SC with Limit line items and Desc requirements _Incorrect Overall Limit

Hi,
When i create SC ,combining both limit items and non-catalog items (desc requirement), i am getting my PR created.
However, i observed that for Limit lines in PurReq, the expected value & Overall limit amounts are not being transferred correctly.
Overall limit is also showing as equal to expected value. This is happening only when i combine limit and full text lines together in a sc. It seems like a bug. We are on SRM 55 and patch 11.
Appreciate any inputs.
Thanks
Krish

Hi Karthik,
Thanks for your reply. I already checked these notes and they are not relevant for my issue.
My issue is like this. SC has got 4 lines and out of them 2 are Limits and 2 of them are describe req's lines.
for one of Limit line, overall limit is 1000$ and expected value is $500.
where as in the Purreq, i am getting both overall limit and expected value as $500 itself. basically overall limit is overwritten with expected value.
I found very old note something simillar to this issue: 304382.. its the otherway happening in my case.
Thanks
Krish

Similar Messages

Relation with Contract Line Item and Billing Plan

Can a Billing Plan have more than one Contract (Sales Document) Line Item ?
To detail, for example, a Billing plan is X and it has three Plan Items 1,2,3. Can there be situation where Billing Plan X:Item 1 is set up for Contract A:Item 10 and rest of the Items i.e. Billing Plan X:Item 2,3 are set up for a different Contract B:Item 20 ?

yes , we can

Partial goods receipt for PO with multiple line items

Hello All,
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Regards,
RJS

Hi
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
No. You cannot post the MIGO, if even one of the PO line item is having problem or giving error.
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If you skip a line irem and do GR with next line item, how will you match quantity & value with the vendor Invoice at LIV ?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Partial goods receipt is possible for PO line items. That means, if PO has 100 qty for line item 1 then you can do GR for 50 now and 50 later depending on the vendors delivery.
Hope this is what you mean by "Partial Goods Receipt".
Edited by: Arun R on May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

Can we create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item

can we create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item

Hi
Please check the link
[can v create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item]
and as Lakshmi said, check the forum before posting an issue.
Regards
AA

Header, Line Item and Cache Techniques Using Hashed Tables

Hi,
How can I work with header, line item, and a cache techniques using hashed tables?
Thanks,
Shah.

Hi,
Here is an example to clarify the ideas:
In general, every time you have a header-> lines structure you have a unique key for the lines that has at least header key plus one or more fields. I'll make use of this fact.
I'll try to put an example of how to work with header -> line items and a cache technique using hashed tables.
Just suppose that you need a list of all the material movements '101'-'901' for a certain range of dates in mkpf-budat. We'll extract these fields:
mkpf-budat
mkpf-mblnr,
mseg-lifnr,
lfa1-name1,
mkpf-xblnr,
mseg-zeile
mseg-charg,
mseg-matnr,
makt-maktx,
mseg-erfmg,
mseg-erfme.
I'll use two cache: one for maintaining lfa1 related data and the other to maintain makt related data. Also I'll only describe the data gathering part. The showing of the data is left to your own imagination.
The main ideas are:
1. As this is an example I won't use inner join. If properly desingned may be faster .
2. I'll use four hashed tables: ht_mkpf, ht_mseg, ht_lfa1 and ht_makt to get data into memory. Then I'll collect all the data I want to list into a fifth table ht_lst.
3. ht_mkpf should have (at least) mkpf's primary key fields : mjahr, mblnr.
4. ht_mseg should have (at least) mseg primary key fields: mjahr mblnr and zeile.
5. ht_lfa1 should have an unique key by lifnr.
6. ht_makt should have an unique key by matnr.
7. I prefer using with header line because makes the code easier to follow and understand. The waste of time isn't quite significant (in my experience at least).
Note: When I've needed to work from header to item lines then I added a counter in ht_header that maintains the count of item lines, and I added an id in the ht_lines so I can read straight by key a given item line. But this is very tricky to implement and to follow. (Nevertheless I've programmed it and it works well.)
The data will be read in this sequence:
select data from mkpf into table ht_mkpf
select data from mseg int table ht_mseg having in count all the data in ht_mkpf
loop at ht_mseg (lines)
filter unwanted records
read cache for lfa1 and makt
fill in ht_lst and collect data
endloop.
tables
tables: mkpf, mseg, lfa1, makt.
internal tables:
data: begin of wa_mkpf, "header
mblnr like mkpf-mblnr,
mjahr like mkpf-mjahr,
budat like mkpf-budat,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
end of wa_mkpf.
data ht_mkpf like hashed table of wa_mkpf
with unique key mblnr mjahr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_mseg, " line items
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
bwart like mseg-bwart,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
end of wa_mseg,
data ht_mseg like hashed table of wa_mseg
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: begin of wa_lfa1,
lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
end of wa_lfa1,
data ht_lfa1 like hashed table of wa_lfa1
with unique key lifnr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_makt,
matnr like makt-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
end of wa_makt.
data: ht_makt like hashed table of wa_makt
with unique key matnr
with header line.
result table
data: begin of wa_lst, "
budat like mkpf-budat,
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
end of wa_mseg,
data: ht_lst like hashed table of wa_lst
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: g_lines type i.
select-options: so_budat for mkpf-budat default sy-datum.
select-options: so_matnr for mseg-matnr.
form get_data.
select mblnr mjahr budat xblnr
into table ht_mkfp
from mkpf
where budat in so_budat.
describe table ht_mkpf lines g_lines.
if lines > 0.
select mblnr mjahr zeile bwart charg
matnr lifnr erfmg erfme
into table ht_mseg
from mseg
for all entries in ht_mkpf
where mblnr = ht_mkpf-mblnr
and mjahr = ht_mjahr.
endif.
loop at ht_mseg.
filter unwanted data
check ht_mseg-bwart = '101' or ht_mseg-bwart = '901'.
check ht_mseg-matnr in so_matnr.
read header line.
read table ht_mkpf with table key mblnr = ht_mseg-mblnr
mjahr = ht_mseg-mjahr.
clear ht_lst.
note : this may be faster if you specify field by field.
move-corresponding ht_mkpf to ht_lst.
move-corresponding ht_mseg to ht_lst.
perform read_lfa1 using ht_mseg-lifnr changing ht_lst-name1.
perform read_makt using ht_mseg-matnr changing ht_lst-maktx.
insert table ht_lst.
endloop.
implementation of cache for lfa1.
form read_lfa1 using p_lifnr changing p_name1.
read table ht_lfa1 with table key lifnr = p_lifnr
transporting name1.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
clear ht_lfa1.
ht_lfa1-lifnr = p_lifnr.
select single name1
into ht_lfa1-name1
from lfa1
where lifnr = p_lifnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_lfa1-name1 = 'n/a in lfa1'. endif.
insert table ht_lfa1.
endif.
p_name1 = ht_lfa1-name1.
endform.
implementation of cache for makt
form read_makt using p_matnr changing p_maktx.
read table ht_makt with table key matnr = p_matnr
transporting maktx.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
ht_makt-matnr = p_matnr.
select single maktx into ht_matk-maktx
from makt
where spras = sy-langu
and matnr = p_matnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_makt-maktx = 'n/a in makt'. endif.
insert table ht_makt.
endif.
p_maktx = ht_makt-maktx.
endform.
Reward points if found helpfull...
Cheers,
Siva.

Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.

Can you please help to look into this issue.
1.Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.
2. But user claim that she got enough limit and should not route to her manager's approval. Also check with her manager and this PO do not exist his queue.
Any clue or tips on how to investigate on this issue. All your tips are appreciated,
-Rick

You cannot change these POs because their changed version has status
'Deleted'. My proposal to fix them will be the following:
You will have to set changed version as closed(DOC_CLOSED set to X)
and in active version set DOC_CLOSED to space.
__-For the above statement, Can you guys please let me know, which table DOC_CLOSED belongs to and what are the steps to do this, as i come from a functional back ground.__

SCC question - how can I get a list of all line items and minor line items associated with a single contract?

Current;y have to expand each major line item and check all the minor line items, I just want a list of SNs associated with the contract. Any way to get this mailed to me every month?

Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact the forum mods they should be able to get this problem sorted for you this is a link to them http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
They normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days they will take personal ownership of your problem until resolved and will keep you informed of progress
They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

SAPF150D-Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Record

When I am running this program SAPF150D(Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Records) with a variant containing run date, runc id, update mode, pimmed & pcount; the job is failing to execute. It is giving message like,
"The field symbol is no longer assigned because there was an attempt makde previously in a Unicode program to set the field symbol using ASSIGN with offset and/or length specification. Here, the memory addressed by the offset/length specification was not within the allowed area."
"GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED_RANGE" "SAPF150D" or "F150DFS0" "SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN"

Hi,
Search for routine FORM SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN
in SAPF150D.
Put a breakpoint in statement
ASSIGN (T047F-FELDN) TO <H1>.
in above routine and debug to the point where error is occuring.
Most likely there is a mismatch in the length assigned to some field FELDN in table T047F.
In that case, simply change the T047F-LENGT field accordingly in change mode.
Cheers,
Vikram
Edited by: Vikram Jalali on May 27, 2008 5:56 PM

Runtime error - FBL1N - vendor balance with customer line item

Hi gurus,
One scenario where i have assign vendor as customer & customer as vendor in vendor & customer data. also make tick mark for both clearing with vendor & customer.
when i see the customer report with vendor item it shows me the customer & vendor dues but when i tried to see the vendor balance with customer line item it gives dump error.
Runtime Errors         PERFORM_NOT_FOUND
Exception              CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM
Error analysis
    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM', was
     not caught in
    procedure "%_LDB_CALLBACK" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    The program "RSDBRUNT" is meant to execute an external PERFORM,
    namely the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the program "RFITEMAP ", but
    this routine does not exist.
    This may be due to any of the following reasons:
    1. One of the programs "RSDBRUNT" or "RFITEMAP " is currently being developed.
    The name "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " of the called routine may be incorrect, or
    the routine "CB_DDF_GET_KNA1 " is not yet implemented in the program "RFITEMAP
    2. If the program SAPMSSY1 is involved in the runtime error, one of
    the function modules called via RFC is not flagged as remote-capable.
    (see Transaction SE37 Goto -> Administration -> RFC flag)
    3. There is an inconsistency in the system. The versions of the
    programs "RSDBRUNT" and "RFITEMAP " do not match.
Warm regards,
Dhananjay R.

Hi martin
still problem was not solved. actually i am working on ECC 6.0 & not required to implement the sap note on development. i had done the configuration in vendor master & customer master for clearing.
please suggest me.....what to do ?
Than'x
Dhananjay R

Confirmation of service PO with multiple line item

Hi SAP Experts,
We are using SRM 7EhP1(classic scenario).
I have a question regarding confirmation of service shopping carts/POs with several line items.
We created a SC (and successively a PO) with N service positions.
When we try to create a SRM confirmation, it seems that we can only confirm one position at a time.
For material SC, in the list of SCs open for confirmation we have a line for each shopping cart, and you can create a single confirmation for the whole shopping cart.
On the contrary, for service SC we have a line for each SC line. In this case, we cannot process all the lines in a single confirmation, but we need to create multiple confirmations.
Is that correct? Is there a way to confirm at the same time all the service positions of the SC?
Thanks!
Cinzia

Hello Cinzia,
Regarding creating service confirmations we can create only one confirmation for one line item of SC. If there are N line items we have to create N confirmations. This is because activation of Service bundling switch in SRM and this switch is irreversible. This switch is a facility/convenience for SRM PO's replicated to ECC to view all service line items in ECC without bundling. This scenario happens for both Service and Limit items.
I hope service bundling switch in your SRM system 7 EHP1 is activated.
There is no other way to create service confirmations for all items at one go.
We do have this inconvenience and raised this concern with SAP and no reply.
Hope, this answers your question.
Best Regards,
Kalyan

STO or PO for multiple line items and multiple destinations

I am working in retail enviornment and I have folloowing two questions:
1- we need to push articles( materials) to approx 1400store- we need to create STO with approx 10 line items and send materails to 1400 stores- this happens several times a year.
what is the easiest way to create this document without having to create either 1400 documents or create one document for all stores and enter 14000 lines? (Sames items/ and qty going to all stores)
2- We also have to send approx 600 items to one or two stores at a time ( when a new store is opened)- these items are same.
Is there a way to create this STO/ PO and keep reusing this document again and again withoiut entering 600 line items everytime this requirement comes up ( this requirements comes up anywhere from 10 times per year to 50 times/yr
Does anyone have any idea on how to simplyfy this process. Any help/ idea would be of great help.
Thanks
Raj

A PO once entered can be copied in ME21N, by drag-n-drop into the shopping cart. The problem might be changing delivery dates and delivery plants.
Another option is to use BOMs.

Unable to create PO with multiple line items through LSMW-BAPI method

Hi All,
I have a requirement of creating PO through LSMW. I can't use LSMW standard batch input program since there are some fileds not available and also it has many limitations. I'm using LSMW-BAPI method ( Business object BUS2012) which create IDOC and uses BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to ultimately post the PO in the system. I am trying to create PO from a single file which contains both Header and Item data.
Now my problem is that everytime PO is being created with Single line item only. Everytime I am giving multiple item data in the source file LSMW is preparing multiple IDOCs for multiple line items. As per my understanding this is happenng since header and item is in the same hierarchy level of IDOC type PORDCR102 and the control record is inserted for every line item in the source file.
It seems that through LSMW-BAPI it is not possible to create PO with multiple line items. Can anybody provide some input regarding this? Thanks in advance.
BR,
Atanu Mukherjee

Solved by myself.
Earlier the problem was that LSMW was not being able to recognize items under same header. It was creating new IDOCs every time it gets a new item. To enable this we need to create two structure HEADERDATA and ITEMDATA. Two additional identifier fields with identifier value 'H' and 'I' should be added in these two structures respectively. Then we need one sequential file with the identifiers field followed by the header and Item data. Example:
H~header data
I~item data
I~item data
This would help the standard program to understand what are the items under same header and ultimately create PO with multiple line items.
BR,
Atanu Mukherjee

Relation between Invoice Line items and Accounting Line item

Dear All,
My requirement is to print all the invoice documents and it's tax values like cenvat, Ecess, BED and VAT.
I have to fetch these tax details from BSEG table .
I' am getting Invoice number ( RBKP-BELNR ) from BKPF-AWTKEY .
Can any one please tell me how to relate the Invoice line items and Accounting document line items..
Any BAPI or FM is there to retrieve these data.
Please do needful in this regard.

Hi,
from table bseg - field Koart
K = Vendor
D = Customer
S = G/L account here tax lines identify with buzid = T
or take table bset for taxes
Andreas

Printing multiple PR with different line items in smartform

Hello all,
I have an requirement to print multiple PR with different line items on different pages.
So,suppose two PR are there,PR1 and PR2 with n no of line items,then i should get each PR on different page with its line items.
Note: One loop processing is already there on line items.
Best Regards,
Anurodh

Hi,
Fetch all the PRs and its corresponding items into 2 different table. Then Loop at the internal whihc contains the PRs and call the 2nd internal table for its items and call the FM for smartforms and pass them.
LOOP AT it_PR.
fetch all the items into it_PR_item
Call Function Fnam
Passign the it_PR_item
ENDLOOP.
Regards,
Aditya

Documents has been posted with out line item

Hi,
Actully my user created GL Account with out line item he posted transactions into documents
Now we are not able to see the documents
T-CODE:FS10N
GL Account
Company code
Fiscal year
when ever click on amount not able to see the documents.
Please give me guide lines to solve this issue.
Thanks&Regards,
Prabhakar

Hi,
For secenario 2, you have to put below validation to achieve your requirement.
Cumulative add quantities of all the entries which are having status 'E' - GR for the combination of PO number and line item number.
Ex: PO no: xyz & two line items 01 and 02
In the EKBE table selection screen, give PO number and line item number. Then system will display all histery for that PO line item.
then collect all the entries which are having status 'E'. Now, we have only all GR entries ( 101 & 102)
Add quantities of all the entris which are having movemnt type 101 and 102 separately.
Substract sum with movement type1 from the sum wiyh movement ment type 102.
If result is zero, that means no GR posted. Total PO quantity open.
Then this case only, system should allow for chnages.
Regards
KRK

SC with Limit line items and Desc requirements _Incorrect Overall Limit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for