RVM Multi-User Installation Help

I am trying to follow this wiki guide on installing RVM for Multi-Users.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RV … stallation
The problem is after I add myself to the rvm group using
$ sudo usermod -a -G rvm <user>
Then I log out and back in, but there is no ~/.bash_login file.
The next step is to change the line
[ [ -s $HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm ] ] && source $HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm to the system-wide location changing $HOME to /usr/local/
but I can't because there is no ~/.bash_login file.

Reread the page again, the instructions are quite clear:
After the script has finished, then add the following line to the end of your ~/.bash_login or ~/.bashrc (or ~/.zprofile or whatever)
You should also read the bash page to get an understanding of the various files in the shell initialization process:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bash#Invocation

Similar Messages

Diff bet multi user and single user installation

Hi,
what is the diff betweeen single user and multi user installation,please let me know advantages and disadvantages also .
Regards

Hi,
what is the diff betweeen single user and multi user installationSingle user installation is having one user who owns all the application/database tier files. When you do an installation, you run RapidWiz as this user.
Multi-user installation is having two different users (applmgr user who owns the application tier files, and oracle user who owns the database tier files). When you do the installation, you run RapidWiz as root user.
On Windows, you cannot have multi-user installation. So, the above is valid on Unix/Linux.
More details can be found in the Concept manual --> http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/applications.html
please let me know advantages and disadvantages also .I always prefer multi-user installation as you just source the application/env file in the user's profile (in the applmgr/oracle profile) and the file is sourced once you login as that user. For single user installation, you will have to be sure that you source the proper env file manually each time you want to switch between the application and the database (just imagine if you try to shutdown/startup the database after sourcing the application env file, or trying to use any database executable file like export/import/sqlplus ..etc, you will end up using the application tier executable files).
Regards,
Hussein

UPK11 - multi-user environment - manage author permissions - help

We are configuring our UPK 11 multi-user environment.
As we have it set, the "everyone" group has modify access to all folders.
I would like to have a few admins have modify access to the system folder and everyone else be read only.
Here's my dilemma -
My admin profile is also a part of the everyone group - so if I set the permissions on the everyone group to read only, that effects the admin login as well.
The documentation says that if I set up an author with explicit folder permissions, that they are not included in the everyone group, but everytime I try, they are added (irrevocably) to the everyone group before I can even assign an explicit permission.
I tried to set the everyone group to read only and nearly hobbled my admin account.
Can someone who has managed authors in a UPK 11 multii-user environment send out some tips?
I'm not understanding the documentation well enough to make headway.
[email protected]

Hi Paul,
I recently performed an implementation of UPK 11 at a client and had to show one of their employees how to administer the security surrounding profiles and authors.
The group "Everyone" is default, and each person will belong to that group. It seems that when a person is assigned to another group/with author-specific permissions, it will override that which is set to the "Everyone" group.
What I normally suggest (and implement) is that you modularise your security (separate the authors into their respective departments), and then create those departments as groups, and then assign permissions as required. Lets use an example - it assumes you are logged in as an admin user:
I create 3 folders (where 4 and 5 are defaults):
1. HR
2. FIN
3. CS
4. Administrators
5. Everyone
Each author is defaulted to number 5, and all administrators should be included in group 4.
Now the goal is to prevent HR and FIN from modifying CS, and vice-versa for the other two groups.
You will see in your library that the root is defined as "/". Firstly, ensure that the Administrators group has Modify access to this folder (Administration --> Manage Groups --> Permissions). I think you need to click on edit, then click on the "Add" button (under permissions), and choose the root folder "/" - ensure it has modify - by default this value should already exist. This now ensures that the security is filtered down to all sub-ordinate folders that exist under the root folder - you do not need to manually assign "modify" permissions to each folder for the Administrator group, as you have already done so at root level.
You will also notice that there is a "Members/Users" tab (can't remember off the top of my head which), and this allows you to select the profiles/authors that have Administrator group priviledges - ensure the correct users are selected.
I normally leave the "Everyone" group as it is - do this for now, ensure everyone is included in it, and only modify after you have implemented and tested your security structure if needs be - normally the other group permissions override the "Everyone" group permissions.
Next step is to assign department specific permissions to the 3 folders we created. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Groups, and ensure that you begin by editing the first department group (HR) - create the group if not already done, then edit (little pencil logo). You would like all HR users to have full modify access to their folder only, but they must not be able to mess around with the other two departments or the "System", "Getting started with UPK" and "/" folders. Under permissions, click on the Add button, and ensure that the folder "HR" has modify priviledge. Add the remaining 4 folders (CS, FIN, System, Getting started with UPK), and assign either Read or Read/View permission - this will ensure all other folders cannot be modified by HR users. Add the relevant HR users to the group under the "Members/Users" tab.
Apply the same for FIN and CS respectively.
Now you could get to a point where you may need cross-departmental access for a few users (FIN may need to access some HR content). I recommed that you do this on the user level, and not the group level, as you will limit who can access other departments. Navigate to Administration --> Manage Authors. Click on the specific user that will require access to another department. Edit his profile and under the permissions tab, ensure that he has required access to the other department folder (or sub-folders only) by adding and assigning the priveledge. This should ovveride the group security set for that specific department - but only for this user!
Test by attempting to create content in an un-authorised folder (when logged in as a normal user). Test admin account by creating content in each folder. If it works - you will no longer need to modify "Everyone", as your permissions are defined under the other groups. I hope this all makes sense?
Thats it in a nutshell really.
I hope that this helps, and feel free to get back to me if you are still unsure?
Regards,
Greig

Architectural Help - Converting Single-User DB to Multi-User

I have a single-user database running in Java 1.4. I want to convert it to a multi-user database targeted at really small (no way they can buy Oracle) groups. I have a lot of expertise in the old way (file/record locking, avoiding deadly embrace, etc.) but don't think this is right for Java.
What would be a good Java architecture for such a small DBMS? Initially it would be fine to just run a server on a network, tho longer-term it would be great if the solution extended to a remote server on the net. J2EE is not in the cards unless its absolutely required.

Thanks, warnerja.
Here's the issue. The user is viewing a list of names (customers or whatever). Names are physically stored in the order entered; logically viewed sorted on last name, then first. The user drags the elevator car two thirds of the way down. Now what?
Using SQL-based anything, you're pretty much forced to query the table for the whole result set; keep it in memory and then scroll off that. Suppose you have lots of names - 100K or more. This goes dead slow. Worse, in real applications your names will be inner-joined to maybe several other tables so the problem really multiplies.
See MS Access for a good example of how bad this can be. I've got one where the user clicks the down arrow on a combo box and then waits two minutes (actual, measured with my own watch, wait time) for the list to appear. Ugh.
I've created an indexing method I call the b++tree, which makes it perfectly simple to respond to that user action: goto( 66000 ); getNext( 20 ). If my calculations are correct, that goto() should happen in a single disk read and about ten millis.

Multi-user login screen help

I am looking into an application front end with NI hardware controlling a temp process. The fun thing is the multi-user login that controls the screens you can access. Does anyone know of a good way to accomplish this?

I've attached it below. Here is the description from the webpage:
This VI uses Key Down events to control the user login process. The user must enter the username and password using only upper and lowercase letters. If the user enters other characters, the VI displays an error message and discards the event. The VI also converts all uppercase letters to lowercase before verifying the username and password in a subVI. "Number of loops" displays the number of times the While Loop iterates, which is the number of times an event occurs on the front panel.
J.R. Allen
Attachments:
Events_Login.llb ‏101 KB

Set Database Back to Multi User from Single User

I am using SharePoint Services 3.0 (SP1) with default configuration options, which installs the Microsoft##SSEE instance of SQL to my local C:\ drive.
While attempting to relocate the files to another drive, I set one of the databases (as recommended) to Single User by using the SQL Server Management Express tool.
I cannot now reset that database to Multi User, even by executing the query
exec sp_dboption 'database_name', 'single user', ''FALSE'
again by using the Management Express Tool.
Can someone please help, in plain english???? Thanks

I have similar issue.
I have took backup of WSUS (Windows Server 2002 R2) Windows internal database using SQL Server 2008 Management Studio and restored on Windows Server 2012 R2 Server.
Now SUSDB database was in Single User mode. I have tried ALTER DATABASE <<Database Name>> SET MULTI_USER WITH NO_WAIT and i'm getting blow error.
Msg 5069, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER DATABASE statement failed.
How i can change it Multi User?
Thanks
Uma

Oracle 10g multi node installation

Hi,
Multi node installation for Oracle 10g Appl Server
- Node A: Install core business Database server.
- Node B: Install Application Server Infrastructure (OID, repository database).
- Node C: Install Application server middle tier (forms, reports, portal, discoverer, java) at node C. must specify the OID server (node B). And configurre tnsnames to access database server (node A).
steps for this. Any doc or link
Thanking you
regards,

As simple as you mentioned.
1.- Install db in node A
2.- Install Infra in node B, you will get a servername and port for OID (look on $OH/install/portlist.ini to get it), and the password, usually the same as for the System and Sys users for the repository.
3.- Install Apps in node C, even if you install infra and apps in same node, the installer will always promp for the OID server name and port wich I mentioned earlier.
4.- Configure node C tnsnames to access node A
Hope this helps
Greetings.

How to install Multi-Client Installation of Oracle Developer

Could someone help me figure out the documentation on how to do
a multi-client installation of Oracle Developer. I'm reading
the section 1.3 in the Getting Started manual for Oracle
Developer on NT. In trying to configure the OCSM host machine
there are no entries for installing OCCM or OCSA in the Oracle
Installer.
Could someone instruct me as to the proper way to do this? The
documentation just doesn't match the product.
Thanks
Ken
null

Sounds like a good idea! Could you email me a sample of
the .reg file to edit. [email protected]
Thanks!
Jeff.
elmo recio (guest) wrote:
: Ken Pereyra (guest) wrote:
: : Could someone help me figure out the documentation on how to
do
: : a multi-client installation of Oracle Developer. I'm
reading
: : the section 1.3 in the Getting Started manual for Oracle
: : Developer on NT. In trying to configure the OCSM host
machine
: : there are no entries for installing OCCM or OCSA in the
Oracle
: : Installer.
: : Could someone instruct me as to the proper way to do this?
The
: : documentation just doesn't match the product.
: : Thanks
: : Ken
: I dunno if this will help. But the way we do things here is to
: install oracle developer on the NT server, share the directory,
: and then run a .REG file that set's up the user's registry data
: as to where to point to for the OraWin directory. In this case
: each time a user logs in via his remote machine he mounts a
drive
: letter (X, let's say) and the .REG points to all the orawin
stuff
: on that drive... so the client hasnt got to install it at all
: except the .REG entry.
: ciao, elmo
null

Several users on a single file issue: Hosting a multi user Quickbooks file on the WD EX4

Hello everyone. This is going to sound like a super specific third party support issue - but there are some universal things going on here that may help others regarding multiple users of individual files on the EX4. My company houses client and billing files on the EX4. It's all been well and good until we recently allowed multi-user access to our Quickbooks company file. Of course the goal is to have multiple employees working on the file at the same time from different computers. We purchased licenses for each - everything is on the up and up. Whereas I could access the company file on the EX4 with no problems on my computer as a single user, now as soon as I turn on multiuser mode in QB to allow others to access the file on the EX4, the file becomes inaccessible. What do you guys think is happening where one user access to a file on the EX4 is fine, but multiuser access causes the file to be inaccessible? How do you fix it? Other thoughts, there doesn't seem to be a limitation on the EX4 relating to multiple people accessing the same file - streaming the same song for example. So why would a billing database file be any different? Especially when the licenses and program allow that access. Here's more info, if I host the file on my desktop computer everyone can access it in multiuser mode over the network. The limitation is the WD EX4. What do you think is going on? (I'd appreciate any insight as I am talking to both tech support teams, QB and WD, this week.)

Thank you so much for your reply. The error shows up when one switches to multi-user mode. It states: Error H101, H202, H303, or H505: when opening your company file When you open a company file in multi-user mode, you see an error:You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and this copy of QuickBooks can't reach the server on that computer (H202).You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and that computer needs additional installation and setup. (H101, H303, and H505).It appears that the QuickBooks software on computer [server name] is set up to allow shared connections to the company file, but the QuickBooks software on your computer is unable to communicate with it. (H202).Most often it's an H202 error which suggests that the program can't reach the server on that computer (NAS location). Why would the NAS location become invisible / unreachable once multi-user mode is on? I really appreciate your expert brainstorm and ideas.

File Discrepancies for Multi Users

Hi ...
We are running RH7 and RSC3.1 with 3 users - We identified
(only yesterday) that after User 1 had deleted one topic file from
Project Manager and added several others ... User 2 and 3 had
broken links for these topics.
We are able to update existing topics by one user, who check
in, then user 2 and 3 can get the latest version and instantly view
the changes - lovely!! Exactly what we would expect ...
But the same is not occurring when we remove or add entire
topics to both the Project Manager and the TOC ...
User 2 and 3 see the topics in the TOC with the dreaded red
cross through them ... and have to try and locate the file or
restore broken links etc ... to get their view of the project in
sync with User 1. This seems to defeat the whole purpose of being
able to have a multi user authoring environment????
A major concern of this problem appears to be the risk of
undoing each others work by potentially restoring files that
another user intended to remove ...
Is anyone else experiencing similar issues ... we are in a
big organisation and are very restricted in terms of our ability to
access the servers etc ... but I want to know if there is something
we should be checking or doing differently from an application
perspective? Any advice or ideas are greatly appreciated...
Many thanks ...
Frustrated!

Hi Fi@qldpol, and welcome to the board. With your situation,
there are two likely possibilities:
1. Was your project added to source control via RoboHelp, or
was it initially added using RoboSource Control? If it was added
from RoboSource Control, then that is the problem.
2. If #1 is not the problem, then you might be having
problems with some of the users' CPD files. First, have everyone
make backups of the local version of their project (the files
actually residing on their PCs). Then have User 2 and User 3 delete
their copy of the project, and replace it with a copy of User 1's
local files. Before they open the project, they should delete the
cpd and pss files. After they delete those files, they can open the
project as usual and let the cpd file rebuild. We have to do this
every so often with some of our projects to get everyone
synchronized.
Hope that helps.
G

How to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1 and 6.1 server..(Urgently)

Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

Hi. A JDBC connection pool is a set of identical, interchangeable, pre-made
connections, and the controls to make sure only one user uses a particular
connection at any one time. If you want to have different DBMS users, you can
have a separate pool for each DBMS user, which may contain as many or few
connections as you want. Some applications has a pool for the accounting
applications, and another for the sales applications etc. Some do have a
separate pool for john, jane, joe etc, each with one connection. Pools
can be created and destroyed dynamically using the dynamic pool API.
Joe
softstar wrote:
>
Hi all,
I need to know how to set Multi User Environment in the weblogic 5.1
properties file..
Here my question is..:)
1) I have a database with multiple users and having different privileges
for the users.. and i need to use all the privileges when user aceess
the database through weblogic server connectionPool.
2)According to the user privileges i need access the database tables
content and gives the frontEnd(jsp).
3)How to modify dynamically weblogic.properties file in the weblogic
5.1.
If anybody having idea reg. this issues pl...help me..
Thanks in advance
Chandu([email protected],[email protected])

How to send one email to multi-users using JavaMail ?

I am using JavaMail API. I am working in "sending emails to users", I had already tested "one email to one user" and got success but when tried to send one email to multi-users then I failed to do that?
Can anyone help me to do this?
I have used the below code to send to multi-user:
Address[] toAddr = {new InternetAddress(_to),new InternetAddress (to2)};
msg.addRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, toAddr);
But it is static only 2 users. I want to send to multi-users dynamically taking datas from database.
I have tried by using below code but it doesn't work.....
InternetAddress[] emails;
while (resultset.next()) {
temp = resultset.getString(1);
emails.setAddress(temp);
i++;
Address[] toAddr = emails;
msg.addRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, toAddr);
Thank you in advance...
-ritesh

I think you're confused about some basic Java programming techniques.
There are two obvious ways to do this.
1. Call the addRecipient method in a loop.
2. Collect all the recipients in a List, convert it to an array, and call addRecipients.

Windows XP: multi-user accounts - one works, another doesnt!

Hi all,
I have installed the JRE many a time, but never on an XP machine with multi-user accounts...
my problem is that a jar file I have will run on one XP account, while the other account won't run, I just get Null Pointer Exceptions if i try to run it using "java -jar myApp.jar" or a Fatal Error JVM error if I double click the jar.
Any ideas? I tried installing the JRE from both user accounts, but no luck. Please help! :(
Scott

edit: sorry guys, n/m..it wasn't a JRE issue after all :)

File structure and Multi-user access/control

Hi All
Currently evaluating RH. Our plan is to use RH HTML with RoboServer and either SourceSafe or Team Foundation for source control. We will be producing the "printed" manual (PDF) and publishing online help (hopefully html via RH server) from the single source layout
Given that we will edit content in RH's XHTML editor, I'm not clear on when we should create new files or the granularity of multi-user access. We have 17 apps and I plan to use a master project and merging (because we need to link to related topics in other apps).
I'm really not sure what should constitute a file in RH. First off, is access controlled at the file level?
I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
Any pointers greatly appreciated
Regards
Mark

Hi,
First off, is access controlled at the file level?
Not sure what you mean by that. In source control, you can check in/out ever file independent. Sometimes dependent files will be automatically checked out, for instance images used in the css when you check out the style sheet.
I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
That be the idea. Anyway, it's not a good idea to have an entire RoboHelp project in a single topic. You probably want to cut up your contents into the small chunck: topics.
If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
In RoboHelp a topic is a HTML file. RoboHelp doesn't force you to split up content into one or more topics. If you are creating help for the web, you want the information to be organized in relatively small chunck so users can quickly scan through it.
Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
Not sure what you mean by page breaks. As RoboHelp creates HTML files, there are no page breaks such as in paper manuals. When you create a PDF, you combine the topics you need into a single document.
If a PDF is required for you, you may want to consider not using RoboHelp for your sources. A PDF created by RoboHelp is useful for internal use, but it never seems to get good enough to give to customers. Personally, when a PDF version of a manual is required, I create the manual in FrameMaker and link or import the book into RoboHelp. You can also link Word documents, so you may want to play around with that before deciding whether to use Word, RoboHelp or FrameMaker for your source.
Greet,
Willam

In OWB the repository user installation failed.

I have installed oracle 10g for oracle warehouse builder and installed owb.
after installation Im trying to create a reposity using uid: auroora pw:auroora
and i have entered all the connection fields at last it is showing an eroor as follows.
the reposity user installation failed on users
java.lang.exception
java.lang.Nullpointer.exception.
I will be thankful to u if u help me in this regard. waiting for u reply.
thnx in advance
regards
srinivas

I have same problem (java.lang.exception java.lang.Nullpointer.exception.) when I try to add reporsitory user by Repository Assistant. When I fill all pages from that wizard and press Finish, then I get java exception error alert with exception mentioned above. Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options and OWB client10.2.0.3.0/repository10.2.0.3.33. This happened since we have migrated from 32b to 64b version. Any workarounds???

RVM Multi-User Installation Help

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for