Sap note 111232-redetermined batch in billing

Dear Experts,
I have activated split valuation batch in MM and Valuation type is automatically created when i do the GR.
so my batch wise revenue and cost is following to COPA but valuation type characteristic is not following to COPA.
I have read some note.
Stating that -create valuation type(BWTAR) as characterstics with ref. to VBAP table
2)Then go to SM30 enter V_TKEZU and change
CharacteristicB TranTable--Field name
Bwtar--KEDR-KOMP--BWTAR
Above, need to change VBAP to KOMP
Will it works?
Because my system(sandbox) is locked for cross client customization.need to commit client for valuation type(Batch) wise profitability.
Also why we changed VBAP to KOMP in above logic. What does it means?
regards
RR

Hi Ajay,
I had word with SD consultant.But he dont know the procedure of redetermine pricing at Billing.
There was update button in billing under condition tab and redetrmine option is also there.
he dont know.How to redetermine?
If you have any idea.Request you to share.
regards
RR

Similar Messages

Price List Error in Bill of Materials in relation to SAP Note 1056208

Hi Experts,
I have uploaded the Bill of Materials --both the Header and Lines using DTW successfully but when I try to update the Product Price of the Parent manually in the Bill of Materials, this error occurs:
"Variation between number of price lists and number of price lists for items"
I have also tried running the script provided in SAP Note 1056208 to check if there are any inconsistencies in the Price List records but there is none. The number of records in both tables are the same.
We have 3 levels of Bill of Materials (FG, WIP1, WIP2). I need to update the Product Price of WIP2 first so that its price will appear in the line items since it is a component of WIP1.
I hope you could help me with my problem and I would appreciate your prompt replies.
Thank you very much!

Hi!
In BOM u will find a Orange Color Drop Down Arrow @ Right-Bottom Corner. You have to click on that to generate Price for your Parent based on the Child.
Select the Approp Price List in Header of BOM and in Row Level. Update prices for Child Items, now Follow the above step.

SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

Hi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Inspn For 103 Movnt Type UD Not allowing without Batch

Hi Experts
We have one scenario : For Incoming materials we are doing 103 GR Block stock and system
not asking any batch during MIGO.And after quality inspection (RR) 105 Block stock to unrestricted
(Here we are entering the batch). But before this we need to take UD for the lot
but system is not allowing me to do UD without Batch. For time being we are doing stock posting only.
Kindly advise me how can I take UD without Batch for 103 inspection lots.
Inadvance Thanks
Shiva Patil

Hi Vishal / Sanil,
The problem is QM don't want create this batch we have suggested this they want system should assign automatically. In 103 there is no such a way that MM can enter this batch. QM is asking we haven't entered the batch in 103 so we want this lot need to be close without Batch.
1) Which sap note is suitable for this kindly suggest me
Thanks
Shiva Patil

Parking not possible during batch input

Hello,
Iu2019m facing a problem for creating a parked vendor invoice in background (Tcode FB60 / FV60) thru BDC or BAPI.
I looked for a BAPI and I just found "BAPI_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT_POST", for posting FI invoice : it doesnu2019t correspond to our requirements (we need to park).
Then I used "PRELIMINARY_POSTING_DOC_WRITE" for parking an invoice but when we see the parked invoice in FBV2, the displayed Tcode is like FBV1. The users want the vendor invoice header, I mean the same screen as FB60.
Finally, I tried to use Batch Input to park but I got the following message :
"Parking not possible during batch input"
Message no. FP140
Procedure
In Customizing, you can control whether an error message is issued."
I found nothing in IMG about control message
And in sdn forums, some said that bdc doesnu2019t work for an enjoy transaction (MIRO, MIR7, FB60 ..) but we already created a BDC for MIR7 and it works.
Thanks,

You can use [CALL TRANSACTION|http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_70/en/ABAPCALL_TRANSACTION.htm] like BDC.
via CALL TRANSACTION you may use [bdc options with NOBINPT |http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_70/en/ABAPCALL_TRANSACTION_BDC_OPTIONS.htm] so the systeme field sy-binpt will be initial.
You will need to manage the error messages in your program.(no SM35) one solution is to build the BDC for records with errors.
There are many threads on [difference Between Batch Input and Call Transaction in BDC|https://forums.sdn.sap.com/search.jspa?threadID=&q=differenceBatchInputCallTransaction&objID=c42&dateRange=all&numResults=15&rankBy=10001]
Regards,
Raymond

1KEJ : Runtime Error (SAP note 725478)

Hello All
When I run 1KEJ in my test system it gives a run time error both in forground and background mode (it gets cancelled).
I have done settlement for only 1 Order and WIP is also there for only 1 Order.
Since I am running 1KEJ for first time I am selecting 'Create Opening balance' : Sap says it takes some time to update opening balance as it has to read history. But in my case there is no history since there is only 1 WIP posting in system.
I checked SAP note 725478 and it says :
If you have large datasets for material stocks and WIP stocks you can no
longer use Transactions 1KEH and 1KEJ. Instead you should use the online
transfer. During this process, the material accounts and WIP accounts are
entered into Transaction 3KEH. This should have no considerable effect on
the online performance.
If you want to start the transfer of balance sheet accounts into Profit
Center Accounting and to set up the opening balances you can neither use
Transactions 1KEH and 1KEJ. In this case, create the opening balances using
single entry, manual postings in PCA (depending on your release use
Transaction 1KEL or 9KE0). If you want to create the opening balances with
batch input for the manual PCA document entry, due to the large quantity of
accounts, use Transaction 1KEL, regardless of your release. Transaction
9KE0 does not support batch input.
Question from my side :
I am can surely link Material and WIP accouns in 3KEH. But How do you create opening balance of WIP from 9KE0 ? Is there something special you need to do ?
Has anyone handled this situation ?
Best Regards
Vijay Purohit

Hello Ajay
But if 3KEH will update WIP (for example) on real time I am not sure why we need 9KE0 to have a opening balance.
If i goto 9KE0 is it just the date (first day of the go live month) which will mean opening balance.?? i.e from legacy system if any.
Is it better option to update 3KEH with Stock accounts , rather using 1KEH
Best Regards
Vijay
Edited by: Purohit Vijay on Mar 4, 2011 10:59 AM

Rate of exchange should be redetermined at the billing date

Dear sap gurus,
client requirement is to ROE should be redetermined at the billing date.
copy control settings if we maintain c in vtfl at item level, will it solve my purpose.
i am wonder as of now how this ROE is determined by the system.
pls explain me the basic of how ROE is determined.
regards
phani

Dear Phani,
Wellcome back...
I guess my reply to your post on 12.10.2009 explains the your current issue.
Anyways, the Exchange Rate determined based on the following:
1. Manual Entry (in Sales Order - exchange Rate feild. (This Manual entry has a priority over all others)
2. If the Exchange Rate feild is blank then system takes Pricing Date as the base & looks for the exchange rate in OB08 for that date.
Here (for point no. 2 you have following options in Item Level Copy controls:
Pricing Exhange Rate Type (V_TVCPFLP-PFKUR)
A Copy from sales order
B Price exchange rate = Accouting rate
C Exchange rate determination according to billing date
D Exchange rate determination according to pricing date
E Exchange rate determination according to current date
F Exch.rate determination accord.to date of services rendered
Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Leave to transaction "SAPMF05L" not allowed in batch input

Hello,
When we run FF.5 with the file sent from Itaú, it is generated a batch input for transaction FB02 which updates the reference key 1, 2 and 3 (XREF1, XREF2 and XREF3) in the documents.
There are some cases where the batch input does not update all the document items. For example, I got a document that has 32 items to be updated with the reference keys, but the update is only done in the first 14 document items. I observed that the batch input only updates up to number 14 because the standard program does not u201Cscroll the baru201D to check if there are more items in the document to be updated. The batch input is having trouble and generating some incorrect transactions and showing the error message: LEAVE TO TRANSACTION u201CSAPMF05Lu201D not allowed in batch input.
I tried to find a SAP note, but couldnu2019t find anything that was related to this. Does anyone got this problem and maybe can help me?
Thanks,
Leandro

if you want to leave a batch session try "/bend" or "/n" to move to the next record.

Oracle Parameter _FIX_CONTROL: EWA vs SAP Note Recommendation?

We have Oracle 11.2.0.2 on RedHat Linux
cat /$ORACLE_HOME/sapbundle/version.txt
SAP Bundle Patch 11.2.0.2.3 - 201108
For FIXCONTROL '6055658:OFF' what recommendation should I take the SAP Note or EWA?
1) SAP NOTE
In the SAP Note 1431798 "Oracle 11_2_0 Database Parameter Settings" ...
                May 12, 2011:
                added FIXCONTROL '6055658:OFF' for UNIX
                FIXCONTROL
                '6055658:OFF'    UNIX SBP 11201x_date ( date >= 201105 )
So the SAP Note looks like FIXCONTROL should contain '6055658:OFF'
2) EWA
Settings defined but not recommended
                6055658:OFF
Thanks in advance.

Hello Bill,
You should always check and go with the recommendation from the parameter note.
10g - 830576
11g -1431798
For the fixcontrol parameters, these were introduced to allow enabling and disabling of optimizer fixes . The corresponding patch therefore needs to be installed to enable you to you set the required parameter. With EWA, this report usually flags any parameter which may require further checking, (ie because a note exists that details behaviour of setting this parameter for example a performance behaviour in OLTP versus OLAP). EWA is doing this to ensure that the DBA is aware that there is some additional step, info regarding the parameter. The Colleagues above have already mentioned to run the parameter script which checks it's result against the Oracle version parameter note and flags any incorrect setting and also provides the setting that is recommended. Before you do this you should check the relevant parameter note for these recommendations.
Hope this helps
Best Regards
Rachel
Edited by: Rachel Holloway on Mar 4, 2012 2:18 PM

SAP Note Nr. 683745

Hi SD Consultants,
Can someone explain me about SAP Note Nr. 683745. We applied this in 4.7 but now we are upgrading to ECC 6.0. Now we want to analyse if this note is required in ECC 6.0. I'm not sure if this is SD specific or FM specific. If someone can explain what this note does, that would be of great help.
SAP Note Nr. 683745                          03.10.2008           Page 1
     Number                   683745
     Version                  0014
     Processor                BALAJI
     Processing Status        In Process
     Implement. Status        Completely implemented
     Language                 EN
     Short Text               Utility programs for SD-FM integration
     Component                PSM-FM-UP-CM
     Long Text
     Symptom
     You discover that the net value in some sales orders does not agree with
     amounts in Funds Management (FM).
     Other terms
     VA01, VA02, VA03, Sales Distribution (SD)
     Reason and Prerequisites
     Reason: Inconsistency between SD and FM.
     Solution
     1. Create executable programs ZZ_CHECK_SDFM, ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 and
        ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM under Financial Accounting (FI) in a customer
        development class beginning with Y or Z, with the titles:
        ZZ_CHECK_SDFM         Check of sales order inconsistencies in FM
        ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02      Update of sales orders in Funds Management
        ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM   FM correction of deleted sales order lines
        a) After you have saved and activated programs, you can take over
           text symbols in English from the programs as follows:
           - SE38 -> Text elements -> Change (CTRL+F1) -> Utilities ->
              Adjust -> Textsymbols -> Edit -> Insert text symbols.
     Alternatively, you can copy and paste the text from the following lines:
     Text symbols for program ZZ_CHECK_SDFM
     Sym Text                                                dLen mLen
     010 Doc. no.   Line                                       15 15
     011       Amount in SD          Amount in FM              40 40
     020   Line deleted in SD                                  18 18
     030 Net values of selected sales orders in FM are correct 53 53
     040 Missing line in FM                                    18 18
     Text symbols for program ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02
     Sym Text                                                dLen mLen
                                                                       Page 2
     010 SD order was updated.                                 21 30
     Text symbols for program ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM
     Sym Text                                                 dLen mLen
     010 Doc. no.   Item                                        15 16
     020 Amount in SD          Amount in FM                     34 34
     030 Line deleted in SD                                     18 18
     040 Net values of selected sales orders in FM are correct. 53 53
     050 AccAs AmTp Year FM Date    Period          Amount      49 49
     060 Correction is not possible with selected date.         46 46
     100 Date/period for corrections                            27 27
        b) Then choose the "Selection texts" tab and take all possible
           parameters from the dictionary by checking the "Dictionary ref."
           box.
     2. Now you can run ZZ_CHECK_SDFM to identify inconsistencies in SD-FM
        integration. The billing amounts are not considered by this program
        ZZ_CHECK_SDFM.
     3. To correct any inconsistencies found, you can access the sales order
        using transaction VA02.
        a) In the most cases, if you change and remove a change in VA02 and
           then
        b) save, it will correct FM amount.
        c) For larger numbers of incorrect sales orders, you can use program
           ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02. To run ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 you will need to
           implement for EA-PS 1.10-2.00 the correction instructions
           0120031469-347128 or 0120031469-347129.
        d) You will need to change 2 methodes: TRANSACTION_INIT and
           SAVE_DOCUMENT using the transaction SE19 and implementation
           IM_BADI_SD_SALES_FM.
     4. Inconsistencies that cannot be corrected using VA02 or
        ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 will be most likely where a sale order line item was
        deleted and the deletion was not recorded in FM. In such cases, you
        will notice the text: 'Line deleted in SD' in the log of
        ZZ_CHECK_SDFM. Such lines can be corrected with 3 ways:
        a) You need to create the deleted line again, save the sales order,
           and then delete the line again. This will only have the desired
           effect if sales order deletion is working correctly in FM. This
           manual correction has an advantage that Budgetary Ledger documents
           are created as well.
        b) The second way is required for sales order lines which were
           carried forward in FM to the next fiscal year and which are not
           possible to recreate again, because sales order does not exist or
           automatic line item numbering does not allow to type a certain
           number. In such case you will need to run program
           ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM in order to close the open amount in FM. If
           you use Budgetary Ledger (B/L), then you will need to run
                                                                       Page 3
           budgetary ledger reconciliation program RFFMFG_BL_CORR for
           corrected sales order document in order to create B/L document for
           the FM closing amount.
        c) The third way can be used only for sales orders, which were not
           carried forward yet. It is suitable for sales orders which were
           completely deleted in SD and the deletion was not recorded in FM.
           In such case you can delete FM line items using deletion program
           RFFMDLOI. If you have Period Based Encumbrance Tracking (PBET)
           active, you need to use the modified version, ZFFMDLOI, provided
           in note 577860. If you also use Budgetary Ledger (BL), this third
           way is not suitable for you unless you are experienced with B/L
           reversal program ZRFFMBLREVERSEDOC (provided by note 683707) and
           locating the B/L document based on the relation of fields
           FMIOI-TRANR and BKPF-XBLNR.
     Valid Releases
     IS-Public Sector
         462
     SAP R/3 Enterprise AddOn Public Sector
         110
         200
         500
     ISPSADIN - Merge IS-PS & DI
         10A
Thanks,
Rajbans

Hi ,
SAP note 1810084 - SAPBWNews NW BW 7.30 ABAP SP10
This note contains the SAPBWNews for ABAP Support Package 10 for BW release 7.3
It provides a list of all notes describing the corrections or enhancements in Support Package 10.This note will be updated when other notes are added.
To customers who power their BW with SAP HANA, SAP strongly recommends to apply the latest available SAP HANA revision.
AS there is no correction instruction in this note, this cannot be implemented using SNOTE.
You need to refer to all the SAP notes mentioned in this note and apply relevant notes.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

How to "roll back" SAP APO PPDS planning batch run from infeasible batch mid-point to before start of planning batch run?

Hi Experts,
We are investigating if any SAP customer that implemented SAP APO PPDS has ever attempted to establish a "roll back" of the SAP APO PPDS created supply plan to a defined point before the start of the SAP APO PPDS planning batch run?
We have a situation where - in the middle of the planning batch run - randomly or intermittent the batch run hangs or runs a step for multiple hours that normally, at most days, takes only a few minutes to run. In a situation like this, the supply plan is not in a state where customer sales orders can be promised (using GATP CTP) or planned orders can be converted to production orders and published to SAP ECC, etc since the plan may be capacity infeasible or simply partial or incomplete.   To not hold the business operations hostage to wait resuming operations (promise customer sales orders, convert and release and execute orders to transfer, deliver, produce, or purchase) for hours or days, we need to find a way back to the original plan right before the nightly PPDS batch planning job started.
We already close all the queues from ECC to APO, thus, no CIF traffic from ECC to APO. We also shut down the customer sales order feed into ECC as normal process for duration of the APO PPDS batch planning run. Thus, functionally, we are theoretically in a situation to simply go back to a PPDS and active planning version save prior to the run. Yet, many more technical and BASIS-related questions remain on how to roll back to a state where the plan was not compromised.
This inquiry is to learn if any other SAP customer has ever established a process to roll back SAP APO PPDS to a previous point in time supply plan to resume operations? Whatever the reasons are, be it after a failed batch run, or any time during the normal interactive plan day.
Additional information about our design and plan:
1. We have a two year horizon supply plan in PPDS
2. We only publish to ECC 14 days worth of planned orders, stock transfer requirements, and purchase requirements
3. We convert planned orders to production orders and release production orders in ECC 2 days before first operation starts
4. We convert PR's to PO's and STR's to STO's in ECC 2 days before execution (ship or submit to vendor)
Any indication where a SAP customer has developed and uses a process to roll back an SAP APO PPDS- planned supply plan to an earlier point in time or version would be helpful to know.
Regards,
Manimaran M.

Hi Manimaran,
Saving in Simulation means in DS board when you click on save it provides you option to save sim version or adopt to active version. If you copy to inactive version you cannot copy back trasaction data specially PPDs orders back to active version again while if you save in simulation you can adope it to active version at any point of time. YOu can adopt simulation version changes to active version using T-code /SAPAPO/CDPSS0
Copying to active version means you copy data from version 000 to some other active version while here results are kept simulation,

How to revert back a SAP NOTE? Dump- Field symbol has not yet been assigned

Hi Experts,
We r getting dump(cause: Field symbol has not yet been assigned) in production for ABUMN tx, so, when debugged, it came to know that, the Field symbol is coming from REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY!!
So, for some reason the system message text is not getting output in ALV-->Dump!!
So, found a NOTE causing this problem!!
So, pls. let me know that, How to revert back this/any SAP NOTE? pls. in detail steps wise!!
thanq
Edited by: Srinivas on Jan 24, 2008 4:32 PM

Hi
In SNOTE tcode, select the Note that you implemented and click on 'RESET SAP Note Implementation'
shylesh

Sap note 1507799 - Sec 80CCD - pension contribution notified by central gov

Dear
I have applied the sap note 1507799 - Sec 80CCD - pension contribution notified by central govt. and have done the necessary manual config steps as mentioned in the sap note.
When i am trying to check this pension contribution notified by central govt item in IT0585 and IT 0586.
i am unable to get this item.
Regards
Vish

Hi ,
First do the manual changes & then apply the note. You will get "Contribution to pension scheme of Central Goverment" this option in IT 585
Regards,
Mahesh

Sap notes for 103 movement type and 105 movement types in sap

Hi all,
Please let me know if there are any sap notes for 103 movement type and 105 movement type in sap as soon as possible
points will be awarded.
thanking u in advance,
srinivas.

There are many SAP notes related to these movement types e.g 514609,750836,
533833, 808029, 317823,etc.
You can search them at http://service.sap.com
Regards,
Amit

Doubt in Downloading Sap notes in SNOTE Transaction

Hi Experts,
I want to download the sap note (442831) in my developement system. For that i am using the Tcode SNOTE here i used Goto-->Download Sap Note. I gave my sap note number in that window, then i executed. after few minites its saying downloaded.
After downloading i searched the notenumber in that list but its not displaying.
Why its happening? Plz guide this any otherway is there or i did any wrong things over this??
Plz plz its urgent. Point will be sure.
Thnx,
Mohana

HI,
Once you download the note it will be in NEW list click on it and expand then search the same
if you want to apply the patch then implement the note and finally change the processing status to completed
Regards
Shiva

Sap note 111232-redetermined batch in billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for