customer,
    Thank you for reaching the Small Business Support Community.
    Even though the firmware version 1.2.0.9 addresses some IPv6 issues, I think this is something new.  I see on the ICMPb and c gif files that both access rules actions are "always allow" but you also say to try both actions, allow and deny, with no difference.  In my opinion it is a bug and I suggest you, in order to confirm and provide a solution, to contact the Small Business Support Center directly to have one of our TAC engineers figure this out;
    https://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
    Please do not hesitate to reach me back if there is any further assistance I may assist you with in the meantime.
    Kind regards,
    Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
    Cisco Customer Support Engineer
    *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • RV110W drops PPTP connections from a Windows client (MS CHAP v2 and MPPE)

    This might be a tough problem to diagnose. I am trying to setup an RV100W for an office gateway with VPN access using PPTP. The office is located in another state, so I'm trying to do a "dry run" from home by setting up the RV110W on the local network. That is, my home network is 192.168.0.0 and I have assigned the RV110W a static IP address of 192.168.0.120 on its WAN side and a DHCP NAT internal network of 192.168.1.0. Its LAN IP is 192.168.1.2 (because of legacy limitations, the 192.168.1.1 address will be reserved for another host on the actual office network) and I set up the PPTP server on 192.168.1.3 and clients in the 192.168.1.20 to 24 range. I have enabled MPPE encryption and NetBIOS over VPN (rather important to have).
    At first, I couldn't login at all. I had an underscore (_) in the user names (of which I have setup all five) and after I changed that, I was able to connect from a Windows 7 x64 host on the home LAN (192.168.0.132). I don't know if that was the problem as I got disconnected and reconnecting was a hit-or-miss - sometimes it would work, sometimes - it wouldn't. Below is the log from the session, showing the reasons for the disconnection. When I try to connect and it gets rejected, otherwise, the reason is the same: protocol not available.
    But, first - here's the kicker. I had the exact same experience earlier with a DD-WRT router. I thought the problem lied with the amateurish firmware and that's why I decided to get the Cisco, but it seems like this might not be the problem, after all. Here is that discussion for full details: http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=149951&highlight= (to see all of the attached images and logs, you'll need an account). Briefly, with the same setup, I can establish a stable VPN connection from four Windows XP clients and one Windows 7 client, but I get the problems with two other Windows 7 clients. The Win7 clients that give me trouble can connect just fine to other PPTP VPN servers (with the built-in Microsoft PPTP client) and all three Win7 machines are clones of each other (only the hardware is different). No software firewalls, anti-virus/malware, user-permission limitations (e.g., UAC), or anything that could hamper the connections, are present on either machine.
    I don't see how the fact that the RV110W is on a LAN and not exposed to the Internet on its WAN side could cause any trouble, but even then - why some clients work fine and others - not? I would appreciate any help with this issue.
    Kamen
    This is the log from the session, showing the connection of the VPN client and then, not two minutes later, the disconnection.
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection started
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Starting call (launching pppd, opening GRE)
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: pppd 2.4.5 started by (unknown), uid 0
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: using channel 2
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Using interface ppp0
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[4583]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth chap MS-v2> <magic 0x4269dad6>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5> <pcomp> <accomp> <callback CBCP>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x0 <pcomp> <accomp> <callback CBCP>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <auth chap MS-v2> <magic 0x4269dad6>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x4269dad6]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CHAP Challenge id=0xfb <454ee20916a665999fdaa66778e1c4c5>, name = \"RV110W\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x2 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"MSRASV5.20\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x3 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"MSRAS-0-SOFTWAREONE64\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x4 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"H\\37777777772\\37777777612\\37777777633F\\177\\37777777752J\\37777777640[\\377777776451\\37777777610\\\\Ob\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x5eec49d5]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CHAP Response id=0xfb <2aeb8dac876cbec7c23036952cfc270c00000000000000006f4cafa17228047ac82f26e47ae69eda8fe8650d5866e44b00>, name = \"sakor001\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[4583]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/chap-secrets has world and/or group access
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CHAP Success id=0xfb \"S=ACBA0BE9B8A98DDB757B234A1C69E9508DE169DE M=Access granted\"]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up started (pid 4587)
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mppe +H -M +S +L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up finished (pid 4587), status = 0x16
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x5 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x5 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x6 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP TermAck id=0x6]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 192.168.1.3>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <addr 192.168.1.3>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x7 <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x8 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x9 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: local  IP address 192.168.1.3
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: remote IP address 192.168.1.20
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up started (pid 4661)
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 4661), status = 0x0
    2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W user.debug syslog: Nbsrelay start (pid= 4678)
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Modem hangup
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down started (pid 4858)
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Connect time 1.5 minutes.
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Sent 10404 bytes, received 17264 bytes.
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down started (pid 4861)
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pppd[4583]: MPPE disabled
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 \"MPPE disabled\"]
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Connection terminated.
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down finished (pid 4858), status = 0x16
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Waiting for 1 child processes...
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]:   script /tmp/ppp/ip-down, pid 4861
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 4861), status = 0x0
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Exit.
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[4582]: GRE: read(fd=11,buffer=449be4,len=8260) from network failed: status = -1 error = Protocol not available
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[4582]: CTRL: GRE read or PTY write failed (gre,pty)=(11,10)
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[4583]
    2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection finished

    Update: things are getting even weirder. In short - it seems to be working now (on the next day) without anything changing. First thing I did was just try another desperate tweak - I disabled the LCP extensions on the Windows client, which I've done before. It connected and stayed that way. Then, I reverted that setting back to exactly how it was before and connected again - no problems: it stayed connected for an hour (before I disconnected so I can connect to the real VPN), I could access a test-PC on the private network (a single machine just for the test) and do different tasks (resolve host names, browse UNC paths, copy files, Remote Desktop to it, etc.)
    I hate it when things happen, for which there is no explanation. I couldn't be confident sending this to the main office to replace the existing router (hardware) and VPN server (implemented in software on a Windows 2003 server). Any thoughts?
    Kamen
    P.S. I'm attaching the logs from the successful session in case someone wants to compare them, but they seems quite identical (some different ConfAck / ConfNak  sequences, but that doesn't seem to make much difference).
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection started
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Starting call (launching pppd, opening GRE)
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: pppd 2.4.5 started by (unknown), uid 0
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: using channel 5
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Using interface ppp0
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[946]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x0 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x11372b0b]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CHAP Challenge id=0x66 <74f93b7b6de315aaaac930f984c219e4>, name = \"RV110W\"]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x2 magic=0x67c80cba \"MSRASV5.20\"]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x3 magic=0x67c80cba \"MSRAS-0-SOFTWAREONE64\"]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x4 magic=0x67c80cba \"
    \\37777777675\\027\\37777777665\\004\\37777777635\\37777777677@H\\37777777633~\\37777777775\\021\\tFQ(\
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x67c80cba]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CHAP Response id=0x66 <2f0330cb61ba1c8e29324410e0df24d3000000000000000025d1ef07d4cd82beaa93fe36ccc1e863b2652087eb02c39400>, name = \"sakor001\"]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[946]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/chap-secrets has world and/or group access
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CHAP Success id=0x66 \"S=9A5FB4C8B7C633FD6DEB868E150D0511BD93E0B4 M=Access granted\"]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up started (pid 949)
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up finished (pid 949), status = 0x16
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x5 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfNak id=0x5 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x6 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP TermAck id=0x6]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x7 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x7 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x8 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x9 ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xa ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0xa ]
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: local  IP address 192.168.1.3
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: remote IP address 192.168.1.20
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up started (pid 1028)
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 1028), status = 0x0
    2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W user.debug syslog: Nbsrelay start (pid= 1040)
    2012-02-23 10:17:56 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[944]: GRE: Bad checksum from pppd.
    2012-02-23 10:31:51 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd[807]: received INFORM from 00:13:46:E6:D3:FA
    2012-02-23 10:48:20 RV110W daemon.info httpd[376]: Administrator session timeout.
    2012-02-23 10:48:27 RV110W daemon.info httpd[376]: Administrator logined from 192.168.0.132
    2012-02-23 10:52:50 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd[807]: received INFORM from 00:26:F2:B7:49:42
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0xb \"g\\37777777710\\014\\37777777672\\000<
    \\37777777715t\\000\\000\\000\\000\
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: LCP terminated by peer (gM-H^LM-:^@
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down started (pid 6011)
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Connect time 57.4 minutes.
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Sent 272072987 bytes, received 6264878 bytes.
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down started (pid 6015)
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0xb]
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down finished (pid 6011), status = 0x16
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Modem hangup
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Connection terminated.
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Waiting for 1 child processes...
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]:   script /tmp/ppp/ip-down, pid 6015
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 6015), status = 0x0
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Exit.
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pptpd[944]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[946]
    2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection finished

  • RV110W issues with VOIP service

    Hi
    I'm new to the forum and tearing my hair out here. We have an RV110W with a mix of computers and VOIP handsets.
    Strange thing is that after 16 minutes of a VOIP call, the port seems to get swapped and the call hangs.
    The VOIP provider, who is pretty worthless by the way - don't use Vivo Telecommunications - has decided that the problem resides at the firewall, They say:
    The port swapping will be caused by the firewall, there are 1 of 2 causes: SIP Awareness; there are several things that can affect this most firewalls have SIP Alg but it can be disabled, also the NAT refresh time needs to be set correctly.
    They have suggested some commands to apply -
    Cisco PIX firewall – run the command “no fixup protocol sip 5060”
    Cisco ASA 7.2+ – run the command “no inspect sip”
    Has anyone else seen this issue?
    If so and you think these commands might work, can someone point me to the correct way to do that? I am really only used to dealing with the web-based UI to configure the firewall.
    Thanks
    Stephen

    Stephen
    The router has no settings for that. Make sure you have the latest firmware installed, there may have been an issue with the older firmware(s).
    If the router is causing the issue then it has a bug. If you have another router, try it and see if you get the same result. If not, connect a VoIP handset directly to the ISP and make a call. If it breaks after 16 minutes, you know that the issue is with the ISP or VoIP provider, not the router. Another option is to disconnect everything from the RV110W (for security) except for a VoIP handset. Turn the firewall off on the router and try a call.
    If you find that the problem is in fact caused by the RV110W, please open a case:
    www.cisco.com/go/sbsc
    - Marty

  • RV110W excessive syslog messages

    I bought a RV110W wireless router a couple months ago that I've been pretty happy with.
    However, I have one significant problem with it.  It is configured to send syslog messages to an internal server.  Twice now it has gone into a mode where it starts dumping messages like,
      ip_conntrack_is_ipc_allowed: ipc_entry_is_full
    continuously, at a rate of about 20 per second.  It otherwise seems to function normally, but of course if unnoticed my syslog file quickly grows to hundreds or thousands of megabytes.  A reboot restores normal operation.  It is running firmware 1.1.0.9.  A search on the internet turned up no information about this problem. 
    It may be some corruption is occuring in the router's OS, or perhaps this is something that can be triggered externally (in which case it would be a weak form of DoS attack?  Or maybe worse if in this state it is unable to properly apply the firewall rules.)
    Looking for some hints on what might be wrong and how to fix.

    I have also experieced the same issue.  I did not reboot the Wireless Router but the logging has seemed to stop.  I'm not sure what caused it either.  I did clear the log and it has not been logging the error "ip_conntrack_is_ipc_allowed: ipc_entry_is_full".
    I would like a response from Cisco on this error.  How do we get Cisco to respond?

  • RV110W ipv6 dies randomly

    My RV110W works fine for ipv6 from 1 to 4 days, then stops working.  A reboot fixes it, then it happens again, etc.  The ipv4 is never affected.  I try using ipv6.google.com and that lets me know if it's working.
    This has happened since day one.  I've upgraded firmware twice and now am at 1.2.0.10.  I wiped the config, as recommended, but that's not the problem.  I don't have some tricky custom setup.
    There is no specific message to indicate what's happening.  If I leave logging enabled, it fills up with page after page of:
    RV110W kern.err ICMPv6 RA: ndisc_router_discovery() failed to add default route
    Despite this message, I can browse to ipv6 sites with all my connected computers when it's working.  Those would have Windows 7, XP, or OpenBSD, FWIW.
    You might want to blame Time Warner cable, or my SB6141 modem, but I tried a Netgear N300 router for a couple weeks without a single hiccup.  That points the finger at the RV110W.  Since ipv4 works, I think the hardware is OK.
    I don't see this bug listed when I search.  Honestly, I have little hope that Cisco, or whoever, will ever fix it.  If I'm missing something simple, let me know.  Thanks.

    I forgot to mention explicitly that it's set up ipv4+ipv6 on LAN and WAN sides.  DW

  • RV110w wont connect with dsl modem for VPN - HELP!

    Hello,
    I have bought a RV110w and also a D-Link 320B modem  (replacing my standard Sky broadband router) and I am having difficulty  setting them up.  The D-Link modem works when connected directly with my  laptop via ethernet but when connected into the WAN port on the RV110w  none of the computers on my network have internet access.  The RV110w  dashboard says that the WAN connection is "UP" and gives an IP  address??  Any help with this would be much appreciated.
    After  the above issue has been solved I would then like to use the RV110w VPN  facility which I have been unable to set up correcty using QuickVPN.   The laptop that I want as a VPN client is running Windows 8.
    I have been trying to sort this for two weeks with no luck!!!
    Matt.

    Hi Matthew, thank you for using our forum, my name is Luis I am part of the Small business Support community. I apologize for your inconvenience; I have a couple of questions, what firmware are you running? The last firmware is 1.2.0.9 and you could download it here, are the computer connected to the RV110W receiving DHCP?
    I want to have this information in order to provide better assistance.
    Also I will share an article for QuickVPN, here you will find the configuration for your QuickVPN
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29399
    I hope you find this answer useful
    Greetings,
    Luis Arias.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • RV110W port forwarding

    Hello,
    I have new RV110W with firmware 1.1.0.9, which is set to gateway operating mode and I have problem with port forwarding on LAN. I have web server in LAN with services on different ports and static public IP on WAN port and set port forwarding on RV110W firewall in port range forwarding. From Internet everything works fine, but when I try connect to server with public IP,that I have set on WAN port, from LAN, it´s not work. Please can you tell me whether it is a standard feature or I have some errors in configuration or it´s firmware bug? Thanks for your answers.

    Hi Petr
    this feature is called NAT Redirection (possibility to access local resource from local (same) network by external IP address) and is usually disabled by default for security reasons. You can find pretty good explanation here:
    http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10449610
    Try to add new rule to router´s Firewall // Access Rules.
    Regards,
    Abudef

  • Router RV110W - Log (warning): COEX: downgraded chanspec 0x2d08 to 0x2b06: channel 3 used by exiting BSSs

    Dear Sir or Madam,
    Geehrte Teilnehmer dieses Forums,
    --- English version below ---
    Ich habe heute meinen Router RV110W in Betrieb genommen und konfiguriert. Neben WAN und LAN habe ich WLAN konfiguriert und die aktuelle Firmware aufgespielt, alles andere ist auf den Werkseinstellungen. Im Logfile sehe ich unten stehende Warnings. Ich vermute, dass die ursprüngliche Fehlerursache die "warning COEX" ist, unter diesem Suchbegriff kann ich jedoch keine Einträge in diesem Forum finden. Meine Frage lautet: was ist hier falsch und wie kann ich dies beheben.
    Vielen Dank und mit freundlichen Grüßen
    --- English version ---
    Today I've configured my new Router RV110W. I've configured WAN, LAN and WLAN, all the "rest" are default / factory settings. I also updated to the actual firmware version. Within the logfile I found following warnings (see below). I suggest, the causal cause of error is the "warning COED" entry. Using this search criterion I didn't find any thread within this forum. My question is: What happend (what is going wrong) and how to solve it?
    Regards
    Logfile
    1     2012-01-06 8:55:37 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 STA xxx associated with BSSID xxx
    2     2012-01-06 8:55:37 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 Assoc request from xxx BSSID xxx
    3     2012-01-06 8:55:22 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 STA xxx associated with BSSID xxx
    4     2012-01-06 8:55:22 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 Assoc request from xxx BSSID xxx
    5     2012-01-06 7:47:51 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 STA xxx associated with BSSID xxx
    6     2012-01-06 7:47:51 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 Assoc request from xxx BSSID xxx
    7     2012-01-06 7:47:37 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 STA xxx associated with BSSID xxx
    8     2012-01-06 7:47:36 PM     warning     [K_WL.info]wlan0(): IEEE 802.11 Assoc request from xxx BSSID xxx
    9     2012-01-06 6:13:40 PM     warning     COEX: downgraded chanspec 0x2d08 to 0x2b06: channel 3 used by exiting BSSs
    10     2012-01-06 6:13:30 PM     warning     COEX: downgraded chanspec 0x2d08 to 0x2b06: channel 3 used by exiting BSSs

    Has someone an idea how to get into the system of the iPod, that i am able to see what he is doing?
    I already tried to works with XCode, but not able to connect to my device.
    Also worked with the iPhone Utility, nevertheless a bit helpful.
    Or a hint, how to destroy my actual firmware and to set up a new one, means setting up a completely (brand) new iPod like i bought it at the store?!
    Support can not help me any more because my warranty is over ince 2 days.
    Thank you

  • RV110W port 443 always open

    I just bought and setup a RV110W. I noticed while scanning it from the WAN side that it always has port 443 open, even when remote management and VPN access are disabled. Why is this port still open, and how do I close it? Or is this a bug in the firmware? I am using firmware version 1.1.0.9, which is the most up-to-date for this unit. Having open ports allowing unsolicited contact from the WAN side, especially inadvertant ones, is a major security hole.
    I should be able to lock this down with no open ports on the WAN side. Any idea why this unit is doing this? Should I return this device, or is this fixable?

    I've upgraded to 1.2.0.9. The Cisco support site search top link that points to what it claims is the latest the firmware, displayed 1.1.0.9 as the most up-to-date. You have to notice the left hand column has a higher version number listed. See here.
    Once I did that firmware upgrade, the 443 port appearing open on the WAN side for unsolicited connections went away. The tool I used for probing was just Shields Up!. It's a pretty basic port scanner that probes for acceptance of unsolicited connections from external IP address 4.79.142.202 over a range of ports, typically ports 0-1055.
    I don't buy the "blame it on the modem" explanation, if for no other reason than in this router replacement, the modem wasn't changed and the previous router always showed no ports open for unsolicited connections in the port ranges I probed except when port forwarding was activated. I've not turned on any port forwarding (nor remote WAN-side admin access nor VPN access) on this RV110W for these tests.
    Anyway, for whatever reason, the issue seems to have gone away with this firmware version.
    BTW, the one complaint I have with the RV110W design (or any of its Cisco cousins) is the lack of SMA connectors for the antennas, so one is stuck using the antennas on the unit. My old router had vastly better coverage because I was able to replace it's antennas with external antennas which I could use to tailor the shape of the coverage area to the local. (e.g. D-Link ANT24-0700 omnidirectional antenna, Hawking HAI15SC corner antenna, etc) I hope I don't find I need to put this unit on eBay in a month and replace it with one with detachable antennas just to get adiquate coverage in the shape I need.

  • Macbook4,1 10.6.8 and firmware update - what went wrong?

    Macbook 4,1 2008 2.4Ghz (not unibody). I recently reformatted my hard drive and reinstalled 10.6 from the Retail DVD and all seemed to go well. The MB was working fine up to that point. I then set up the MB (network, date and time, etc.) and repaired permissions.
    I then checked Software Update and downloaded and installed the recommended updates to 10.6.8.
    Again, all seemed to go fine. System booted and I repaired Permissions again. I went to the Apple web site, a couple of other web sites, and Software Update found another update to install: Firmware. Though I don't remember what version.
    I clicked OK and it installed.
    Upon reboot, it seemed to install okay.
    But then I left the Macbook and it went into Sleep.
    I didn't come back to it again until the next day.
    When I pressed a key to wake it, I got what I now know is the screen that appears after you wake it from SAFE SLEEP. As per this Apple KB article: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1757.
    And this is where the problems started.
    After the MB woke to the Safe Sleep screen, which shows the desktop a little "out of focus", the progress bars started filling in from left to right, BUT before they completed, the screen went BLACK.
    And it has had a problem with black screen ever since. I can boot the MB from internal or external HD or from DVD, and it seems to boot fine. Boot chime, Apple logo, spinning wheel, then at the point where it pauses, blue screen, then goes to desktop, instead the screen goes black.
    It finishes booting, but seems to go into Sleep.
    I can wake it by pressing a key, but the screen either comes on and goes black again after 10 seconds, or I get the Safe Sleep wake screen, and then it goes black after 10 seconds.
    And at boot or when waking the MB, the front LED flashes 5 times. There are no error beeps.
    I've tried changing RAM, but problems remain.
    So what's all this? Any ideas?
    The display doesn't seem dead, as it works to boot and wake. The MB works fine with external monitor.
    It's weird, but I can't think of anything apart from the Firmware update. The problems started right after installing it.
    Unfortunately, this model of Macbook doesn't have a Firmware Restoration image to download and burn to CD. It is the ONLY Mac at this point that doesn't have this!
    I called Apple support and even bought the 49 Euro Pay Per Incident service, which proved to be the same as throwing 49 Euro out the window. The only "technical" support they provided was to Reset the SMC, which you can find out about FOR FREE at the Apple website. And which I'd done anyway. I'd also reinstalled the MacOS. Don't want to beef too much, but sheesh, you've already got a Macbook that might need costly repairs, and they make you pay 49 Euro BEFORE they even ask you about the problem and what you've done to try to solve it. I'm tempted to say "ripoff". I mean, if all they can offer you is the advice to reset the SMC - which Apple offers for free at their website - then that's pretty poor service for 49 Euro, to say the least.
    Apart from the wasted 49 Euro, I'm pretty peeved about the Firmware update (or so it seems) wrecking a perfectly working 2008 Macbook. I don't know how to convince Apple of this, but I'm certainly going to try.

    Thanks for the reply.
    Re. the Displays setting, the Macbook display isn't recognized and mirroring isn't an available option.
    I've scoured the net and the idea of replacing the PRAM battery may be something to try. I read a post by a guy with a Macbook logic board screwed up by a Firmware update, which he solved by replacing the PRAM battery, as when you disconnect it you reset the logic board.
    Which capacitor?
    No luck so far with talking to Apple. I will try to get hold of someone a little more tech savvy and/or in a position of authority, as it seems that the Firmware is the culprit. Obviously a million other things could go wrong with a Macbook, but given the timing here it looks like the Firmware. Firmware updates can and occasionally do screw up a computer, as most manufacturers will warn you before you apply the update: PC makers, printer makers, etc. And they probably warn you that it's all your responsibility if anything goes wrong. But re. the Apple Firmware update:
    1) it came thru Software Update
    2) there was no warning
    3) to make things worse, there's no Firmware Restoration image that I can burn to a CD to reflash the logic board: this is the only Apple computer that doesn't have a Firmware Restoration option
    I'll try to get thru to a manager and convince him/her that the firmware may have been the cause.
    Do you think an authorized Apple tech might have access to some way to do a firmware restoration? Something not avaiable to mere mortals? Because if not, the only solution looks like a new logic board.

  • New symptoms since latest firmware update

    OK I have a 1tb sky hd box which hasn't had any really annoying issues up until the new firmware update (the one with the new Kids tile which is annoying in its own right).  Anyway, I have been watching the cricket on SS2 and every so often when they break for a short advert between overs I've lost sound when it tries to revert to DD5.1 after switching from 2.0 on the adverts.  I have to change channel and back again to get the sound back.    Also, for the first time, my planner was showing empty today so I had to do a planner rebuild which solved the issue.  Still, at least they  seem to have solved the sound dropout issue.  So just heads up for anyone else with a 1tb box who experiences the same issues.

    (Quoting Karl Petersen here:)
    There's a bug in iMovie 6 that makes it impossible to re-edit (Update) photo clips previously imported with the Ken Burns checkbox ON. The source photo, normally stored in the Media folder of the project, is (inappropriately) discarded when you empty the iMovie trash. The clips Update as black clips and the preview is usually black too, if I recall.
    The workaround is to 1) drag the photo from the iMovie trash to the iMovie Clips pane; or 2) never empty the iMovie trash.
    Sue

  • New to the WRT300N - Firmware & help needed

    Hi. First off, I apologize that this is going to be very long.  I really hope someone will take the time to read it all and give me some help.
    I posted about a week ago about problems with my WRT54GS.  All of a sudden with no changes, the wireless stopped working.  I tried for a few days to fix it with no luck.  I decided to order the WRT300N (I figured if I was going to buy a new one, I'd upgrade and this is the one that Linksys recommended).
    I should mention that after ordering the new router, the wireless on the old one started working again but it wasn't working normal.  The signal quality had always pretty much been excellent and now it started going up & down but at least it was staying connected.
    The new router came today.  I disconnected the old one and connected the new one and everything went smoothly.  Both my wired & wireless computers worked great.  Less than an hour later, the wireless disconnected.  I went to view available networks and my network (I use our last name) was gone.  I shut off the laptop and it still didn't see the network.  So I started looking at the router settings just to be sure that nothing had changed.  About 15 minutes later, the laptop found the network and connected again.  The signal quality dropped to good and has stayed there ever since.
    Just for information, when the laptop is on the desk (which it is 90% of the time), it's only about 5 feet away from the router.  I have not tried to take the laptop out of the room yet.  Also more information if it helps.  I have a large "U" shaped desk.  My monitor for my desktop sits in the middle.  On either side are the speakers.  To my left (in front of me) is a UPS (plugged into this UPS is the tower, monitor, speakers, cradle for my mouse, modem & router), then the tower (I can't put it on the floor because I have physical issues that would prevent me from accessing it there).  Now if I turn my chair to the left, the desk has an upper level.  This is where my DSL modem & the router are.  They are on the end near where the computer is on the lower level.  This is the same setup we were using before.  Old router worked great for almost 2 years with signal strength at excellant on the laptop.  It just started acting up all of a sudden.  If I go back to facing center and then turn to the right, that's where my husband's laptop sits.  The only other equipment there is a calculator and a lamp and on the floor is another UPS which has his laptop (which has an Intel wireless G card in it), a laser printer, and the above mentioned calculator & lamp plugged in.
    Prior to today, I had the Logitech MX3100 keyboard & mouse set.  I had purchased a new mouse (Logitech MX Revolution).  So I was using the keyboard from the MX3100 with the new mouse and everything was fine running that way for weeks before the problem kicked in.  So I don't think it's got anything to do with the mouse.  Today's setup is a little different.  I am no longer using the MX3100 keyboard.  I am using Logitech DiNovo Edge, which uses a bluetooth dongle.  I also don't think it's any interference from this keyboard since this is a pre-existing problem.
    I do have a cordless phone in the room (it's on the left hand side of the desk from where I sit at the opposite end from the modem & router...also it's one of those that doesn't need a phone line)but it's a 5.8 ghz.
    The old router had the option to change the channel, etc.  This one has auto for standard channel & wide channel & there's no way to change it that I can see.  Radio band is also set to auto but does have 2 choices under it (standard & wide).  As I said before, I use our last name for our SSID.  It's the same one I've been using for years.  There is no one else around here with that SSID.  Network mode is mixed.
    Concerning the firmware....the information for mine is WRT300N V1.1 firmware v1.51.2.  I tried to look for an update but the only one in the list is the WRT300N V1.0.  I did click on that but the firmware version is lower and I don't want to screw anything up.  Is there a firmware update for me or not?  If so, please point me in the right direction as I can't find it.
    Concerning the signal strength....would it help to buy a new wireless card for the laptop?  The Intel card has been updated with the newest software.  The card is internal and to my knowledge can only be replaced with the same card or a bluetooth card.  (Computer is a Dell XPS M140.)  I do have a card slot but I'm confused because I think Dell called it an Express Card slot and I don't know whether or not the Linksys notebook card that is recommended for this router would work in this slot.  If the card would work, is it worth the expense?
    What else can I try.  I thought about moving the router furthur to the left but it would require moving a few other items and I'm not sure if the cords are long enough.  Would it help if the router & modem were not plugged into the same UPS?  I do have a regular surge protecter near where my phone is.  I would really rather leave them plugged into the UPS though for obvious reasons.
    Also if it helps, I have the router on it's side with the 2 antennas on the end pointing straight up and the flat one in the middle I have angled this way.
    I hope I have given enough information for some suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Lisa

    Thanks for the response.  I was wondering if anyone would take the time to read such a long post.  I wanted to be sure to try to give as much information as possible.
    My desktop (Dell XPS400) tower is made out of metal...but the router is actually not sitting on it.  There is a shelf to the left of my tower (when I'm facing it, otherwise it's to the right of it).  That's where the modem & router sit.  The shelf sits about 3" over from the edge of the computer and it's about 7" above it.
    As far as the wireless card for my husband's laptop...I'm still thinking about it.  I'm wondering if there would be any improvement in speed or the quality of the connection with the N card.
    Now I just went into the router's settings and tried to make the changes you suggested.  I was able to change  the radio band from auto to wide BUT once I do that, I loose the ability to leave the wide channel & standard channels on auto.  The options for the wide channel are 3-9 and the standard are 1 & 5.  I don't know which ones are best to pick so for now I'm not changing anything.  I didn't change the advanced settings either as I wasn't sure if I could do that without changing the other settings first.
    My husband has noted that he does see the quality of the connection occasionally jump to excellant.  For the most part it's staying on good in here.  We haven't brought it out into the living room yet to see what it does out there.  He hasn't needed to.  He has had it disconnect on him a couple of times as well.
    I did forgot to mention in that book I wrote that we do live in an apartment building.  We are on the 1st floor in the back of the building.  Our office is between our living room & another bedroom.  There is an apartment above us.  There is another apartment on the other side of the other bedroom.  Our bathroom is across the hall from this room, other side of that is the kitchen and then there is an apartment in the front of the building.  Our front door is off the living room, a hallway seperates our apartment from another one.  There are 4 apartments on each floor.  Laundry (directly under us) & storage in basement.
    I give all these details to try to get the best help.  I don't know if all this extra info is helpful or not.  We have been using Linksys routers for quite a few years now.  This is our 3rd one and our 2nd wireless one.  We have been in this apartment for a year now and had no trouble until a few weeks ago.  Previously lived in another apartment of the same floor plan in the same complex but on the 3rd floor (boy did we hate walking up those stairs!) with no trouble.
    Looking forward to hearing back from  you so I can try to make the changes you suggested.
    Thanks,
    Lisa

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I separate one column into multiple column?

    How can I separate one column into multiple column? This is what I have: BUYER_ID ATTRIBUTE_NAME ATTRIBUTE_VALUE 0001 PHONE_NUMBER 555-555-0001 0001 EMAIL [email protected] 0001 CURRENCY USD 0002 PHONE_NUMBER 555-555-0002 0002 EMAIL [email protected]

  • Implementation of ws-secureconversation in webservice

    I have to implement a message level secured webservice which wud cater to client on .NET. We have weblogic 10.3.6. Through the tutorials i have configured my server with "weblogic.wsee.security.wssc.v13.sct.ServerSCCredentialProvider" , "weblogic.wse

  • Error while using rowrepeater.

    Hi, I am getting the following error "Dynamic type conflict when assigning references " when I am trying to run a simple webdynpro application I have created for learning purposes. Has the error got to do something with the binding of the rowrepeater

  • SAP JVM switch SAPINST GUI not launching

    Hi All, I have performed SAP JVM switch in all portal servers. One of the server is giving issue. I is not launching sapinst GUI screen. There was 2 JDK versions installed j2sdk1.4.2_13 and j2sdk1.4.2_29. I keep tried changing j2sdk1.4.2_29 in some p

  • Standby dtabase archivelog status

    I have noticed that archived log status (applied or not) and PROTECTION_MODE,PROTECTION_LEVEL (both form V$ views) are different on standby database and on primary database what is the reason and what is the impact to the system of tease differences