SAP IS-T (FICA)

Hello guys,
We create SD Billing Document that are transferred in FICA. We would like to know if it is possible to not update the "Profitability Segment field = FKKOPK-PAOBJNR" since CO-PA is updated during the initial creation of the billing document.
Thanks in advance, for your cooperation.
Kind regards,
Panagiotis Keleris

This is not fully correct.
There is a clear difference in the Master Data Management of FICA and RMCA. FICA is built up with the concept of one Business Partner to one ore many Contract Accounts, one Contract Account has connection to one ore more contracts. Contract is linked to the technical part of SAP Utilities via the move in process here the Business Master data and the Technical Master data is joined via this process.
RMCA are only working with the concept of Business Partner and Contract Account, and have no direct link to the Technical Master date in Telecoms.
However in the configuration, FICA and RMCA is nearly the same. But when it comes to standard integration to the rest of the SAP world, e.g. SAP Financial Supply Chain Management (FIN-FSCM). The integration possibilities are depending on the release you are working on. E.g. Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable (FI-CA) As of Industry Release 4.72 Note that the integration for Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable (FI-CA) in releases that are earlier than SAP ERP 2005 is subject to a restricted level of functions. There is no standard integration for RMCA, the same principals using dunning by dunning strategies can be used, but this need to be run via FCC Financial Customer Care (CRM) by the use of Industry Business Function Set and special functionality integrating RMCA to FCC.
If other areas have the same restriction, if you have both FICA and RMCA activated, you can view the integration to other SAP components.
Both systems is build for mass volume handling in receivables.
Per Engholt

Similar Messages

Integrating SAP SD with FICA

Dear all,
I want to know what settings we need to do in SAP SD side with config steps .I know the settings on FICA but confused with SAP SD settings.When we create a business partner in FI-CA, it should possible to create an SD customer in the background at the same time.Can anyone please tell me how to do this and which transaction we can create this.When i am going through the training document on FICA it is saying that when entering the SD order we must select a contract account.I want to know how to do this
susmita

If you are working with PSCD, then you have CVI (Customer vendor integration) to replicate the BP to the customer in SD. In this scenario you have to check the following settings
Cross-Application Components->SAP Business Partner->Integration with Customer- /Vendor Master Data->Assign Business Partner Grouping to Customer Account Groups
You must check the number ranges in
Financial Accounting (New)->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Customer Accounts->Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data->Create Number Ranges for Customer Accounts
The number ranges should be the same that you defined for BP's, but with the mark of external assignment.
Hope this helps.
Cristóbal.

SAP SD Interface with SAP ISU FICA

Hi all,
I want to know if we bill the customer for the energy and the non energy charges seperately.
Energy charges as per the consumption we bill them in SAP ISU and also invoice them in SAP ISU , the open item will be posted in SAP ISU FICA.
For the Energy charges if i bill the customer in SAP SD and then i want to post that in SAP ISU FICA what kind of the configuration i had to perform.
And when we create the Business Partner in SAP ISU it is created in SAP SD also.
Regards,
Himanshu

Hi,
Please search in sdn isu section.
Integrating SAP SD with FICA
Billing - SD and IS-U
SD + FICA Integration
sap sd and sap isu integration
Re: Posting documents from SD to FICA

Reversal of reversals not permitted in case of returns&payments FICA (ISU)

We are constantly facing a problem on which we would like to have comments from you.
Problem:-
A payment comes and clears a receivable. A return is posted for the payment and the user later realizes that the return was posted incorrectly. Now, a reversal of this return is desired. SAP (ISU in FICA module) does not allow to reverse this and throws the message u201CDocument XXXXXXX can not be reversed due to reset clearingu201D.
Same is true for the reversal of a u2018payment reversalu2019

Ija,
Just a question, instead of resetting the clearing at step 4, why don't you reverse the payment document? When reversing the system is smart enough to know that this is a payment document and asks whether you would like to transfer it back to clarification. So you don't actually reverse it. If you say yes then you have two options. Leave it in clarification and wait to see what the customer wants to do. Secondly if you want to post it on account to the contract account you can do this out of clarification. If you find out later that it was the wrong contract account the sysetm again lets you reverse this document (which again puts it back in clarification) so that you can post to the correct contract account.
I think that your problem is that by reset the clearing that you lose the clarification link. When I am playing around with payments and returns I always use the reverse document first because it give the option to take it back to clarification.
Hope this helps.
Natalie

Unable to see all the service of ES Bundle after EHP4

Hello All,
We have upgraded to ERP 6.0 EhP4.
I wish to use the services available in ES Bundle "External Cash Desk"
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ESpackages/ExternalCashDeskEnterpriseServices
But when I open SOAMANAGER and try to search with query as "cash", I am able to see only 1 service in the namespace http://sap.com/xi/FICA/Global i.e. "CashPointOpenItemSummaryByElementsQueryResponse_In".
Please tell me if there is any other way to search for the service.
Do let me know why am I not able to see all the services.
regards,
Piyush

Hi Piyush,
>Can you also tell me that can we call synch and asynch services without PI in the landscape
Sync service is like any other webservice which work over http and using SOAP protocol so calling Sync service is not issue even w/o PI.
On other hand Async services need some sort of middleware as they are not real time and often need integration with thridparty/legacy interfaces hence they need PI to manage transformation and transport part of communication.
Async services are usually designed for mediated communication (i.e. using middleware like PI).
Regards,
Gourav

FPY1 FKK_ID 31 The latest prenot. for bank details ID 0001 of BP is inactive

Hi Guru
I am getting this error, while running FPY1. I followed the stardard SAP solution for FICA and AUDDIS integration. (Prenotifications - Country-Specific Functions - SAP Library) . Can anyone advise me please, what i need to do in order to below correct error. Please i need to do it ASAP, i would apprecitate if some give me the quick Answer. Thank you
Regards
Ram
FKK_ID
31
The latest prenot. for bank details ID 0001 of BP 0000409333 / 000001000477 is inactive

In BP check the bank data exists in payment transactions tab and in contract account the same data should be present.

Contract Account - Default Values [IS-U]

Is there a standard way to default the payment terms, and possibly other values in the IS-U contract account?

Mashudu:
You have several choices for defaulting values depending on the customer requirements:
Parameter Ids can be provided in user defaults area (almost all transactions and screens but dependent on the application programmers desire to use them)
transaction variants can be created and maintained (most but no all transactions can be used with variants)
CAWM - Contract account area menu - this utilizes business data toolset functionality.
For more info - check the website
https://service.sap.com/bdt
FICA event 1017 - utilizes standard FICA event technique. Search other posts for FQEVENTS, i.e. what is 'FQEVENTS'? - How to use FICA and IS event technique to customize
regards,
bill.

SAP ISU FICA Posting.

Hi All,
I had a requirement which says.
When a payment is received in third party system, then we have to trigger a RFC to post payment in SAP ISU FICA.
This RFC will post the payment and return the payment document number.
what all done in the payment third party system should be posted in SAP synchronously.
Does any one have an Idea of a BAPI / RFC which i can use for this purpose.
Regards,
Himanshu Sharma

If you have PI available, you should look into the External cash desk functionality
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ESpackages/ExternalCashDesk
If you dont have PI available, then you could look into the following BAPIs:
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_CREATE
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_APPEND
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_RELEASE
BAPI_CTRACPAYMINC_CLOSE
Best regards,
Cristobal.

FICA -IDOC for posting the billing data from NON-SAP ISU system

Hi,
Kindly note we are implementing NON-SAP ISU with SAP FICA for the finance implementation. In this context, we ahve identified BAPI for BP and CA. We have decided to go for transaction posting through the transaction FPE1. For this, we are looking for the transaction data IDOC which is CTRACDOCUMENT_ACCOUNT (FICA Posting) in the WEDI. But it seems that it is not yet released. Can anybody help me out for this to either identify the equivalent IDOC or other method to post the data from Banner system (NON-SAP ISU ) system. We are presently not implmenting billing system in SAP ISU, but only FI system

Hi,
you can create the same...
but normal practice what we do is create swc for each system so that it is easy to maintain and easy to extend in the future..
or else follow some conventions if you are just starting the things..
HTH
Rajesh

How to set up a link between sap fica transaction and cic front office

Hi Guys,
How to configure between SAP FICA transaction (FPR1 for create installation plan) to CIC front office.
I did some changes in FPR1 transaction, same changes which are not reflecting on CIC screen, when i log on to CIC0 and select the create install plan, It is automatically go to FPR1 but it is not showing with that changes.
I checked all the way but it is missing the link some where. plz drop any ideas on this.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hi Matt, create a column of type "enhanced rich text." Then in your datasheet view, double click on the field in that column and use your "insert" tab to upload a file. You'll then see the file in this cell and you can open it straight
from the datasheet view.
cameron rautmann

Tranining details SAP FICA ( ISU) IUT 240 Accounts receivabale and Payable

Hi All ,
Can you please provide me the Tranining details / Certification/ links or docs for the regarding the content .
IUT 240 Accounts receivabale and Payable ---SAP FICA ( ISU)
Regards
Rahul

Hi All ,
Can anyone please let me know the details regarding that .
Regards
Rahul

FICA SAP Query

Has anyone tried building an SAP Query (SQ01) against the FICA transaction tables: DFKKKO (header) + DFKKOPK (GL line items) + DFKKOP (BP line items)?
I'm getting duplicate line items (OPUPK) on my SAP Query.
My INFOSET was created by creating an inner join between DFKKKO to DFKKOPK and DFKKO to DFKKOP. The join is based on document number (OPBEL).
I also tried an INFOSET by joining DFKKKO to DFKKOPK to DFKKOP by doc number. This is also diplaying duplicate line items.

Hi Ken
It's clear now.
The problem will appear when DFKKOP will have less lines than DFKKOPK. How do you want those lines to be displayed?
The issue is that, although SAP Query is a nice and quite easy tool, it has its limitations. One of them: you are not able to add lines, meaning if you have one line of information and would like to generate 2 lines in the report, you can't.
Of course, you can "trick" the system.
One of the solutions is to have internal tables in which you remember the lines you posted and check each line against that table.
You may have problems when you don't have lines in DFKKOP, but you have lines in DFKKOPK, if the join is not done correctly.
Another problem: DFKKOP lines are split when you make a partial payment, so you may have 3 lines of partial payment for field OPUPK equal to 1.
So, my suggestion:
- do not join like this DFKKKO - DFKKOP - DFKKOPK, but like this:
DFKKKO - DFKKOP
- DFKKOPK
Both left joins.
- take into account what I wrote above and be very clear in your requirements and specifications, i.e. establish what you will do when you encounter the situations I described earlier.
Please ask me whatever is not clear and give some more information about your goal.
Bogdan

Need SAP ISU FICA Certification syllabus & Tutorial

Hi ,
I am planning to attend SAP ISU FICA( IUT 240 Accounts receivabale and Payable ) Certification ,Can anyone please provide me the syllabus for SAP ISU FICA & Tutorial /Links / Docs for SAP FICA .
Regards
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
You can refer the following document:- http://help.sap.com/saphelp_utilities472/helpdata/en/c6/4dce68eafc11d18a030000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Cheers
Dhirendra

Third Party Tax System and SAP-ISU FICA

Hello Experts,
We are implementing SAP solution for north american utility company. We are using SABRIX to calculate FI / SD invoice taxes. We want to use SABRIX for CR&B(ISU) invoices also. I know about below configuration:
SPRO > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Tax on Sales/Purchases > Basic Settings > External Tax Calculation > Activate External Tax Calculation
I checked few other config documents and found RFC function module "RFC_CALCULATE_TAXES_DOC" . According to config document if I execute this function module with RFC Target sys = "SABRIX" & with required parameters then system (FM) will return me tax amount (by calling SABRIX). Now, this function module doesn't contain CR&B document specific parameters such "contract account (FKKVKP-VKONT)" but this function module is very specific to FI / SD document that's why it has parameters ex. "ACCNT_NO - Vendor or ship-to customer account number".
So my first question is - 1) Do we have separate RFC to calculate taxes for CR&B FICA document? Which RFC gets triggered during ISU Invoicing?
2) If there is no separate RFC to differentiate between CR&B document and normal FI/SD document then can we use RFC already provided by SAP? do we need to create our custom RFC?
3) I need to assign tax jurisdiction code on the connection object without any manual intervention using address details. But I am not able to find standard config that can call SABRIX RFC during connection object creation to update Jurisdiction Code details.
Example - for the business partner I can pass address details to fetch jurisdiction code from the SABRIX using below config:
SPRO > Cross-Application Components > SAP Business Partner > Business Partner > Basic Settings > Tax Jurisdictions > Using Non-SAP Tax Software > Define RFC Destination for Tax Software
So is there any other standard way to update jurisdiction code on the connection object?
Any information would be of great help. Thanks.

>
Edie wrote:
> However, due to our business requirements, we still need pursue a POS systems ( Macros Retail, Wincor Nixdorf etc etc ) that can integrate back to the backend SAP Retail.
>
> Am wondering any gurus here that has the experience o ifmplementing SAP retail with 3rd party POS system
> integration and if yes, any direct recommendation.
>
> My apologies on this but can you further elaborate on the SAP Enterprise POS. How does it works and whether it's another application with full POS functionality that SAP offers ?
I will forward your posting to the responsible solution manager. He will get in conact with you and will give you an unbeatable offer for a POS solution.
Edie wrote:
> PS : Does SAP retail publish a list of POS vendors that can support SAP integration via "out-of-box" method ?
Yes, please look at
SAP Point-of-Sale–Hardware certification (POS-HW)

Archiving SAP ISU FICA Documents

Hi
We are planning to archive SAP Print documents. Just wondering what is the best place to fit in the Archiving of FICA Documents. Before Print Documents or After Meter Reading Documents (when all the other objects are archived) Archiving?
What are the pros and cons of each approach?
Any Idea would be helpful.
I know from process prespective we can do anywhere but from a SAP Best practise or Other utitlities standards what is a recommended appraoch?
Thanks

Hi Ankur,
FICA documents are of 2 types: One is the clearing document and the other is the main document which is being cleared. (Here the main document is the corresponding FICA posting of an invoice). The archiving object FI_MKKDOC (for archiving FICA documents) archives both of these FICA documents separately. When you run the archiving program, you get two radio buttons:
1. ''Only Pure Clearing/ Stat. Documents''
2. ''Other documents (Invoice, Credit Memos, and so on)''.
There is a dependency within this object that the clearing documents should be archived before archiving the main document.
Hence regarding the program documentation of FI_MKKDOC you mentioned, the statement ''You cannot archive the invoice until you have archived the payment", it mentions the dependency of clearing and main FICA documents within the same object FI_MKKDOC and it does not mention the dependency between the object FI_MKKDOC and object ISU_PRDOCL (which is the object for Print document line item archiving).
Now coming to the dependency of different objects, unless and until the print document line items (object ISU_PRDOCL) and print document header items (object ISU_PRDOCH) are archived, the main documents of object FI_MKKDOC cannot be archived.
Hence as per the standard SAP process, the sequence of archiving should be first ISU_PRDOCL, then ISU_PRDOCH and only then object FI_MKKDOC (i.e first the print documents and then the FICA documents).
Again, within, FI_MKKDOC also, archive the ''Only Pure clearing documents'' first and only then archive ''Other Documents''.
Hope this helps. Please let me know if you need any further clarifications.
Regards,
Megha

SAP IS-T (FICA)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for